Tag: Nuclear Energy

  • Experts explore Africa’s nuclear energy sustainability

    Experts explore Africa’s nuclear energy sustainability

    Experts in the financial  and business investment community are driving dialogue on how to consolidate innovative strategies to ensure Africa’s energy security and sustainable growth.

    The players : are among 5,000 representatives from government, investment communities, and senior energy sector professionals, who met in South Africa at the weekend to examine the role of nuclear energy and its future in  Africa at the African Energy Week  (AEW) 2025.

    The AEW,  is an  annual forum organised by the African Energy Chamber, which convenes Africa’s foremost energy leaders, global investors, and senior executives from both public and private sectors.

    It has served  as a premier platform combining conferences, exhibitions, and networking opportunities with the ambitious goal of eradicating electricity deficits across Africa by 2030.

    According to a statement by the organisers, State Atomic Energy Corporation,  Rosatom   participated  in the  programme.

    Kirill Komarov, First Deputy Director- General for Corporate Development and International Business of Rosatom, in a panel discussion examined: “Nuclear Energy in Africa: Financing, Economics, and Sustainable Deployment.”

    The dialogue addressed the sector’s foremost challenges, including infrastructure development, regulatory environments, and financing mechanisms.

    Read Also: Tinubu arrives Rome for Aqaba Process meeting on West Africa security

    Experts exchanged insights on mobilising investments and securing the sustainable advancement of nuclear projects throughout the continent.

    In his remarks, Kirill Komarov emphasised: “Addressing Africa’s burgeoning energy needs calls for pioneering solutions underpinned by steadfast, long-term collaboration. “Our experience in Egypt serves as compelling evidence that nuclear technology, when coupled with investments in human capital, infrastructure, and transparent engagement, can significantly bolster national energy security and propel sustainable development.

    “Rosatom is honoured to collaborate closely with African partners to cultivate a balanced and sustainable energy framework, share deep expertise, and help build a resilient, low-carbon economy for generations to come.”

    Vladimir Aptekarev, Deputy Director General for Floating Power Energy Solutions, Rosatom, contributed to the Russia–Africa Energy Summit which explored strategic cooperation between Russia and African nations across the oil, gas, and nuclear sectors.

    The statement reads:” The session focused on opportunities for technology transfer, infrastructure development, and deepening economic ties — particularly in the context of Africa’s growing energy demand and the significance of reliable, sustainable solutions such as nuclear power.

    “Rosatom’s presence at AEW 2025 coincides with the momentous celebration of the 80th anniversary of the Russian nuclear industry — a milestone commemorating eight decades of technological excellence and groundbreaking innovation in nuclear energy.

    “This united industry visionaries and pioneers in a shared commitment to strengthening international cooperation and fostering the development of safe, reliable nuclear technologies worldwide.

    “Russia maintains an active and expanding collaboration with all interested nations. Significant international projects are being implemented, with Rosatom and its subsidiaries playing a pivotal and leading role in these global initiatives.”

  • Can nuclear energy unlock a bright future for Nigeria?

    Can nuclear energy unlock a bright future for Nigeria?

    • By Oluwatobi Adeyemi

    Can nuclear power illuminate Nigeria’s path to progress? Africa’s most populous nation is a country pulsating with over 200 million dreams. It is confronted with a formidable trilemma: crippling energy deficits, staggering unemployment and persistent security concerns. 

    This complex web impedes its aspirations for progress, leaving nearly half its population shrouded in darkness and millions yearning for opportunity. While renewable energy sources like solar and wind offer hope, a controversial player emerges as a potential game-changer: nuclear power.

    Nigeria’s growing number of youths brimming with talent and ambition are facing a harsh reality: an unemployment rate of 33%. This lack of opportunity leads to frustration and instability, casting a long shadow over the development of the country. However, nuclear power plants can provide a ray of hope. Their construction, operation, and maintenance require skilled labour, which creates opportunities in engineering, construction, health, and safety. Imagine the transformational impact of thousands of innovations across Nigeria, empowering individuals, families, and entire communities. This ripple effect will create economic momentum, igniting job engines across the country, and lifting millions out of the darkness of unemployment.

    Economic growth depends on reliable and consistent power, which is the life of the business. Unlike weather-dependent renewable energy, nuclear power plants put out electricity 24/7 without sunlight or dramatic wind maintenance. This dynamic attracts jobs, boosts productivity, and fuels innovation. Nuclear energy enables Nigeria to unlock its industrial potential, add value to its many resources, and diversify its economy. The steady electricity supply means buzzing factories, humming machines, and a country throbbing with rhythmic progress. Imagine a future of “Made in Nigeria” and quality and innovation, powered by reliable nuclear power.

    While Nigeria may be a relatively low emitter, it is important in the global fight against climate change. The adoption of renewable energy is commendable, but utilizing the resource at scale remains a challenge. Nuclear power, however, offers a compelling alternative. It produces zero greenhouse gas emissions during operation, making it a clean and sustainable energy source. By embracing nuclear responsibility, Nigeria can contribute to global de-carbonization efforts while ensuring its energy security and paving the way for a cleaner future. Imagine a country bathed in the glow of progress, powered by clean energy, and contributing to a healthy planet.

    The path to nuclear power isn’t all roses without thorns. High upfront costs can be a hurdle, and concerns about safety and waste disposal need to be addressed with robust regulations and transparent communication. Public education and community engagement are crucial to building trust and ensuring the responsible development of this technology. Additionally, the issue of security cannot be ignored. Concerns about potential breaches or radioactive materials falling into the wrong hands must be addressed head-on, with robust security measures and international cooperation essential for mitigating risks.

    Nigeria’s energy future is not a binary choice between renewables and nuclear. It is a complex tapestry requiring a diversified mix of solutions. Embracing nuclear energy responsibly, alongside renewables and energy efficiency measures, can provide the nation with the reliable, clean, and affordable power it craves. To unlock this potential, international cooperation and knowledge sharing are essential. Developed nations with advanced nuclear expertise can partner with Nigeria, providing technical assistance, capacity building, and financial support. Imagine a global collaborative effort, where knowledge and resources flow freely, empowering nations like Nigeria to harness the potential of nuclear power for their advancement.

    In this journey towards harnessing nuclear power, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) plays a crucial role in raising awareness and ensuring responsible development. The IAEA offers invaluable technical expertise, safety standards, and training programs, guiding and equipping nations like Nigeria with the knowledge and resources necessary to address public concerns and build trust. Imagine a future where nuclear technology is shrouded not in fear, but in the IAEA’s guiding light of transparency, safety, and environmental responsibility.

    The allure of nuclear energy is quite attractive and undeniable. Unlike wind and solar, which are susceptible to weather fluctuations, nuclear reactors churn out electricity 24/7, providing a constant lifeline for industries and powering the engines of economic growth. Moreover, in a world increasingly concerned about climate change, nuclear power plants operate emission-free, offering a cleaner alternative to fossil fuels and contributing to global de-carbonization efforts.

    Read Also: Kogi, Chinese govt. discuss partnership in nuclear energy

    For Nigeria, which relies heavily on natural gas for electricity generation, nuclear energy also promises greater energy independence. The nation’s vulnerability to fluctuating gas prices and geopolitical uncertainties could be mitigated by securing a stable domestic source of power. Additionally, the construction, operation, and maintenance of nuclear power plants create thousands of skilled jobs, boosting the economy and fostering technical expertise within the country.

    However, the path to nuclear power is not without its thorns. The initial investment is staggering, potentially straining Nigeria’s already stretched budget. Radioactive waste disposal poses a long-term environmental and safety challenge, demanding robust infrastructure and stringent regulations. Operating and maintaining these complex facilities require a highly trained workforce and adherence to rigorous safety protocols, necessitating significant investments in capacity building and expertise development.

    Public perception also presents a hurdle. Accidents like the meltdown at Chernobyl (Ukraine, 1986) and Fukushima (Japan, 2011; triggered by an earthquake and tsunami) have cast a long shadow over nuclear energy, fuelling anxieties about safety and proliferation. Building public trust demands unwavering transparency and open communication, addressing concerns head-on and fostering a culture of informed decision-making.

    Ignoring these challenges would be akin to sleepwalking into a potential nightmare. Thorough feasibility studies must be conducted to assess the economic, technical, and environmental viability of nuclear power in the Nigerian context. Open dialogue and public engagement are essential to address concerns and build trust in the nuclear program. Collaboration with countries with established nuclear programs can provide invaluable expertise and support in technology transfer, knowledge sharing, and capacity building.

    Ultimately, the decision to embrace nuclear energy is not to be taken lightly. It demands a careful dance between ambition and pragmatism, balancing the potential benefits with the inherent risks. Safety must be the paramount concern, with adherence to the highest international standards being non-negotiable. Only then can Nigeria unlock the potential of nuclear power while mitigating its risks and ensuring the safety and well-being of its citizens.

    Nuclear energy might be the key to illuminating a brighter future for Nigeria, but it’s not a light switch that can be flicked on without careful consideration. Only through responsible implementation, transparent communication, and unwavering commitment to safety can Nigeria turn this gamble into a winning hand, illuminating the path towards a more prosperous and sustainable future.

    In conclusion, nuclear power can be a valuable piece in the puzzle of Nigeria’s development, addressing its trilemma of jobs, growth, and security. However, its integration requires a cautious, collaborative, and security-conscious approach. By addressing concerns, fostering trust, ensuring responsible implementation, and raising public awareness with the IAEA’s support, Nigeria can harness the power of the atom to illuminate a brighter future for its people and the planet. This path, demanding prudence, collaboration, and unwavering commitment to progress, may just light the way for a nation yearning for progress and ready to shine.

    • Adeyemi writes from Department of History & International Studies, Lagos State University (LASU), Òjó, Lagos.
  • Russian firm trains Nigerians on nuclear energy

    As part of plans by the federal government to improve electricity generation through nuclear means, ROSATOM, a Russian government-owned nuclear energy firm, has begun training of Nigerian professionals and youths in that regard.

    The training is meant to boost the capacity of Nigerians, when the federal government builds nuclear energy research centres and plants in the country soon.

    Tagged: ‘Atoms for Africa,’ the training, now in its fifth edition, runs for five weeks, beginning from September 1st  and ends September 30th, 2019, and being co-sponsored by ROSATOM, EnerConnect and South African Young Nuclear Professionals Society.

    With participants drawn from various higher institutions across the country, the training is expected to unleash the best potentials on them.

    Thereafter, winners would emerge and unveiled at the African Nuclear Youth Summits in Johannesburg, South Africa October.

    In a statement signed by the ROSATOM’s Central and Southern Africa Chief Executive Officer, Dmitry Shornikov, he said the training is aimed at improving the capacity of young professionals in the area of nuclear energy globally.

    “One of our key missions at ROSATOM is to assist the brightest young minds from across the globe to work together in solving global challenges that will shape the future of energy and the world as we know it. This is a great opportunity for young people from very different walks of life who share a common passion to build a bright and sustainable future for Africa to discover more about various nuclear,” he said.

  • Nuclear Energy: Fed Govt must rid Nigeria of insurgency

    Nigeria must rid itself of insurgency and other issues that are threatening its peace and tranquility, if it wants to produce nuclear energy for growth, Chief Executive Officer, Century Power Generation Nigeria Limited, Mr Chukwueloka Umeh, has said.

    In a chat with The Nation on phone at the weekend, he said there was nothing wrong with plans by the Federal Government to generate nuclear electricity, adding that countries in Africa and beyond are doing the samething.

    Umeh said: Production of nuclear energy by Nigeria is a good step in the right direction. However, the country must not lose sight of the fact it has to deal with insurgency and other acts of terrorism that are gradually creeping into the country. The reason is because nuclear energy is  produced with high technology; that must be managed well at all times.”

    He continued: ‘’ You would recall that earthquake and tsunami struck in  Eastern Japan on March 11, 2011. This caused  a serious accident at the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant on the northeastern coast of Japan. The earthquake cut off external power to the reactors.Tsunami, which has reached levels more than twice as high as the plant was designed to withstand, disabled backup diesel generators, crippling the reactor cooling systems.

    He added that: ‘’As a result of this, battery power was quickly exhausted, and overheating fuel in the plant’s operating reactor cores led to hydrogen explosions that severely damaged three of the reactor’s buildings. Fuel in three of the reactor cores melted, and radiation released from the damaged reactors contaminated a wide area surrounding the plant and forced the evacuation of nearly half a million residents.

    He said China and other countries have had a fair share of the accident caused by explosion of nuclear technology.

    Nigeria, he said, is battling with Boko Haram and other terrorist activities, adding that any attempt by such groups to tamper with the nuclear technologies can sweep off, for instance,  a place like Lagos.

    Umeh said in countries where nuclear power plants have been built to produce  thousands of electricity megawatts (Mw) needed to bring about socio-economic growth, technologies that can withstand the explosions are provided.

    ‘’That is the more reason the Federal Government must try and put an end to Boko haram among other activities that are related to insurgency, if it wants Nigeria to benefit from the  production of nuclear energy. You can imagine the number of people that would die, the properties that would be lost and other losses in the event that the technologies that produce nuclear energy are tampered with by some disgruntled elements.’’ he said.

  • ‘Why Nigeria needs nuclear energy’

    To tackle its power challenge, the Federal Government is partnering ROSATOM, the Russian government-owned nuclear agency. In this interview with AKINOLA AJIBADE, ROSATOM’s Central and Southern Africa Chief Executive Officer Dmitry Shornikov speaks on the benefits of nuclear energy, among others. They met at the at the X1 Atomic Energy Conference in Sochi, Russia.

    What informed the partnership between ROSATOM and Nigeria on nuclear energy?

    The sector is grappling with problems, such as shortage of gas, irregular power supply, poor distribution network, a development, which has put the industry in a comatose. The country has tried to fix the sector, but to no avail. Even the energy mix introduced by the Federal Government, in conjunction with the Ministry of Power, did not help matter.

    To address the problem, Nigeria is left with the option of partnering  an organisation, which core competence lies in promoting the energy industry. That is where ROSATOM comes in.

    How can Nigeria meet the demand for uninterrupted electricity supply?

    Improvement in the supply of electricity in Nigeria is tied to the efforts being made on the issue. The Federal Government has taken critical steps towards improving electricity supply in the country. It has privatised the power sector, built some power stations and lately trying to go into production of nuclear energy for growth. The government is making steady progress towards adopting and integrating nuclear energy, with a view to improving production and supply of electricity to her more than 170million population. Besides, the government, through its Ministry of Power, the Nuclear Energy Commission and other critical stakeholders, signed an agreement with the Russian government on the use and production of nuclear energy in the country. Represented by ROSATOM, the leading nuclear energy producer globally, the Russian government did not leave anyone in doubts on the need to bail Nigeria out of its energy problems. We, at ROSATOM, believe that Nigeria can come out of its energy crises, if she remains committed to the issue of generating nuclear energy, which many countries have keyed into. Through this means, we believe that the country can scale up generation from its less than 5,000 megawatts (MW) of electricity greatly. Beyond this, the use of nuclear energy would help in improving power supply, activities in the manufacturing and other sectors of the economy and, by extension, the country’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP).

    What is the level of seriousness Nigeria attached to the issue of producing nuclear energy?

    The government is making steady progress on the issue. This is evident by the aggrement which the country signed two years ago in relation to this issue. We believe that the Federal Government’s gesture would culminate in signing more agreements in the immediate future; that is, the agreements would lead to siting of nuclear energy plants and production of electricity in Nigeria, reputed to be biggest economy in Africa.

    Is Nigeria serious about nuclear energy?

    Yes, a whole lot of things must be on ground before any country can actualise or practicalise the use of nuclear energy. First, is a well articulated policy, which spells out the reasons behind the issue of generating nuclear power, the megawatts, which the country intends to generate, the distribution and transmission capacity and others as contained in infrastructural provisions of that country in particular. A well-structured infrastructural guideline, are required to ascertain the level of seriousness, which either a public or private entity is having in the course of producing nuclear energy for growth. For instance, the nation or government, which intends to provide nuclear electricity for its people must have taken a position on the issue, showing a reasonable level of involvement of its key stakeholders in the project; prepare its legislative and regulatory; ditto providing a strong human resources and safety programmes.

    Others include provision of a bigger funding and financing structures, sites for the construction of nuclear plants, among others.

    When will Nigeria and ROSATOM sign the agreement?

    The two parties are holding discussions on the issue of production of nuclear energy for growth. Discussions between Nigerian and the Russian Government on the issue have reached an advanced stage and hopefully would lead to success in the long run. ROSATOM would be more interested in building nuclear energy resource centres, a development, which would further take the cooperation between the two organisations forward soon.

    Other things that would be taken into considerations include building of nuclear power plant(s), among others, and we are hoping that the partnership between Nigeria and ROSATOM on the use of nuclear energy would provide some benefits to the two countries.

    In which other countries do you intend to build nuclear energy centres?

    Rwanda is another country, where ROSATOM is planning to build centres, which would help in the efficient and seamless production of nuclear power for the country. ROSATOM has signed an agreement with Rwandan government to achieve this goal. Besides, there was an inter-governmental agreements signed with Rwandan government last year.  The firm is planning to replicate the facilities in each of the countries that has reached a conclusion on the issue of generating nuclear energy for its people. The firm is proceeding with negotiations in countries that want to produce nuclear electricity in Africa and beyond. Rwanda  is a new comer, as it has not used nuclear energy before and what this means is that a lot of things have to be provided by the country, for the idea to birth into reality. South Africa has embraced the use of nuclear technology and the idea has helped the former apartheid country to improve its electricity generation well. The country has put in place energy mix, with nuclear power providing the much-needed power to grow its economy. It is on record that South Africa produces the highest megawatts (Mw) of electricity in Africa, by providing 40,000Mw, a development made possible by a well-articulated energy mix programme. Egypt is another African country with interest in nuclear energy programme.

    How many megawatts (Mw) of nuclear electricity is Nigeria creating?

    This is basically for Nigeria to decide. The reason is because Nigeria is a client to be for ROSATOM or better put, the Russian government that is generating nuclear energy. Other countries that have signed agreement with ROSATOM for the production of nuclear energy know their energy needs and go out there to meet the needs. They know the electricity megawatts they needed; so also Nigeria. What I can say is that whatever Nigeria wants, we would do our best to give the country what it needs.

    Has Nigeria met all the requirements for producing nuclear energy? 

    Nigeria may not have met all the requirements needed for the production of nuclear source of electricity. But the country seems to be making efforts in that regard. An agreement was signed on the issue two years ago, coupled with the fact that more agreements would be signed by the two institutions in the near future. However, what I can say is that discussions are on-going between the two parties and hopefully, something good would come out if it.

    What is ROSATOM doing to enable people buy nuclear technologies at affordable rates?

    The firm has decided to deal with misconceptions regarding the use of nuclear technologies by some countries. We have heard that the technologies, especially the one that is used in producing electricity, is expensive and not affordable. But the cost is not that high as people are made to believe. This is because the use of the technologies is guided  by some variables. The cost of a technology, which a firm or country is looking for, is influenced by some variables that are attached to it. For instance, nuclear power plants are not constructed the same way; that is their configurations are not uniform. While some have larger configurations, others do not. Obviously, plants with higher configurations tend to attract more costs than the ones with lower configurations. The same thing is applicable to other nuclear technologies. The cost of the technologies is based on the capacity to carry out the functions, which they are designed for. Many of these beliefs are myths, which often times, have been demystified by experts that are working in the nuclear energy industry globally. We have made people to understand at different fora, that building or provision of nuclear energy technologies is not done through a one-off payment.

    What does it take to provide nuclear infrastructure?

    It takes a lot of efforts to provide the infrastructure for producing nuclear energy or any other nuclear products. Normally, a period of  five years is required to build nuclear power infrastructure and another five years to construct power plants. This implies that payment, or better put, funding for the nuclear power projects would be spread across 10 years, a development, which is contrary to the beliefs held in some quarters that payment for nuclear energy plant or production is a one-off thing.

    What other misconceptions surround the production of nuclear energy globally?

    There are many misconceptions surrounding the use of nuclear energy technologies for production and these misconceptions are held by different people. While some believe that technologies are harmful and destructive, others various views.

    Some even said the nuclear energy industry is not well regulated. But I can tell you that it is the most regulated, controlled and safer industry in the world. The reason is that the industry has a system of regulations, which different bodies or arms in the global nuclear energy abide to. There are misconceptions that nuclear energy produces harmful radioactive waves, coupled with the fact that those waves assist in shortening the lifespan of individuals who inhale them. Another one is that nuclear power emits greater and dangerous amount of radiation and that the people living close to the plants are often times prone to lung attack and others. These have been proved wrong by ROSATOM and companies that are working under it through, by educating people on the issue. Many of these things are myths and do not pose some threats to the society, as many people have been made to believe. We have educated people by telling them what nuclear energy can do and what it cannot do.

    What is the lifespan of a nuclear power plant?

    Nuclear energy plant has a longer lifespan, compared to the plants used in generating other forms of energy. Usually, the lifespan of a nuclear energy plant, on the average, is 60 years. The lifespan of the plants can be extended to 80 or 100 years, depending on the level of maintenance of the plants. ROSATOM has constructed several nuclear energy plants and can confidently say that they have longer life span.

    What is the lifespan of other power plants, aside nuclear plants?

    As I said earlier, there are power generation plants that have lower lifespan, and a good example is coal power plant. The lifespan of a coal power plant is usually 20 years, which means that every two years, one must have a cash flow to ensure continuous maintenance of the plant. To ensure that the coal power plant operates seamlessly, it must be maintained continually. When you add the cost of maintaining a coal power plant within a short period of time, it is a lot of money. This aside the fact that the plant generates fewer megawatts compared to a nuclear energy plant that produces thousands of megawatts(Mw) of electricity.

    In what way  can nuclear energy technologies improve the growth of Nigeria’s agricultural sector?

    Nuclear technologies would help to improve agricultural growth in Africa, and countries, such as Nigeria, Zambia, Rwanda, South Africa, Ghana, and Cote d’Voire are going to benefit a lot. The reason being that those countries practise agriculture substantially and would need the technologies to improve the health of their farm produce. Once those countries can identify areas where they need the technologies in their farms and appropriately apply them, the better for the growth of the sector.To tackle  problems, such as pest, that are inbiting the growth of agricultural produce, ROSATOM has introduced radiation centeres in some regions. The centres would help in improving the quality of the stored farm produce.

    What is the purpose of this exhibition?

    The main purpose of this exhibition is to promote the use of nuclear energy and other things that are associated with it. Besides generating electricity for people, nuclear technologies provide other functions in the society. These functions in one way or the other help in improving the quality of life of the people.These functions are brought to the knowledge of the people through education, which is in line with the theme of the exhibition.

    There are several ways in which nuclear technologies help in improving the standards of life of the people, as stated in the theme of this year’s Atomic Exhibition.

    First, the technologies help in providing a clean and affordable source of energy.  Unlike gas and other energy sources, nuclear energy is cheaper, healthier and easier to access by the people. Secondly, nuclear energy does not produce radiations. By this, the users of nuclear energy have been saved from radiation, caused by emission of harmful chemicals like carbon dioxide and others.

    Thirdly, the technologies offer medical solutions to the issues that affect the people. In this case, they help in the treatment and prevention of cancers and other life-threatening diseases in the world.

    Fourthly, they offer great potential for the development of the agricultural sector. The technologies assist in destroying pests that are inhibiting the growth of the agricultural produce, when they are well applied. When this happens, the life span of agricultural products is increased; ditto the individuals who use the products for their development. Fifthly, the technologies help in reducing climatic problems globally. Issues, such as emission of carbon dioxide, oil pollution, and water pollution, are dealt with by the rightful usage of nuclear technologies.

  • Russia, Nigeria collaborate on nuclear energy

    Russian and Nigerian Government are collaborating to provide nuclear energy in Nigeria to help the country reduce power outages, improve industrial capacity and further grow its Gross Domestic Product (GDP), ROSATOM Central and Southern Africa Chief Executive officer, Dimitry Shornikov, has said.

    ROSATOM is a Russian Government-owned nuclear energy firm, and it specialises in the production and generation of nuclear electricity for countries in Europe and others.

    In an interview in Lagos, Shornikov said Nigeria’s power is one of the poorest in Africa, adding that the two power sources, namely gas and hydro are unable to produce electricity megawatts, the country requires for growth.

    According to him, a lot of misconceptions surround the production of nuclear energy, noting that it has been proved over time that nuclear energy is the safest of all energies produced globally.

    Nuclear energy, Shornikov said, is highly regulated and controlled, a development, which left credence to the fact that it is well managed and not prone to dangers contrary to the notions held by many Nigerians.

    He said the two forms of electricity are not affordable, adding that the development informed the decision by ROSATOM to partner with the Federal Government on how it can provide nuclear electricity in the country.

    Shornikov said: “When compared to the production of hydro and gas electricity with that of nuclear energy, they are expensive and unreliable. These problems are not present in nuclear energy.”

    He said it would be difficult to provide the cost of producing nuclear energy in Nigeria because sizes and configurations of the nuclear plants are not the same. This is not like gas turbine that is manufactured to generate a particular number of megawatts (Mw) of electricity.

    “There are lots of variables that need to be considered in the process of configuring nuclear energy plants. The variables are in relation to the size of the plant, the volume of energy the plant would produce,” he added.

    He said though the cost of producing nuclear may be prohibitive, its benefits outweigh the cost because it is environmental friendly, reliable and regular.

    Shornikov said: “The negotiations for the establishment of science and nuclear energy centre between Nigeria and Russia has reached an advance stage. The two parties are working together on how to proceed on the issue of establishing the centre in Nigeria.

    “On safety issues, one of the misconceptions associated with nuclear energy is lack of safety. My aim is to compare it with air travelling. Most people see air travelling as the most dangerous. However, it is the safest in the world. It is the most regulated and controlled sources of energy. There is the need to educate stakeholders on the importance of nuclear energy, brief them that it is the safest.

    “On cooperation with Nigerian Government, it started in 2009 but it is in 2017 that we signed an agreement on it, which set the tone for further discussion on production of nuclear energy and its plants.

    “Electricity stability and regularity is a big issue in Nigeria. There are concerns. There are power outages, which affect the country’s GDP. One source of energy that is available is nuclear energy. It is environmentally friendly compared to gas power.

    “When we talk about cost of generating nuclear energy, obviously it is high because there are variables that need to be considered. These variables lie in the configuration of the plant. On the issue of cost, it depends on the configuration of the size of the plant and the volume of nuclear energy expected to be generated.”

  • Russia, Nigeria collaborate on nuclear energy

    Russian and Nigerian Government are collaborating to provide nuclear energy in Nigeria to help the country reduce power outages, improve industrial capacity and further grow its Gross Domestic Product (GDP), ROSATOM Central and Southern Africa Chief Executive officer, Dimitry Shornikov, has said.

    ROSATOM is a Russian Government-owned nuclear energy firm, and it specialises in the production and generation of nuclear electricity for countries in Europe and others.

    In an interview in Lagos, Shornikov said Nigeria’s power is one of the poorest in Africa, adding that the two power sources, namely gas and hydro are unable to produce electricity megawatts, the country requires for growth.

    According to him, a lot of misconceptions surround the production of nuclear energy, noting that it has been proved over time that nuclear energy is the safest of all energies produced globally.

    Nuclear energy, Shornikov said, is highly regulated and controlled, a development, which left credence to the fact that it is well managed and not prone to dangers contrary to the notions held by many Nigerians.

    He said the two forms of electricity are not affordable, adding that the development informed the decision by ROSATOM to partner with the Federal Government on how it can provide nuclear electricity in the country.

    Shornikov said: “When compared to the production of hydro and gas electricity with that of nuclear energy, they are expensive and unreliable. These problems are not present in nuclear energy.”

    He said it would be difficult to provide the cost of producing nuclear energy in Nigeria because sizes and configurations of the nuclear plants are not the same. This is not like gas turbine that is manufactured to generate a particular number of megawatts (Mw) of electricity.

    “There are lots of variables that need to be considered in the process of configuring nuclear energy plants. The variables are in relation to the size of the plant, the volume of energy the plant would produce,” he added.

    He said though the cost of producing nuclear may be prohibitive, its benefits outweigh the cost because it is environmental friendly, reliable and regular.

    Shornikov said: “The negotiations for the establishment of science and nuclear energy centre between Nigeria and Russia has reached an advance stage. The two parties are working together on how to proceed on the issue of establishing the centre in Nigeria.

    “On safety issues, one of the misconceptions associated with nuclear energy is lack of safety. My aim is to compare it with air travelling. Most people see air travelling as the most dangerous. However, it is the safest in the world. It is the most regulated and controlled sources of energy. There is the need to educate stakeholders on the importance of nuclear energy, brief them that it is the safest.

    “On cooperation with Nigerian Government, it started in 2009 but it is in 2017 that we signed an agreement on it, which set the tone for further discussion on production of nuclear energy and its plants.

    “Electricity stability and regularity is a big issue in Nigeria. There are concerns. There are power outages, which affect the country’s GDP. One source of energy that is available is nuclear energy. It is environmentally friendly compared to gas power.

    “When we talk about cost of generating nuclear energy, obviously it is high because there are variables that need to be considered. These variables lie in the configuration of the plant. On the issue of cost, it depends on the configuration of the size of the plant and the volume of nuclear energy expected to be generated.”

  • Nigeria to speak on nuclear energy at summit

    President Muhammadu Buhari will leave Abuja for Washington D.C, United States (U.S) today to join President Barack Obama and about 60 world leaders and heads of international organisations at the Fourth Nuclear Security Summit.

    The summit, according to a statement by the Special Adviser on Media and Publicity, Femi Adesina, will open tomorrow.

    At plenary sessions of the summit, which is dedicated to reinforcing international commitment to the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons, Adesina said Buhari would insist that while Nigeria continues to sustain that commitment, world powers must respect the right of other countries to the peaceful use of nuclear energy for development.

    ‘’He will reaffirm Nigeria’s stance that international efforts to ensure greater security of nuclear materials should maintain a balance between nuclear non-proliferation obligations and the indisputable right of Nigeria and other countries to harness nuclear energy and technology for socio-economic development’’, the statement said.

    It added: “At a meeting in Abuja earlier this month, President Buhari told the Director-General of the International Atomic Energy Agency, Mr. Yukiya Amano, that the Federal Government will welcome greater support from the agency for Nigeria’s aspiration to begin the generation of electricity with nuclear energy.”

  • Buhari off to US for Nuclear Security Summit

    Buhari off to US for Nuclear Security Summit

    President Muhammadu Buhari will leave Abuja for Washington DC on Wednesday, March 30, 2016 to join President Barack Obama and about 60 other world leaders and heads of international organizations at the 4th Nuclear Security Summit.

    The Summit, according to a statement by the Special Adviser on Media and Publicity, Femi Adesina, will open on Thursday.

    At plenary sessions of the summit which is dedicated to reinforcing internatNuclear ional commitment to the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons, President Buhari will insist that while Nigeria will continue to sustain that commitment, world powers must respect the right of other countries to the peaceful use of nuclear energy for development purposes.

    He will reaffirm Nigeria’s stance that international efforts to ensure greater security of nuclear materials should maintain a balance between nuclear non-proliferation obligations and the indisputable right of Nigeria and other countries to harness nuclear energy and technology for socio-economic development.

    It added: “At a meeting in Abuja earlier this month, President Buhari told the Director-General of the International Atomic Energy Agency, Mr. Yukiya Amano that the Federal Government will welcome greater support from the agency for Nigeria’s aspiration to begin the generation of electricity with nuclear energy.

    “While in Washington DC for the Nuclear Security Summit, the President and his delegation which includes Governor Mohammed Abubakar of Bauchi State, Governor Abdulfatah Ahmed of Kwara State, the Minister of Foreign Affairs, Mr. Geoffrey Onyeama, the National Security Adviser, Maj.-Gen. Babagana Monguno (rtd.) and the Director-General of Nigeria’s Nuclear Regulatory Agency, Prof Lawrence Anikwe Dim, will also hold bilateral meetings with other participating Heads of Government and high-ranking United States Government officials.”

    President Buhari will depart Washington DC for Abuja on Sunday.

  • FG to diversify electricity generation using Nuclear energy

    FG to diversify electricity generation using Nuclear energy

    The Federal Government says it will diversify the nation’s electricity generation using nuclear energy.

    This is contained in a statement issued on Thursday by Mr Timothy Oyedeji, Director Press, Ministry of Power, Works and Housing, and sent to News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) in Abuja.

    According to the statement, the Minister of Power Works and Housing, Mr Babatunde Fashola, challenged experts to domesticate issues on Nuclear Energy in the industry.

    The statement reiterated federal government’s commitment in diversifying its energy mix beyond traditional sources of gas, oil and Hydro to include nuclear and other renewable sources like solar, biomass and wind.

    It stated that the minister said this when he received the Director-General of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Mr Yukiya Amano, in his office.

    It said that Fashola challenged Atomic Energy experts to do more in the area of public enlightenment as many Nigerians had limited knowledge about the use of nuclear technology for power.

    “You must begin to break down the seeming complex issues around nuclear power into simple terms and language that our people can understand.

    “We must try to demystify issues around nuclear power in Nigeria,” the statement quoted Fashola as saying.

    It stated that Nigeria cannot afford to be left behind in the acquisition of appropriate nuclear technologies.

    The statement also said the comprehensive nuclear law was with the parliament and would be enacted soon.

    It assured that government would do all within its power to strengthen the capacity of the regulatory regime.

    According to the statement, all procurement activities for the first nuclear power plant with generation capacity of 1,200MW of power to the National Grid by 2025 would be done as scheduled.

    The statement listed Geregu in Ajaokuta local government area of Kogi, and Itu local government area of Akwa-Ibom as the two sites selected by the Nigeria Atomic Energy Commission (NAEC).

    It added that these projects would be financed through Public-Private Participation (PPP) policy for infrastructural development in the country with target to increase it to 4,800MW by the year 2035.

    It stated that Amano expressed satisfaction with NAEC and its team of experts for the research works and human capacity building efforts in this specialised field.

    It added that Amano urged the NAEC to leave no stone unturned in letting Nigerians know that nuclear energy was for peace purposes.

    The statement also quoted the IAEA director-general as saying that “Nigeria’s nuclear energy was for developmental purposes in areas such as engineering, medicine, environmental protection, security, agriculture and food security.”

    The statement said that Amano informed the minister that the IAEA regarded Nigeria as an important partner.

    It stated that IAEA wanted to transfer nuclear technology that would not be adverse to Nigeria.
    It added that IAEA as a responsible international agency wanted Nigeria to use nuclear power for peace and development.

    It said that Dr Erepamo Osaisai, the Director-General of NAEC, stated that Nigeria had made remarkable progress in development and strengthening of activities in diverse and specialised areas of nuclear energy.

    The statement listed energy planning, peaceful use of nuclear for industrial, education, research works, medicine and power generation as areas Nigeria had made progress in.

    According to the statement, the NAEC DG pledged that the commission will continue to drive efforts in areas of technical know-how, manpower and capacity building for overall development of nuclear technologies in Nigeria.