Tag: NERC

  • PHCN investors to get certificate Oct. 2

    PHCN investors to get certificate Oct. 2

    •Delta youths decry illegal collections

    The new owners of the Power Holding Company (PHCN) Limited entities will assume ownership on October 2, the General Manager, Government and Consumer Affairs, Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission (NERC), Dr. Tony Akah, has said.

    He spoke yesterday during the NERC Power Consumer Assembly of the Local Government Enlightenment Campaign in Sapele, Delta State.

    He said: “On October 2, or thereabout, we are going to handover the certificates of ownership to all the distribution companies to these private people. When we do that, the PHCN will hands off.”

    Akah said though challenges in the sector would not disappear overnight upon the emergence of the private owners, there would be improvement in service delivery.

    During the question and answer session, a youth, Mr Onasanya Atumu, lamented that PHCN officials collect N2,000 from every compound monthly without supplying power.

    He threatened that PHCN and its personnel would be set ablaze should the commission fail to stop them.

    His words: “I am for Agazali Communications, a private announcement outfit for the community. As a matter of fact, the light in this community is not properly arranged. For example, in some areas we don’t have light. But I make announcement for PHCN that people should pay their bills. I receive a hell of insults. They even insult my family.”

  • BPE, NERC discuss business plans of core investors

    BPE, NERC discuss business plans of core investors

    The Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission (NERC) has met with a team from the Bureau of Public Enterprises (BPE), to, among other things, discuss the business plans of core investors of privatised power firms.

    It was called to establish modalities for a seamless handover of the privatised electricity companies’

    According to a statement by the NERC Assistant General Manager, Media, Maryam Yaya Abubakar, yesterday, he said the issues tabled at the meeting included the application of the Fit and Proper Guidelines, business plans of the core investors, framework for monitoring and enforcement of transaction agreements, and the formalisation of contracts pertaining to transmission, power purchase agreements, vetting contracts and gas supply agreements.”

    He said the BPE Director -General, expressed his satisfaction at the level of responsiveness displayed by NERC when ever issues were raised in the past, adding that the BPE had enjoyed a good working relationship with NERC.

    Chairman, NERC, Dr. Sam Amadi, while congratulating Dikki on his confirmation as Director-General of the BPE, stressed the importance of preparing grounds for a successful takeover. He maintained that NERC will on its own part heighten its already laid down procedures for monitoring and enforcement.

    He the priority of the Commission remains customer metering, without which the industry cannot stand, adding that owners of the new distribution companies will be required to adopt the existing metering scheme put in place by the Commission or provide a better alternative.

    A further meeting has been scheduled for next week to review the fit and proper guidelines as well as to arrive at the mechanism for dealing with liabilities incurred, post-handover.

  • ‘Why stable power remains a dream’

    ‘Why stable power remains a dream’

    Dr. Sam Amadi, who sits atop the Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission (NERC), the agency saddled with the responsibility of overseeing the nation’s power sector, holds the view that lack of sustained investment, corruption, as well as political intrigues are to blame for the lingering crisis in the power sector. 

    Nigerians are not happy over the perennial power crisis in the country. Why has the power crisis remained intractable for so long?

    When you talk about what is happening in the power sector and what we should be doing, the first thing I’ll tell you is to say some of the things we have done and what I think we should be doing and how to go forward. All of us know what has happened to the power sector in Nigeria. We are a country of 160million people. We are a large country with a large population. As at today, all our installed capacity is slightly above 6, 000 mega watts of electricity. May be if we add the ones that are not working, we can have about 9, 000mw. South Africa is about 50-60million people, yet they have about 40,000mw.

    I recall that one of the last good power plants we had under Shehu Shagari, Egbin Power Station, alone used to generate about 1, 200megawatts but because we failed to keep up the tempo of activity in the sector, we are now suffering the dire consequences. If we created three more Egbins, we won’t be in this situation by now.

    Most countries of the world produce at least 2, 000mw every other year. India just had a plan to produce an additional 100,000mw in five years. But we don’t have such plans. Even if the PHCN runs diligently we still cannot meet up.

    Lagos alone requires 10, 000-15, 000 mw and more to drive its economy as a mega city. Two decades and more of insufficient or low investment led to the problem affecting the power sector at the moment.

    The problem of power crisis dates back to several decades. Between the late 80s and 90s, the country could barely generate a paltry 2, 100 megawatts of electricity because there were no conscious attempts by the federal government to invest in the power sector.

    By 2000, the electricity system had collapsed and we were having about 2, 000mw and, at the same time, politicians had expanded rural electrification. What it means is that as part of your campaign promises, you procure transformers for some communities where there are no PHCN lines, under the guise of providing constituency projects you donate transformers without recourse to procedures and all that.

    But thankfully, the Electricity Act had three major policy thrusts aimed at addressing the problem in the sector.

    One way was the involvement of the private sector because the government felt it didn’t have the money required to boost the system because it cost at least $1million to produce one megawatt of electricity.

    The other thing was to ensure liberalisation of the market, a market where you have rules that govern trading. The idea being that if the market is profitable enough then people can readily invest in it because when you regulate price, you can then create electricity market because the industry cannot just thrive without a market.

    But it is the belief in some quarters that one way to tackle the power crisis is to adopt the example of the telecoms sector, where competition has led to improved service delivery of sorts…

    Power is unlike telecom where all you need to do is deregulate and you say come and buy spectrum which government auctions. Investors build their mast and become operational.

    In telecoms, all you need to do is deregulate and say come and buy broadband and then the government auctions it and the signals go by air and you prepare to launch out. But in power, you make a lot of investments. It takes you an average of three to four years to generate power. If I get license today there is no way I can start to produce. There is no way you can embark on a power project except the prospective investors agree ahead on modalities of how to make recoveries.

    So, before anybody digs a power cable, somebody has agreed to buy that power because if you don’t agree, he will not start. So, it’s a delicate balance.

    The Electricity Power Sector Reform Act was therefore canvassed to bring about a power policy that will lead to efficiency, in terms of deliverables, address the issue of the quality of supply, corruption and all of that.

    So, as an investor, you have an idea that there would be corporate governance and there will be regulation to protect the consumer. This is what the policy framework is all about.

    In those days, NEPA donates the power, NEPA are the ones that distribute, and you couldn’t even sue NEPA then. NEPA had what you could call a vertically integrated monopoly.

    There are claims that the privatisation of the sector is shrouded in mystery…

    Privatisation is a contested issue all over the world. And I always say this, what matters is the nature of the regulatory environment.

    It does not mean that government does not work because this is so important. I’m opposed to the ideology that government does not work. In the US, we hear of government institutions competing favourably with the private sector for efficient service delivery.

    But in Nigeria government-owned companies have failed because we are not ready to change our public institutions.

    So, I would rather we ensure workable privatisation. The next issue is why does public sector not work? The answer is simple: corruption. If there are benefits and sanctions, things will take shape.

    Unlike in the private sector, there is no shareholder convention that will come and tell a public corporation that, look you have lost money this year, why is this so? So, it is difficult to have efficiency in that kind of situation.

    But again, there is no law that says the only way to run a public company efficiently is to privatise it. No, but once we run our public institutions on commercial value things can work, which means if we give you a budget, you must deliver.

    The second issue is that we must be willing to raise the level of investment in the power sector because except investors find the market attractive, they won’t come.

    In the past, we did not invest continuously in the sector. Some of the money were stolen and embezzled by corrupt officials.

    Let me tell you, no bank was prepared to lend prospective investors loans to finance the power sector. UBA, for instance, was financing power plants being built in Sierra Leone, until this present regime because of the issue of marketability.

    How much will you sell it and secondly who will buy that power and pay what?

    We didn’t invest continuously in the sector and we did not create. Half of the money was stolen by corrupt officials or the money was diverted to other uses. Nobody will invest in this market if they don’t see how they can get their money back.

    On the issue of moneybags buying over the power plants, I don’t have any problem with that at all because even if a power plant is N1billion, someone like me cannot buy it.

    But as a regulator in the sector, it is our job to ensure that the overriding public interest is not jeopardised in any way.

    For me, the mandate to these operators is look, you must deliver on the promise.

    Skyrocketing price of electricity is one issue that has remained hotly debated. What is your take on this matter?

    Before now, Nigeria was the second lowest tariff country in the world, but we are somewhere in between the middle now. Electricity is a human right no doubt because the most important thing a consumer wants is availability. Even if this is a human right, without appropriate pricing things will remain comatose.

    If Nigeria produces 20, 000megawatts, the price will go down. But I agree that we are paying an estimated price.

    On fixed charge, the real issue is not the amount, it is the fact that people don’t get electricity as and when due.

    Everything in the industry is paid for; wire, cables poles, meter, etc.

    Pricing of electricity is based on social class. The big people are the ones subsidising the cost for the poor people. We recover cost more from commercial and industrial users.

    And it takes more than a year or two to get a plant going.

    Before the electricity sector can grow, there have to be intense investments into the sector which must also be afforded a time gap to mature, with one mega watt of electricity costing $1 million to produce.

    Our system is not the type that detests corruption. Unless we have a change of attitude, things can’t move as they should because corruption is a measure of the moral laxity in the industry.

    You have to pay bills, we need to privatise this industry because it is a key industry that drives socio-economic growth and development. So, I think the problem of corruption can be tackled once there is the right political will.

    We have zero-tolerance to corruption in the commission. Every staff of NERC has at least N10million insurance, has access to housing loans. Then if there is still corruption, then we have no choice but to give them the boot.

    Poverty is not by income, it depends on many factors or what you call the vulnerability test. For instance, if you live in a country like Nigeria, where the public health sector is comatose and you have another individual who will probably spend as little as $100 to access healthcare compared to you in Nigeria who will require at least N100, 000 to get the same level of service, who is poorer? Of course, it is you who is paying more for the same thing.

    Our poverty is even bigger than we think because it is not just about income. Even as an individual, there are some ailments that will afflict my household and I don’t think I’ll have the financial capacity to manage it. So, I consider myself poor by virtue of these teething problems of underdevelopment.

  • Electricity thieves to face prosecution – NERC

    Electricity thieves to face prosecution – NERC

    Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission (NERC) has set machinery in motion to arrest unscrupulous individuals guilty of pilfering electricity across the country.

    NERC Chairman, Dr. Sam Amadi read out the riot act during an exclusive interview with The Nation recently.

    According to the NERC boss, “The era when unscrupulous individuals were in the habit of stealing power will soon be a thing of the past. The NERC now has a framework in place to prosecute anybody found guilty of such heinous crimes as pilfering with PHCN cables among other related crimes.”

    The NERC, he stressed, is expected to galvanise action in that direction in the coming weeks.

    Amadi further explained that overtime the fixed charge element in the tariff regime would come down, as the amount of electricity supplied improves.

    He expressed the commission’s readiness to regulate the sector in the light of the new owners of the privatised Power Holding Company of Nigeria (PHCN) coming on stream.

  • Sambo, others for conference

    Vice President Namadi Sambo and the Chief Executive officer, Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission (NERC) Dr Sam Amadi will address participants at the WorldStage Power Conference taking place in Lagos on September 24.

    The theme of the conference is: Moving electricity power sector forward.

    Amadi is scheduled to present a paper, Power sector liberalisation and regulatory challenges.

    According to the President, WorldStage, Mr Segun Adeleye, the conference is coming on the heels of the decision of the 13 consortia to meet the deadline for the payment of their 75 per cent before they can take over the assets of the Power Holding Company of Nigeria (PHCN).

  • CPC, NERC  partner to protect electricity consumers 

    CPC, NERC  partner to protect electricity consumers 

    The Consumer Protection Council (CPC) is partnering with the Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission (NERC) to protect electricity consumers.

    CPC Director-General Mrs. Catherine Atoki, and NERC Chairman Dr. Sam Amadi, during a briefing, assured electricity consumers of redress and enforcement of regulations.

    She said: “The policy thrust of this administration is to synergise with such agencies with a view to entrenching consumer protection in all sectors of the economy. NERC is one critical stakeholder that I have to visit in order to properly situate the council’s mandate.

    “The Council must be fully integrated into various sector regulators’ consumer protection mechanisms in the country to ensure consumers interests are adequately protected in accordance with the law.”

    She stressed the need for strict enforcement of regulations and guidelines relating to consumer complaint handling standards and procedures, like the distribution companies are sanctioned for failure to meet up with the prescribed standards.

     

  • NERC’s tariff hike

    NERC’s tariff hike

    Was this commision set up merely to punish Nigerians with incessant charges?

    For understandable reasons, Nigerians have been united in outrage at the decision by the Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission, NERC to hike the fixed charge on electricity usage from N500 to N700/N800. Coming at a time when supply continues to dip on daily basis, even when things are supposed to be looking up, the anger would seem perfectly justifiable. NERC obviously assumed that Nigerians have become so inured to the warped consumerism under which they are coerced to pay for services neither supplied nor delivered, to the point of losing their capacity to protest their arbitrariness. This time, it appears they were mistaken.

    Nobody here suggests that the increase is anything outside of the framework of the Multi-Year-Tariff Order (MYTO) which lays out the framework for such reviews. And, no one disputes the existence of the regulation which allows such periodic reviews. In other words, the issue is not so much about the fixed charge, an in-built cost element charged to recover some of the capital costs for producing and supplying electricity. Rather, the question on the lips of Nigerians is whether it makes sense to persuade frustrated citizens to bear further tariff increases in the circumstances that the government itself admits that very little progress has been made, measured against set targets and against its earlier declared commitments.

    NERC may be right to argue that the current N700 fixed charge for R2 customers actually covers only a small fraction of the actual fixed cost of supply.

    That is not the issue. What is at issue is the justification of any hike at all given NERC’s admission that “the quality of service has not seen significant improvement, especially in the area of metering and accurate billing of customers”?

    The statement by NERC chairman, Sam Amadi, that “the distribution companies have not been very committed to meeting their obligations in the MYTO” comes as particularly instructive here. Shouldn’t Nigerians protest the MYTO that is so clearly skewed against them – a mechanism which seeks to reward non-performance? Shouldn’t there be some form of respite for the power-starved electricity consumers for once? These are the issues.

    NERC may in its wisdom consider the increase modest; we say it is untimely and unjustifiable; and therefore wrong.

    We agree with the NERC boss when he says that “Our expectation for significant and sustained improvement in electricity supply and quality service lies in the expected takeover by the privatisation preferred bidders, who have better incentives and commitment, and have made enforceable promises to invest continuously in providing better services to consumers”.

    No one argues at this time that this is the way to go. The issue is the apparent lack of seriousness on the part of the Federal Government to make this realisable at the shortest possible time. Today, the issues of severance package for disengaged Power Holdings Company of Nigeria (PHCN) staff remains largely unresolved; we also saw how avoidable controversies and tardiness nearly botched the takeover of the transmission sector by Manitoba Hydroelectric of Canada. Even the government had to change gear on the issue of pre-paid meters; now it is the consumer that is being called upon to pay for meters as against government’s initial plan to supply them free to the consumers.

    We must insist on making the point that we are not opposed to any tariff review that is reflective of the dynamics of costs. Much as the Nigerian electricity consumer appreciates the need for the investors to recover their costs, what they resist is the extortionate practice of levying them at every turn, all in the name of tariff reviews.

  • NERC licenses seven firms  for 2,758mw

    NERC licenses seven firms for 2,758mw

    •TCN spends $3m on transco aerial survey

    The Nigeria Electricity Regulatory Commission (NERC) yesterday in Abuja, presented licenses to seven companies with combined 2,758 megawatts (MW) generating capacity.

    A breakdown of the companies and their generation capacities, according to NERC chairman, Dr. Sam Amadi, shows that Benin Generation Company Limited located at Ihovbor, Edo State will generate 450m;, Omotosho Generation Company Limited, located at Omotosho, Ondo State has the capacity to generate 500mw and Omoku Generation Company Limited at Omoku, Rivers State has the capacity to generate 250mw.

    Others include Gbarain Generation Company Limited located in Gbarain, Bayelsa State, which has the capacity to generate 225mw; Calabar Generation Company Limited, which is located in Calabar, Cross River State has the capacity for generating 561mw; Geregu Generation Company Limited, Geregu, Kogi State that has capacity to generate 434mw on grid while Egbema Generation Company Limited can generate 338mw. IT is located in Egbema, Imo State.

    Meanwhile, the Transmission Company of Nigeria (TCN) unbundled from the Power Holding Company of Nigeria (PHCN) has also spent $3million on the aerial survey of the country’s transmission line in the last two years.

    Principal Consultant, Penuel Consulting, LLC, Dr. Timmy Fadiora, disclosed this to reporters in Abuja yesterday after training on “Aeriel Survey and Geodetic Mapping on TCN transmission lines and Right of Way (ROW) Corridor.” He said the firm deployed its aircraft from the United States.

    According to him, $800,000 is required for only aircraft that will fly the nook and cranny of Nigeria. He explained that the firm will conduct an aerial survey on the entire transmission line in Nigeria and their substations.

  • NERC: What manner of regulation?

    NERC: What manner of regulation?

    SIR: Regulatory agencies in Nigeria, apart from a handful have done dismal jobs in regulation and consumer protection. Many are unaware of their responsibilities or are negligent. This leaves the Nigerian consumer in situation where he has no choice and therefore left to the vagaries of the market. The telecommunications revolution was successful due to the efforts of the regulator, in this case, the NCC and its relationship with consumers and telecoms operators. But the electricity reform seems to be taking a direction of its own, one which has little regards for the consumer and sees them as sheep to be sheared. The Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission NERC, seems intent on taking an unknown route despite the myriad examples of how not to do things,

    The Policy somersaults of NERC have left a bitter taste in mouths of consumers, the unfulfilled promises and the failures which are fruits of inadequate planning. When the NERC came up with the Multi-Year-Tariff-Order MYTO 2, is was to allow for sustainable generation of electricity and for adequate metering so as to avoid exploitation. Nigerians agreed with them and were expecting to see those promises delivered but the only thing we saw was outrageous bills in the midst of dismal improvement in electricity supply. Most consumers woke up to find out that their electricity charges and risen by about 50% and their consumption rates by the same. This would be no problem if the figures were correct, but has power generation increased by 50% since June 2012 and where is the extra consumption coming from?

    The average American home consumes 940 kilowatts hour (KWH) per month, Canada 950, British 500, France 500, Japan 500 according to World Energy Council, with 24 hours electricity. In our case, our electric bills tell us that we Nigerians are consuming 1000 kwh per month on average, Which would be funny if it were not a cruel joke.

    Looking back at the early days of the telecommunications revolution, we can remember the consumer councils which were organized and where industry players, consumers and regulators parlayed. There problems experienced by consumers were brought to the fore and the regulator and industry operators took note of them. But in this other revolution, such things are absent. There are so many questions to be asked but no one to talk to. The recent somersaults of NERC are even more menacing. We were promised free prepaid meters alongside MYTO but that turned out to be a failure. Now we are being told to pay for meters and get then in 45 days, yet no guidelines on how to pay and collect the meters.

    Every regulator operates with a carrot and stick policy applicable to consumers and industry operators, but the same cannot be said of the NERC. It would seem NERC gives the carrots to the industry operators only and reserves the stick for consumers. The Distribution Companies, DISCOS were required to provide free meters but due to the corrupt benefits they enjoy declined to do so and the regulator while acknowledging this did nothing. Even the 200 kilowatts hour max consumption rate for estimated billing, which would have reduced the incentive for corruption, went no further than the lips of the NERC chairman.

    Another disturbing aspect of the NERC is the absence of regulations covering the rights of consumers as regards safety and damages to life and property caused by voltage fluctuation. Numerous people have lost their lives, loved ones, property due to this menace with no reprieve and the regulator turns a blind eye to it. Or is the fault of the consumer that the distribution companies are inefficient and cannot maintain their equipment? Who is liable for the damage done, for the lives and property lost? Or should consumers start taking laws into their hands to solve their problems as is becoming the order of the day? I hope the NERC would borrow a leaf from the NCC and make the industry one that satisfies consumers, Industry operators and others concerned.

    • Nwachukwu Nnochiri

    Lagos

     

  • NERC kicks off new metering scheme

    NERC kicks off new metering scheme

    The Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission (NERC) yesterday started a new metering scheme by mandating the electricity distribution companies (DISCOs) to commence implementation of the Credited Advance Payment for Metering Implementation ( CAPMI).

    In the statement, the commission explained that CAPMI was introduced due to the slow pace of customer metering by the DISCOs, as well as the high level of complaints received from customers and dissatisfaction with the current estimated billing practices.

    It added that CAPMI provides a platform for willing customers to pay the cost of the meter into a dedicated account jointly managed by the DISCO and meter Vendor/Installer. Once payment has been effected, the customer will have their meter installed within 45 days, by a NERC accredited Vendor/Installer.

    The statement quoted the Chairman, NERC, Dr. Sam Amadi as saying that the cost of the meter was arrived at using the standard market price plus the most efficient installation costs.

    The DISCOs submitted data based on costs submitted by the DISCOs during the Multi Year Tariff Order (MYTO) review, as well as review of prices supplied by local manufacturers, he explained.

    In arriving at a list of meter Vendors and Installers of meters to partake in the CAPMI scheme, NERC followed a comprehensive due process by first advertising, and inviting the Bureau of Public Procurement (BPP) to supervise the process of certification based on the Metering Code, he said.

    Amadi explained that consultations were also held with various stakeholders including preferred bidders, would-be vendors and installers and Electricity Distribution Companies (DISCOs) as well as the financial institutions to agree on the framework and logistics of implementing the scheme. In selecting successful applicants, the Commission gave emphasis to local firms as a way of localizsing and promoting local content in the sector”.

    In a related development, the Commission has also signed an order mandating DISCOs to supply meters paid for by customers dating back to January 2011.