Tag: Obasanjo

  • FCT women criticise Obasanjo’s letter to Jonathan

    FCT women criticise Obasanjo’s letter to Jonathan

    Women in the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) under the auspices of Women Solidarity Group have condemned the letter written by former President Olusegun Obasanjo to President Goodluck Jonathan.

    The National Cordinator of the group, Mrs Rita Audu, who staged a protest walk around major areas of the FCT said that the letter was not the kind of fatherly advice that Nigerians expected from the former President, saying that he should unite the country, instead of inciting the public against the present administration.

    Audu said the protest walk was a move to let former President Olusegun Obasanjo that if all the past leaders had being 100 percent perfect, just the way they want Jonathan to be, Nigeria would have been a better place and there will not be problems anywhere.

    “We want constructive criticism in Nigeria, so that there will be peace every where, there is no reason for people to heat up the polity with such controversial letter. We would like to say that President Jonathan administration is doing everything to affect positively the lives of people in the FCT and entire Nigeria.

    “If you move round the FCT, you will notice the roads networks every where and when you travel out of Abuja, you will see road networks outside. It is an evidence that President Jonathan is doing his best in terms of providing infrastructural development. We are not campaigning for him, but he has also done well in the area of education and creating jobs for graduates.

    “If the past leaders had done everything that Obasanjo wants Jonathan to do, we will not have problems of corruption in Nigeria today. Jonathan is trying to touch what past administrations have failed to touch to affect lives. I believe that with the present step he has taken on power, very soon electricity will be stable.

    “We can see him balancing the economy of Nigeria that has accumulated for long. We are in support of him to lead Nigeria for eight years. I urge every woman in the FCT and Nigeria to support him to contest for second term in office,” he said.

  • Obasanjo to Jonathan: I stand by contents of my letter

    Obasanjo to Jonathan: I stand by contents of my letter

    Former president Olusegun Obasanjo on Monday said he would not give more details on the letter he sent to President Goodluck Jonathan few days ago.

    Obasanjo, in a statement issued by his Special Assistant on Media, Tunde Oladunjoye, said it is no longer necessary to dwell on the content of the letter.

    The former president, however, stated that he stood by everything he wrote in the letter.

    The statement reads:

    “Since the publication of the letter written by the President, Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, Dr. Goodluck Ebele Jonathan, GCFR, which was in response to the letter earlier written by revered former President, Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, Chief Olusegun Obasanjo, GCFR; we have received several requests from local and international media asking to know Chief Obasanjo’s reaction to Mr. President’s response.

    “One, Chief Olusegun Obasanjo, GCFR, acknowledges Mr. President’s letter/response. However, Baba, as he already indicated in his December 2, 2013, does not wish to make further comments beyond the contents of his last letter to the Mr. President or react to the said letter/response from Dr. Goodluck Ebele Jonathan. Let me quote from page fourteen, paragraph two of Chief Obasanjo’s letter to Mr. President dated December 2, 2013 and titled Before It Is Too Late:

    ‘I will maintain my serenity, because by this letter I have done my duty to you as I have always done, to your government, to the party, PDP, and to our country, Nigeria’.

    “Two, let me reiterate here, that Chief Olusegun Obasanjo, GCFR has tremendous respect for the office of the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.

    “Chief Olusegun Obasanjo sincerely appreciates all of you, my cherished colleagues; gentlemen and women of the media profession, who have been very upright, ethical and robust on the subject matter.”

     

  • Jonathan replies Obasanjo

    Jonathan replies Obasanjo

    RE: BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE

     

    I wish to formally acknowledge your letter dated December 2, 2013 and other previous correspondence similar to it.

    You will recall that all the letters were brought to me by hand. Although both of us discussed some of the issues in those letters, I had not, before now, seen the need for any formal reply since, to me, they contained advice from a former President to a serving President. Obviously, you felt differently because in your last letter, you complained about my not acknowledging or replying your previous letters.

    It is with the greatest possible reluctance that I now write this reply. I am most uneasy about embarking on this unprecedented and unconventional form of open communication between me and a former leader of our country because I know that there are more acceptable and dignified means of doing so.

    But I feel obliged to reply your letter for a number of reasons: one, you formally requested for a reply and not sending you one will be interpreted as ignoring a former President.

    Secondly, Nigerians know the role you have played in my political life and given the unfortunate tone of your letter, clearly, the grapes have gone sour. Therefore, my side of the story also needs to be told.

    The third reason why I must reply you in writing is that your letter is clearly a threat to national security as it may deliberately or inadvertently set the stage for subversion.

    The fourth reason for this reply is that you raised very weighty issues, and since the letter has been made public, Nigerians are expressing legitimate concerns. A response from me therefore, becomes very necessary.

    The fifth reason is that this letter may appear in biographies and other books which political commentators on Nigeria’s contemporary politics may write. It is only proper for such publications to include my comments on the issues raised in your letter.

    Sixthly, you are very unique in terms of the governance of this country. You were a military Head of State for three years and eight months, and an elected President for eight years. That means you have been the Head of Government of Nigeria for about twelve years. This must have, presumably, exposed you to a lot of information. Thus when you make a statement, there is the tendency for people to take it seriously.

    The seventh reason is that the timing of your letter coincided with other vicious releases. The Speaker of the House of Representatives spoke of my “body language” encouraging corruption. A letter written to me by the CBN Governor alleging that NNPC, within a period of 19 months did not remit the sum of USD49.8 billion to the federation account, was also deliberately leaked to the public.

    The eighth reason is that it appears that your letter was designed to incite Nigerians from other geopolitical zones against me and also calculated to promote ethnic disharmony. Worse still, your letter was designed to instigate members of our Party, the PDP, against me.

    The ninth reason is that your letter conveys to me the feeling that landmines have been laid for me. Therefore, Nigerians need to have my response to the issues raised before the mines explode.

    The tenth and final reason why my reply is inevitable is that you have written similar letters and made public comments in reference to all former Presidents and Heads of Government starting from Alhaji Shehu Shagari and these have instigated different actions and reactions. The purpose and direction of your letter is distinctly ominous, and before it is too late, my clarifications on the issues need to be placed on record.

    Let me now comment on the issues you raised. In commenting I wish to crave your indulgence to compare what is happening now to what took place before. This, I believe, will enable Nigerians see things in better perspective because we must know where we are coming from so as to appreciate where we now are, and to allow us clearly map out where we are going.

    You raised concerns about the security situation in the country. I assure you that I am fully aware of the responsibility of government for ensuring the security of the lives and property of citizens. My Administration is working assiduously to overcome current national security challenges, the seeds of which were sown under previous administrations. There have been some setbacks; but certainly there have also been great successes in our efforts to overcome terrorism and insurgency.

    Those who continue to down-play our successes in this regard, amongst whom you must now be numbered, appear to have conveniently forgotten the depths to which security in our country had plunged before now.

    At a stage, almost the entire North-East of Nigeria was under siege by insurgents. Bombings of churches and public buildings in the North and the federal capital became an almost weekly occurrence. Our entire national security apparatus seemed nonplussed and unable to come to grips with the new threat posed by the berthing of terrorism on our shores.

    But my administration has since brought that very unacceptable situation under significant control. We have overhauled our entire national security architecture, improved intelligence gathering, training, funding, logistical support to our armed forces and security agencies, and security collaboration with friendly countries with very visible and positive results.

    The scope and impact of terrorist operations have been significantly reduced and efforts are underway to restore full normalcy to the most affected North Eastern region and initiate a post-crisis development agenda, including a special intervention programme to boost the region’s socio-economic progress.

    In doing all this, we have kept our doors open for dialogue with the insurgents and their supporters through efforts such as the work of the Presidential Committee on Dialogue and the Peaceful Resolution of the Security Challenges in the North-East. You also know that the Governor of Borno State provided the items you mentioned to me as carrots. Having done all this and more, it is interesting that you still accuse me of not acting on your hardly original recommendation that the carrot and stick option be deployed to solve the Boko Haram problem.

    Your suggestion that we are pursuing a “war against violence without understanding the root causes of the violence and applying solutions to deal with all the underlying factors” is definitely misplaced because from the onset of this administration, we have been implementing a multifaceted strategy against militancy, insurgency and terrorism that includes poverty alleviation, economic development, education and social reforms.

    Even though basic education is the constitutional responsibility of States, my administration has, as part of its efforts to address ignorance and poor education which have been identified as two of the factors responsible for making some of our youth easily available for use as cannon fodder by insurgents and terrorists, committed huge funds to the provision of modern basic education schools for the Almajiri in several Northern States. The Federal Government under my leadership has also set up nine additional universities in the Northern States and three in the Southern States in keeping with my belief that proper education is the surest way of emancipating and empowering our people.

    More uncharitable persons may even see a touch of sanctimoniousness in your new belief in the carrot and stick approach to overcoming militancy and insurgency. You have always referred to how you hit Odi in Bayelsa State to curb militancy in the Niger Delta. If the invasion of Odi by the Army was the stick, I did not see the corresponding carrot. I was the Deputy Governor of Bayelsa State then, and as I have always told you, the invasion of Odi did not solve any militancy problem but, to some extent, escalated it. If it had solved it, late President Yar’Adua would not have had to come up with the amnesty program. And while some elements of the problem may still be there, in general, the situation is reasonably better.

    In terms of general insecurity in the country and particularly the crisis in the Niger Delta, 2007 was one of the worst periods in our history. You will recall three incidents that happened in 2007 which seemed to have been orchestrated to achieve sinister objectives. Here in Abuja, a petrol tanker loaded with explosives was to be rammed into the INEC building. But luckily for the country, an electric pole stopped the tanker from hitting the INEC building. It is clear that this incident was meant to exploit the general sense of insecurity in the nation at the time to achieve the aim of stopping the 2007 elections. It is instructive that you, on a number of occasions, alluded to this fact.

    When that incident failed, an armed group invaded Yenagoa one evening with the intent to assassinate me. Luckily for me, they could not. They again attacked and bombed my country home on a night when I was expected in the village. Fortunately, as God would have it, I did not make the trip.

    I recall that immediately after both incidents, I got calls expressing the concern of Abuja. But Baba, you know that despite the apparent concern of Abuja, no single arrest was ever made. I was then the Governor of Bayelsa State and the PDP Vice-Presidential candidate. The security people ordinarily should have unraveled the assassination attempt on me.

    You also raised the issues of kidnapping, piracy and armed robbery. These are issues all Nigerians, including me are very concerned about. While we will continue to do our utmost best to reduce all forms of criminality to the barest minimum in our country, it is just as well to remind you that the first major case of kidnapping for ransom took place around 2006. And the Boko Haram crisis dates back to 2002. Goodluck Jonathan was not the President of the country then. Also, armed robbery started in this country immediately after the civil war and since then, it has been a problem to all succeeding governments. For a former Head of Government, who should know better, to present these problems as if they were creations of the Jonathan Administration is most uncharitable.

    Having said that, let me remind you of some of the things we have done to curb violent crime in the country. We have reorganized the Nigerian Police Force and appointed a more dynamic leadership to oversee its affairs. We have also improved its manpower levels as well as funding, training and logistical support.

    We have also increased the surveillance capabilities of the Police and provided its air-wing with thrice the number of helicopters it had before the inception of the present administration. The National Civil Defence and Security Corps has been armed to make it a much more effective ally of the police and other security agencies in the war against violent crime. At both domestic and international levels, we are doing everything possible to curb the proliferation of the small arms and light weapons with which armed robberies, kidnappings and piracy are perpetrated. We have also enhanced security at our borders to curb cross-border crimes.

    We are aggressively addressing the challenge of crude oil theft in collaboration with the state Governors. In addition, the Federal Government has engaged the British and US governments for their support in the tracking of the proceeds from the purchase of stolen crude. Similarly, a regional Gulf of Guinea security strategy has been initiated to curb crude oil theft and piracy.

    Perhaps the most invidious accusation in your letter is the allegation that I have placed over one thousand Nigerians on a political watch list, and that I am training snipers and other militia to assassinate people. Baba, I don’t know where you got that from but you do me grave injustice in not only lending credence to such baseless rumours, but also publicizing it. You mentioned God seventeen times in your letter. Can you as a Christian hold the Bible and say that you truly believe this allegation?

    The allegation of training snipers to assassinate political opponents is particularly incomprehensible to me. Since I started my political career as a Deputy Governor, I have never been associated with any form of political violence. I have been a President for over three years now, with a lot of challenges and opposition mainly from the high and mighty. There have certainly been cases of political assassination since the advent of our Fourth Republic, but as you well know, none of them occurred under my leadership.

    Regarding the over one thousand people you say are on a political watch list, I urge you to kindly tell Nigerians who they are and what agencies of government are “watching” them. Your allegation that I am using security operatives to harass people is also baseless. Nigerians are waiting for your evidence of proof. That was an accusation made against previous administrations, including yours, but it is certainly not my style and will never be. Again, if you insist on the spurious claim that some of your relatives and friends are being harassed, I urge you to name them and tell Nigerians what agencies of my administration are harassing them.

    I also find it difficult to believe that you will accuse me of assisting murderers, or assigning a presidential delegation to welcome a murderer. This is a most unconscionable and untrue allegation. It is incumbent on me to remind you that I am fully conscious of the dictates of my responsibilities to God and our dear nation. It is my hope that devious elements will not take advantage of your baseless allegation to engage in brazen and wanton assassination of high profile politicians as before, hiding under the alibi your “open letter” has provided for them.

    Nevertheless, I have directed the security agencies and requested the National Human Rights Commission to carry out a thorough investigation of these criminal allegations and make their findings public.

    That corruption is an issue in Nigeria is indisputable. It has been with us for many years. You will recall that your kinsman, the renowned afro-beat maestro, Fela Anikulapo-Kuti famously sang about it during your first stint as Head of State. Sonny Okosun also sang about corruption. And as you may recall, a number of Army Generals were to be retired because of corruption before the Dimka coup. Also, the late General Murtala Mohammed himself wanted to retire some top people in his cabinet on corruption-related issues before he was assassinated. Even in this Fourth Republic, the Siemens and Halliburton scandals are well known.

    The seed of corruption in this country was planted a long time ago, but we are doing all that we can to drastically reduce its debilitating effects on national development and progress. I have been strengthening the institutions established to fight corruption. I will not shield any government official or private individual involved in corruption, but I must follow due process in all that I do. And whenever clear cases of corruption or fraud have been established, my administration has always taken prompt action in keeping with the dictates of extant laws and procedures. You cannot claim to be unaware of the fact that several highly placed persons in our country, including sons of some of our party leaders are currently facing trial for their involvement in the celebrated subsidy scam affair. I can hardly be blamed if the wheels of justice still grind very slowly in our country, but we are doing our best to support and encourage the judiciary to quicken the pace of adjudication in cases of corruption.

     

    Baba, I am amazed that with all the knowledge garnered from your many years at the highest level of governance in our country, you could still believe the spurious allegation contained in a letter written to me by the Governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN), and surreptitiously obtained by you, alleging that USD49.8 billion, a sum equal to our entire national budget for two years, is “unaccounted for” by the NNPC. Since, as President, you also served for many years as Minister of Petroleum Resources, you very well know the workings of the corporation. It is therefore intriguing that you have made such an assertion. You made a lot of insinuations about oil theft, shady dealings at the NNPC and the NNPC not remitting the full proceeds of oil sales to the of CBN. Now that the main source of the allegations which you rehashed has publicly stated that he was “misconstrued”, perhaps you will find it in your heart to apologize for misleading unwary Nigerians and impugning the integrity of my administration on that score.

     

    Your claim of “Atlantic Oil loading about 130, 000 barrels sold by Shell and managed on behalf of NPDC with no sale proceeds paid into the NPDC account” is also disjointed and baseless because no such arrangement as you described exists between Atlantic Oil and the Nigeria Petroleum Development Company. NPDC currently produces about 138, 000 barrels of oil per day from over 7 producing assets. The Crude Oil Marketing Division (COMD) of the NNPC markets all of this production on behalf of NPDC with proceeds paid into NPDC account.

    I am really shocked that with all avenues open to you as a former Head of State for the verification of any information you have received about state affairs, you chose to go public with allegations of “high corruption” without offering a shred of supporting evidence. One of your political “sons” similarly alleged recently that he told me of a minister who received a bribe of $250 Million from an oil company and I did nothing about it. He may have been playing from a shared script, but we have not heard from him again since he was challenged to name the minister involved and provide the evidence to back his claim. I urge you, in the same vein, to furnish me with the names, facts and figures of a single verifiable case of the “high corruption” which you say stinks all around my administration and see whether the corrective action you advocate does not follow promptly. And while you are at it, you may also wish to tell Nigerians the true story of questionable waivers of signature bonuses between 2000 and 2007.

    While, by the Grace of God Almighty, I am the first President from a minority group, I am never unmindful of the fact that I was elected leader of the whole of Nigeria and I have always acted in the best interest of all Nigerians. You referred to the divisive actions and inflammatory utterances of some individuals from the South-South and asserted that I have done nothing to call them to order or distance myself from their ethnic chauvinism. Again that is very untrue. I am as committed to the unity of this country as any patriot can be and I have publicly declared on many occasions that no person who threatens other Nigerians or parts of the country is acting on my behalf.

    It is very regrettable that in your letter, you seem to place sole responsibility for the ongoing intrigues and tensions in the PDP at my doorstep, and going on from that position, you direct all your appeals for a resolution at me. Baba, let us all be truthful to ourselves, God and posterity. At the heart of all the current troubles in our party and the larger polity is the unbridled jostling and positioning for personal or group advantage ahead of the 2015 general elections. The “bitterness, anger, mistrust, fear and deep suspicion” you wrote about all flow from this singular factor.

    It is indeed very unfortunate that the seeming crisis in the party was instigated by a few senior members of the party, including you. But, as leader of the party, I will continue to do my best to unite it so that we can move forward with strength and unity of purpose. The PDP has always recovered from previous crises with renewed vigour and vitality. I am very optimistic that that will be the case again this time. The PDP will overcome any temporary setback, remain a strong party and even grow stronger.

    Instigating people to cause problems and disaffection within the party is something that you are certainly familiar with. You will recall that founding fathers of the Party were frustrated out of the Party at a time. Late Chief Sunday Awoniyi was pushed out, Late Chief Solomon Lar left and later came back, Chief Audu Ogbeh and Chief Tom Ikimi also left. Chief Okwesilieze Nwodo left and later came back. In 2005/2006, link-men were sent to take over party structures from PDP Governors in an unveiled attempt to undermine the state governors. In spite of that, the Governors did not leave the Party because nobody instigated and encouraged them to do so.

    The charge that I was involved in anti-party activities in governorship elections in Edo, Ondo, Lagos, and Anambra States is also very unfortunate. I relate with all Governors irrespective of political party affiliation but I have not worked against the interest of the PDP. What I have not done is to influence the electoral process to favour our Party. You were definitely never so inclined, since you openly boasted in your letter of how you supported Alhaji Shehu Shagari against Chief Obafemi Awolowo, Chief Nnamdi Azikiwe and others in the 1979 presidential elections while serving as a military Head of State. You and I clearly differ in this regard, because as the President of Nigeria, I believe it is my duty and responsibility to create a level playing field for all parties and all candidates.

    Recalling how the PDP lost in states where we were very strong in 2003 and 2007 such as Edo, Ondo, Imo, Bauchi, Anambra, and Borno, longstanding members of our great party with good memory will also consider the charge of anti-party activities you made against me as misdirected and hugely hypocritical. It certainly was not Goodluck Jonathan’s “personal ambition or selfish interest” that caused the PDP to lose the governorship of Ogun State and all its senatorial seats in the last general elections.

    You quoted me as saying that I have not told anybody that I will seek another term in office in 2015. You and your ambitious acolytes within the party have clearly decided to act on your conclusion that “only a fool will believe that statement” and embark on a virulent campaign to harass me out of an undeclared candidature for the 2015 presidential elections so as to pave the way for a successor anointed by you.

    You will recall that you serially advised me that we should refrain from discussing the 2015 general elections for now so as not to distract elected public officials from urgent task of governance. While you have apparently moved away from that position, I am still of the considered opinion that it would have been best for us to do all that is necessary to refrain from heating up the polity at this time. Accordingly, I have already informed Nigerians that I will only speak on whether or not I will seek a second term when it is time for such declarations. Your claims about discussions I had with you, Governor Gabriel Suswam and others are wrong, but in keeping with my declared stance, I will reserve further comments until the appropriate time.

    Your allegation that I asked half a dozen African Presidents to speak to you about my alleged ambition for 2015, is also untrue. I have never requested any African President to discuss with you on my behalf. In our discussion, I mentioned to you that four Presidents told me that they were concerned about the political situation in Nigeria and intended to talk to you about it. So far, only three of them have confirmed to me that they have had any discussion with you. If I made such a request, why would I deny it?

    The issue of Buruji Kashamu is one of those lies that should not be associated with a former President. The allegation that I am imposing Kashamu on the South-West is most unfortunate and regrettable. I do not even impose Party officials in my home state of Bayelsa and there is no zone in this country where I have imposed officials. So why would I do so in the South West? Baba, in the light of Buruji’s detailed public response to your “open letter”, it will be charitable for you to render an apology to Nigerians and I.

    On the issue of investors being scared to come to Nigeria, economic dormancy, and stagnation, I will just refer you to FDI statistics from 2000 to 2013. Within the last three years, Nigeria has emerged as the preferred destination for investments in Africa, driven by successful government policies to attract foreign investors. For the second year running, the United Nations Conference on Trade and Investments (UNCTAD) has ranked Nigeria as the number one destination for investments in Africa, and as having the fourth highest returns in the world.

    Today, Nigeria is holding 18 percent of all foreign investments in Africa and 60 percent of all foreign investments in the ECOWAS Sub-Region. Kindly note also that in the seven years between 2000 and 2007 when you were President, Nigeria attracted a total of $24.9 Billion in FDI. As a result of our efforts which you disparage, the country has seen an FDI inflow of $25.7 Billion in just three years which is more than double the FDI that has gone to the second highest African destination. We have also maintained an annual national economic growth rate of close to seven per cent since the inception of this administration. What then, is the justification for your allegation of scared investors and economic dormancy?

    Although it was not emphasized in your letter of December 2, 2013, you also conveyed, in previous correspondence, the impression that you were ignorant of the very notable achievements of my administration in the area of foreign relations. It is on record that under my leadership, Nigeria has played a key role in resolving the conflicts in Niger, Cote d’Ivoire, Mali, Guinea Bissau and others.

    The unproductive rivalry that existed between Nigeria and some ECOWAS countries has also been ended under my watch and Nigeria now has better relations with all the ECOWAS countries. At the African Union, we now have a Commissioner at the AU Commission after being without one for so long. We were in the United Nations Security Council for the 2010/2011 Session and we have been voted in again for the 2014/2015 Session. From independence to 2010, we were in the U.N. Security Council only three times but from 2010 to 2015, we will be there two times.

    This did not happen by chance. My Administration worked hard for it and we continue to maintain the best possible relations with all centres of global political and economic power. I find it hard therefore, to believe your assertions of untoward concern in the international community over the state of governance in Nigeria

    With respect to the Brass and Olokola LNG projects, you may have forgotten that though you started these projects, Final Investment Decisions were never reached. For your information, NNPC has not withdrawn from either the Olokola or the Brass LNG projects.

    On the Rivers State Water Project, you were misled by your informant. The Federal Government under my watch has never directed or instructed the Africa Development Bank to put on hold any project to be executed in Rivers state or any other State within the Federation. The Rivers Water Project was not originally in the borrowing plan but it was included in April 2013 and appraised in May. Negotiations are ongoing with the AfDB. I have no doubt that you are familiar with the entire process that prefaces the signing of a Subsidiary Loan Agreement as in this instance.

    Let me assure you and all Nigerians that I do not engage in negative political actions and will never, as President, oppress the people of a State or deprive them of much needed public services as a result of political disagreement

    I have noted your comments on the proposed National Conference. Contrary to the insinuation in your letter, the proposed conference is aimed at bringing Nigerians together to resolve contentious national issues in a formal setting. This is a sure way of promoting greater national consensus and unity, and not a recipe for “disunity, confusion and chaos” as you alleged in your letter.

    Having twice held the high office of President, Commander-In-Chief of the Armed Forces of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, I trust that you will understand that I cannot possibly find the time to offer a line-by-line response to all the accusations and allegations made in your letter while dealing with other pressing demands of office and more urgent affairs of state.

    I have tried, however, to respond to only the most serious of the charges which question my sincerity, personal honour, and commitment to the oath which I have sworn, to always uphold and protect the interests of all Nigerians, and promote their well-being.

    In closing, let me state that you have done me grave injustice with your public letter in which you wrongfully accused me of deceit, deception, dishonesty, incompetence, clannishness, divisiveness and insincerity, amongst other ills.

    I have not, myself, ever claimed to be all-knowing or infallible, but I have never taken Nigeria or Nigerians for granted as you implied, and I will continue to do my utmost to steer our ship of state towards the brighter future to which we all aspire.

    Please accept the assurances of my highest consideration and warm regards.

     

    GOODLUCK EBELE JONATHAN

     

  • Obasanjo as Jonathan’s nemesis: moral ambiguity and cynicism in lieu of genuine reform

    Obasanjo as Jonathan’s nemesis: moral ambiguity and cynicism in lieu of genuine reform

    Farewell Remorse! All Good to me is lost; Evil be thou my Good!
    Satan, in Milton’s Paradise Lost, Book 4

    First a confession: it was not Milton’s Satan in Book 4 of Paradise Lost that first came to my mind after I had read, word by word, sentence by sentence, the entirety of Obasanjo’s recent explosive letter to Goodluck Jonathan; it was Tartuffe, the eponymous protagonist of Moliere’s classic play of that title, Tartuffe. Long before this latest salvo of raging moral fireworks from Obasanjo to Jonathan, I had always thought of OBJ as the ultimate embodiment of “Tartuffian” super-hypocritical moral unctuousness in contemporary Nigerian, African and world politics. For those who have not read Moliere’s play, Tartuffe is a holy, pious man who secretly craves all the things that he preaches relentlessly against – until he is finally tricked into exposing his true self and the fires of passion and desire that he masks under his unctuous moral sternness. But even after he is completely exposed, to the end Tartuffe clings to his holy mien, his mask of unwavering piety. The moral of this parable of gargantuan Tartuffian hypocrisy? Nothing, absolutely nothing that you do – or can do – will ever shame the Tartuffes of this life, this world into owning up to their moral weaknesses and venal foibles. This is Obasanjo, ineluctably and quintessentially the Grand Tartuffe of this day and age.

    As many commentators have remarked, with the exception of one or two important things that I will briefly engage later in this piece, Obasanjo is guilty, ten times guilty, of many of the extreme moral lapses and dire political failures that he pointed out and berated in Jonathan. Corruption around the presidency stinking to the high heavens? Didn’t Atiku Abubakar, in his very bitter quarrel with Obasanjo that was waged on the pages of the nation’s daily newspapers in 2006 reveal how wide, deep and unconscionable the corruption in Obasanjo’s presidency was? Being a man of honour and trustworthiness in not staying in office beyond your allotted and foresworn time? Didn’t Obasanjo nearly empty out the national treasury in bribes to members of the National Assembly and other ‘politicos’ in the so-called “Third Term” bid to unconstitutionally and immorally perpetuate himself in office? Turning the ruling party, the PDP, into an immoral and cynical instrument of the President and his selfish and self-centered wishes and desires at the risk of wrecking the ship of state and the polity? Isn’t this what Obasanjo did and perfected after he had removed Audu Ogbeh as the Party Chairman of the PDP? And in spite of all these things, hasn’t Obasanjo, in and out of office, regularly taken it upon himself to lecture the nation and the African continent on political morality and legal and constitutional probity? Hasn’t he gone round many African nations as an election monitor after he and Maurice Iwu had conducted the two worst election rigging debacles in Nigerian political history? Let us not mince words here, compatriots: Obasanjo is Tartuffe in an ersatz, modern-day Nigerian political incarnation!

    All the same, compatriots, it was not Moliere’s Tartuffe but Milton’s Satan in Paradise Lost that first came to my mind when I read Obasanjo’s letter to Jonathan and confronted the sheer enormity of his charges against the sitting President. I must explain here that Milton’s Satan is of course not the Satan of contemporary Nigerian Pentecostal demonology, an endlessly evil avatar without a shred of awareness of the good that he had once experienced and lived as God’s beloved lieutenant in Heaven. This Satan of the brotherhood and sisterhood of Nigerian Pentecostal prayer warriors is without any moral ambiguity, any contradictions of spirit and Being; therefore, he is absolutely outside the realm of the human, the ordinary, the familiar. By contrast, Milton’s Satan in Paradise Lost has known goodness; and he has never lost sight of the fact that he had been on the right hand side of God, right beside that incandescent and omniscient rectitude. Indeed, he retains a keen knowledge of that earlier state. This is why, in that ironic inversion that is perhaps the most widely quoted passage from Milton’s Paradise Lost – Evil, be thou my Good – Satan is still measuring himself and his projects in a discourse of the good. This makes him very human and incidentally, as virtually all Milton scholars have said again and again, the most engaging of all the characters in Milton’s classic epic poem on good and evil.

    This is the kind of very human, very ordinary “Satan” that has occupied Aso Rock Villa since 1999. The stench of superabundant evil in every known form coming from the Villa has been overwhelming and correspondingly, life has been a veritable hell on earth for the vast majority of our peoples in every part of the land. But it is not a demon but a very ordinary person who has been in charge of the miasmic rot and decay. That is what first came to my mind after I had finished reading Obasanjo’s epic letter to Jonathan: Evil, be thou my Good! All the three occupants of that highest of the high in the throne of political power and prestige in our country have been very religious-minded men, and with great ostentation too! First Obasanjo, then Yar’ Adua and now Jonathan, they never ceased talking about God, goodness, prayerfulness, even as the impunity of their moral cynicism grew into a bottomless bog threatening to drown the whole nation. On the evidence provided in Obasanjo’s letter to Jonathan, we are now at the very brink of that bottomless moral sinkhole. In other words, Jonathan has carried the project of “evil, be thou my good” to its ultimate limit beyond which lies the specter of national catastrophe.

    Earlier in this discussion, I drew attention to some charges that Obasanjo makes against Jonathan that separates the present incumbent of Aso Rock Villa from the other two previous occupants of the highest office in the land since 1999. Two of these are worthy of our special attention. First is an extreme and indeed extremist clannishness and divisiveness that no Nigerian ruler has ever either openly promoted or condoned in his supporters and henchmen. I think no one but the hardiest of Jonathan’s supporters will dispute the veracity of this charge. Secondly and far more concretely and specifically, Obasanjo has charged Jonathan with a project, a plan allegedly already being executed, to train about a thousand hit men or killers to go after those whose names have already been compiled in a watch list, this in preparation for or the run-up to the 2015 elections. Is this a frivolous and baseless charge? That is the question, compatriots.

    In the unspoken and perhaps unspeakable undercurrents of Obasanjo’s letter to Jonathan, I find the traumatizing anxieties of a very frightened man. His supporters will think and assert that the fear is for Nigeria, for what may happen to our country after Jonathan might have carried his policies and plans to their logical and practical conclusion. There seems to be a small iota of truth in this view of OBJ’s letter. But the real fear, the bracingly traumatizing anxiety that I see in the undercurrents of the letter is located elsewhere and this is in Obasanjo’s complete conflation of the historic fate of PDP, whatever that might be, with the fate of Nigeria, as if what may or will happen to the ruling party will also happen to the country.

    Before our very eyes, the PDP is imploding and doing so relentlessly. Now, Obasanjo has every reason to be fearful of the breakup, the end of the PDP which, as he sees it, Jonathan is haplessly and foolishly doing everything that he can to bring to its grand, ruinous finale. But as to whether the implosion, the breakup of the PDP will also spell unmitigated disaster for Nigeria, this is a moot point, not an inevitable conclusion. For me, it is remarkable that in a long, rambling letter that cried out against terribly evil things that are wrong in the Presidency and the ruling party, there is not a single suggestion, or a train of thought on how to deep, meaningful reform in our country’s elite politics. For instance, Obasanjo never even remotely addresses the all-important question of why the ruling party is so prone to complete subordination to the will, the whims and caprices of whoever it is that occupies the seat of power at Aso Rock, so much so that even as the President’s actions and policies are destroying the Party, nothing in the institutional, collective life of the Party can save it from the madness and folly of the President. And to be completely frank, I winced in enjoyment, not in pain, as I read again and again in Obasanjo’s letter to Jonathan his whinnying, helpless plea to Jonathan, as the ONLY person who has the power, to save the PDP from a looming, self-destructive implosion. Who among us had ever imagined that we could see Obasanjo as a whinny, whimpering supplicant to a political operator that he himself helped to create!

    I was treated, once again, to the self-righteous ranting of a Tartuffe in OBJ’s letter to Jonathan. But we have cause to be deeply worried. As the payer warriors like to remind us tirelessly, Satan is alive and doing his best to wreck millions of lives in our land. But it not the Satan that they conjure up to strike fear and terror in the gullible that we must worry about. It is Milton’s Satan with his chilling mantra that we have every cause to be deeply worried about: Evil, be thou my Good! For this “Satan” may be far more numerous in the PDP than in any other party, but his incarnation exists aplenty in the other political parties too. We must not be complacent about what it will take to bring about genuine moral and institutional reform in elite politics in our country.

    Biodun Jeyifo

    bjeyifo@fas.harvard.edu

  • ‘Obasanjo should be arrested and detained’

    ‘Obasanjo should be arrested and detained’

    Prelate and Moderator of the General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church of Nigeria, Most Rev. Emele Uka, told NICHOLAS KALU in Calabar that former President Olusegun Obasanjo’s letter to President Goodluck Jonathan is a calculated attempt to destabilise the country. The prelate advised Jonathan to arrest and detain the former president. Excerpts

    What are your thoughts about former President Olusegun Obasanjo’s letter to President Goodluck Jonathan?

    Anyone who has carefully read Obasanjo’s letter will notice that he does not mean well for this country.

    The tone and content of his letter have set the nation on a state of alert and anxiety and could destabilise the polity.

    We know that all power belongs unto God. And that it is God who has put our President in office. To insult the President is to insult God.

    I think the President, as the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces, should take immediate steps to order the arrest and detention of this man who behaves like a bull in a china shop, and thinks he is a god and very rich and can say and do what he likes in Nigeria (his private property) and get away with it.

    Obasanjo ruled and ruined this nation – Nigeria, and during his tenure, corruption index soared very high.

    During the course of Obasanjo’s administration, corrupt practices moved from an alarming state to the fatal state and oozed out such stench that stank to high heavens. Nobody could call him to order – if you did, he will pursue you ruthlessly and mercilessly with the coercive instruments of the state power, until he destroys you. He delights in inflicting such pain and shame on people close to him.

    He supported a tout to brazenly abduct a sitting Anambra State governor, Dr. Chris Ngige. Obasanjo master-minded the pre-mature exit of three senate presidents, who refused to dance to his tune – Chief Evans Enweren, Dr. Chuba Okadigbo and Chief Adolphus Nwagbara.

    He ordered the massacre of thousands of Tiv people in Zaki Biam in Benue State and committed a crime against humanity by ordering the killing of innocent civilians in Odi in Bayelsa State in 1999.

    Mr. President must not reply to Obasanjo’s mischievous, malicious and self serving letter.

    Silence, they say “is the best answer for a fool”. Therefore the President has no business in answering a foolish letter.

    And let nobody dare to think that because they have money they can threaten any section of this nation. Afterall, some of us have seen blood, tears, war in this country and the heavens did not fall.

    Obasanjo’s letter has a nuisance value; it is the product of a diseased mind who is trying to instigate a coup against the Nigerian government and people. It must be treated as a distraction and the President must not allow it to divert his energies in piloting the ship of state in the way and manner he deems best.

    This Obasanjo, it has been noted, has an obsession for power, and a tendency to control those in authority, when his attempt to control Jonathan failed, he now tries to incite the populace against him.

    You are calling for his arrest because of the letter. Don’t you think that would be infringement on his fundamental human right of freedom of expression, especially in a democracy?

    The freedom of expression as contained in the constitution does not mean that you should commit libel or use inciting statement to set the nation ablaze. So, his statements are not just ordinary, coming from a man of his stature. His statements are capable of destabilising the nation in times like this. So, Jonathan should use his powers as the Commander-in-Chief of Armed Forces to make sure nobody destabilises this nation and therefore should arrest and detain him. As Obasanjo puts it in his letter “before it is too late.”

    Don’t you think Obasanjo should be commended for speaking out boldly?

    He is not speaking out boldly. He is speaking out to destabilise the nation. It is not boldness. It is cowardly. That boldness is cowardice and demonic. It does not arise from truth and righteousness because if it were to be boldness, its consequences should be good not evil.

    Are you trying to say there is no truth at all in the matters he raised?

    Because of the person who raised it, it should be ignored. If he is not in power, he wants to find a way to confuse everybody.

    Do you still see any hope for this country?

    As an ordinary human who has lived in this country for over 60 years, I fear about the future of the country, given the practise of the corrupt, present leaders in the nation. All they are looking for is to grab power and use the resources of the nation as they like. They don’t have any good intention for the people, otherwise how could you allow a common man to be paid 18, 000 when you are earning millions? So, unless something radical is done to wipe out this crop of corrupt leaders, the future is bleak. But as a Christian, I still hope that God, along the line, would intervene to save his people.

    What is your message to Nigerians in the wake of all these?

    The people of Nigeria should not be afraid of Obasanjo’s letter. He thinks this nation is his own. So, I am asking Nigerians that Obasanjo is a Nigerian flesh and blood. No one should fear him. He wants to instigate fear. We should rather fear God and not Obasanjo.

  • ‘Obasanjo’s letter should set tone for national dialogue’

    ‘Obasanjo’s letter should set tone for national dialogue’

    Bishop Emmah Isong is the chairman of the Pentecostal Fellowship of Nigeria in Cross River State. In this interview with NICHOLAS KALU, he posits that former President Olusegun Obasanjo’s controversial letter to President Goodluck Jonathan should set the agenda for the proposed national dialogue. He also reacts to allegations against his person.

    Bishop, what are your thoughts of the former president’s letter to President Jonathan?

    I want to commend former President Olusegun Obasanjo for making Nigerians proud. I am sure he is being challenged by the legacy of Nelson Mandela to rise up to the occasion of an elder statesman which, to me, is already belated. I think that what an old man can sit down and see far, a young man, even if he climbs an iroko tree, cannot see it.

    It is a good letter. The facts as to whether the insinuations and submissions are perfectly correct are matters for the objectiveness and judgement of individuals and secondly whether President Goodluck Jonathan would accept the letter in good faith.

    If Obasanjo had lied or raised unnecessary alarm or accused the President falsely or tried to score a cheap political point or ride on the wings of propaganda to make a current impact, then Nigerians would judge for themselves.

    President Jonathan should respond well. He should prove to Nigerians that he loves this country and that the contents of the letter were simply imaginations and insinuations that do not portray his characteristics. After all, as a leader, there are many things that may go wrong and you won’t know. So, to me, it is a wonderful letter. All Nigerians should have full copies of the letter.

    But it has been argued that Obasanjo has no moral grounds to raise the issues he did?

    Whoever is saying that should also have written Obasanjo when he was the President of the country. We are talking of current issues. Nigerians have a way of answering question with question. We want matters exposed. We are talking about national dialogue. This should be the opening speech of the national dialogue. We are not looking at the credibility of who wrote the letter. We want the letter. Allegations are allegations. If Obasanjo was guilty of all the issues he raised, who wrote?

    So, you do not use questions to answer questions. Mr President could be innocent or guilty of the issues raised in the letter. But the justification for writing the letter is wonderful. I celebrate that letter.

    Obasanjo said he had tried to reach the President severally. It is at the level of frustration that he has to go public and, of course, he said that he is going public so that tomorrow if anything happens, they would not say he was here and something like this happened and you didn’t talk. We say we are practising democracy. Then why should somebody not write a letter. This is the thing about us Nigerians. People should feel free. Speak nonsense, speak good things. Look at the example of Nelson Mandela if you want to use him as a model of democracy in Africa. He allowed his enemies to speak and he listened to his critics. He forgave them, related with them and fellowshipped with them and today South Africa, I’m sorry to say, is on better pedestal in the eyes of the world than Nigeria.

    So, I think the essence of democracy is this kind of letter. It may not make meaning or it may be annoying, but that is democracy. The way the President would react to this letter would make it powerful or not powerful. But to sit down and say why you write, that is not a powerful defence.

    Does it mean if I am driving on the road and my tire is down and a mad man says “hey hey Bishop your tire is down,” you mean I should be stupid enough to say “you mad man, do you know I am a Bishop. I can even arrest you for calling my tire flat.”

    I need to stop and humble myself and fix my tire so that my life is safe and my journey faster. Mr President should thrash the issues. Mr President can use the letter to his advantage.

    Recently, there was an advertorial alleging that Governor Godswill Akpabio visited your church for prayers in relation to his 2015 Presidential ambition. It was also alleged that you prophesied that President Jonathan’s second term bid will fail. The same advertorial alleged that Governor Rotimi Amaechi of Rivers State also visited you because of his political fortunes. How true are these?

    I have access to Governor Akpabio anytime but there has been no secret visit. In fact, Akpabio has never visited my church. He is a governor of my home state. I am based in Cross River State. So, Liyel Imoke is the governor of the state where I am based and Akpabio is governor of the state where I come from. I have two governors actually. I have never seen Amaechi with my eyes. I have never had a hand shake with him. We have never discussed even on telephone. The person who said I told Amaechi anything is a drunk. I believe the people who put that in the daily are not real.

    As I said, Akpabio has never come to Calabar to visit me during the night or day time as alleged. But if we meet at functions, we greet and interact very well. Amaechi has not come here. Akpabio has not come here. So, I wonder where that is coming from.

     

     

     

     

     

  • PDM to NASS:  Investigate Obasanjo’s letter to Jonathan

    PDM to NASS: Investigate Obasanjo’s letter to Jonathan

    The Peoples Democratic Movement (PDM) has called on the National Assembly to investigate the letter written to President Goodluck Jonathan by former President Olusegun Obasanjo.

    In the said letter, Obasanjo had chronicled alleged atrocities being perpetrated by the Jonathan administration in the various sectors of the economy.

    The Presidency has not responded to the issues raised in the letter.

    In a statement issued on Monday by the National Publicity Secretary of the PDM, Ahmadu Rufai Abubakar, the party said the matters raised in the letter were troubling and unfortunate.

    Obasanjo had, among others, alleged non remittance of over $7 billion crude oil proceeds to the Federation Account by the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC).

    He also accused the President of training snipers for the purpose of attacking his political opponents ahead of the 2015 elections.

    The statement reads, “These are grave and weighty allegations indeed. We read, with deep disappointment, the President’s response or, better still, his non-response to these allegations, through his media aide.

    “The decision of the President to ignore these allegations, for now, is quite troubling and unfortunate.

    “It is totally inexplicable and unacceptable that the leader of our nation can assume that the nation can wait until such a time he feels the need to explain these grave allegations, some of which border on treason.

    “By his decision not to respond to these allegations immediately, the President is keeping Nigeria and Nigerians in unnecessary and dangerous suspense, “the statement added.

    The party insisted that Nigerians have a right to know the truth about the allegations raised in the letter, stressing that the President owed the Nigerian people an explanation.

    “It is not a matter of choice, it is a matter of duty for the President to respond immediately, failing which his government loses the legitimacy to continue to govern and he loses the moral right to continue to lead the country.

    “We view this decision by the President to defer a timely response seriously. We feel it is an abdication of duty and responsibility and it undermines the integrity of the office he occupies. It threatens the unity, peace and political stability of the nation.

    “In view of the above, the PDM calls on the National Assembly to discharge its duty and responsibility to the nation by compelling the President to offer an immediate response to the allegations levelled against him in the letter.”

     

  • Obasanjo, Jonathan and PDP crisis

    Obasanjo, Jonathan and PDP crisis

    Those who nurse the feeling that recent defection of five governors of the Peoples Democratic Party PDP to the All Progressives Congress APC is a fait accompli may have to tarry a while. Emerging signals from the political turf do not seem to give comfort that all is well with the much dramatized movement.

    The way things stand, it does appear we are yet to hear the last on which side of the political divide some of the defecting governors really stand. The impression one increasingly gets is that of a people waiting for some concessions from their erstwhile party before dashing back to base.

    President Jonathan gave an indication of this seeming confusion and ambivalence on the part of some of the governors in an interview in Paris, France. He had stated very emphatically that he is sure of two of the defectors whose hearts and souls are irredeemably in the APC while the other three are yet undecided.

    He further said even in the case of those who have made up their minds, some of the deputy governors do not share their ideas and are unlikely to move along with them.

    But these are the views of Jonathan whose party is entangled in the current pass. There is the temptation to regard these claims as some of those usual antics of politicians to shore up confidence when confronted with daunting challenges. There is therefore the lure to dismiss the claims as a desperate attempt by the PDP to save its face given the unmitigated embarrassment the defections have become.

    As this was not enough cause for worry, the letter written by former President Olusegun Obasanjo to President Jonathan in which he accused him of sundry misdeeds also gave clear indications that the PDP is not comfortable with the defections and many of its key promoters are bent on doing all within their powers not only to return its defecting members to the fold, but also maintain the leading role of the party in the country. Though Obasanjo touched on a number of allegations some of them very sweeping and intemperate, the main thesis of his presentation is on the current crisis in the PDP leading to disaffection and defection of five governors among others. Obasanjo is miffed by this development which he sees as not only capable of destroying the party but the entire country. He equates the PDP to Nigeria arguing that an inability to manage the crisis in the party would spell doom for the entire country. Obasanjo’s diatribe and smear campaign is rooted in the speculated ambition of Jonathan to run for the presidency in 2015 and its touted prospects of destroying the PDP. For him, that ambition has placed the country on the precipice and unless Jonathan retraces his steps, the country is heading for the rocks.

    These views do not seem to ascribe any value to the opposition APC since without PDP the country is finished. And to drive this point home, Obasanjo still believes that these disagreements could still be ‘turned to an opportunity for unity, mutual understanding and respect with the party emerging with enhanced strength and victory’. He then appealed to ‘defected, dissatisfied disgruntled and displeased PDP governors, legislators, party officials and party members to respond positively if the President seriously takes the initiative to find mutually agreeable solutions to the c u r r e n t problems’.

    What these underscore is the indubitable fact that the true intentions of the defecting governors and their party members are yet to be clear. At best, they are still sitting on the fence waiting for whatever concessions that could come from the president. This is more so with the reported attendance of the PDP governors’ meeting summoned by Jonathan at the villa by the duo of Rabiu Kwankwanso and Wammako of Kano and Sokoto states respectively.

    Before this article is published, Jonathan might have acceded to the demands of the governors to relieve Tukur of his position to make way for eventual reconciliation. This is a clear possibility. If this happens, he would have met a very key demand of the defectors as it would have taken care of mounting complaints of lack of internal democracy and high-handedness on the part of Tukur. The other demand of reigning in officials of the anti-graft agencies from harassing them and restoring party structures would have cued in appropriately. They will only be left with Jonathan’s second term ambition which Obasanjo has now confirmed there was no written agreement between Jonathan and anybody that he (Jonathan) will not run in 2015 but a statement of intent. Obasanjo claimed Jonathan confirmed to him in 2011 that if he adds the two years he inherited from Yar’Adua to another four years, he would have been done. He would therefore want him to keep to this promise to avoid the burden of moral overhang. But can we say in all sincerity that Jonathan has been allowed to concentrate on governance given the current distractions by the likes of Obasanjo and the challenge of Boko Haram insurgency which we have been told has its roots in opposition to his presidency? These are the issues to ponder when we consider the moral propriety of Jonathan going for another constitutional term. But then, what is all this hue and cry about Jonathan’s ambition destroying the country? Why must the inability of a section of the country to corner the presidency in 2015 culminate in its destruction? There is an indecent haste in the way and manner Jonathan is being intimidated to chicken out of the presidential race. There is also everything wrong with the impression Obasanjo sought to convey that unless power reverts to the north in 2015, hell will let loose. That has been the position coming from a section of the north. Many other states in the north are firmly behind Jonathan. Curiously Obasanjo has bought into that position and it is really very unfortunate. Given this, it is inherently ridiculous and insincere of him to accuse Jonathan of dividing the country along ethnic and religious lines. Nothing can be farther from the truth than this. Is it Jonathan that created Boko Haram that has not only expelled southerners from the north but also threatened to annihilate Christians in the north as if there are no northern Christians? What of the years of festering religious riots in that part of the country?

    Those fanning embers of discord are the people who promised to make the country ungovernable for Jonathan and have since made good their threat through all manner of contrived subterfuge.

    Obasanjo is guilty of falsifying extant realities and to that extent his recent letter is meant to get even having lost grip of power in the PDP. Is there anything the north kept in Aso Rock that if they do not enter there in 2015 that part of the country will no longer survive? Or put differently, are they seeking power for the north or the entire country? And if they seek power for the good of the entire country, six years thereon may not make much difference in the history of this nation to warrant the unnecessary heating up of the polity.

    Even then, the possibility cannot be ruled out that Jonathan may eventually not run. But if the gang up is to intimidate him to chicken out, instead of going through due process, it may boomerang. Its outcome may end up swelling public sympathy in his favor. If eventually he opts out of the race, there is everything to suggest that the defected governors and party members may hurry back to the PDP in droves. Then, everything would have been perfect with the party. What a huge contradiction!

    This will only go to reinforce the view that these defections are neither based on parity in ideological leaning nor shared values on how best to conduct the affairs of governance.

    It is therefore, a political risk for the APC to trust the defectors given their current posturing. They could be moles in the new arrangement.

  • Open letter to General Obasanjo

    Open letter to General Obasanjo

    Dear General,

    My first reaction at seeing your letter to President Goodluck Jonathan was anger. I was not surprised that you chose to present such weighty problems to the Nigerian public. It is your stock in trade. You did the same to his predecessors. You laid bare their weaknesses to the public and almost provoked riotous reaction to the governments, even when the military was in power. However, I was angry initially because your performance in office is still very fresh. You could not have had such a poor impression of Nigerians as to believe we would not recollect the incalculable damage you did to the polity.

    However, on reflection, I thought it better to read the entire letter and see the truth or otherwise in it. The messenger, sometimes, is not as important as the message.

    Before I go further, perhaps I should remind you of the harm you did to Nigerians. The third term bid easily comes to mind here. While you accuse Jonathan of attempting to breach an agreement to serve one term, did you realise that as you pointed that finger at him, four others wagered at you that he is merely following in your footsteps? Your deputy, Alhaji Atiku Abubakar fought you in 2003 on the ground that you had promised to stay in power for four years and no more. But, by the end of that tenure, you could not resist the lure of office. After all, at least, Ota Farm that had been run down while you were in prison had received a new lease of life and you wanted to keep the benefits of power.

    General, I covered proceedings at the National Political Reform Conference. I know all you did to influence delegates. I am a living witness of what you did to get members of the National Assembly amend the constitution to allow your perpetual hold on power. Have you therefore asked yourself where you derive the moral right to query Jonathan who is merely taking after you on this score?

    In my estimation, no one has done as much damage to the polity and democracy like you. Each time I think about the history of Nigeria, I try to shut out the allegations of the late Chief Obafemi Awolowo that you deliberately tilted the 1979 election in favour of Alhaji Shehu Shagari and his party, the National Party of Nigeria (NPN). It is good that, so many years after, you appear to have concurred that you did all necessary to put the Sokoto-born politician in power. But, your deeds in Imo, Rivers, Oyo, Ogun among others are sealed in the book of national records. If anyone is in doubt, he only needs to ask Rotimi Amaechi and Araraume, Ladoja and Amosun about your amazing manipulation of the system against them. Could anyone have forgotten what you did in getting only six lawmakers to impeach Joshua Dariye of Plateau State?

    Even the installation of Yar’Adua, and by extension, Jonathan in 2007 had your signature and stamp. You had to eliminate more qualified candidates in the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) to prepare the way for Yar’Adua. We could not have forgotten how you did so. In case we forgot, anyway, Odili, Duke and others could not have been so forgetful. They are still alive and would easily remind us.

    However, as I earlier pointed out, I still found your letter sufficiently provocative to have read every word of it. I do not share the view of those who insist that we should be so angry with you and your predictable reaction to issues to ignore those allegations; that would amount to cutting the nose to spite the face. I told a few friends who asked my views on the development that my reaction is the same as I would were a notorious robber to volunteer information about plans by a gang to attack my residence. I would not dismiss the information on the ground of the character of the messenger.

    We cannot afford to dismiss the allegation that Jonathan is raising a killer squad ahead of the 2015 elections. It does not matter to me if you did the same. What the regime has done in Delta and Anambra tends to suggest that you might not have manufactured the intelligence. I watched in horror as the electoral commission, the security agencies and the beneficiaries shamelessly manufactured figures and the process to achieve a pre-determined end. It is an indication that the government in power is desperate and would do anything to hang on to power.

    The prevailing mood in the country suggests that any attempt by the government to press its advantages and privileges could be met with force by the opposing side, realising that taking a resort to the judiciary could be a waste of time.

    My dear General, you have taken the first step in apprising us of dangerous developments in the country. To me, despite my reservations about you, this is commendable. However, some of us are not taken in by your demonstration of seeming altruism. I know you sufficiently enough to realise that the only reason you released the letter was to win public sympathy and see if you could begin to clean up your public image or, better still, to serve narrow interests.

    Let me just conclude by thanking you for setting in motion a chain of reactions which neither you, your cohorts or adversaries may control as me glide towards 2015.

    You may have your laugh now.

  • ‘How Jonathan, Obasanjo parted ways’

    ‘How Jonathan, Obasanjo parted ways’

    The seed of the stand-off between President Goodluck Jonathan and his estranged benefactor,ex-President Olusegun Obasanjo,was sowed about two years ago, before blowing into the open on Wednesday, The Nation can now reveal.

    Their differences revolve around seven issues, according to well-placed sources in Abuja.

    Although the duo, against all expectations, shared breakfast in Nairobi, Kenya, on Thursday, it was gathered that President Jonathan may henceforth keep Obasanjo at bay on account of the ex-president’s “toxic” letter.

    Presidency sources said the anger generated by the letter is yet to subside.

    Their differences stemmed from:

    •Rejection of some ministerial nominees and chief executives of departments and agencies from the South-West from Obasanjo;

    •Alleged refusal of Jonathan to consult Obasanjo on key policies and decisions of the government;

    •Disagreement over the leadership of PDP at national level and in the South-West, especially the sack of Obasanjo’s loyalists like ex-Governor Olagunsoye Oyinlola, ex-Governor Segun Oni and Bode Mustapha;

    •The rise of G-7 and ultimate defection;

    •Obasanjo’s allegation of Jonathan’s administration of lack of direction, especially on anti-graft war;

    •Use of international fora to write off the administration of Jonathan; and

    •Second term aspiration of Jonathan.

    Investigation by our correspondent revealed that Jonathan and Obasanjo had been patching their relationship over the last two years.

    Some months ago, Jonathan was said to have confronted Obasanjo and accused the ex-president of undermining him.

    Jonathan, sources said, accused Obasanjo of supporting the PDP G-7 governors.

    It was learnt that Obasanjo denied the allegation and assured Jonathan of support.

    The source added: “Obasanjo’s disagreement with Jonathan started from the ministerial nomination. The ex-President sought input into nominations from the South-West, but Jonathan restricted him to Ogun State. He said Obasanjo could not singlehanded nominate ministers from the South-West when there is a PDP structure in place.

    “The ex-President was also not happy that the Jonathan administration does not consult him on all policy issues, decisions of the government and strategic appointments. The ex-President felt the President had been hijacked by those he did not want in government,”the source said.

    One of those who allegedly “offended Obasanjo” in the past was the Secretary to the Government of the Federation, Chief Anyim Pius Anyim.

    His appointment was said to have been made without consultation with Obasanjo.

    When the matter was brought to Anyim’s attention, he personally went to meet Obasanjo to plead forgiveness for whatever offence he might have committed.

    Obasanjo reportedly told Anyim there was no quarrel.

    The emergence of Bamanga Tukur as the National Chairman of PDP and the attendant crisis in the party appeared to have deepened the crack in the relationship between the two leaders, while the alleged hijack of the South-West PDP structure from Obasanjo pained the ex-President.

    “But with anti-second term campaign for Jonathan, it was strategically important for the PDP to restrict Obasanjo to his only vote at the PDP National Convention for presidential primaries than to allow him control the party structure and wreak havoc,” one source said.

    The Presidency was also said to have received intelligence reports on Obasanjo’s remarks at several international gatherings including some in the USA in which he allegedly made uncomplimentary remarks about the administration.