Tag: Okorie

  • Actress Angela Okorie advises against kissing kids on mouth

    Actress Angela Okorie advises against kissing kids on mouth

    Actress Angela Okorie has advised parents to avoid kissing their children on the mouth, describing the practice as unhealthy.

    In a post on her Instagram story, Okorie expressed concern about the potential transmission of infections through mouth-to-mouth contact and urged parents to opt for cheek kisses as a safer alternative.

    She wrote, “Stop kissing your kid’s mouth to mouth! Haaa. What happened to the cheek, Kwanu? They are kids; they don’t need your infected mouth, please. Kiss them on the cheek.

    “People will kiss their mother’s mouth to mouth. Kiss your father’s mouth to mouth. ‘Wetin happened to cheek’? Oh Jesus. Una dey vex me for this app. Abi, am I old-fashioned? Why mouth-to-mouth kwanu?”

  • Okorie, others to proffer solutions to leadership deficit

    Okorie, others to proffer solutions to leadership deficit

    Founder of GOTNI Leadership Centre, Dr Linus Okorie, along with other global speakers will converge on Abuja on Friday to proffer solutions to “Nigeria’s leadership crisis.”

    Speakers such as Brian Tracy, George Frazier, Femi Lazarus, among others are
    expected to take part in the national leadership conference.

    The conference with the theme, “Leadership Capital for Wealth Creation” is billed to hold between 20-21st of September 2024 at the Transcorp Hilton Hotel in Abuja the nation’s capital, providing them an opportunity to speak on the leadership deficit plaguing Nigeria for decades and proffer solutions.

    While addressing a press conference on Tuesday in Abuja, Okorie said contemporary challenges in the economy, coupled with institutional and social crises makes the conference, which will be packed full of ideas, germane.

    He said businesses and families in Nigeria are struggling because there is a huge leadership deficit which must be bridged to get the right impact.

    Okorie said: “With the ongoing evolution of Nigeria’s economic structure, the need to equip Nigerians with the tools and knowledge for maximising leadership potential and financial growth has become a significant priority.

    “In view of this, the forthcoming 2024 National Leadership Conference will provide participants with a distinctive opportunity to unlock the secrets to building sustainable wealth, identify leadership potential, and achieve financial growth.”

    Other top speakers to feature at the two – day event includes George C. Fraser, CEO of FraserNet, Inc.; Dr. Andy Ikekhinde, President of TGC Network Inc.: Michael V. Roberts, JD, Chairman & CEO of The Roberts Companies; Apostle Femi Lazarus, Lead Pastor of Sphere of Light Church; Senator Lawrence Ewhrudjakpo, Deputy Governor of Bayelsa State and Jennifer Adighije, CEO of Niger Delta Power Holding Company.

    Read Also: Fraser, Okorie, Roberts, others to speak at 2024 national leadership conference

    Others are Major General Garba Ayodeji Wahab, Director General of the Nigerian Army Resource Centre, Engr. Obi Uzu, Managing Director of Global Process and Pipeline Services Ltd (GPPSL); Prof. John Kennedy Opara, Chairman of CSS Group and Nkechi Ali-Balogun, Principal Consultant of NECCI Consulting.

    The list of speakers also include Dr. Daniel Moses, CEO of Property Wealth Corporation (PWC); Idoko Kingsley Ilonah, CEO of Lona Group; Florence Agogo, Founder of Florence Agogo; Ben Murray-Bruce, Founder of Silverbird Group: Dr. Frank Ugo Ogbuehi, CEO of Hugo Doors: Claudia Lumor, of Glitz Africa Magazine; Gisele Aklobessi, Principal CEO of Lumiere Group International; Mr. Chris Maiyaki, Executive Secretary of the Nigerian Universities Commission; and Linus Okorie MFR, Founder/CEO of GOTNI Leadership Centre.

    Okorie said this deficit is compounding the crippling debt profile the continent is facing, exacerbated by foreign loans sometimes disguised as aid from Western and Asian countries.

    He said these issues are often attributed to leadership failures and an inability to prudently manage the vast mineral resources available in many African nations.

  • Ebonyi South: Tribunal upholds Senator Okorie Ani’s election

    Ebonyi South: Tribunal upholds Senator Okorie Ani’s election

    The Election petition tribunal sitting in Abakaliki, Ebonyi State capital, has upheld the election of the Senator representing Ebonyi South Senatorial District in the National Assembly, Prof. Anthony Okorie Ani.

    In a judgement delivered on Thursday, the tribunal panel dismissed the petitions of the Labour Party (LP) candidate, Hon. Linus Abaa Okorie, and that of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Barr. Silas Onu. In a unanimous judgement, the tribunal ruled that the petitioners failed to substantiate their allegations of malpractices and irregularities against the APC candidate, and therefore, dismissed their petitions for lacking in merit.

    Fielding questions from newsmen after the court session, counsel to Senator Ani, Rou Nweze Umahi (SAN) noted that the judgement was in line with the law.

    He commended the tribunal for doing justice to the matter.

    Chairman of the All Progressives Congress (APC) in Ebonyi State,  Stanley Okoroemegha, in a reaction described the judgement as a victory for the Ebonyi State APC family.

    He emphatically stated that the people of Ebonyi South zone did not vote for the PDP and LP candidates during the election.

    Read Also: Violators of airport rules will face justice, FAAN vows

    He boasted that APC has come to stay in Ebonyi  State, and urged those who want to win elections in the future to join the winning party, and stop wasting their time in opposition.

    Chairman of Onicha Local Government Area,  Chidiebere Uzor, while reacting to the judgement described it as a true reflection of the wishes of the people of Ebonyi South Senatorial District.

    Uzor, who led other stakeholders to the tribunal, said the people of Ebonyi South zone only voted for Prof. Ani, and wondered why the LP and PDP candidates contested the outcome of the election.

    Also Speaking, a one-time Commissioner for Education in the state, Sunday Oyibe, said the judgement would help the Senator to concentrate in offering quality representation to the people.

    He commended Governor Francis Nwifuru; Minister of Works, Senator David Umahi; the Chairman of APC in Ebonyi State, Chief Stanley Okoroemegha, and other leaders and stakeholders of the party in the state for rallying support for Professor Ani during the electioneeringAni was elected to represent the zone in a by-election held on February 3rd 2024 after he polled 46,270 votes.

  • Okorie urges governors to fix tartan tracks across Southeast

    Okorie urges governors to fix tartan tracks across Southeast

    Athletics Federation of Nigeria (AFN) Performance Director, Victor Okorie, has urged the five South Eastern states, Governors  to fix  tartan tracks at the various stadia  in order to host AFN events.

    Okorie who is a representative of the South East on the board of the AFN,  decried the dilapidated state of facilities  for athletics at the stadia in Abia, Anambra, Ebonyi, Enugu and Imo States hence the clarion call on the Governors in the eastern region.

    “I want to appreciate the contributions of the South East State governors to the development of sports in the region. They have also provided stadiums to enhance the growth of sports. It is a big plus to them,” Okorie said to NationSport.

    “But the governors need to do more. There are stadia in the South East either privately or government owned but none is with a good tartan tracks that will ensure athletics events are held there as and when due.

    Read Also: Southeast residents ignore sit-at-home order storm Uzodimma’s inauguration

    “I salute the second term re-election of Governor Hope Uzodinma and his eventual swearing in on Monday, January 15th . He has shown he is a capacity governor who has the love of all sportsmen and women at heart. We will appreciate he uses his good office to put the tartan tracks of the Dan Anyiam Stadium, Owerri in good order.”

    Okorie also thumbed up the electoral victory of Governor Alex Otti (Abia), Francis Nwifuru (Ebonyi), Peter Mbah (Enugu) and Chukwuma Soludo (Anambra) but he charged them to help develop the stadiums in their domains to ensure AFN activities touch the South East also.

    The silver medallist at the 2003 COJA All African Games in 400m hurdles also hailed the Chairman, Imo Athletics Board, Chief Chris Onwuzurike for his true love, selfless service and energies for the development of Athletics in Nigeria and in Imo State.

    He also saluted  the Chairman, Anambra State Sports Development Commission, Mr. Patrick Onyedum for a job well done and his commission’s great effort to reposition sports in Anambra State with the support of Governor Charles Chukwuma Soludo.

  • Okorie why INEC can’t conduct poll to replace Umahi

    Okorie why INEC can’t conduct poll to replace Umahi

    The Labour Party (LP) senatorial candidate for Ebonyi South, Mr. Linus Okorie, has said it is illegal for the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), to plan or think of conducting a fresh election for the zone, when the matter of the 2023 general election is still pending in court.

    Okorie participated in the February 25, 2023 National Assembly Election, losing to David Umahi.

    He had sued Umahi and his party, the All Progressives Congress (APC),  for allegedly rigging, manipulating and perpetrating other irregularities in the election.

    Read Also: NADDC, Coscharis, Stallion, others back NAJA workshop

    Okorie, who spoke in Abakaliki, was reacting to rumours that INEC is purportedly planning to conduct a fresh election to replace former Governor Umahi, who resigned his position in the Senate to become the Minister of Works.

    Okorie, a two-time member of the House of Representatives, who represented Ohaozara, Onicha and Ivo federal constituency, described such rumoured fresh election for Ebonyi South by INEC as illegal.

    He said: “Today, the tribunal is sitting to adopt the final addresses of the parties. After today, they (tribunal) will reserve judgment. That may be next week.”

    He continued: “If that judgment is given, if the court decides that it was Umahi who won that election, then two things will happen; if nobody goes to Court of Appeal to challenge it, INEC will fix a date for a new election in which case, anybody can participate, but if the court didn’t rule that way, INEC can do nothing.

  • It’ll quell IPOB’s, MASSOB’s agitations,  says Nwodo, Ikedife, Okorie, others

    It’ll quell IPOB’s, MASSOB’s agitations, says Nwodo, Ikedife, Okorie, others

    The apex Igbo socio-cultural organisation, Ohaneze Ndigbo and other leaders of thought in the geopolitical zone have described restructuring as the only way to unifying the country.

    They declared that restructuring would quell the agitations of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Movement for the Actualisation of Sovereign State of Biafra (MASSOB) and other agitators.

    Those who spoke to The Nation in Anambra state include, President General of Ohanaeze Ndigbo, Chief Nnia Nwodo, former President General of the Igbo Group World-Wide, Dr Dozie Ikedife.

    Others are a professor of law and former Vice Chancellor of Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Ilochi Okafor (SAN), first Minister of Aviation in Nigeria, Chief Mbazulike Amechi.

    Also, the founder of All Progressives Grand Alliance (APGA) and currently, National Chairman of United Progressive Party (UPP), Chief Chekwas Okorie spoke in the same direction.

    For Nwodo, those campaigning against restructuring had painted an unfortunate and untrue picture that those in support of restructuring were doing so in order to deny the northern states who had not yet any proven oil reserves of the ability to survive.

    He said, “This is fortunate. The new model we propose for Nigeria recognizes that revenue in the world today is promoted by two main sources, namely, human capital development, leveraging on technology to drive the critical sectors of the economy and agriculture

    “Ten years ago the top 10 companies in the world were Mobil, Shell and Total. Today the top eight companies in the world are represented by technology related companies.

    “They include Apple, Microsoft, Google, Facebook and Amazon. The example of Netherlands in agriculture is also relevant here. This brings me to the question of what form Nigeria will assume under a restructured arrangement and how this restructuring can be brought about

    “Two basic models have been canvassed for restructuring, a conservative model aimed at maintaining the status quo has been proposed to mean simply a shedding of some of the executive powers of the federal government like issuing of mining licenses, permission for reconstructing of federal roads, and shedding of regulatory powers over investments in critical sectors of the economy.

    “This model merely scratches the surface of the problem. It avoids fundamental devolution of powers. The second model calls for a fundamental devolution of powers to the States as  federating units and lean federal government with exclusive powers for external defence, customs, immigration, foreign relations and a federal legislature and judiciary to make and interpret laws in these exclusive areas.

    “This second model purposes state at the federating units with different approaches. The first approach simply wants the states as the federating units and federal governments with limited powers.

    “It wants the states to control a percentage of revenue accruing from their areas and contribute an agreed percentage of such revenue to the federal government.

    “The second approach proposes the states as the federating units with a region at each of the six geopolitical units whose constitution will be agreed to and adopted by the states in the geopolitical region.

    “The regions will have the powers to merge existing States or create new ones. There will be regional and state legislatures and judiciary dealing with making and interpreting laws made in the respective political entities.

    “This approach proposes a revenue sharing formula of 15% to the federal government, 35% to the state government and 50% to the state governments. To achieve a national consensus on this subject requires a national discussion.

    “Regrettably the ruling party APC which promised restructuring in its manifesto after two years and four months in office is still appointing a committee to define what sort of restructuring it wants for Nigeria.

    “The only hope for change in Nigeria today is the rising call for restructuring pioneered by the Southern Leadership Forum supported lately by former Vice President Atiku Abubakar, former President Ibrahim Babangida and leaders of the middle belt including Dan Suleiman and Prof Jerry Gana.”

    “Our expectation is that now that our president is fully recovered and back to work, he will re-address the situation by constituting a nationwide conversation of all ethnic nationalities to look into the 2014 national conference report and trending views on this subject matter so as to come up with a consensus proposal that the national and the State Assemblies will be persuaded to adopt,” Nwodo said.

    Prof Okafor, said that as a student of constitutional law, no people with the diversities and conflicts that exist within us, had ever survived as a nation, unless in a very loose federation or confederation.

    “Suppressing violently the self determination groups is unlikely to kill the agitation for re-structuring. It is clear to me that Nigeria is doomed as a nation sooner or later, unless we re-structure and return to loose federation of regions.

    “We must listen to our youths. Their dissatisfaction is real, profound and deep. The political class that sit in the comforts of their mansions in Abuja, Lagos, Europe and USA, that have dual, sometimes triple citizenships, that visit us only on week-ends, and come elections, return home and buy their elections – you all must listen to the youths. NOW or NEVER.

    “Never before has any group in Nigeria brought to the fore, the imperativeness and urgency of re-structuring Nigeria. It is an achievement of historic proportions. But as the Ohas of Ohanaeze, you must find accommodation with the Ezes of Ohanaeze and other groups in Nigeria clamouring for Nigeria existing on the principles of justice, equity, fairness and integrity and free of corruption, hatred and zealotry” the law professor said.

    Speaking further, former President General of Ohanaeze Ndigbo worldwide, Dr Dozie Ikedife, said that if restructuring is done, it would quell all the agitations by the ethnic nationalities in the land, especially in the South East.

    He said the current structure is against some of the geopolitical zones in the land, adding that the country must restructure to correct some of the imbalances in the land.

    According to Ikedife, “any sensitive government must listen to the heart beat of its people; the essence of democracy is government of the people, for the people and of the people and not a group holding others at the jugular.

    “If we do the restructuring in the country as being proposed, it must be the panacea of all these agitations which must include resource control and it must touch the relationship between the states and the federal governments.

    “We do not want a primordial restructure that will be meaningless and without content,” the former presidential adviser to President Shehu Shagari on liaison in 1979 declared.

    Okorie declared that the benefits of restructuring would be immense on the lives of Ndigbo.

    He said they were clamouring for restructuring to correct what was damaged in Igbo land during and after the war including the roads in the region.

    Okorie said if the country was restructured, most of the things concentrated at the centre would now come to the federating units, adding that there were some certain things that would not be in the constitution.

    He said that the structures the country had currently was holding the system down, which according to him, had impeded development.

    The outspoken Igbo leader said that the APC government had divided Nigeria more than any other government that had ruled the country, adding that such arrangement would equally; stop the agitations by groups like IPOB, MASSOB and others.

    He maintained that the current structure being operated in Nigeria today encouraged laziness among the people and governments, adding that before the 1966 war, Igbo region was regarded as the fastest growing economy, noting that today, the region was nowhere in the country.

    In his own view, the former first aviation minister, Chief Mbazulike Amechi (aka The boy is good), said that Nigeria was being run as illegality.

    The octogenarian declared that the amendment of the constitution by the military after constitutional conferences in the land had helped in dividing the country the more.

    The elder statesman said the country today was being ruled without a people’s constitution, adding that restructuring would bring peace and progress.

    “We need to have a federation with each federating unit depending on its allocation and not running to Abuja each time and that will equally stop some of these problems we are witnessing today in the land and have our dilapidated roads in the region fixed,” Amechi said.

  • Mohammed, Babatode, Okorie take different positions

    Second Republic lawmaker Dr Junaid Muhammed has said where the President operates from doesn’t matter. According to him, the President can operate from his official residence or his hometown Daura or Mambilla Plateau.

    Junaid, who spoke on telephone, said: “The most important thing is that our President is back from medical vacation and he’s healthy enough to resume work. We should not be bothered about where he operates. He is healthy to tackle the myriad of national problems such as security, economy, and National Assembly.”

    He criticised those behind the release of information that President Buhari would be working from home. “They should be more mature with the kind of information they would be feeding the public about the President,” he stated.

    A former Minister of Transport and Aviation, Chief Ebenezer Babatope, said:  “All that I can say about this is that even if he will be working from his farm as long as the economy picks up well, that will not be a problem. He should give semblance of good governance; work on the economy to give Nigerians relief. He should be talking about healing the economy and not the military he spoke about. If he says he would work from his farm or bedroom, I think Nigerians should just allow him to do what he wants to do and support him.”

    But a legal scholar, Dr Ajibola Basiru, said  “if the President was fit to resume work, he should be ready to take full responsibility of his office. If he has not fully recovered, he should step aside and continue his medical vacation; allow the Vice President whom he had commended for doing a good job while he was away to continue in acting capacity.”

    United Progressives Party (UPP) National Chairman Chekwas Okorie described the move as “unprecedented”. This arrangement is definitely not the best and will bring retardation and stagnation to governance. The president believes it is still comfortable for him to be at the driver’s seat while oiling the machinery of governance at the detriment of the country. It certainly a very bad arrangement that will not add value to the country; it is like ruling Nigeria with a remote control and this is quite unthinkable.

    “If this line of action is followed, it means the President would be at home manning the lever of the vehicle, while the Vice President will be manning the steering of the vehicle. This has never happened anywhere in the world. The obvious consequences of this are that it will lead to retardation, retrogression and governance will be at low ebb. Nigeria is in a very serious critical situation.”

  • I’m confident Buhari will be great president- Okorie

    Following the current socio-economic and political pressure in the country, some Nigerians have expressed doubt over President Muhammadu Buhari’s ability to bring the much desired change.  But Chief Chekwas Okorie, the presidential candidate of United Progressive Party (UPP) in the 2015 election, thinks otherwise. He told Associate Editor, Sam Egburonu, that Buhari has what it takes to succeed

    BARELY 49 days to the first anniversary of President Muhammadu Buhari-led federal government, Nigerians are battling with harsh socio-economic pressure, a development that has led critics of the administration to express doubt over Mr. President’s ability to actualise the much desired change in the country. But one of the presidential candidates, who contested with Buhari in the last election, Chief Chekwas Okorie of the United Progressive Party (UPP), in an encounter, told The Nation that the current challenges notwithstanding, he still has confidence Buhari will deliver democracy dividends at the end of the day.

    “Let it be appreciated that the Buhari administration is one that has transited from a ruling political party, the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), to an erstwhile opposition political party, the All Progressive Congress (APC).  The PDP did not prepare for a defeat.  It was taken unawares and therefore caught napping.  Handing over power was not smooth.  Grappling with taking over the reins of power from an unprepared and an unwilling loser was a major challenge that the Buhari administration was confronted with.  This took its toll on the new administration.  It was understandable if Buhari’s presidency often referred to this as part of the reason for their late start.  The startling discoveries of monumental corruption, sordid and messed up records, could dislodge a new and inexperienced administration.  Since government is a continuum, Buhari is further saddled with implementing the already appropriated 2015/2016 Budget of ex-President Goodluck Jonathan administration,” he said.

    He added however, that “with nearly one year down the line, President Buhari can no longer be granted the benefit of further excuses.  It is time for him to begin to prove that his government has something to offer to Nigerians. I however remain confident that he will be on record as a great president.  He has the integrity, will-power and courage to take hard decisions that will ultimately lift Nigeria high on all fronts, socially and economically. He needs everybody’s co-operation at this time.”

    Expressing disappointment with the current state of politics and politicking in Nigeria, he said, “politics used to be robust and vibrant and the electorate used to look forward to the next election when they could renew the mandate of those who have served and represented them satisfactorily or vote out those who failed in delivering on their mandate.  The implication at the early period was that the electorates, who were the sovereigns, reserved the power to decide who was in power on their behalf and who was not.  Over the years, our politics and politicking began to deteriorate so rapidly, that at this point in time, our politics and politicking can best be described as rudimentary, pedestrian, uninspiring and nightmarish. Politics and politicking in Nigeria have become dangerous, brutish and do-or-die exercise.”

    He blamed the military coup of 1966, which he said halted the development and growth of our politics and revised the gain already recorded in deepening democratic practice and culture in Nigeria. “The quasi federalism that Nigeria enjoyed, based on regional structure was destabilized, and indeed replaced by the military that introduced a centralized government.

    Cry for self determination

    Okorie, who holds the traditional title of Ojeozi Ndigbo, also commented on the pressure that led to the rising cry for self determination in the South-East zone. As he puts it: “The Biafra-Nigeria War formally ended in January 1970, about 46 years ago. The victorious Nigerian Government declared that the war ended on a note of No victor-No vanquished.  To further give the impression of magnanimity in victory, the then Head of State of Nigeria, General Yakubu Gowon, also declared a policy of Reconciliation, Reconstruction and Rehabilitation (3R) in favour of the former Biafrans, which covered the people of the defunct Eastern Region:  All the aforementioned federal government postures were largely observed in the breach.  To make matters worse for the defeated people, obnoxious policies were enunciated and in some cases promulgated into laws to marginalize mostly the Igbo people of present South-East geopolitical zone.

    “As these policies and laws began to take their toll on national development, unity, economy and security, the people of the South-South, South-West and recently North-Central geo-political zones joined the South-East to clamour for the restructuring of the Nigerian polity to allow for true federalism. Calls for national or constitutional conference to address these issues were unheeded or in some cases truncated.  Twenty nine years after the end of the civil war, some restive youths, mainly of Igbo extraction, embarked on the clamour for exit from Nigeria back to Biafra.  Their agitations were ignored and scorned derisively.  The failure of subsequent Nigerian governments to address their grievances resulted in the emergence of several variants of the agitation, resulting in violent clashes with government forces in some cases.  The protests have been carried out in about 180 countries, thereby internationalizing the agitation for a separate state of Biafra from Nigeria.  The agitation for a separate State of Biafra and the clamour for self-determination by other sections have become wide-spread and sustained.”

    Asked if realisation of the Biafran dream will not make a mockery of the efforts of those who fought for the unity of the country, he said, “the efforts at unification will certainly be in vain unless such efforts lead to the unity of Nigerian nation states and their peoples. It is a big fallacious provision in the Nigerian Constitution that Nigeria’s unity is indivisible and indissoluble.  No human contraption can ever be indivisible and indissoluble.  Even marriage, which is the oldest institution established by God, can only be sustained if it is serviced by love predicated on mutual respect, fidelity, trust, sacrifice, tolerance, etc.

    “National unity in a country as diverse and as heterogeneous as Nigeria can only be sustained  and nurtured as a nation if there is equity, justice, fairness, equality, security, welfare of its people, etc.

    The way out

    Acknowledging the unfortunate situation Okorie however believes it is not beyond redemption. “I dire say time appears to be running out on Nigeria, unless the Buhari administration is able to rise to the occasion. I strongly recommend the implementation of the recommendations of the previous national conference and the convocation of another one to continue from where that one stopped.

    “I believe our politics and politicking can only be sanitised and moderated if and when eligible voters who are the true sovereigns are restored their inalienable right to freely vote into various elective offices men and women of their choice:  This can be facilitated by adopting the Electronic Voting System in subsequent general elections.  Already, Nigeria has acquired Electronic Voters Register and Electronic Voters’ Cards.  All that is required to smoothly transit to Electronic Voting System is the enabling legislation.

    “Restructuring the Nigerian federation into definable federating units and devolution of powers to make the control of the centre less attractive is another way to elevate our politics and deepen our democracy.

    On what he would have done if he was the one occupying Buhari’s seat today, he said, “I will dig deep into my 2015 Presidential Manifesto which I robustly canvassed during the presidential campaigns and at the 2015 Presidential Debate where I squared up with former President Goodluck Jonathan and others.  I will tackle corruption with the same zeal and passion President Buhari is confronting it.  I will without delay initiate the convocation of a national conference with a view to restructuring Nigeria to make the country more accommodating, devolution of power and permit the federating units to develop at their own pace.  I will introduce state police and community policing to make every citizen a stakeholder in security matters.  I will declare a state of emergency in electricity supply and provision of road and railway infrastructure.  I will revisit the post-war policy of reconstruction, rehabilitation and reconciliation.  I will embark on comprehensive electoral reforms with a view to going electronic and restoring confidence in the democratic process.”

  • I’m confident Buhari will  be great president- Okorie

    I’m confident Buhari will be great president- Okorie

    Following the current socio-economic and political pressure in the country, some Nigerians have expressed doubt over President Muhammadu Buhari’s ability to bring the much desired change.  But Chief Chekwas Okorie, the presidential candidate of United Progressive Party (UPP) in the 2015 election, thinks otherwise. He told Associate Editor, Sam Egburonu, that Buhari has what it takes to succeed

    BARELY 49 days to the first anniversary of President Muhammadu Buhari-led federal government, Nigerians are battling with harsh socio-economic pressure, a development that has led critics of the administration to express doubt over Mr. President’s ability to actualise the much desired change in the country. But one of the presidential candidates, who contested with Buhari in the last election, Chief Chekwas Okorie of the United Progressive Party (UPP), in an encounter, told The Nation that the current challenges notwithstanding, he still has confidence Buhari will deliver democracy dividends at the end of the day.

    “Let it be appreciated that the Buhari administration is one that has transited from a ruling political party, the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), to an erstwhile opposition political party, the All Progressive Congress (APC).  The PDP did not prepare for a defeat.  It was taken unawares and therefore caught napping.  Handing over power was not smooth.  Grappling with taking over the reins of power from an unprepared and an unwilling loser was a major challenge that the Buhari administration was confronted with.  This took its toll on the new administration.  It was understandable if Buhari’s presidency often referred to this as part of the reason for their late start.  The startling discoveries of monumental corruption, sordid and messed up records, could dislodge a new and inexperienced administration.  Since government is a continuum, Buhari is further saddled with implementing the already appropriated 2015/2016 Budget of ex-President Goodluck Jonathan administration,” he said.

    He added however, that “with nearly one year down the line, President Buhari can no longer be granted the benefit of further excuses.  It is time for him to begin to prove that his government has something to offer to Nigerians. I however remain confident that he will be on record as a great president.  He has the integrity, will-power and courage to take hard decisions that will ultimately lift Nigeria high on all fronts, socially and economically. He needs everybody’s co-operation at this time.”

    Expressing disappointment with the current state of politics and politicking in Nigeria, he said, “politics used to be robust and vibrant and the electorate used to look forward to the next election when they could renew the mandate of those who have served and represented them satisfactorily or vote out those who failed in delivering on their mandate.  The implication at the early period was that the electorates, who were the sovereigns, reserved the power to decide who was in power on their behalf and who was not.  Over the years, our politics and politicking began to deteriorate so rapidly, that at this point in time, our politics and politicking can best be described as rudimentary, pedestrian, uninspiring and nightmarish. Politics and politicking in Nigeria have become dangerous, brutish and do-or-die exercise.”

    He blamed the military coup of 1966, which he said halted the development and growth of our politics and revised the gain already recorded in deepening democratic practice and culture in Nigeria. “The quasi federalism that Nigeria enjoyed, based on regional structure was destabilized, and indeed replaced by the military that introduced a centralized government.

    Cry for self determination

    Okorie, who holds the traditional title of Ojeozi Ndigbo, also commented on the pressure that led to the rising cry for self determination in the South-East zone. As he puts it: “The Biafra-Nigeria War formally ended in January 1970, about 46 years ago. The victorious Nigerian Government declared that the war ended on a note of No victor-No vanquished.  To further give the impression of magnanimity in victory, the then Head of State of Nigeria, General Yakubu Gowon, also declared a policy of Reconciliation, Reconstruction and Rehabilitation (3R) in favour of the former Biafrans, which covered the people of the defunct Eastern Region:  All the aforementioned federal government postures were largely observed in the breach.  To make matters worse for the defeated people, obnoxious policies were enunciated and in some cases promulgated into laws to marginalize mostly the Igbo people of present South-East geopolitical zone.

    “As these policies and laws began to take their toll on national development, unity, economy and security, the people of the South-South, South-West and recently North-Central geo-political zones joined the South-East to clamour for the restructuring of the Nigerian polity to allow for true federalism. Calls for national or constitutional conference to address these issues were unheeded or in some cases truncated.  Twenty nine years after the end of the civil war, some restive youths, mainly of Igbo extraction, embarked on the clamour for exit from Nigeria back to Biafra.  Their agitations were ignored and scorned derisively.  The failure of subsequent Nigerian governments to address their grievances resulted in the emergence of several variants of the agitation, resulting in violent clashes with government forces in some cases.  The protests have been carried out in about 180 countries, thereby internationalizing the agitation for a separate state of Biafra from Nigeria.  The agitation for a separate State of Biafra and the clamour for self-determination by other sections have become wide-spread and sustained.”

    Asked if realisation of the Biafran dream will not make a mockery of the efforts of those who fought for the unity of the country, he said, “the efforts at unification will certainly be in vain unless such efforts lead to the unity of Nigerian nation states and their peoples. It is a big fallacious provision in the Nigerian Constitution that Nigeria’s unity is indivisible and indissoluble.  No human contraption can ever be indivisible and indissoluble.  Even marriage, which is the oldest institution established by God, can only be sustained if it is serviced by love predicated on mutual respect, fidelity, trust, sacrifice, tolerance, etc.

    “National unity in a country as diverse and as heterogeneous as Nigeria can only be sustained  and nurtured as a nation if there is equity, justice, fairness, equality, security, welfare of its people, etc.

    The way out

    Acknowledging the unfortunate situation Okorie however believes it is not beyond redemption. “I dire say time appears to be running out on Nigeria, unless the Buhari administration is able to rise to the occasion. I strongly recommend the implementation of the recommendations of the previous national conference and the convocation of another one to continue from where that one stopped.

    “I believe our politics and politicking can only be sanitised and moderated if and when eligible voters who are the true sovereigns are restored their inalienable right to freely vote into various elective offices men and women of their choice:  This can be facilitated by adopting the Electronic Voting System in subsequent general elections.  Already, Nigeria has acquired Electronic Voters Register and Electronic Voters’ Cards.  All that is required to smoothly transit to Electronic Voting System is the enabling legislation.

    “Restructuring the Nigerian federation into definable federating units and devolution of powers to make the control of the centre less attractive is another way to elevate our politics and deepen our democracy.

    On what he would have done if he was the one occupying Buhari’s seat today, he said, “I will dig deep into my 2015 Presidential Manifesto which I robustly canvassed during the presidential campaigns and at the 2015 Presidential Debate where I squared up with former President Goodluck Jonathan and others.  I will tackle corruption with the same zeal and passion President Buhari is confronting it.  I will without delay initiate the convocation of a national conference with a view to restructuring Nigeria to make the country more accommodating, devolution of power and permit the federating units to develop at their own pace.  I will introduce state police and community policing to make every citizen a stakeholder in security matters.  I will declare a state of emergency in electricity supply and provision of road and railway infrastructure.  I will revisit the post-war policy of reconstruction, rehabilitation and reconciliation.  I will embark on comprehensive electoral reforms with a view to going electronic and restoring confidence in the democratic process.”

  • Why UPP is championing Electronic voting system – Okorie

    Why UPP is championing Electronic voting system – Okorie

    In this interview with Associate Editor, Sam Egburonu, Chief Chekwas Okorie, the National Chairman of United Progressives Party ( UPP) explains why his party is passionate over adoption of Electronic Voters System. He also spoke on other national issues. Excerpts

    2015 is around the corner and already there is controversy over the way INEC’s is distributing the Permanent Voters Register. How would you assess INEC preparations for the 2015 elections?

    My personal assessment is that the present leaders of INEC is doing better in conducting elections than all the INEC leaderships I have witnessed in this country. INEC is doing better. It is doing better in terms of preparation, in terms of carrying all the stakeholders along. They are also trying to respond to criticisms by attempting some changes to make their performance better. So, there has been some noticeable improvement. Unfortunately, the Anambra election that took place in November 3, just last year, was a disaster; such a disaster that it cast so much doubt. It was as if the commission had done so many kilometres backwards. I think that also jolted them to some realities and they came back to do something better. We saw improvement on the Ekiti election and Osun. This is an indication that 2015, which is a big one, would be better than the previous general elections that we have had. To that extent, I want to give INEC some bit of credit, hoping again that certain measures, which the UPP, the party that I lead, has suggested, which has received the attention of the National Assembly, will be embraced by INEC. By this I mean the Electronic Voting System, The electronic voting system was more or less championed by the UPP, right from the very day of our registration as a political party. We began to canvass it; using every official interaction we had with INEC. In fact, we wrote a memo on it to Mr. President, the President of Senate; the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the Chairman of INEC himself. We didn’t get any reply, no response, no acknowledgement. So, we decided to do the same memo to every member of the National Assembly. We are happy that when the Senate considered that aspect of the provision of the Electoral Act, the Senate did exactly what we wanted them to do; to expunge session 52:2 which restrained INEC from using Electronic Voting System. And why are we passionate about this system? We are passionate about this system because it is the only system that is feasible to be used now that we already have Electronic Register, electronically generated voters card and the basic infrastructure to transit to it. And it is the only system that will eliminate the use of thugs; it will eliminate the use of ballot papers to a large extent; there will be no ballot boxes to a large extent; people can vote with their GSM telephones; those who cannot send text messages, because it is just like sending an SMS can then go the polling booth to vote manually. This way; those who registered their biodata in Maiduguri and have relocated to Lagos as a result of the security challenges of the country can still vote and his vote will count where they registered. One can voteVote from the comfort of his home or work place without having to queue and be exposed to the danger of being bombed or attacked by terrorists. There will be no use for thugs because there will be no job for them to do. Nigeria will not have to declare work-free day on election days with the attendant opportunity costs to our economy; participation will be between 80, 90 and 95 percent unlike now that we have just maximum 25 percent participation, which by any stretch of imagination cannot be regarded as legitimate, if you have that low level of participation. These are just some of the advantages that we highlighted and we made sure every member of the National Assembly had a copy of the memo. And on the day of the debate, a Senator from Zamfara State, whom we didn’t even meet personally, only read our memo as his position as it was carried without debate. So, what is left now is for Nigerians to join in putting pressure on INEC to adopt Electronic Voting System. It can be adopted; it is feasible, the infrastructure is there. It is only the ruling political party that lacks the will power to submit itself to the ordinary people for the next election because what is simply means is that the people will now be able to determine who will preside over their affairs; to manipulate the system becomes a Herculean task.

    But it must have some disadvantages. For example, in the present day Nigeria an individual can own 10 telephone lines with different names. Why are you presenting this thing as if Nigerians will not find a way to manipulate it? One can register with different names.

    No you can’t. You can disguise your face you can lay claims to 10 different names but you cannot have 10 finger prints. You can only have one finger print. When we talk of biodata it includes even your eye contact because there is photograph. Remember that the Electronic Voters Register now has been dictating those who registered twice with different photographs. That’s what Obiano did. Obiano changed his dress, registered in two or three different places and those things appeared at the Voters Register and he was shown to have done multiple registration. So, even if you disguise your face, you cannot disguise your finger print.

    Secondly, third world countries have been using it. Ghana has used it twice and there has not been complaint about manipulation of the technology. Indonesia is using it. These are third world countries. India, with a population of over 60 million voters; that’s what they used, not to talk of developed countries and Nigeria is technologically more advanced than most of the third world country already using it. So what is just holding us back is the fear of the masses, because the masses are not irrational; what we see, written as election results are not the wishes of the people. We also have enough time now to make that transition, and it will make the work of INEC easier. We don’t need all these security people marching everywhere. I know that APC has strong complaint about intimidation of their people in Ekiti and Osun. If we use Electronic Voting System all these will not happen and as you are voting, the result will be captured instantaneously across the board; from voting booth to the ward up there. The issue of late arrival of sensitive materials will not arise; late return of result will not arise; litigation will be minimized. So why can’t Nigeria adopt that and let us have a peaceful election for once. Even INEC told us in interactions they had with political parties, not only UPP, that the only thing holding them from using Electronic Voting System was the legal provision that should had now been expunged by the Senate.

    Given the security situation, if the Electronic Voting System is not adopted in 2015, it will be dangerous to go out to vote, especially in the North-East. What do you envisage?

    If the Electronic Voting System is not adopted and the security situation remains as it is in 2015, it is certain that a lot of people, in the security endangered area who cannot go out to vote would be disenfranchised; not that the government want them to be disenfranchised but because the situation will make them to keep away for their own safety because they do not believe the present crop of politicians are worth dying for. That will be unfortunate because it will amount to the same situation where about 25 percent will vote and we claim it is a legitimate result.

    What is your impression of the National Conference, which has just ended. Is it a waste of time as many said on the outset that it would be?

    I was one of the people that said then that it would be a waste of time. It has not turned out to be a waste of time and resources. It has exposed quite a lot. It has exposed how unpatriotic so many Nigerians can be. Nigerian present structure was designed by fiat. Military government created states and local governments that made everything lopsided. They put in policies that alienated certain parts of the country. They created local government structure that defied logic, they created policies that made landmass a basis for revenue distribution; state creation that has nothing to do with viability. For instance, by 1963, when Nigeria became a Republic, based on creation of the colonial masters who considered the hard realities on ground, the Western Region had nine provinces, the Eastern Region had 12 provinces and the whole North had 14 provinces. So, the South had 21 provinces with the North having 14 provinces. But the moment the military came in, the first thing General Yakubu Gowon administration did was to create 12 states, giving six to North and six to the South, thus making the North and South equal. From there, they began to give the North some advantages to the point that today we have 36 states with 19 in the North and 17 in the South, excluding Abuja. There was no dialogue, to discuss the reason for this. As a result tension has been building up and people have been calling for a dialogue for equity.