Tag: Nigerians

  • Insecurity: Don’t give up, Mark tells Nigerians

    President of the Senate, David Mark, yesterday urged Nigerians to renew their faith in the unity of the nation irrespective of the current security and social-economic challenges.

    Mark spoke during a church service to mark his wife, Helen, 64th birthday.

    The service was conducted at the St. Mulumba Chaplaincy, Apo, Abuja.

    He enjoined Nigerians to remain steadfast and believe in the prospect of the country to overcome her challenges.

    According to him: “We should continue to be our brothers’ keeper; we have gone this far and we should not wish away our strength of togetherness.

    “God created us to be together as a nation. We are all made by God and we shall all stand before Him to give account of what we have done here on earth.

    “So, as a people, we should learn to be tolerant and love one another.”

    Mark, in a statement by his Chief Press Secretary, Paul Mumeh, also admonished Nigerians to eschew violence in any form, saying, “no matter how aggrieved a man may be, resorting to violence will only escalate the situation.”

    He commended his wife, Helen, for her virtues and love for the family.

    The Senate President said: “We decided to celebrate her birthday with a Holy Mass in our church to thank God.

    “She has been a strong pillar behind me all these years. She has been very supportive and an ideal help-mate.

    “The truth is that, if there should be people to talk of God’s goodness, my family should be in the forefront. God has been so kind and faithful to us.”

    Rev. Father Innocent Jooji, in his homily, urged the congregation to be thankful to God in all situations.

    He stated that God is compassionate and wants His children to live together with a heart full of praise and tolerance.

    He canvassed for oneness and forgiveness among the brethren.

    He noted that the best way to celebrate Mrs. Helen Mark’s birthday was through a Holy Mass.

    He reminded the people to continue to join the Senate President’s family in prayers in the years ahead.

     

  • Nigerians urged to assist the needy

    A passionate appeal has gone out to wealthy Nigerians to inculcate the habit of providing for the needy in our society going by the alarming and escalating level of poverty in the country.

    The founder of a non-governmental organization “Save The Soul of The Needy International Foundation”, Mr. Emmanuel Udogba Ubah, whose foundation is saddled with the responsibility to accommodate and rehabilitate the destitute, the homeless and the indigent in our midst, re-emphasized that it is the will of God for the blessed to be a blessing unto others.

    Speaking during a media tour of a Rehabilitation Village located at Oke-Afo Badagry Express Way built by him to accommodate orphans, the indigent and the needy, the philanthropist recalled the vision given to him by God in a dream four years ago to take care of the needy and the Church of God, which led to the establishment of his foundation to accomplish the vision.

    He explained that the foundation has the objectives to accommodate the destitute, the homeless and the less privileged; to provide for motherless babies homes; and to train the indigent with skill acquisition to make them useful and fulfilled.

    Mr. Ubah said his vision is to take the NGO nationwide by establishing rehabilitation homes in other parts of the country, and therefore urged corporate institutions and wealthy Nigerians to partner the foundation to cater for the needy in our society.

    He stated that currently the NGO is embarking on a wide campaign to woo more partners into the venture.

  • Nigerians, others drown on way to Italy

    Nigerians, others drown on way to Italy

    Italian media yesterday detailed how migrants, including Nigerians attempting to cross into Italy perished off the Libyan coast

     

    Thirty-one migrants, including nine women, drowned off the coast of Libya during an attempted crossing to Italy according to survivors who managed to complete the journey, Italian media reported.

    A dinghy carrying 53 migrants capsized on Friday evening, and witnesses said 31 of those who had been thrown off it drowned in the accident. Some of them are believed to be Nigerians.

    The twenty-two survivors, who come from Nigeria, Gambia, Benin and Senegal, said the dinghy had capsized after three days at sea. They were rescued by a passing merchant ship and taken to Lampedusa Island, the reports said.

    Italian Interior Minister Angelo Alfano called for human traffickers who shuttle migrants across the sea to Italy to be stopped on Sunday, after 31 boat people drowned during an attempted crossing.

    “The traffic of human beings must end. We need to stop the merchants of death. The deaths off the Libyan coast and the terrible stories told by the survivors show the need for a real collaboration between countries to stop this string of tragic events,” Alfano said.

    He called for “the network of collaboration to be strengthened with the countries where the migratory flows begin” and slammed “the wicked commerce of men who place their trust in the death merchants, who are but cynical profiteers of a state of emergency.”

    As the number of boat immigrants attempting the crossing soars in the good weather, rescuers saved another 450 people trying to reach Italy on Friday and Saturday, increasing tensions at the already crowded refugee centre on the island.

    Another 92 migrants — including 16 women — were rescued Sunday morning in the Strait of Sicily after their boat got into difficulty.

    Since 1999, more than 200,000 people have arrived on Lampedusa — which is closer to North Africa than Italy — making it, along with the Greece-Turkey border, one of the biggest gateways for undocumented migrants and refugees into the European Union.

    In nearby Malta, 112 migrants were saved from their drifting dinghy overnight Saturday in a 13-hour operation during which eight of those rescued were airlifted to hospital by helicopter for urgent medical attention.

    That group — which included 20 women and four children — was suffering from exhaustion, dehydration and sun stroke, a Maltese army spokesman said.

    The Pope arrived on a Sicilian island to pray for boat migrants who have died trying to land there – at the same time as nearly 200 immigrants from Africa were being detained.

    Pope Francis was to throw a wreath of flowers into the sea off Lampedusa in memory of those who have drowned over the years.

    The Vatican said he had been “profoundly touched” by the flood of immigration to the tiny island.

    Just as his plane landed on the island in his first trip outside Rome, a large group of immigrants was being escorted into the port on a coast guard boat.

    All were described as in “good” condition before they were taken away by bus to be processed.

    The latest arrivals bring the number of migrants to land on Malta in July to 880 — an all-time record for a month — while 1,200 people in total have landed on the island so far this year.

    Tensions between the migrants, who are held in overcrowded detention facilities while their status is processed, and residents are frequent.

    Pope Francis was also due to meet groups of immigrants who have successfully made the crossing.

    His grandparents emigrated to Argentina from Italy, and as archbishop of Buenos Aires he denounced the exploitation of migrants as “slavery” and said those who did nothing to help them were complicit by their silence.

    The anti-immigration Northern League party is again fanning the flames of racism in Italy, just days after a plea from Pope Francis for greater tolerance in the predominantly Catholic country.

    The pope last Monday flew on his first trip outside Rome to the tiny of island of Lampedusa to “cry for the dead” migrants and refugees who perish trying to cross the Mediterranean to Europe.

    He urged people to heed “the cries of others” on a trip that humanitarian organisations and Italian parliament speaker Laura Boldrini, a former United Nations refugee worker, hailed as “historic”.

    But some politicians, who are little inclined to defend secularism in Italy on issues such as crucifixes in churches, abortion or gay marriage, called for greater “autonomy” from the Church.

    Fabrizio Cicchitto, a deputy from Silvio Berlusconi’s People of Freedom party, said there was a difference between “religious preaching” and “a state handling a difficult, complex and insidious phenomenon”.

    Lawmakers from the Northern League have gone further, calling on the pontiff to provide “money and land to house immigrants” who land in Europe.

    The debate has taken a sinister twist after the deputy speaker of the Italian Senate, Roberto Calderoli, a leading member of the Northern League, compared Italy’s first black minister to an orangutan.

    The remarks against Integration Minister Cecile Kyenge have been condemned by most politicians, with Prime Minister Enrico Letta speaking of a “shameful chapter” for the country and President Giorgio Napolitano saying they were an example of “barbarism”.

    Calderoli said the jibe was intended as a “joke” and added insult to injury saying he “liked animals a lot”.

    The Northern League on Monday even decided to capitalise on the publicity it is receiving and announced it would hold a demonstration against illegal immigration in Turin on September 7.

    Kyenge, a doctor and an Italian citizen of Congolese origin, says she has received daily threats since being nominated.

    Her reaction has been low-key but she has said the slur shows “a lack of knowledge of others and of the phenomenon of migration, as well as an absence of culture of immigration”.

    The centre-left Democratic Party has been equally critical and leading senator Luigi Zanda said Kyenge’s proposal on a law to allow children of immigrants to acquire Italian citizenship should now be adopted as quickly as possible.

    Historically a land of emigration, Italy’s foreign-born population has increased exponentially over the last two decades ever since the wave of immigration from Albania in 1992.

    Since the revolutions in Tunisia and Libya there has also been an increased influx of migrant workers from sub-Saharan Africa transiting through these countries.

    In 10 years, between 2002 and 2012, the share of immigrants in the population has tripled to reach 7.9 percent, according to figures from the labour ministry.

    At a meeting in Rome on Monday, Letta and his Maltese counterpart Joseph Muscat called for greater assistance from the European Union to manage undocumented migration.

    Muscat, who last week threatened to send migrants back to Libya, said the situation was “unsustainable” since there were no EU rules on the “pushback and push forward of migrants” to other parts of the EU.

    A former member of the Christian Democratic party, Letta said it was “fundamental to apply the pope’s appeal launched in Lampedusa: ‘Never again’.”

    The United Nations says thousands of people have drowned in recent years trying to reach Italian shores and 40 have died so far this year.

    Italy has come under fire from groups as diverse as the Vatican and the European Commission for its strict new anti-immigration laws, which were passed in early July.

    Under the legislation, illegal immigrants are liable to pay a fine of 10,000 euros (£8,700; $14,200) and can now be detained by the authorities for up to six months.

    In addition, people who knowingly house undocumented migrants can now face up to three years in prison.

    The new law also permits the formation of unarmed citizen patrol groups to help police keep order.

    The European Commission is investigating the new laws to see if they comply with existing EU legislation on immigration.

    “Italy is absolutely not a racist country. We just want to be sure that the immigrants who arrive on our land want to be here to work, not to make crimes,” says Paolo Grimaldi, an MP for the right-wing Northern League.

    Mr Grimaldi, whose party leader, Interior Minister Roberto Maroni, ushered the new law through parliament, firmly believes Italy is facing an emergency.

    With nearly 37,000 immigrants arriving on their shores last year, mostly via boats from Libya and Tunisia, many Italians agree.

    “There are too many people. You see in the city, on the streets in Milan, two million immigrants, I think,” says one Milanese man, who did not want to give his name.

    “I want to help people who are poorer than me, but I want to know where they come from and what they are going to do,” says Martina, a 23-year-old Northern League supporter. “It is better if they come here legally.”

    According to Saskia Sassen, an expert on European immigration at Columbia University in New York, Italy’s new laws could be the beginning of “a catastrophic phase” for not only migrants but also Italian citizens.

    “This law really alters the landscape by criminalising the violation,” she says.

    “In the past you were in violation of the law. That doesn’t mean you were a criminal. This law means if you break the law, now you are considered a criminal. That’s a big deal.”

    Mr Grimaldi readily admits that almost no illegal immigrants would be able to pay a 10,000-euro fine. In fact, he says, that is the point.

    European Union laws oblige all 25 countries party to the Schengen Agreement, which allows passport-free travel across the area, to allow illegal immigrants to make two “mistakes”, and the new Italian law makes such “mistakes” more likely.

    “We want to expel these illegal immigrants to their country of provenance,” Mr Grimaldi says.

    “If they have already been arrested for something before, if they don’t pay the fine, we will have recidivism.”

    The immigrant will have made two “mistakes”, and “so then we can make the expulsion”.

    Italy issues very few visas to people who are already living in the country, and demand for work permits from potential immigrants greatly outstrips supply.

    It quickly becomes a Catch-22 situation – illegal immigrants who have no visa are unable to get a job; those without a job are unable to get a visa.

    As a result, both illegal and legal migrants have become an increasingly obvious presence on the streets of Italian cities.

     

  • ‘How we saved Nigerian  lawyers’practice in UK’

    ‘How we saved Nigerian lawyers’practice in UK’

    THE amendment of the 1999 Constitution has begun apace, with the Senate and House of Representatives voting on some key issues.

    Both chambers took opposing positions on two major issues, which many believe require urgent amendment – minimum wage and local government autonomy. The Senate voted in favour of removing the minimum wage from the Exclusive Legislative List and transferring it to the Concurrent List. It voted against autonomy for the 774 Local Government Areas.

    The House of Representatives voted against both issues. It voted for the retention of minimum wage as a federal affair, and called for autonomy for local governments.

    Although both houses are expected to set up a harmonisation committee to straighten the areas of differences, observers believe that the development has reawakened the argument on whether the nation is ready to confront its fears and go for restructuring.

    Item 34 of the Exclusive Legislative List confers on the National Assembly the exclusive powers to legislate on labour matters including prescribing a national minimum wage.

    It was pursuant to this provision that the National Assembly enacted the 2011 National Minimum Wage Act, fixing the minimum wage at N18,000.

    Section 7(1) of the Constitution provides for a local government system with its officials democratically elected. The second arm of the provision makes the establishment, structure, composition, finance of the local governments dependent on the state governments.

    The opponents of local governments autonomy said the provision for a joint state/local government account, into which funds standing to the credit of both levels of government are paid, allows for a form of control of the management of the funds allocated to local governments.

    Those seeking autonomy for the third tier of government argue that the retention of the status quo negates the principles of true federalism and further supports the call for a restructuring of the country.

    They also argued that the Senate’s decision to liberalise labour issues, by moving the minimum wage to the Concurent List will reduce the current over centralisation of national affairs in a supposed federal state.

    To them, the provision of a national minimum wage in the Constitution, and some similar other provisions, conflict with the true meaning of federation in practice.

    Their argument is anchored on the fact that the arrangement that allows an overbearing federal structure on the state government and the state government’s dominance of the local government do not reflect the country as a true federation as defined by the Supreme Court in the case of Attorney-General of Abia State vs the Attorney-General of the Federation and 33 others (2006) 7 SC (part 1) page 51 at 72.

    In the decision, the Supreme Court described federalism, both as legal and political concepts, to imply an association of states, formed for certain and defined common purpose or purposes, with the states retaining a large portion of their original independence and autonomy.

    Some are opposed to the approach to constitution amendment. They argued that the way the National Assembly is going about the amendment suggests that the country is yet to decide on what it wants.

    They described the approach as a timid attempt at tackling the nation’s fundamental problems.

    In particular, they queried the rationale behind the provision of pension for Senate President, Speaker of the House of Representatives and their deputies by a National Assembly whose members’ pay had been described as scandalous, and second to none on earth.

    They argued that a National Assembly that means well should be bothered by the social and economic rights and privileges provided for in Chapter Two of the Constitution which have remained nonjusticeable over 50 years after independence.

    Critics said until there is a major push for genuine constitution amendment, the current crop of leaders, who see the constitution review process as a routine project and an avenue of squandering public funds, would persist in their deception and only amend the Constitution to confer undue advantage on them.

    Lawyers, including Prof Ben Nwabueze (SAN), Tunji Abayomi, Dr. Albert Tvon, Ikechukwu Ikeji and the Chairman, Nigerian Bar Association (NBA), Ikeja, Lagos, Monday Ubani said the nation requires a new approach to constitution making and a departure from the current window dressing embarked upon by the National Assembly.

    Prof Nwabueze suggested that the country do away with the 1999 Constitution and in its place, enact “a peoples Constitution.”

    The constitutional law expert spoke in Awka, the Anambra State capital, at the weekend during the presentation of his autobiography: “Ben Nwabueze: His life, works and times.”

    He argued that the 1999 Constitution can not pass as the people’s Supreme Law because its source of supremacy is not the Nigerian people.

    “What we have as the 1999 Constitution is not the Supreme Law. What is its source of supremacy? The military? No! It can’t be. The source of supremacy everywhere in the world is the people.”

    He insisted that the people could only provide for themselves a true Constitution through a national conference that will fashion out a constitution that is truly sourced from the people.

    “The constitution so framed will then be out through a referendum. That is the challenge before this country,” Nwabueze said.

    Abayomi argued that both chambers were engaging in an exercise in futility.

    To him, no amount of amendment would confer legitimacy on a Constitution foisted on the people by a departing military, without powers to so act.

    In separate July 17 letters to the Senate President David Mark and House Speaker Aminu Tambuwal, Abayomi said: “Democracy is based on the principle of self-government. The foundation of such self-government is always found in a Constitution made by the people. And a valid Constitution is always presumed to predate government, which again, is deemed to be its consequence.

    “A Legislature, which is presumed to represent the people’s will is at the core of democracy principally because it is presumed to act as the agent of the people in realising and affirming their will.

    “Legislative authority is only valid if it is based on the consent of the people and if it is used to promote their desire,” Abayomi said.

    He queried the powers of the National Assembly to make Constitution for the people. He argued that every attempt to amend the current constitution by the law makers will always end in failure.

    “It is, indeed, sad that the National Assembly under the present leadership is always inclined to surface dress national problem at high abnormal cost that grows out of largely selfish desires instead of fundamental sacrifices that will honour today and enhance tomorrow.”

    Abayomi argued that as the law making delegates of the people, the National Assembly could only pass a law enabling the people to give to themselves a Constitution; set the terms, parameters and modalities to aid the people in the task of producing their Constitution.

    Tvon argued that the call for a change in the constitutional reality should not be limited to political demand for restructuring, but must include economic demand for greater equality and ability to meet the second generation of rights as enunciated by the United Nation’s Declaration on Human Rights.

    “One key question here is in what direction should the economy be driven? What should be the role of the state in socio-economic planning?

    Aside from the core issues of restructuring and true federalism, which the Senate has failed to address in its constitutional amendment efforts till date, there is the need to address the people’s expectation that. the state has the responsibility of meeting its social and moral obligation to its people,” Tvon said.

    He wondered how the Nigerian state hopes to command the people’s patriotic spirit when it has continued to fail in its responsibilities.

    Ikeji did not only fault the subtle support the Senators have given to under age marriage in the name of religion, he argued that their refusal of the Senate to vote for true federalism is a set back on the nation’s march towards proper democracy.

    “The phrase ‘people’s constitution’ is not a mere law. It connotes the source of all laws, pretending that it must have a direct deliberate input by the people. The fundamental issue to address in the Nigerian constitution is the question of legitimacy.

    “The Nigerian Constitution tells a lie against itself and the Nigerian people and except this is addressed, we are merely deceiving ourselves. The Constitution lied when it said, in its preamble, that the people of Nigeria made it.

    “It is public knowledge that the Constitution is a Decree, more specifically, Decree No. 24 of 1999 made directly by the military regime of General Abdusalam Abubakar who just imposed it on us without reference to our views.

    “The Constitution also lied when it referred to Nigeria as the Federal Republic of Nigeria. We all know that Nigeria is presently far from being a federation as it is more of unitary government exerting strong controls from the centre in Abuja than from the constituent States.

    “The present Nigerian structure has stronger centripetal forces than centrifugal forces. So, any constitutional review or amendment that does not address these fundamental flaws is an exercise in deception and futility.

    “To midwife a people’s Constitution, we must engage in a deliberate constitutional conference, more like a sovereign national conference whose results shall be subject to a referendum.

    The present Constitution lacks authochthoneity since it lacks the imprimatur of the people,” Ikeji said.

    Ubani described the present process of constitutional amendment going on as a “patch patch mechanism” incapable to effecting the much needed restructuring.

    “The people’s constitution can only be midwifed by the pple themselves, not what is presently going on where the people’s wish and aspirations are at variance with the legislators in the country

    “Their amendments and proposals rather deepen democracy will destroy it. “Any amendment of the of the constitution that does not reflect the peoples’ wish is null and void and of no effect. The constitution being the Supreme Law of the land must proceed from the people.

    “A sovereign national conference out of which a constituent assembly will spring from to draw up a people’s constitution will be best way to produce the peoples’ constitution. For example now, we are wasting our time, money and energy in this amendment process. It will not take us far and that is the fact,” Ubani said.

     

  • NOA advises Nigerians on national symbols

    The Gombe State office of the National Orientation Agency (NOA) has begun a tour of public and private organisations to monitor the patriotic use of the national flag.

    NOA Director in the state, Mr. Ado Solomon, who started the exercise last Thursday, said it would be continuous.

    He restricted his first inspection tour to public and private organisations as well as schools in Gombe township and environs.

    The NOA director urged the residents to respect the national flag and other symbols.

    He said the agency had observed that most Nigerians were not patriotic, because the national flag was either absent in most organisations or was left flying in tatters and unkempt in others.

     

     

     

     

     

  • Again, Nigerians say ‘No’

    Again, Nigerians say ‘No’

    WHAT on earth would make the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) seek to exhume the plan to redesign the naira so soon after Nigerians resoundingly rejected it? The pull of exigency or the lure of institutional hubris? Whichever it is, the attempt by the CBN to revisit the naira redesign issue at this time is both inexplicable and wrong.

    Ten months ago, precisely on September 20, 2012, President Goodluck Jonathan had, in the height of the opposition to the measure ordered the apex bank to halt its earlier announced currency restructuring to allow for further “enlightenment and consultation”. We consider it unimaginable that the CBN would, in less than one year, seek to upturn the order. Worse however is that the apex bank has remained far less convincing on a project expected to gulp billions of taxpayers’ funds now than it was 10 months ago.

    We consider it worrisome that Sanusi Lamido Sanusi’s CBN wants the naira redesign project so bad – so bad it would go against the grain of public opinion as it is wont to do. Clearly, this is the only way to make sense of the statement credited to him while appearing before members of the House of Representatives Committee on Banking and Currency last week that “one of the reasons we wanted to have a restructuring of the redesign of the currency a few months ago was because many of our notes had been in existence for upward of eight or even 10 years… the best practice is that within a period of five to eight years you redesign the currency, after which counterfeiters tend to catch up”. That was hubris at best.

    Why are Nigerians opposed to the idea of wholesale redesign of the naira? This, unfortunately, is where the CBN chooses to misrepresent the argument. Just as nobody questions the exercise as the prerogative of the CBN; the issue is the apex bank’s unconvincing statement on the relationship between the cost of the exercise and the benefits. Aside being a drain on the public till, it promises to be a major source of capital flight. We do not see anything of the so-called best practices argument as obviating these facts. Indeed, we suspect that the only reason the idea keeps popping up is because the CBN has inexhaustible funds to play with.

    Shouldn’t the nation by now have learnt enough from such costly experimentations? The lesson of the nation’s romance with Securency International, manufacturer of polymer notes scandal is still fresh. A bribe of N750 million was said to have been paid to some Nigerian officials by the Australian firm. Whereas their foreign counterparts have been convicted, their Nigerian accomplices are walking free. That is not even all; only recently it was revealed that the polymer was a far poorer alternative to what was previously in use.

    Is someone again attempting to lead the nation by the nose?

    The point is that the CBN admits that only a fraction of the processed notes in circulation is fake. It’s percentage of fake notes processed was given as 3.9 per cent in 2007, six percent in 2008, 8.4 percent in 2009, 7.4 per cent in 2010, 5.4 per cent in 2011 and 8.4 percent in 2012. If this is the case, why go the whole hog of redesign?

    Shouldn’t the addition of extra security features have sufficed if it is about curbing the menace of counterfeiting? Wouldn’t that be far less costly?

    At this time, Nigerians ought to worry about the apex bank’s fixation with currency restructuring. Redesigning the naira seems to us as the least of the problems that the CBN has to contend with; if the apex bank is in doubt of where to start, a good place is the current out-of-reach cost of funds.

  • Royal Rugby in Rivers

    Royal Rugby in Rivers

    God bless Patrick White, wherever the old contrarian chose to relocate to after his earthly sojourn. It was the great Australian novelist and 1973 Nobel laureate in Literature who once famously described rugby as a game of thugs writhing in mud. It was an unfriendly dig at the English Upper Class. Rugby, with its echoes of manliness and muscular menace, its refined violence and Public School pabulum, is a game very dear to the English upper crust. Unlike football, you can take rugby out of England but you cannot take the Englishness out of rugby.

    There is rugby and there is rugby. It appears that the old Australian curmudgeon spoke too soon. He should have watched the royal mud show in Rivers, Nigeria. Something new always comes out of Africa. Perhaps due to the peculiar prehistoric configuration and wiring of the Blackman’s brains, it is easy to convert tragedy to comedy. In a life marked by unremitting adversity and misfortune, laughter is the best medicine and superior political therapy. The alternative is sure suicide This is why after spiritual mountebanks, professional comedians and other comic clowns are among the highest paid Nigerians.

    Hip, hip, hurray! Welcome dear readers to the land of hippos and hipsters. It is called Hippotamia. It is a muddy swamp teeming with manatees, mermaids, mangrove mongoose, mammy waters, ocean going marsupials and other more menacing amphibious mammals. Here when thugs writhe in mud, they are engaged in political rugby which is a game more deadly and dangerous than the original. You can take the wrestling away from the mud wrestler but you cannot take away the mud. And when mud is thrown real hard, some of it is bound to stick.

    In political rugby, the rule of engagement is that there is no rule of engagement and the golden mean is that there should be no golden mean. It is a free for all affray in which no weapon is too sacred or too profane to be pressed info urgent battle. The end will justify the mean. A legislative mace here, an official canister there to register the official presence of the cooperative and officiating police. If the law cannot be enforced, lawlessness must be enforced, leaving in the trail of anarchy broken limbs, bludgeoned heads and the inevitable overseas treatment.

    It is a mystery as to why this murderous mud wrangling commands the attention of the stellar literati. Perhaps there is a muckraker in all of us. Like Patrick White, his illustrious predecessor, Wole Soyinka, the 1986 Nobel laureate, has also waded into the muddy eddy. It will be recalled that the Nobel laureate authored a play titled The Swamp Dwellers. From the vintage muddy observatory, Soyinka has now noted with characteristic caustic candour that you can take a hippopotamus out of the mud but you cannot take the mud out of the hippopotamus. It was a Soyinkaesque display of wit at its most lapidary and lacerating.

    But if the Nobel laureate thought that he had all the rugby ring to himself, he must be profoundly mistaken. There was a huge mud slide and the swamp dwellers rose in fury as if stung by a swamp scorpion. Even the hippotame—or hippodame—weighed in with characteristic robustness. Not one to take a direct shot lying low, the mother of all mermaids was overheard saying: “Yeye Yoruba man with him wuruwuru wig. If him get oblokos make him come near me with him yeye grammar. I go piss for him mouth.”

    This was just a preliminary skirmish before the main tournament. The prize for perjury goes to internet mudslingers and other habitués of what Soyinka himself may describe as the murky madrassa of cybercreeps. Surveying the muddy melee from a safe distance snooper captured one of the alliterate writhers on Sahara asking Soyinka to go back to school to complete his PhD if he must talk. Now, now, now, asking a Nobel laureate in literature for his PhD is like asking Albert Einstein to go and fix his dodgy mathematics before he could pronounce. This is swamp-speak at its most glorious. It could get nastier.

    All of which must tell us that it is a dangerous river to cross in Rivers State. The crisis in that state and its nuclear fallout are the most potent threat to the democratic process that we have seen so far. If care is not taken the entire process may slide down the muddy swamp. It is very curious that the crisis is unfurling in the presidential backyard, so to speak. Will a man set fire to his own backyard just to secure a political advantage? Jonathan must urgently review his strategy for remaining in office beyond 2015. It does not seem to be working for now.

    To be sure, the ethnicization of presidential struggle is not a novel phenomenon in Nigeria. It is a symptom of a deeper and more fundamental malaise: the zero sum politics and winner takes all mindset of our political elite. It is a reflection of the fact that in Nigeria, power is sought not for national development but for primitive accumulation. This is the classic disease of a retarded political class. But as William Inge noted, a man can build for himself a throne of bayonets, whether he will be able to sit on it is another matter. Social cannibalism always leads to the real thing.

    Although Jonathan is not the original brand owner, it should be noted that it is under his watch that the ethnicization of presidential politics has assumed its most dangerous and nation-threatening form. To be fair, this is partly due to the peculiar circumstances of his political ascendancy. He was the president from nowhere. Even the most riotous and raucous of his Ijaw hegemonists ought to have been taken by surprise at what seemed a divine and miraculous intervention in our body politic. What we have today is a siege mentality among Jonathan’s ethnic promoters. For a hitherto minority group to insist on hanging on to the presidency at all cost without the evidence of sterling performance or even elementary competence is going to be a bridge too far.

    Politics is still a game of numbers. Having secured a pan-Nigerian mandate which was fraught and tense as it was revealing of the polarization of the country along regional, religious and economic lines, Jonathan ought to have commenced a process of national healing that would have led to a solid national consensus. It is only in this atmosphere that national transformation can thrive and blossom. But the past three years have seen Mr President at his most polarizing and divisive best. Even his original enablers have fled, ominously watching from the sidelines which way the mud slide will go.

    In three years, Jonathan has succeeded in alienating critical and crucial stakeholders. The dominant tendencies in the two major hegemonic blocs appear to have distanced themselves from him, leaving him with his core ethnic supporters and the traditional carrion feeders from the east. A situation in which four northern governors would visit the presidential backyard only to be stoned and mobbed bespeaks a gathering political hysteria which does not bode well for democracy. Let us not tempt fate.

    Now let us get this very clear. All this would not have mattered were Jonathan to be in the process of constructing a novel and revolutionary society which involves the smashing of old altars and political shrines. But Jonathan is anything but a revolutionary. He is a traditional politician relying on traditional wheeling and dealing. Yet elementary political common sense ought to have told him that you cannot alienate vital and significant interest groups in a nation and hope to reign or rule in peace.

    Jonathan should take a historic cue. The august rumblings and ominous quietude from Nigeria’s traditional centres of power should tell their own story. This past week, General Abdulsalami Abubakar, the military henchman who birthed the Fourth Republic, rumbled from his Minna summit. The normally sedate and temperate Abubakar does not speak often or out of turn. But he noted tersely that the Royal Rugby in Rivers State is the gravest threat so far to democracy and the survival of the Fourth Republic. He must know what we don’t know. Even in Hippotamia too much frozen mud can lead to hypothermia.

  • Oritsejafor, Utomi advise Nigerians to avoid shortcuts

    Oritsejafor, Utomi advise Nigerians to avoid shortcuts

    Nigerians must avoid what appears to be the easy road to success or prominence because it ultimately undermines both the individual and the nation.

    President of the Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN), Pastor Ayo Oritsejafor and Professor Pat Utomi dwelt on the ills of short-cuts, saying Nigerians are collectively guilty of it.

    Oitsejafor said: “Something went wrong in Nigeria; we somehow got mixed up or messed up as far as values are concerned.”

    Oritsejafor and Utomi spoke at the presentation of the book entitled, “Shunpiking; no shortcuts to God” in Abuja.

    The duo said: “Don’t cut corners, don’t shortcut because you may never get to your destination. Stand out, do the right thing.

    “We have gotten to a point where some people don’t even know the difference between good and bad. There are some people today who will call good bad and bad good. But my joy in all this is that the darker a room is, the brighter a little light will shine. So, today, you don’t need to have so much light to shine; that is what most people don’t know. Don’t join them; become a light where you are,” Oritsejafor said.

    Prof. Utomi who compared shunpiking to the jet age said, “Even in this computer age, computer works on principles, so I see no reason why we as humans should not follow principles.

    According to him, “Shunpiking is when you try to circumnavigate principles. It is not that things can be done in a more speedy way. Shunpiking reduces the time you will travel from one place to the other, when you are shunpiking, you are not necessarily saving time, it is you violating the laid down principles.

    “In Nigeria today, there is a lot of shunpiking, taking shortcuts. People are not prepared for positions of leadership, they force themselves into those positions and mess a lot of people’s live. So, there is a great deal of shunpiking in our environment” he explained.

    Speaking on the importance of the book authored by Reno Omokri, Oritsejafor explained that Nigerians have the potential because they leave this country to other countries and they do the right thing and if they don’t, they end up in Jail but they come back home and start doing the wrong thing.

    He however expressed hope that the book will change people’s mindset. “I believe that with books like this, we will change because it is something that goes out to the world and to Nigerians. As we read this, hopefully, God can put that seed in us so that we will begin to want and desire to do the right thing”.

    Speaking about his plans as the re-elected President for the Christian body, he said, “As the newly re-elected CAN President, you may say we have done it before but we have not fully done it and that is; the unity of the body. Christians must be one, so we are working on it. We must continue to work on it because it is the greatest prayer Jesus prayed, that we may be one.

    We have a project now; we are building the Jubilee centre at the back of the National Christian Centre that will have rooms for people. So many people come here and they are stranded but the centre will help reduce that. Also, it has conference hall and we hope that we can dedicate it this year.

    “I think what my heart is crying out for more is to be able to stand out and challenge those who find themselves in advantaged positions. What are you contributing to the betterment of other people’s lives because one day, your own life will end. Hopefully also, with our prayers, terrorism will move out of Nigeria.

    Also speaking on the recent judgment passed on members of Boko Haram responsible for Suleja bombing, Oritsejafor said, “We are Christians and we are told to forgive but I think what is important is the feeling that there is justice. I think that is what it is now because those we lost in the process left people behind, some are widows while some are orphans.

    “They will sit back and say if nothing else, these are the people who did this, they can stay in a place or in a room for the rest of their lives. That gives a little bit of comfort, it does not solve all the problems but I think the judgement is okay.

    “On the alleged agreement that was reached between Boko and Haram and government, my question is, which Boko Haram? I am asking because there was a time they came out and said they have renounced but we still saw killings going on. Also, a week or two later, Shekau came out to say he does not know anything about those renouncing and that it is President Jonathan that needs amnesty. Again, another group came out of Shekau’s group and they kill foreigners. So right now, there are two deadly groups that we know, so which one of these had an agreement with government?

    “To me, the whole agreement issue is suspect but anyone that comes out to say we are no longer interested, it is a good thing because the number of religious fanatics will reduce by one.

    The Author of the book, Reno Omokri blamed the shortcuts attitude in Nigeria on the poor setup and lack of developed law enforcement system.

    Omokri said, “well, it is just a way that Nigeria is setup and thank God that President Jonathan came with the transformation agenda because if he leaves Nigeria the way it is, nothing will change.

    “It is just like you going to Lagos and Abuja, you see Ambassadors beating traffic light, these are things they will not do in their country because of the way the set up is, so we have to change the set up because Nigerians are not more susceptible to crime than people in America or in Japan but it is because we have not yet developed a highly developed law enforcement system and that is why you see a Nigerian leave Nigeria, goes to US or England and behaves very well.” he explained.

  • Another season of anomie?

    Another season of anomie?

    Why should anyone be annoyed when outsiders say that Nigerians are not capable of sustaining democratic culture?

    At 52 years of age, Nigeria is experiencing another troubling season of anomie. The first season came at the hands of a civilian government; the second and third at the instance of military autocrats, and the current one under the watch of a civilian president whose mission or motto is transformation.

    The title of this essay is a partial borrowing from the title of Wole Soyinka’s book on the politics of evil that led to the Nigerian civil war. Granted that the events described in Soyinka’s book are more gory and scary than what Nigerians are expecting currently, there is no doubt that the state of normlessness that prevailed in Soyinka’s book, A Season of Anomy, is rearing its head again in our own time.

    During Nigeria’s first season of anomie in 1962, some individuals in the federal government and their cronies in the government of Western Nigeria were bent on removing politicians who they thought were not ready to play ball with them by joining the ruling party. In pursuance of this goal, some lawmakers in the Western House of Assembly in Ibadan were induced to play thugs inside the hallowed chamber. They broke the mace, threw chairs at other legislators to draw blood from their heads, etc. Alhaji Tafawa Balewa’s government quickly declared a state of emergency in Western Nigeria. Balewa’s reason was that he needed to prevent Nigeria from sliding into anarchy as a result of mounting political differences between Chief Obafemi Awolowo and Chief Ladoke Akintola. Balewa chose his friend, Dr. Moses Majekodunmi, to function in the place of the premier of the region. What started as a regional or state problem then festered until it became a nation-wide problem, which culminated in a political experiment that later brought Nigeria to decades of military autocracies, and the rest is history.

    The second season of anarchy came in 1966 after the first coup d’etat that removed the elected government of Alhaji Tafawa Balewa. During the first six months, Gen. Johnson Aguiyi-Ironsi introduced the second unitary government in the country, after the one introduced by Lord Frederick Lugard. In July1966, another coup d’etat came to undo the rule of Ironsi, leaving in its wake a major crisis principally in the Northern Region. Igbo men, women, and children were killed in large numbers by angry northerners, to the extent that Lt-Col. Emeka Ojukwu called the killings genocide or pogrom. This led to the civil war, and the rest is history.

    In 1993, General Ibrahim Babangida fomented another crisis that was bound to lead to anomie, by annulling the freest and fairest election in Nigeria. General Sani Abacha came to flush out the interim head of state installed by Babangida to calm the Yoruba or Egba area that made it possible for Abiola to be a Nigerian citizen. The struggle for restoration of Abiola’s mandate by NADECO, NALICON, and other pro-democracy organisations in Nigeria and abroad created a situation of instability in the country. Abacha ruled with brutality and prepared to become a civilian president at the end of his tenure as military dictator. The tension pushed the country close to the edge, and the rest is history, part of which explained how the country came to having elected president, governors, and legislators in the saddle today.

    Nigeria is now at the entrance of another door to anomie. Five lawmakers were reported a few days ago to have imported thugs to the House of Assembly of Rivers State to collaborate with them on a thuggish project: terrorise and replace the duly elected speaker of the State’s House of Assembly. In the process, the five lawmakers (out of a total of 32) sacked the speaker of the assembly and replaced him with one of them. The newly selected speaker had started functioning before the arrival of majority of members of the assembly. A brawl ensued between lawmakers on the side of respect for the constitution and five legislators on the side of abuse of the constitution. The act of terrorism thrived in the state assembly in Port Harcourt, as if law and order had broken down in the city or in the country. There were no security officers to prevent the disorder that brought embarrassment to the state in particular and to the country in general.

    It is not clear at the time of writing this piece what the motives for the action of the five lawmakers who attempted to violate the constitution of the land were. As expected, the Inspector-General of Police had promised to investigate, in order to find out who broke the law and recommend what to do to such persons. It is not clear how long the investigation is to take, but the result of the probe promised by the IGP is worth waiting for, given the enormity of the violation that took place in the Garden City three days ago and given the disruption and instability that similar acts in the past had caused the country.

    Most patriotic citizens would not have expected that the country would come again to its present low in relation to the rule of law. Not after what it took many citizens to bring democracy back to the country. Not after the death of so many people in the process of wresting the country from military dictators and restoring democracy. Not after the gloomy prediction that Nigeria could disintegrate by 2015. Not after the life of the country had been endangered for about two years by Boko Haram. To be repeating what happened in Ibadan 50 years ago is tantamount to remaining on the same spot since 1962 in terms of political morality and progress. With such evidence of stagnation, why should anyone be surprised if foreigners predict doom for our country? Why should anyone be annoyed when outsiders say that Nigerians are not capable of sustaining democratic culture?

    There is a saying among the Yoruba: When one’s neighbour chooses to eat vermin, one must warn him or her about the bad consequences, not only for the sake of the eater of vermin, but also for the peace of the neighbour, as the coughing and sneezing would not allow the neighbour to sleep at night. Some of the lawmakers in the Rivers State House of Assembly are metaphorically eating a vermin and the consequences, if the act is not properly and quickly addressed in a legal and constitutional manner, be too serious for the entire country to deal with.

    Given the current state of Egypt just two years after the coming of civil rule and democracy in that country, Nigerians need to call their rulers to order. In particular, the President and the National Assembly need to act fast and right, to prevent the country from descending into another political abyss. Such intervention should be in addition to the investigation promised by the IGP. Such intervention is needed urgently, in order to prevent the rascality or banditry in the Rivers House of Assembly last Tuesday from ballooning into a national crisis, such as similar misbehaviour in Ibadan in 1962 did.

  • Reps kick against UK’s planned £3,000 visa bond for Nigerians

    Reps kick against UK’s planned £3,000 visa bond for Nigerians

    Minister of Foreign Affairs Olugbenga Ashiru said yesterday that the Federal Government will defend the interest of Nigerians on consular related issues with foreign countries.

    Ashiru spoke in Abuja following a proposal by the United Kingdom to introduce a bond of 3,000 pounds (N750, 000) for intending visitors from Nigeria and five other countries.

    Speaking at the 2013 Ministerial Platform, Ashiru reiterated that the UK government was yet to officially notify Nigeria on the proposal scheduled to start in November.

    “Really, we have received no official communication from the UK government.

    “When we receive communication from them, we will study whatever proposal they are trying to do but I can assure all Nigerians that President Jonathan’s government will defend the interest of Nigerians by whatever means it can.’’

    The House of Representatives Foreign Affairs committee kicked against the policy. Chair of the Diaspora Committee Abike Dabiri –Erewa asked Nigeria to adopt the principle of reciprocity if the UK insists on the visa bond from Nigerians traveling to Britain. She suggested a N5million bond for any Briton seeking Nigerian visa as a visitor.

    Chairman, House of Representatives Committee on Foreign Affairs, Ms. Nnenna Elendu-Ukeje described the visa bond as discriminatory and unacceptable. She said the House of Representatives would take a critical look at the policy as it affects Nigerians and come up with a way forward. Dabiri-Erewa said: “Nigeria should adopt the principle of reciprocity. If they ask us to pay £3,000, let their citizens also pay N5million visa bond.

    “This is a discriminatory policy and it is unacceptable. Do not forget that we are a member of the Commonwealth, what are we going to enjoy if they could impose such a discriminatory policy?

    “I am quite sure that France will not impose visa bond on their former colonies. The UK Government should reverse it or else we should pay them back in equal measure.

    “The Federal Government should not allow the situation to lie low; it should reject it and make it reciprocal.

    “When South Africa said we should be paying N100, 000 visa bond and we reciprocated, it quickly stopped the policy.

    “If Nigerian and Indian doctors withdraw their services in the UK, their health sector will collapse.

    Elendu-Ukeje described the new UK visa bond as discriminatory and unacceptable.

    In a statement in Abuja, the lawmaker said such policy was not in the best interest of Nigeria and Nigerians.

    She said: “This is totally discriminatory and unacceptable. It is target to non-white Commonwealth.

    “They should realise that it is not in the best interest of UK. We will as a country, going to look at it vis-a- vis our citizens and come up with a decision.

    “We agree totally with our Foreign Minister that the policy is totally unworkable and impractical’’.

    “It is contrary to the commitment made to our President by Prime Minister David Cameron during their last meeting. We believe it is for political reason ahead of general elections.

    “We seek that our long historical relationship should take precedence over political expediency.”

    The minister admitted that the biggest challenge facing the present administration’s foreign policy thrust was the welfare of Nigerians abroad.

    He said Nigeria missions abroad had been directed to pay utmost attention to the needs of Nigerians abroad, particularly the plight of Nigerians in various prisons abroad.

    He acknowledged that many Nigerians were stranded abroad in prisons and that the affected Nigerians had continued to suffer various forms of discriminations in their host countries.

    According to the minister, over 9000 Nigerians are currently serving prisons terms abroad, with the largest number of 752 in the UK.

    “Most of the remaining prisoners are concentrated in the Asia – Pacific region and a good number of them are on death row.

    “We are concluding Prisoners’ Transfer Agreement (PTA) with all those countries, such as United Kingdom, Thailand, Japan, China, Indonesia, Switzerland, South Africa, Mozambique, Angola and Hong Kong, so that we can bring home these Nigerians to complete their prison terms.

    “I wish to seize this opportunity to appeal to members of different groups; the media, civil societies, religious groups, traditional rulers, etc, to join hands in the education of our youths in an enlightenment campaign against trafficking in drugs, in particular, and other social vices in general. “This assignment should not be left alone to Governments at different levels to handle.’’

    On the much-talked about reopening of Information Centres abroad, the minister appealed to the Federal Ministry of Information to ensure proper funding for the centres.

    “All I will appeal is that when it starts, they must be well funded; I do not want cases where you send information officers abroad and after nine months or six months the funding will be tied.

    “You must ensure proper funding and we in the ministry of foreign affairs are in favour of this move because three or four heads are better than one’.