Tag: Obasanjo

  • I’m ready to intervene to bring  back the girls, says Obasanjo

    I’m ready to intervene to bring back the girls, says Obasanjo

    Former President Olusegun Obasanjo yesterday confirmed his intervention in the abduction of the Chibok school girls.

    He however said he cannot wade in unless he gets the green light from President Goodluck Jonathan. He spoke in an interview aired last night on Channels television.

    Kaduna-based human rights activist Shehu Sani during the week confirmed that he attended a meeting convened by the ex-President inAbeokuta.

    Obasanjo told Channels he was “surprised at how certain meetings have turned out”.

    “I cannot have a plan without the Presidency being involved”, he added, debunking claims that he was “going on a one man mission”. He insisted that it would be “idiotic” for him to have done so.

    He noted that he was beaten by Sani to letting the state and national authorities know the meeting had taken place and admitted that he owed the government an apology

     “I have to involve the President and he also tells me this is what we are doing or this is what we are pursuing either in addition or along with what we are doing or not,” he said.

    On the allegation that the abduction of the girls was orchestrated to bring down the President Goodluck Jonathan’s government Obasanjo said: “If the Presidency is obsessed with one thing and one thing only and any other thing of concern to Nigeria is secondary, then the Presidency will take that position” which he said “will be unfortunate”.

    Obasanjo said “Boko Haram (sect) has been in existence for years…they didn’t disturb my government because when I was in government I did not disturb their Sharia.” He declared: “Sharia is part of our constitution.”

    Speaking on the statement by Chief of Defence Staff Air Marshal Alex Bardeh that  where the abducted girls are being kept had been found, Obasanjo urged the military not to engage in public relations stunts with the issue.

    He said:”This is not an issue that you will play Public Relations propaganda with. It is a serious issue that is like a spear in the heart of the parents and whatever statement we make and action we take, if it will not really deal with the issue in a way that will bring those girls out safe and secure and make their families happy and will also give every Nigerian a sense of security, then such statements should not be made.”.

    He added that the American forces have the means to confirm or debunk the statement made by the CDS but remarked, “I will be pleasantly surprised if those girls are returned intact.”

  • Why Obasanjo met Boko Haram members’ families – Shehu Sani

    Civil Rights activist, Mallam Shehu Sani, said in Kaduna Wednesday that he led a delegation of some families of suspected Boko Haram members to a meeting with former President Olusegun Obasanjo to find ways of securing the release of the abducted schoolgirls.

    Sani said in a statement made available to The Nation that the meeting which took place at the Abeokuta residence of the former President was aimed at opening a new channel of dialogue with leaders of the sect and secure the release of the missing girls.

    He expressed the hope that the meeting will lead to a genuine dialogue between the abductors and the federal government on how to secure the girls’ release.

    He said, “My statement is in response to the reports and the enquiries on the Abeokuta meeting with the former president Olusegun Obasanjo and some family members of the Boko Haram group. The renewed effort to dialogue with the leaders of Boko Haram is being pursued with vigour.

    “This is to confirm that the meeting actually took place and I was part of it. The meeting was solely aimed at exploring the possibility of opening a new channel for dialogue or negotiation with the sect members towards securing the release of the abducted Chibok girls held in captivity for over a month.”

    He noted that the meeting between the former President and families of Boko Haram members appraised the reportedly collapsed back door deal that was later cancelled by the Government.

    “I wish to also confirm that the report of the intervention of Mr. Salkida in negotiating the release of the Chibok girls is credible.

    “I personally introduced Salkida to the government and spoke about him in many of my previous interviews. He has tried his best in the past and of recent to help in resolving the insurgency through dialogue but was on all occasions frustrated by the government.

    “Mr. Salkida should not be vilified but should be appreciated. Mr. Salkida’s attempt could have actually see to the release of the abducted girls. The meeting in Abeokuta was aimed at repackaging and salvaging the dialogue option. It was generally agreed that the initiative cannot take off without the consent of the Federal Government. It’s significant for Nigerians to note that negotiation is the only safer option to get the girls back home,” Sani stated.

     

  • Honour for Obasanjo, Kuffour, Tambuwal, others

    Honour for Obasanjo, Kuffour, Tambuwal, others

    FORMER President Olusegun Obasanjo and his onetime Ghanaian counterpart, Mr. John Kuffour have been listed for recognition at the Annual Leadership Award for African Achievers. The event which will hold on Sunday June 1, 2014, at the Balmoral Event Center, Oregun, Ikeja, Lagos is the brainchild of Celebrity International Limited, publishers of Celebrity magazine. Other notable Nigerians listed for recognition are the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Rt Hon Aminu Tambuwal, Governors Rotimi Amaechi (Rivers State), Rauf Aregbesola (State of Osun), Rochas Okorocha (Imo) and Babatunde Fashola ( Lagos).

  • Jonathan overwhelmed by Boko Haram  – Obasanjo

    Jonathan overwhelmed by Boko Haram – Obasanjo

    Former President Olusegun Obasanjo on Wednesday said President Goodluck Jonathan is overwhelmed by the Boko Haram insurgency.

    The former president, who spoke in Nairobi, Kenya, said he took it upon himself in 2011 to go on a fact finding mission when the insurgency became uncontrollable to see how to mediate.

    “I met people especially families who knew them. I wanted to find out if it was an organization which has aims and objectives and if they have a foreign backing,” he stated.

    He said the group has leaders, adding that there was somebody who acted in proxy as a lawyer to the sect.

    “The lawyer who was acting in proxy told me that Mr. President if you want to meet their leaders give me three hours. I will gather their leaders, not in Nigeria but outside Nigeria. Obviously they have leaders,” Obasanjo said.

    When asked if carrot and stick approach will work in dealing with the sect, he said: “Well, if you had tried stick and stick alone and has not worked, is there anything wrong to try something along with the stick?

    “I doubt it very much if you will consider that as wrong because in your introductory statement in this programme, you made the point that no matter how well meaning the President might have been his assertion that he will be on top of Boko Haram has not been achieved,” the former president said rhetorically.

    Human rights activist, Shehu Sanni, said Boko Haram is a sect that has a theocratic agenda.

    Sanni said the sect is unlike others in the north, adding: “There are sects in the north that say Nigeria should adopt Islam but they are not as fundamental.”

    He said the use of force has not been able to yield any result.

    He cautioned the Federal Government to get the girls out first before using force to subdue the sect.

  • Lamido competent to rule Nigeria – Obasanjo

    Lamido competent to rule Nigeria – Obasanjo

    Former President Olusegun Obasanjo on Monday said Jigawa State Governor, Sule Lamido, is competent to rule the country in 2015.

    The former president made the disclosure while answering questions from journalists during his one- day official visit to the state.

    He said Lamido’s background makes him competent to rule the country.

    “Going by Lamido’s background, performance and credibility, his competent and exposure, he can stand shoulder to shoulder with anybody in the country,” Obasanjo said.

    He continued: “if it is the wish of the people, it is okay. He did not tell me he is vying for the post, but being the wish of the people let’s wait and see.”

    “Based on his tracking his record would you say he is not competent?, He is competent, he can stand shoulder to shoulder with anyone in this nation.

    “Our hope is to produce future leaders who would grow up with one Nigeria in their mind. I mean those who are committed and patriotic.”

     

  • Comment

    Comment

    For Dare Olatunji

    Mr Tunji, what an article on former President Obasanjo, you made my day. “Obasanjo has changed” is a study case for our university dons. From Dr Jide Akinyemi, Ikole Ekiti

    On former President Obasanjo and his latest sartorial tastes, you’re spot-on. That piece would’ve been incomplete without that amiable lady, Bola. I had a personal encounter with her sometime ago when I went visiting Baba at his hilltop mansion with some clients. She was so hospitable that she insisted we take lunch while waiting for our turn to see the ex-president. And while she was at it, she did her duty without airs. A woman manifesting such nobility of character can go to any length to groom her man. Afterall, in this day and age, image seems to be everything. From Abayomi Adeniji, Esq.

    There is a new Obasanjo in town refers: Dear Olatunji Dare, by this adoption of your once-villified former President Obasanjo as your sartorial godfather and model, no one who enjoys THE NATION shall claim ignorance that Obasanjo’s sins have been forgiven. For the first time in his long life, the western press will rise to give him an excellent press. Welcome Obasanjo to APC. From Barrister Chima, Owerri

    I liked your article on former Predident Obasanjo. Your observation is right. Obasanjo is a man and leader that cannot be ignored, whether good or bad. Well done! From Dr. Adeagbo

    Being given to sartorial inelegance, I found your Tuesday, March 25 piece on former President Obasanjo’s new-found trendiness so compelling that I now wish to ‘transform’ my wardrobe as well. The piece was rich in subtle wit and humour, with a sprinkling of some prickly remarks for good measure. I have decided to make it my literary companion for a while. A masterpiece! From Bassey Itam Asuquo, Calabar

    Mr Dare, that was a funny but factual one on Obasanjo. His less-caring attitude towards his grooming in the past must have been because he was in military outfit most of his life. So, to him, what was prime in grooming was covering up what part should not be exposed of the body. And that was in tandem with his attitude of calling a spade what it is and nothing else on any issue; whatever it might be. The sudden change in his dressing mode could be linked to his wife’s influence. And, for a man of Obasanjo’s clout, it would take a strong willed, persuasive and respectful woman to influence a strong willed personality like Obasanjo. Apart from that, Obasanjo’s can of responsibilities has reduced drastically to accommodate such a “trivial” change; to atleast make “mama” happy and proud of him. Or could his caving in to “Mama’s” plea be linked to vegetable soup; as some would figure? Laugh! From Lai Ashadele

    Re-”There is a new Obasanjo-OBJ- in town”. “When someone is attaining the growth age, he fights a battle with cleverness and tactics”. If Obasanjo in recent time had receded into his shell, he knows what he’s watching, hence, his retreat! Obasanjo loves Nigeria’s unity and always wanted to contribute to topical issues that will to growth! On his new dressing mode, Obasanjo needs that because when one labours all the years, changing wardrobe is not a crime. But, I guess, Madam Bola OBJ does a good job. From Lanre Oseni.

    Baba is truely the best Nigerian and still believes in one Nigeria. Nobody will like to demolish a house he has suffered to build. I only pity Baba because he deserves more than what he’s geting. His critics were not fair to him. Where were they when Nigeria was on fire? How many of them think of Nigeria, not to talk of Africa? It’s high time Baba enjoyed the fruits of his labour, I wish him long life; salute to a rare General. From Lawal Rasheed, Ibadan.

     

    For Tunji Adegbaoyega

    Re: ‘Dem say, dem say governor’, (your column of March 31). A wonderful article as usual. But Tunji, one governor you have failed to add is the Akwa Ibom State Governor, Godswill Akpabio (although a performer unlike his colleague). From Dapo Lagos.

    Governor Dickson is working hard to carry everybody along to move Bayelsa forward, despite that some appointments made by the governor were unnecessary. From Gordon Chika Nnorom, Umukabia, Abia State.

    I know that no matter the punishment that the Seriake Dickson’s committee on rumour mongering may plan for the perceived offenders, the judiciary/courts will serve as redeemers for the same perceived offenders. This is a democracy. How will there not be ‘dem say, dem say’ where a First Lady was dashed the position of permanent secretary whereas she ought to have earned it! Dem say, dem say will continue where the same free-funded permanent secretary would not do the work! Dem say people want to know the practicability of permanent secretary who is eating without working! Dem say people, ride on o jare. Also, concerning your “Mr President remember January 2012”, I think Mr President was just sensitising Nigerians on what he has for us, and what suggestions we have to move Nigeria forward on the proposed fuel price hike. We are all glad that you reminded the President of January 2012 because ‘a word is enough for the wise’. We are all too sure that the era of fuel price increase is gone. Rather, we want to see the end of the fuel subsidy scam. From Lanre Oseni.

    Tunji, thank you for yet another good outing on March 17 titled: “Mr President, remember January 2.” It may interest you to know that NNPC is the reason our refineries may not work even at 50 per cent capacity! Government is using it as a conduit pipe. Anonymous

    I agree with you that Nigerians are not ready for high fuel prices. I ask: which class of Nigerians? The exploited, yes! Well, the whole truth is that the existing social system is based on exploitation. What is more, the exploited have the right to build a government of their choice. Thanks. From Amos Ejimonye, Kaduna.

    They have started oiling and assembling their rigging machinery. Very soon, they will begin to visit governors, chiefs, emirs with money in the name of consultations for 2015. The money is raised through phoney contracts, oil blocs, fuel subsidy, tax and import waivers awarded to some characters in the rigging machinery. That is where real rigging starts. I urge you editors (NGE) and journalists generally to remember how you people fought Gen. Abacha. Do the same to the PDP government’s misrule. Nigerians are ready to join in the fight; all we need is leadership and direction from the professionals, civil society groups and labour. From N. Ndubuisi.

    Tunji, you wrote well, your pen will never dry in Jesus’ name (Amen). Where is the SURE-P money to cushion the oil subsidy withdrawal? Nigerians are not feeling the impact of the so-called SURE-P funds. What went wrong? Time will tell. From Chika Nnorom.

  • An eye for an eye will make Nigeria go blind – Atiku

    An eye for an eye will make Nigeria go blind – Atiku

    Former Vice President Atiku Abubakar has welcomed the olive branch extended to him by former President Olusegun Obasanjo and urged Nigerians to imbibe the spirit of forgiveness in the interest of national unity.

    In a statement issued by his media office in Abuja Monday, Atiku said ‘’forgiveness is divinely inspired and is an oil that lubricates the wheels of continued human interactions and engagements.”

    The former Vice President commended Obasanjo, his “former boss for taking this bold and Godly step in the interest of the nation and humanity.’’

    According to Atiku, the process of national healing and reconciliation should advance to a new level and extend to other citizens of our great nation, who may have had grievances against one another.

    He urged politicians to learn from the words of Mahatma Ghandi that an eye for an eye will make our nation go blind.

    “When I made a similar effort few years ago, it was on the conviction that it would not be beneficial to me before Allah, if I went to the grave with bitterness. Let us forgive one another so that we can team up for national rebirth,’’ Atiku urged Nigerians.

    He maintained that even if one disagrees with Obasanjo, no one would doubt his firm commitment to the unity of Nigeria.

  • The new Obasanjo (OBJ)

    The new Obasanjo (OBJ)

    There is a new Obasanjo (OBJ) in town.

    Don’t get me wrong. As far as I know, the former military Head of State and two-term elected President has not sired another offspring lately in or outside the curriculum. To be sure, his born-againism is not all encompassing, as he once, with a mirthful wink, cautioned a friend who expressed surprise that he had not reined in his roving eye. But, to be fair to OBJ, he has been minding his own business.

    If you can get close enough to ask how he is doing, he is unlikely to respond, “I dey like I no dey.” On a good day, he will rejoin rather expansively, “I dey kampe.” On a different kind of day, he will still give the same response, but perhaps with a hint of impatience. But all in all, what you will get is the unvarnished OBJ.

    Much to the relief of Aso Rock, he may not have fired off any missives lately. But that doesn’t mean that he has given up that line of penmanship entirely. Get him worked up, and you will get a dose of what he gave President Goodluck Jonathan the other day.

    Meanwhile, even as he rests that bracing pen, he has found other ways of registering his disdain. He never misses an opportunity to excoriate a certain person in high public office whose solemn word, given not once but twice, counts for nothing. The OBJ who is as blunt as a punch to the nose has not changed a whit.

    He rarely introduces himself these days in a self-deprecatory tone as a chicken farmer. Nor are you likely to find him holding court at his sprawling Ota Farm. But he still takes great pride in farming.

    True, he has stayed away from leadership selection and recruitment in the PDP. Having single-handedly made and un-made six party chairmen, he has earned his rest. Still whenever he sneezes, they catch cold at Wadata Plaza, all the way to Aso Rock. So, this is not about OBJ without clout.

    Nor has there been any indication of a change in his approach to conflict resolution. At one point, the chimurenga, or war of resistance, against the racist white minority regime, was not going well because of personality and ideological differences between the two protagonists, Robert Mugabe and Joshua Nkomo. This conflict stood in the way of the support that Obasanjo was eager to provide, in keeping with Nigeria’s Afrocentric foreign policy.

    So, the story goes, Obasanjo invited them to Lagos, put them in a room, gave each of them a loaded pistol and said he would be back in 30 minutes to embrace whoever survives the shootout and mobilise Nigeria’s support behind him. Whereupon, he locked the door and departed.

    Thus was born the uneasy collaboration between Mugabe and Nkomo that led to the Lancaster House talks, and ultimately to Zimbabwe’s independence.

    Obasanjo has not changed to the point that you could count on him not to try that formula or a variation thereof between Salva Kiir Mayardit and his estranged vice president Riek Machar during his coming assignment as Africa Union Mediator in the South Sudan conflict.

    Nor is there any indication that the new OBJ will flinch from giving any person the Savimbi treatment if that is what the situation calls for. Savimbi, you will recall, was until his death in combat the leader of the South Africa-backed rebel UNITA army in Angola. I will never forget how, at a chance meeting over lunch with Togolese President Gnasssingbe Eyadema in Lomé, Obasanjo rounded on him.

    “Jonas,” Obasanjo said, calling the guerrilla chieftain by his first name, “I proceed from the principle that my enemy’s friend is my enemy. South Africa is Africa’s enemy. You are South Africa’s friend. Therefore, you are Africa’s enemy.”

    That Obasanjo is alive and well.

    What then does Obasanjo’s newness consist in?

    The newness is to be found in his wardrobe. To finally come right out with it, I am here calling attention to the new, sartorially improved Obasanjo.

    Time was when he went all over the place in nondescript clothes that seemed to have been made by a journeyman carpenter. Never crumpled, to be sure, but seldom remarkable. He would never have won a prize for excellent grooming even if he was the only candidate.

    That is no hyperbole, believe me. I was myself once sole candidate several decades ago for a technical position at a Lagos brewery, and had been assured that the job was mine for the taking. The interview was a formality, conducted to fulfill all righteousness. Yet I did not get the job.

    To return to Obasanjo: He cared passionately about policy and programmes and national unity and how to make Nigeria great, and still does. But about his tailoring, his personal grooming, he did not give a damn. Not even the stylish and delectable Stella Obasanjo, of fond memory, could move him to mend his unprepossessing tailoring.

    And he expected his children to be just as indifferent to matters sartorial. He was genuinely surprised that I was not scandalised when he told me of how one of his young sons had asked him in the time of structural adjustment for all of N25 to buy just a pair of underpants. “On what waist was he going to wear such finery?” he asked in astonishment.

    He was even more astonished when I told him that his son was probably settling for the cheapest stuff in the market and that the young man would be lucky it held together for three months.

    Today, going by his official age of 77years, Obasanjo has got rank among be the best-groomed men of his generation. If you add five years to that official age, as I have reason to do, you would have to bracket him with the venerable pioneer merchant banker Otunba Subomi Balogun and the senior attorney Lateef Olufemi Okunnu as leading exemplars of sartorial elegance in the ranks of the nation’s octogenarians.

    These days, you have to look very closely not to mistake Obasanjo for the younger, unfailingly dapper Aremo Olusegun Osoba. Gone from his wardrobe for the most part are the colourful adire ensembles with the perfunctory embroidery, the nondescript cap that sat jauntily on his head, and the reading glasses that seem to have been purchased from a street vendor at Anthony Bus Stop in Lagos.

    Now, you are more likely to see him decked out in fetching, made-to-measure, tastefully embroidered ensembles cut from the finest fabrics, matching caps that have character and designer eye-wear, all colour-coordinated to produce a visual delight. Everything about the new OBJ bespeaks superior grooming

    Look no farther than any of his recent pictures for the new, sartorially improved OBJ. See how he stands out resplendent in all his new elegance in the picture of former heads of state as they were being presented with the Nigeria Centenary Medal in Abuja the other day.

    The credit for this stunning turn-around belongs unquestionably to his consort Bola, herself a lady of great chic. How did she get Obasanjo who never gave a damn about such matters to submit to her Transformation Agenda?

     

  • Referendum, not National Conference

    Referendum, not National Conference

    One of the most disturbing aspects of the just inaugurated National Conference is the very manner in which it was constituted.  The selection and composition of delegates to the conference makes one wonder whether there is some truth in the commonly expressed theory that Nigeria is afflicted with a malaise so serious that no amount of wise leadership can bring the nation to its senses.

    The clamour for a National Conference stems from the realisation that it is about time that the people of this country take control of their own destiny and use the power of democracy to resolve the many pressing problems that afflict their daily lives.  The usurpation or denial of people’s rights in Nigeria has gone on for too long.  The Independence Constitution was the product of the departing colonial authorities.  The 1963 Republic Constitution was decided upon entirely by the Prime Minister and regional premiers of the day who merely amended the 1960 Constitution to make it conform to Republican status.  The 1966 coup usurped democracy by replacing it with military rule.  The 1979 Constitution was a missed opportunity for the people to adopt a constitution for themselves, when the Obasanjo led Military Government amended several aspects of the elected Constituent Assembly’s deliberations and of course our existing 1999 Constitution came into existence as a result of a Decree enacted by the Federal Military Government.   The National Conference is yet another missed opportunity for the Nigerian people to prepare their own Constitution.

    When a frame of government has been established, and a group of rulers elected to govern under it, the right to change the system under a new order or Constitution remains always with the people, just like the right to choose the rulers.  It is an usurpation of powers for any government to assume to exercise that right, without a specific mandate from the people.  My argument therefore is that since we already have a system of government in place, it would be unconstitutional for a National Conference to attempt to usurp the Constitution without first receiving a clear mandate from the electorate the source and donor of all political power.  If the government and its organs are created by the 1999 Constitution, then it is logical that they can only have the power that is granted to them by the instrument from which they derive their existence. The National Assembly or the President have no specific or inherent power to convene a National Conference in order to change or prepare a new Constitution for the electorate neither can they alter the Constitution without first obtaining the support by resolution of at least 2/3 of the Houses of Assembly of the 36 states of the federation.  That being the case, the electorate should have been given the right of direct consultation to convene a National Conference and prepare a new Constitution.  A referendum in my view is the only democratic instrument that can give the National Assembly or the President the mandate to convene a National Conference to change our existing order or Constitution.

    It is a mystery that no one has yet sued the federal government for initiating or attempting to initiate a national conference without first receiving a clear mandate from the people.

    How much we miss the likes of the late legal luminary Chief Gani Fawehinmi. If he were alive, he would have surely taken the federal government on.

    According to foremost constitutional lawyer Professor Ben Nwabueze (SAN) in his book “The Presidential Constitution of Nigeria”, a Constitution is an act of the people if it is made by them either directly in a referendum or  through a convention or constituent assembly popularly elected for this purpose, subject or not to formal ratification by the people in a referendum.

    This definition highlights yet another flaw in the National Conference.  Apart from the fact that the delegates were not popularly elected, how can the deliberations of the conference ever be actualised or brought into effect?  If for instance the delegates at the conference recommend that our system of government should change from Presidential to Parliamentary or perhaps suggest that we begin to operate on a regional basis, can such fundamental changes ever be brought about by a constitutional amendment?  Surely our constitution will have to be jettisoned if such fundamental changes were to be brought about.  It is for these reasons that the above issues have been labeled as forbidden areas of debate at the National Conference.   The National Assembly may be continually empowered to amend the constitution, but it does not possess the power to dispense with it.  In any case, would the National Assembly agree to subject such deliberations to a referendum at the end of the conference when it is quite obvious that if they do so their own position as legislators would be threatened?    In any case subjecting the deliberations of the National Conference to a referendum at the end of the exercise would be like asking the electorate to choose between the devil and the deep blue sea.  After all what would happen if the electorate is dissatisfied with the outcome of the conference in much the same way as they are disillusioned with the 1999 Constitution and our present structure/arrangement?  It would mean that the electorate would be left with no choice at all.

    This is why we ought to have conducted a referendum on this important issue at the beginning.  A referendum at the onset would have determined what “We the people of the Federal Republic of Nigeria” really want.  A referendum would have served as a barometer indicative of what various sections of the country want.  So far, only perceived leaders of thought (not necessarily representative of the people and the various ethnic groups) have given their views on this issue.  Nigeria we know is made up of more than 250 ethnic groups on the average.  If we take about 50 of them to deliberate upon issues at a National Conference would this be fair?  If you Google the official statistics on the composition of Nigeria you will find that those Nigerians aged between 1–14 make up roughly 43.9% of the population.  Those between 15–24 make up 19.3% while those between 25-54 make up a total of roughly 30%.  In total Nigerians between the ages of 1-54 make up about 83% of the population yet how many of these Nigerians in the above age brackets will be participating at the National Conference also bearing in mind that the parents of the Nigerian child aged between 1-14 which makes up 43.9% of the population are likely to fall within the 25-54 age bracket.   Power must be given back to these people by enabling them to exercise responsibility for their own affairs.  A simple question asking whether or not we want to re-write our constitution and/or re-structure our polity would easily have sufficed.

    Thereafter, if the yes votes carry the day, the National Assembly would have been mandated to pass a bill to constitute a National Conference or organise elections into a Constituent Assembly for this purpose as the case may be.  Most importantly a referendum would have done away with the government’s claim to sovereignty if the electorate had voted yes.  Referendums as democratic instruments are readily available all over the world and are a common model in most democratic countries.  They serve as a form of direct democracy.  Countries in the European Union for example are making effective use of these instruments to ratify the E.U. Constitution.  Likewise Britain our former colonial rulers will be conducting a referendum later this year to ascertain whether or not Scotland wants to continue to remain part of the United Kingdom.   There is no particular reason why Nigeria should be any different in its own endeavors.  Bearing in mind that we have a general election next year February, would it not have been far more convenient for us as a nation to place the referendum question next to the Presidential ballot box so that we can vote for both the presidential election and the referendum at the same time?  Would it not be a good form of debate leading up to the Presidential election in the country in 2015?

    •Kola-Balogun, is Commissioner for Youth, Sports and Special Needs, State of Osun.

     

  • Opposition can’t deny Amosun’s achievements, says Obasanjo

    Opposition can’t deny Amosun’s achievements, says Obasanjo

    Former President Olusegun Obasanjo has said the achievements of the Ogun State Governor Ibikunle Amosun administration cannot be denied by the opposition.

    Obasanjo said although assessment of public office holders is better done when they are out power, he would “stick out” his neck to appraise Amosun now.

    The former chairman of the Peoples Democratic Party’s (PDP’s) Board of Trustees spoke in Abeokuta on Tuesday at his 77th birthday celebration at the Olusegun Obasanjo Presidential Library (OOPL).

    He said: “I do not like to talk about politicians when they are still in power. It is only when politicians are out of power that you can assess them accurately. But for this one, I will stick out my neck a little bit. “Those of you who are here in Ogun State will testify. Even if you belong to a party that does not like the governor, you can say I did not lie. I thank you for what you are doing for us.”

    Amosun, who was at the event, described Obasanjo as “a leader whose love for the continued progress, unity and survival of Nigeria is second to none.”