At 64, Nigeria a product of our visionary leaders and intellectuals mainly in the profession of journalism, medicine, law and teaching, committed to the emergence of a nation where the wellbeing of the privileged is the well-being of others, has come of age. I cannot find a more befitting tribute to our founding fathers than the following trending social media message.
“My father was a refuse collector, I went to FGC Warri. Government gave us uniforms, books; we ate chicken, we were paid transport fare to go back home. I could enter medical school in Ibadan without knowing anyone. I schooled with Odutola’s grandchild. Can anyone enter Ekpoma to read medicine today without knowing anyone?”
Many of those who promoted the idea of a more egalitarian society rose through their boot strings. Many of them never enjoyed the privileges and opportunities they gave others to become somebody in life. They loved and served their people. They planned for the survival of their nation. It was in this regard that Bode Thomas, who was to later die at 33, proposed regionalism “to prevent the country from the reign of one-eyed kings.”
Tragically, what we have had since the collapse of the first republic starting with Aguiyi Ironsi who decreed a unitary system for a heterogeneous society, Yakubu Gowon, Murtala Mohammed and Olusegun Obasanjo, who destroyed academy and bureaucracy without which society decays, through to Shehu Shagari, Ibrahim Babangida, Obasanjo, Umaru Yar’Adua, Goodluck Jonathan and Muhammadu Buhari who destroyed the legacies of our founding fathers in desperate search for their blurred vision of society, was at best reign of half blind men. It could have not been any less distressing they insisted they knew what was good for us without asking us.
When we express nostalgic feeling for our once thriving world class universities, they reminded us of their Bells, Babangida or Atiku Abubakar universities. When our self-proclaiming messiahs are reminded UCH Ibadan was one of the best three Teaching Hospitals in the Commonwealth of Nations, they have many alternatives including India. If they are reminded of our national airline with 33 aircraft flown by Nigerian pilots, they push down our throat, Okada, Sosoliso and other funny names. Our old shipping lines have substitutes in Raymond Dokpesi and Musa Yar’Adua Shipping lines; when we reminded of pipe-borne water in our city centres, they direct us to Coca-Cola and their other agents to buy water.
Unfortunately, for the greater part of our 64 years, their deadly tools for bringing us to our knees include politics of identity and toxic elections. With propaganda, disinformation, misinformation, outright lies, reality becomes picture in our heads. In terms of diatribes, disparaging propaganda, ethnic baiting, exploitation of the innermost fears of those who look up to us for direction, the 2023 presidential election was by the far the worst in our nation’s history.
But how did we get here?
Identity politics and toxic elections did not start until the 1931 Nigerian Youth Movement’s keenly and fiercely fought election. In that election, truth and principles became victim. Lagos youths that once saw themselves as Nigerians at war against a common enemy – the British imperialists – lost their innocence.
In that historic battle, Obafemi Awolowo had on the principle that the acting president had the right of first refusal, supported Ernest Ikoli, an Ijaw from the East against Akinsanya, his fellow Ijebu man sponsored by Dr Azikiwe. After a fierce battle, Ikoli won the election. But with Zik and his West African Pilot propaganda, Awolowo was declared a tribalist. That sounded a huge joke. But for Zik’s Igbo and Ijebu supporters, the most educated African of his era cannot be wrong. They all followed him out of NYM and the first major platform for Nigerian youths collapsed.
Read Also: Insecurity: 250 Nigerian Army captains begin promotion examination
Between August and December 1951, ethnic nationalism and religion sentiments had mounted with NPC winning the north, NCNC winning the east and AG the west. In the 1952, elections into the Federal House of Representatives, members of the central House were to be elected by the regional houses from among its members. The constitution recognized Lagos as part of West. The five seats meant for Lagos were therefore to come from the western-dominated house.
But Zik insisted on contesting in Lagos because as he rightly claimed, he was based in Lagos. But conscious of the western house’s unwillingness to have him as their representative to the federal legislature, he cut a deal with the five Lagos elected representatives so that three of them could step down for him. Unfortunately, two of them, Prince Adeleke Adedoyin and Dr Olorunnibe refused to step down, thereby preventing Zik from going to the central legislature. The response to the new development was to seek refuge under politics of identity.
In1951, after the regional election, of the five members elected on the platform of Ibadan Progressive Union, Adegoke Adelabu remained loyal to Zik and NCNC, while Adisa Akinloye and others joined Awolowo’s Action Group. This followed a stalemate as Zik and Mbadiwe and Zik’s other supporters insisted he should become the premier of the west while leading members of NCNC like Olu Akinfosile and TOS Benson who regarded NCNC as a Yoruba party as there was only one non-Yoruba in its inaugural meeting, insisted one of them be chosen to be premier.
The decision of the Yoruba in NCNC to be masters of their own fate at a period the north was administered by a northerner and the east by easterners became a subject of intense propaganda and blackmail and misinformation to the generation of Igbo youths. Of course, Obafemi Awolowo, who emerged leader of government, was crowned king of tribal politics. Even our world-celebrated Chinua Achebe could not restrain himself from dishing out disinformation when he wrote in his last major work There Was a Country that he witnessed carpet crossing of Zik supporters on the floor of Western House in 1952.
It is all about character and adherence to principles. Sadly our politics, has since become politics without principles. If Zik cannot manipulate the constitution to represent the west through the back door, Lagos must be separated from the west. If Awo would not give up on creation of states for minorities, the coalition partners can create just the Midwest to teach Awo a lesson (Balewa). If the constitution provided for non-interference of the centre in the affairs of the regions, the coalition could pass a retroactive law to undermine the constitution. If the Privy Council ‘s judgment was not favourable, , we may on the basis of our 1963 republican constitution replace it as the highest judicial body with our Chief Justice appointed by our president after dissolution of the judicial council.
NCNC’s 1959 coalition with NPC, a party with which it shared no ideological orientation, was probably driven by opportunism than any form of principles. NPP/NPN 1979 coalition after 33 months of war of attrition was not different. Opposition to MKO Abiola’s1993 landslide victory and Bola Tinubu’s 2023 travails fit the same narrative. What was not in doubt was the groundswell of opposition to MKO Abiola’s victory with Emeka Odumegwu-Ojukwu serving as Abacha’s envoy to de-market Abiola in Europe. There was a smear campaign against Tinubu with intent to hurt. He was vilified and abused by children of anger who would rather have military dictatorship to Tinubu presidency. The common denominator between these tormentors is lack of principle.
Identity politics thrives because nationalism is sometimes not without altruism. And as we have now seen from electoral records dating back to 1964, identity politics cannot guarantee electoral success. At some point, the coalition game has to be played. And periodic spoiler game has its limit. Since politics is a game where trust is perhaps the most important variable, spoiler game only keeps other groups on their guard.
Finally, it is just as well the president has invited the youths for a CONFAB where they can organize themselves for challenges of nation-building. Their future is in their hands. And that future is not going to be built on the street by an unthinking mob, trading lies in place of principles .Today’s reining god is democracy. And democracy has its ethos.







