Tag: Olisa Agbakoba

  • Devolution should be agenda for 2027, by Agbakoba

    Devolution should be agenda for 2027, by Agbakoba

    Presidential candidates for 2027 election should make devolution a priority for them to command voter acceptability, legal luminary Dr. Olisa Agbakoba (SAN) said yesterday.

    Apart from restructuring, he said the electorate should elicit cogent promise from them on the need for a new constitution, state police with operational independence, resource control with minimum 50 per cent derivation, implementation of the Oronsanye report on the merger or scrapping of 541 agencies, and divestment from all commercial enterprises by government.

    Agbakoba also said the candidates should demonstrate commitment towards maritime and aviation sector legislative reforms, justice sector transformation for contract enforcement, critical minerals and space industry development, and agricultural transformation unlocking N15 trillion exports.

    He told reporters in Lagos that the anticipatory elements of devolution and restructuring should be closely associated with regionalism.

    Read Also: Sexual harassment: Agbakoba demands retraction by Natasha

    Noting that the Federal Government is overwhelmed, Agbakoba wondered why a single person – the minister of works – should be the one to build all roads in Nigeria.

    He said: “We should make devolution an issue on the ballot in 2027. We should ask the candidates what is your agenda for devolution.”

    The eminent lawyer recalled that during the 2014 National Conference in Abuja, the delegates agreed that the country was a 20-storey building with a shaky foundation, adding that it was discovered that 26 states could not economically survive.

    Emphasising that regionalism is the answer, Agbakoba said Premier Obafemi Awolowo ran the defunct Western Region better than what the six governors are currently doing.

    He said the electioneering is on without the big elephant in the room being confronted, insisting that the big elephant is restructuring or devolution.

    Agbakoba said the macro-economic stability being projected by the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) and the Federal Ministry of Finance has not led to a big relief for the masses in terms of real price reduction.

  • Tinubu should refocus natural resources governance, says Agbakoba 

    Tinubu should refocus natural resources governance, says Agbakoba 

    …seeks adoption of development oil approach

    Legal luminary, Olisa Agbakoba (SAN) has called for a new natural resources governance structure and the review of the oil and gas legal frameworks as the baseline for repositioning the sensitive sector. 

    He said Nigerians have been fooled by the Petroleum Industry Act (PIA), lamenting that its implementation has not yielded the desired results. 

    Agbakoba, former President of the Nigeria Bar Association (NBA), also said there is no difference between the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation Limited (NNPCL), and Nigerian National Petroleum Company (NNPC), saying that they are the same. 

    He said it does not matter if the state controls oil and gas, adding that what is important is the impact of that management on the well-being of Nigerians. 

    Agbakoba vowed to challenge in court the scheme cheating the joint ventures, stressing that any joint ownership with the International Oil Companies (IOCs) contradicts the constitution. 

    The eminent lawyer spoke with reporters in Lagos on “Rethinking Nigeti’s oil and gas governance.”

    He said Sections 16 and 4r of the Constitution, which vests the control on the government of the federation do not permit joint ownership. 

    He urged the federal government to emulate the Development Oil Approach adopted by Saudi Arabia, where the so-called partners limit their participation to providing service. 

    Agbakoba said the dismantling of the existing legal framework has become necessary because the contract sharing between the Federal Government and the IOCs has not benefitted Nigerians. 

    He said it was lamentable that the sector was being ceded to foreign companies. 

    Agbakoba queried: “The values of the IOCs should not overwhelm our own interests. Nigeria is the sixth largest producer of oil. Where is the benefit?

    Noting that Nigerian oil is to the advantage of foreigners and not Nigerians, he said if the IOCs leave, there are capable Nigerians who can replace them. 

    Agbakoba said Nigerians should retrieve their inheritance from the firm grip of non-Nigerians. 

    He also urged President Bola Tinubu to appoint a minister of petroleum, saying that the work of the president is enormous. 

    He said Nigeria needs a minister of petroleum who can effectively supervise the sector.

    Read Also: FG repatriates 190 Nigerians from UAE

    Agbakoba added: “Oil is being paid for borrowing. What are the effects on the common man? What is the result? The service provider is elevated to the status of a co-owner. We are flaring gas. The incompetence in the management of the crisis in the oil sector is bigger than corruption.”

    The rights activist said even though Nigeria has proven reserves of 37 billion barrels of oil and 188 trillion cubic feet of gas, this abundance of natural resources has not translated into broad-based economic development and improved living standards for the majority of Nigerians.

    He lamented that the country has continued to grapple with what economists call the “resource curse” or the “paradox of plenty.”

    He stressed:” This phenomenon is characterized by countries rich in natural resources, particularly non-renewable resources like minerals and fuels, experiencing less economic growth, less democracy, and worse development outcomes compared to countries with fewer natural resources. In Nigeria, this is manifested by high poverty rates, inadequate infrastructure, and uneven economic development.”

    Agbakoba lauded recent initiatives by President Tinubu, including the Accelerated Stabilization and Advancement Plan aimed at injecting N2 trillion into the economy over six months.

    Noting that the plan is to mitigate the impact of the removal of fuel subsidy and the liberalization of the foreign exchange market, he said more reforms are required. 

    Agbakoba called for a shift from the “Contract Oil Approach” to the “Development Oil Approach,” to end the government’s passive style and uncontrolled dominance by international oil companies. He said NNPCL cannot afford to remain a passive partner. 

    He drew attention to massive capital flight “as profit of oil does not stay in the country,” but transferred out of Nigeria by IOCs through payments to foreign contractors and service providers, use of foreign banks for transactions, and repatriation of profits to IOC home countries.

    Describing the contract oil model as a violation of the Constitutional Mandate, he said: “The Contract Oil model stands in direct contradiction to Sections 16 and 44(3) of the Nigerian Constitution. These provisions explicitly mandate the government to manage Nigeria’s natural resources in a manner that secures the maximum welfare, freedom, and happiness of every citizen. The current arrangement, which primarily benefits International Oil Companies (IOCs), falls far short of this constitutional requirement.”

    He added: “The outsourcing of oil and gas management to IOCs through Joint Ventures (JVs) and Production Sharing Contracts (PSCs) may constitute an unlawful delegation of governmental authority. It is a fundamental principle of administrative law that statutory bodies, including the government, cannot delegate their core functions without express legal authorization. In the absence of such express authority, the current arrangements may be ultra vires and potentially void.”

    Agbakoba frowned at the inconsistent application of ownership principles, saying: “While the Federal Government is reluctant to consider shared or joint ownership with state governments, who represent Nigerians more directly), it sees no issue in delegating, outsourcing, and sharing joint ownership with IOCs.”

    In his view, “the dominance of IOCs in the sector has historically limited opportunities for developing local content and building domestic capacity in the oil and gas industry.”

    Agbakoba said a paradigm shift to the “Development Oil” option would foster active state participation unlike the contract system and boost value addition, including the development of local refining capacity, establishment of petrochemical industries and creation of downstream industries that use oil and gas as raw materials.”

    Emphasising the import of “Local Content Development,” he said:  “Development Oil prioritizes the development of local content, aiming to build domestic capacity in all aspects of the oil and gas value chain. This includes training the local workforce, developing local technology, and promoting Nigerian-owned businesses in the sector.”

    He added: “While not excluding foreign partnerships, Development Oil seeks to redefine these relationships. Instead of passive JVs or PSCs, it aims for partnerships that prioritize technology transfer, skills development, and mutual benefits aligned with Nigeria’s national interests.

    “There is a need to review and potentially revise existing Joint Venture agreements and Production Sharing Contracts with International Oil Companies (IOCs). Current agreements have effectively delegated the inherent rights of Nigerians to IOCs, allowing them to extract significant portions of Nigeria’s resources while leaving Nigerian citizens with comparatively little benefit. This practice raises serious concerns about the protection of national interests and the fulfillment of constitutional obligations.”

    Agbakoba said the government should develop new models for engagement with IOCs that prioritize technology transfer, local content development, and value addition within Nigeria, rather than mere resource extraction.

    He called for a new governance framework centred on development along the pattern of Saudi Arabia and novel legislative and structural changes, particularly the repeal or amendment of the Petroleum Industry Act (PIA) as “Section 64 (c) of PIA conflicts with Section 162 (1) of the Nigerian Constitution.”

    The legal luminary also advised the government to “explore innovative funding mechanisms, such as a Sovereign Oil Fund guaranteed by oil reserves, to finance strategic investments in the sector and related industries.”

    He said: “This approach would allow Nigeria to leverage its proven reserves as collateral for borrowing, similar to how IOCs currently operate.

    “This will enable Nigeria to fund its own oil and gas operations without relying on foreign companies. Through this process, retain the entire value chain (exploration, production, refining, distribution, shipping, and marketing) in oil and gas, as Saudi Arabia has done successfully.”

    He said the government should invest in capacity building for Nigerian oil and gas companies to enable them to take on larger roles in the sector, reducing dependence on IOCs, adding that a significant portion of oil and gas revenue should be reinvested in diversifying the economy and developing non-oil sectors.

    Agbakoba said the government should establish special economic zones focused on oil and gas-related industries to attract investment and create jobs.

    Highlighting the benefits of the Development Approach, he said it will lead to economic diversification and growth, job creation, increased Gross Domestic Product (GDP), improved infrastructure energy security, improved transportation networks, industrial development, educational development, and environmental sustainability.

    Noting that a reformed governance structure will minimize opportunities for corruption and mismanagement, he added that a well-managed oil and gas sector will enhance Nigeria’s reputation in the international community. 

    Agbakoba stressed: “Rethinking Nigeria’s oil and gas governance is not just crucial; it is a constitutional imperative. 

    “The current system of JVs and PSCs, originally justified by a lack of funds, now appears to violate the inherent rights of Nigerians over their natural resources. By adopting a “Development Oil” approach, Nigeria can reclaim control over its vital oil and gas sector and transform it into a powerful engine for national development.

    “This paradigm shift requires bold policy changes, including the securitization of oil reserves through a Sovereign Oil Fund, which would allow Nigeria to finance its own oil and gas operations. It also calls for a re-evaluation of existing agreements with IOCs that have effectively outsourced decision-making and control over Nigerian resources.

    “The current exit of IOCs presents both a challenge and an opportunity for new Nigerian actors in the oil and gas sector. In collaboration with the federal government, these actors must rise to the occasion and build a new strategy for oil and gas exploration based on development oil principles.

    “By aligning the oil and gas sector with broader national interests and constitutional obligations, Nigeria can create a more diversified, resilient, and prosperous economy that truly benefits the generality of Nigerians.”

  • How Tinubu can make impact, by Agbakoba

    How Tinubu can make impact, by Agbakoba

    • ‘We need more ministers like Wike, Keyamo’

    The former President of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA), Dr. Olisa Agbakoba (SAN) spoke on the first year of President Bola Tinubu and how the administration can succeed in the implementation of its bold reforms for repositioning the country. Excerpts by EMMANUEL OLADESU.

    Olisa Agbakoba, former President of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA), said President Tinubu will make more impact if there is the administration can do five things.

    He said the Federal Government should ensure regular power supply, refocus its security architecture, insist on efficiency in government,  create job opportunities  and maintain close communication with stakeholders.

    Agbakoba assessed Tinubu’s performance in the last one year, using the standard set by United States  President Franklin D. Roosevelt (FDR), who took decisive and transformative actions in his first 100 Days, setting a benchmark for evaluating presidents.

    He recalled that FDR’s New Deal policies addressed the Great Depression with unprecedented urgency, scale, and specificity, creating millions of jobs, launching massive public works projects, and establishing new institutions that reshaped the American economy and society.

    Agbakoba noted that in his first year in office, President Tinubu made notable progress in many areas outlined in his “Renewed Hope” campaign manifestos.

    The President has tried to refocus the economy by removing fuel subsidy and floated exchange rate to save costs and unify FX markets, despite short-term pains. He also provided welfare palliatives, established bodies to facilitate consumer credit and student loans,  and set up a tax reforms committee.

    On security, Tinubu approved a committee on modalities for state police, invested in military equipment and food security measures.

    On governance,  he signed a new Electricity Act allowing states and private players in the power sector.

    Tinubu also set out to fight the infrastructure battle by securing funding for major seaport, rail, road, and power plant projects.

    On foreign policy, the President positioned Nigeria as a stabilising force in the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS), boosted FDI inflows over $15 billion and enforced bilateral air routes for Nigerian airlines.

    In the oil and gas sector, he is rehabilitating refineries and incentivizing new private refineries.

    “President Tinubu’s first year in office has laid the groundwork for significant progress, with notable achievements in various sectors. The right policy choices have been put in place, but implementation has been the challenge,” Agbakoba said.

    To fully realize his transformative vision and deliver on his campaign promises, it is crucial for the government to focus on key areas that will make the most impact, such as security, power, and an emergency industrial revolution. If Tinubu can solve these critical issues, it will release kinetic energy and accelerate progress,” he added.

    Read Also: Lamorde, EFCC brain box exits

    Agbakoba said there is a need for the government to increase its pace, pointing out that the current pace of implementation is slow.

    He said the nation would like to see the same urgency and decisiveness demonstrated by FDR during his first 100 days, urging the President to lead from the front, setting the tone and driving the execution of his agenda with unwavering commitment.

    Noting that President cannot do it alone, Agbakoba said his ministers should also be up and doing. He urged other ministers to emulate their Federal Capital Territory (FCT) counterpart, Nyesom Wike, who he described as the performance prize winner in the cabinet. “He is passionate. We need more Wikes in government. We need passion and energy. Festus Keyamo is another minister, who through his reforms will make Aviation to create job opportunities for Nigerians, “ stressed

    Agbakoba said there should no room for tea party or business as usual, adding that “if anybody in government is unable to cross that line of passion, he should be out.”

    The legal luminary urged the president to refocus the security architecture, saying that “conventional armies cannot win this type of war.” He recalled United States lost in Vietnam for the same reason. “Nigeria is insecure. The tools are wrong,” he said.  because the tools were wrong.

    Agbakoba suggested that Tinubu should establish a ‘foundation for national order.’ He said the theory of  Nigeria’s indivisibility is wrong, emphasising that the country is not indisoluble. In his view, there is need for Nigerians to agree to live together. This, he said, can be determined by a prescibite. Agbakoba said there is no need to entertain fear because despite the fuss in Scotland, after the referendum, majority insisted on being part of the United Kingdom.

    “Tinubu must prioritize establishing a strong foundation of national order, unity, peace, and stability as a prerequisite for sustainable development.

    “He should facilitate a historic agreement akin to the Treaty of Westphalia by engaging with ethnic groups, the National Assembly, and diverse stakeholders to resolve fundamental questions around Nigeria’s political identity and arrangements for living together as one united entity,” he said.

    Economy should be the major priority. Agbakoba said the only way to strengthen the value of the Naira is produce. He believes that if there is power, it would be easy to create employment. He also believes that business will flourish if power outage and insecurity are resolved. “Nigerians are extremely angry because they are hungry. The psychology of crime is not in-born; it is environmental.  The poverty level is more than we can imagine.,” he said.

    Agbakoba alluded to the imbalance between the macro-economic pillars of monetary policy and fiscal policy. He observed that the Central Bank of Nigeria  (CBN) is overconcerned with the numeric value of the Naira. He said “it is the finance months should put money in the economy to conquer hunger. CBN should concentrate on the financial system stability.”

    The former NBA president suggested that the minister of finance should hold a town hall meeting to know the pulse of the people  because “hungry people are angry people.”

    He added:”The minister of finance should concentrate on the productive value. The manufacturing sector should be revived. There is need to do away with multiple taxes, inconsistent policies.

    “We need steady, consistent policy and efficiency in government. Ordinary titling of property is hectic. Ninety percent of properties in Lagos cannot be accounted for. They have no value. Failed land tenure impacts negatively on the economy.

    Agbakoba said  drawing from recommendations in the OAL’s 2024 policy report, Tinubu has an opportunity to implement a sweeping New Deal-style economic recovery plan. He said this would involve enacting targeted reforms and sector strategies aimed at revenue generation, job creation, infrastructure development, and GDP growth across areas like maritime, aviation, space, financial services, oil/gas, mining, agriculture, and manufacturing. If implemented effectively, Agbakoba said this could generate N100 trillion and over four million jobs.

    The legal luminary urged Tinubu to strengthen governance through constitutional reforms. He said: “Tinubu has a major opportunity to overhaul Nigeria’s governance framework by spearheading the replacement of the 1999 Constitution with a new constitution that devolves powers, promotes unity, and strengthens democratic institutions.

    “This constitutional reform process can incorporate public service reforms, judicial reforms, and measures to empower regulatory agencies for long-term good governance.

    To accelerate progress, the report recommends collaborating closely with the National Assembly, engaging stakeholders to build consensus, and prioritizing execution with clear targets and accountability.

    “President Tinubu must lead from the front, demonstrating the same urgency and decisiveness that defined FDR’s transformative first 100 days in office. By focusing on critical areas like security, power, and an emergency industrial revolution, while increasing the pace of implementation, Tinubu can unlock Nigeria’s potential and deliver on his promise of renewed hope for the nation.”

  • Accept defeat in good faith, Agbakoba tells Atiku

    Popular lawyer Olisa Agbakoba has urged presidential candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party in last Saturday’s election, Atiku Abubakar to accept his defeat in good faith.

    He told him not to contest the results in the court but cement his place as a statesman by working to galvanise the PDP and third forces for the political struggles ahead.

    In a paper titled ‘2019 Presidential Election: Ethnic Consideration vs Governance Consideration’ on Wednesday, the Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN) said: “I understand the PDP is aggrieved at the outcome of the election and alleged massive irregularities.

    “I urge former Vice President Atiku Abubakar not to approach the Election Petition Tribunal.

    “He might have (been) moved backwards by his loss but he should not lose sight of the legacy and greatness that lie in front of him.”

    Read Also: ACF to Atiku: concede defeat, congratulate Buhari

    Urging Atiku to work with others to build a stronger political structure that can win in the next dispensation, Agbakoba said: “There is also a lot of work to be done in both political and electoral reforms. I request former Vice President Atiku Abubakar to step into the shoes.”

    He pointed out the presidential election was marred irregularities but argued it was better not to approach the election tribunal.

    He said: “I can see how tempting it is to take the option of the Election Petition Tribunal. But that, in my view, is not the right decision.

    “We look forward to a new Nigeria, strong and united; a new Nigeria that will not vote on the basis of ethnic and primordial sentiments.”

    He lamented ethnicity played major role in the voting pattern, pointing out the APC and the PDP benefited from “primordial voting.”

    “The excepted zone is the South-West, where voting occurred on the basis of issues.

    “The significance and consequence of the 2019 presidential election are huge unless we are able to reverse it.

    “2023 will follow the pattern of 2019 unless we do something about it,” Agbakoba said.

  • Zamfara: Agbakoba questions AGF’s letter to INEC

    A former Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) president Dr Olisa Agbakoba (SAN) has urged Attorney-General of the Federation Abubakar Malami (SAN) to withdraw the letter asking the Independent National Electoral Commission  (INEC ) to postpone election in Zamfara State.

    The AGF asked INEC to postpone the election to enable the All Progressives Congress (APC) field candidates in the state.

    INEC barred APC from fielding contestants for failing to meet up with the deadline for submission of candidates.

    Agbakoba argued that if anyone was to make the postponement request, it should be the APC, not the AGF.

    He said: “I am shocked by your letter to INEC on the above subject. You are the Attorney-General of the Federation and not the Attorney-General of INEC.

    “INEC is an independent institution and cannot take directives from the Federal Government.

    “If there is need for the postponement of the Zamfara State election as indicated in your letter, the proper person to request the postponement is the APC.

    “In any case, Sections 38 and 39 of the Electoral Act 2010 which your request is based on have nothing to do with postponement of elections.

    “President Muhammadu Buhari has at various fora undertaken that the Federal Government will not interfere with INEC. Your letter puts that commitment to question. It is my hope that this letter will be immediately withdrawn.

  • Onnoghen: Agbakoba sues NJC, seeks declaratory reliefs

    A former president of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) Mr Olisa Agbakoba (SAN) has approached a Federal High Court in Lagos, challenging the suspension of Justice Walter Onnoghen as Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN).

    In the suit, Agbakoba joined the Attorney General of the Federation (AGF) and the National Judicial Council (NJC) as first and second defendants.

    His application is brought pursuant to Order 3 rule 9 of the Federal High Court Civil Procedure Rules 2009.

    The plaintiff wants the court to decide, whether by the combined interpretation of Section 153 (1)(i) and Section 292 (1) (a) (i) of the Constitution, Justice Onnoghen can be suspended from office without the recommendation of the NJC or the President acting on an address supported by two third majority of the Senate.

    Read Also: CJN’s suspension: Agbakoba, activist kick

    Agbakoba seeks from the court: “A Declaration that by the combined interpretation of the above Sections of the Constitution as (amended) Justice Onnoghen cannot be suspended or removed from office except on the recommendation of the NJC or the President acting on an address supported by two thirds majority of the Senate.”

    He also seeks further order or orders as the Court may deem fit to make in the circumstances.

    No date has been fixed for hearing of the suit.

    NAN

  • Onnoghen: Confusion over Agbakoba’s petition

    A petition written by a former president of Nigeria Bar Association (NBA) Olisa Agbakoba, SAN to the National Judicial Council against CCT chairman Danladi Umar is generating confusion.

    Agbakoba in his petition against the CCT chairman gave reasons why he should not preside over the trial of the CJN.

    Investigation revealed that the NJC has referred the petition to FJSC.

    A highly-placed source said: “Some issues have arisen over the petition sent to FJSC because the CCT chairman is not a judicial officer per se. He is not on the judiciary payroll and he reports to the presidency.

    “When sworn in, the CCT chairman only took the Oath of Allegiance and Oath of Office meant for public officers.  The Judicial Oath was not administered on him.

    “The CCT chairman does not collect judicial remunerations and allowances.

    “I think the framers of the constitution anticipated this kind of situation and they left CCT on its own without any influence either from the Executive or the Judiciary.

    “If the CCT chairman had been a judicial officer, he would not be in a position to try the CJN who will be his boss.

    “Also, if you look at the Judicial Oath in the Seventh Schedule to 1999 Constitution, only the CCT chairman was left out of the list of those who should take it.

    The Judicial Oath reads: “I, …… do solemnly swear/affirm that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to the Federal Republic of Nigeria; that as Chief Justice of Nigeria/Justice of the Supreme Court/President/Justice of the Court of Appeal/Chief Judge/Judge of the Federal High Court/Chief Judge/Judge of the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja/Chief Judge of …… State/Judge of the High Court of …… State/Grand Kadi/Kadi of the Sharia Court of Appeal of the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja/ Grand Kadi/Kadi of the Sharia Court of Appeal of …. State/President/Judge of the Customary Court of Appeal of the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja/President/Judge of the Customary Court of Appeal of ……… State. I will discharge my duties, and perform my functions honestly, to the best of my ability and faithfully in accordance with the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria and the law, that I will abide by the Code of Conduct contained in the Fifth Schedule to the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria; that I will not allow my personal interest to influence my official conduct or my official decisions; that I will preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.”?  But a Senior Advocate of Nigeria, who spoke in confidence, said the FJSC can exercise disciplinary control on the CCT chairman.

    Read also: No cause for alarm over FG’s borrowing plan, says Finance Minister

    The SAN said:  “I think the NJC was right in referring Agbakoba’s petition against Danladi Umar to the FJSC. The CCT chairman is no an island unto himself.

    “If you look at paragraph 13 part 1 of the Third Schedule to the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria,  FJSC is empowered to discipline the CCT chairman.

    The section says: “The Federal Judicial Service Commission has power to: (a).   Advise the National Judicial Council in nominating persons for appointments to the office of :

    • The Chief Justice of Nigeria,
    • A Justice of the Supreme Court,
    • The President of the Court of Appeal,

    A Justice of the Court of Appeal,

    The Chief Judge of the Federal High Court,

    A Judge of the Federal High Court,

    The President of the National Industrial Court;

    A judge of the National Industrial Court; and

    the Chairman and Members of the Code of Conduct Tribunal,

    b).    Recommend to the National Judicial Council the removal of any of the Judicial Officers mentioned in sub-paragraph (a) above

    c).     Appoint, dismiss and exercise disciplinary control over the Chief Registrars and Deputy Chief Registrars of the Supreme Court, the Court of Appeal, the Federal High Court, the National Industrial Court and all other members of the staff of the Judicial Service of the Federation not otherwise specified in this Constitution and of the Federal Judicial Service Commission.”

    As at press time, the FJSC was yet to serve the CCT chairman any copy of the petition by  Agbakoba.

    Another source said: “I think the FJSC is also weighing options on the petition and issues around the trial of the CJN  and the status of the CCT chairman.

    “If you look at the composition of the NJC, the CJN is the chairman. Both  Onnoghen and the Acting CJN,  Justice Ibrahim Tanko Muhammad who should preside over FJSC have been queried by the National Judicial Council(NJC).

    “Also, the Attorney-General of the Federation, Mr. Abubakar Malami(SAN), who is a member of the FJSC, is in charge of the OAGF prosecuting CJN Onnoghen.

    “The case at hand is jut interwoven. The more issues crop up, the more complex we dip into crisis in the Judiciary.”

    Paragraph 12, part 1 of the Third Schedule to the 1999 constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, as amended, stipulates the composition of Federal Judicial Service Commission as follows:

    The Federal Judicial Service Commission shall comprise the following members:

    1.The Chief Justice of Nigeria, who shall be the Chairman;

    1. The President of the Court of Appeal;
    2. The Attorney-General of the Federation;
    3. The Chief Judge of the Federal High Court;
    4. The President of the National Industrial Court;
    5. Two persons, each of whom has been qualified to practice as a Legal Practitioners in Nigeria for a period of not less than fifteen years, from a list of not less than four persons so qualified and recommended by the Nigerian Bar Association; and
    6. Two other persons, not being Legal Practitioners, who in the opinion of the President are of unquestionable integrity.
  • Remove acting CJN immediately – Agbakoba

    A former Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) President Dr Olisa Agbakoba (SAN) has urged the National Judicial Council (NJC) to immediately remove Acting Chief Justice Tanko Muhammad.

    He made the demand in a January 28 letter to the NJC entitled: Petition against Hon. Justice Tanko Mohammed JSC

    Agbakoba recalled that on January 25, President Mohammadu Buhari, pursuant to an ex-parte order of the Code of the Conduct Tribunal (CCT), suspended the Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN), Walter Onnoghnen, and swore in Justice Mohammed as the Acting CJN.

    He wrote: “The Constitution is clear about the procedure for suspending or removing the Chief Justice of Nigeria. The Chief Justice of Nigeria can only be removed on the recommendation of the NJC.”

    He referred to Section 153 (1), Paragraph 21 (a) of the 3rd Schedule and Section 292 (1) (a) (i) of the 1999 Constitution and the Supreme Court decision in Elelu-Habeeb v AGF (2012) 40 WRN 1.

    Agbakoba said Justice Muhammad is fully aware of the state of law, yet presented himself to be sworn in by the President.

    “Incidentally, Justice Tanko Muhammad was a member of the NJC panel that removed Justice Obisike Orji of the Abia State High Court for accepting to be sworn in as Chief Judge by the Governor of Abia State without the recommendation of the NJC.

    Read Also; Protest in Calabar over Onnoghen’s suspension

    “It is a matter of regret that Justice Tanko Muhammad who participated in this process will lend himself to this constitutional infraction,” the SAN said.

    He urged the NJC to remove Justice Muhammad based on the Abia precedent.

    “We pray the NJC determine this petition in line with the decision in Justice Obisike Orji by immediately removing Justice Tanko Muhammad as Justice of the Supreme Court on grounds of gross misconduct by allowing himself to be sworn in by the President of Nigeria, without the recommendation of the NJC,” Agbakoba said.

  • CJN’s suspension: Agbakoba, activist kick

    A former President of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) Dr Olisa Agbakoba (SAN), has described the suspension of the Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN), Justice Walter Onnoghen, as an attack on the constitution.

    Onnoghen who was charged before the Code of Conduct Tribunal (CCT) on Jan. 14, with offences bordering on non-declaration of assets, was suspended on Friday.

    Justice Mohammed Tanko has been sworn in as the Acting CJN.

    In a statement made available to newsmen in Lagos on Saturday, Agbakoba said that all actions ought to be stayed, pending the determination of several cases and appeals filed on the issue before various courts which ordered maintenance of status quo.

    He said that the suspension contravenes the ruling of CCT on the matter.

    “The CCT itself, adjourned proceedings in respect of Justice Onnoghen’s matter in order to determine if it has jurisdiction to try Justice Onnoghen; the suspension contravenes the ruling.

    “There are at least six pending cases in superior courts of Nigeria and one in the Court of Appeal.

    “All these cases ruled that Justice Onnoghen should remain in office pending when all cases against him are resolved.

    “In any case Section 292 of the 1999 Constitution sets out the procedure for removing or suspending the Chief Justice of Nigeria.

    “The power to suspend or remove the Chief Justice of Nigeria vests in the Senate side of the National Assembly,” he said.

    Agbakoba called for reversal  of the  suspension.

    Also, a rights campaigner, Chief Malcom Omirhobo, told NAN that the suspension violated constitutional provisions.

    Omirhobo said that the suspension of Onnoghen and appointment of Tanko as Acting CJN did not follow due process of law.

    “It is insulting to ignore the order of the Court of Appeal asking parties in the suit between the CCT and the CJN to maintain status quo.

    “As the law stands, Justice Mohammed Tanko was not recommended to the president by the Nigerian Judicial Council for appointment; therefore, such an appointment is unlawful.

    NAN

     

  • Buhari not fighting corruption efficiently, says Olawepo Hashim

    The presidential candidate of Peoples Trust (PT), Gbenga Olawepo- Hashim on Saturday criticized President Muhammadu Buhari’s fight against corruption.

    Olawepo-Hashim said his administration is not fight corruption to achieved positive result.

    Corruption, he said will be tackled effectively if the minimum wage is above N18 thousand.

    Olawepo-Hashim promised to pay N50 thousand minimum wage if elected.

    He spoke in Abuja at the party’s presidential campaign flag off.

    Olawepo-Hashim vowed that the party if voted into power will put an end to poverty and deal with issue of insecurity in the country.

    His words: “We are a party that is determined to build a better Nigeria. We want to put an end to poverty, and under development that has been the hallmark of the incumbent government. We will fight corruption in a way that it will be done scientifically. It will not just going to be a police action. You cannot fight corruption when majority of the people are hungry.

    Read Also: N-Power beneficiaries endorse Buhari

    “A people that pay its workers minimum wage below 18 thousand Naira cannot fight corruption efficiently. We will raise the minimum wage to N50 thousand at the first anniversary of our government. You can trust this party.

    “We will exchange instability for security. We are at the point where we will stop hatred and violence and be unity, where the lives of every Nigeria will count equally. By the time I am elected by the Grace of God, we will build a truly United Nigeria. Today 11 out of 19 states of northern Nigeria have been overrun by bandits from across the border and violent that is caused by agents of disunity and destruction.

    “The southern states of Nigeria have been over taken by kidnappers, robbers and all form of social vices and this affects the economy of the country. Now we have more youths that are unemployed than those that are employed. Our resolve is to build a new economy that will guaranty job for our youths. We will restructure the way power is organize between the state and the Federal Government.

    “We will empower the states to have their own police side by side with the federal police so that the internal security can be enhanced.”

    The national chairman of the party, Dr. Olisa Agbakoba SAN, urged Nigerian especially party faithful to voted massively in the forthcoming presidential and other elections for a new, United Nigeria.

    He vowed to make everything positively possible to ensure that the party is victorious.

    The party’s flag was also presented to candidates contesting for various political positions who came from across the country for the event.