Tag: oil marketers

  • Oil marketers warn on looming fuel scarcity

    The Independent Petroleum Marketers Association of Nigeria (IPMAN) said it is concerned about the looming fuel scarcity due to non-availability of petroleum products at the depot.

    In a communiqué, the Chairman of IPMAN Ibadan Chapter, Alhaji Raheem Tayo, said the association was worried about the situation of fuel supply in Ibandan, Oyo State capital, which had persisted in spite of the intervention of Vice President Yemi Osinbajo.

    Tayo said the Federal Government  had made substantial re-investment through the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) to resurrect the Ibadan depot, which had been moribund for more than two years.

    According to him, the development culminated in the inauguration of the depot by the NNPC Group Managing Director, Dr. Maikanti Baru, last October 4.

    Tayo also said with the inauguration of the depot, followed massive pumping of petroleum products, mainly premium motor spirit (PMS) to the depot, which directly led to increased activity.

    Tayo said: “The loading of petroleum product was so well unhindered, thus wetting all the nooks and crannies of the depot’s jurisdiction of operation, which eventually led to cessation of fuel scarcity.

    “The primary factor that made the depot go under for some years was because of pipeline vandalism. Pipeline vandalism seems not to have been well taken care of as its resurgence becomes more daring thereby threatening another total closure of the depot with serious consequences to the supply of petroleum to the depot.

    “Loading activities, which was on the high side, progressively reduced on daily basis up until July 26, 2018 when loading activities stopped at the NNPC Ibadan depot.’’

  • EFCC arraigns oil marketers for alleged diversion, theft of N1.042billion

    An Ikeja high court heard Monday how two oil marketers, David Nwachukwu, Frank Okeke allegedly diverted N1.042billion meant for rentals accrued to a leasing company and haulage services of three companies for personal use.

    Nwachukwu and Okeke are facing a 14 count charges bordering on conspiracy, stealing contrary to section 409 and punishable under 281(1) of the Criminal Code Law of Lagos State 2011 preferred against them by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) before Justice Raliat Adebiyi.

    They were arraigned before the court alongside their companies, Haulage Oil and Gas and Franviok Limited.

    The defendants were also charged for retention of proceeds of criminal conduct contrary to Section 17 (b) of the EFCC (establishment) Act, 2004.

    Read Also:Oil marketers canvass for total deregulation of petroleum downstream sub-sector

    Led in evidence by the prosecuting counsel, Rotimi Oyedepo, a witness of the commission, Orji Chukwuma told the court that a petition, written by Leasing Company of Nigeria Limited  (now LECON financial Service Limited) over alleged diversion of funds was assigned to his team to investigate.

    He said, “Upon receiving the petition, a lot of investigations were carried out. We investigated staff of Total Plc, LECON, Bank of Industry. We recovered some documents such as internal memo. Some of the people we interrogated made statements. I came across one Bassy Effiong, we interviewed him on the product he sold.

    “We also invited OANDO in the cause of investigation and there was exchange of correspondents. Forte Oil, Eternal Plc also gave us their statement and the agreement between the Eternal Plc with the third defendant”, he added.

    Oyedepo asked the court to admit the documents in evidence.

    The court granted his request and admitted a letter dated March 27, 2015 written by Eternal Plc to the Head of Operation, EFCC and another written by Forte Oil to EFCC among other documents as exhibit p1 to p36.

    Justice Adebiyi subsequently adjourned further hearing till October 2, 2018.

    Nwachukwu,  Okeke and their companies were alleged to have sometimes between November 2011 and September 2014, with dishonest intent converted to their own use a total sum of N1,042,810, 463.54, which formed part of rentals accrued to Leasing Company of Nigeria Limited (now LECON financial Service Limited).

    The money, the anti-graft agency said was for the use of their truck to provide haulage services for Eternal Oil Plc, Lafarge Cement Wapco Nigeria Plc and also for the use of Mack Trucks in their fleets to provide haulage services for Total Nigeria Plc and Forte Oil Plc.

  • OPS, oil marketers fault PIGB on single regulator for petroleum industry

    The Organised Private Sector (OPS) and oil marketers have faulted the provision of a single regulator, the Nigerian Petroleum Regulatory Commission (NPRC), in the Petroleum Industry Governance Bill (PIGB) by the National Assembly.

    They spoke at a briefing in Lagos.

    While  the OPS was represented by the Chairman, Economic Policy Committee, the Manufacturers Association of Nigeria (MAN), Mr. Odiah Reginald Odiah, Major Oil Marketers Association of Nigeria (MOMAN) was represented by its Executive Secretary, Mr. Obafemi Olawore. The Depot and Petroleum Products Marketers Association of Nigeria (DAPPMAN) was represented by its Executive Secretary, Mr. Olufemi Adewole.

    The groups said they had carefully gone through the PIGB and noted that the provision of a single regulator would be counter-productive and keep Nigerians and the economy in same problems experienced in the industry.

    According to them, it has become imperative to point out the problems before the bill gets presidential assent. They also said they learnt that the Senate and the House of Representatives had harmonised their positions on it. To them, creating one regulator for the upstream and downstream sectors of the industry will make the regulator ineffective.

    The groups said: “We need the National Assembly to create two regulatory bodies or agencies that will be independent, one for the upstream and one the downstream. At the beginning of Nigeria’s oil industry, it was only one regulator that existed, the Department of Petroleum Resources, and it was not able to efficiently regulate the industry, hence the creation of the Petroleum Products Pricing Regulatory Agency (PPPRA) and the Petroleum Equalisation Fund (PEF).

    “Besides, upstream and downstream are completely different, but have petroleum in common. Upstream is relatively quiet even though the work there is enormous and has little to do with Nigerians domestically.

    “But in downstream, every Nigerian is involved either as consumer or petrol station owner, among others. Therefore, to have one regulator to supervise it will cause too much bureaucracy, tardiness and undue cumbersomeness in the oil and gas operations as witnessed currently.

    “We need two regulators that are effective, have speed, efficiency and the required staff to focus properly on each segment of the sector to tackle their responsibilities. Having one regulator will be detrimental to the economy. Therefore, we would like the National Assembly to look at the regulator aspect of the Bill again and involve all stakeholders.”

    While the marketers said they participated in the public hearing of the bill and recommended separate and independent regulators for the upstream and downstream of the industry, Odiah said MAN did not participate in the hearing because its members were not well informed about it; they only saw the passed bill. They also noted the importance of adding the various stakeholders as part of the regulatory bodies as having 100 per cent civil servants as in the regulatory bodies will amount to putting old wine in a new bottle.

  • OPS, oil marketers fault PIGB’s single regulator for petroleum industry

    •Seek separate independent regulators for upstream, downstream

    The Organised Private Sector (OPS) and oil marketers have faulted the provision of a single regulator, Nigerian Petroleum Regulatory Commission (NPRC) in the Petroleum Industry Governance Bill (PIGB) by the National Assembly.

    At joint press briefing in Lagos yesterday by the OPS represented by the Chairman, Economic Policy Committee, Manufacturers Association of Nigeria (MAN), Mr. Odiah Reginald Odiah, Major Oil Marketers Association of Nigeria (MOMAN) represented by its Executive Secretary, Mr. Obafemi Olawore and Depot and Petroleum Products Marketers Association of Nigeria (DAPPMAN) represented its Executive Secretary, Mr. Olufemi Adewole, the groups said they have carefully gone through the PIGB and noted the provision of a single regulator  in the Bill would be counter-productive and keep Nigerians and the economy in same problems we experience today in the oil and gas industry.

    According to them, it has become imperative to point out this problem before the Bill gets presidential assent as they learnt the Senate and the House of Representatives have harmonised their positions on it. To them, creating one regulator for the upstream and downstream sectors of the petroleum industry will be too big or humongous and the regulator will become ineffective.

    They said: “We need the National Assembly to create two regulatory bodies or agencies that will be independent, one for the upstream and one the downstream. At the beginning of Nigeria’s oil industry, it was only one regulator that existed, the Department of Petroleum Resources, and it was not able to properly and efficiently regulate the industry, hence the creation of the Petroleum Products Pricing Regulatory Agency (PPPRA) and the Petroleum Equalization Fund (PEF).

    “Besides, upstream and downstream are completely different but have petroleum in common. Upstream is relatively quiet even though the work there is enormous and has little to do with Nigerians domestically. But in downstream, every Nigerian is involved either as consumer or petrol station owner, among others. Therefore, to have one regulator to supervise it will cause too much bureaucracy, tardiness and undue cumbersomeness in the oil and gas operations as witnessed currently.

    “We need two regulators that are effective, have speed, efficiency and the required staff to focus properly on each segment of the sector to tackle their responsibilities. Having one regulator will be detrimental to the economy. Therefore, we would like the National Assembly to look at the regulator aspect of the Bill again and involve all stakeholders.”

    While the marketers said they participated in the public hearing of the Bill and recommended separate and independent regulator each for the upstream and downstream of the industry, Odiah noted that MAN didn’t participate in the public hearing because their members were not well informed about it but only saw the passed bill. Ever since we have been warning about the dangers of having one regulator for the industry, he added.

    They also noted the importance of adding the various stakeholders as part of the regulatory bodies as having 100 per cent civil servants as in the regulatory bodies will amount to putting old wine in a new bottle.

     

  • DPR digitalises oil marketers licensing process

    DPR digitalises oil marketers licensing process

    The Department of Petroleum Resource (DPR)  yesterday launched online license processing to checkmate illegal marketers responsible for diverting petroleum products and operating without genuine license.

    At a seminar organised for interaction and education of all independent patroleum marketers on online license processing in Kaduna, the Department said transiting from analogue license processing to digital is necessary, in order for petroleum marketers to do their businesses with ease.

    Speaking to reporters shortly after the event, the DPR Northwest Zonal Operations Controller, Alhaji Isa Tafida said with the introduction of online lincense processing, it will be easier for domestic investors to come in and do their business, and “whatever requirements is needed to be obtained for your organisation is there online.”

    He said the online processing will prevent physical contact between DPR officers and oil businessmen, adding that, “you don’t need to come to me or anybody and start begging to process your license; you can do that by opening your computer in your room and filling the required documents.”

  • $2b debts:  Oil marketers in trouble

    $2b debts: Oil marketers in trouble

    A $2b debt on the neck of oil marketers is causing jitters among oil workers and their bankers. Petroleum and Natural Gas Senior Staff Association of Nigeria (PENGASSAN), Major Oil Marketers Association of Nigeria (MOMAN), Independent Petroleum Marketers Association of Nigeria (IPMAN), Depot and Petroleum Products Marketers Association (DAPPMA)  and  Independent Petroleum Products Importers (IPPIs) want the Federal Government to save the day, writes EMEKA UGWUANYI

    PETROLEUM marketers are threatening to unleash a major massive sack in the oil industry.

    Issuing the threat are Major Oil Marketers Association of Nigeria (MOMAN), Independent Petroleum Marketers Association of Nigeria (IPMAN), Depot and Petroleum Products Marketers Association (DAPPMA) and Independent Petroleum Products Importers (IPPIs).

    Behind this threat is he over $2 billion debt hanging on marketers as a result of the Federal Government’s failure to pay for imported oil products.

    The Petroleum and Natural Gas Senior Staff Association of Nigeria (PENGASSAN) and others are also feeling the effect of the sad situation.

    PENGASSAN, in a recent statement, urged the Federal Government to settle all debts owed oil marketers to help the growth of the oil and gas industry and develop the economy.

    The union is worried by the threat of marketers to embark on massive retrenchment of their employees.

    National Public Relations Officer Fortune Obi said the debts were the outstanding subsidy owed on the importation of petroleum products, accrued interest on loans from banks and exchange rate differential.

    The union said the debts resulted in halt in the importation of refined petroleum products leaving only the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) doing the business.

    PENGASSAN said: “The government should try as much as possible to verify the authenticity of the claims by the oil marketers and ensure quick settlement of the genuine debts.

    “The government should try to separate the genuine claims by the importers from spurious ones and pay them because we will not like to be engulfed in the mistakes of the past where briefcase marketers milked the nation through dubious subsidy claims.

    “A situation where the workers in the industry bear the inability of the government to honour its obligations as part of the importation deal will be unfair and unacceptable to our Association. This is against the President Muhammadu Buhari’s administration major policy of job creation.

    “As a responsible trade union, as much as we will support any move by the government to end subsidy regime and spurious claims by the marketers, we are also canvassing for the payment of debts that can hinder the growth of the downstream sector and attract investments into the sector.”

    In the last five years, said the union, about 70 per cent of the workforce in the downstream sector, especially the marketing sub sector have been thrown into the labour market.

     

    Osinbajo’s effort to save the day

     

    Osinbajo, as acting president, summoned a meeting with the marketers on May 22.  Minister of Finance Mrs Kemi Adeosun, Minister of State for Petroleum Resources Dr. Ibe Kachikwu and the Central Bank Governor Godwin Emefiele attended. The meeting was on how to pay the debt.

    Osinbajo at the end of the meeting directed the Minister of Finance to within two weeks resolve the problem of the outstanding debt to them.

    MOMAN, IPMAN, DAPPMA and IPPIs, in a joint communiqué issued after  a recent meeting in Lagos signed by their legal adviser, Patrick Etim, explained the situation:  “The hope that the outstanding debt owed marketers will be paid resulting from the intervention of  the Vice President, Professor Yemi Osinbajo appear to be dashed as the payment that was promised to happen in July 2017 is yet to materialise.

    “This was devastating to marketers as we are being dragged daily by banks on debts owe and under threat of putting our tank farms under receivership”

    “It was expected that the various meetings held between very senior government officials and the leadership of the oil dealers to resolve the issue of the outstanding debt owed to oil marketers will yield the desired result as the figures were fully reconciled and there was commitment from government to pay by the end of July 2017.

    “However, Nigerian banks who are carrying the indebtedness of the marketers on their balance sheet have had their hope disappointed because as it stands now the payment of all the debts by the Federal Government have not been received and this has resulted to lot of problems between the banks and marketers.”

    The communiqué went on: “It was also agreed that after 45 days the government shall pay the interest charges on the loans taken by the marketers to finance the importation of cargoes of petrol. The interest payable due to delayed reimbursement also by the by the past administration, both of which the Federal Government had approved for payment to marketers, have not been fully settled by the appropriate Federal Government agencies.

    “The markers stated that it was only in the first quarter of 2017, that the banks were able to  liquidated the Letters of Credit from 2014/ 2015 at the N360/$ as against the N176- 195/$ at the time the LC’s were opened because of lack of foreign exchange from the government leaving their accounts with the huge differential.

    “The recent further devaluation of the naira from N195 to N305 and later to over N365 to S$1, while the Federal Government agencies based their reimbursement calculation on N197 to US$1, left petroleum marketers within our association with additional debt burden in excess of N600bn. This is in addition to the over N250bn arrears owed.

    “The downstream sector as a whole is now saddled with a debt burden of over N850bn which keeps rising because the banks are still charging interests until the total debt is fully liquidated.”

    The marketers said as a result of these unpaid interest and foreign exchange differentials have gradually become insolvent and financially handicapped to continue operating profitably.

    “Commercial banks, the original and actual owners of these funds are already hard hit by marketers’ inability to return these funds within the ‘contract tenure of 45 days’ and have, in line with the Central Bank of Nigeria’s prudential guidelines, the account of the marketers are now classified ‘non-performing’ accounts in all the banks in the federation. In addition, properties provided by marketers as securities for these funds are in the process of being auctioned.

    “We have indeed made several spirited efforts to get the government agencies involved to pay up fully, adhering to the principle of ‘full restitution’ to all participants in the then PMS import scheme but the major challenge on the economy has impeded complete success hence we, once more, making a direct appeal for the intervention of Mr. President.”

    The inability to pay or service the loans has not only stalled their further importation of fuel but is threatening the operation of the affected banks and the nation’s financial industry at large, they said

    They said it is very scary to consider consequences of bank failure in Nigeria, adding that apart from the impact on individuals and businesses some economists project that it would cost the government more than N2 trillion to revive Nigerian banks in the event of failure.

    They said that the banks are in a quandary on account of their financing importation of petrol cargoes by the petroleum marketers and so far, there is little evidence that the government has seen the risks in further delaying the payments under the subsidy scheme.

    “The banks are worried that financing new petrol imports when outstanding loans, interests and charges have not been paid will be foolish especially when it is clear that the imports will represent an unmitigated loss to the importers based on the landing costs.”

    While the oil marketers await the payment of monies owed to them as approved and announced by the Federal Executive Council (FEC), they are still unable to transact with banks because their accounts have been classified as non-performing hence cannot be used to transact business under the classification.

    The effect of this is that the operations of the marketers have been halted with backlog of staff salaries remaining unpaid for about eight months now.

    The workers themselves are in jeopardy of working without knowing when to get paid and losing their jobs.

    “There is a need for President Muhammadu Buhari’s government to keep improving governance especially by correcting wrongs of previous governments and making government responsible to its contracts and responsibilities.”

    The marketers are pleading with the government not to allow its inactions in handling the critical issues facing banks, airlines, manufacturers, electricity companies and other businesses expose consumers to suffering.

    The marketers have also expressed their support for Federal Government’s plan to remove fuel subsidy and they urged the government to quickly deregulate the downstream sector of the oil and gas industry to save the national economy from ruin.

  • Oil marketers cry out over $2b debts

    Oil marketers cry out over $2b debts

    •Thousands of jobs on the line •Banks reject requests

    Oil marketers are set to send thousands of workers away – unless the Federal Government pays its debts.

    The debts are owed on importation of petroleum products, accrued interest on loans from banks and exchange rate differential.

    Major Oil Marketers Association of Nigeria (MOMAN), Independent Petroleum Marketers Association of Nigeria (IPMAN), Depot and Petroleum Products Marketers Association (DAPPMA)  and  Independent Petroleum Products Importers (IPPIs), in a joint communiqué yesterday after a meeting in Lagos, said many marketers and oil companies were owing workers at least eight months salaries because the Federal Government failed to pay the huge debts owed since 2015.

    The communique, signed by their legal adviser, Patrick Etim, states that:

    • the hope that the debt will be paid in July, after Vice-President Yemi Osinbajo’s intervention appears to be dashed;
    • banks are threatening to put tank farms under receivership;
    • senior government officials and the leadership of the oil dealers have reconciled the figures and despite the government’s promise to pay, nothing has been done.

    “The condition of the contract being that the government shall pay the difference between the landing cost of the petrol and the selling price of petrol (as fixed by government) provided that the landing cost is higher than the selling price.

    “The government approved the landing cost, which fluctuated as it depended mainly on the international price of petrol and exchange rate of naira/dollar,” the marketers said, adding:

    “A key term of the government’s contract with marketers is that the under-recovery payments shall be paid to marketers within 45 days of submission of documents evidencing discharge of petrol cargo and trucking out from storage.

    “ It was also agreed that after 45 days, the government shall pay the interest charges on the loans taken by the marketers to finance the importation of cargoes of petrol.”

    The marketers said the problem of the banks is compounded by the fact that they provided billions of dollars to finance the importation of cargoes of petrol.

    The marketers said they opened Letters of Credit at approximate exchange rate of N197/$1 while petrol cargoes were supplied and sold at prices approved by the government and the repayment was calculated using the above exchange rate.

    The foreign exchange differentials, they said, arose as a result of the initial devaluation of the naira (by the last administration) from the initial N165/$1.

    The communique said: “The interest payable due to delayed reimbursement also by the the past administration, both of which the Federal Government had approved for payment to marketers, have not been fully settled by the appropriate Federal Government agencies.

    “It was only in the first quarter of 2017 that the banks were able to  liquidate the Letters of Credit from 2014/ 2015 at the N360/$1 as against the N176- N195/$1 at the time the LCs were opened because of lack of foreign exchange from the government, leaving their accounts with the huge differential.

    “The recent further devaluation of the naira from N195 to N305 and later to over N365 to $1, while the Federal Government agencies based their reimbursement calculation on N197 to $1, left petroleum marketers within our association with additional debt burden in excess of N600bn. This is in addition to the over N250bn arrears owed.

    “The downstream sector as a whole, is now saddled with a debt burden of over N850bn, which keeps rising because the banks are still charging interest until the total debt is fully liquidated.

    “Commercial banks, the original and actual owners of these funds, are already hard hit by marketers’ inability to return these funds within the ‘contract tenure of 45 days’ and have, in line with the Central Bank of Nigeria’s prudential guidelines, the account of the marketers are now classified ‘non-performing’ accounts in all the banks. In addition, properties provided by marketers as securities for these funds are in the process of being auctioned.

    “We have indeed made several spirited efforts to get the government agencies involved to pay up fully, adhering to the principle of ‘full restitution’ to all participants in the then PMS import scheme but the major challenge on the economy has impeded complete success, hence we, once more, are making a direct appeal for the intervention of Mr. President.”

    The marketers went on: “The banks are worried that financing new petrol imports when outstanding loans, interests and charges have not been paid will be foolish especially when it is clear that the imports will represent an unmitigated loss to the importers based on the landing costs.”

    The oil marketers are unable to transact new business with banks because their accounts have been classified as non-performing.

    The effect of this is that the operations of the marketers have been halted.

    “There is a need for President Muhammadu Buhari’s government to keep improving governance, especially by correcting wrongs of previous governments and making government responsible to its contracts and responsibilities,” the marketers said.

    They urged the government not to allow its inactions in handling the critical issues facing banks, airlines, manufacturers, electricity companies and other businesses expose consumers to suffering.

    The marketers expressed their support for Federal Government’s plan to remove fuel subsidy and urged the government to deregulate the downstream sector of the oil and gas industry to save the economy from collapse.

  • Aviation unions disrupt Arik Air operations 

    Aviation unions disrupt Arik Air operations 

    … As management vows to take measures against illegal interference

     

     

    Three aviation unions comprising of United Labour Congress (ULC), National Union of Air Transport Employees (NUATE), Air Transport Services Senior Staff Association of Nigeria (ATSSSAN) and National Association of Aircraft Pilots and Engineers (NAAPE) on Thursday disrupted the operations of Arik Air.

    The union members arrived the headquarters of the airline as early as 4.00 am to literally to ground the operations of the airline.

    The union members carried out the picketing exercise despite   heavy police presence barricading entrance into the headquarters of the airline.

    A source hinted that under the instruction of the United Labour Congress, oil marketers were directed not to supply Jet A1 (Aviation fuel) to the airline as part of measures to press home their demands.

    The unions are picketing operations of the troubled Arik Air over the failure of the airline’s management to re-instate sacked union leaders and several other issues in the airline.

    Meanwhile, new management of Arik Air has threatened to take every legal measure at its disposal to stop any illegal interference on its operations.

    The new management of Arik Air while condemning the picketing of the airline, by the National Union of Air Transport Employees (NUATE),  Air Transport Services Senior Staff Association of Nigeria (ATSSSAN) and  National Association of Aircraft Pilot and Engineers (NAAPE),   described it as illegal.

    A statement by the media consultant to the Asset Management Corporation of Nigeria, AMCON on Arik Air, Simon Tumba stated that the motive of the picketing is unclear to management as the action of the unions is illegal.

    In his words: “It has come to the attention of the Arik Management, (under Receivership), that the Lagos State branch of National Union of Air Transport Employees  (NUATE),  Air Transport Services Senior Staff Association of Nigeria (ATSSSAN) and  National Association of Aircraft Pilot and Engineers (NAAPE)  has directed their members to picket Arik airline.

    We hasten to say that the motive of this picketing is unclear to Management and their action is therefore illegal”.

    Tumba explained further that: “It is a well-known fact that Arik is under Receivership following various challenges experienced over the last few years, which include delays and cancellations of flights, delays in payment of salaries and huge debts to trade creditors and suppliers, bad corporate governance and a host of others”.

    According to Tumba “In exercise of its statutory powers under the Asset Management Corporation of Nigeria (AMCON) act a Receiver was appointed over the affairs of Arik Air on February 6, 2017. With the assistance of AMCON, salaries are being paid including backlogs, on time performance has improved from 15 percent to average of 80percent and fuel suppliers that hitherto quit doing business with Arik are happily doing business with the airline.

    “For the record, the management had engaged with its staff and is convinced that there is no reason to picket our airline, which is facing challenging times.

    “The focus of the Arik Air management is to stabilise the operations of the airline and enhance its ability to play a positive role in Nigeria’s aviation industry. Therefore the Management of the airline advises the unions to steer clear from undermining the operations of Arik Air. Management would take every legal measure at its disposal to stop any illegal interference with its operations.”

     

     

  • ‘Why oil marketers ‘re not getting forex’

    ‘Why oil marketers ‘re not getting forex’

    • Fuel importation stops 2019

    The Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) has explained the difficulty in getting foreign exchange by petroleum products dealers.

    According to the apex bank, the progressive decline in the amount of forex available to the CBN made it difficult to meet the demands of fuel marketers.

    Its Deputy Governor, Sarah Alade, who represented the CBN governor, Godwin Emefiele told the House of Representatives  Ad hoc committee on the Reduction of Petrol Prices headed by Hon. Nnanna Igbokwe, that things “ are not the way it used to be.”

    She said:  “There is shortage of forex. Between 2013 and  2014, the Federal Government used to get between $2 billion and $3 billion monthly and the CBN in the interbank sells about 30 per cent of that. 70 per cent come from the foreign investors.

    “Today, we get between $600 million and $700 million. Nothing comes in from interbank. $1. 5 million is sold everyday and $1 billion is done in December to clear matured letters of credit. It’s not the way it used to be.”

    On why International Oil Companies (IOCs) were selling forex to marketers directly, Minister  of State for Petroleum Resources,, Ibe Kachikwu told the committee that there was arrangement made to ease the forex scarcity being experienced by importers who collect between 35 to 40 per cent of the forex in the CBN.

    He said it was an “intervention scheme,” which he said has not changed since the minister started it with the IOCs. According to him. A cross functional team made up of Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC), CBN,  Petroleum Products Prices Regulatory Agency (PPPRA) was formed and “applications came from marketers for forex. They’re screened against a set of criteria.”

    He said the only solution to the lingering forex/fuel problem is the full utilisation of the local refineries.

    The minister said within two years, the Federal Government revived non-functional refineries to contribute about eight million out of over 20 million litres of petrol consumed in the country daily.

    Kachikwu said the country would be able to stop importation of fuel by 2019. According to him the Federal Government attracted foreign investors to partner with the NNPC by initiating a model to repair the country’s refineries within two years.

    He said: “This has consistently served as a target for this government so that by 2018 December, NNPC must be able to deliver on some of the terms given them, one of which is to reduce petroleum importation by 60 per cent.

    “By 2019 we should be able to exit completely the importation of petroleum products in this country.”

  • $1b debt: Save us, oil marketers beg Fed Govt

    $1b debt: Save us, oil marketers beg Fed Govt

    Independent Petroleum Products Importers (IPPIs) yesterday raised the alarm over their $1billion indebtedness to banks as a result of the Federal Government’s failure to pay them for fuel imported into the country.
    The oil marketers include members of Major Oil Marketers of Nigeria (MOMAN), Independent Petroleum Marketers Association of Nigeria (IPMAN) and Depot and Petroleum Products Marketers Association (DAPPMA).
    A N160billion interest has accrued on this debt, the marketers said.
    A communiqué in Lagos by their legal adviser, Patrick Etim, said the inability to pay or service the loans had stalled further importation and “is threatening the operation of the affected banks and the nation’s financial industry”.
    Many of their members, the communiqué said, have begun to close shop due to the debt.
    The government’s debt, according to the communique, arose from Petrol Subsidy Scheme, which saw the Federal Government entering into a contract with IPPIs to import and supply petrol to the market on the condition that it would refund the difference between the landing cost and the selling price of petrol.
    The government approved the landing cost, which fluctuated as it depended mainly on the international price of petrol and exchange rate of naira/dollar.
    “A key term of the government’s contract with IPPIs is that the subsidy payments shall be paid to IPPIs within 45days of discharge of petrol cargo. It was also agreed that after 45 days the government shall pay the interest charges on the loans taken by the IPPIs to finance the importation of cargoes of petrol. The outstanding interest payments owed to IPPIs is currently over N160 billion,” it added.
    The communiqué added: “Petrol cargoes were supplied and sold by the IPPIs at the selling prices approved and subsidised by government and the subsidy payments were calculated using the above exchange rate. Now at the beginning of 2017, the banks have not liquidated the Letters of Credit from 2014 because of lack of foreign exchange from the government.  The outstanding mature Letters of Credit are currently over $1billion. The Nigerian banks involved and the entire Nigerian banking system is at risk on account of these transactions.
    ”The banks are in a quandary on account of their financing importation of petrol cargoes by the IPPIs and so far, there is little evidence that the government has seen the risks in further delaying the payments under the subsidy scheme.  The exposed situation of the banks is exacerbated by the current trends in the petrol market. When the fixed pump selling price of petrol was increased from N97.00 to N145 per litre in May 2016, it was based on an exchange rate of N285/$1.00 resulting in a 45 per cent increase.  On June 20, 2016 the naira was devalued from N285/$1.00 to N305/$1.00 which is an increase of seven per cent but the fixed pump selling price of petrol has not been increased. This means that petrol must be subsidised.
    “The banks are worried that financing new petrol imports when outstanding loans, interests and charges have not been paid will be foolish especially when it is clear that the imports will represent an unmitigated loss to the importers based on the landing costs.
    “The IPPIs claims arise largely from importation of petroleum cargoes authorised by President Jonathan’s government under the Petrol Subsidy Scheme. Government is a continuum, therefore, the contracts of the President Jonathan government with the IPPIs will remain binding on successive governments. There is a need for President Muhammadu Buhari’s government to keep improving governance especially by correcting wrongs of previous governments and making government responsible to its contracts and responsibilities.
    ”Government through the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) has initiated Intervention Programmes for strategic sectors, such as agriculture, manufacturing, petroleum products importation, and aviation. The CBN’s intervention programmes are primarily to stimulate growth in Nigeria’s foreign exchange (forex) earning capacity, and to prevent collapse of the banking system due to the huge exposure of the banks. The CBN has also offered foreign exchange to IPPIs under a special window aimed at liquidating outstanding matured Letters of Credit at an exchange rate of N305/$1.00. However, the exchange rate of N197/$1.00 when Letters of Credit were initially opened for IPPIs and transactions concluded and the current CBN offer rate of N305/$1.00 is an increase of 55 per cent and a significant rate differential.
    “This means that for every 15,000MT of petrol imported by the IPPIs at a rate of $500 per MT and whose foreign exchange differential claims has not been paid then it means that the cargo of 15,000MT imported at the N197/$1.00 rate will now be given foreign exchange at the rate of N305/$1.00 by implication a cargo of 15,000MT at $500 per MT is S$7,500,000 or N1,477,500,000 at N197/US$1.00 rate or N2,287,500,000 at N305/US$1.00 rate. If these outstanding payments to IPPIs are made at N305/$1.00 they would suffer a loss of N810,000,000 per 15,000MT cargo of petrol. Government’s delay in paying debts to IPPIs and the difficulty they face in procuring forex at equitable rates will likely see the extinction of many of the IPPIs in 2017 thereby creating petroleum products shortages and attendant insecurity.
    “The inability of the banks to receive repayments of their outstanding loans to IPPIs means they are hampered from providing loans for future petrol imports and even to other sectors of the economy. it is very scary to consider consequences of bank failure in Nigeria. Apart from the impact on individuals and businesses some economists project that it would cost the government more than N2 trillion to revive Nigerian banks in the event of failure. The sums owed to banks by the IPPIs and aviation operators threaten the safety of these banks and the government must take timely action.”
    The marketers praised Buhari’s war against corruption, improvement of electricity supply, and sufficient fuel supply.