Tag: Okezie Ikpeazu

  • Court refuses Ikpeazu’s request to set aside order on INEC

    Court refuses Ikpeazu’s request to set aside order on INEC

    A Federal High Court in Abuja has rejected request by Abia State governor, Okezie Ikpeazu to set aside the enrolled orders on its judgment of June 27 on which basis the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) issued a certificate of return to Samson Ogah.

    Following the June 27 judgement by Justice Okon Abang, sacking Ikpeazu, an enrolment of the judgment orders were served on INEC, on which it relied in issuing the certificate of return to Ogah.

    Monday, Ikpeazu’s lawyer, Wole Olanipekun (SAN) had while praying the court to set aside the enrolled orders, argued that it formed the basis of the confusion created by INEC’s action.

    Olanipekun, in his counter-response, again accused INEC and Ogah of being the ones resorting to self-help.

    He argued that there was no justification for presenting the certificate of return to Ogah on June 30 after INEC had received the notice of appeal and the motion for stay of execution on June 28.

    He went on to urge the court to set aside the enrolled order of the court issued with respect to the judgment served on INEC, which he said was the foundation of the “purported issuance of the certificate of return” to Ogah.

    He also asked the court to quash the certificate of return issued to Ogah by INEC.

    He said, “I urge your lordship to set aside the certificate of return purportedly issued by INEC on June 28 and handed over to the plaintiff/respondent on June 30 during the pendency of the processes before the Court of Appeal.”

    He urged the court to quash the enrolled order which it issued on the strength of the judgment, arguing that it ought not to have been issued without the parties being given a time lag to exhaust their rights of appeal.

    “Execution of judgment is not automatic as people think. The court is expected to give a time lag to the defendant/judgment debtor,” Olanipekun saidM

    Justice Abang refused to set aside the enrolled court order, saying section 19 of the Sheriff and Civil Processes Act, relied on by Olanipekun did not define processes to include the enrolled court order.

    Describing Olanipekun’s application for the voiding of the court’s enrolled order as lacking in merit, Justice Abang said the court had the power to enroll its order at any time after judgment had be delivered.

    Later, Olanipelun prayed the court to adjourned hearin to a later date in his client’s application for stay of proceedings to enable his respond to the reply filed by Ogah’s lawyer, Alex Iziyon (SAN).

    Iziyon objected and urged the court to set aside the order of the Abia State High Court in Osisioma restraining the Chief Judge of the state from swearing in Ogah as governor, and reiterate the judgment of the court.

    Izinyon argued that going ahead to obtain such an order from the Abia High Court without bringing the order to the attention of Justice Abang on Monday, Ikpeazu had resorted to self-help.

    Izinyon asked the court to set aside the Abia State High Court’s order and reiterate the judgment since Ikpeazu’s motion for stay of execution had allegedly achieved essentially what the motion intended to achieve.

    I”My lord the question to ask borders on the integrity and the sanctity of this order obtained from the Abia State High Court and the application before this court now.

    “They are asking for a date when they have in their pocket a court order which has tied the hands of the plaintiff preventing him from presenting himself for swearing in, contrary to the order of this court.

    “My lord, what is paramount here is that the applicant, Okezie Ikpeazu, went somewhere else to get this order from another High Court.

    “We submit with respect that the applicant did not bring this to your lordship’s attention. They have not told your lordship that they went somewhere else to obtain the order.

    “Now that we have brought this to the attention of the court, our application is that your lordship will undo the act of the applicant by setting aside the order because it was made during the pendency of this application,” Iziyon said.

    In his contribution, lawyer to INEC, Alhassan Umar justified the decision of his cleint to issue certificate of return to Ogah despite the appeal filed by Ikpeazu.

    He argued tahe the mere filing of notice of appeal by Ikpeazu could not operate as stay o proceedings to restrain INEC from executing an order of court duly served on it.

    “We do not object to the application for adjournment.

    “On the issue of enrollment order of this court, the third defendant/respondent (INEC) issued Certificate of Return to the plaintiff respondent as ordered by this court.

    “My Lord, on the issue of time of service of the processes, with due respect, the certificate speaks for itself. The date it was issued is on the certificate.

    “My lord ordered the third defendant to issue certificate of return forthwith and upon service of the order, my lord, on June 28, 2016, the 3rd defendant issued a certificate of return accordingly.

    “The certificate of return was issued before we were served with the motion on June 28. We had issued the certificate upon being served with the order.

    “The certificate bears the date it was issued. We were served with the motion on June 28. But we had issued the certificate upon being served with the order.

    “By the issuance I meant it was signed on June 28, but the actual presentation of the certificate was on June 30.

    “My lord, we had no difficulty in issuing the certificate because election matters are suis generis (are in class of their own), and where the law intends that an appeal should operate as a stay, it is expressly stated so.

    “Section 143 (1) of the Electoral Act deals with election petitions and appeals arising therefrom. The judgment of this court, in our view is not regulated by section 143(1) of the Electoral Act.

    “My lord, in other words, if the law intended that an appeal in a pre-election matter should operate as a stay against the judgment of the court it would have expressly provided so,” Umar said.

    After listening to parties’ submission, Justice Abang elected to hear all pending application, including Ikpeazu’ motion for stay of execution and Ogah’ motion to set aside the order by Abia State High Court to July 7.

    Meanwhile Ogah has appealed to his supporters to remain calm and awaiting the outcome of the pending issues before the court.

    Ogah, in a statement Monday by his Special Adviser on Public Communications, Onyekachi Ubani said “As we enjoin the great people of Abia to remain calm and peaceful as we expect Justice to be done on the matter, Dr Ogah again reaffirms his belief in the rule of rule of law and herein states that this is the right channel for Dr Ikpeazu and his team to seek redress other than resorting to the procurement of a clearly ‘black market judgment’ from an Abia High Court Dr Ogah’s swearing in.

    “It is pertinent to still reiterate that failure to have sworn in Dr Ogah  as the duly elected Governor of Abia State was  an  affront to the rule of law and constitutional governance. The added misfront of instituting and declaring a public holiday in Abia State  to further, in their own wisdom, frustrate Dr Ogah’s swearing in is a clear case of abuse of office.

    “As a law abiding citizen, we submit ourselves to the dictates of the rule of law and in the spirit of true and constitutional democracy await the judgment from the High Court in Abuja on the motion for stay of execution as regards Dr. Ogah’s swearing in slated for Thursday.

    “We enjoin all Abians to remain peaceful as we express optimism that come Thursday, justice will reign supreme over undue machinations. Our resolve to enthrone an Abia that will be the envy of all is total and there is no going back on this.”

  • Breaking: Court orders Abia governor to vacate office

    Breaking: Court orders Abia governor to vacate office

    A Federal High Court in Abuja on Monday ordered the Governor of Abia State, Okezie Ikpeazu, to vacate office with immediate effect for what submitting false information to his the People’s Democratic Party, for the party’s governorship primary which took place in December 2014.

    In the judgment, Justice Okon Abang ordered the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to issue a certificate of return to the plaintiff, Uche Ogah, who scored second highest number of votes during the primary.

     

  • Ikpeazu inaugurates Abia varsity Governing council

    Ikpeazu inaugurates Abia varsity Governing council

    Governor Okezie Ikpeazu of Abia on Friday inaugurated the Governing Council of Abia State University (ABSU),Uturu.

    Speaking during the inauguration ceremony, Ikpeazu charged members of the council to ensure that the institution occupied a leadership position among universities in Nigeria.

    The governor said that ABSU was the pride of the state and commended the university authorities for the strides recorded with meagre resources.

    “ABSU has always taken the lead in Law and Abia State Polytechnic, Aba, in ICT in the country, and the state took the first position in the recent WAEC examiniation.

    “This reveals that Abia has made positive statements in the country’s educational firmament and I urge the university authorities to continue in that vein.”

    He said that in order to check cultism in the institution, the council should do a profiling of the students of the institution.

    Ikpeazu observed that there was a huge number of prospective university undergraduates who could not find space in other universities in the country.

    He added that the council should be stringent in the implementation of the school’s admission policy, urging them to provide space in the school for the teeming youths.

    The governor said that it was pertinent for the institution to commercialise research activities in order to raise funds for the university.

    Responding on behalf of the other members of the council, the Prochancellor and Chairman of Council, Sen. Adolfus Wabara, thanked the governor for finding them fit to serve.

    Wabara said that he was confident that the council would live up to expectation in the discharge of its duties.

     

  • Still on the Abia tribunal blunders

    Still on the Abia tribunal blunders

    Many commentators, especially legal experts have continued to air their views regarding some of the judgments delivered by both the Houses of Assembly/National Assembly Tribunal and the Governorship Tribunal that sat in Umuahia recently.

    It is normal for people, both experts and laymen to try to scrutinize election Tribunal judgments because they have a lot to do with our democracy and leadership which centre on ensuring the well being of the people.

    One is always careful in commenting on such a sensitive issue to avoid being accused of partisanship, however, when one takes into consideration some of the events that took place before and during the elections in Abia, and subsequent events that played out during proceedings at the election Tribunals coupled with the reactions of majority of Abia voters, then it would not be out of p lace for a concerned citizen to comment.

    It would be recalled that while the Governorship case was pending at the Guber Tribunal, the All Progressives Grand Alliance (APGA) and her candidate Alex Otti who were challenging the victory of the Peoples Democratic Party’s candidate Okezie Ikpeazu, filed a motion to inspect the materials used in one of the contentious LGAs of Obingwa, their request was granted by the Tribunal, and after series of delay and frustration by INEC they agreed to grant APGA legal team and forensic experts access to the materials, unfortunately this legitimate order was flouted as thugs suspected to be working for the PDP assaulted the APGA legal  team, and prevented them from assessing those sensitive materials needed.

    This development  no doubt frustrated APGA as they were forced to return to the Tribunal to seek another order compelling INEC to bring the materials to  the Tribunal premises for inspection, unfortunately, less than twenty four hours before this order would be carried out, some arsonists also suspected to be supporters of the ruling party (PDP) stormed the INEC office in broad day light and set the place ablaze.

    APGA and her candidate were left with the option of requesting for materials of the other LGAs which were later brought for inspection after PDP and some INEC staff were said to have connived and mixed up the materials to frustrate the inspection.

    Having suffered avoidable delays as a result of INEC and PDPs unwillingness to obey the orders of the Tribunal on time, APGA and her candidate prayed for time extension to bring more witnesses, which observers believed would be the material contents of the forensic  examination, but shockingly, and suspiciously this motion was turned down by the Tribunal under the pretence that the parties were granted  seven days each to present their witnesses, and that having exhausted theirs, APGA would not be given additional time.

    The Tribunal took such a terrible decision without first of all considering that by the provisions of the electoral act, each of the parties was  entitled to fourteen days for presentation of witnesses,  and that the seven days given was because the Tribunal claimed it  was running out of time.

    Again, the Tribunal denied the extension of time without recourse to the delay tactics applied by INEC and the defense team who were never punished for their disobedience and lack of diligence.

    The Tribunal did not also reason that the petitioner’s legal team was given only seven days to face the three joined parties of Okezie Ikpeazu, PDP, and INEC  who were allocated separate number of days during the presentation of witnesses.

    Surprisingly, the Tribunal that claimed it was running out of time added extra four days to the date earlier agreed for adoption of written addresses, claiming that Abia judiciary wanted to use the Tribunal complex for a certain activities that ought not to have interfered with the Tribunal time table; this time around the Guber Tribunal wasn’t running out of time again, the same Tribunal that denied APGA time extension.

    To climax what could be described as an absurdity of legal proceedings, the Tribunal repeatedly used the word “re-run” against APGA  while delivering it’s judgement, when it was obvious that no re-run took place in Abia.

    The Tribunal in the most bizarre manner refused to align with APGA and her candidate in the case of Osisoma LGA where it was proven beyond reasonable doubt that the PDP L.G Collation agent and their House of Assembly candidate signed the results of the entire Ten Wards of the LGA instead of the Ward collation Agent as prescribed by the electoral act, the Tribunal did not just give their blessing on the grievous electoral crime, but also accepted the lies of the LGA and ward collation  agents of PDP who were caught  red handed lying under oath.

    The over eighty thousand votes fraudulently allocated to PDP and her candidate is one result that should alarm any unbiased mind even without going through the details of the election considering the pattern of voting and election results in the last election across the country, let alone the LGA in question, Obingwa LGA.

    As expected during the Tribunal proceedings, the result from Obingwa was exposed to the world as fake when a staff of INEC from Abuja appeared before the Tribunal and tendered a gazzetted INEC document in evidence which clearly contradicted and indicted the result earlier declared.

    Unfortunately the same Tribunal that accepted and never disputed the content of the document ignored its undisputed facts while delivering its judgment.

    In the case of Chief NnamdiIro Orji, the APGA candidate for Arochukwu/Ohafia constituency, the National Assembly Tribunal shocked everyone when it rejected the pink copies of the election results tendered by APGA showing the original results as earlier given by the INEC presiding officers before the fraudulaent results were announced by Senior INEC Officers in the State.

    Again, in one of the INEC result sheets that bore a report written by the INEC Officer in charge, it clearly listed details of votes as scored by the individual political parties and clearly showed that APGA won in all the polling units of the areas in question. The INEC staff also detailed how some agents of the PDP came and snatched the result sheets, and subsequently entered fraudulently figures which contradicted the genuine results, as the scores in figure differed in words. She subsequently used asterisk to differentiate the fake result from the original, unfortunately, the Tribunal used her discretion in the most unfair manner to accept the ones marked as fake.

    In another interesting case involving the APGA candidate for Aba North State Constituency in the Abia House of Assembly, the Tribunal said that it established a case of certificate forgery against the Aba candidate and thus nullified his election, ordered for fresh elections in some polling units, and subsequently barred APGA from taking part in the would be rerun election.

    However, in what looked like a selective justice and bizarre contradiction, the same Tribunal  established a case of double registration and forgery against the PDP candidate for Bende North State Constituency, but did not nullify his election on that basis, rather recommended  him for trial in a regular court? Two pre-election election matters, two parties but different judgments.

    There are other clear examples of miscarriage of justice involving the lower Tribunals that sat in Umuahia which cannot be listed here for want of space.

    One is no trying to play the innocent here or cast aspersion on the judiciarybecause of avoidable inactions of some judicial officers, but some of these judgment are not only conspicuously questionable but clearly suggest that there was a huge compromise taken to the point of ridicule.

    The appropriate authorities and institutions charged with the responsibility of ensuring justice and sanity in situations like this need to urgently look into what transpired in Abia so that a very dangerous precedent would not be set at the expense of the suffering masses.

    Injustice any where is a threat to justice everywhere-Martin Luther King Jnr.

     

     

    The author, Ekeoma is a social commentator

    He writes from Abia state, Nigeria.

  • Abia tribunal upholds Ikpeazu’s election

    The Abia State governorship election petitions tribunal sitting in Umuahia, on Tuesday, upheld the victory of Governor Okezie Ikpeazu in the April 11 gubernatorial election in the state.

    Ikpeazu, who represented the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) in the election, defeated the All Progressives Grand Alliance (APGA) candidate, Alex Otti, whose petition was dismissed by the tribunal.

    ‎ In a judgment that lasted for two hours, the chairman of the three- man panel, Justice Usman Bwala, said the APGA candidate failed to prove allegations of criminality and over voting in three local government areas beyond reasonable doubt.

     

     

     

  • Abia governor cuts own salary, allowance by 50%

    Abia State governor, Dr. Okezie Ikpeazu, on Monday placed himself on half salary and cut down his travelling allowances by 50 per cent until salaries and allowances owed workers are cleared.

    Ikpeazu said he is pained by his administration’s inability to pay workers’ salaries as and when due, stressing that he finds it difficult to receive salary when workers in the state are owed backlog of salaries.

    Speaking in Umuahia while swearing in the state new Head of Service, Dr. Vivian Uma, the governor said the plights of workers of the state are serious concern to his administration.

    Ikpeazu said that he is pained by the development and promised to do everything to ensure that salaries and allowances of workers in the state are systematically cleared.

    He, however, called on other appointees in his government to follow his example, stressing that there was need to cut down on the cost of governance for effective operation.

    He congratulated the new Head of Service on the appointment which he described as a milestone, pointing out that the appointment is part of his government’s desire to reinvigorate the civil service.

    Ikpeazu said that he expects the Abia civil service to be more proactive for the challenges ahead and urged the new HOS to ensure that the welfare of workers is paramount during his regime.

  • Okezie inaugurates Abia Assembly

    Azubuike elected as Speaker

    The 6th Abia State House of Assembly was inaugurated by the Clerk and Permanent Secretary of the House, Johnpedro Irokansi, after reading Governor Okezie Ikpeazu’s proclamation.

    Ikpeazu had earlier sent an order of proclamation of the House to the clerk, asking the Assembly to be inaugurated.

    He urged them to eschew rancour and ensure they make laws that will move the state forward.

    The House thereafter went into the election of the Speaker which saw a third term Peoples Democratic Party member, representing Isiala Ngwa North state constituency, Martins Azubike, emerging as Speaker unopposed.

    Cosmos Ndukwe, a former chief of staff to former governor Theodore Orji, emerged the Deputy Speaker after polling 13 votes to edge out Ikedi Ezekwesili of All Progressive Grand Alliance who polled nine votes.