Tag: Obasanjo

  • Interrogating Obasanjo’s intervention

    Interrogating Obasanjo’s intervention

    It is a sad symptom of insensitivity and callousness that some governors, a day after 73 victims were being buried in a mass grave in Benue State without condolence, were jubilantly endorsing Buhari for second term. The time was most unfortunate” – Former President Obasanjo.

    By now, former President Olusegun Obasanjo missive, couched in press statement and delivered to Muhammadu Buhari’s undeclared second term Presidential bid is widely in the nation’s political discourse. Drawing attention in the portion of the letter to some governor’s insensitivity in endorsing President Buhari for a second bid to the presidency in the immediate aftermath of the mass burial in Benue State, former President Obasanjo drew attention to his own crass and reckless opportunism and callous, cold insensitivity too. The same Benue State he exploits their recent and unfortunate tragedy to showcase his humanism and concern, was the same place he ordered soldiers to sack and completely burn down whole community in Zaki Biam, killing more than 100 civilians on October 22, 2001. The killing spree lasted for up to three days and extended to villages of Vasal, Anyim, Lorja, Ugba, Sankera all located in the local government areas of Logo and Zaki Biam.

    The trigger of the Zaki Biam/Logo massacres was Obasanjo’s statement at the state burial of 19 soldiers abducted and killed by Tiv militants, giving soldiers blank cheque to track and bring to books those responsible. While those responsible would have obviously melted away, helpless villagers were brutally and summarily murdered in cold blood, and their properties and buildings decimated. No responsible government would seek revenge in this form and it is doubtful up to this day, whether any real perpetrator of the crime of abducting and killing soldiers was ever found.

    Four months later, on January 28, 2002, the same Obasanjo demonstrated the most egregious insensitivity and extreme banality when he remorselessly shouted down at the relatives of the victims of Ikeja military cantonment bomb blast to shut up and emotionlessly berated them that he needed not be at scene, where estimated 1,100 people perished, with more than 20,000 injured and several others unaccounted for. The cause of the tragedy was not a natural disaster but the accidental high-calibre explosive at a storage facility in the Ikeja Canton Barracks in the early morning of Sunday, January 27, 2002. While President Obasanjo, then huffed and puffed from the high office Nigerians entrusted him at a time when empathy would sooth the frayed national nerves, it was actually the commander of Ikeja military Cantonment, George Emdim that said “on behalf of the military we are sorry. This is an old ammunition depot with a high-calibre bomb. Some efforts were being made in the past to try to improve the storage facility, but this accident happened before the high authorities could do what was needed.”

    The “high authorities,” that could have done the needful to forestall the accident was no other, than the one, former President Obasanjo sat at its pinnacle.

    At the peak of the scheme to trample on the constitution and award himself an illegal third term in office, in lieu of life presidency he craved, former President Obasanjo signed infamous Green Tree Agreement that ceded Nigeria’s hugely endowed territory, the Bakassi Peninsula to another country in a peace time, with the sole aim to impress key western powers that he was politically compliant to enforce their vision of international order. Nigerians in their several hundreds of thousands, who were forcibly evacuated from their ancestral homes in the peninsula have been living in squalid, cold refugee camp, since then and the great humanist who owns a frontline university, a multi-billion naira private presidential library, an indefatigable campaigner who exacts himself strenuously on the national and international stage, could not offer a word to his victims huddled in an inhumane camp for more than 10 years.

    While most Nigerians agree that former President Obasanjo is a malignant and untrustworthy messenger, many of the messages he delivers align with widespread national concerns. However, his opportunism in tapping on the national mood appears to me, to be a way of assuaging a heavily burdened conscience, besmirched by his cruel engagements with every tragic turn of our national life. Seeking a moral high ground without examining very closely the moral infrastructure of his private and public life appears to be his personal indictment and vendetta to our collective amnesia.

    President Buhari and his All Progressive Congress have not delivered up to the expectations that they inspired. But actually, they would not have delivered anything tangible in terms of radical material improvement in the quality of life of the Nigerian people, given the existential reality of our national condition derived largely from a false start and the historical trajectories of several missed opportunities.

    But the charge of nepotism and clannishness is real and very evident and cannot be excused on any account, not least on competence and efficiency which has been grossly in short supply.

    President Buhari should take measures to relieve widely national consensus that he has become a hostage of a tiny cabal within his administration that want to construct puritanically ethnic and kinship-based regime. Such effort is not only futile in a pluralistic society but is bound to incur some unpleasant consequences for its authors, notwithstanding their current position of power.

    The current policy focus of building the requisite and strategic infrastructure for economic recovery and sustainable growth is in the right direction.  According to Nigerian constitution, President Buhari should exercise his right of refusal or throw his hat in the ring for a second term presidential bid and that should not be a matter of insidious plot and counter plot.

    For me, President Buhari’s biggest failing for which he has ample time to make amend, is to make public service and office-holding unattractive especially to traditional politicians for most whom, politics is a mere seed-sowing exercise that must result in the bountiful harvests of personal wealth and opulence.

    Notwithstanding, Obasanjo’s bad-belle missive, President Buhari, and his administration has many gaps to fill and even the upcoming season of electioneering cannot distract from a focused strategy of developing critical policy instruments for national economic recovery and sustainable, inclusive growth.

     

    • Onunaiju, is of Centre for China Studies, (CCS) Utako, Abuja.

     

  • Why I didn’t ignore Buhari in Addis Ababa – Obasanjo

    Why I didn’t ignore Buhari in Addis Ababa – Obasanjo

    Former President Olusegun Obasanjo on Thursday revealed why he greeted President Muhammadu Buhari and took group photograph with him during the African Union (AU) summit in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

    Obasanjo said he had gone round to greet other African leaders present at the summit and wondered if it could have been easy or polite to ignore Buhari without going to his seat to greet him.

    The ex- President spoke in Abeokuta, Ogun State, while fielding questions from journalists shortly after registering his membership of the Coalition for Nigeria Movement (CNM) at the Secretariat of the Ogun State Council of the Nigeria Union of Journalists (NUJ)

    Obasanjo said he knew that Nigerians were surprised that he could exchange pleasantries with President Buhari after his lengthy statement chronicling the ills of the administration.

    “I wonder why some Nigerians were worried why I had to pay respect to the Nigerian President. That’s my own upbringing as a well -born and bred Yoruba boy.

    “That doesn’t mean that what I have said about the President, which I did not say out of bitterness and hatred has been thrown away. It is clear that the President has performed, in some areas, good enough, in other areas not good and a proper advice which he may take and may not take.

    “I didn’t do that out of malice or bad belle. I did it out of my respect for that office and my interest and I hope in your interest and the interest of Buhari in Nigeria.

    “I went to him just before the beginning of the AU summit. I had gone round some few other Presidents and should I ignore him? So, I went to my President, greeted him and we joked before Gen. Salami said we should have a group photograph,” Obasanjo said.

    He, however, assured that the CNM is not like every other movement in town, saying the one being championed today (Thursday) is a big masquerade and urged Nigerians to join.

    He added:  “There are other movements but we, as far as I know, have no direct or indirect relationship with any other movements.  We do not.

    “But as I said, if there are people of like minds, people who shared the view and the aims and objectives of Coalition for Nigeria Movement who want their members to join this movement, we will not object.  We will welcome them.

    “But to the best of my knowledge, this is a movement that has no relationship with any other movement that I know of.

    “This is the new message in town, the new dance in town, the ceremony in town and I will appeal to you to join this ceremony and dance in town because there may be many masquerades.

    “And those of you who had my own type of background, when we were growing up, we were playing masquerades too. But those were small masquerades, but when big masquerades come out, the small masquerade must come out. I appeal to you to join the ceremony, the dance and the message.”

     

  • I’ll withdraw if Coalition Movement morphs into political party – Obasanjo

    I’ll withdraw if Coalition Movement morphs into political party – Obasanjo

    Former President Olusegun Obasanjo on Thursday formally launched the Coalition for Nigeria Movement (CNM) in Abeokuta, the Ogun State, and declared that he would cease to be a member if the movement morphs into a political party or dabble into partisan politics.

    Obasanjo who stormed the Secretariat of the Ogun State Council of the Nigeria Union of Journalists (NUJ) in Oke – Ilewo, Abeokuta, at 12:42 p.m. and registered his membership 10 minutes later,  said CNM is not a “third force” but a popular movement of Nigerians  to propel the country forward irrespective of their political affiliations.

    He was accompanied by armed security operatives and politicians that former Governor of Osun State, Prince Olagunsoye Oyinlola, his Cross River counterpart, Donald Duke, former Minister of State for Defence, Mrs. Dupe Adelaja, opinion leaders and hundreds of enthusiastic residents  desirous of registering their membership of the movement.

    Oyinlola is the National Coordinator of CNM.

    Obasanjo lamented that the leadership of the country has taken nation – building for granted, with citizens being robbed of the sense of belonging.

    He noted that the present composition of the nation’s security apparatus negated the federal character principle enshrined in the constitution.

    He said his letter to President Muhammadu Buhari where he chronicled several problems with the system and suggested solutions was not frivolous but written because of his deep concern for the country.

    The ex-President said: “Nigeria must rethink and retool if the instruments being used in nation – building and governance since independence have not served the country and citizens right.”

    He said CNM is the new direction to mobilise Nigerians for true development, unity, cooperation, security, rule of law, stability, welfare and wellbeing.

    He also declared if Nigeria must change for better, the real change should be brought about by the youth and women, who were often the direct victims of bad system.

     

     

  • Knocks for Obasanjo’s Coalition for Nigeria

    Knocks for Obasanjo’s Coalition for Nigeria

    Political stakeholders are reacting to the debut of the Coalition for Nigeria (CN) in Abuja. Not a few describe the take-off as unimpressive. GBADE OGUNWALE, LEKE SALAUDEEN, JOSEPH JIBUEZE, RAYMOND MORDI report.

    The Coalition for Nigeria (CN), a political movement proposed by former President Olusegun Obasanjo in his controversial “Special Press Statement” nine days ago, has been unveiled.

    It was launched in Abuja yesterday by the former president’s allies, including one-time Osun State Governor Olagunsoye Oyinlola and former Cross River State Governor Donald Duke.

    In the statement, which many described as  a “letter bomb”, Obasanjo made scathing remarks about the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) and the main opposition Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), concluding that neither the APC nor the PDP has what it takes to take Nigeria to the Promised Land.

    It has drawn criticisms. Those who feel that President Muhammadu Buhari has not delivered on his campaign promises lauded Obasanjo for speaking out. Others, who believe the administration is on track, chided Obasanjo for subjectivity.

    The launch is drawing flaks from stakeholders.

     

    Junai Muhammed: It’s a disappointing start

     

    Second Republic lawmaker Dr Junaid Muhammed expressed disappointment over the calibre of people that graced the launch of the CN.

    According to him, there was so much excitement when Chief Obasanjo announced the formation of a new national movement.

    The Kano-born politician observed that there was little preparation before the launch, which he said required Obasanjo’s physical presence.

    He said: “They could have deferred it till when he would be around; it would have been better if he was present because Obasanjo’s presence would have attracted many eminent people to be there. They have started  on a wrong footing but I am sure they will recover their steps.

    “The impression I had was that the third force was created by Obasanjo, which excited many people. I thought it was going to solve the problem of legitimacy in power by providing opportunities for the people in electing their leaders.”

    Muhammed urged Obasanjo not to repeat the mistake he made with the PDP “when he put the party in his pocket, and dictating the tunes. He cannot remain in Ota or Abeokuta and be dictating to the new party.”

    Justifying the need for more parties in the country, Muhammed said there is room for one or two more political parties in the country and cautioned against ethnic-based parties.

    “I am convinced we should have more parties”, he stressed.

    According to him, the APC and the PDP are disasters. “There is no difference between them; they are two sides of a coin”, he said.

     

    Can Nigerians trust them?

     

    Afenifere scribe, Chief Seinde Arogbofa, raised many posers on the legitimacy and capacity of the new movement:

    “Who are they? Can Nigerians trust them? Can they deliver? Can they change things over night? Are they better than APC?

    Arogbofa noted that money plays a major factor in politics, saying: “Money factor can change things over night in Nigerian politics. People sell their votes at the last minute to the highest bidder.

    “The government of the day controls the national purse. They will have enough to take from the national coffer. Unless the new movement can match the ruling party in terms of funding the campaign, it seems dicey.

    “Unless the INEC gets a bill through the National Assembly on making sure the electoral process is rig-proof, our votes will not count. It will be good for us if we are more electronic in our electoral process.

     

    They’re exercising right of association

     

    Senior advocate Malam Yusuf Ali said the people have the right to come together to form association or political group.

    “So, members of the CN are exercising their right as enshrined in the constitution”, he said.

    Ali said the movement will remain an association of friends since it has not been registered as a political party by INEC.

    He said: “We don’t know what they stand for; they have not come out with a manifesto; it is difficult to make comment. It is a collection of individuals. It is when they make their programme known that we can assess them.”

     

    Not ruling party’s match

     

    Chairman of the Afenifere Renewal Group (ARG), Olawale Oshun,  agreed with Ali’s submission that Nigerians have the right to form association in a democratic setting.

    If they have the capacity to transform into a political party, nobody can deny them the right to form a party, he stated.

    Oshun, however, dismissed the third force as alternative to the APC as according to him, the movement has no backbone yet. He said Nigerians know who to follow and who to trust when it comes to decision making.

    He said: “How much support can they get before 2019? It takes time to form parties and be accepted by the people.

    “It is amazing when politicians change parties like underwear. If your party is not performing well to your expectation, you should find out and join hands in finding solutions. Changing parties is not solution.”

     

    Nigerians should look beyond CN

     

    The National Chairman of the United Progressives Party (UPP), Chief Chekwas Okorie, said that those coming together to keep the autocratic political parties on their toes should be welcomed.

    Okorie said: “But whether members of the new group are new faces that would give Nigerians some renewed hope is another matter.

    “If this is the coalition that former President Obasanjo talked about, then he has just increased the number of reactionary political associations from two to three; a third force is yet to come.

    “I say this because, except for one or two of the personalities who are not politically inconsequential, the rest are disgruntled PDP members who are basically Obasanjo’s allies.  I don’t know where their political base is. If their political base is in any part of the country, it is yet to be established.

    “Most of the faces in the group are not rooted in those places where they come from. There is no political party in Nigeria today or anywhere in the world that can operate without a base.

    “You must have a strong home base before you can succeed in politics. The defunct ACN had a base; the defunct CPC had one and the defunct ANPP had one too. Even those who joined the APC from the PDP and APGA had their own bases.”

    The UPP chieftain urged Nigerians to look beyond the new group for a third force.

    He added: “If they intend to register as a new political party, I can tell them as an experienced political party administrator that it would take more than a year or two to sell whatever name they want to call themselves to the Nigerian public.

    So, the time is too short for a new political party to be registered and for it to register in the minds of Nigerians before the election.

    “If they adopt any of the existing parties or encourage a coalition of two or three of the existing parties whose manifestoes and basic principles point to the very things that Nigerians want, such as restructuring, self-determination, devolution of powers, resource control and so on and so forth, and they already have a social contract with the Nigerian people, then the new group can fuse into such parties and make impact.

    “But, if it is for them to make a public show in Abuja and say they are registering a new party, I can tell them from my own experience that they have failed on arrival, because they don’t constitute a third force; at least the type Nigerians are looking for.”

     

    Old faces under new name

     

    Second Republic politician, Tanko Yakassai, said most of the names in the new group were in one party or the other before now, but didn’t make any impact. Therefore, he said there was no reason Nigerians should expect them to make any impact.

    Besides, Yakassai said: “The time is too short for a new party to emerge and make the desired impact. If any group wants to form a political party, this should not be done six or seven months to pre-election stage, because this country is very large: 774 local governments and thousands of wards, each with a number of villages under it.

    “If you are going to form a new political party, you need at least a membership base that is more than two times the number of wards in the country.

    “The only way this can work is, if the new group should merge with a major opposition party like the PDP. If this happens, it would stand a chance of dislodging the ruling party.

    “Even if the APC and the PDP lose some of their big names to this new group, the development may not make much impact, because these big name politicians are actually paper weights in their domains, more so, if the APC and the PDP retains their supporters, then I don’t see any new force surpassing any of them.

    “A good number of them could not deliver their domains for their parties during the last general elections.”

     

    PDP ready for partnership

     

    The launch of the Coalition for Nigeria (CN) movement in Abuja yesterday notwithstanding, the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) has said it remains the only formidable opposition platform that cannot be pushed off the political radar.

    It, however, indicated readiness to engage the CN and team up with other opposition parties with a view to forming a common front against the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) in the 2019 general elections.

    In a telephone interview, PDP’s National Publicity Secretary, Mr. Kola Ologbondiyan, described the PDP as the only viable platform for positive alliance with the CN and other opposition parties in the land.

    According to him, no political party or coalition can be strong enough to push the PDP off the political radar in the years to come.

    Ologbondiyan said: “Our position is that whatever coalition that is coming on the political turf and whose interest is for the greater wellbeing of Nigerians should find it convenience to align and work with the PDP for the greater good of Nigeria.

    “The PDP, in a matter of weeks, will engage other parties in opposition, various communities, associations and other stakeholders in the Nigerian project, including the coalition for Nigeria.

    “Any coalition that is for the greater interest of Nigeria should be prepared to work with a party that had governed the country for 16 years and has structures in 9000 wards cut across the federation. That party is PDP.”

     

    Agbakoba’s NIM’ll join forces with CN

     

    The CN got an ally in the Olisa Agbakoba-led National Intervention Movement (NIM), which said it will join forces with the new movement.

    The NIM was initiated last November 29 by a group of 90 as a non-political organisation to “uplift Nigerians”.

    Asked last night if NIM intends to align with CN which was launched in Abuja yesterday, Agbakoba, a Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN) and former President of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA), said “Yes”.

    He confirmed that the NIM would partner or merge with CN.

    Agbakoba had earlier told newsmen during a briefing on NIM that members were “committed to making a difference in our country”.

    The movement, he said, intended to grow by inspiring and supporting people to start small groups across the country.

    He said the NIM will accommodate anyone concerned about the failures of both the All Progressives Congress (APC) and the Peoples’ Democratic Party (PDP).

    “We want a functioning democracy where political office holders are accountable to the people, public institutions are strong and there is the rule of law,” he said.

    According to him, the APC and PDP lack ideologies, which he said was why Nigerians “are in a sorry situation.”

    “We live in a failed state, and unless we articulate the elements of this failure, we’ll continue to fail,” he said.

  • Obasanjo on his latest move

    Obasanjo on his latest move

    SINCE former President Olusegun Obasanjo issued his “special statement” in which he spanked the Muhammadu Buhari administration, nothing has been heard from him.

    He showed up the other day in Addis Ababa at the African Union Summit. A video of his encounter with President Buhari has been rocking the Internet. Obasanjo is seen in the footage with Buhari and former Head of State Abdulsalami Abubakar. They throw banters and laugh heartily.

    To many, it was incredible that Obasanjo could be that warm to Buhari after firing off that excoriating statement, which sent panic into the Buhari political camp and ignited a renewed excitement on the political landscape.

    Is it true that the Generals who have held the power levers since 1966 may have sworn to a secret oath to remain one even when they seem to disagree in public, to go only so far and no farther? Do they speak a special language the rest of the country cannot understand? What is Obasanjo thinking now? Is he just trying to rock the boat and put Buhari under pressure?  What does he want to do with his Coalition for Nigeria (CN)? Who is beating the drum to which the wily old fox is dancing?

    These are some of the questions Nigerians have been asking since that video surfaced and newspapers splashed the pictures of the Addis Ababa show on their front pages. Nobody can claim for sure that he knows where Obasanjo is heading.

    Considering the avalanche of questions, permutations and postulations, “Editorial Notebook” has taken up the task of finding out what is on the former president’s mind, through a hypothethical encounter with reporters at the Lagos airport upon his return from Addis Ababa. Here we go:

    Reporters are rushing after Obasanjo as he walks briskly to the lounge. He stops suddenly, looks at the small crowd, frowns a bit and beckons to the reporter  ahead of the pack. He moves close. Obasanjo grabs him by the shoulder and pulls his head under his armpit. He knocks his head twice, releases him and says softly:

    Oya, two questions. I won’t take more than that today; otherwise, you get more knocks.”

    “Since your special statement was released, some people have been making comments. Now, they say you were posing for photographs with Buhari and cracking jokes with him. Are you sincere?”

    Huuum! Huuuum!Huuum!Obasanjo clears his throat and smiles like a baby.

    “You see, I mean no harm. Don’t forget, it was advisory. I only advised Buhari to let go and join us to rebuild Nigeria. My brother Buhari knows it is not personal – and that is the hallmark of a statesman; the ability to speak out when others are merely grumbling. You know I fear nobody. I speak my mind.”

    “They say you’re selfish and opportunistic, hitting the government because you think it is vulnerable.”

    “If that is your opinion, keep it; I don’t care. What kind of reasoning is that? Do I want Buhari’s job? How many presidents do you want to make of me? You people should grow up o. I have said my own. Chikena. He who has ears, let him listen. Before it is too late.

    “The other time, they said I wrote a letter to that boy…eeem, eeeem… Jonathan  or wetin call. Yes, I did. This is not a letter; it is a special statement, which is as clear as day in its meaning and objectives. Please.”

    “They say you danced with the late Okadigbo’s wife and ate pounded yam in his house. The next day, the man was fighting a losing battle for his political life. They speak about a tinge of savagery or do-or-die in your politics.”

    “Please, you should know how to talk. What did I do wrong there? I am a statesman; I’m not a politician. My politics is Nigeria and anybody who says Nigeria will not move, I’m ready to go konkobilo with him, no matter how highly placed. Is playing my role as a statesman politics? If you can’t differentiate between politics and statesmanship, then you are a fool. Politics my foot!”

    “The critics say you sold the late Umaru Yar’Adua to Nigerians and later condemned him, asking him to step down. In short, they say you have a megalomaniac tendency and a false messianic orientation which is fast leading to  a Samsonian affliction.”

    Obasanjo raises his left hand, brings it down slowly as the reporter’s  comments continue. He raises his hand again and frowns his face,

    “Wait. Wait.Oga reporter or whatever they call you. Let me talk. You see, it is true that I spoke about Umoru. I stand by what I said. If you take up a job – appointed, selected, elected or whatever. And you discover that your health can no longer carry on, you should know what to do. If you don’t, then you don’t know anything. I said so. Is that too much? Samson ko, Delilah ni.

    “They say you condemned Atiku Abubakar, who played a major role in your administration and that you think you are the only good man in town, Mr Clean.”

    “They say so? Hmmm. You see, it’s true they told me that he was preparing, that he wanted to be president. I recall saying nothing. I only replied, ‘Atiku? I dey laugh o.’ How has that become anybody’s problem? If that one dey pain you, that na your toro. As for me o, I dey kampe.

    “I remember that when we were leaving office, I was singing and dancing when you people came to me. I said, Aremu a maa lo s’Ota, awon kan a maa lo s’ewon (Aremu will be going to Ota, some people will be going to jail).(He begins to dance in short,slow steps, murmuring a song and smiling).One of the reporters cuts in, ‘that was a python dance, Your Excellency’. Obasanjo frowns and hisses.”

    “The June 12,1993 election was adjudged to be Nigeria’s fairest and freest ever, but the winner, your kinsman MKO Abiola, was denied the prize  and you rubbed it in by saying he wasn’t the messiah Nigeria needed and…”

    “Stop it! Please, please, please. Don’t annoy me. If you don’t know how to ask a question, you keep quiet. If I said Abiola wasn’t the messiah, don’t I have a right to my opinion? If he was my kinsman nko? I don’t operate that way. I’m a detribalised Nigerian. How many of you can tell me that your best friend is not from your tribe? You people are the one killing this country.”

    “In your statement, you said Buhari hasn’t done well in the economy, but the government says you may have been travelling too much to notice its scorecard in this and other areas.

    “Foreign reserve is climbing up, rice importation is down, manufacturers have access to funds, the stock market is among the world’s best in performance and foreign investors are coming back.”

    “Look young man. It is true that I said the economy does not obey military order. Besides, if I travel, is it anybody’s business? I have said it again and again; I’m a citizen of the world. I’m a statesman. I have so much to do overseas.I must travel, but wherever I go, Nigeria remains on top of my mind.”

    “It is being said that the coalition you are pushing is a conclave of PDP renegades and looters as well as their disgruntled cousins in APC who would want the days of old back.”

    “Well, I don’t care. Anybody who is not happy should form his own coalition and when coalition jams coalition, there will be collusion and we will step in to curb the commotion. No be so?”

    “Some people are saying you issued that statement because you are still breathing fire over your inability to get a third term.”

    “Those saying that are foolish. Don’t annoy me, please. I have said it before and open your ears now (Obasanjo holds his right ear firmly).I never wanted a third term. If I had wanted a third term, I would have asked God and he would have given it to me. He has never refused me anything. Is that clear?”

    “Some of your critics say your own home has always be in turmoil and that yours is a pretence to moral rectitude.”

    “Moral rectitude, attitude or altitude or magnitude or whatever you call it, I know where you’re going. Dem send you? Go and tell whoever is sending you that I, Olusegun Aremu Okikiolakan Matthew Obasanjo, I cannot be embarrassed. Nobody can embarrass me. Nobody, I repeat. Let them come out; I’m not afraid to fight.”

    “Thank you so much Dr Obasanjo.”

    “Excuse me; point of correction. I remain Olusegun Obasanjo; chief –if you like. And have a good day.”

    He hops into his car, smiling as the vehicle zooms off.

  • Ex-Senate President Ebute flays Obasanjo

    Ex-Senate President Ebute flays Obasanjo

    Former Senate President Ameh Ebute has faulted former President Olusegun Obasanjo for releasing a public statement on President Muhammadu Buhari’s administration.

    The former Senate President, in a letter addressed to Chief Obasanjo titled “Re: The Way Out: A Clarion Call For Coaliation For Nigeria Movement”, said Obasanjo should have sought audience with Buhari to make his points.

    The former Senator, who briefed reporters in Abuja yesterday, said he had cautioned Obasanjo when he wrote former President Goodluck Jonathan.

    Ebute said: “In the current instance too, you have reeled out a torrent of subsisting problems and perceived deficiencies of the Buhari Presidency very hypocritically and in utmost contempt for the office and personality of President Buhari. It is all in veiled pursuit of your secret agenda for the absolute ruination and destruction of Nigeria, a foundation faultily laid by you between 1999 and 2007, when you served as President of the country.

    “The issues of poverty, insecurity, poor economic management as trumpeted in your letter have existed with Nigeria and aggravated under your reign as President. Precisely, poverty, hunger and disease are cardinal components of the Millennium Development Goals, (MDGs), which you claim to be spearheading efforts in the guise of “Zero Hunger” initiative; but gave no attention to it when you wielded power at Aso Rock. This is the pretence and deception that have become your trademark and uprooted or alienated you from  Nigerians.

    He urged Obasanjo to be retrospective in his view, adding that no other person would have done better considering the state Buhari inherited the nation.

    “No former President of Nigeria who knows the poor state of the economy President Buhari inherited in May 2015, would not appreciate the efforts and measures adopted in revamping the economy,” he said.

  • Obasanjo and the third way

    Understandably, most reactions tend to analyse the messenger – Olusegun Obasanjo (OBJ) at the expense of the content of his  Tuesday January 23, essay  entitled “The Way Out: A Clarion Call for Coalition for Nigeria”. Having been on Nigeria’s driving seat for decades with all of us as his passengers, we are all understandably somewhat afflicted with some OBJ messenger-message syndrome!

    As illuminating as most comments are, the two eyes must be on the ball, not on OBJ’s legs as a player. I’m excited that there is a renewed national and even global concern about Nigeria. This is a welcome worthy departure from the saturated run-on-the mill parochial shouting match stuff in both the main and social media. Therefore, for better, for worse, the third way is an idea that is already here with us!

    OBJ has commendably raised the noise level on the need to reinvent Nigerian nation. This is one of the main objectives of National Intervention Movement (NIM).

    I have been overwhelmed with calls by many compatriots since NIM was announced few months ago with demands for new national perspectives and new national actors. The calls are even more strident in the last few days. The legendary great African author/story teller, Chinua Achebe, reminded us that There was Once a Country! Indeed there were once compatriots regardless of diversities who fought gallantly against British colonial imperialism compelling a significant independence in 1960. Nigerians fought against military dictatorships of varying hues with enormous sacrifices in the 80s and 90s. Since 1999, in quantitative terms, Nigeria is truly an election destination with a remarkable electoral retrenchment of incumbent President Jonathan Goodluck two years ago! Almost 20 years after the return to civil rule, this democracy needs quality control. We need new political parties and movements with visions and pan-Nigerian development agenda. We must return to ambitious corruption free nation-building project like other countries. In the last few days, Nigerians are commendably out of the self-imposed cyclones from binary divisive ”we” versus “them” unhelpful narratives caused by governance crisis.

    It’s refreshing we are agonizing and organizing on Nigeria and examining its positions in the contemporary world. That is what the third way is all about; neither “North” or “South”, “West” or “East” but a functioning, fairer, just and productive Federal Republic of Nigeria and invariably working Africa. There is no “Christian” or “Muslim” uninterrupted electricity supply. With the lowest energy per capital in the world (5,000 megawatt for 180 million people), this is the only dark country of believers. We are all regrettably united by energy poverty! It’s time we all rose in bipartisan political way to match and demand for power abundance.

    I envisage soonest a national mass rally against uninterrupted power supply and for energy abundance. That is third way; neither the old two discredited ways; bedroom lamentations and corrupt official excuses! There can’t be industrialization without electrification!  Nigeria must just add value to its abundant raw materials, build industries like China or perish like South Sudan! And there can be no sustainable jobs without sustainable industrialization made only possible by electricity supply. We should soon match on the streets for immediate beneficiation to all raw materials against dumping, smuggled and imported goods. There is no “Muslim” poverty or “Christian” unemployed poor. On the contrary, the few billionaires, (most of them corrupt without visible value adding enterprises!) lack religious labels.

    National Bureau of Statistics, (NBS) reports millions lacking jobs. Most unemployed have certifications; diplomas, multiple degrees but lack the real “degrees” to terminate income poverty: JOBS and JOBS! The new slave returnees from Libya (scandalously after 300 years of abolition of slavery!) hold Nigerian passports. We must reinvent functioning Nigerian labour market to absorb this abundant human energy for development, and development.

    We often discuss resource control in relations to non-renewable resources like crude oil, solid minerals when enlightened nations know that the major resource is human resource. We should deepen the existing Contributory Pension reform and motivate trained workforce with good pay for national productivity. Lest we also forget; there are no good “PDP” or “APC roads.” Ask the FRSC; all Nigerians, child and mothers are potential instant death statistics on national death traps called roads. Unacceptably, the governors, senators, president and vice president elected to fix the roads fly in chattered flights! Some charitable commentators including the Minister of Information, Lai Muhammed have acknowledged the patriotism of OBJ with his latest intervention. But again lest we forget – the national anthem we recite by route every day opens with six opening inspiring words: “Arise, O compatriots, Nigeria’s call obey”. With 180 million fellows, men and women, Nigeria has the highest number of compatriots in sub-Saharan Africa!

    OBJ should therefore not necessarily be the only compatriot standing. No more   fashionable cynicism and pessimism on the side lines with attendant paralysis by analysis. Lets us all do “an OBJ” and engage “at conversation with the centre, not sides” in “The Art of Thinking Together”. The third way is “wide” enough to enlist all compatriots. Today Nigeria  is confronted with an urgent challenge to unify its wonderful great diverse peoples, particularly  the millions of the oppressed poor, frustrated business men and women, youths and women in the re-construction of a common platform for development, for a just and  egalitarian society free of all oppression. Third way tasks our energy to ensure the pre-eminent participation of all its great people especially women and youths. A 48-hour response by presidential information mill (judging by the standard of Buhari slow motion government!) as articulated by Minister Lai Muhammed is refreshing. The self confession of the minister that the administration took OBJ’s constructive legitimate suggestions in good faith is even inspiring.

    Third way means a radical departure from present additive procrastinations while the nation is on its knees. It means elected officials talking to Nigerians with humility not through arrogant and often incompetent, unelected or unelectable proxies. Third way also calls for competency test for those who dare to canvass for our votes. Do they perceive Nigerians as citizens, or subjects in their conquered sovereigns? So much for apologetic governors “without apologies”! We must make the point that this is a republic of citizens with constitutionally guaranteed rights not a preferred “Shithole” of the rouge President Donald Trump of (sadly!) America. Minister Lai Muhammed dignified the administration as well as all Nigerians by reeling out government scorecards (even if some are not impressed). That is the third way; it’s neither the usual dismissiveness of the government in office nor the predictive unthinking cheer mob reactions of the so-called opposition.

     

    • Aremu mni, a labour activist, writes from Kaduna.
  • Don’t ignore Obasanjo’s letter, ex-NANS president tells Buhari

    Don’t ignore Obasanjo’s letter, ex-NANS president tells Buhari

    A former national president of the National Association of Nigerian Students (NANS) Comrade Jude Imagwe, has urged President Mohammadu Buhari not to ignore the letter written by former President Olusegun Obasanjo.

    Comrade Imagwe said President Buhari should heed to the advice of Obasanjo saying his administration has failed to meet the expectations of Nigerians.

    Imagwe who was a former Special Assistant on Youth and Students Affair to former President Goodluck Jonathan said it would amount to political suicide for any incumbent Nigeria President Obasanjo’s advice.

    The former NANS president stated that President Buhari should be thinking of handing over the leadership of the country to younger generation as seen in other developed countries.

    Imagwe said it was worrisome that the APC led administration refused to rejig its cabinet three years after assuming power.

    He noted that many ministers have failed to deliver on their mandate to Nigerians.

    He said, “Love or hate former President Obasanjo, he has hit the nail precisely on the head in this instance. APC should own up and stop any further ambition to the highest office especially with their foremost candidate. Buhari must begin to march his word with actions.

    “Any letter from Obasanjo cannot be ignored or thrown away. Most of the active players either public or private sector had work with Obasanjo, which means he assembled credible hands. If you have never been President you will not be in a better position to advice.

    “These are his views and observations from outside because he feels the pulse of the people. Some of the things he advised Buhari are things he wished to have done when he was in office and that is why he must take his advice seriously.

    “Obasanjo assembled minsters that were proactive and dedicated. The mere mention of FCT what come to mind is El’ Rufia, NAFDAC, you think of late Dora Akunyili and so many others

    “Jonathan also had ministers who are credible but that cannot be said with Buhari’s ministers and that is why the so called change agenda still remain a mirage.

    “Nigeria should be entrusted in the hands of the young generation and people who have succeeded in their chosen fields because they think better on how to move the Country forward. Buhari must stand up now and change his cabinet because none of his minsters can be said to be outstanding three years into his administration.”

  • Letter to Buhari: Obasanjo engaging in sensationalism – Shittu

    Letter to Buhari: Obasanjo engaging in sensationalism – Shittu

    Barely a week after former President Olusegun Obasanjo criticised President Muhammadu Buhari’s administration, the Minister of Communications, Adebayo Shittu, on Monday accused the elder statesman of “engaging in sensationalism.”

    He said Obasanjo has no right whatsoever to ask President Buhari to drop his 2019 re-election bid.

    Shittu, who was prevented from distributing Buhari’s re-election campaign caps at last week’s Federal Executive Council (FEC) meeting by the Secretary to the Government of the Federation, Boss Mustapha, said the ex- President  has no right to tell Nigerians who they should vote for in 2019.

    The minister said: “Obasanjo as a Nigerian has the right to hold an opinion. If Obasanjo holds an opinion that Mr. President has performed less than it should be, those of us who are in the position to know better has a right to also state the other side which perhaps Obasanjo is ignorant of.

    “You see, there are some people who enjoy engaging in sensationalism. With due respect to Gen. Obasanjo, if you take his history over the last 30 years, there is hardly any regime other than his own that he did not criticize except the late Gen. Sani Abacha, who didn’t wait for Obasanjo to criticize him before he was sent to the gulag.

    “So many Nigerians know that Obasanjo enjoys this type of sensationalisation. In any case, no matter what impression you have of me, do you have a right to tell me not to contest an election? I mean we should talk like people who are educated, who know our left from the right.

    “There are procedures for elections. President Buhari is a member of the APC and the APC has its rules and regulations as to how candidates will emerge. If members of the party feel that the President has not performed well enough, it is for them to show that during the primary election. It is not for anybody to short change Nigerians and prevent people from offering themselves for an election.

    “In any case, since Obasanjo is no more a member of our party, with due respect to him, it doesn’t lie in his mouth to tell us who among our party members or leaders to contest or not to contest. I think Nigerians should concede this privilege to members of APC to decide the fate of Mr. President when the primaries come.”

    Shittu said he was not guilty of breaking any law by distributing campaign materials, adding that all he did was a pronouncement of an intention.

    “It is true that the constitution and the electoral law talk of campaigns starting 90 days before elections, but there is no law stopping announcing intentions. There is a difference between campaigns and intentions,” he added.

     

  • Buhari meets Obasanjo at AU summit

    Buhari meets Obasanjo at AU summit

    Few days after giving a damning verdict on the Muhammadu Buhari administration in a “special statement”, former President Olusegun Obasanjo yesterday met with President Buhari in Addis Ababa, the Ethiopian capital.

    It was at the African Union (AU) headquarters shortly before the 30th Ordinary Session of the Assembly of Heads of State and Government of the African Union.

    Obasanjo, a wry smile on his firm lips and his face betraying some warmth, grips Buhari by the hand. He is sprightly and stylish in a blue embroidered agbada and a blue cap with white stripes.

    Buhari is smiling broadly, his mood apparently no expression of any animosity against Obasanjo over his controversial “open statement”.

    There were no discussions; just an exchange of pleasantries and cracking of jokes as the two leaders were joined by former Head of State Gen. Abdulsalami Abubakar, according to their aides at the scene.

    Gen. Abubakar  handed over power to Obasanjo in 1999.

    Obasanjo accused the Buhari’s administration of nepotism and failure to revive the economy, among others. He “advised” the president not to seek reelection. Besides, Obasanjo wrote off both All Progressives Congress (APC) and the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and offered to be in the vanguard of a movement to save Nigeria.

    The Presidency however said the former President might have been too busy to notice the government’s achievements, which it itemized, in a response by Minister of Information, Culture and National Orientation, Alhaji Lai Mohammed after the Federal Executive Council (FEC) meeting.

    The meeting between Buhari and Obasanjo was short – not more than two minutes.

    When Obasanjo entered the expansive hall, he went round to exchange pleasantries with some other African leaders attending the summit, before looking out for Buhari, who he approached.

    When the Summit opened, President Buhari told his fellow heads of state that the war against corruption had come to stay in Nigeria.

    Speaking on the theme of the summit, “Winning the fight against corruption: A sustainable path to African transformation.”

    Buhari said that Nigeria remained committed to fighting corruption “today,  tomorrow  and  the day after tomorrow”.

    He said his administration had gone far in its change agenda of which the fight against corruption is an important part.

    He stressed the need for strong institutions a necessary condition for winning the fight against corruption.

    To win the war, he said, African leaders must empower anti-corruption agencies and insulate them from political influence.

    Buhari cited a report that the continent lost $50 billion annually to illicit flow of capital.

    The manifestation of corruption in Africa, he said, is a demonstration of the need for strong leadership.

    He called on African nations to build synergy among the executive, judiciary and legislature to entrench good governance.

    He said that Africans, especially leaders, must have a change of mindset by prioritising accountability and transparency to succeed in the fight against corruption.

    He, however, noted that fighting corruption is not going to be a straight forward task as corruption will always fight back.

    Irrespective of any setback faced in the fight against corruption, Buhari said,  African leaders must remain resolute.

    He recommended, among other things, that an African youth congress against corruption be organised and criminal justice system be strengthened to win the anti-graft war.

    Also at the Summit, the AU and United Nations (UN)  signed a Framework Agreement for the Implementation of Agenda 2063 for Sustainable Development.

    UN Secretary-General António Guterres said after signing the agreement that strong cooperation with the AU was essential for the UN to be able to fulfill its mandate.

    The UN chief said the new agreements would help bolster the collaboration between the two organisations on a range of global issues.

    “For the United Nations, the most important partnership is the partnership with the African Union,” Guterres said, alongside Moussa Mahamat, Chairperson of the AU Commission.

    Guterres said across the three main pillars of the United Nations – development, peace and security, and human rights – the African continent was key to solving global problems.

    “The international community would not be able to have successes in development if Africa does not succeed in its development taking advantage of its youth ‘dividend’,” he said.

    He added that neither would the global community secure lasting peace and security if Africa is not able to manage not only its conflicts, but above all, to make strong effort at conflict prevention and resolution.

    “We will be side by side with the African Union in respecting African leadership in solving African problems to help in this regard,” he said, noting that Africa has also made admirable strides in human rights.

    “Today, we talk a lot about immigration. I have always seen African countries open their doors to refugees and migration,” the UN chief said, adding that this is a lesson other parts of the world could learn from.

    The agreement followed the signing at UN Headquarters in April 2017 of a landmark framework to strengthen partnership between the UN and the AU on peace and security, to help the two organisations better respond to the evolving challenges of peace operations.

    He noted that agriculture and livestock productivity on the continent were under threat and hunger rates continue to increase, and cited the close links among hunger, food insecurity and poverty.

    He flagged that the majority of undernourished people in Africa lived in conflict-affected countries, where hunger was almost twice as high when the crisis was protracted.

    He advocated for stronger commitment by governments, the AU and the UN to promote peace, human rights and sustainable development.

    “To build and sustain peace and address hunger and poverty, we need community-based approaches that build social cohesion and the capacity of local institutions and actors.

    “Improved governance that can deliver equitable services is essential,” he asserted.