Tag: Obasanjo

  • Obasanjo: I landed in jail because I couldn’t keep my mouth shut

    Obasanjo: I landed in jail because I couldn’t keep my mouth shut

    Former President Olusegun Obasanjo has disclosed that his inability to keep his mouth shut on national and international issues led him to jail under the military junta of the late Head of State, General Sani Abacha in 1995.

    Obasanjo was accused of being involved in what was derided as phantom coup to topple the then military dictator, Abacha, tried by a military tribunal, found guilty and sentenced.

    However, speaking during an interactive session with 15 young male and female future Africa leaders drawn from different parts of the continent at his Olusegun Obasanjo Presidential Library (OOPL) at the weekend, Obasanjo said going to prison was a challenge to him because he refused to keep quiet on issues that happened in the country at the time.

    The elder statesman, who tasked the youth on positive leadership roles for the continent, said his prison experience was part of the challenges of life he personally had, and the journey to it started with his inability to always keep mute.

    Read Also; Only 30% of vehicles insured, says IGP

    Obasanjo said: “I joined the army at the age of 42. I finished my career as a military officer, but what could I do? I was still energetic and dynamic but I was still young. So, I took to agriculture, and during that time, I went into prison, and that is not what I really wanted.

    “Going into prison is really a challenge because I refused to keep quiet. For me, if there was anything to comment on, I did comment on them, and so, I landed in prison, and that is a challenge.

    “And, when I came out from prison the situation was bad in the country that some people felt the need to be saved and pressure started coming.”

    He also hinted that the quest to save Nigeria from imminent disintegration made him to seek the Presidency in 1999, admitting that he had settled into agriculture after his military service at age 42 before the quest came.

    And in a statement by his Special Assistant on Media, Kehinde Akinyemi, the former President urged the budding youths under the aegis of Future Africa Leaders Foundation who came with the 10 winners of the Prestigious and Life Challenging Future Africa Leaders Awards, to bear the torch of light and leadership for a better Nigeria and African continent.

    Fielding question on African debts, he lamented that the debt profiles of some countries were due to recklessness and outright corruption.

    “Most of the debts cannot be explained. Some, outright corruption,” he said, citing a particular state in Nigeria where the site for a carpet industry was never cleared and the entire loan was repaid.

    He commended the participants and organisers, particularly the founder of the Future Africa Leaders Foundation, Pastor Chris Oyakhilome, for hosting the 2024 edition of the programme yet again. 

    The Star Prize winner of the 2024 edition, Julian new Ariori, from the Republic of Benin, on behalf of her co-winners thanked the former President for hosting the team, hinting that the tour of the Presidential Library opened a new vista to orientation and exposure of the visiting team.

    Others include those from Libya, Morocco, Guinea Bissau, Kenya, South Sudan, Malawi, Egypt and Cameroon.

    There were also others from Togo, Ghana, Lesotho, Rwanda and Burkina Faso, with the Head, Media and Government Relations of the Foundation, Pastor Sylvester Ebhodaghe, as the Chaperon of the visiting team.

  • What does ex-President Obasanjo want?

    What does ex-President Obasanjo want?

    Sir: Former president, Olusegun Obasanjo, remains one of the African political legends of all time. He is one of the two Nigerians privileged to have led this country both as a military leader and democratically elected president; the other, being Muhammadu Buhari, also a retired general. 

    Indeed, Obasanjo is an illustrious Nigerian and veteran of many battles. But, unlike other former heads of state – Yakubu Gowon, Muhammadu Buhari, Goodluck Jonathan, Abdulsalami Abubakar, and Ibrahim Babangida who have all elected to remain in the background, preferring to contribute their respective quotas to the growth and development of the country whenever they’re called to do so, the Owu-born retired General has remained in the limelight even 18 years after his tenure, critiquing his successors’ programs and policies.  

    Nigerians vividly recall how Obasanjo attempted to usurp the Umaru Yar’Adua presidency until the former Katsina governor gave up the ghost. He terrorized Goodluck Jonathan and his regime for six years simply because the Otuoke born former governor wouldn’t pander to his whims. Of course, the immediate past president, Buhari rebuffed and kept him at distance throughout his regime.

    As the new regime of Bola Tinubu berthed, Obasanjo has remained undaunted and undeterred, even to the extent of recently deploying the platform of an international forum far away in United States of America – The Chinua Achebe Leadership Forum lectures – to harass and accuse the government of unsubstantiated allegations of corruption.   

    The latest is his recent allegation that the government through the NNPLC squandered over $2 billion on the rehabilitation and construction of refineries and, yet, the refineries are still not working. This is sequel to NNPCL’s announcement of a turn-around in the fortunes of both the old Port Harcourt Refinery and the Warri Refinery.

    Read Also: Women Affairs Minister celebrates Ibijoke Sanwo-Olu on 58th birthday 

    This writer would like to remind the ex-president that no king reigns forever. Nature has conditioned it that every leader spends a specific period to reign and if that time expires, embrace spirit of equanimity and contentment to vacate.

    What respected and leaders with dignity do is leave the ovation when it’s loudest. 

    Eighteen years after his second reign as democratic leader is enough time for the ex-president to have prepared to completely leave the political scene. His dominance in the public space to critique government policies and programs is unwarranted and undesirable.

    At 87+, he should largely be within the confines of Abeokuta and Ota, playing with his grandchildren and great grandchildren, do more philanthropic projects at least with the stupendous fortunes he has amassed over decades.

    •Kola Amzat (FCA, FCIB)Lagos.

  • PHOTOS: Tinubu meets Obasanjo, Jonathan at Mahama’s inauguration

    PHOTOS: Tinubu meets Obasanjo, Jonathan at Mahama’s inauguration

    President Bola Tinubu meets former presidents Olusegun Obasanjo and Goodluck Jonathan during the swearing-in event of John Drahami Mahama, the new president of Ghana, on Tuesday, January 7.

    Read Also: We’ll lift Africa out of poverty, says Tinubu

  • Francis Ngannou visits Obasanjo in Ogun

    Francis Ngannou visits Obasanjo in Ogun

    Renowned Mixed Martial Arts (MMA) fighter, Francis Ngannou recently met with former Nigerian President Olusegun Obasanjo at his office in Abeokuta, Ogun State.

    Ngannou shared photos of the meeting on his Instagram handle, expressing his gratitude for the opportunity to receive words of wisdom from the Nigeria’s former leader.

    He wrote: “It was an honor meeting the legendary former Nigerian president, H.E. Olusegun Obasanjo, yesterday at his home office in Abeokuta. It was great receiving some words of wisdom from the legend.”

    Ngannou’s visit to Nigeria follows his Christmas holiday in Cameroon.

    Read Also: Davido crowns Francis Ngannou winner over Tyson Fury

    During his stay, he was spotted socialising with celebrities like Burna Boy and Kamaru Usman in Lagos.

    This visit marks Ngannou’s return to Nigeria after his successful debut with the Professional Fighters League (PFL), where he achieved a first-round knockout victory over Ricardo Ferreira.

  • Obasanjo and NNPCL refineries

    Obasanjo and NNPCL refineries

    • By Simbo Olorunfemi

    That former president, Olusegun Obasanjo has an almost child-like emotional attachment to the public-owned refineries under the trust and care of the NNPCL is not in doubt. It is also not difficult to explain why that appears to be the case. He can indeed assert some level of claim/credit for the construction of two of Nigeria’s publicly owned four refineries. While the decision to construct the second and third refineries in Warri and Kaduna respectively was taken in 1974, with construction on the third set to only commence “whenever the projection of the consumption of petroleum products justifies it”, by early 1975, fuel shortages made it necessary to proceed with its construction soon after.

    The Warri Refinery, whose contract was awarded in 1975 before Obasanjo became Head of State, was completed and commissioned in 1978 while he was in office. The contract for the construction of the Kaduna Refinery was awarded in 1977 and commissioned in 1980.

    One interesting fact is that the construction of these refineries was under the direct supervision of Muhammadu Buhari who was appointed Federal Commissioner (Minister) for Petroleum and Natural Resources in March 1976 and chairman of the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation when it was created in 1977, a position he held until 1978.

    So, it must have been heart-breaking for Obasanjo to meet the refineries in a state of much disrepair when he returned as president in 1999. Such was the state of the refineries that even with so much money expended on ‘Turn-around maintenance’ of the refineries while he was in office, there was no turn-around in fortune for the refineries that he had to put them up for sale a few weeks to the end of his administration.

    For the Port Harcourt refinery, Blue Star, a consortium of Nigerian companies – Zenon Oil, Dangote Oil, and Gas & Transnational Corp. outbid UK-based Indian steel baron, Lakshmi Mittal, who had offered $550 million. The Dangote-led Blue Star, made up of Obasanjo’s associates, paid $561 million to acquire 51% of the government-owned stake in the refinery. There were two other bidders – Oando Plc as well as Sahara Energy in conjunction with Refinee PetroPlus, but the two were disqualified in a process conducted by the BPE. Bluestar will follow up with the buy-in in Port Harcourt to, soon after, also take a 51% stake in the Kaduna Refining Company.

    In what was a strange twist of irony, it was Obasanjo’s anointed successor in office, President Umaru Yar’Adua, who, within only a few months of assumption, took a different position on the sale of the refineries, which prompted Blue Star to pull out of the deal. Obasanjo, who never hid his pain, and tried to prevail on his successor without success, cannot get over the turn of events.

    He often recoils at how Yar’Adua baulked under pressure and cancelled the sale. “The refineries are old and Dangote and some investors paid $750 million for two of the refineries. My successor came to office and reversed the sale. He even refunded the money they paid. So I went to him and asked him why he did this. He said it was because of pressure. So I wondered if the pressure by some people was more important than the interest of the whole nation,” he once recalled.

    Even though the reversal of the Obasanjo sale took place over 17 years ago, and the administrations that succeeded further moved in the opposite direction, Obasanjo has refused to accept that any approach other than the one he took will ever work. To him, the refineries did not work with him, and they can never work under any other dispensation no matter what is done, which is quite intriguing.

    Read Also: Why we had to remove fuel subsidy, by Tinubu

    Whereas Obasanjo anchored his decision to sell as pro-Nigeria and the reversal of the sale as anti-Nigeria, those who cancelled the sale obviously thought otherwise. In the first place, the sale was greeted by widespread criticism from the public, with the main accusation then being that the sale did not follow due process. Indeed, NNPC and DPR spoke up against it, just as the labour unions, especially NUPENG and PENGASSAN were up in arms against it. They claimed that “the sale of the two firms was completely lacking in transparency”, that no due diligence was carried out, and that the Port Harcourt refinery was worth about US$5 billion, roughly nine times the amount it was sold for. Indeed, the sale of the refineries to Bluestar was one of the grounds for a general strike that paralysed the Nigerian economy for four days in June 2007.

    So, while the reversal of the sale is often cited, these days, as a major setback, not everyone agrees with that. Not everyone saw the decision to sell the refineries as the right one. In his interviews with the media on the subject, Obasanjo usually anchors his argument that the refineries can never work on the conversation he said he heard with top Shell executives whom he had invited to take a stake in the refinery and manage it. Shell, he said, gave four reasons for declining his offer. According to him, the Shell executive said: “First of all, they make a major profit from upstream, not from downstream. He said they run downstream just to keep their head above water.

    “Two, our refineries were too small: 60,000 barrels 100,000 barrels and I think 120,000 barrels. He said that at that time, the average refinery was going for 250,000 barrels.

    “Three, he said our refineries were not well maintained. Four, he said that there was too much corruption around the activities of our refineries and they would not want to get involved in that.”

    But looking at these reasons said to have been given by Shell, none of them is novel or suggestive that Shell saw the refineries as beyond redemption, as Obasanjo concluded. Indeed, it is well known that the refinery business is not the most profitable and that upstream is more profitable than downstream. It is easy to understand why Shell, which is not even a player in the Nigerian downstream sector, will not be interested in running a refinery, even with corruption out of consideration. It is ironic that observations made by Shell will make such a lasting impression on Obasanjo that he will shut out any suggestion that does not endorse the impression he formed.

    It is instructive that following years of fits and starts under different administrations, with efforts at ‘turnaround maintenance’ not yielding lasting results, President Muhammadu Buhari who had worked with President Obasanjo in the past, will then take the bold step of shutting down the refineries and commissioned a complete rehabilitation of the four refineries, as different from the TAMs in 2021. At the time, the NNPCL CEO, Mele Kyari said: “I have said it over and over that we have not taken care of these refineries over the years, that we have mismanaged the turnaround maintenance work over time in the last 20+ years, these plants have degenerated to a level that today, we are not turning around but resuscitating them, which is different from TAM.”

    Apparently, many didn’t understand the difference then, even as many still don’t understand it now, thus going off tangent in their expectations of what the refineries can deliver. At the time the contract for rehabilitation was awarded, some people had also made the point that a new refinery could have been built instead of rehabilitating the old ones, but Mele Kyari explained then:

     “We have people saying why not build a new one; why will you repair an old refinery with $1.5 billion? The fact is available even by Google search, what it takes to build a refinery of this status today.” 

    “It will be difficult for the country to build a new refinery as it will take four years for it to commence production. It is around $7 billion and $12 billion to construct a refinery of this nature (Port Harcourt refinery),” Kyari argued.

    Atedo Peterside submitted then that NNPC would only “enmesh Nigeria into a deeper financial mess by throwing $1.5 billion at a problem it created,”, while Prof Pat Utomi argued that “The decision of federal government to invest $1.5 billion in the repair of Port Harcourt refinery is unwise, unreasonable and has no basis.”

    Indeed, only a few gave the NNPCL a chance with the rehabilitation of the refineries, with trust further eroded by multiple failures to deliver to its schedule. But things have turned around in the last two months with the commencement of production in the old wing of the Port Harcourt refinery, and last week’s resumption of production at the Warri refinery, with indications that the Kaduna refinery would be going on stream soon.  The club of cynics and sceptics is fast thinning out.

    Obasanjo appears unconvinced though. “I was told not too long ago that since that time, more than $2 billion have been squandered on the refineries and they still will not work. If a company like Shell tells me what they told me, I will believe them. But here we are, over $2 billion squandered, and the refineries still won’t work,” Obasanjo declared. It might be that Obasanjo is of the mind that the rehabilitation work that was done at the refineries is of the standard that was presented to him as having been done in the past, not realising that this is clearly beyond that, with experts positing that what we have now is virtually a new plant.

    NNPCL has responded appropriately with its Chief Corporate Communications Officer, Olufemi Soneye, extending an invitation to the former president for a tour of the newly completed refineries to witness first-hand the state of operations there. President Obasanjo has a reputation for being forthright and candid. One expects him to honour this invitation and share with Nigerians his impression thereafter. That is the right and honourable thing to do.

    •Olorunfemi works for a Nigerian communications consultancy and publisher of Africa Enterprise.

  • Obasanjo’s faux pas

    Obasanjo’s faux pas

    Armed with a Yoruba proverb that all but implied that the Nigerian National Petroleum Company Ltd (NNPCL) told lies to the public about the scale of its refineries restoration, former president Olusegun Obasanjo scorned the efforts of the Bola Tinubu administration in the downstream sector. Two of the refineries, Old Port Harcourt and Warri, have been restored and are operating at about two-thirds capacity. The former president was careful enough to stop short of doubting the restoration of the refineries in their entirety, but he insinuated that the scale was far less than the company announced. He did not avail the public the details of the information he had about the scale of production he offhandedly questioned. He would not be trapped.

    In an interview he gave Channels Television, he spoke about his doubts that Nigerian refineries could ever be restored, especially following the submissions by Shell Nigeria that the plants were too complicated, obsolete and potentially susceptible to corruption to become a profitable line of business for a company that finds the downstream sector of the oil business more profitable. But in the same breath, he tried to justify offloading the refineries at $750m to the consortium put together by business magnate Aliko Dangote. Chief Obasanjo reposed trust in Shell Nigeria’s summation, but nevertheless approved the Dangote/Femi Otedola/Transcorp deal, a deal he lamented his successor, the late Umaru Yar’Adua, ‘unwisely’ revoked. The former president then concluded that the about two billion dollars spent on revitalising the refineries do not justify the scale of the ongoing restoration. But, from all indications, he would have, through his equity in Transcorp, benefited from the Dangote consortium deal, a deal he hammered out in the closing weeks of his presidency without any shred of transparency. Surely, there is a limit to bellyaching. NNPCL has asked him, of course with a hint of sarcasm, to visit the restored refineries. He won’t. He will have a fit if he visits and sees the plants buzzing.

    Read Also: Endangered species: Nigerians with albinism at receiving end of climate change

    Chief Obasanjo’s position on the refineries has of course been dismissed by many critics who accuse him of being a wet blanket and an envious politician stunned by the current administration’s successful restoration of the facilities. He is now faced with the ordeal of witnessing the refineries restored to near capacity, and the commissioning of private refineries projected both to curb the importation of refined petroleum products and make Nigeria a net exporter of fuel, as indeed the Dangote refinery is already doing. The former president may be loth to admit his fallibility, but the fact is that he is as vulnerable as he is fallible, and his political and business judgements, which he believes to be sacrosanct, are questionable.

    In his eight years as president, while he achieved some remarkable feats, he also made appalling decisions about his party, the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), about governors whom he disliked and got impeached, about respect for democratic principles, and after many rigmaroles and riding roughshod over the electoral system, ended up saddling the country with political liabilities and ill-fated succession. But despite these failings, and despite seeming to defy gravity after many years out of office, he has maintained some relevance in national affairs, with politicians organising pilgrimages to his residence to seek support for their ambitions or at least mute his waspish tongue.

    In a little over two years, Chief Obasanjo will be 90 years old. Already, he belongs to the exclusive class of former Nigerian leaders who have lived very long and satisfactorily, and the small percentage of Nigerians (0.35%) who live above 80. Nature and divinity have been very kind to him, gifting him leadership of Nigeria as a military leader and as twice elected president, not to talk of international recognition that makes him an exceptional Nigerian. He has of course not requited nature for those gifts, nor performed with distinction the assignments he messianically claimed heaven had devolved to him. But not being one to be incommoded by protestations from any quarters, he has pranced all over the country and the world, posing as God’s most accomplished gift to his country and perhaps to the black man.

    Yet his age and experience should instruct him otherwise. He is becoming infirm despite his best efforts, is stooping slightly when he had been ramrod all his life, and regardless of his avowal to stay on this side of heaven on and on and on, perhaps mummifying in the process, he has fewer years ahead of him than behind him, much fewer. A smart and sensitive and visionary leader should seize the time left to bind up wounds, heal divides, make peace with avowed enemies, and create an environment around his image that would make Nigerians genuinely grieve his departure. Instead, he is making more enemies, casting aspersion on everyone diametrically opposed to his rather rudimentary views and philosophy of life, and egregiously fouling the national well of trust by still seeking to impose leaders on the nation despite his infamous incompetence in judging people’s and leaders’ character. No one in Nigeria has been so gifted with the chance to forge a golden image for himself, and no one has been so extraordinarily adept at frittering away the chance.

    The NNPCL affair was an opportunity to encourage the nation about its possibilities, even musing, probably with an ironic smile, how he almost misjudged the matter when he was president and pestered by greed. It was an opportunity to display nobility by sending a disarming message to his arch enemy, President Bola Tinubu, to work harder to get the other refineries back to life. But no. Having jumped into the trenches and muckraked during electioneering in 2022 and 2023, and having come a cropper in the process, he must keep up his old animosities to the very end by scorning every effort to revivify mothballed or ageing facilities. Chief Obasanjo was sculpted to be a national lodestar, perhaps unfairly to the rest of Nigeria, but he has remained transfixed on desecrating his gifts and diminishing his unique opportunities.

    All is, however, not lost. Chief Obasanjo has promised himself many more years on earth, of course, leaving God no choice. In theory, and ignoring his flighty nature, he can make amends and be the man nature and heaven designed him to be. No one dares hope for his sake that he will fail to grab the chance with both hands. Should he, therefore, have a rethink, the country will be waiting eagerly to send him forth in a blaze of glory. He may not deserve it, having pipped the country at the post as it were, but it would be worth the effort for a beleaguered nation in search of heroes. He may not even have drawn the right lessons from the legacy of the late US president Jimmy Carter, whom he recommended to leaders everywhere to emulate, but his many leadership misdeeds and the damaging superficiality of his decisions will probably be glossed over should he, in the twilight of his years, foster the ethnic and political reconciliation Nigeria deeply yearns for. Hopefully he will seize the flicking moment. 

  • Baba Obasanjo and the NNPCL Refineries

    Baba Obasanjo and the NNPCL Refineries

    By Simbo Olorunfemi 

    That Baba Obasanjo has an almost child-like emotional attachment to the public-owned refineries under the trust and care of the NNPCL is not in doubt.

    It is also not difficult to explain why that appears to be the case. 

    He can indeed assert some level of claim/credit for the construction of 2 of Nigeria’s publicly owned 4 Refineries.

    While the decision to construct the second and third refineries in Warri and Kaduna respectively was taken in 1974, with construction on the 3rd set to only commence “whenever the projection of the consumption of petroleum products justifies it”, by early 1975, fuel shortages made it necessary to proceed with its construction soon after.

    The Warri Refinery, whose contract was awarded in 1975 before General Obasanjo became Head of State, it was completed and commissioned in 1978 while he was in office. 

    The contract for the construction of the Kaduna Refinery was awarded in 1977 and commissioned in 1980.

    One interesting fact is that the construction of these Refineries was under the direct supervision of Muhammadu Buhari who was appointed Federal Commissioner (Minister) for Petroleum and Natural Resources in March 1976 and Chairman of the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation when it was created in 1977, a position he held until 1978.

    So, it must have been heart-breaking for Baba Obasanjo to meet the Refineries in a state of much disrepair when he returned as President in 1999. Such was the state of the refineries that even with so much money expended on ‘Turn-around maintenance’ of the refineries while he was in office, there was no turn-around in fortune for the refineries that he had to put them up for sale a few weeks to the end of his administration.

    For the Port Harcourt Refinery, Blue Star, a consortium of Nigerian companies Zenon Oil, Dangote Oil, and Gas & Transnational Corp. outbid UK-based Indian steel baron, Lakshmi Mittal, who had offered $550 million. 

    The Dangote-led Blue Star, made up of Baba Obasanjo’s associates, paid $561 million to acquire 51% of the government-owned stake in the refinery. 

    There were two other bidders – Oando Plc as well as Sahara Energy in conjunction with Refinee PetroPlus, but the two were disqualified in a process conducted by the BPE. Bluestar will follow up with the buy-in in Port Harcourt to, soon after, also take a 51% stake in the Kaduna Refining Company.

    In what was a strange twist of irony, it was Baba Obasanjo’s anointed successor in office, President Umaru Yar’Adua, who, within only a few months of assumption, took a different position on the sale of the refineries, which prompted Blue Star to pull out of the deal. Baba, who never hid his pain, and tried to prevail on his successor without success, cannot get over the turn of events. 

    He often recoils at how Yar’Adua baulked under pressure and cancelled the sale.

     “The refineries are old and Dangote and some investors paid $750 million for two of the refineries. My successor came to office and reversed the sale. He even refunded the money they paid. So I went to him and asked him why he did this. He said it was because of pressure. So I wondered if the pressure by some people was more important than the interest of the whole nation,” he recalls.

    Even though the reversal of the Obasanjo sale took place over 17 years ago, and the administrations that succeeded further moved in the opposite direction, Baba Obasanjo has refused to accept that any approach other than the one he took will ever work. To him, the refineries did not work with him, and they can never work under any other dispensation no matter what is done, which is quite intriguing.

    Whereas Baba anchored his decision to sell as pro-Nigeria and the reversal of the sale as anti-Nigeria, those who cancelled the sale obviously thought otherwise. In the first place, the sale was greeted by widespread criticism from the public, with the main accusation then being that the sale did not follow due process.

    Indeed, NNPC and DPR spoke up against it, just as the Labour unions, especially NUPENG and PENGASSAN were up in arms against it. They claimed that “the sale of the two firms was completely lacking in transparency”, that no due diligence was carried out, and that the Port Harcourt refinery was worth about US$5 billion, roughly nine times the amount it was sold for. Indeed, the sale of the refineries to Bluestar was one of the grounds for a general strike that paralysed the Nigerian economy for four days in June 2007.

    So, while the reversal of the sale is often cited, these days, as a major setback, not everyone agrees with that. Not everyone saw the decision to sell the refineries as the right one. In his interviews with the media on the subject, Baba Obasanjo usually anchors his argument that the refineries can never work on the conversation he said he heard with top Shell executives whom he had invited to take a stake in the refinery and manage it. 

    Shell, he says, gave 4 reasons for declining his offer. According to Baba, the Shell Executive said: ” First of all, they make a major profit from upstream, not from downstream. He said they run downstream just to keep their head above water.

    “Two, our refineries were too small: 60,000 barrels 100,000 barrels and I think 120,000 barrels. He said that at that time, the average refinery was going for 250,000 barrels.

    “Three, he said our refineries were not well maintained. Four, he said that there was too much corruption around the activities of our refineries and they would not want to get involved in that.”

    But looking at these reasons said to have been given by Shell, none of them is novel or suggestive that Shell saw the refineries as beyond redemption, as Baba Obasanjo concluded. Indeed, it is well known that the refinery business is not the most profitable and that upstream is more profitable than downstream. 

    It is easy to understand why Shell, which is not even a player in the Nigerian downstream sector, will not be interested in running a refinery, even with corruption out of consideration. 

    It is ironic that observations made by Shell will make such a lasting impression on Baba Obasanjo that he will shut out any suggestion that does not endorse the impression he formed.

    It is instructive that following years of fits and starts under different administrations, with efforts at ‘turnaround maintenance’ not yielding lasting results, President Muhammadu Buhari who had worked with President Obasanjo in the past, will then take the bold step of shutting down the refineries and commissioned a complete rehabilitation of the 4 Refineries, as different from the TAMs, in 2021. 

    At the time, the NNPCL CEO, Mele Kyari said: “I have said it over and over that we have not taken care of these refineries over the years, that we have mismanaged the turnaround maintenance work over time in the last 20+ years, these plants have degenerated to a level that today, we are not turning around but resuscitating them, which is different from TAM.” 

    Apparently, many didn’t understand the difference then, even as many still don’t understand it now, thus going off tangent in their expectations of what the refineries can deliver. 

    At the time the contract for rehabilitation was awarded, some people had also made the point that a new refinery could have been built instead of rehabilitating the old ones, but Mele Kyari explained then:

    “We have people saying why not build a new one; why will you repair an old refinery with $1.5 billion? The fact is available even by Google search, what it takes to build a refinery of this status today.

    “It will be difficult for the country to build a new refinery as it will take four years for it to commence production. It is around $7 billion and $12 billion to construct a refinery of this nature (Port Harcourt refinery),” Kyari argued.

    Atedo Peterside submitted then that NNPC would only “enmesh Nigeria into a deeper financial mess by throwing $1.5 billion at a problem it created,”, while Prof Pat Utomi argued that “The decision of Federal government to invest $1.5 billion in the repair of Port Harcourt refinery is unwise, unreasonable and has no basis.”

    Indeed, only a few gave the NNPCL a chance with the rehabilitation of the refineries, with trust further eroded by multiple failures to deliver to its schedule. But things have turned around in the last 2 months with the commencement of production in the old wing of the Port Harcourt Refinery, and last week’s resumption of production at the Warri Refinery, with indications that the Kaduna Refinery would be going on stream soon.  The club of cynics and skeptics is fast thinning out.

    Baba Obasanjo appears unconvinced though. “I was told not too long ago that since that time, more than two billion dollars have been squandered on the refineries and they still will not work. If a company like Shell tells me what they told me, I will believe them. But here we are, over $2 billion squandered, and the refineries still won’t work,” Baba Obasanjo declares. It might be that Baba is of the mind that the rehabilitation work that was done at the Refineries is of the standard that was presented to him as having been done in the past, not realising that this is clearly beyond that, with experts positing that what we have now is virtually a new plant. 

    NNPCL has responded appropriately with its Chief Corporate Communications Officer, Olufemi Soneye, extending an invitation to the former President for a tour of the newly completed refineries to witness first-hand the state of operations there.

    President Olusegun Obasanjo has a reputation for being forthright and candid. One expects him to honour this invitation and share with Nigerians his impression thereafter. That is the right and honourable thing to do. 

    – Simbo Olorunfemi works for Hoofbeatdotcom, a Nigerian communications consultancy and publisher of Africa Enterprise.

  • Falana to Obasanjo: Yar’Adua voided refinery sale over conflict of interest

    Falana to Obasanjo: Yar’Adua voided refinery sale over conflict of interest

    Human rights lawyer Femi Falana (SAN) yesterday attributed federal  government’s  cancellation of a Public, Private Partnership (PPP) arrangement for the management of the Port Harcourt, Warri and Kaduna refineries approved by the Obasanjo government in 2007 to the questionable circumstances surrounding the deal.

    Falana, responding to the Thursday statement by ex-President Olusegun Obasanjo on how his successor, the late Umaru Yar Adua, refunded the $750 million paid by a consortium to run the refineries, said the deal lacked transparency.

    The activist, in a statement on behalf of Alliance on Surviving Covid and Beyond (ASCAB), recalled how Obasanjo “in utter breach” of the Privatisation and Commercialisation Act, allegedly sidelined Vice President Atiku Abubakar, who was the Chairman of the National Council on Privatisation (NCP), and “took over the privatisation of a number of public enterprises.”

    The NCP was established to oversee the privatisation and commercialisation of public enterprises

    He said: “On May 17, 2007, President Obasanjo sold a 51% stake in the Port Harcourt refinery to Bluestar Oil for US$561 million. 

    “In another transaction that took place on  May 28, 2007, President Obasanjo sold  51% shares in Kaduna Refinery to Bluestar Oil for $160 million.

    “Bluestar Oil was a consortium of three domestic companies, including Dangote Oil, Zenon Oil and Transcop.

    “Before the deal, President Obasanjo had acquired large shares in Transcorp through ‘blind trust.’

    “Many interest groups in the country questioned the legal validity and moral propriety of the sales as they were consummated in the last days of the Obasanjo administration.

    “The two powerful trade unions in the oil industry —the  National Union of Petroleum and Natural Gas Workers (NUPENG) and the Petroleum and Natural Gas Senior Staff Association of Nigeria (PENGASSAN) kicked against the privatisation of the two refineries on grounds of conflict of interest and lack of due process.

    “They also alleged that the nation had been shortchanged as the shares acquired in the Port Harcourt refinery for $516 million were worth US$5 billion.

    “Convinced that the deals were not in the national interest, both unions proceeded on a 4-day strike that almost paralysed the Nigerian economy in June 2007.

    “The strike was called off based on the assurance of the federal government to the effect that the deals would be fully investigated.

    “Upon the conclusion of the investigation by the federal government, the purported privatisation of the Port Harcourt and Kaduna refineries was cancelled by President Umaru Yar’adua.

    “It is on record that the cancellation of the privatisation was not challenged in any court as it was carried out contrary to the letter and spirit of the Privatisation and Commercialisation Act.”

    The Falana-led alliance alleged a renewed campaign for the privatisation of the nation’s refineries, and asked NUPENG and PENGASSAN to intensify their historical struggle to act as a counterpoise to the campaign .

    “Those who are awaiting the privatisation of the refineries in a manner at variance with the national interest should be advised to set up their own refineries like the Dangote Group,” he said.

    Read Also: NNPCL invites Obasanjo to tour PH, Warri Refineries

    Obasanjo had expressed doubts over the reactivation of the Port Harcourt and Warri refineries by the Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited (NNPC) following years of shutdown.

    He said the NNPCL claims could not be true.

    His words: “So if anybody tells you now that they (the refineries ) are working, why are they not with Aliko (in the market)?

    “And Aliko will make his own refinery work. Not only make it work, he will make it deliver.

    “Whether we announce our own government refineries are working or not working, look, it is like they say in Yoruba adage, ‘the man who plants 100 heaps of yams and says he has planted 200 heaps, they say after he has harvested 100 heaps of yam, he will also harvest 100 heaps of lies,” he said in response to a question on the oil assets.

     “Well, you know what I said about the Port Harcourt refinery? Do you remember?

    “I will remind you. I said when I was president, I wanted to do something about the three refineries we have. Port Harcourt, Warri and Kaduna.

    “And Aliko Dangote got a team after I asked Shell to come and run them for us, and Shell said they wouldn’t.

    “I said please, come and take equity. They said no. All right, don’t take equity, come and run it. They said no. Later on I called them.

    “I called the boss of Shell then. Come and tell me what it is. And he gave me four or five reasons.

    “He said, well, first of all, we make our major profit from upstream, not from downstream. Downstream we run just to keep our head above water.

    “Two, the refineries are too small, 60,000 barrels per day, 100,000 barrels and I think 120,000 barrels. He said at that time, the average refinery was going for 250,000 barrels per day.

    “Three, he said our refineries are not well maintained.

    “Four, he said there was too much corruption around the activities of our refineries and they would not want to get involved in that.

    “And when anybody tells you a thing like that, what will you do? And it was after that that Aliko got a team together and they paid $750 million to take part in PPP, running the refinery. My successor refunded their money.”

    “But I was told not too long ago that since that time, more than $2 billion has been squandered on the refinery and they still will not work.

    “Anybody can tell you. If a company like Shell tells me what they told me, I will believe them.”

    The authorities of NNPCL have invited Obasanjo to come and personally inspect the refineries to see them in operation.

    Chief Corporate Communications Officer of the company, Olufemi Soneye, said the new business model run by NNPCL has helped turn the facilities around.

    He said: “Today, NNPC has evolved into NNPC Limited, a private entity that has transitioned from being a loss-making organisation to becoming a profit-oriented global energy leader.

    “Under this new model, NNPC Limited has expanded beyond oil and gas to become an integrated energy company.

    “Our focus is not only on harnessing traditional resources but also on developing cleaner, cheaper and sustainable energy solutions to meet Nigeria’s growing demands.”

    He described the complete rehabilitation of the Port Harcourt Refining Company and Warri Refinery as a notable achievement by the company, saying that what has been done is not the typical Turnaround Maintenance (TAM) of the past but a comprehensive overhaul designed to meet world-class standards.

    He added: “Similar efforts are underway at the old Port Harcourt Refinery and Kaduna Refinery, ensuring these facilities are enhanced and maintained to global standards for sustainable operation.

    “This progress has been driven by the visionary leadership of the NNPC Limited board and the management team led by GCEO Mele Kyari, alongside President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s transformative policies in the energy sector.

    “Together, they have achieved unprecedented milestones, setting NNPC Limited on a path to redefine energy security for Nigeria while positioning the company as a leader on the global energy stage.

    “We extend an invitation to our esteemed former president to join us in this historic journey.

    “His wisdom and experience are invaluable, and we deeply appreciate his insights and guidance, which will always be welcomed and cherished.

    “Additionally, we warmly invite President Obasanjo to tour the rehabilitated refineries and witness firsthand the progress made under the leadership of NNPC Limited.

    “We remain grateful for his enduring contributions to Nigeria’s development and are committed to building a brighter, more prosperous future for our nation.

    “Together, we can continue to ensure energy security and deliver sustainable value to all Nigerians.”

  • Thoughts and non thoughts of OBJ

    Thoughts and non thoughts of OBJ

    So pungent, incisive, convincing and irrefutable have been the several reactions to former President Olusegun Obasanjo’s recent address at Yale University in the United States in which he not only excoriated the President Bola Ahmed Tinubu administration but, characteristically, held his own leadership record up as the ideal to follow, that there is no need to reiterate the well known arguments here. Sermonizing endlessly on the ills plaguing Nigeria and magisterially pronouncing solutions to them has been the routine pastime of the former military head of state and then elected President for two terms despite the fact that he did not avail himself of his latter day wisdom when he had the opportunity to steer the affairs of Nigeria and shape the destiny of the nation.

    The truth of the matter is that the Owu Chief, perhaps more than any other past leader, cannot escape culpability for the state of Nigeria today – her continued underdevelopment and poverty despite an abundance of natural, mineral and relatively qualitative Human Resources. Had he seized the opportunities placed on his laps seemingly on a golden platter to steer Nigeria’s ship of State particularly between 1999 and 2007 to deepen the country’s federal practice, diversify the economy, lay the foundation for the modernization and expansion of key infrastructure, revamp the country’s security architecture, institutionalize electoral integrity through the conduct of credible polls and pay more than lip service to the fight against corruption, the trajectory of the country’s socioeconomic and political development would be far different from what it is today.

    In his book, ‘Not My Will’, a personal memoir of his years in power as military Head of State between 1976 and 1979, Obasanjo, with characteristic lack of charity, derided the late Chief Obafemi Awolowo asserting that what the legendary politician and statesman had sought in futility all his life, which was to be elected President of Nigeria, he (Obasanjo) had attained at a relatively young age. Yet, he did not address his mind to the critical issue of whether or not he had maximally utilize this opportunity to pursue and promote the best interest of Nigeria and her accelerated developmental transformation. His military regime’s political transition programme ushered in a civilian dispensation in 1979 that was one of the most venal, corrupt and inept leading to the collapse of the Second Republic and the return of military rule within four years. Given another opportunity to redeem himself as elected President of Nigeria from 1999 to 2007, Obasanjo demonstrated that he had learnt nothing from his past foray in power.

    In his address at an event to honour the memory of the great novelist and intellectual, Chinua Achebe, at Yale University, Obasanjo’s unsparing criticism descended heavily on the incumbent Tinubu administration in the same way that he had subjected every government to since his exit from power in 2007. It little occurred to him, as many analysts have pointed out, that the naturally reticent Achebe was forced to trenchantly criticize bad and lawless governance under the Obasanjo presidency and even rejected the national honour bestowed on him by the Ota farmer as a gesture of symbolic protest.

    Some have attributed the former President’s relentless criticisms of successive administrations after him to a desire to be the focus of attention as well as the urge to portray his administration as the best in this dispensation if not in the post-independence history of Nigeria. Unfortunately, any such pretensions fly in the face of indisputable facts and cannot be supported by objective, serious minded analysis. It is my view that the former President’s serial critiques of Nigeria’s political economy under successive administrations and habitual indulgence in self-glorification stem from an innate lack of capacity to transcend superficiality in analysis as evidenced by the ephemerality of most of his books in which he makes magisterial pronouncements that have minimal impact on the polity because they are hardly deeply reasoned and well thought out. This is in sharp contradistinction to the immortal thoughts and works of Awolowo that still remain pertinent and relevant to Nigeria’s quest for a viable socioeconomic and political order decades after they were written.

    Read Also: Shettima champions youth empowerment graduation ceremony

    For instance, Obasanjo loves to flaunt his self-proclaimed patriotism and incomparable love for Nigeria. Yet, from his conduct when he had the opportunity to preside over the country’s affairs, there was no indication that he had reflected deeply on what patriotism really means beyond mere cliches and empty sentimentality. For instance, when a 20-man delegation of the League of Northern Democrats led by a former Governor of Kano State, Ibrahim Shekarau, visited him in Abeokuta recently, the former President reiterated once again his fabled love for Nigeria. In his words, “You said I am a believer in the greatness of this country. Yes, I am. I am also an incurable optimist in this country. I am totally committed to the goodness of this country. But I believe if we look back and we want to be sincere with ourselves, we can see some of the mistakes of the past which we must not fall into again”.

    But it is no less a person than Chinua Achebe who gives us an insight into the shallowness of Obasanjo’s understanding of patriotism and love for country. On page 15 of his slim but powerful classic, ‘The Trouble with Nigeria’, Achebe writes, “In 1978 or 79 General Obasanjo paid an official visit to the University of Nigeria, Nsukka. Of the academic community assembled in the Niger Room of the Continuing Education Centre and which rose respectfully to its feet on his entry, General Obasanjo made a totally unexpected demand. He asked them to recite the national pledge! A few ambiguous mumbles followed, and then stony silence. “You see,” said the General bristling with hostility, “You do not even know the National Pledge”. No doubt he saw in this failure an indictable absence of patriotism among a group he had always held with great suspicion”.

    Achebe then goes on to dilate lucidly on patriotism. His words, “Who is a patriot? He is a person who loves his country. He is not a person who says he loves his country. He is not even a person who shouts or swears or recites or sings his love for his country. He is one who cares deeply about the happiness and well-being of his country and all its people. Patriotism is an emotion of love directed by a critical intelligence. A true patriot will always demand the highest standards of his country and accept nothing but the best for and from his people. He will be outspoken in condemnation of their shortcomings without giving way to superiority, despair or cynicism. That is my idea of a patriot”. It is thus obvious that Obasanjo’s address at Yale and his several scurrilous denunciations of previous administrations both of the PDP and APC fall far short of Achebe’s thoughtful and exacting standards of patriotism.

    In the same address to the League of Northern Democrats, Obasanjo spoke on the vexed issue of Igbo presidency which is yet to be a reality in the country. According to him, “I think all of us in Nigeria have to rethink…It bleeds my heart when people say because the Igbo had carried out a secession and so an Igbo man cannot be the President of Nigeria. I say what nonsense? There is no section of Nigeria that has not planned secession? What is “Araba” in the North? The North planned to break up Nigeria…What is treasonable felony? So, who among us can say I am better than the other? None!”.

    In the first place, it is untrue that there is no part of the country that has not planned a secession. There were certainly tensions in the relationship between various parts of the country leading to threats and heated exchanges at various times which is natural in a complex, plural polity like ours. But it is only the Igbo of the Southeast that had actually carried out the threat of secession, an attempt that was militarily crushed after three years of bloody conflagration. Even then, I am unaware as Obasanjo posits that anybody worth taking seriously has ever suggested that an Igbo man cannot be President of Nigeria because of the abortive secession attempt. Indeed, as I have previously said in this column, within nine years of the end of the civil war, an Igbo man, Dr Alex Ekwueme, had become the Vice President of Nigeria. There is every possibility that within the dynamics of democratic politics an Igbo man would have since become President of Nigeria but for the truncation of democracy by military intervention in 1983.

    In the last presidential election, Mr Peter Obi, directed his campaign mainly at his fellow Igbo as well as Christians of the North and South and his support base was restricted to that limited constituency which cannot deliver a presidential victory in a vast country like Nigeria. A candidate who engaged in church tourism campaigns and openly called on Christians to “take back your country” understandably did not win a single state in the core Muslim North which constitutes at least one half of the electorate. In any case, if Obasanjo is so passionate about Igbo presidency, why did he emerge from nowhere to snatch the PDP presidential ticket from Dr Ekwueme in 1998 with the support of retired northern Generals even when Ekwueme, one of the founding fathers of the PDP, was on course to winning the ticket?

    Reporting Obasanjo’s address to the visiting League of Northern Democrats, The Punch newspaper wrote, “The former President blamed regionalism as practiced before obtaining independence in October 1960 as the foundation of the country’s prolonged lack of cohesion, adding that “the truth is that at independence, Nigeria emerged with three leaders and so it is a situation of three countries in one ever since”. Again, it does not appear that this submission is a reflection of rigorous thought.

    For one, it is simplistic to base an analysis of post-independence Nigerian politics on the three major ethnic groups when ethnic minorities have increasingly asserted their influence within the polity. Again, it is as misleading to blame the regional structure of the first republic for the collapse of democracy in 1966 just as it is to proffer a return to regionalism as the solution to current challenges. Rather than regionalism per se being the problem with the First Republic, it was the attempt by the ruling NPC/NCNC coalition at the centre to forcibly seize control of the Western Region from the Action Group (AG) and impose an unpopular Ladoke Akintola of the NNDP on the region through the brazen massive rigging of the 1965 Western Regional elections that ignited the flames of anarchy in the region which then had national implications bringing down the democratic edifice on everybody.

    Obasanjo lectured his northern visitors to the effect that “Yes, you have identified your group as the League of Northern Democrats, but how I wish you had called your group National League of Democrats, because where you come from should not be a problem. Where I was born should not be the enemy of my ‘Nigerianess’. I will be increasing by being a Nigerian rather than being a member of the Republic of Oodua”. This is hardly realistic. When asked to respond to allegations that he was a tribalist during his campaign for the presidency in 1979, Chief Awolowo submitted that he could not be a good Yoruba man without first and foremost being a good and responsible indigene of Ikenne and that he could not claim to be a good and patriotic Nigerian without first being a good and responsible Yoruba man. This sounds eminently sensible, practical and honest to me. The point, as the Premier of the Northern Region, Sir Ahmadu Bello, was said to have told the great Zik is not to deny our differences but to understand them.

    • This article was first published November 13, 2024

  • Obasanjo’s habitual Gaffe

    Obasanjo’s habitual Gaffe

    “Conscience is an open wound. Only the truth can heal it”. Usman Dan Fodio

    Preamble

    Nothing can be strange in the contemporary world. Whatever is happening in any part of the world today must have happened severally in the past. History is a testimony to this assertion.

    A Moment of Brouhaha

    It was another moment of mischievous brouhaha in Nigeria when the media waves throbbed with the news of a ridiculous mischief by a former Nigerian President, Chief Mathew AremuOlusegunOkikiolakanObasanjo. He was reported to have said that the current Nigerian federal government, led by President MuhammaduBuhari, was championing what he called ‘Fulanization’ of Africa and ‘Islamization’ of West Africa. Ordinarily, such an inconsequential inflammatory statementshould not have been of any concern to ‘The Message’ column. But as a watchful Islamic column, the word ‘Islamization’ which is a coinage of Nigerian Christian media could not have passed by it without critical notice. That sour tasted word shamelessly coated in monotony coming from a man who parades himself as a Statesman could only have surprised those who did not know Obasanjo closely. Here is a man who does not concern himself with anything that is not of personal interest to him. Each time he talks embarrassingly in public, his ignorant disciples only jump to the stage in his defence without knowing his hidden agenda.

    Whenever           Obasanjo is imprisoned by his own conscience, the tendency is for him to look for an escape route by all means. That is the situation in which this onetime Nigerian Army Generalfrom Ogun State, Chief Mathew Aremu Olusegun Okikiolakan Obasanjo,who once fortuitously became Nigeria’s military Head of State by sheer opportunistic providence, now finds himself. Twenty years after this man exited from office as a military Head of State, he was again propelled by the same providence from the status of a prisoner to that of an elected President. Although his two terms of eight years of rule as President added no meaningful value of reverence to Nigeria’s democracy and progress, he still keeps gallivanting around today in a vainglorious euphoria of a former President and Statesman despite his  vain octogenarian age. Because of this man’s political shenanigans, any mention of his name serves as a reminder of letter writing. He is eminently qualified as Africa’s Letter Writer-in-Chief. 

    However, what most observers of this restive but evidently jittery man seem not to notice is a conspicuous but mysterious finger   behind which he is struggling to hide in his desperation to dodge official accountability forhis period of ruling Nigeria particularly thealleged sum of $16 billion earmarked for national electricity during his regime.

    Read Also: 133 Nigerian women, girls killed in 2024 due to Gender-Based Violence – Report

    The President then, Muhammadu Buhari, alluded to that loot when he lamented the reason for Nigeria’s non- functional electricity. That querulous lamentation has since become a spectra chasing Obasanjo’s ghost days and nights and preventing him from sleeping with both eyes closed. As a former President, he knows the implications of Buhari’s lamentation on that money and he has been running helter skelter to prevent or delay an official query on it. Thus, he would rather instigate a national war to prevent a public investigation than wait to be caught in the cobweb of a possible landmark corruption by an institution which he set up to fight that Nigeria’s most abominable epidemics. And having lost out in the political arena where his satanic ‘Third Force’ party has proved to be a woeful failure, the only remaining weapon with which to fight a preemptive waragainst the ruling government is religion. His probably believes that by instigating a religious strife he may get some troops to queue up behind him as mercenary sectarian archers. That was why he had to use a Church as avenue for making an inflammable religious statement of provocation in an attempt to ignite a furnace of religious war by alleging a baseless ‘Fulanization’ of Africa and ‘Islamization’ of West Africa as a Nigerian government agenda under Buhari regime.

    This self-crowned African foremost Statesman has not seen countries in the West African sub-region where Christians

    Before and After

    Before Obasanjo, there had been military rulers in Nigeria. We can still remember General Yakubu Gowon, General Ibrahim Babagida and General Abdul Salami Abubakar all of whom are still very much alive as statesmen. And after Obasanjo’s forceful exit from the Presidency, there has been an elected President who is still alive as an ex-officio. His name is Dr. GoodluckEbele Jonathan. None of these gentlemen has thrown dignity to the winds as Obasanjo has been doing even to the embarrassment of his family.

    The thought of ‘fulanization’ and ‘islamization’ by him as a blackmail strategy to escape the web of corruption is not only parochial it is also childishly naïve. Only disciples of the Lucifer can stupidly go to an open market with such a product with the aim of selling it for fee. Nigerians of today have grown beyond such a crawling level in reasoning.

    Mathew Kuka’s Warning

    One of Nigeria’s most vocal persons on religious matters in the country is Ref. Father Mathew Kuka. As a frontline Catholic Bishop and a strong member of Nigerian Interreligious Council (NIREC), this man who shares the same Christian name (Mathew) with Obasanjo had long foreseen the tendency in certain opportunistic Nigerian elements to use Boko Haram as a cover for their satanic atrocities and he had vehemently warned against it.