Tag: Obasanjo

  • Obasanjo, Fashola for cassava seminar

    Obasanjo, Fashola for cassava seminar

    The Lagos Chamber of Commerce and Industry (LCCI), in partnership with stakeholders, is set to renew campaign for inclusion of cassava flour in baking bread and confectioneries.

    In a statement, the Public Relations Manager, LCCI, Mr Tope Oluwaleye, said the seminar scheduled for June 13, at the LCCI Conference and Exhibition Centre in Alausa, Ikeja, will be attended by former President Olusegun Obasanjo, as guest of honour. Lagos State Governor, Babatunde Fashola, is the Special Guest of Honour.

    Keynote address will be delivered by the Chairperson, Science and Technology Committee of the Chamber, Mrs. Josephine Maduka.

    The theme of the seminar is, ‘High Quality Cassava Production & Utilisation in Baking and Allied Industries: Status, Trend and Opportunities.’

  • Obasanjo not patriotic, says PDP chieftain

    Obasanjo not patriotic, says PDP chieftain

    A former Deputy Chairman of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Alhaji Shuaib Oyedokun, has slammed former President Olusegun Obasanjo for his recent comments on national issues.

    He said his actions lacked patriotism and nationalism.

    Speaking with reporters in Osogbo yesterday, Oyedokun said Obasanjo’s recent posture against the presidency is an embarrassment to the Yoruba.

    He said: “His actions are a source of worry to us. Obasanjo is destroying the PDP and the opposition is harping on this. We are constrained to let the world know that Obasanjo is on his own. Whatever he is doing or saying does not represent our interest.

    “I have been receiving calls and text messages. They ask what are we doing in the Southwest about Obasanjo’s problems? His comments outside the country portray Nigeria in bad light.”

    Alhaji Oyedokun dissociated the Southwest elders caucus of the PDP from whatever Chief Obasanjo might be saying on national issues.

    He said his opinion does not represent the opinion of the people of the geo-political zone.

    Oyedokun said the PDP elders have resolved not to cast aspersions on the personality of the former president, whom he described as an international figure.

    He said it was unfortunate that Obasanjo was not mindful of his posture globally, adding that it was easy for the international community to believe whatever he said.

    Alhaji Oyedodun, who was the Secretary to the Oyo State Government during the Omololu Olunloyo administration on the platform of the defunct National Party of Nigeria (NPN), faulted Chief Obasanjo’s visit to Borno State.

    He said the former president only played to the gallery by visiting the state, which is one of the Northern states under the Boko Haram siege.

    Oyedokun said if Obasanjo was visiting the state out of patriotism rather than playing to the gallery, he should have consulted the elders.

    He also berated him for not attending the last Democracy Day in Abuja.

    Said he: “I was sad that he was absent at the Democracy Day. Why on earth could someone of Obasanjo’s status abandon the Democracy Day? Why should he abandon the May 29 he established. It means he did not believe in it.

    “He aborted his trip to Morocco on that day to attend a programme in Jigawa State. We don’t know why Obasanjo is doing these. He put the President there and if he has done anything wrong, he should call him and let him know.

    “People are asking if we won’t do anything about Obasanjo. His actions are putting us in a precarious situation. Whatever we say now as elders, people don’t believe us again. So, we are all saying no to Obasanjo’s actions.

    “We are not going to sit down silently and allow him drag us back. I am speaking on behalf of the elders in the Southwest. Obasanjo should stop playing God. He is using the social, economic and other powers he has, but we have abandoned him.

    “His activities are not helping us at all. We are surprised by his current behaviours. Some say it is inherent in him to want to be noticed. But I think God has already done so much for him not to be noticed.

    “Is it joblessness? But this is an ex-President with an empire enough to occupy him. Globally he is known to be busy. Is it personal hatred for Jonathan? But he put him there in the first place. He convinced many of us to support Jonathan in his first term.

    “Some are saying Obasanjo is clever. That he is playing safe before the power shift to maintain a balance. Even some are saying he does not want any government to supercede him.”

    Alhaji Oyedokun accused Chief Obasanjo of using anti-graft bodies, such as the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) and the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC) to hound and coerce the PDP governors to be loyal to him.

    He said it was lamentable that the anti graft agencies focused on the PDP governors, wondering if the opposition governors were all that clean.

    On the Nigeria Governors’ Forum (NGF), the PDP chieftain said the governors have turned the forum into a cult with so much power. He said if he has the power, he would recommend that the NGF be scrapped.

    He said the suspension of the River State Governor Rotimi Ameachi by the PDP is not punitive, but a process that could end in punishment or reward for him, depending on the outcome of the investigation on his case.

     

  • Presidency:  No intention  to probe Obasanjo

    Presidency: No intention to probe Obasanjo

    The Presidency said yesterday that President Goodluck Jonathan has no intention, whatsoever, to probe the Obasanjo Administration on the strength of the former President’s “constant” criticisms of the current administration.

    Reacting to a newspaper report that the President planned to probe Obasanjo following his recent public statement in Dutse, Jigawa State where he appeared to be rooting for Governor Sule Lamido to contest the 2015 presidential election, presidential spokesman, Dr Reuben Abati, said no attempt to “drive a wedge between him and other respected elders and leaders of his party” will succeed.

    President Jonathan, he said, “remains fully focused on the urgent tasks of assuring peace, security and stability across the country to create the right conditions for rapid socio-economic development and will not be distracted from this objective.”

    Abati spoke of Jonathan’s ‘greatest respect for Obasanjo’s very notable contributions to national growth and development over many years and far from taking offence or seeking retaliation’ and said he “will always welcome objective criticism and advice from the very highly-regarded elder statesman.”

    “What is more, President Jonathan regards his administration as a continuation of the unbroken chain of PDP-led governments started by Chief Obasanjo in 1999 which have worked tirelessly to entrench democratic governance and achieve rapid socio-economic growth in the country.

    “Rather than order a pointless probe of his predecessors, he will continue to do his utmost best to build on the solid foundations for national progress laid under previous PDP administrations.”

  • 2015: Obasanjo calls for leadership change

    2015: Obasanjo calls for leadership change

    FORMER President Olusegun Obasanjo reopened yesterday what is arguably Nigeria’s most critical issue – leadership.

    “You know you can help somebody to get the job, but you cannot help him to do it. If somebody cannot do the job, we have Sule Lamido who we are confident can do the job,” he told a crowd of would-be investors, dignitaries and ordinary folks in Dutse, capital of Jigawa State.

    It was at the opening of the First Jigawa State Economic and Investment Summit at the Sir Amadu Bello Hall at the state secretariat.

    Obasanjo did not elaborate on his statement and it was not immediately clear whether he was talking about the 2015 election. Jigawa State Governor Lamido is being rumoured to be interested in the presidential race with Rivers State Governor Rotimi Amaechi as his running mate. He has said he is yet to think about 2015.

    Although he did not mention the President’s name in Dutse yesterday, Obasanjo has been critical of the Dr. Goodluck Jonathan administration.

    He has spoken against its handling of the Boko Haram insurgency and the growing unemployment, saying it is a bomb waiting to explode.

    Obasanjo said the government should have approached the Boko Haram insurgency the way he (Obasanjo) handled the killing of security men in Odi (Bayelsa State) and Zaki Biam (Benue State) communities when he was the president.

    But President Jonathan fired back, saying the soldiers Obasanjo sent to Odi failed to get those who killed the security men.

    Dr. Jonathan said as deputy governor of Bayelsa State at the time, he discovered, when he visited Odi after the military raid, that only women and children were killed by the soldiers.

    Obasanjo has also in recent time, distanced himself from activities of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) , which is immersed in crises. He resigned his membership of the Board of Trustees (BoT).

    The former president however revealed that, he was the one who imposed Lamido on the people of Jigawa. He is happy that he was not disappointed, he said.

    Obasanjo also called on governors to maintain cordial relationship with the Federal Government so as to ensure meaningful development.

    He said there was need for governors to show full cooperation with the government at the centre for the common interest of the nation and its citizens.

    The former President also described Jigawa state as a fertile ground for investment. He urged both local and international investors to locate their investment potentials in the state.

    According to him, Jigawa is not only peaceful, it has acquired the needed infrastructure and resources capable of boosting business and enterprises.

    Obasanjo described Jigawa state as the most investor-friendly in the country, citing stable security, peace and huge presence of needed infrastructure as his reasons.

    Obasanjo said the problem of the country’s leadership is, “that of unmet expectations stressing that governments must invest in the people’s education to overcome poverty, redundancy and criminalities.

    He explained that good governance is key for any practical and factual economic development plan, “the government is not expected to invest directly, but to provide enabling environment for private investors to exploit.

    “The way Sule Lamido has revitalised the Jigawa State – education sector, adequate provision of good roads network, infrastructure, social security, free trade – has now made the state to be a haven for investors, and to the best of my knowledge, today there is nowhere in Nigeria where investors can have confidence in doing business that is greater than Jigawa State.

    “I am optimistic that, this summit would help in making out long-term economic plan that would lead to the successful economic development that would be translated into the increase of employment, wealth creation, poverty reduction and improve the well-being of the people of the state and Nigeria”

    Lamido recalled his inaugural speech six years ago. He said: “As you all might be aware, our state manifests the worst indices of underdevelopment.

    “It was the electioneering campaign tour that exposed me to the problems of our people in that most pathetic degree. The tour brought me face to face with the uniquely unmitigated case of underdevelopment called Jigawa state”, he said.

    The governor observed that as he settled down in office, he discovered that the elite in the state were living in a world of their own that ensured total disconnect with the ordinary citizens

    He said his resolve to run the government best practices in governance has helped to liberate the state from the pains and agony of underdevelopment.

    He said: “Today, we want to announce to the whole world with all the noise we can muster that we are ready and our doors are now open to take Jigawa to the next level”.

    Chairman of the summit Lord Paul Boateng, said he has the conviction that the state can become a ‘Super Eagle’ in the economic world.

    “Nigeria is Africa’s biggest direction for foreign investment”, he said, warning that “we must also need to recognise that Africa is the father of its own progress”.

    In her vote of thanks, the Commissioner for Commerce, Hajiya Hauwa Sulaiman Baffa, thanked Diamond Bank among others for supporting the summit.

  • Resources must be tapped for Nigeria’s development – Obasanjo

    Former President Olusegun Obasanjo on Wednesday tasked political leaders to adopt practical measures to accelerate effective utilisation of human and natural resources for sustainable development of the country.

    Obasanjo gave the challenge while speaking at the maiden Jigawa Economic and Investment Summit in Dutse.

    The summit was organised by the state as part of the activities to mark the 2013 Democracy Day celebration.

    The major highlight of the summit was to encourage investment on agriculture, information and communication technology (ICT), solid minerals and small and medium scale enterprises (SMEs).

    Obasanjo said that Nigeria was endowed with abundant natural and human resources, which could be transformed to the social and economic benefit of the people.

    “Nigeria is a land of opportunities and it is blessed with all it takes to develop. It has been stagnant for so long, it is about time to change these opportunities to actuality.

    “There is no reason why we should not do that, we must invest in education to save the larger population of the country or else our population will become a liability,” he said.

    The former president said that for Nigeria to attain sustainable development, children must be trained, educated and be skilled in every sector to be self-reliant.

     

  • GDP growth must reflect on people’s life – Obasanjo

    GDP growth must reflect on people’s life – Obasanjo

    Former president Olusegun Obasanjo in Addis Ababa on Sunday urged African economists and development experts to address the lopsided Gross Domestic Product growth that failed to add value to the life of the people on the continent.

    The News Agency of Nigeria reports that Obasanjo spoke in the context of the Africa’s five per cent GDP growth rate that placed the continent among the fastest growing global economies.

    The ex-Nigerian leader, who was among members of a panel on the United Nations Development Programme Rise of the South 2013 report, code-named: “The African Renaissance in the context of the Rise of the South,” said it was worrisome that the rate of Africa’s GDP growth of about five per cent annually was not showing by way of improvement on the lives of the people.

    He urged the UN Development agencies, economic experts and Governments of African countries to address the situation before it becomes a serious setback to the continent’s development.

    He said Nigeria had recorded seven per cent GDP growth over the last decade, especially in oil and gas, telecommunication, banking and financial sector and few others.

    “But we need a kind of growth that would reflect on the lives of the people and the environment in terms of water supply to the villages, electricity and infrastructure; that is the kind of growth we want.

    “The economists should address that to change the current situation, where the GDP is growing while the people continue to suffer,” the News Agency of Nigeria quoted Obasanjo as saying at the forum.

    He urged the UNDP to reflect on the impact of the GDP growth and find ways of ensuring that it matches or comes to terms with the development of the common man in the rural areas.

    On his part, former Ghanaian President, Mr. John Kufuor, harped on the need for good leadership, prudence in governance and people’s active participation in governance to usher in more sustainable growth that would impact positively on the lives of the common African.

  • Tambuwal  on Obasanjo

    Tambuwal on Obasanjo

    Chief Olusegun Obasanjo was not the main subject of Hon Aminu Tambuwal’s lecture last Wednesday in Kano, but the former president (1999-2007) received unsparing and uncomplimentary mention enough to merit strong headlines in the following day’s newspapers. In an exhaustive treatise delivered at the annual Mallam Aminu Kano memorial lecture, Tambuwal, who is Speaker of the House of Representatives, described Obasanjo’s government as a proponent of lawlessness. He went beyond just describing that government as lawless and arbitrary, he added that it also endangered the country’s democracy. He damned the Obasanjo presidency with faint praise for establishing various institutions to undergird democracy and good governance, and concluded that that government lacked the discipline to restrain its law enforcement agencies from mass killings in both Zaki Biam and Odi towns in Benue and Bayelsa States respectively.

    Drawing on various sources, Tambuwal gave the following summary of the Obasanjo presidency and the Umaru Yar’Adua and Goodluck Jonathan governments: “A closer examination of the actions and inactions of the government since 1999 shows that the rule of law has been relegated to a mere declaration in conformity with the ideological smokescreen of the government. An example of the strangulation of the rule of law is the failure in recognising and respecting the constitutional roles of the three main institutions of State namely the legislature, the executive and the Judiciary. The political imbroglio between the Lagos State government and Federal Government over the failure of the latter to remit funds allocated to local government councils in Lagos following the State Governor’s creation of some additional council is a case in point of bizarre executive lawlessness on the part of the executive arm of government in Nigeria. Despite the judgment of the Supreme Court on the matter, the federal government turned deaf ears to the ruling of the highest court in the land ordering the Lagos State to be given all the statutory allocations due to LG councils in the state. Indeed it was the late Yar’Adua regime in 2007 that enforced the Supreme Court ruling and ordered the immediate release of the funds to Lagos State amounting to N10.8 billion.”

    The Tambuwal conclusion is not significant simply because he mourned the abject failure of Obasanjo and his successors to seize opportunities to consolidate democracy, or because he wanted the mass killings in Zaki Biam and Odi to be censured. It is in fact not clear that the Speaker saw any significance. What is significant is that the governments the Speaker spoke disapprovingly about were all produced by the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP). He is, however, not the only one with such strident views of the ruling party, though he is a member of the party. But to hear him and others in the PDP speak forthrightly and dismissively of all the governments that have ruled Nigeria since 1999 gives the heartwarming impression that the process of party formation is just beginning. The political dividing lines are not yet cast in granite, and in the foreseeable future there will still be movements across party lines, with patriots sensibly ignoring party loyalties and structures in order to form and nurture alliances capable of rebuilding the country’s democracy.

    Beyond the façade of one-party dominance of the polity, a façade PDP leaders said could continue for some 60 years, clearly discernible undercurrents of resentment against mediocre governance, executive arbitrariness, and mishandled economic reforms are being seen and felt. Tambuwal’s lecture, assuming it is the product of deep conviction rather than a mere academic exercise, indicates quite appropriately that substantial change is afoot, perhaps strong and copious enough to save the polity and engender growth and stability.

     

     

     

  • Are there any signs or resources of hope in this troubled land (and this earth)? (3)

    Are there any signs or resources of hope in this troubled land (and this earth)? (3)

    I begin this concluding piece in the series with the very last paragraph in last week’s column which ended with three questions that will frame this essay. Here is the paragraph:

    We can be sure that no ruler in Nigeria will ever bring out the tanks and the troops to stop the vast throng of worshippers, the sea of humanity going to or coming from an MFM revival; as a matter of fact, this is something that would warm their hearts. We can also deduce from the two cases of Obasanjo’s “Third Term” bid and the Turai Yar’ Adua “palace coup” that when the masses intervene to clean up the mess created by our political class, the powers that be will also not bring out the troops and the tanks. Since they did so when the masses were on the move during the fuel subsidy removal strike, three questions arise. One: Which of these instances of mass movement and action constitutes a real source of hope for our country and its teeming masses of the looted and the disenfranchised? Two: Are these three different cases in fact unrelated? Three: What is the point in asking this sort of questions?

    My answer to these questions may surprise many of my readers and it is this: Each of these three instances of mass movement and action in Nigeria is potentially a valid source of hope for our country. Freedom is indivisible and hope exists on many levels and wears many masks. The true mark of democracy in our country and our world is that people must have the freedom to assemble, to march and to act in the public sphere for religious, ceremonial, festive or political reasons, as long as they do so without hindering or negating the freedom of others. For this reason, it is a very retrograde thing, a mark of the sorry state of our current experiment in non-military democratic governance for one kind of mass movement and action to be allowed while another kind is met with maximum use of force and intimidation. Let me put this contention in concrete terms.

    In last week’s column, I mentioned the endless sea of worshippers coming from a mass revivalist meeting of the MFM. To this I added the observation that no government, no ruler in Nigeria would ever dare to bring out the troops and the armored tanks to stop this endless throng of the faithful giving expression to their deepest faith and hope in God and divine grace, even if they stop the flow of traffic in a major city for two hours. To this we can add the fact that that all travelers on the Lagos-Ibadan expressway routinely encounter even a much bigger assemblage of communicants at the altar of religious epiphany at the “Redeem Junction”, an assemblage so vast that quite often all traffic on the most important artery of the national highway grid comes to a complete stop for hours on end. Again, we can safely assume that no government, state or federal, has it in mind to put a stop to this phenomenon that is probably without any parallel in our country or our continent.

    By contrast, consider this: In early January 2012, at the height of the very successful nation-wide strike against the removal of oil subsidies by the administration of Goodluck Jonathan, an equally mammoth procession of protesters that started at the Lagos State House of Assembly and headed towards the Gani Fawehinmi Park at Ojota was met by the troops and tanks of the 9th Brigade of the Nigerian Army that was personally supervised by the brigade commander, Brigadier-General Sani Muazu. Not only did the general and his men stop the march, Muazu, as reported in The Guardian of January 17, 2012, actually stated that once the government and the trade unions had declared that the strike was over, the protest march had become illegal and could not be permitted to take place notwithstanding the fact that this was a completely peaceful protest march that was led by legislators, academics and very prominent citizens.

    It is heartening to report that this extremely warped and stunted definition of the democratic legality of mass protests and marches in our country was vigorously contested by many prominent politicians and citizens, among them Governor Fashola of Lagos State. But there is more to this matter than verbal condemnation of the severe restriction placed by the Nigerian state on the freedom of the Nigerian masses to organize protests against the horrific conditions and realities that they face on a daily, even hourly basis. Let me explain what I mean by this assertion and in doing so bring the discussion closer to our fears and anxieties about the forthcoming state and federal elections of 2015 concerning statements that have been made – and are still being made – by many of our politicians that these may well be the last set of elections in the country we currently know as Nigeria.

    Basically, to me this state of affairs means that, once again, we are at a conjunctural moment in the politics of democratic governance in our country. There are three principal features to this conjuncture. We can deal quickly with the first two of these features. One: Only on the basis of another implosion will Jonathan get the nomination of the ruling party, the PDP; if internal democracy prevails in the run of primaries within the party before the general elections, he will not get the nomination for another term in office. But internal democracy has never been a notable feature within the PDP and we are not about to see a reversal of this defining feature of the party. Two: The other parties confidently expect that even with its looming implosion, the PDP will still rig the elections for the simple reason that it will use its incumbency and its control of the apparatus and the instruments of “legal” violence lodged in the armed forces to cow the opposition parties and the populace into submission. Against this, the opposition parties are readying themselves for a “final showdown”. Three: In neither of these two scenarios of the ruling party and the opposition parties respectively is the generality of the Nigerian masses, acting in their own interests, a factor of any real significance. Permit me to elaborate a little on this third feature of our conjuncture which, as I have observed, is, in my opinion, of far greater import than the other two features.

    The PDP, with its abysmally poor record in office, knows only too well that with the exception of a few places primarily in the South-south, it will never win nationwide on the basis of the popular support of the generality or plurality of the Nigerian masses. Furthermore, with its incumbency and its control of the apparatus and instruments of “legal” violence, the PDP is near absolute in sidelining the masses of Nigerians acting in their own interests. In contrast to this, the opposition parties are counting on the hope that the masses will not stand for another rigging of the elections and will rise up in revolt if the attempt is made once again by the PDP. However, in the meantime in the run-up to 2015, these opposition parties are doing little or nothing to prepare the Nigerian masses to intervene decisively in 2015 by taking up and fighting for their cause, their interests. In this, I think the opposition parties are putting their faith, their hope in the fact that every time that the ruling party has more or less imploded and brought the country to the edge of catastrophe, it has been the intervention of the Nigerian masses that has saved the day. In other words, one side, the side of the ruling party, has no place for the interests, the intervention of the masses of Nigerians across the length and breadth of the country; the other side, the side of the combined forces of the opposition parties, has only a very limited place for mass or popular intervention, this being on the day of judgment in 2015.

    As I reflect on these matters, my mind goes to an allegory in Shakespeare’s Coriolanus that is based on a fascinating analogy between the human body and the body politic. In this allegory which Shakespeare in fact borrowed from ancient Greek and Roman sources, all the other parts of the body – the head, the arms, the ears, the eyes and the tongue – stage a revolt against the belly on the bitter claim that, unlike each of these body parts that has a vital function for the health and well-being of the entirety of the body, the belly does nothing but simply consumes all the food that enters the body. In vain did the body protest that it does not merely consume everything that comes to it but actually processes all its intakes and converts them to nutrients that it then redistributes to all the other parts of the body. In their revolt, the other parts of the body withdraw from participation in transmitting food to the belly. Soon, however, they begin to wither, to atrophy because they find that each body part alone by itself cannot complete the cycle of consumption and redistribution that keeps all the parts of the body healthy and fit for performing their allotted functions.

    I have drawn attention to the fact that Shakespeare borrowed this allegory from ancient Greek and Roman sources. To this I must now add my feeling that Shakespeare’s Greek and Roman sources themselves were drawing on oral, popular sources that we find in almost every society and culture in the world in which a bloated stomach that is counterpoised to atrophied limbs is the ultimate mark of the diseased body, whether of the physical body or of the body politic. The kwashiorkor belly is of course the most grotesque mark of this kind of diseased body in which consumption has gone totally askew of redistribution. I don’t think I am overstating the case if I describe our current experiment in democratic governance since 1999 as a “kwashiorkor democracy” in which the collective belly of our political elites is a grotesque counterpoint to the shrunken, misshapen limbs of the masses of our peoples.

    Do I also overstate the facts if I say, ruefully, that most Nigerians in all parts of our country see nearly all our politicians and political parties in the image of the bloated belly that consumes everything and leaves nothing to the limbs, the other parts of the national body politic? The intervention of the masses of Nigerians across the length and breadth of the country is one of the few sources of hope for the country as we look ahead in anxiety and fear to 2015. For this hope to be realized, the work of preparing the masses for that intervention must begin now. Let us begin to see this not only in words but also in deeds, in policies and practices that make the crucial link between consumption and redistribution not a dream, not a fantasy on the horizon of the future but palpable realities in the lives of the vast majority of our peoples.

    Biodun Jeyifo

    bjeyifo@fas.harvard.edu

  • Associates reconcile Obasanjo, Daniel

    Associates reconcile Obasanjo, Daniel

    Friends and political associates of former Ogun State Governor Gbenga Daniel yesterday visited former President Olusegun Obasanjo in Abeokuta, the state capital, to reconcile the two Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) chieftains.

    Party sources said the delegation for the reconciliation was led by Senator Musiliu Obanikoro from Lagos State. In the team were five senators. But the former governor was not part of the entourage.

    Daniel is expected to visit Obasanjo at a later date, the sources added.

    It was learnt that the former President welcomed the reconciliation move, although he objected to the approach.

    “Baba Obasanjo said Daniel should have come to him without necessarily sending emissaries,” the sources said.

    Obasanjo and Daniel parted ways during the preparations for the 2011 governorship election over the choice of the PDP flag bearer for Ogun State. The former President supported Gen. Idowu Olurin (rtd) for the slot, but Daniel, who objected to his candidature, threw up Mr. Gboyega Isiaka, who later ran on the platform of the Peoples Party of Nigeria (PPN).

    The reconciliation visit trailed that of the PDP Board of Trustees (BoT) chairman, Chief Tony Anenih, on Monday.

    At yesterday’s meeting, Obanikoro, the former High Commissioner in Ghana, urged Obasanjo to forget the past and embrace Daniel, whom he described as his son.

    He hailed the former President’s contributions to the party as its former leader, as BoT chairman and National Leader.

    Obanikoro confirmed the visit on the phone, but declined comments on what transpired between the delegation and Obasanjo.

    He said: “We will not discuss our family meeting outside. Baba’s mood was good. He accorded us a warm reception. Don’t forget, he has been President twice and a military Head of State once. His mood was warm.”

     

  • Emotion as Anenih’s reconciliation team visits Obasanjo

    Emotion as Anenih’s reconciliation team visits Obasanjo

    The Board of Trustees (BoT) Chairman of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) yesterday led members of his reconciliation team on a visit to former President Olusegun Obasanjo.

    It was an emotional meeting at the Hilltop Mansion in Abeokuta home of the former President, who is believed to be the arrowhead of the aggrieved PDP chieftains in Ogun State. With Obasanjo were prominent members of the party who are opposed to the chairmanship of Chief Bayo Dayo, who was pronounced the authentic chairman by the National Chairman, Alhaji Bamanga Tukur.

    The PDP National Chairman said he took the step following the ruling of the court, which affirmed Dayo as the authentic leader.

    Anenih, according to sources, did not request Obasanjo to speak on his grievances against the party leadership because he was already aware of the factors that caused the crisis.

    The BoT chairman reportedly hailed Obasanjo for his contributions to the party and reiterated President Goodluck Jonathan’s respect for him as one of the prominent leaders and former President. The politician said the former President had been responsible for the advantageous position of the ruling party in the country, adding that he was an indispensable leader.

    According to the source, Anenih rejected the insinuation that the decisions taken by the PDP national leaders on the leadership tussle in the state was an attempt to injure Obasanjo.

    He said the party took certain steps in the overall interest of its members, based on the rule of law.

    The former Minister of Works urged the former President to not to do away with the baby he had nurtured to growth.

    The source added: “Anenih was in Abeokuta to pacify Baba and other aggrieved chieftains of the party in Ogun State. It was a closed-door meeting. The two leaders discussed party challenges and preparations for the next general elections. What happened was that Chief Anenih came to pacify the man because he was obviously aggrieved. Obasanjo spoke briefly as a party hero with patriotism. He assured the party leaders that he would remain committed to the growth of the PDP at all times.

    “The feeling at the meeting was that Obasanjo deserved respect in the party, based on his position as the former President and national leader. I think that he may be given some concessions, especially as they relate to the composition of the Southwest leadership of the party, after the caretaker committee has finished its assignment.”

    Anenih said he was in Abeokuta, the Ogun State capital, to discuss “issues affecting the corporate existence” of Nigeria with Obasanjo.

    Members of the BoT, including Jigawa State Governor Sule Lamido.

    But the BoT chairman said they deliberated on “issues affecting the security of the country”.

    He declined to give details of whether or not the meeting discussed the planned amnesty by the Federal Government for members of the Boko Haram sect or how to end the sect’s insurgency and killings.

    According to him, amnesty is a “security matter” that should not be discussed in the public.

    Anenih addressed reporters after his delegation held a meeting with the former President.

    It was learnt that yesterday’s meeting might have been a prelude to another peace meeting between Jonathan and Obasanjo. The source said both Dr. Jonathan and Obasanjo were not happy about the way the media have feasted on the lingering party crisis.

    Besides Anenih, others at the meeting, which reportedly lasted two hours, included Senator Abdulahi Adamu, Katsina State Governor Ibrahim Shema and Senator Mohammed Markafi.

    Others are: Senator Walid Jubril, Mrs Aduke Maina, former Ekiti State ‘Governor’ Segun Oni, the sacked National Auditor of the party, Chief Bode Mustapha, as well as Senator Dipo Odunjirin.

    Anenih also noted that the issues affecting the party were discussed, adding that he was satisfied with the outcome of his meeting with Obasanjo.