Tag: Nigeria newspaper

  • N437m fraud: Three BDC operators get N60m bail

    A Federal High Court in Lagos on Wednesday granted three Bureau-De-Change operators N20 million bail each with two sureties in the like sum, following their arraignment for an alleged N437million fraud.

    Justice Nicholas Oweibo remanded the defendants – Jimmy Ibrahim, Obianuju Tessy Umejesi and Uche Madubuko – in prison custody pending their perfection of the bail terms.

    One of the sureties must be a landed property owner in Lagos, while the second surety must be a Grade Level 12 officer with Lagos State of the Federal Government, the judge said.

    The trio were arraigned on August 22 by the Police Special Fraud Unit (PSFU) Ikoyi, Lagos on a five-count charge of conspiracy, obtaining money by false pretence and fraud.

    Read Also: BDCs prepare for FATF evaluation visit to Nigeria

    Each defendant pleaded not guilty, following which the judge adjourned to hear their bail applications.

    At the resumed hearing of proceedings yesterday, Mr. Adekunle Adesanya (SAN), U. G. Ezeaba and Agnes Uzulor, prayed the court to admit the defendants to bail “in the most liberal terms.”

    But prosecution counsel Mr. Chukwu Agwu opposed them, arguing that others involved in the alleged offences are at large and granting the bail applications may jeopardise police efforts to arrest them.

    But, in a bench ruling, Justice Oweibo held: “In line with Section 36(5) of 1999 Nigerian Constitution and Section 162 of Administration of Criminal Justice Act (ACJA), each defendant is hereby admitted to bail in the sum of N20million with two sureties in the like sum.”

    He adjourned till October 3 for trial.

    The SFU, in a charge marked FHC/L/292c/19, alleged that the defendants committed the offences while operating under the names of Regis Bureau De Change, Jayjibs Ventures, Johim Ventures and Jajibs Bureau-De-Change.

    It said the trio, sometime in January, fraudulently obtained N437million from a firm, with a false promise to supply $1.2 million, which is the United States’ dollar equivalent.

    One of the operators, Jimmy Ibrahim, was said to have in April, May and June this year, issued three United Bank for Africa (UBA) cheques, numbered: 77046252; 77046253 and 77046254 from account number 1015196430i, with the total value of N73million, as part payment of the sum, but they were dishonoured for insufficient funds.

  • ‘Estate agent to be prosecuted for N65m fraud’

    An estate agent, who allegedly defrauded 262 prospective tenants of N65 million at Alapere, Ketu, Lagos, will be prosecuted, Attorney-General and Justice Commissioner Moyo Onigbanjo (SAN) has said.

    He said in a statement on Wednesday that he has taken over the prosecution of the agent.

    Lagos State Government in the statement titled: “Beware of fraudulent estate agents/developers”, advised residents to be careful by making enquiries before concluding property transaction with an agent.

    The statement said: “The Office of the Attorney-General/Commissioner for Justice is concerned about the increasing incidence of fraudulent offences of obtaining money by deception committed by fraudsters disguising as property developers and estate agents.

    Read Also: Lagos to prosecute developer

    “A complaint has reached our office concerning an estate agent alleged to have fraudulently received N65 million from 262 prospective tenants at Alapere, Ketu.

    “The Office of the Lagos State Attorney- General took over the prosecution of the case against the estate agent on September 3 and he shall be prosecuted.

    “The public is warned to be meticulous by making enquiries before concluding any property transaction with an agent.

    “In view of the prevalence of these dubious schemes as evidenced by the growing number of cases being handled by the state regarding victims defrauded of millions of naira by estate agents under the guise of letting out non-existing houses in Lagos, the public is assured that the government is committed to protecting the rights of citizens who fall victim of such fraudulent act, while the perpetrators will be prosecuted.

    “The Justice ministry will collaborate with the police formations to ensure such ongoing cases are investigated and reports are forwarded for prosecution.”

  • ‘Teenager stole my trousers while I was bathing’

    A 19-year-old ticket vendor, Emmanuel Abraham, on Wednesday appeared at an Ikeja Chief Magistrates’ Court, Lagos, for allegedly stealing a pair of trousers from a man bathing.

    The defendant, whose address was not provided, is facing a four-count-charge bordering on conspiracy, breach of the peace and stealing.

    He, however, pleaded not guilty.

    Prosecuting Sergeant Kenrich Nomayo alleged that the teenager entered the bathroom of Mr. Adewale Adewumi while he was bathing and stole his trousers worth N3,000 from where he hung it.

    Read Also: Man burns son to death for allegedly stealing N500

    Nomayo also alleged that the defendant entered the room of Adewumi’s co-tenant, Mr. Samson Ajuwon, and stole iPhone 6 worth N45,000, a Tecno phone valued at N8,000 and another phone worth N40,000

    He added that the teenager stole a Nokia phone worth N5,000, another Tecno phone valued at N7,000 and N180,000 cash.

    The prosecutor said the defendant committed the offences with others at large on August 28 at 7am, at 13, Oredola Street, Ifako Ijaiye, a Lagos suburb.

    He alleged that the defendant conducted himself in a manner likely to cause a breach of the peace by illegally squatting in an abandoned building, smoking a substance suspected to be Indian hemp and posing threat to the community.

    Chief Magistrate Mrs. T. A. Ojo ordered that the defendant be kept in police custody.

    She gave the order after the defendant told the court that he was not aged 19 but 15.

    The alleged offences contravene sections 168, 287 and 411 of the Criminal Law of Lagos State,   2015 (Revised).

    The court adjourned the case till tomorrow.

  • Govt: law to reintroduce monthly clean-up ready soon

    Lagos State Government on Wednesday told residents that an enabling law to permit reintroduction of the monthly sanitation would be enacted soon.

    The government’s resolve was made by the Commissioner for The Environment and Water Resources, Mr. Tunji Bello, during a stakeholders’ meeting with Association of Commodity Market Women and Men led by the Iyaloja General of Nigeria, Chief Folasade Tinubu-Ojo.

    Bello said the invalidation of the exercise by a court sometime ago is a temporary setback, which will be reversed very soon.

    He said the meeting, which also had the Permanent Secretary, Mrs. Ronke Odeneye and Managing Director Lagos State Waste Management Authority (LAWMA) Dr. Muyiwa Gbadegeshin in attendance, was convened to seek the buy-in of market leaders, women and men on the government’s zero tolerance for indiscriminate dumping of waste.

    Read Also: Lawmaker seeks federal help on roads

    Bello said markets which had not engaged the service of PSP waste operators should link up with LAWMA to ensure removal of waste.

    He said in conjunction with the appointed PSP waste operators, a point in the market must be identified where the waste generated should be gathered before being carted away by the PSP operator.

    The commissioner told the market leaders that the government would not hesitate to sanction PSP operators who failed to perform their duties efficiently.

    He said the government would have no option but to shut any market that harbours refuse or dumps same on the road.

    He said as a form of motivation, competitions would be re-introduced to recognise and reward markets adjudged as the cleanest.

    Mrs. Tinubu-Ojo said she will ensure that market sanitation becomes a daily task all market leaders will adopt.

    She said her association was ready to cooperate with the government to adopt the methods proposed, to ensure cleanliness in markets and their environs.

  • In defence of country: The $9.6b judgment

    Nigerians recently received with shock the news that a foreign court had granted an enforcement order for over $9Bn (Nine Billion US Dollars) as compensatory damages in the matter of Process and Industrial Development Ltd v Federal Government of Nigeria (FGN), as a consequence of the determination by an arbitration panel that the Government of Nigeria failed to live up to its contractual obligations.

    This case raises certain fundamental public policy issues which must be addressed, lest the best interests of our nation are wittingly or unwittingly mortgaged. We must also be mindful of the fact that the award represents about 25% of our annual national budget, and the enforcement of this order will have very real consequences on our national development ambitions. My position on this subject should not be taken as an endorsement of Nigeria’s sometimes unpardonable ways of not respecting the sanctity of contracts, but as a consideration of this case as a standalone matter, distinguished both by the nature of the contract, the subtext of its wider implication and the possible unintended consequences 0f enforcing this final award.

    Let us consider first whether or not the Commercial Court of the High Court of Justice of England and Wales has jurisdiction over the enforcement of the arbitral award, and following from that, whether there is a difference between the Seat of Arbitration and the Venue of Arbitration. The Agreement between the Federal Government of Nigeria and the claimant clearly stated that the agreement shall be construed in accordance with the Laws of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. This unambiguously implies that any interpretation of the contract, issues or dispute arising out of the contract shall be resolved in accordance with the Laws of Nigeria. In other words, as far as any issue arises from the entire contract, whether as to the manner or style of performance of the contract, non-performance, recourse to arbitration and enforcement of any award, the laws of the FRN will apply. Parties went further to agree that the Nigeria Arbitration and Conciliation Act CAP A18 Law of the Federation of Nigeria 2004 and its ancillary Rule shall be applied in the resolution of any dispute.

    There is as a matter of statute and precedence, a world of difference between the venue/place of arbitration and seat of arbitration (Lex Arbitiri). While the “place” or venue can be a choice of convenience to the parties, the “seat” is a legal construct which determines the court that has supervisory powers over the conduct of the arbitration. In the extant case, apart from stating that the contract between the parties shall be governed by Nigerian law, the contract equally provided that any arbitration shall be governed by the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, which invariably means that the seat of Arbitration shall be Nigeria. This is because the Nigerian Arbitration and Conciliation Act envisages the supervision of any arbitration under the Act by Nigerian Courts and not English Courts. For the avoidance of doubt, Section 57 of the Act defines court found in the Act to mean the “High Court of a State, the High Court of a Federal Capital Territory, Abuja or the Federal High Court”. The choice of London as the venue of the arbitration is, therefore, a matter of convenience and cannot be construed to mean the seat of arbitration as determined by the Arbitral Tribunal and the judgment of Justice Butcher.

    In the extant case, the contract provides that the venue will be London but the law governing the conduct of the arbitration (seat of arbitration) is the law of Nigeria.  This to my mind is a concerted effort by the parties to clearly determine their terms to the letter. To hold anything to the contrary will amount to a butchering of the Gas Supply and Processing Agreement (GSPA). It is my opinion that the High Court of England has neither the supervisory nor enforcement jurisdiction over the arbitral proceedings as the letters of the GSPA is very clear on that issue. The court with the jurisdiction is the Federal High Court of Nigeria. This position is supported by the ruling of the English courts in Tonicstar v. American Home Assurance Company (2004) EWHC 1234 wherein the Court held that where a contract was made in London, signed in London, to be executed in London, made in accordance with the laws of England, it is to be inferred that the parties intended these provisions to be determined by the English court, but even when there is no implied choice of law, there is a presumption under the Rome Convention that the applicable law is that of the place of business of the party whose performance is characteristic of the contract.

    As to the question of whether under the international law, the High Court England and Wales has jurisdiction to attach the property of another sovereign nation, I submit that where a sovereign state submits to arbitration, the award emanating from the arbitration proceedings cannot be denied on the ground of immunity. However, a waiver of immunity on adjudication is different from the immunity from attachment or execution. Assuming without conceding that the FRN impliedly waived its immunity from adjudication, it did not waive its immunity from attachment or execution. Section 13(2)(b) of the State Immunity Act of England 1978 provides that a sovereign state’s property can only be attached with the state’s consent or where the property is shown to be expressly used for commercial purpose. To this extent, should the judgement eventually stand, the issue of attachment of state property will still have to be addressed. At which point a distinction would be drawn between state assets for state purposes which are beyond the reach of any enforcement judgment and state assets for commercial purposes which may be attached as per the order of a competent court.

    Every contractual dealing contains an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing presuming that the parties will act fairly to each other. As at the time of filing their claim, there was no evidence the claimant had fulfilled their part of the contract. It is the claimant’s position that the construction of a pipeline by the federal government comes in advance of their own obligation to build the gas plant, and it is as a consequence of the federal government’s failure to build that pipeline that the claimant now seeks to walk away with an award of Nine Billion US Dollars.  This is a flawed position that should have been defeated at the earliest stages of the litigation in this matter. Filing a claim against a contractual partner where you yourself are arguably in breach of the same contract is an unacceptable denunciation of the good faith and fair dealing principles that are at the heart of contract law. That both the Arbitration Panel and the British court allowed this position to stand is further reason why we must treat the outcomes of both processes with deserving scepticism.

    The Arbitration Panel determined the damages due to the claimant by calculating the claimant’s projected earnings over twenty (20) years, less capital and operating expenditure, assuming perfect market conditions. The Panel assumed that the yet to be built plant would have been delivered on time and would operate at 93% uptime for the twenty-year duration whilst the average global oil price remained above $100 (One Hundred US Dollars) for the same duration. Everything we know about the volatility of the oil and gas industry in Nigeria leads one to believe that the former assumption is based on nothing if not ephemeral hope. Already, the latter assumption has been rubbished by the real price of crude oil in the global markets since the determination of the final award. Yet, the award calculated using these fundamentally flawed indices still stands. This is neither fair nor just and we ought not to accept it without objection.

    We must all at this time avert our minds to the best options for resolution of this matter in a manner that protects the genuine commercial interests of the claimants without causing any more injury to the Nigerian state and the Nigerian people. Already, there are multiple appeals against both the arbitration award and the enforcement order by the British courts. As it is to the National Assembly, that the constitution of Nigeria grants the power of the purse, it is my opinion that the Assembly ought to be party to all ongoing litigation whether by means of joinder or by initiating fresh action. Whilst we await the final determination of these matters in the court of law, simultaneous diplomatic back-channel discussions must be ongoing. We must approach these talks with all options on the table, recognising the urgency of the situation and dire consequences of failure.

    I am heartened by the fact that the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) has commenced a criminal investigation into the circumstances of the contract between the Federal Government of Nigeria and Process & Industrial Development Ltd.  I hope that this investigation will be conducted expeditiously and with due care so that where anyone is found liable for negligence, recklessness or less than professional conduct such a person will be made to face the full wrath of the law as a deterrent to others. Those who are elected and appointed to represent the interests of the people of Nigeria must recognise that they are rightly held to higher expectations, and they must live up to those expectations.

    Beyond the present matter, there is a need for the National Assembly to begin a comprehensive review of all protocols, treaties, and agreements signed by the country over the years whether or not ratified as it may be time to opt-out of those that may no longer serve our country’s interest. Time sometimes may change the dynamics and make such agreements less favourable to us as a country. Treaties are not in perpetuity and a country cannot be held in bondage by virtue of having signed one. The United States of America has a long history of conducting such reviews and acting in the best interests of the nation. Most recently, by withdrawing from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action known commonly as the Iran nuclear deal and withdrawing also from the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), with the latter now being renegotiated in view of present realities. This is the same approach we must adopt in the best interests of the Nigerian people.

    • Gbajabiamila is Speaker, House of Representatives
  • NIPCO to extend gas facility to 25 off-takers

    NIPCO Plc, one of the distributors of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG),  plans to extend its 10,000metric tons (mt) production to 25 LPG off-takers approved by the Nigeria LNG Limited for distribution across the country.

    Its Managing Director, Sanjay Teotia, who stated this during the conferment of an award by the Nigeria Association of LPG marketers (NALPGAM), on the company in Akwa Ibom State, said the company’s storage and distribution system have been within the context of the Annual Contract Quantity (ACQ) approved by the Nigeria LNG, which, according to him, has been followed to the advantage of stakeholders.

    Teotia, represented by the company’s Assistant General Manager, Corporate Affairs, Lawal Taofeek, said NLNG has maintained global standards in its dealings with its stakeholders, saying the company has been fair to all in the distribution of the product under the ACQ and to  buyers, pointing out that this has contributed to the growth in the use and utilisation of the clean and smoke-free cooking fuel.

    He said: “The company’s efforts in the sector are aimed at improving the gas value chain by providing avenue for storage and dispense to bottling plants’ owners and other ancillary operators in the LPG market. In the course of NIPCO’s intervention, the transport infrastructure and delivery system were improved upon with scores of LPG delivery trucks to bottling plants and over 60 skids inaugurated by the company across the country.

    “Our plant with a combined capacity of over 10,000mt has not only served as veritable channel for storage of the product alone but also distribution to gas markets plants across the nation and servicing of over 25 LPG off-takers approved by the Nigeria LNG Limited.

    “NIPCO’s storage and distribution system has always been within the context of the Annual Contract Quantity (ACQ) approved by the Nigeria LNG which had been meticulously followed to the delight of all stakeholders.

    NALPGAM National President Nosa Ogieva-Okunbor noted that since the entry of NIPCO into the industry in 2009, the face of the business had changed positively with more avenues to source the product for the benefit of end-users.

  • Babcock varsity to reverse medical tourism

    Vice Chancellor of Babcock University Ilishan, Remo Prof Ademola Tayo has said the institution is committed to reversing medical tourism to India and other countries.

    This is as he urged the government to check multiple taxation and allow for flexibility in running educational institutions to promote innovation.

    Speaking at a briefing on Tuesday to commemorate the institution’s 20th anniversary as a private university, and 60th as a higher institution of theological studies, Tayo said Babcock had recorded over 95 per cent success in open heart surgeries and orthorpaedic treatment.

    “Babcock University is determined to contribute to seek ways to stem medical tourism.

    “We have done over 300 successful open heart surgeries since 2015 when the Tri-state Heart Centre started. We have a 95 per cent success rate. In orthorpeadics, we are doing total knee replacement surgery and spine surgery,” he said.

    Apart from medicine, Tayo said Babcock was impacting the Nigerian society in many other ways, including through promoting food security, research, and others.

    He however lamented the multiple taxes the University has to pay to government, calling for a change given the institution’s role in providing education, which is a social service.

    Tayo also called for relaxation of rules guiding the operations of Tertiary institutions, saying it would allow for creativity and innovation in the academia.

    He said: “Too many stringent rules do not bring about innovation. America is very great today because they allow innovation. But here it is stifled. Let the government be flexible so we can do this just like we see happen in developed world.”

    Activities to celebrate the institution’s anniversary, which has as theme: “The Journey of Grace”; include spiritual beginning on September 14, a programme to thank  God; medical outreach for host communities (September 15); special lecture and speech (September 17); Almost Day (September 19), among others

     

  • Insecurity hangs over ABU

    Although the three final year students of Law at the Ahmadu Bello University (ABU), Zaria, who were abducted last week have been freed, the campus is still enveloped in fear. There are accusations and counter-accusations between the management and students over insecurity on the campus. Students are sad that bandits, who ply the Abuja-Kaduna Road, have extended their dragnet to them. ABIODUN JAMIU, 200-Level Political Science student, Usmanu Danfodiyo University, Sokoto (UDUS) reports:

    For students of the Ahmadu Bello University (ABU), Zaria, it was sweet relief when the news of the release of their abducted colleagues filtered in. Their joy knew no bounds.

    Despite the euphoria that greeted the release, there is papable fear of insecurity in the air.

    Though the management said it has put a new system in place to tackle insecurity, some students, who spoke to CAMPUSLIFE, said there are still unreported cases of petty theft, robbery and sexual harassments, among others, on campus.

    Maryam Bello, Umar Sagir, and Fatima Jalingo – all final year students of Law – were kidnapped alongside others on their way to Zaria from Abuja, where they had gone to raise funds for a dinner to be hosted by their colleagues.

    Painfully, families of the abductees admitted that they paid hefty ransom, contrary to a police report that no amount was paid and that the release was due to their effort.

    Though the management claimed to have provided some logistics support in rescuing them, it blamed the trio for not obtaining approval from the authority before embarking on the ill-fated journey.

    The management’s position was supported by ABU Students’ Representative Council (SRC), which said students were supposed to get permits before stepping out of the campus.

    Students of ABU, who spoke to CAMPUSLIFE, said it was about time the management improved the university’s security. They called on the government to rise up to the challenge posed by insecurity which has made them easy targets for bandits on the Abuja-Kaduna Road, almost daily.

    Will this ever end? ABU students ask

    Contrary to the management’s claim, a 200-Level student of Social Studies, Alade Jamiu (not real name), argued that security on campus was not tight during the late hours compared to daytime. More worrisome, according to Jamiu, is that students caught committing atrocities are  given a slap on the wrist.

    He said: “There are petty thefts in the hostels. There is no regard for place of worship. Management treats with kid gloves students  who have committed one infraction or another.  The next moment, you see such students back on campus and having a swell time.’’

    Jamiu chided some security officials for going out of their way to harass female students, in the guise of conducting security checks.

    “At night, they (security) don’t do their work as they should. Imagine a security official putting on mufti and chasing girls all over the place,” he said

    A student of Chemistry Education, who simply identified himself as Bola, supported Jamiu.

    “Security on campus is still porous to some extent,” Bola argued.

    “Most students may think that the security (on campus) is fit, but there are cases of petty theft here and there. There is no strict measure against theft in hostels. Moreover, there is no strict law on whosoever enters the school by foot; there are elements that can easily bypass the security and unleash mayhem on students.”

    Muhammad Yahaya, a third year Political Science student, also agreed with the duo, albeit with a little digression.

    “Security in ABU is fairly good. They (management) just need to recruit more security officials”.

    He continued: “Although I have never lived off campus, I hear cases of phone snatching, robbery and sexual harassment.”

    Yahaya noted that students who live in houses around the school, especially in Samaru, where the institution is located, appear most vulnerable.

    Olayemi Sulaiman, 300-Level student of Economics, lamented that kidnapping in ABU have become a recurring decimal, with the Abuja-Kaduna Highway as a major hideout for criminals.

    According to him, many of his colleagues have escaped kidnapping, robberies and other forms of atrocities on that route by a hair’s breath.

    “Here in Ahmadu Bello University, threats of kidnapping and armed robbery have become a major fear among students who travel to or from school. It is quite shameful to hear that students are at the receiving end of the failure of the authorities to tame insecurity.

    A final year Mass Communication undergraduate Tijani Hassan, noted that the security situation on Kaduna-Abuja Highway has became more complicated in recent times, putting the lives and properties of students and workers at stake.

    He said: “The security situation along Kaduna-Abuja highway has become alarming in the past one year. However, sadly, we (students) have also become the latest victims. Our parents will have to desperately look for money as ransom for criminals that have now turned their attention on us.”

    He continued: “If not that the parents of the abducted students were able to get money, who knows what might have happened to them? These are students preparing to leave for Law School. It would have been a total disaster not only for ABU, but the whole country.”

    For Uthman Isa, a final-year student of Law, the rising wave of killing and kidnappings must have political undertones; the more reason it has become difficult to tame.

    “The scourge of insecurity ravaging the country is, to a very large extent, coloured with politics that one would wonder why it has become very difficult for the government to find solutions.”

    Isa pleaded for government’s openness in the fight against insecurity. He urged a reform of the country’s security apparatus, asking the masses to continue to challenge the authorities that hold the nation’s security in trust for them.

    Umar Aisha, another 200-Level student of Political Science, called on the authorities to tackle the hostility along Kaduna-Abuja highway head on.

    She said: “The security situation in the country is very scary. I call on the authorities concerned to take a serious measure on this Kaduna-Abuja highway because things are getting out of hand. The volume of crimes being committed on that route is quite unfortunate.”

    Olayemi said the scourge is aided by the unstable economy, coupled with high rate of unemployed youths.

    Vigilance, the watchword, says management

    The university’s Director, Public Affair Dr Ismai’la Shehu, has reiterated management’s unending battle against insecurity on and off the school’s campuses.

    Shehu recalled how the management rose to the occasion, despite that the three kidnapped ABU students ‘ trip was illegal.

    “Ours is to reassure ourselves as parents that the security of our students is key,” Shehu noted.

    “When they (students) are going on any official trip, we always ensure they are given adequate protection. For instance, if they are going on excursion or to any other place that has to do with their academics, we provide them with security.

    “Those who were kidnapped went on their own volition. I’m sure you  know the (insecurity) situation in the country; and the university is also a part of the larger society. Despite that they went on their own, the university played a major role in securing their freedom. We could not have disowned them simply because of their action. Management had to join hands with the stakeholders and the efforts yielded their freedom.”

    Shehu said aside the school having a competent security unit, students should be vigilant.

    “There is a security unit that works 24/7 to ensure security of lives and properties in the university campuses. That on a routine.

    “We have a reasonable number of security personnel, well trained to combat insecurity. But the general thing is to be watchful and security conscious. The dean, students’ affairs and university management always enlighten the students on the need to be security conscious.”

     Official permission a must, says SRC

    Corroborating the management, SRC President, Usman Waziri, noted that the permission from the school is a must, if students must embark on an official journey.

    Waziri said: “There are students who travel from school for excursions, competitions and all that. There are also students who travel from their parents’homes to visit siblings, friends or for mere partying.

    “For those in the second category, the Students’ Union and the university will not be held responsible. However, for those travelling from school, they need to apply for approval letters from the management. Once this is done, the university will direct one or two security officials to accompany them all through the journey.‘’

    Waziri added that both management and SRC offer security tips to students at the beginning of every session.

    He continued: ‘’At the beginning of every session, we usually have what we call a Central University Orientation. It is a forum where management educate students in every area of their lives, including how to safeguard their personal effects in and off campus.

    “Generally, the security situation on campus is quite impressive. We have a security unit that is up to the task. We also have local hunters  who monitor the periphery of the university. Management has also mounted a police post in ABU Phase 2, all to complement security.

    “For an individual to come into the campus, you must show evidence of your studentship.’’

  • Woman whose school was demolished by UNILAG gets N50,000 relief

    One year after taking refuge in a church, following the loss of her school which was built on a piece of land belonging to the University of Lagos (UNILAG), sold to her by unscrupulous locals, a school owner got respite from a group of educators, reports Kofoworola Belo-Osagie.

    On Tuesday, last week, the Concerned Parents and Educators (CPE) Network, a Facebook group of over 100,000 educators and parents, founded by Mrs Yinka Ogunde, donated classroom furniture, books and other items to low-cost schools under the Association for Formidable Educational Development (AFED) across Lagos.

    The donation also came with N50,000, which Mrs Ogunde requested should be given to one school truly in need of funds.

    Last Friday, AFED National President, Mr Orji Kanu, and Alphasea Consult CEO, Mrs Esther Ifejola Dada, handed over the N50,000 to the Proprietor of Solid Rock Primary School, Iwaya, Yaba, Mrs Francisca Owolabi, whose school was demolished in 2017, when the University of Lagos (UNILAG) reclaimed its land encroached upon by its host community.

    Mrs Dada, who was the immediate past AFED President, urged Mrs Owolabi to put the money to good use to justify her selection as a recipient.

    “On behalf of CPE and AFED, we are giving you this N50,000. CPE members gathered this money apart from the materials they gave us for schools. It will please us that you make good use of it and we can return to thank CPE,” she said.

    On his part, Orji thanked CPE for coming to the aid of private schools that serve low-income members of the community as a result of the low fees they charge. He expressed joy that members of the public were beginning to appreciate the work AFED-member schools were doing in the society.

    “We handed over to our member who had a growing school that was demolished so she can get a facility from the bank.  We are beginning to get attention for what we are doing.  The only thing we have promised is to ensure good use of the funds. We will come back to you in two weeks to know what you have done with it,” he said.

    Mrs Owolabi was overjoyed at the gesture, which she said would contribute towards renting a place for the school’s use as the 2019/2020 session begins next week.

    “I am so glad for this gift from Mrs Ogunde and CPE.  I say may the Almighty God bless them forever,” she said, overjoyed.

    Mrs Owolabi said after losing her property, she relocated to a church but was given quit notice as the 2018/2019 academic session ended in July.  She said the population of the school, which charges between N11,000 and N15,000 for a term, dropped from over 100 to 30/40 because of the crisis.

    “The land was sold to me by omo onile but UNILAG said it owned the land so the school was demolished in August 2017.  Since then I had to relocate to a church where I paid rent of N200,000. But they said they wanted to use the church.  At the end of the 2018/2019 session in July, they locked me out.”

    Mrs Owolabi said she would order furniture with the funds as well as complete work on securing a loan from the bank.

    “I still have a long way to go but this will help. I will start with chairs and tables.  AFED President has already linked me up with a bank to get a loan. If the bank answers me, I will be able to pay for the place we have found.  I wanted N500,000 but the bank can only give me N300,000,” she said.

  • Makinde to open six model schools

    To commemorate his first 100 days in office, Oyo State Governor Seyi Makinde will inaugurate six model schools executed under the Universal Basic Education Commission (UBEC) and the state Universal Basic Education Board (SUBEB) intervention projects across the three senatorial districts of the state.

    Also, the governor has promised speedy completion of all ongoing UBEC-FG/SUBEB projects in the state before the year ends, assuring that pupils across the state would begin to enjoy a better lease in their basic educational pursuits.

    Making the disclosures, Oyo SUBEB Chairman, Dr Nureni Adeniran, said the move was part of the government’s efforts to provide quality education to indigent pupils in the state.

    “The board has ensured that the contractors complete at least six of the ongoing projects, which are ready for commissioning by His Excellency,” he said.

    The model schools, equipped with modern facilities are located in Ibadan, Oyo and Oke-Ogun region of the state.

    The facilities in the schools include classrooms, sickbays, science laboratories, computer rooms, libraries and halls.

    Adeniran attributed the fast pace of completion of the previously abandoned school projects within 100 days of Makinde’s administration to the governor’s commitment to the development of education in the state.

    “I can assure you that Governor Seyi Makinde’s administration would ensure that education is not only made free for pupils across this state, but would make the schools worth attending for the pupils. Our pro-activeness brought about this finished works. We ensured these projects are completed by the contractors on site”, he said.

    The schools to be inaugurated include, Elekuro Junior High School, Elekuro (Ona-Ara Local Government), St. Mathias Primary school, Orogun, (Akinyele Local Government Area), Community Primary School, Idi-osan (Ibadan North West Local Government Area), Baptist Primary school, Isokun (Oyo-East Local Government Area), Muslim Community Junior High School, Igbeti (Olorunsogo Local Government Area) and Ofiki Grammar School Ofiki, (Atisbo Local Government Area).