Tag: Ojukwu

  • Ojukwu would have joined APC — Okorocha

    Ojukwu would have joined APC — Okorocha

    Governor Rochas Okorocha, the host of the rally, spoke to select newspapers on why he dumped PDP, APGA leadership crisis, why he chose to join APC and the prospects of the mega party in the South-East zone. The Nation was there.

     

    At the beginning, when the APC was to be formed, there was the fear among some South-East leaders that the interest of the zone may not be fully protected in the new party. What is the merger deal and why are you so sure Ndigbo would be better secured politically under APC?

    The APC in the South-East is a done deal. I said so because the South-East has not had it good in PDP. The South-East is looking for a political party that will have a say as to what happens at the national level. Today, the South-East has no say at all as to what happens at the national PDP, because any time in any political party or setting, a particular zone does not produce the president, the vice president, the speaker, the senate president, and is not the chairman of the ruling party, then any other thing you’re talking about does not give them any good representation.

    But for the South-East, they’re better off in APC. APC came as a result of failure of PDP. There wouldn’t have been any APC if PDP was doing well as a party. So, Nigerians are yearning for a change, something that can provide them an alternative hope due to the failure of PDP, especially in the South-East. If you look at the history of South-East since the inception of PDP, there is nothing to show as a PDP zone, nothing, absolutely nothing.

    Today, the issue of the Niger Bridge is still a political discourse. The road from Enugu to Port Harcourt, a very simple thing to do, is still an issue of politics. So, the South-East is worst off with PDP, and APC is indeed their best alternative, their very best alternative. And I can assure you that every South-Easterner, majority of people in the South-East will be in APC, except for those who have made politics a business, and who have always enjoyed the patronage of PDP. Such people may still be found hanging around PDP. But in the real sense, the ordinary person in the states of South-East will be in APC.

    Talking about the issue of APGA, it has been… APGA to me is not a political party. APGA is just like a cultural thing for Ndigbo; it’s not really a political party. You cannot say that APGA controls the South-East, no! South-East is being controlled by PDP. So, this notion that APGA is a South-East party does not really arise. It’s only with my emergence as a governor now that we began to give APGA that sense of an Igbo party thing.

    If you look at it critically, you’ll agree with me that APGA is still a minority even in the South-East. People are comparing APGA with ACN that controls the South-West; that’s called a regional party. A party becomes regional when it is in total control of the region where it operates. I was in PDP. I didn’t come under PDP because I know their failure of internal democracy would not guaranty me a free and fair election on primaries.

    But for us, APGA is like an identity for Ndigbo. It’s like a way of life, so it’s not a bad thing. It is rather a thing that belongs to us, that’s why I say to people that every Igbo man in any other political party is in APGA; every PDP member is an APGA man; every APC member is an APGA man. APGA is not therefore a party per se, but it’s like a fallback thing for Ndigbo, assuming politics is not played the way it ought to be played nationally.

    But for now, we should not allow ourselves to miss this opportunity, where you have the South-West that has the control of their zone giving up their identity of ACN; CPC giving up their identity; ANPP giving up theirs in a merger, not in a coalition, not in an alliance to form a brand new party to challenge PDP, and APGA will say it will not join, what will you be after the merger? You become so inconsequential that you either have to go and chose with PDP.

    The question remains all these our marriage and alliance with PDP, how have we faired? There is nothing APGA can show for their support for PDP in the last election, absolutely nothing. I will not deceive Ndigbo. For me, I’m not ready to deceive Igbos; I must take them to the right place.

    We must have a party that cuts across the length and breadth of the entire nation. Why will I be in a party that I cannot have a say in what happens in the North or South-West or South-South simply because I find myself in the South-East?

    I want to go to Maiduguri and see my party members receiving me in their local angle, go to my place, the same thing applicable. I don’t want to be a 100% shareholder of a N1000 business. I’m the Chief Executive of N1000 company. I want to be a one percent shareholder of $1 billion business, even if I’m just an ordinary member. So, we’re looking at the bigger picture for our people. I hate to sound like a sectional or tribal leader, because having being born in the North, having being an Igbo man brought up in the North, and having being empowered by the West, Nigeria remains my constituency. So, I’m looking at the bigger picture.

    There is this fear that APC is a party owned by Senator Bola Ahmed Tinubu. Will it be healthy to give up everything and join such a party?

    ACN could be described by critics as Tinubu’s party but not APC at all. Some people have also said it is Buhari’s party; it’s not anybody’s party; it’s a Nigerian party. APC is a Nigerian party, and to what advantage will Tinubu make out of it? What advantage will Buhari make out of it? How are you sure they’re even running for the president of the Federal Republic of Nigeria? If they do, they’re Nigerians.

     

    Does APGA still exist?

    The party exists with Victor Umeh as the National Chairman. The party cannot just fold its maps and join the APC because we still have issues in court, but I’m optimistic that once these matters are all over, we will come to the round table, discuss about the full merger with other parties. I don’t think APGA will like to be a very tiny party in Nigeria that cannot even guaranty itself a state, and it is not ready for that. But because of the issue in court, and that is why I think that it is not proper for APGA to submit their certificate now. Since I’m there already as the APGA APC, that is good enough.

     

    So can you conveniently say Imo is now an APGA state?

    Imo is an APGA state until the merger is consummated. Once the merger is consummated, then we’ll be in the APGA APC as far as this state is concerned.

    I also know we are not in disagreement with the national leadership of APGA. Umeh remains the chairman of APGA as far I am concerned, but I am saying that there is a better picture for us that will benefit our people and you will see that the moment we conclude this court case.

    But some are alleged to have been planted by the Presidency to ensure APGA becomes an annex of the PDP…

    For PDP, they want to annex APGA, really really, but I can’t be annexed by the PDP. So, I’m telling you that in the last election, there was what is called alliance with the PDP for presidential election. We did, especially in my state, it was people like us that guaranteed victory for PDP in the presidential election. It wasn’t the PDP governorship candidate then, no. It was people like us that had the magic that brought about that victory. We’re saying that we need a better thing; this is all about politics really.

     

    When you said that APGA is the minority in the South-East, controlling two states, the PDP see it the other way round; they see those two states as very strategic…

    When you talk about APGA as a party, it is a minority party. But if you ask APGA as an Igbo thing, then I’ll tell you that everybody is APGA. I think I made that point clear. So, there is different APGA, when you bring the term APGA. Let me shock you that if Ojukwu is alive, he would have been the first person to join this merger, because if you remember his relationship with Buhari and the rest of them at the time of ANPP, Ojukwu was the chairman of Board of Trustees of ANPP. So, he would have been glad to join this. I’m sure he wouldn’t have joined the PDP. I think we’re doing what Ojukwu would have done if he is alive today.

     

    In 1998 you were denied the ticket, do you have any regret that if you were allowed then you would done better?

    If I say I have regrets, I would be questioning my creator and I don’t want to do that. But there is nothing now in this my head that I didnt know as at that time. I have been consistent with my policies. If you remember as far back as 1998, I have been talking about Rochanomic; Rochas’ economic theory. The four tier system of government is there, decentralization was there. I had all these things lined up. So, there’s nothing that I am doing now that I wouldn’t have done then. That is why when I came into government, it did not take me one hour to key in, in fact I stated working on the 28th of May before my swearing-in. And since that day, there has not been a one hour break. Because I knew what to do from the onset. So I am not in this to learn. If not how could I have come up with a thousand projects in two years. It is unprecedented in the history of mankind.

    The truth is that what this government has done within this period has not been done in the history of Imo State in the past 30 years. What is happening here can only be the handwork of God.

    Some of us are not in this business to look for money. We want to use what we have to give to the system. Then, when I wanted to be governor they refused me so I went and picked a party, APGA, and won the election. If I had run under PDP one million times and the whole people wanted me, I would have lost.

    PDP has this characters that do not produce for Nigeria the much needed leaders but politicians who are not thinking of the next generation but the next election, that is my grouse with the PDP.

    The only election I won before this one was when PDP had no hand in it, when Abacha conducted the elections for constitutional conference. PDP has this kind of trend that if you are independent minded or have a mind of your own, then PDP will not allow you to have political power. Unless they feel you are a dummy that could be controlled and that is not what will bring progress. Until they change from that, they cannot move this nation forward.

     

    If your mother had been alive, would be doing things the same way you are doing it?

    Oh my God! Today when somebody mentioned that, I wept. If my mother had been there, that would have been a different story because she was indeed an inspiration but all the same, for whatever she is not there for, my wife quickly jumped into the shoes, providing motherly care and encouragement because sometimes it is not easy to run a government, sometimes you get pissed off by people’s attitudes, at times you feel like taking a walk out of the whole system. You ask yourself what is even there for you but somebody is there to pat your back and say listen, ‘you are on a divine mission.’

    Will you seek reelection in 2015 or are going to …?

    2015! I tell you, I have not decided. But I’ll soon make a decision, but definitely, I will run for an election.

     

    Was there a pact that you will do one term?

    No, there was never a pact. But it has always been my desire to serve in Imo State for one term, even now, I desire to do a term. But that is where I need help and prayers because here, I might take a risk of being lynched if I say I am not going to continue, unless I do something to make them hate me, but now it would be difficult to get out of that entanglement.

    And again remember, I have always run for president and it has always been my desire to be the president of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, to give that which is inside me which would bring about the development of the country. So, these things are conflicting at the moment so I would simply wait and see.

     

     

  • Ojukwu, Maxi Okwu, APGA saga: Time to think well

    Ojukwu, Maxi Okwu, APGA saga: Time to think well

    The recent comments by Chief Maxi Okwu, a politician and lawyer, on the deceased Igbo sage and nationalist, Chief Chukwuemeka Odumegwu-Ojukwu, in conjunction with the ruling of the Court of Appeal, Enugu Division, on the national chairmanship of APGA and sundry issues should elicit reactions and rejoinders by well-informed and right-thinking citizens. This is especially so given the position of Okwu as a politician who was once the National Chairman of the Conference of Political Parties (CPP) and a legal practitioner of more than 30 years standing.

    It is, to say the least, unfortunate for Okwu to dismiss the symbol, spirit and personification of Igbo nationalism in Nigeria, Chief Ojukwu, as an extremist and someone who should not be taken seriously. Chief Ojukwu is a nationalist. He was among the first breed of well-trained Nigerian graduates who went to school abroad. Ojukwu attended the best schools and crowned it all with the Oxford University, where he bagged a degree in History. He returned to Nigeria and served as an Administrative Officer and later as the Divisional Officer, Udi Division. Thereafter, he left for the Army, where he attended several courses in the United Kingdom. He returned to the country and served as an instructor, soldier and military governor of the then Eastern Region.

    A man with this pedigree cannot be dismissed with a wave of the hand. Till date, Chief Ojukwu remains one of the greatest Nigerians and one of the greatest Igbos this country has ever produced. Ojukwu’s resort to war was not a personal decision. It was a collective decision of all Igbos. Perhaps Chief Okwu was then a toddler, otherwise he would have appreciated that Ojukwu’s decision was only ineluctable, it was also the collective and general wish of the people then, given the intensity of the pogrom, mindless slaughter of Igbos by their compatriots in the northern parts of the country then.

    Politicians should not play politics with the events leading to the civil war. It is something of a heresy for an Igboman to open his mouth to condemn Ojukwu for his role in the build-up to the war itself. This is a man who left the pleasure and luxury of his father’s wealth to lead his people to self defence, to counter a premeditated genocide. In the course of the war, his father’s wealth vanished. His father’s properties were labelled as abandoned properties and confiscated by the federal government. He went to exile for 12 years and suffered loss, inconvenience and deprivation because of his palpable and undiluted love for his people.

    It is great disservice to the Igbo nation for Okwu to pour invectives, vituperations and diatribe on Ojukwu. By his useless comments, Okwu has exposed his little knowledge of the sage, Chief Ojukwu, and his assured place in the pantheon of Nigeria heroes. It will not be too hard to charge Okwu with the betrayal of the Igbos. In some settings, Okwu would have been declared a persona-non grata for being completely unreasonable to calumniate the person and personality of a legend like Chief Ojukwu. Ndigbo will resist any attempt by some ill- informed and myiopic political mercenaries and self-seeking opportunists to use the name of our leader to advance personal interests. Clearly, Okwu is the first Igbo man to have made such senseless comments on Chief Ojukwu since his death. Okwu’s argument is totally un-Igbo.

    The same Okwu,also went off the mark when he referred to the ruling/decision of the Court of Appeal, Enugu Division, reinstating Chief Victor Umeh as APGA National Chairman, as futile.

    It is easy to read Okwu’s mind. After all, he was the one who was handpicked from nowhere and paraded by a few court jesters as the Interim National Chairman of APGA.

    Chief Okwu purports that the decision of the Court of Appeal is meaningless because the act had been done. This is the height of intellectual laziness. It will be recalled that after the judgment of the Enugu High Court, Chief Victor Umeh, as a faithful believer in due process and an unrepentant apostle of the creed of rule of law, appealed against the judgment and filed applications for stay of execution in the High Court and the Court of Appeal.

    But because they wanted to be smart and they wanted to overtake the applications for stay and render the appeal nugatory, these smart-less political tin-gods proceeded to organise a Kangaroo congress in which, among other things, Okwu was purportedly appointed Interim National Chairman of APGA. Even Okwu, who, as a lawyer, is supposed to know that the whole charade was unconstitutional and an illegality, also joined in the illegal act.

    Any wonder, then, that Okwu is crying foul. He and his co-travellers were aware of the appeal. They knew about the motions for stay of execution, yet, they went ahead to give themselves what they considered to be vacant jobs in APGA. The beauty of the rule of law is that it exposes the lawless and vindicates those who are law-abiding. Of course, Okwu should know that he and his confederates can not benefit from their illegal actions.

    Okwu cannot be heard to write off the ruling of the Court of Appeal that the action had been completed because they knew that the appeal and applications were pending when they attempted to foist a situation of complete helplessness or fait accompli on the court. Naturally, the court has the power to call their bluff and return all the parties to the status quo ante bellum.

    It is sad that Okwu allowed himself to be used to advance the cause of the dissidents in APGA. Come to think of it, Okwu had never been an APGA member. He has no registration card. His name is not in his ward’s register. He was simply brought from nowhere and clothed with the oversize dress and shoes of APGA National Chairman. Dressed in this borrowed robe but now undressed by the Court of Appeal ruling, Okwu is only lifting his head on the brick wall. Those who used him will surely be smiling by now because they knew the futility of their actions but merely wanted to take a chance just to throw dust into a clear sky.

    Needless to say that politicians who swim in murky waters are to be dirty. Politicians who throw dust in the political arena are most likely to be blurred by the dust raised by them. Chief Okwu dabbled into the APGA political waters but he has now been swept away and aside, even as pundits contend that he is a politician who likes to benefit from political turmoils.

    Finally, some cautionary words for Okwu: Leave Chief Ojukwu alone to rest in peace because he had accomplished his work here on earth. Think about due process and rule of law in the unfolding events in APGA.

    – Okpala, a political analyst, wrote in from Enugu

  • Retract outburst against Ojukwu, Okwu told

    A chieftain and founding member of All Progressives Grand Alliance (APGA), Chief Onwuka Ukwa, has joined in condemning the factional chairman of the party, Chief Maxi Okwu, for describing late Chukwuemeka Ojukwu as an extremist.

    He advised Okwu to quickly retract that statement in his own political interest as any unpleasant statement on the late Ojukwu was a direct attack on the entire Igbo race.

    But Okwu had since denied making such statement.

    Ukwa told reporters in Enugu that it was a serious concern to the party that Okwu should describe “our hero and leader as an extremist because I don’t know how Ojukwu’s defence of Ndigbo shuold be termed as extremism.”

    Ukwa expressed disappointment in Okwu for making such statement against “the man that stood against the extinction of Ndigbo, including Maxi and members of his family.”

    The APGA chieftain said: “Calling Ojukwu, the late APGA leader, an extremist for fighting for the rights of Igbo people and common man is not only an insult but humiliating to our departed hero and leader. He even announced a policy departure from what he termed Ojukwu’s extreme policy views.”

    Ukwa also commented on the convention that produced Okwu as the chairman of APGA, describing it as “an unholy cult meeting organised by Governor Peter Obi and christened APGA convention.”

    “If Dim Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu had been alive, I wonder if he would have been asked to sneak into the venue in darkness, as a midnight bandit, to attend a convention,” he queried.

    Positing that the Appeal Court judgment had set aside the midnight convention, Ukwa firmly asserted that “the law is that today, Chief Victor Umeh is the APGA National Chairman.”

    He also chided Okwu for saying that the Appeal Court ruling was futile and not binding on him, regretting that “the call by a member of the bar for disobedience of the pronouncement of the Court of Appeal for political expediency is a bit troubling.”

    He added: “A show of disrespect towards the judiciary as an institution by a member of the bar is a very poor political behavior.”

     

  • Ojukwu’s firm gives condition for peace

    A firm, Ojukwu Transport Limited, yesterday said it could re-file the three suits it withdrew last week, if its condition for an out-of-court settlement is not met.

    The suits were filed against the widow of the late Ikemba Nnewi, Dim Chukwuemeka Odumegwu-Ojukwu, Bianca and others at the Lagos State High Court, Igbosere.

    The company sued for some property located in Ikoyi.

    The houses, situated at 29 Oyinkan Abayomi Drive (formerly Queens Drive), Ikoyi, and at 13, Ojora Road (Hawksworth Road), Ikoyi, are said to generate N80 million in rent yearly, according to the former claimant.

    There were indications that the family preferred an out-of-court settlement in the issue of the late Ojukwu’s Will, and in resolving disputes on the management of the property.

    However, a suit filed by two of Ojukwu’s children, Afamefuna and Nwachukwu, against Ojukwu Transport and seven others is still pending before Justice Funmilayo Atilade.

    The claimants, who sued through their mother, Bianca, are seeking a declaration that they are entitled to possess and occupy 29, Oyinkan Abayomi Drive, Ikoyi.

    According to them, they will maintain tenure until the harmonisation of the management and administration of Ojukwu Transport’s assets.

    They also asked the court to declare that an alleged threat to forcefully eject them from the property is illegal.

    But the defendants denied this claim.

    The children urged the court to hold that they are also entitled to possession of the property on 13, Hawksworth Road, Ikoyi (now 13, Ojora Road, Ikoyi); 32A Commercial Avenue, Yaba; 30, Gerard Road, Ikoyi and 4, Macpherson Avenue, Ikoyi.

    In an interview with The Nation yesterday, a Director of Ojukwu Transport, Dr Ike Ojukwu, gave conditions for an out-of-court settlement.

    He said the firm’s lead counsel, George Uwechue (SAN), would make the final decision on whether the suits would be re-filed.

    He said: “Obviously, you know that Uwechue would make the final decision.

    “With regards to peace, peace is good, but peace basically means that people who have our property render account, return the property and refund the money. That’s what it means basically.

    “As you know, in these things, anybody’s lawyer can call us.

    “But if there is no evidence of what I have listed to you, then the cases shall be re-filed.

    “I think Emeka Ojukwu (Jnr) granted an interview in the papers last week where he said he wants out-of-court settlement.

    “It was all over the place, but sometimes one can say one thing and the headlines won’t reflect it.

    “However, there is always hope for peace, especially during the Easter period and with what Emeka Ojukwu (Jnr) reportedly said.

    “But let me just say this to you very clearly, that the family is not against peaceful resolution of the dispute.

    “However, peaceful resolution means that they give account, return the property and refund the money.”

  • Ojukwu’s firm withdraws suit against Bianca over Lagos properties

    A company, Ojukwu Transport Limited, yesterday withdrew three suits it filed against the widow of the late Ikemba Nnewi, Dim Chukwuemeka Odumegwu-Ojukwu , Bianca and others at the Lagos State High Court, Igbosere.

    The company sued for some properties located in Ikoyi. The houses, situated at 29 Oyinkan Abayomi Drive (formerly Queens Drive), Ikoyi, and at 13, Ojora Road (Hawksworth Road), Ikoyi, are said to generate N80 million in rent yearly, according to the claimant.

    During yesterday’s proceedings, the claimant, through its lawyer, Ikechukwu Ubahakwe, told the court, presided over by Justice Adedayo Oyebanji, of its intention to withdraw the suits.

    Counsel to Mrs Odumegwu-Ojukwu, Nick Omeye, did not object to the application.

    He, however, prayed the court to award N100, 000 as cost against the claimant.

    The lawyer said Mrs Odumegwu-Ojukwu, being a public figure, had been derided in newspapers when the suit was filed.

    “Considering the status of the defendant, I ask for N100, 000 against the claimant.

    “The claimant got to know of the suit while she was in Spain as an ambassador.

    “Most national newspapers carried the story when the suit was filed,’’ he said.

    Justice Oyebanji awarded N5, 000 against the claimant.

    She refused to award cost in the other suits since the defendants were unknown persons.

    “This suit is hereby struck out,” the judge ruled.

    The judge granted the claimant’s request to strike out two other suits against unknown persons occupying two properties of the firm.

    The claimant sued Ambassador Odumegwu-Ojukwu for herself and on behalf of any other person who claims to be in possession of 29, Oyinkan Abayomi Drive.

    The defendant in the second suit over the property at 13, Ojora Road was not specified in the statement of claim.

    The claimant said the properties were earlier occupied by the late Odumegwu-Ojukwu before he relocated to Enugu, 10 years ago.

    According to the claimant, the late war lord handed them over to the company to manage by power of attorney.

    It claimed that it was losing N40 million per annum on each of the houses because the occupants allegedly failed to pay rent or give up possession.

    The company asked to take over the properties and demanded a payment of N80 million being expected value of the two houses from September 27, last year, until the defendants give up possession.

    It further asked for 21 per cent interest on the accrued sums until judgment is given, five per cent interest until the sum is fully liquidated, and N100 million damage on the suits.

  • Ojukwu: Bianca must be properly served with suit, says judge

    Ojukwu: Bianca must be properly served with suit, says judge

    Justice Adedayo Oyebanji of the Lagos State High Court, Igbosere, yesterday ordered that a suit filed against Ambassador Bianca Ojukwu and seven others over some property must be properly served on her.

    She said the suit should be published in a national newspaper since she could not be served personally.

    The suit, which is one of several others before different judges, was filed by a lawyer and businessman Chief Debe Odumegwu-Ojukwu.

    The claimant was disowned by the Ojukwu family, who insisted he was not a son of the late Ikemba Nnewi.

    Mrs Ojukwu was not represented during yesterday’s proceedings.

    There was confusion over her current address.

    She had claimed in another suit that she lived in Ikoyi, Lagos, with her children.

    As Nigeria’s ambassador to Spain, the claimant’s lawyer, Jeff Kadiri, said it was not clear where she could be reached.

    He said the Court Sheriffs had executed the judge’s earlier order of substituted service of the papers on Bianca by pasting them on the wall of her Enugu home.

    According to Kadiri, “as a politician”, Mrs Ojukwu was deemed to be living in both Enugu and Spain.

    The claimant and a firm, Silver Convention Nig Ltd are urging the court to declare that he is entitled to the properties of the late Ojukwu.

    He said was denied any of the assets by those where supposed to be his brothers.

    The defendants include Ojukwu Transport Ltd, Prof. Joseph Ojukwu, Mr. Emmanuel Ojukwu, Mr. Lotanna Ojukwu, Mr. Emeka Odumegwu-Ojukwu, Mr. Patricia Ojuwku and Mrs Margaret Nwagbo (Nee Ojukwu).

    Debe claimed he lost “several contracts, business opportunities and goodwill” due to “continuous denigration” by the family.

    He also claimed that Silver Convention Nig Ltd., which he claimed to be running on the family’s behalf, financed Ojukwu’s burial to the tune of N100million.

    He prayed the court to declare that he, “as the first and eldest son of Dim Odumegwu-Ojukwu” is “entitled to manage or lead in the management and control of all the disposable assets and belongings” of Ojukwu Transport Limited.

    Debe claimed that the family did not let him perform the dust-to-dust burial rites in honour of “his father”.

    He asked the court to hold that he is entitled to collect the military paraphernalia used for the burial ceremonies of the late Ojukwu.

    According to him, his mother, Magaret, gave birth to him to the late Ojukwu on August 3, 1956.

    He therefore sought a perpetual injunction restraining the defendants “from tampering or interfering in any manner” with any of “his father’s” real and personal estates.

    He also asked N200million as general damages against the defendants.

    The defendants denied that Debe is their brother.

    However, Bianca is yet to file a statement of defence.

    The other defendants insisted that Debe and Magaret were never known as members of the Odimegwu-Ojukwu family.

    According to them, Debe was never mentioned by the late Odimegwu-Ojukwu as a family member.

    They said eight people were listed Ojukwu’s Will.

    The will, they said, was published in a national newspaper last December 2, but Debe’s name was not in it.

    They claimed Debe only got involved in managing Silver Convention Nig. Ltd through his law firm, Ogbonnaa Ojukwu & Associates.

    The management, they added, was based on an agreement with the family meant subsist from 1995 and 2007.

    Justice Oyebanji adjourned till May 22 for mention.

     

  • Bianca’s children sue Ojukwu’s firm,  others for Lagos property

    Bianca’s children sue Ojukwu’s firm, others for Lagos property

    Two children of the late Ikemba Nnewi, Dim Chukwuemeka Odumegwu-Ojukwu– Afamefuna and Nwachukwu– have sued a company, Ojukwu Transport Limited, and seven others over some property located in Ikoyi and Yaba, Lagos Mainland.

    The claimants, who are infants, are suing through their mother and “next friend” Ambassador Bianca Odumegwu-Ojukwu.

    The suit is before the Head Judge, Justice Funmilayo Atilade, of the Lagos State High Court, Igbosere.

    The other defendants are Prof Joseph Ojukwu, Engr Emmanuel Ojukwu, Lotanna Putalora Ojukwu, Dr Patrick Ojukwu, Arc Edward Ojukwu, Lota Akajiora Ojukwu and Mrs Massey Udegbe (doing business under Massey Udegbe & Company).

    The claimants sought a declaration that they are entitled to the possession and occupation of a property located on 29 Oyinkan Abayomi Drive (formerly Queens Drive), Ikoyi until the harmonisation of the management and administration of the first defendant’s assets.

    They also asked the court to declare that the threat to forcefully eject them from 29, Oyikan Abayomi Street, Ikoyi, by the defendants is illegal.

    The children urged the court to hold that they are entitled to the possession of the properties on 13, Hawksworth Road, Ikoyi (now 13, Ojora Road, Ikoyi), 32A Commercial Avenue, Yaba, 30, Gerard Road, Ikoyi, and 4, Macpherson Avenue, Ikoyi.

    They claimed that the houses were in the possession of their father from the time the properties were released from government acquisition till date.

    The claimants prayed for an order restraining the defendants either by themselves or through their agents or privies from interfering with their possession and control of 29, Oyinkan Abayomi Street, Ikoyi.

    They also urged the court to stop the defendants from interfering with their possession of the other properties.

    The claimants stated that throughout the period their father was struggling to retrieve the properties from the government, the second to seventh defendants “never played any role in the struggle nor contributed financially or otherwise to the realisation of the struggle.”

    They said while Ojukwu was alive, he lived with his household at 29, Oyikan Abayomi Drive and was in “exclusive possession” of the other houses which form the subject of the suit.

    But the defendants denied the claims, saying the children are neither directors nor creditors of Ojukwu Transport and therefore have no locus (legal right) to question the company’s activities.

    The defendants said at no point did they attempt to forcibly take possession of 29, Oyikan Abayomi Drive, Ikoyi.

    “The property belongs to the first defendant (the company). The fact is that the claimants’ mother, being greedy, felt she could hold onto the first defendant’s properties.

    “For over 12 years prior to his death, the late Dim Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu moved to Enugu and since then had not lived at the first defendant’s property as alleged by the claimants.

    “The property became dilapidated and in a state of disrepair.

    “The first defendant challenges the claimants to show proof of any such agreement which their late father had from the first defendant for him to control and/or manage the properties of the first defendant.”

    When the case came up yesterday, counsel to the claimants, Nick Omeye, said the first to seventh defendants had served him with their statements of defence.

    The eight defendant’s lawyer, he added, served him with a memorandum of appearance yesterday morning.

    The eighth defendant’s lawyer, Ifeanyi Okumah, asked for a little time to file the statement of defence.

    The court granted him 14 days to do so.

    Counsel to first to seventh defendants George Uwechue (SAN) informed the court that he had filed a counter-affidavit and an affidavit of compliance in response to the claimants’ processes.

    Justice Atilade, who granted a prayer for extension of time, adjourned till March 19.

     

  • Ambassador Ojukwu commends Nigeria’s outing at FITUR in Spain

    Nigerian Ambassador to Spain, Bianca Ojukwu, has expressed delight at the Nigerian stand as one of the biggest tourism trade fair, popularly called FITUR Madrid, opens yesterday in Spain.

    According to the ambassador, the structure erected by the Nigerian delegation led by the Director General of the Nigerian Tourism Development Corporation (NTDC), Otunba Olusegun Runsewe, was eye-catching and aesthetically attractive and will endear exhibitors to, not only make inquiries, but to buy into some of the products that the Nigerian nation is offering.

    FITUR prides itself on being one of the biggest trade fairs in the world with over 150 nations participating and over 100,000 people attending. It is a platform where participating nations showcase their products and discuss with potential investors which in turn could improve their different economies.

    The ambassador, who participated in the opening ceremony, later returned to the Nigerian stand where she had an exhaustive discussion with Runsewe besides commending his efforts in translating his visions into realities over the years in the tourism sector.

    She expressed President Goodluck Jonathan’s administration to continue to partner tourism-related organisations beause they have emerged as a veritable platform capable of alleviating poverty and improving the economic status of the country.

    According to her: “Having gone round the fair, I want to state that the Nigerian stand is impressive and eye-catching. With a big logo proclaiming Nigeria with an inscription ‘Tourism is Life’, and painted in our national colours, it is obvious that this concept will endear exhibitors and tourists to our stand. The inscription encapsulates the essence of tourism indeed because tourism is life.

    “ Nigeria is proud to showcase her rich cultural heritage, and with Runsewe, the message is clear which is making Nigeria a preferred destination for tourism. This administration has taken a lot of steps to facilitate investment because the nation has a lot to offer, especially with focus on ecotourism. We wish to expand the frontiers of tourism and enlarge our business coast to improve our economy.

    Otunba Runsewe thanked the ambassador, especially for commending the initiatives of the corporation in making possible a beautiful outing that has afforded the country the opportunity to showcase its potential and artifacts.

  • ‘I advised Ojukwu against secession’

    ‘I advised Ojukwu against secession’

    Renowned novelist Prof. Chinua Achebe recently stirred a controversy in his latest book, ‘There was a country’, where he castigated the war-time Federal Commissioner for Finance and Vice Chairman of the Federal Executive Council, the late Chief Obafemi Awolowo, over the handling of the civil war. But in a previous interview with the foremost economist, the late Prof. Sam Aluko, he attributed the avoidable war and consequent loss of lives to the refusal of the former Military Governor of the defunct Eastern Region, the late Col. Emeka Odumegwu-Ojukwu, to heed his advice against secession.

     

    How close were you to the late Chief Emeka Odumegwu-Ojukwu?

    I will say that I was very close to him till his death. Immediately, he became governor of the former Eastern Region, when I was a senior lecturer in Economics in the University of Nigeria, Nsukka, he called me the third day he became governor. He said he wanted to come and see me in my university. I never met him before. How can the military governor come and see me? I said no. I told him I would come and see him, instead. I told the person he sent that he should tell the governor that I was the one who should come and see him and not him coming to see me. That was on January 20, 1966. So, when I said I was going to see him, my wife said she would go with me. She said we didn’t know the man and therefore she wanted to be present at the meeting. She reasoned that we couldn’t predict a soldier who just came. When we got to the military governor’s house, Ojukwu said: ‘Madam, I know you would come because you thought that I will do something to your husband.’

    He said he had never met me before, but those in the military had been reading so much about me and they venerated me. According to him, that was why he wanted to see me. He said he wanted me to help him to run the government of the Eastern Region. ?We discussed and he asked what role I would like to play and I said I would remain in the university because I didn’t want to leave. I promised to do whatever I could do to help him. The first cabinet that he formed, we both sat down and looked at the names of those from the Eastern Region to be cabinet members. He did not know them because he was not living in the Eastern Region. He was outside, in Kaduna and in Lagos. He spoke Yoruba better than I. So, we were speaking in Yoruba most of the time. That’s how the relationship began and we became very close. It was through him that I knew Adekunle Fajuyi, the governor of the Western Region. We continued until after the counter-coup in July. I was very sad. They killed many Igbo. Many who were not killed had cuts in the head and other parts of the body. He called me and said what could he do? What was going on in his mind was to go to a place in Benue and sack a village there. He wanted to kill as many people as possible. I said no. I said as a Christian, Christianity doesn’t allow for vengeance. As a Christian, I said he should not do that.

    Was that when the killings in the North started?

    Yes. That was the period the pogrom started. I said he should get in touch with the Head of State, but he said no because it was wrong for Yakubu Gowon to be Head of State because there was Ogundipe, who was a Brigadier and the most senior military officer at the time. He said when the coup happened in January, the most senior officer became the Head of State. So, he argued that when the counter-coup happened, the most senior should also become the Head of State. But the northerners will not take that at that time. Ogundipe himself did not want it because he said there were few Yoruba in the army. He said he will just be there without support and they would kill him. So, they made him High Commissioner in London. When the pogrom continued and the people were coming to the East from the North, Ojukwu said he was afraid that the easterners coming back might attack those who are non-easterners in the East.

    He then made a statement on the radio that all those who were non-easterners should leave the East. At the time, there was rumour that Professor Babatunde Fafunwa was killed because he was from the West. But Fafunwa was in Benin Republic attending a conference. Ojukwu said the rumour was a sign of what was to happen. He said they would be attacking the northerners and the westerners and claim easterners did. So, he will ask everybody to go. I went to see him in Enugu and I said: “well, Your Excellency, I will have to go back to the West.” He said no, emphasising that when he talked of westerners, it did not apply to me because I was one of them. Non-easterners in the East were scared. Fafunwa and I were the most senior in the place. Fafunwa was not around and I said: “I will have to take them to the West to make sure that they were safe.” He said it was OK and that he will give me soldiers to make sure that all the students and staff were safe. He said when I got to Benin, I should hand them over to the governor in Benin to take them to the West and I should return to my job in Nsukka.

    What of your protection?

    He said I needed not worry because I was one of them. Really, I was being integrated in the East because, at that time, Obafemi Awolowo was in the Calabar prison and I was the only one allowed to see him. Ojukwu used to give me protection to go and see him. So, I was enjoying myself. When I got to Benin, I did not return to the East. I got the people to Ibadan and then called him to say: “Your Excellency, I am here and I am no longer coming back to the East.” He said: “Doctor, don’t call me Your Excellency, call me Emeka. You are older than I and I adore you. Just call me Emeka and I will call you Sam.” I was talking to him every night from Ibadan. When the problem was brewing, General Adeyinka Adebayo was then the governor of the Western Region. He called me and said he understood that the easterners were planning a counter-coup and I would have to go to Enugu to see Ojukwu. He said that he had been trying to get him without success. I said I had his secret telephone number and I gave it to General Adebayo. But Ojukwu did not pick the phone from anybody. So, Adebayo asked the late Professor B. A. Oyenuga and I to go and see him. So, we went to Enugu and I delivered the letter. He told Professor Oyenuga that if he had not come with me, he would not have discussed with anybody. The only person he trusted was Dr. Aluko. I was not a Professor at that time. When we finished in the evening, we went to our hotel. Ojukwu came to me in my hotel room and said: “Doctor, I want to talk to you confidentially.” And he said: “Our plan in the East is that we are no longer safe in Nigeria. We want to secede.”

    What date was this?

    That was January 1967. I said: “Emeka, I don’t think you should think of secession. I said it was the Igbo that were killed in the North and not all easterners.” I said “from my living in the East and going round the East, I know that the Igbo were not very popular in the Rivers area and the Calabar area. I told him that if he declared secession, he would be fighting two wars. I told him he would be fighting internal war against people with him, who didn’t want to be ruled by the Igbo and he would be fighting Nigeria who didn’t want him to succeed. I told him not I didn’t think he could win the war. I think that made a great impression on him. He said: “Doctor, your analysis is perfect.” He said, “after all, why should I secede? “He said: “All my father’s property are in Lagos. I was brought up in Lagos. I came to the East on posting as a military governor. I have discovered that ruling the Igbo is like ruling a pack of wild horses. They are very difficult to rule. I will rather want to be away from here to another place. It is very difficult to persuade the Igbo against their will.” I told him he didn’t have to persuade them against their will, just be loyal to them. I went back to Adebayo. We had a reconciliation meeting. Awolowo, Onyia and myself were sent to meet Ojukwu in Enugu. Ojukwu insisted that if I did not come, he would not receive them. So, we went together. We discussed.

    When was this?

    That was March 1967. Awolowo was very frank with him. He told him: “Look, governor, you cannot secede. You cannot go alone. Just as you fear the North, the West also fears the North. The soldiers in the North are occupying the West. So, we have the same common interest. But don’t let us secede. Let us do whatever we can do together to unite and confront the North so that we can have a settlement on how we want to run this country.” Awolowo said, if the East left the federation, the Yoruba would have to leave the federation. That’s what some misconstrued to say that Awolowo assured Ojukwu that if he seceded, the Yoruba would join. What he meant was that the thing that makes Igbo leave the federation would also make the Yoruba leave the federation, but that he didn’t want to leave the federation. According to Awolowo, we want to enjoy and rule this federation because nobody has the monopoly to rule this federation; so, let us be in constant touch; let us unite and don’t do anything rash. When we left, I went to Nsukka and Ojukwu called me and said I should come back. I went back to him that evening.

    Where was Awolowo?

    He was in Enugu, at the Hotel Presidential. But I went to see my friends in Nsukka.

    What of protection for you and Awolowo?

    I didn’t need protection in the East, but Awolowo was protected. He was just released from prison. So, he didn’t need much protection. Ojukwu came in the evening to my hotel room and said he did not want to be very frank with us because he didn’t know Awolowo and Onyia. But he knew me. He said what he wanted is to make Rivers, Benue and Niger the boundary between the North and the South. He wanted a confederacy of the country so that the South will be Southern Nigeria versus Northern Nigeria and if Northern Nigeria wanted to go away, let them go away. I said: “look, I don’t think we should do that. I don’t think it would work. I have told you that the West has not suffered the way the East has suffered. How your people are angry is not the way and manner our people are angry. So, if you declare unilateral secession, you won’t get the whole West to follow you.” He said I had said so before and would not do it. So, I came back to the West and reported to Gowon what we discussed in Enugu.

    You told Gowon all that Ojukwu told you confidentially?

    Yes. I told Ojukwu I would brief Gowon. He liked Gowon and the only thing he had against Gowon was that he ought not to be Head of State. He said it was usurpation. I said but Gowon was already Head of State. That is how I became an intermediary between Gowon and Ojukwu. Gowon told me that he had been trying to get Ojukwu but he would not take the telephone. I said he had three secret telephones. There was one in Enugu, one in Onitsha and one in Nnewi, which he gave to me. At that time, it was the ground phone that was available. I gave them to Gowon. On the night before he was to declare secession, Adebayo called me that despite the assurances by Ojukwu, he learnt that he was going to declare secession tomorrow. I said I spoke to him last night and he did not tell me that he was going to declare secession. So, I called him and said: “Emeka, I have just learnt from the Head of State that you want to declare secession tomorrow.” He said, yes, that the people met and said if he wanted to continue to be military governor, he should either declare secession or quit.

    He said that to quit meant death. I said, “but you are a leader and a leader is not supposed to follow? People are supposed to follow the leader. Try and dissuade them from declaration. Let us see if we can do a number of things.” Anyway, he declared secession. Much later he said, “Sam, I have declared. I am sorry. We will continue to talk.” I said: “Look, this declaration is only declaration. The war has not started. We can still talk. If you want confederation, we can still talk. I said Canada has a confederal system.” We ended at that. So I told Gowon that Ojukwu was willing to talk if he could have a place to talk. Gowon said if Ojukwu would come to Lagos. I said Ojukwu would not come to Lagos. He said what of Benin? I said Ojukwu would not come to Benin. I said he regarded those as part of the enemy territory. That was how we settled for Aburi, in Ghana.

    Who suggested Aburi?

    I suggested Aburi to Ojukwu. He was first thinking of East Africa, like Tanzania. I said it was too far. I told him that if he was away Gowon was away in this turbulent time, they could plan coup against Gowon in Nigeria and plan coup against him in Biafra. I told him he should go to a place where he can go in the morning and come back in the evening. That was how we settled for Aburi. He also thought of Liberia. But I said Liberia was a bit far. At the Aburi meeting, you know Ojukwu is highly educated; so he prepared very well. Gowon went there with the hope that he was going to discuss with an old friend soldier and agree, like the Yoruba way of settling disputes, that, nobody is guilty, let us go on as we are doing.

    He did not go with the Awolowos and Permanent Secretaries?

    No. He went with a few people. And so, Ojukwu outwitted them there and got all he wanted as a confederal system.

    Who went with him?

    He went with soldiers. He went with officers of the army. So, when they returned and published the agreement, Ojukwu was very happy. It was published by Nigeria. But top civil servants, like Allison Ayida and others said this was disintegration of Nigeria. They said there was nothing left for Ojukwu to sever within one day. It was less than a confederation. It was virtually creating two countries. That was how Gowon developed cold feet to implement the Aburi agreement.

    You did not go to Aburi?

    No. I didn’t. Immediately he came from Aburi, he called me and said: “The agreement was fantastic. When we implement it, you will have to come back to your job in Nsukka.” He called me from Port Harcourt because he was then in Port Harcourt. When the Aburi agreement could not be implemented, he said Biafra Republic is indissoluble. No power in Africa can dissolve it. But I was going almost every month to Enugu, Nnewi or Onitsha to see him. What worried me, as I told him, was that whenever I was going from Onitsha to Enugu or Onitsha to Nnewi, soldiers who are eastern soldiers would say: “Doctor, please tell Governor we don’t want to fight. We have suffered enough.

    We don’t want to fight.” So, I will always tell him: “Emeka, the people you say no power in Africa can stop, are not willing to fight. They are not with you 100 percent. This is what they tell me.” He said he knew but there was no going back and that he had secured the confidence of the French, British, the Americans and some African countries. I said: “Don’t rely on Western powers. They are talking to you now because you are controlling the oil. Immediately there is war and they take the oil from you, they will desert you. It is because the oil is in the East and you are military governor in the East. But with what I see, immediately those in Rivers and Cross Rivers desert you and they link with the Federal Government and the Federal Government take those places from you, Britain, America and France will leave you,” which is what they did.??What I like about Gowon was that throughout the period, he was always in touch with me and I was always in touch with him.

    But the soldiers were always coming to my house in Ife, saying that I was a saboteur and that I was linking with rebels and that I was the ambassador of Ojukwu in the West. They would come and search my house that I had arms and so on and so forth. They did that until Gowon told them not to worry me again. They didn’t know I was in touch with Gowon. Every night, I will call Ojukwu and he will call me even when he was in the bunker. I once asked where he was calling? He said he was calling from the bunker in Aba. I reminded him that he said he was in Enugu and he said Enugu meant hill and anywhere he was hill. When the war started and the Nigerian soldiers started getting upper hand, he still believed he could win.

    What was he saying when Nigeria had upper hand?

    He believed after some time, they would collapse because he was also winning some skirmishes. He killed some soldiers in Awka. He killed some in Asaba. So, he was winning some small, small wars too. But I was a bit against him that there was no way he could win. About the end of 1968, I called him and said, “look, Emeka, try to make approach when Dr. Azikiwe defected.”

    Why did Azikiwe leave him?

    Ojukwu did not like Azikiwe.

    Why?

    Two masters cannot be in a boat. Azikiwe was so dominant in Nigeria and he was living in the East and Ojukwu was the military governor of the East. So, obviously, he would be looking over his shoulder because of Azikiwe. He might think he was more important than him (Azikiwe) as the military governor. It’s under-standable. In fact, he told me once that he had a lot of people watching Azikiwe. Finally, Azikiwe defected and came back to Nigeria. I said; “Emeka, I told you there is no way you can win this war.” I said use Azikiwe as intermediary between Gowon and yourself and let us settle this matter. That was at the end of 1968. We were talking in Yoruba. We always talked in Yoruba. We continued talking like that until the eve of his departure to Ivory Coast. After sometimes, he believed there were a lot of saboteurs in the East, who were no longer willing to fight. The French, British, Americans and even the Russians did not support him.

     

    •The interview was first published in The Sun of February 8, 2012.

  • Ojukwu’s will: Bianca may appear before  Nnewi elders’ council

    Ojukwu’s will: Bianca may appear before Nnewi elders’ council

    Ambassador Bianca Ojukwu, the widow of the late Ikemba Nnewi, Dim Chukwuemeka Odumegwu-Ojukwu, is to appear before a traditional arbitration council of Nnewi elders, if she plans to remarry.

    The council, called Agbalor, would spell out the stipulations of the people’s tradition on a second marriage.

    A member of Nnewi royal family (Eze Ogune) and member of the apex decision-making body in Nnewi, Nzuko Ora Nnewi, Mr Tempest Udeze, spoke with our reporter.

    He explained that Nnewi tradition demands that a woman married to any of the men in three-quarters of Nnewi should not remarry after the death of her husband.

    She forfeits her entitlements from her late husband’s family, if she insists on a second marriage, Udeze said.

    The former Secretary of Nnewi North Local Government explained the tradition and its implication on Bianca’s future.

    He said: “It is in line with the traditional norms of Nnewi. There is no way a woman would leave her husband when pronounced he dies and be allowed to take all she benefited from him to another man in the name of re-marrying.

    “The property she acquired through the name of Ikemba Nnewi would be forfeited should she think of remarrying. Until she does so, let us not preempt the matter. Even her bride price will be returned, if she remarries. Once that is done, she loses all the property and wealth she acquired with the name and influence of Ikemba Nnewi, including the children, who will remain in Ojukwu’s custody.”

    Asked what happens if the woman refuses to relinquish all she has acquired, Udeze said: “We have a traditional court to deal with such issues. We call it Agbalor. It is headed by Okpala Nnewi in Umudim. If that fails, the conventional way of arbitration comes in handy.”