Tag: Okon Abang

  • Miyetti Allah fails in bid to void Benue’s law banning open grazing

    A Federal High Court in Abuja has dismissed a suit filed by Miyetti Allah Kautal Hore seeking to void the 2017 Open Grazing Prohibition and Establishment Law passed by the Benue State House of Assembly.

    In a judgment on Thursday, Justice Okon Abang held that the plaintiff’s suit, marked: FHC/ABJ/CS/527/2017 was incompetent.

    Justice Abang further held that the plaintiff failed to comply with an earlier order of the court made about 19 months ago, directing it to file an amended originating summons.

    The judge awarded a cost of N100, 000 against the plaintiff to be paid to all the 14 defendants before any other step can be taken in the suit.

    Another judge of the court, Justice Babatunde Quadri, who was hearing the case before he was transferred to another division of the court, had, in an earlier ruling, held that the plaintiff had no valid originating summons before the court.

    Read Also: Miyetti Allah and security in Southeast

    Rather than taking steps to correct the error noticed by the judge by filing an amended originating summons, the plaintiff went to sleep and took no further steps.

    The Miyetti Allah Kautal Hore had, by the suit, sought among others, to restrain the Benue State Government from implementing the law as passed by the House of Assembly.

    The Benue State government had on November 1, 2017 officially effected its ban on open grazing throughout the state.

    This was after Governor Samuel Ortom on May 22,  2019 signed the anti-open grazing and anti-kidnapping, abduction, cultism and terrorism bills into law.

    The governor had said the anti-grazing law would put to an end to the incessant clashes between herdsmen and farmers in the state.

  • Alleged money laundering: Court ends Metuh’s defence

    Orders Channels to provide equipment to play submitted DVD

     

    A Federal High Court in Abuja has ended the defence of former spokesman of the People’s Democratic Party (PDP), Olisa Metuh in his trial for alleged money laundering.

    Justice Okon Abang, in a ruling on Friday, closed the case of Metuh (the 1st defendant) after his 11th witness; Oladeji Bamidele (an Advertising consultant) ended his testimony.

    The judge said he was closing the 1st defendant’s case because neither he nor his lawyer was in court to explain whether or not Metuh planned to call additional witnesses after his 11th witness.

    He said the court could not take their decision for them.

    Metuh’ who is being tried, with his company, Destra Investment Limited, has ceased to attend court since May 21 this year when he fell in court and had to be taken for medical attention.

    His lead lawyer, Emeka Etiaba (SAN) and other members of his legal team also stopped attending court from May 24.

    When Bamidele, who was cross-examined by Destra’s lawyer, Tochukwu Onwugbufor (SAN), concluded his testimony on Friday, lead prosecution lawyer, Sylvanus Tahir urged the court to close the 1st defendant’s case since neither him nor his lawyer was in court to explain his next line of action.

    Although Onwugbufor objected, the judge agreed with Tahir that the court could not wait indefinitely for a defendant who voluntarily refused to attend court and also had his lawyer abandon court without any explanation.

    The judge also directed the the second defendant to open its defence on the next hearing date.

    Justice Abang, who had on Wednesday, summoned two officials of Channels Television to show cause why they should not be compelled to produce a video recording of the station’s Sunrise Daily programme of May 22, commended them for promptly obeying the court.

    The judge had, on May 23 summoned the television station’s officials following complaint by Tahir that a lawyer in Metuh’s legal team, Ben Chucks Nwosu made prejudicial comments about the case while featuring in Channels TV’s Sunrise Daily.

    Read Also: I can’t be convicted, says Metuh

    Channels TV’s lawyer, Kelechi Nwaiwu told the court the two officials of the station, Oluyemisi Ipaye (Senior Manager, News and Corporate Services) and Maope Ogun-Yusuf (anchor of Sunrise Daily) have deposed to affidavit to show cause, as ordered by the court.

    He said, in addition, the officials have also filed in court, copies of the digital video disc (DVD), containing the unedited recording of the Sunrise Daily programme of May 22.

    The judge commended Channels TV for providing the recording of the programme even when the court has not formally ordered it to do so. Tahir and Onwugbufor also commended the television station.

    Justice Abang said the court’s commendation of the television station was limited to its prompt production of the DVD recording of the programme and that the court will go further to investigate if it willfully yielded its platform from some individuals to cast aspersions on the court.

    He adjourned to July 2 for continuation of trail, but ordered Channels TV to come to court on July 3, with its equipment to play the DVD for the court to see its content and decide what further steps should be taken.

  • Court doubts Metuh’s claim of ill health

    The Federal High Court, Abuja, has expressed doubts as to whether the claim of ill health by Olisah Metuh, the embattled former National Publicity Secretary of the People’s Democratic Party, (PDP), is true.

    The trial judge, Justice Okon Abang, said on Thursday while delivering a ruling on an application seeking the release of Metuh’s international passport to enable him travel abroad for medical treatment.

    According to the judge, “I am wondering, if the defendant is really sick as he claims, why he not appealed the two earlier decisions of the court that refused to release his international passport.

    “I doubt that he is really ill as he wants the court to believe, if he is, he should have appealed the decisions of the court at the Court of Appeal.”

    The judge wondered why Metuh appealed decisions of the trial court that had nothing to do with his health but refused to appeal those that dealt directly with his health.

    Abang held that it seemed there was a hidden agenda by Metuh to present the court as inhuman by filing the same application before the trial court a third time rather than going on appeal.

    He said that he agreed with the arguments of the prosecution that filing the application for a third time was an unpardonable and reckless abuse of judicial processes.

    The judge maintained that the defendants ought to know that where a trial court decided a matter, it could not be brought before it again under any guise.

    He further said that since the prosecution closed its case in 2016, the defendant, rather than defending his case, had taken several steps to frustrate the trial.

    The judge said that he could not sit on appeal over his own judgment having already refused an application for the release of Metuh’s passport twice.

    He added that contrary to the claim by Metuh’s counsel, Mr Onyeachi Ikpeazu, (SAN), there were no new facts in the current application as the facts in it were the same as those in the last two applications.

    “The issues raised in this application have already been determined in the two previous rulings on the matter; there is nothing new in this application.”

    He held that on account of Metuh’s conduct since the prosecution closed its case, he could not order the release of his passport and that he lacked jurisdiction to entertain the matter having decided it before.

    He therefore dismissed the application for lacking in merit and adjourned the matter until April 20 for continuation of trial.

    Metuh on March 14, for the third time, asked the court to release his international passport to enable him travel abroad for medical treatment.

    One of his counsel, Mr Emeka Etiaba (SAN), told the court that his client did not appeal the two previous applications which were refused by the court but added that this was a new and different application.

    Etiaba had told the court that the new application was premised on the grounds that Metuh had lost sensation in his legs adding that this never happened before.

  • Court doubts Metuh ’s claim of ill health

    The Federal High Court, Abuja, has expressed doubts as to whether the claim of ill health by Olisah Metuh, the embattled former National Publicity Secretary of the Peoples Democratic Party ( PDP ), is true.

    The trial judge, Justice Okon Abang, said on Thursday while delivering a ruling on an application seeking the release of Metuh’s international passport to enable him travel abroad for medical treatment.

    According to the judge, “I am wondering, if the defendant is really sick as he claims, why did he not appeal the two earlier decisions of the court that refused to release his international passport.

    “I doubt that he is really ill as he wants the court to believe, if he is, he should have appealed the decisions of the court at the Court of Appeal.”

    The judge wondered why Metuh appealed decisions of the trial court that had nothing to do with his health but refused to appeal those that dealt directly with his health.

    Abang held that it seemed there was a hidden agenda by Metuh to present the court as inhuman by filing the same application before the trial court a third time rather than going on appeal.

    He said that he agreed with the arguments of the prosecution that filing the application for a third time was an unpardonable and reckless abuse of judicial processes.

    The judge maintained that the defendants ought to know that where a trial court decided a matter, it could not be brought before it again under any guise.

    He further said that since the prosecution closed its case in 2016, the defendant, rather than defending his case, had taken several steps to frustrate the trial.

    The judge said that he could not sit on appeal over his own judgment having already refused an application for the release of Metuh’s passport twice.

    He added that contrary to the claim by Metuh’s counsel, Mr Onyeachi Ikpeazu, (SAN), there were no new facts in the current application as the facts in it were the same as those in the last two applications.

    “The issues raised in this application have already been determined in the two previous rulings on the matter; there is nothing new in this application.”

    He held that on account of Metuh’s conduct since the prosecution closed its case, he could not order the release of his passport and that he lacked jurisdiction to entertain the matter having decided it before.

    He therefore dismissed the application for lacking in merit and adjourned the matter until April 20 for continuation of trial.

    Metuh on March 14, for the third time, asked the court to release his international passport to enable him travel abroad for medical treatment.

    One of his counsel, Mr Emeka Etiaba (SAN), told the court that his client did not appeal the two previous applications which were refused by the court but added that this was a new and different application.

    Etiaba had told the court that the new application was premised on the grounds that Metuh had lost sensation in his legs adding that this never happened before.

    NAN

  • Metuh attends court on stretcher

    Metuh attends court on stretcher

    *Judge postpones trial to March 14

    Olisa Metuh was brought to court today on a stretcher in compliance with an order of a Federal High Court, Abuja that he must attend court or have his bail revoked.

    Justice Okon Abang in a ruling on January 25, rejected a medical report tendered by Lawyers of the Former spokesman of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), claiming he was on admission in an hospital.

    Instead, the judge ordered Metuh to attend court today or have the bail earlier granted him revoked.

    In compliance with that order, his lawyer ensured he was brought to court early today in a white ambulance, belonging to the National Hospital, Abuja.

    Read Also: Attend court Feb. 5 or be returned to prison, judge tells Metuh

    He was later taken into the courtroom on  a stretcher, with the assistance of some medical personnel, friends and relations.

    He was covered with a white cloth, with an opening only in his head area, possibly to allow him breathe. He had bandage on his legs and neck area.

    Metuh and his company, Destra Investment Limited are being tried on allegations of corruption and money laundering.

    When proceedings opened, Metuh’s lawyer, Onyechi Ikpeazu (SAN) told the court that his client was in court in obedience to the court’s order, but was not in a good state to stand trial.

    He sought a month’s adjournment within which Metuh would have been fit enough to stand trial.

    Lawyer to Destra, Tochukwu Onwugbufor (SAN) agreed with Ikpeazu’s position.

    Prosecution lawyer, Sylvanus Tahir did not object to an adjournment, following which Justice Tsoho adjourned to March 14 for possible continuation for trail.

    At the conclusion of proceedings around 10.15am, Metuh was again moved out of the courtroom, still on the stretcher, into the ambulance stationed close to the court’s main entrance.

     

  • Attend court Feb. 5 or be returned to prison, judge tells Metuh

    Attend court Feb. 5 or be returned to prison, judge tells Metuh

    Justice Okon Abang of the Federal High Court in Abuja has ordered a former spokesman of the Peoples Democratic Party ( PDP ) Olisa Metuh, to attend court on February 5 or be arrested and returned to prison.

    Justice Abang gave the order yesterday whiling on two applications. One by Metuh’s lawyer, Okezie Ikpeazu (SAN), for adjournment on health ground and the other by prosecution lawyern Sylvanus Tahir, seeking the revocation of Metuh’s bail for allegedly being absent in court for not cogent reasons.

    The judge said Metuh had been absent from his trial since Monday without any lawful excuse. This, the judge said, was a sufficient reason to revoke the defendant’s bail.

    Metuh and his company, Dextra Investment Limited are being tried on money laundering charges before the court.

    Last Monday, Metuh was absent in court and his lawyer said he was on admission at the Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital, Nnewi, Anambra State. He drew the court’s attention to a letter to thate effecr from the hospital.

    On Tuesday, Ikpeazu applied for an adjournment of the case to a period outside this week based on the health situation of his client, an application Tahir objected to.

    Tahir described the letter from the Nnamdi Azikiwe Teaching Hospital, relied on by Ikpeazu as worthless. 

    He urged the court to revoke  Metuh’s bail and return him to prison, from where he should be made to attend his trial.

    Justice Abang, in his ruling, noted that  the medical report  relied on by Metuh to stay away from court was fraudulently smuggled into the court’s file and aimed at forcing the court to stay proceedings in the trial indefinitely.

    The judge said EFCC’s application for the revocation of Metuh’s bail deserved to be granted, but that the court decided to suspend taking such step in order to afford the defendant another opportunity “to turn over a new leaf”.

    He agreed with Tahir to the effect the hospital’s letter dated January 21, 2018 indicating that Metuh had been on admission since the previous day, for treatment for an ailment, was sent to the court to frustrate the trial.

    He queried why the medical report had to be issued barely 24 hours to the resumption of the trial on January 22.

    The judge also queried how the letter issued in Nnewi, Anambra State, could find its way to the court’s file in Abuja within 24 hours. 

    He said the letter was fraudulently smuggled into the court’s file and defence lawyers chose to rely on it to ask for an adjournment yet refused to disclose the identity of the person who sent the document to the court.

    He noted that the “lengthy letter” by the hospital laced with many medical terms, was meant to confuse the court.

    “How will the court, not being an expert in the medical field, be able to understand it, if not to confuse the court and give the impression that the ailment is serious?” the judge asked.

    He ruled that the letter having not been filed before the court through established procedure and without any indication on it linking it to the trial, the EFCC’s lawyer was right to describe it as “a trash meant for the dustbin”.

    The judge noted that the letter failed to state the period that the defendant must be on bed restam He said it could be implied that the court had to adjourn the case indefinitely. 

    He said the application was like an application for stay of proceedings, which had been prohibited in criminal trials by the Supreme Court.

    He said: “That means the court will be forced to adjourned sine die (indefinitely). It is my humble view that this sounds like an application for stay of proceedings. It is not just a medical report but an application for stay of proceedings.”

    He recalled that the Supreme Court had in its judgment delivered on June 9, 2017, on an appeal by Metuh prohibited stay of proceedings in a criminal trial.

    The judge also recalled that the Supreme Court, delivering judgment in an appeal by Metuh’s firm and co-defendant, Destra Investments Limited, on January 12, 2018, had ordered the Federal Court to give the case an accelerated hearing.

    He said:  “Any purported medical report that will act as a stay of proceedings ought to be rejected by the court. The medical report was fraudulently smuggled into the court’s file.

    “I agree with the learned counsel for the prosecution that it a trash meant for the dustbin. It is a useless paper only dumped on the court.”

    He however said out of human sympathy he would consider the plea by defence lawyers  by adjourning the case till February 5.

    The judge said, “‎In view of the passionate plea by the learned senior counsel for the first and second defendants, I hereby suspend my decision to revoke the bail granted to the first defendant. I hereby give him another chance to turn over a new leaf.

    “Where the situation remains the same at the next adjourned date, this court shall exercise its power of revoking the bail. This matter is adjourned till February 5 and 6 for continuation of trial.”

    The judge further said that Metuh’s application for adjournment as argued on Tuesday and Wednesday had been overtaken by events since by his (Metuh’s) conduct, the court had been unable to record progress in the case since Monday.

    The judge granted the application by Metuh,  to call additional 10 witnesses.

    He noted that Metuh had engaged in different ploys to frustrate the trial and attempts, “to hijack the proceedings.

    “The first defendant has overstretched the patience of the court beyond limit in these proceedings,” Justice Abang said..

    He said the court would no longer accept any medical report from Metuh.

    The judge also ruled that the court would no longer entertain any application for adjournment to enable the defendant to call any witness.

    He therefore directed that all the remaining witnesses Metuh had to call must always be in court for all proceedings.

    Ikpeazu and lawyer to Destra, Tochukwu Onwugbufor (SAN), thanked the judge for showing sympathy to Metuh.

    They promised not to stall the trial, and noted that the judge has always given the case accelerated hearing before the January 12, 2018 judgment of the Supreme Court, which directed that the case be promptly decided.

  • N400m fraud: Court orders Metuh to appear in court Feb. 5 or risk jail

    N400m fraud: Court orders Metuh to appear in court Feb. 5 or risk jail

    The Federal High Court, Abuja, has asked former Peoples Democratic Party ( PDP ) spokesman, Mr Olisah Metuh, to be present at his trial on Feb. 5 or face jail.

    Justice Okon Abang gave the order on Thursday, when he delivered ruling in an application filed by Metuh, seeking an adjournment to his trial on health grounds.

    The judge said that the letter which Metuh wanted the court to rely on to grant the adjournment was not a proper document before the court.

    “I agree with the prosecution that the purported letter written by Dr O.C. Ekweogwu, who is unknown to the court, is trash and a useless paper meant for the dustbin, which was dumped on the court by the defence.

    “The said letter was fraudulently smuggled into the records of the court by a person unknown to the court with the intent to stall proceedings.”

    The judge said that there was a laid down procedure for filing a medical report in court.

    He said it was not the place of a medical practitioner to write a lengthy letter with several medical terms that were meaningless to the court.

    “The medical practitioner is to state the name of the illness and the period that the person will be incapacitated.”

    The judge further said that although the application by the prosecution to revoke Metuh’s bail and commit him to prison deserved to succeed, he would not grant it based on compassionate grounds.

    “It is my humble view that the application of the prosecution to revoke the defendant’s bail deserves to succeed, but I have given due consideration to the arguments of counsel to the defendant.

    “In view of the passionate plea of the defendant’s counsel who I have respect for, I hereby suspend my decision to revoke bail, but I ask that the defendant turns a new leaf.”

    The judge, however, said that if Metuh failed to appear in court on the next adjourned date, he would revoke the bail.

    “Arrest is a consequential order if bail is revoked, and so if the defendant’s bail is revoked, he will be arrested.

    “The outcome of his response when he appears in court will determine whether or not to put him in prison.”

    The court said that it was not inclined to try Metuh in absentia, as it was contrary to Section 266 of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act, 2015.

    The judge also said that he would no longer accept any medical report with respect to Metuh,  issued by a doctor in Nigeria.

    He further granted the application by the defendant’s counsel to bring seven additional witnesses, saying he will not accept any application for more witnesses.

    He adjourned the matter until Feb. 5 and 6 for continuation of trial.

    Metuh’s trial was to resume on Monday but he was absent in court.

    When the matter was called, Mr Onyeachi Ikpeazu (SAN), counsel to Metuh informed the court that his client was admitted at the Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital, Nnewi, and  was unable to attend court.

    Ikpeazu presented a letter written by a doctor in the hospital to the court, but both the judge and the prosecutor questioned the authenticity of the letter.

    The prosecutor went further to ask the court to revoke Metuh’s bail for breaching his bail conditions and commit him to prison.

    Metuh is standing trial over allegations of receiving N400 million from the former National Security Adviser, retired Col. Sambo Dasuki and also money laundering charges involving $2bn.

  • Metuh hospitalised in Nnewi, may be referred to UNTH Enugu – Lawyer

    Metuh hospitalised in Nnewi, may be referred to UNTH Enugu – Lawyer

    The trial of former spokesman of the Peoples Democratic Party ( PDP ), Olisa Metuh and his company, Destra Investment Limited on charges of money laundering was stalled yesterday owning to Metuh’s absence in court.

    Metuh and Destra are being tried before the Federal High Court in Abuja for allegedly receiving N400m unlawfully from the Office of the National Security Adviser (NSA) in 2014. They are said to have also engaged in money laundering to the tune of $2m.

    At the scheduled resumption of the trial yesterday, Metuh’s lawyer, Onyechi Ikpeazu (SAN), told the court that his client was absent because he was on admission at the Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital in Nnewi, Anambra State.

    Ikpeazu noted that the hospital has written a letter dated January 21, 2018 indicating that his client had been on admission since January 20, 2017.

    He read some portions of the letter from the hospital, where it stated that “we are managing him” and that it “may refer him to the University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital ( UNTH ), Enugu” for further treatment.

    Ikpeazu said he knew that the Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital in Nnewi hospital “is not as equipped as UNTH Enugu.”

    In reaction to the reference to a recent Supreme Court judgment on the case by the prosecution lawyer, Sylvanus Tahir, Ikpeazu said the trial judge, Justice Okon Abang has always given the case prompt hearing.

    He said the claim about Metuh’s ill health was not orchestrated by the defence to frustrate the trial.

    Ikpeazu applied for an adjournment to a later date to enable the defence report to the court on his client’s health situation.

    In further reaction to Tahir’ observation that the Supreme Court had, in its January 12, 2018 judgment in the appeal by Destra, order accelerated hearing, the company’s lawyer, Tochukwu Onwugbufor (SAN), said the Supreme Court’s directive for a speedy trial would not have a remarkable impact on the trial.

    Onwugbufor said, “Everybody who has participated in this case knows that your lordship has never tolerated any delay.

    “From my experience, the court has been very expeditious in the handling of this case and matters before it. Even the motion that went to the Supreme Court was determined by your lordship and it never constituted any delay to the hearing of this case.”

    Responding, Tahir said Metuh’s absence would hamper further progress in the trial. He said he would not oppose the defence’s request for adjournment because it was based on health ground.

    Tahir noted that the development would defeat the intention of the Supreme Court in its January 12 judgment. He said, “The apex court was clear and very emphatic on the need to bring the case to a conclusion.

    “The Supreme Court made an order directing this court to treat this case with dispatch. And here we are confronted with the situation that will seemingly defeat the order made by the Supreme Court,” Tahir said.

    In his ruling, Justice Abang observed that the trial was scheduled to resume yesterday for the prosecution to cross-examination Metuh’s 9th witness, Adebayo Bodurin.

    The judge agreed to adjourn to the next day (today) since the prosecution did not oppose the defence’s request for adjournment to enable it brief the court on Metuh’s health status.

  • Metuh: DSS produces Dasuki in court

    Metuh: DSS produces Dasuki in court

    The Department of State Services (DSS) on Wednesday produced the detained former National Security Adviser, Sambo Dasuki, in compliance with an order of the Federal High Court he should appear as a witness.

    He is expected to be a witness in the trial of a former Publicity Secretary of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Mr Olisa Metuh.
    Dasuki was decked in a light blue attire with a cap to match.
    On Tuesday, despite the request by defence lawyers for an order of arrest to be issued against the Director-General of the DSS, Lawal Daura, for failing to produce the ex-NSA in court, the trial judge, Justice Okon Abang ruled that he could not yet conclude that the DSS top man deliberately flouted the court order.
    But the counsel prosecuting Metuh and his company, Destra Investments Limited on behalf of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, Mr. Sylvanus Tahir, had informed the court on Tuesday that the Legal Adviser of DSS informed him over the telephone that Dasuki refused to be brought to court except by force.
    Tahir later told the judge that he received a text message from the Legal Adviser of DSS saying after much persuasion, Dasuki agreed to appear in court on Tuesday.
    But the judge had ruled on Tuesday that whether or not Dasuki and another subpoenaed witness, former President Goodluck Jonathan, would go ahead to testify would depend on the outcome of the court’s rulings on the summoned witnesses’ application objecting to Metuh’s request for them to testify in the case.
  • Court adjourns Badeh’s trial till July 4

    Court adjourns Badeh’s trial till July 4

    The trial of a former Chief of Defence Staff, Alex Badeh, was stalled on Monday, due to the ill health of the 19th prosecution witness.

    Justice Okon Abang adjourned the matter until July 4 for continuation of trial.

    The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that Badeh is standing trial for allegedly abusing his office by diverting N3.97 billion.

    The diverted money was meant for arms purchase in the face of worsening destructions by Boko Haram terrorists.

    At the resumed hearing, the Prosecuting Counsel, Mr Rotimi Jacobs (SAN), told court that he had to compel the witness to attend court but that the witness could not testify, due to ill health.

    “I practically forced the witness to be here today but I will not like the witness to testify in this state of mind,” Jacobs said.

    But, in spite of the presence of the witness in court, Jacobs prayed for an adjournment to enable the witness get better so that he could give his testimony in good health.