Tag: Obasanjo

  • Jonathan’s performance will haunt Niger Delta, says Obasanjo

    Jonathan’s performance will haunt Niger Delta, says Obasanjo

    Former President of Nigeria, General Olusegun Obasanjo, has said that the Niger Delta region will suffer for the actions and inactions of his successor, Goodluck Jonathan.

    Jonathan, who lost to President Mohammadu Buhari hails from Bayelsa State in the Niger Delta.

    Obasanjo spoke yesterday while responding to questions shortly after he delivered the convocation lecture of the Benson Idahosa University in Benin City.

    He explained that he couldn’t have helped Jonathan do his job as Nigeria’s President after helping him secured the presidency.

    According to him, “To become Head of State was because of my performance in the war front. If General Gowon had not sent me the war front, he would not know whether I could perform or could not perform. He sent me to the war front and because I performed, we both shared the credit but if I had failed, he would not have shared the condemnation with me. I would have been alone.

    “I believe that the opportunity that availed itself in 2010 was for somebody from the minority to become the President of Nigeria. We should never lose such opportunity. What he did with it is entire up to him. What he did or did not do with it will reflect for a long time in that part of the country. There is no particular person who got there without the people.”

    Meanwhile, the former President has said that educating the masses is the right tool to defeat the Boko Haram insurgency.

    According to him, even if Nigeria wins the war against Boko haram insurgency on the military front, it still needs proper education of the masses to sustain the victory.

    He said Nigeria must give education the priority it deserves or the dream to have a great Nigeria would remain a pipe dream.

    The former President noted that the Nigerian government needs to combine the power of education and military in its fight against Boko Haram.

    Former President Obasanjo spoke in Benin City, Edo State, while delivering the 11th convocation lecture of the Benson Idahosa University.

    Speaking on the lecture, titled ‘Effective Educational System: A Panacea for Societal Development and Transformation’, Obasanjo said education remained the most powerful tool against the indoctrination of Boko Haram group.

    Obasanjo urged the government to be more truthful and appealing, as well as promote literacy in the North East.

    He said Boko Haram thrived in the North East because it is backwardness in education.

    According to him, “Do the needful to exterminate the scourge and social economic development of the area concern and talk with the group that is ready to talk.

    “Boko Haram thrives on indoctrination. Spreading hate messages to propagate its messages through popular media. If we are able to counter Boko Haram hate messages with education in our schools and the social media to dilute such messages and prevent people from being swayed by Boko Haram. The Nigeria airwaves and social media should also be accentuated with positive messages.”

     

    “We have to reverse the trend of educational backwardness of the North East because Boko Haram was a menace waiting to happen. Empowering the youth with skills and taking them off the yoke of unemployment and the promises of Boko Haram.”

    Obasanjo, who also blamed poor educational system for the massive youth unemployment in the country, said moulding of character was completely ignored by Nigerian tutors, noting that Nigeria depends on the power of education to resolve the massive youth unemployment, corruption, insecurity, infrastructural decay, as well as the poor state of the economy.

    Obasanjo was later honored with the Change Nigeria award of the university.

    Chancellor of the institution, Arch Bishop Margret Idahosa, praised President Obasanjo for honoring the school’s invitation, and described the former president as a close family member

  • Education, not war will defeat Boko Haram – Obasanjo

    Education, not war will defeat Boko Haram – Obasanjo

    Former President Olusegun Obasanjo has declared that even if Nigeria wins the war against Boko Haram sect on the military front, it still needs proper education of the masses to sustain the victory.

    The ex-president said Nigeria must give education the priority it deserves or the dream of having a great nation would remain a pipe dream.

    He noted that Federal Government needs to tackle Boko Haram insurgency from the power of education as it does militarily.

    He spoke while delivering the 11th convocation lecture of the Benson Idahosa University, Benin City, Edo State.

    Speaking on a topic titled: “Effective Educational System: A Panacea for Societal Development and Transformation,” Obasanjo said education remains the most powerful tool against the indoctrination of Boko Haram sect.

    He urged the federal government to be more truthful and appealing as well as promote literacy in the Northeast.

    He said Boko Haram thrives in the Northeast because of the region’s educational backwardness.

    He said,” Do the needful to exterminate the scourge and social economic development of the area concern and talk with the group that is ready to talk.

    “Boko Haram thrives on indoctrination. Spreading hate messages to propagate its messages through popular media. We must be able to counter Boko Haram hate messages with education in our schools and social media to dilute such messages of those who have been swayed by Boko Haram. The Nigeria airwaves and social media should be should also be accentuated with positive messages.”

    “We have to reverse the trend of educational backwardness of the Northeast because Boko Haram was a menace waiting to happen. Empowering the youth with skills and taking them off the yoke of the unemployed and the promises of Boko Haram.”

    Obasanjo, who also blamed poor educational system for massive youth unemployment said, moulding of character was completely ignored by Nigerian tutors.

     

  • Niger Delta will suffer for Jonathan’s actions – Obasanjo

    Niger Delta will suffer for Jonathan’s actions – Obasanjo

    Former president Olusegun Obasanjo has said the Niger Delta region will suffer for the actions and inactions of the immediate past president, Dr. Goodluck Jonathan.

    Jonathan, who lost the March 28 presidential election to President Mohammadu Buhari hails from Bayelsa, a state in the Niger Delta.

    Obasanjo spoke while responding to questions shortly after delivering a convocation lecture at the Benson Idahosa University, Benin City.

    The ex-president said he couldn’t have helped Jonathan to do his job as Nigeria President after helping him to secure the position.

    He said, “I became the Head of State because of my performance in the war front. If General Gowon had not sent me to the war front, he would not know whether I could perform or not. He sent me to the war front and because I performed, we both shared the credit. But if I had failed, he would not have shared the condemnation with me. I would have taken that alone.

    “I believe that the opportunity that afforded itself in 2010 was for somebody from the minority to on his self esteem become the President of Nigeria. We should never lose such opportunity. What he did with that opportunity is entirely up to him. What he did or did not do with it will reflect for a long time on that part of the country. There is no particular person who got there without the people.”

  • Obasanjo defends choice of Yar’ Adua as successor

    Obasanjo defends choice of Yar’ Adua as successor

    FORMER President Olusegun Obasanjo yesterday defended his choice of the late Alhaji Umaru Yar’Adua as his successor in 1997.

    Chief Obasanjo, who spoke on Channels TV, refuted some critics’ views that he might have applied poor judgment in picking the former Katsina governor to succeed him as President.

    The television crew was at the former President’s hilltop residence in Abeokuta, the Ogun State capital.

    Yar’Adua died in office after a protracted illness, paving the way for Dr. Goodluck Jonathan to assume office.

    Giving his opinion on some views of those who reviewed his book – My Watch – that he might have subtly alluded to his poor judgment by the way he criticises successive Presidents, Obasanjo maintained that contrary to the sectional views, his administration was guided by facts available and that he made the best judgment in the choice of members of his team and successor.

    According to him, those engaging in such criticisms did not have all the facts.

    His words: “Even if you take your son as your successor, you are not sure of what he will do when he gets there. Don’t ever kid yourself.

    “What do I know about any successor? What he presents. When he gets there he presents it differently.

    “We did our best, but if you say our best is not good enough, I will say, when it comes to your turn, do better.

    “With all the people that are available for successor, what we came up with was about the best that at that time we could think of.”

    Obasanjo said he could not have selected someone he knew was corrupt for the position of a President.

    He said: “Is it the one that we know are corrupt that we will now go and take? No!

    “If I give the job to the corrupt, will I be able to defend myself before God and man?” he asked.

  • I’m satisfied establishing public complaints commission – Obasanjo

    I’m satisfied establishing public complaints commission – Obasanjo

    Former president Olusegun Obasanjo on Tuesday said he always feel a sense of satisfaction for establishing the Federal Public Complaints Commission (FPCC) when he was a military Head of State.

    The ex-president said the satisfaction comes each time he hears over the radio, the less privileged people coming out to say how the commission had brought “justice and relief” to them over matters brought before it.

    Obasanjo spoke Abeokuta, Ogun State, when the Commissioner, Federal Public Complaints Commission in the state, Mrs. Oluyemisi Somorin-Dawodu, visited him at his home on the Presidential Hilltop Estate.

    The FPCC which has since mutated into the Public Complaints Commission (PCC) was established by Decree 31 of 1975 put in place by the then Supreme Military Council headed by Obasanjo.

    He noted that the commission was put in place to create an avenue where the defenseless, weak and ordinary people in the society could run to for justice.

    He said: As I listen to radio and hear the less privileged talk about the relief and justice they got through the assistance of the commission, then I have no regrets ever establishing the body.

    “Although I cannot say that the need we saw then has completely disappeared, but there have been testimonies of cases where the commission has come to the rescue of the helpless.”

    He said the commission still remain relevant in the country because the reasons that gave birth to its existence have not disappeared four decades after it was established.

     

  • NNPC should be replaced – El-Rufai

    NNPC should be replaced – El-Rufai

    • Full text of Malam Nasir El-Rufai, Governor of Kaduna State at the 2015 Wole Soyinka Centre Annual Media Lecture, delivered on 13 July 2015.

     

    There is every danger that addressing a topic like this might yield another exercise in vain lamentation when what our country needs to do is take and give effect to rational decisions about the oil sector. For instance, the discourse around the resource curse has had a deep resonance for many Nigerians because it vividly sums up the paradox between the huge earnings from oil and the reality of poverty and underdevelopment for most Nigerians.

    Thus we have jobless growth, a fact that statistics touting high GDP growth rates tend to obscure but which is painfully real for many people. And we continue to suffer the consequences of our affliction with the Dutch disease. The easy money from oil has led to the neglect of other endowments, most especially agriculture.

    Yet talk we must when a problem persists in the embarrassing dimensions that Nigeria’s oil debacle represents, in the hope that we can deepen understanding about the precise nature of the problem, and build national consensus about the possible solutions.

    Even the crafters of the topic of this lecture imply that something is rotten in the governance and outcomes of Nigeria’s oil industry. Yet they helpfully infuse an air of optimism by not describing it as oil misfortune.

    Thus I approach this assignment not as an fortune-teller, but as a Nigerian who has had the duty and the interest to pay more attention to this issue than most of my compatriots. During the Obasanjo years, I had the responsibility to constitute Oil and Gas Implementation Committee that led to the drafting of the original Petroleum Industry Bill as an instrument for reforming the oil sector.

    Eight years after the exit of that government, the PIB has not become law, mainly through the wilful neglect of the successor governments that prioritized their personalized stranglehold on the sector’s revenues above its reform and efficient performance for national benefit.

    We now have another chance to anchor our oil sector reform agenda on the current and projected realities in that sector. And we must do that in the knowledge that the world is not waiting for us, that while we dallied new suppliers have come in to the global oil business and buyers have more choice.

    Some of our traditional customers have become self-sufficient, while others have developed alternatives thus reducing their reliance on our ‘light, sweet crude oil’.

    Is there an oil fortune?

    In fiscal terms, the answer is a massive yes. That the revenues have de-clined, or not been used to build human capital or enduring physical infra-structure is another matter. Nigeria’s oil reserves relative to our population is puny by comparison to the Gulf states. But you only need to imagine what national budgets would look like without the oil receipts to appreciate the fact that some oil is better than no oil.

    And we are not talking peanuts here. Despite a 60% fall in oil price between June 2014 and the end of that year, Nigeria still earned USD 77 billion from oil exports in 2014. The Punch newspaper of 2 April 2015, quoting figures from the United States Department of Energy, placed oil export earnings for the year 2011 at USD 99 billion. Indeed in the five Jonathanian years, Nigeria earned nearly USD 500 billion from crude oil and gas sales.

    The 2014 earnings of $77 billion is rather small compared to the $246 billion that Saudi Arabia made, but it cannot be sniffed at. So there are oil fortunes and there are oil fortunes. What we need to interrogate is how responsibly we have managed that fortune, how diligently we have tried to expand and sustain it and whether having that national fortune has impacted significantly on the fortune of the average Nigerian.

    About 40% of Nigerians are estimated to be very poor. That is about 70 million living people living below the poverty line in a country that has earned at least 1trillion in current dollars from oil in 50 years. For our vast masses, oil is no fortune.

    It is more of a mirage, but a more insidious kind, because the fortune is visible in the lifestyles of a few thousands of the privileged elite but is stubbornly inaccessible to tens of millions of ordinary people. Our rich enjoy the lifestyles of the richest in the world, while our poor are truly the wretched of the earth. This inequality is most unfortunate.

    That wide gulf in living standards is clearly problematic. It is, in my view, a major responsibility of a democratic government to strive to move more people away from the attrition that extreme poverty inflicts. This is not attained by wishful thinking, or by merely affirming the intent. It is about managing our resources in a way that sustainably builds our people, diligently collecting revenues and applying them in a determinedly cost-effective and result-oriented manner.

    The best fortune a country can have is its people. But like many gems, they have to be polished and nurtured for their talents to glow. Spending efficiency and effectiveness is best reflected in outcomes such as more educated and healthy people, living longer lives productively and happily.

    That, for me, is the major reason we must seek to enhance and responsibly manage Nigeria’s oil fortune. It must become the people’s fortune.

    Sketching the Oil Industry

    Let us examine some statistics to give us a picture of the oil industry in Nigeria. In 2014, Nigeria was producing on the average about 2.2 million barrels of crude oil per day, while importing most of its daily consumption of 43.5 million litres of refined petroleum products.

    That reliance on imports of refined products has seen unsustainable expenses on questionable subsidy payments, exemplified by USD 8.99 billion in the 18 months between January 2012 and June 2013.

    About N971 billion was budgeted for subsidy payments in 2014 alone (more than twice that was eventually paid). You all recall how trillions of Naira were paid out as oil subsidy in 2011, when only N254 billion was appropriated

    No one has been successfully prosecuted for this scam. Huge deficits in gas supply have ensured that the country’s thermal plants cannot produce power at optimal levels. In the eight years leading up to 2014, joint venture production declined by 50.4%. Some 100,000 barrels per day, about five percent of total production, is estimated to be lost to organized theft.

    And we all dread the ease and rapidity with which supply shortages lead to endless queues, widespread panic and mortal consequences for the many victims of tanker accidents.

    The long and short of the situation of our oil industry is best exemplified by the parallel government called the NNPC. In 2012, it sold N2.77 trillion of ‘domestic’ crude oil but paid only N1.66 trillion to the Federation Account.

    In 2013, it earned N2.66 trillion but paid N1.56 trillion to FAAC, in 2014 N2.64 trillion but remitted N1.44 trillion, while between January and May 2015, it earned N733.36 billion and remitted only N473.2 billion!

    That means that the NNPC only remitted about 58% of the monies earned between 2012 and the first half of 2015. A company with the audacity to retain 42% of a country’s money has become a veritable parallel republic!

    The NNPC feels entitled to consume more resources than the 36 states, the FCT and the Federal Government combined! The example just given is only with respect to domestic crude oil sales. Similar leakages exist in NPDC, NAPIMS procurement and subsidiary budgets.

    How could a country so dependent on oil revenues have been so lax about the proper governance, efficiency and security of its oil industry?

    How can a mono-product economy be so relaxed that it takes up to 24 months or more to make decisions on vital oil industry projects? Why is it that in this most crucial of sectors it has been possible for briefcase companies to walk away with big assets, billion naira subsidy payments and ‘local content’ contracts?

    Can an oil industry with virtually no serious barriers to entry yield fortunes beyond a narrow circle? For so great are the miracles that oil has performed in the lives of a few, there is not much left for the many.

    Having strayed into lamentation in describing the Nigerian oil industry, let me quickly return to trying to draw lessons and to suggest ways by which we may successfully navigate a different track. We can agree that what passes for the oil industry is a mismanaged, costly, corrupt and grossly inefficient operation. These negatives are not the way to grow or retain fortune.

    So what should we consider doing?

    Let us first learn the appropriate lessons. We are neither immune from the laws of economics nor from the consequences of sheer folly.

    Now that more countries are producing and selling oil and gas, we can safely assume that barring a new phase of explosive global economic growth, oil will remain relatively cheap at the $50-$60 per barrel range, for the foreseeable future. What do we intend to do with these diminished earnings?

    If we persist in indulging our appetite to consume rather than save, import rather than produce domestically, or neglect to prioritize capital investments, we will simply sink deeper into poverty. We must resolve to spend wiser, and do more with less.

    Our general national orientation has been impacted for worse due to our attitude to the oil cash cow. Let us firmly resolve that growing our people’s potentials will be a primary goal, and that in the pursuit of that aim, we shall commit to an efficiently and transparently managed oil industry.

    We can demonstrate this new purpose by slaying three huge dragons:

    1) A fixation with public ownership and control of every major oil asset

    2) the corruption and distortion that oil subsidy is inflicting on our economy, and

    3) the NNPC in its current form is in our collective national interest.

    End the fixation with public ownership: You will recall the outcry when the Obasanjo government sold two of our refineries shortly before it left office in 2007. The successor-government reversed the sale.

    Eight years and millions of dollars in turn-around maintenance later, the refineries are at best a minor component of our supply sources for refined products while remaining a suction pump of our resources.

    One of the men whose purchase of the refineries was aborted is now building his own, and it can be expected to be more modern, far more efficient and more productive than the public facility we turned into an object of baseless veneration. Let us be realistic enough to choose the most pragmatic options when we confront national problems.

    We should incentivize competent investors to acquire majority shares and management control in all our refineries and sell to them crude oil at market prices, and remit the proceeds directly into the Federation Account!

    Tackle the corruption and distortion in subsidy regime: I daresay that the oil subsidy regime has neither grown our people nor guaranteed stability of refined product supplies. What subsidy has achieved is create a huge hole in the budget and a new array of overnight billionaires.

    The downstream oil business in Nigeria has morphed into one optimised for the pursuit of subsidy payments. We see thinly-disguised periodic hostage-taking as the subsidy barons seek to pry open government coffers. It is time to tackle the corruption in the subsidy regime.

    We can discuss how the resulting subsidy savings will be spent to improve lives, while guaranteeing stability of supply to the domestic market.

    We have a president with both the integrity to responsibly manage the savings and the experience of managing special interventions based on subsidy savings.

    Let us say bye to foreign exchange drains, opaque crude swaps, offshore processing agreements and other devices that have derailed and distorted the subsidy regime, to our national detriment.

    Reverse missed opportunities: I have already highlighted the fact that our country has neither saved nor wisely invested oil proceeds from the five oil booms that my sister Oby Ezekwesili identified.

    I may only add that the oil industry itself is a victim of this lack of proper investment. We have been as unable to utilize what it yields us as we are remiss about expanding what it can yield us, by prudent and focused re-investment.

    Nigeria’s oil reserves are not growing at a fast enough pace. The gas potential is still largely that, an untapped potential amidst pressing needs. Since Bonny LNG we have not been able to complete and commission any other – Brass and Olokola LNG projects remain on the drawing board. The implementation of the national gas masterplan has stalled since 2009.

    And so there is simply not enough natural gas collected and dried to feed our power turbines, industries and households. There has to be a commitment to sustained investments to stimulate a proper gas sector.

    The multiplier effects of this will be immense, from contributions to improving the country’s power capacity, fuel homes and industries, create jobs and improve export earnings. We must be ambitious about what we can achieve here.

    We similarly need to encourage more local refining, and not just to assure stability in the supply of refined products for the domestic market but to cut costs and save jobs.

    We also have untapped potentials in petrochemicals, which can help fast-track domestic industrial activity and improve export earnings.

    In short, we must take steps to reposition our oil and gas sector as one that is properly integrated into the national economy, helping to create jobs, raise skills level, drive industrialization and earn more from exports.

    The rents therefrom can then be applied towards investments in human capital, physical infrastructure and economic diversification.

    How do we attain this wish list?

    We need a mix of fresh strategic thinking and a firm commitment to reform. We need to define exactly what we want the oil industry to be and to achieve, and then define the structure that can best deliver it. An efficient and productive oil sector, able to create jobs, spur industrialization and earn more revenues requires that we tackle the monster that the NNPC has become.

    This country can no longer afford to maintain an NNPC that arrogantly, unlawfully and unconstitutionally spends an unhealthy proportion of national oil earnings on itself.

    We should replace the NNPC with brand new organizations that are fit for purpose: – among others – a commercialized and corporatized national oil company and new industry regulators.

    This new national oil company should be capitalized once and for all, and then freed to fend for itself like other national oil companies do, seeking its financing independently from the financial markets and paying due taxes and royalties.

    The corruption and nonchalance that have hobbled the NNPC are symptoms that its best days are over. We should give it a deserved funeral so that a new institution, active and nimble, can promptly replace it.

    NNPC’s subsidiaries and associated companies can be reviewed, restructured and privatized or commercialized as appropriate consistent with national interest and objectives.

    The government should review the Joint Venture strategy, with the governing principle being to shift the financing and operational risks to the markets and operators respectively.

    Government should avoid owing the oil companies, and should more proactively review the terms and implementation of the Production Sharing Contracts (PSCs) and concentrate on collecting the royalties and taxes due to it.

    No one is better qualified to do this than the person that birthed the NNPC through the merger of the NNOC and the Ministry of Petroleum in 1977 – President Buhari himself.

    No one can appreciate the gap between the vision of NNPC’s founding fathers, the beautiful baby of 1977 and the 38 year-old monster it has become better than President Buhari.

    The NNPC of today must make Chief Sunday Awoniyi of blessed memory squirm in his grave. Something fundamentally decisive must be done to tame this monster.

    We must have the political will to make all oil industry transactions transparent. There should be clear rules and processes for licensing, concessioning, procurement and contracting. Opaque systems tend to be corrupt, and it is time to shine the light.

    The president has already taken the commendable step of directing that all revenues be remitted either to the Federation Account or the consolidated revenue fund as required by sections 80 and 162 of the Constitution.

    President Buhari is therefore clear that oil industry revenues will no longer be treated as some slush fund of the federal government.

    It is the national consensus that we arrive at regarding the oil sector that we can finally codify in a new petroleum act, which should be a simply worded, concise piece of legislation that spells out the general governing principles for the industry. Specific matters can then be based on subsidiary legislation, regulations and agreements. Complex and densely worded laws conduce to opacity and should therefore be avoided.

    I am by no means underestimating the titanic struggles that might be necessary to change the Nigerian oil industry. The vested interests will be all out to thwart change and uphold the status quo. The media and civil society organizations (CSOs) have the major role of pushing for transparent disclosures and adherence to due process.

    No other institutions have the power of CSOs and media to advocate, educate and enlighten the public to support and demand the most pragmatic, rational and effective measures that can make Nigeria’s oil fortune become the people’s fortune. The media in particular must lead from the front in this effort.

    To be in a position to accurately educate, the media must itself be knowl-edgeable about the issues. Apart from the obvious advantages of having specialists leading the reporting of certain industries, the media performs an immense service when it affords the public the resources to partake in informed debate.

    And the media must enhance its capacity for follow-up, to focus on an issue long enough to report its resolution. It must use the Freedom of Information Act maximally to ensure that wrong-doing and impropriety are not protected by official secrecy. If we successfully remake the oil industry, we would have significantly remade our country.

    And our poverty stricken majority will be the better for it. This, ladies and gentlemen, is the burden of responsibility placed on us as leaders in our various spheres of influence.

    Thank you for listening. God bless the Federal Republic of Nigeria.

  • Obasanjo urges Nigerians to celebrate fellow citizens

    Obasanjo urges Nigerians to celebrate fellow citizens

    Former President Olusegun Obasanjo has said Nigerians do not appreciate their best until outsiders take the lead in identifying such people for honour and celebration.

    Obasanjo said human treasures abound in the country and urged Nigerians to make good use of them to foster unity, growth and development of Nigeria.

    The ex-President spoke yesterday in Abeokuta, the Ogun State capital, at a luncheon organised by his family in honour of Rev. Josiah Idowu-Fearon, who has just been appointed secretary-general of the World Anglican Communion.

    The luncheon took place at the Olusegun Obasanjo Presidential Library (OOPL).

    Obasanjo said: “One of the things we don’t often do well in Nigeria is that we don’t often see good in ourselves; and one of the things that God does fairly well for us is that He makes others to see the good in us.

    “I believe that is what has happened in the life of the man whom we are celebrating and honouring today. I believe that Bishop Idowu-Fearon, who is now the Secretary-General for the Global Anglican Communion falls into this category.”

    Rev. Idowu-Fearon described Obasanjo as a non-tribal and non-sectional Nigerian and leader, who has an undying passion to unite the country.

    He said his relationship with the former leader has shown that he “is a Nigerian that takes everyone together irrespective of religion, tribe anything.”

    In attendance at the event were the Alake and Paramount ruler of Egbaland, Oba Gbadebo Aremu Adedotun, the Onibara of Ibara, Oba Timothy Omolade, Ogun Deputy Governor Mrs. Yetunde Onanuga, Archbishop of Abuja Diocese of the Catholic Church, Cardinal John Onaiyekan and publisher of the Leadership newspaper, Sam Nda-Isaiah.

  • Fallout of N’Assembly polls: Saraki takes case to Obasanjo

    Fallout of N’Assembly polls: Saraki takes case to Obasanjo

    The search for peace in the camp of APC senators continued yesterday after the crisis provoked by the election of Senator Bukola Saraki as Senate President in controversial circumstances penultimate Tuesday.

    While Saraki visited former President Olusegun Obasanjo at his Presidential Hilltop Estate residence in Abeokuta, Ogun State to seek his elderly advice on the possible way forward, members of the Unity Forum, led by Sen. Ahmed Lawan, tabled a six-point demand before party leaders, upon which the group premised a possible end to the crisis.

    A statement issued by the media officer to the Senate President, Bamikole Omishore, said the visit to Obasanjo was in continuation of Saraki’s tour to draw from the wealth of experience and knowledge of elder statesmen across the country on ways to move the country forward.

    Saraki arrived Obasanjo’s home by 9:11 am and proceeded quickly to the ex – President’s inner chamber for private discussions. He emerged from the meeting about two hours, seven minutes after.

    On his entourage were Kawu Baraje; Senator Andy Uba; former Governor Zamfara State governor, Senator Sanni Yerima; former Osun State governor, Prince Olagunsoye Oyinlola; Senator Danjuma Goje and Senator Tayo Alasoadura

    A source close to Obasanjo’s home said the discussion revolved around how Saraki could foster unity in the 8th Senate, make peace with APC leaders who were not happy with his manner of emergence as Senate President, among others.

    Another source privy to the visit told The Nation that Saraki used the visit to seek Obasanjo’s support, following the acrimony that has trailed his emergence as Senate President.

    The source, a senator, said that Saraki wanted to rally round influential personalities in and outside the country to ensure a successful outing as President of the Eighth Senate.

    He said that the visit to some personalities in the country would not be limited to Obasanjo as Saraki was determined to “explain his emergence as Senate President to as many influential personalities as possible.”

    He added that “the increasing number of very important personalities visiting the Senate President is a pointer to the fact that he wants to reach out and consolidate his Senate Presidency.

    “It is normal, considering especially the bickering trailing his emergence as the Senate President,” he said.

    Saraki had told reporters in Abeokuta after a two-hour closed door meeting with Obasanjo that the crisis engendered by his emergence as Senate President would soon be resolved,

    Sàraki said: “We are here with colleagues to see the former President, as one of our fathers and former President, to pay our homage and visit to him, get his advice, get his blessing and also to consult.

    “We all know President Obasanjo’s value to this country and we are here to tap from that wisdom and that knowledge and experience.

    “I think as you can see, things are moving smoothly definitely. You should rest assured that all that would be put behind us shortly; we are very confident about that.”

    But aggrieved members of the Unity Forum, led by Senator Ahmed Lawan, have tabled six demands before the leadership of the APC for peace to reign in the upper chamber.

    They asked Saraki and his Like Minds group to concede key principal posts to them and rejected any fresh move to assign any principal office to the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP).

    But the President of the Senate had a meeting with a key member of the Unity Forum, ex-Governor Abdullahi Adamu, rejecting the proposal that the post of Majority Leader be conceded to Senator Ahmed Lawan.

    It was also learnt at press time that Asiwaju Bola Tinubu did not send any letter to the National Chairman of the All Progressives Congress (APC), Chief John Odigie-Oyegun, on the sharing of principal offices in either the Senate or the House of Representatives.

    Investigation by our correspondent revealed that as part of steps to reunite Saraki and Lawan groups, Oyegun met with members of the Unity Forum.

    It was learnt that at the session, the Lawan group opened up in a rare manner on the way forward.

    It was gathered that the team had the frank session with Oyegun alongside the Deputy National Chairman (North), Sen. Lawal Shuaib; the Deputy National Chairman (South), Engr. Segun Oni; and the National Secretary of APC, Mallam Mai Mala Buni.

    According to findings, the meeting was able to chart a “way forward” on how to reunite all APC Senators in the 8th Senate.

    At the end of the meeting, the Lawan group made the following demands:

    • APC leadership should instill discipline and intervene in the choice of some principal officers in the Senate.

    • It is better to leave the choice of some principal officers to APC than zonal caucuses in order not to further divide the governing party

    • Ranking must be considered in the selection of principal officers.

    • Concession of some principal offices to the Unity Forum including Ahmed Lawan (Majority Leader); George Akume (Deputy Majority Leader); Prof. Sola Adeyeye (Senate Whip); and Abu Ibrahim (Deputy Whip).

    • Reconciliation is possible if Saraki group does not play the politics of winner- takes- all

    • PDP should not be allowed to produce any principal officer except those due to it as the minority party in the Senate

    A highly placed source said: “The Lawan group warned against a repeat of what happened on the floor of the Senate which made the PDP to secure the Office of the Deputy President of the Senate.

    “The group asked the party to assert its authority, uphold discipline and put in place a win-win situation in order to move forward. It cautioned against recourse to geopolitical caucuses to select principal officers because it might deepen the crisis of confidence among the APC Senators.

    “The National Chairman of APC and his team were receptive to the suggestions of the Unity Forum. They were also optimistic that the APC in the Senate may reunite as one family.

    “At the end of the day, Oyegun asked Lawan group to submit its recommendations for some principal offices to the party in writing for consideration by the National Working Committee.”

    Another source said: “The Lawan group agreed to write this letter to Oyegun. And it was Senator Barnabas Gemade who was mandated to write the letter and not Asiwaju Bola Tinubu as being insinuated.

    “In fact, Tinubu had nothing to do with the talks between Lawan group and the APC leadership. It is sad to associate the APC National Leader with this development.

    “In the letter, the Unity Forum recommended the following Senators for principal offices as follows: Ahmed Lawan (Majority Leader); George Akume (Deputy Majority Leader); Prof. Sola Adeyeye (Senate Whip); and Abu Ibrahim (Deputy Whip).

    “The Unity Forum felt its members have respected the party and abided by its rules. Now that a reconciliation process is in place, the Forum believes that loyalty and discipline must be rewarded.

    “The letter of the Unity Forum was then discussed at the meetings of the National Working Committee of APC in the last few days.”

    Investigation revealed that when the Like Minds got wind of the conditions of the Unity Forum, the President of the Senate, Dr. Bukola Saraki, sought for an audience with ex-Governor Abdullahi Adamu, who is a respected member of the Lawan group.

    “At the meeting with Adamu, Saraki rejected the proposal to make his arch-rival, Sen. Ahmed Lawan, the Senate Leader. He said it is dangerous to give his co-contestant a sensitive position like that and that he would not accept it.

    “This has been the scenario playing out and the two groups have been weighing options. Those in the Like Minds want a winner-takes-all politics whereas the Unity Forum is obediently playing along with APC leadership in its reconciliation process.”

    As at press time, it was gathered that some members of the Unity Forum have insisted that the group should pursue its case in court against Saraki’s election to its logical conclusion.

    “Some members of the Unity Forum are of the opinion that any power sharing formula arrived at with Saraki and the Like Minds should be temporary and without prejudice to the court case.

    “I think we have some Senators who are not ready to give up on the matter in court,” a third source added.

  • Saraki visits Obasanjo over 8th Senate

    Saraki visits Obasanjo over 8th Senate

    Senate President, Bukola Saraki, on Friday morning stormed the former President Obasanjo’s residence on Presidential Hilltop Estate, Abeokuta, the Ogun state capital, to consult with Obasanjo over the 8th Senate and other national issues.

    Saraki was elected Senate President unopposed last June 9 by 57 out of the 108 senators in a manner his party deemed a betrayal, treachery and unacceptable.

    While the process leading to his election and subdequent swearing – in  lasted at the Senate Chamber, 51 senators mainly APC members, including Senator Ahmed Lawan, were absent.

    Since his emercence as Senate President, the former Kwara State governor  has been working to assure his disatisfied party leaders and members of his commitment to APC on one hand, and quality legislation for Nigerians on the other hand.

    On Friday morning, Saraki arrived Obasanjo’s home by 9:11 am   and proceeded quickly to the ex – President’s inner chamber for private discussions.

    In his entourage are Kawu Baraje, Andy Uba, former Governor of Zamfara state, Senator Sanni Yerima, former Governor of Osun state, Prince  Olagunsoye Oyinlola, Danjuma Goje and  Senator Alaso Adura

    Source close to the Obasnjo’s home said the discussion would revolve how Saraki can foster unity in the 8th Senate, make peace with the APC leaders among others issues.

  • Court strikes out Kashamu’s N20b libel suit against Obasanjo

    Court strikes out Kashamu’s N20b libel suit against Obasanjo

    •Senator claims on-going settlement moves     •Extradition proceedings open June 25

    Justice Valentine Ashi of the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) has struck out a suit by a chieftain of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Senator Buruji Kashamu, against former President Olusegun Obasanjo.

    The decision followed an application for withdrawal filed by Kashamu, who claimed that parties were engaged in on-going settlement moves.

    Obasanjo’s lawyer denied knowledge of such moves.

    Kashamu had on February 6, last year, sued Obasanjo, asking the court to award N20billion as aggravated and exemplary damages, and another N100million against the former President for “maliciously and recklessly” publishing a letter titled: ‘Before it is too late’, addressed to ex-President Goodluck Jonathan in December 2013

    The PDP chieftain sued Obasanjo for libel in relation to the claims in the letter that he (Kashamu) is a fugitive wanted in the United States for drug-related offences.

    Trial had progressed in the case, with Kashamu calling two of his three intended witnesses.

    Haruna Rasheed and Omotayo  Alade-Fawole claimed that the publication of the ex-President’s letter in the media portrayed Kashamu in bad light.

    Proceedings were later stalled in the substantive case when Kashamu on December 5, last year, moved the court to grant a restraining order against Obasanjo.

    The senator sought to stop the former President from proceeding with the scheduled public launch of his book titled: “My Watch” on the ground that the subject of the libel suit was contained in the book.

    Despite the order of December 5, Obasanjo launched the book on December 9 in Lagos.

    Kashamu returned to  court the following day with the complaint that Obasanjo breached the December 5 order by proceeding to launch the book.

    Justice Ashi, in a ruling, held that Obasanjo was in contempt of court for flouting his orders restraining him from among others, publishing the book.

    The judge gave the former President 21 days (from the day of service of the court’s orders on him)  to show cause why he should not be punished for contempt for going ahead to publish  the book despite the ex-parte interim order made by the court on December 5 and a pending libel suit involving him.

    The judge later lifted all orders against Obasanjo in a ruling delivered in April, following counter arguments by Obasanjo’s lawyer, Mahmud Magaji (SAN).

    Proceedings were to resume on the main libel case, which Kashamu brought an application for withdrawal last month.

    The PDP chieftain hinged his application on a purported “on going settlement moves” by parties.

    Although Obasanjo’s lawyer denied knowledge of any on-going settlement move, he did not oppose Kashamu’s application to withdraw, following which Justice Ashi struck out the case in a ruling given on May 26.

    Justice Gabriel Kolawole of the Federal High Court, Abuja, will, next Thursday, open hearing in an extradition application filed against Kashamu.

    The application filed by  former Attorney General of the Federation (AGF) Mohammed Adoke (SAN) sought the court’s permission to transfer Kashamu to the US for trial on drug-related offences.

    The extradition application filed on May 28 was said to have followed a request by the  US Embassy in April, urging the Federal Government to surrender Kashamu for trial in the US on  one count charge of conspiracy and unlawful importation of illicit drug before the United States District Court for the Northern Illinois, Eastern Division.