Tag: Olisa Metuh

  • Metuh attends court on stretcher

    Metuh attends court on stretcher

    *Judge postpones trial to March 14

    Olisa Metuh was brought to court today on a stretcher in compliance with an order of a Federal High Court, Abuja that he must attend court or have his bail revoked.

    Justice Okon Abang in a ruling on January 25, rejected a medical report tendered by Lawyers of the Former spokesman of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), claiming he was on admission in an hospital.

    Instead, the judge ordered Metuh to attend court today or have the bail earlier granted him revoked.

    In compliance with that order, his lawyer ensured he was brought to court early today in a white ambulance, belonging to the National Hospital, Abuja.

    Read Also: Attend court Feb. 5 or be returned to prison, judge tells Metuh

    He was later taken into the courtroom on  a stretcher, with the assistance of some medical personnel, friends and relations.

    He was covered with a white cloth, with an opening only in his head area, possibly to allow him breathe. He had bandage on his legs and neck area.

    Metuh and his company, Destra Investment Limited are being tried on allegations of corruption and money laundering.

    When proceedings opened, Metuh’s lawyer, Onyechi Ikpeazu (SAN) told the court that his client was in court in obedience to the court’s order, but was not in a good state to stand trial.

    He sought a month’s adjournment within which Metuh would have been fit enough to stand trial.

    Lawyer to Destra, Tochukwu Onwugbufor (SAN) agreed with Ikpeazu’s position.

    Prosecution lawyer, Sylvanus Tahir did not object to an adjournment, following which Justice Tsoho adjourned to March 14 for possible continuation for trail.

    At the conclusion of proceedings around 10.15am, Metuh was again moved out of the courtroom, still on the stretcher, into the ambulance stationed close to the court’s main entrance.

     

  • Attend court Feb. 5 or be returned to prison, judge tells Metuh

    Attend court Feb. 5 or be returned to prison, judge tells Metuh

    Justice Okon Abang of the Federal High Court in Abuja has ordered a former spokesman of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) Olisa Metuh, to attend court on February 5 or be arrested and returned to prison.

    Justice Abang gave the order yesterday whiling on two applications. One by Metuh’s lawyer, Okezie Ikpeazu (SAN), for adjournment on health ground and the other by prosecution lawyern Sylvanus Tahir, seeking the revocation of Metuh’s bail for allegedly being absent in court for not cogent reasons.

    The judge said Metuh had been absent from his trial since Monday without any lawful excuse. This, the judge said, was a sufficient reason to revoke the defendant’s bail.

    Metuh and his company, Dextra Investment Limited are being tried on money laundering charges before the court.

    Last Monday, Metuh was absent in court and his lawyer said he was on admission at the Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital, Nnewi, Anambra State. He drew the court’s attention to a letter to thate effecr from the hospital.

    On Tuesday, Ikpeazu applied for an adjournment of the case to a period outside this week based on the health situation of his client, an application Tahir objected to.

    Tahir described the letter from the Nnamdi Azikiwe Teaching Hospital, relied on by Ikpeazu as worthless.

    He urged the court to revoke  Metuh’s bail and return him to prison, from where he should be made to attend his trial.

    Justice Abang, in his ruling, noted that  the medical report  relied on by Metuh to stay away from court was fraudulently smuggled into the court’s file and aimed at forcing the court to stay proceedings in the trial indefinitely.

    He agreed with Tahir to the effect the hospital’s letter dated January 21, 2018 indicating that Metuh had been on admission since the previous day, for treatment for an ailment, was sent to the court to frustrate the trial.

    He queried why the medical report had to be issued barely 24 hours to the resumption of the trial on January 22.

    The judge also queried how the letter issued in Nnewi, Anambra State, could find its way to the court’s file in Abuja within 24 hours.

    He said the letter was fraudulently smuggled into the court’s file and defence lawyers chose to rely on it to ask for an adjournment yet refused to disclose the identity of the person who sent the document to the court.

    Ikpeazu and lawyer to Destra, Tochukwu Onwugbufor (SAN), thanked the judge for showing sympathy to Metuh.

    They promised not to stall the trial, and noted that the judge has always given the case accelerated hearing before the January 12, 2018 judgment of the Supreme Court, which directed that the case be promptly decided.

  • Attend court Feb. 5 or be returned to prison, judge tells Metuh

    Attend court Feb. 5 or be returned to prison, judge tells Metuh

    Justice Okon Abang of the Federal High Court in Abuja has ordered a former spokesman of the Peoples Democratic Party ( PDP ) Olisa Metuh, to attend court on February 5 or be arrested and returned to prison.

    Justice Abang gave the order yesterday whiling on two applications. One by Metuh’s lawyer, Okezie Ikpeazu (SAN), for adjournment on health ground and the other by prosecution lawyern Sylvanus Tahir, seeking the revocation of Metuh’s bail for allegedly being absent in court for not cogent reasons.

    The judge said Metuh had been absent from his trial since Monday without any lawful excuse. This, the judge said, was a sufficient reason to revoke the defendant’s bail.

    Metuh and his company, Dextra Investment Limited are being tried on money laundering charges before the court.

    Last Monday, Metuh was absent in court and his lawyer said he was on admission at the Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital, Nnewi, Anambra State. He drew the court’s attention to a letter to thate effecr from the hospital.

    On Tuesday, Ikpeazu applied for an adjournment of the case to a period outside this week based on the health situation of his client, an application Tahir objected to.

    Tahir described the letter from the Nnamdi Azikiwe Teaching Hospital, relied on by Ikpeazu as worthless. 

    He urged the court to revoke  Metuh’s bail and return him to prison, from where he should be made to attend his trial.

    Justice Abang, in his ruling, noted that  the medical report  relied on by Metuh to stay away from court was fraudulently smuggled into the court’s file and aimed at forcing the court to stay proceedings in the trial indefinitely.

    The judge said EFCC’s application for the revocation of Metuh’s bail deserved to be granted, but that the court decided to suspend taking such step in order to afford the defendant another opportunity “to turn over a new leaf”.

    He agreed with Tahir to the effect the hospital’s letter dated January 21, 2018 indicating that Metuh had been on admission since the previous day, for treatment for an ailment, was sent to the court to frustrate the trial.

    He queried why the medical report had to be issued barely 24 hours to the resumption of the trial on January 22.

    The judge also queried how the letter issued in Nnewi, Anambra State, could find its way to the court’s file in Abuja within 24 hours. 

    He said the letter was fraudulently smuggled into the court’s file and defence lawyers chose to rely on it to ask for an adjournment yet refused to disclose the identity of the person who sent the document to the court.

    He noted that the “lengthy letter” by the hospital laced with many medical terms, was meant to confuse the court.

    “How will the court, not being an expert in the medical field, be able to understand it, if not to confuse the court and give the impression that the ailment is serious?” the judge asked.

    He ruled that the letter having not been filed before the court through established procedure and without any indication on it linking it to the trial, the EFCC’s lawyer was right to describe it as “a trash meant for the dustbin”.

    The judge noted that the letter failed to state the period that the defendant must be on bed restam He said it could be implied that the court had to adjourn the case indefinitely. 

    He said the application was like an application for stay of proceedings, which had been prohibited in criminal trials by the Supreme Court.

    He said: “That means the court will be forced to adjourned sine die (indefinitely). It is my humble view that this sounds like an application for stay of proceedings. It is not just a medical report but an application for stay of proceedings.”

    He recalled that the Supreme Court had in its judgment delivered on June 9, 2017, on an appeal by Metuh prohibited stay of proceedings in a criminal trial.

    The judge also recalled that the Supreme Court, delivering judgment in an appeal by Metuh’s firm and co-defendant, Destra Investments Limited, on January 12, 2018, had ordered the Federal Court to give the case an accelerated hearing.

    He said:  “Any purported medical report that will act as a stay of proceedings ought to be rejected by the court. The medical report was fraudulently smuggled into the court’s file.

    “I agree with the learned counsel for the prosecution that it a trash meant for the dustbin. It is a useless paper only dumped on the court.”

    He however said out of human sympathy he would consider the plea by defence lawyers  by adjourning the case till February 5.

    The judge said, “‎In view of the passionate plea by the learned senior counsel for the first and second defendants, I hereby suspend my decision to revoke the bail granted to the first defendant. I hereby give him another chance to turn over a new leaf.

    “Where the situation remains the same at the next adjourned date, this court shall exercise its power of revoking the bail. This matter is adjourned till February 5 and 6 for continuation of trial.”

    The judge further said that Metuh’s application for adjournment as argued on Tuesday and Wednesday had been overtaken by events since by his (Metuh’s) conduct, the court had been unable to record progress in the case since Monday.

    The judge granted the application by Metuh,  to call additional 10 witnesses.

    He noted that Metuh had engaged in different ploys to frustrate the trial and attempts, “to hijack the proceedings.

    “The first defendant has overstretched the patience of the court beyond limit in these proceedings,” Justice Abang said..

    He said the court would no longer accept any medical report from Metuh.

    The judge also ruled that the court would no longer entertain any application for adjournment to enable the defendant to call any witness.

    He therefore directed that all the remaining witnesses Metuh had to call must always be in court for all proceedings.

    Ikpeazu and lawyer to Destra, Tochukwu Onwugbufor (SAN), thanked the judge for showing sympathy to Metuh.

    They promised not to stall the trial, and noted that the judge has always given the case accelerated hearing before the January 12, 2018 judgment of the Supreme Court, which directed that the case be promptly decided.

  • Prosecution urges court to revoke Metuh’s bail

    Prosecution urges court to revoke Metuh’s bail

    The prosecution in the trial of ex-spokesman of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Olisa Metuh, has applied for the revocation of the bail earlier grated him by a Federal High Court in Abuja.

    Lead prosecution lawyer, Sylvanus Tahir, who made the application on Tuesday, asked the court to return Metuh to prison pending the conclusion of his trial.

    Tahir said his application was informed by the ex-PDP spokesman’s absence from the court on two consecutive days, including Tuesday, a development, the prosecution said was a violation of the bail conditions.

    Metuh is standing trial alongside his firm, Destra Investment Limited, for allegedly receiving N400million unlawfully from the Office of the National Security Adviser (NSA) in 2014. They are also engaged in money laundering to the tune of $2million.

    Metuh, who is currently conducting his defence, was absent in court on Monday, with his lawyer, Onyechi Ikpeazu informing the court that he was on admission in hospital.

    Ikpeazu also tendered a letter, indicating that Metuh was on admission at the Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital in Nnewi, Anambra State.

    The letter dated January 21, 2018 showed that his client had been on admission since January 20, 2017.

    The court adjourned till Tuesday to enable Metuh’s lawyer brief the court about his client’s health condition.

    The ex-PDP spokesman was again absent in court on Tuesday, prompting Tahir to apply for revocation of bail granted him.

     

  • Metuh hospitalised in Nnewi, may be referred to UNTH Enugu – Lawyer

    Metuh hospitalised in Nnewi, may be referred to UNTH Enugu – Lawyer

    The trial of former spokesman of the Peoples Democratic Party ( PDP ), Olisa Metuh and his company, Destra Investment Limited on charges of money laundering was stalled yesterday owning to Metuh’s absence in court.

    Metuh and Destra are being tried before the Federal High Court in Abuja for allegedly receiving N400m unlawfully from the Office of the National Security Adviser (NSA) in 2014. They are said to have also engaged in money laundering to the tune of $2m.

    At the scheduled resumption of the trial yesterday, Metuh’s lawyer, Onyechi Ikpeazu (SAN), told the court that his client was absent because he was on admission at the Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital in Nnewi, Anambra State.

    Ikpeazu noted that the hospital has written a letter dated January 21, 2018 indicating that his client had been on admission since January 20, 2017.

    He read some portions of the letter from the hospital, where it stated that “we are managing him” and that it “may refer him to the University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital ( UNTH ), Enugu” for further treatment.

    Ikpeazu said he knew that the Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital in Nnewi hospital “is not as equipped as UNTH Enugu.”

    In reaction to the reference to a recent Supreme Court judgment on the case by the prosecution lawyer, Sylvanus Tahir, Ikpeazu said the trial judge, Justice Okon Abang has always given the case prompt hearing.

    He said the claim about Metuh’s ill health was not orchestrated by the defence to frustrate the trial.

    Ikpeazu applied for an adjournment to a later date to enable the defence report to the court on his client’s health situation.

    In further reaction to Tahir’ observation that the Supreme Court had, in its January 12, 2018 judgment in the appeal by Destra, order accelerated hearing, the company’s lawyer, Tochukwu Onwugbufor (SAN), said the Supreme Court’s directive for a speedy trial would not have a remarkable impact on the trial.

    Onwugbufor said, “Everybody who has participated in this case knows that your lordship has never tolerated any delay.

    “From my experience, the court has been very expeditious in the handling of this case and matters before it. Even the motion that went to the Supreme Court was determined by your lordship and it never constituted any delay to the hearing of this case.”

    Responding, Tahir said Metuh’s absence would hamper further progress in the trial. He said he would not oppose the defence’s request for adjournment because it was based on health ground.

    Tahir noted that the development would defeat the intention of the Supreme Court in its January 12 judgment. He said, “The apex court was clear and very emphatic on the need to bring the case to a conclusion.

    “The Supreme Court made an order directing this court to treat this case with dispatch. And here we are confronted with the situation that will seemingly defeat the order made by the Supreme Court,” Tahir said.

    In his ruling, Justice Abang observed that the trial was scheduled to resume yesterday for the prosecution to cross-examination Metuh’s 9th witness, Adebayo Bodurin.

    The judge agreed to adjourn to the next day (today) since the prosecution did not oppose the defence’s request for adjournment to enable it brief the court on Metuh’s health status.

  • Dasuki says he can’t recall his dealings with Metuh

    Dasuki says he can’t recall his dealings with Metuh

    Former National Security Adviser (NSA), Mohammed Dasuki told a Federal High Court in Abuja on Friday that he could not recall his dealings with ex-spokesman of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Olisa Metuh while in office.
    Dasuki, who admitted knowing Metuh as the National Publicity Secretary of the PDP, also said he could not recall off hand whether or not N400m was paid to Metuh through his company, Destra Investment.
    The ex-NSA also said he could not confirm, without access to his personal records, the nature of the relationship that existed between his office, Metuh and Destra.
    Dasuki spoke in Abuja  while testifying as the 8th witness of the 1st defendant in t on-going trial of Metuh and his Destra Investment.
    Metuh is being tried with  Destra on a seven-count charge of money laundering involving alleged cash transaction of $2 million and unlawful receipt of N400m from the office of the NSA.
    Led in evidence by Metuh’s lawyer, Onyechi Ikpeazu (SAN), Dasuki was asked if he knew what it meant to say ‘due process was followed as contained in the document reflecting the payment of N400m to the defendants, he said he understood the statement to imply that all laid down procedures were complied with.
    Dasuki said he has never been charged or convicted in relation to hi activities while in office,  except in the court of public opinion.
     “I say No. I have not been charged or convicted of any unlawful act with respect to the 1st defendant”.
    On who who took directives from, he said as the NSA, he was answerable to he President, who by then was Goodluck Jonathan.
    Under cross-examination by the prosecution lawyer, Sylvanus Tahir, Dasuki still insisted he needed to consult his records before he could recall details of his relationship with the defendants.
    When asked to recall some duties of his office as the NSA, and whether the office was meant for only people with military background, he said “Maybe you can ask the President, who appointed me what he was looking for in an NSA when he appointed me.”
    “I will leave you with your understanding that the office of the NSA is meant for only people with military training or background.
    “However, so far, I believe Dr. Bukar Shuaibu and Prof. Galadanji where the only people that did not have military or security background, who have occupied the office of the NSA.”
    When asked to provide the job description of the NSA, he said: “It has responsibility as regards issues of security, but for the details I will refer you to the National Security Agencies Act.
    “The NSA to the best of my knowledge is a public officer.”
    Dasuki said he did not know if the office of th NSA haS any affiliation with any political party.
    On whether he met Metuh while in office, Dasuki said: “I know Chief Olisa Metuh as a person. I know he was the Publicity Secretary of the PDP which was the party in government that I served proudly.”
    “I don’t personally know the 2nd defendant, but as to whether I knew it officially, I have to make reference to my record.
    “I am not aware of the relationship or transaction that existed between the defendants and the ONSA. Not without, record, I cannot remember.”
    At a point Tahir asked that Dasuki be given when confronted with a document earlier tendered in court, marked exhibit B, to which an e-payment mandate for N400m allegedly paid to Metuh through his company’s Diamond Bank Plc account was attached.
    The payment mandate said  to have been authorised on November 24, 2014, was alleged to be payment for security services.
    When asked to confirm the document, Dasuki said  the document emanated from the prosecution, who he claimed was “desperate to get a conviction”.
    “That is why I insist on getting and referring to my own records. This is not the original document, it is a photocopy.”
    Tahir later asked Dasuki to tell th court the services rendered by the defendant to warrant the payment of N400m to them. Dasuki said: “I have nothing to say. If you want an answer, then I should have access to my records.
    “It will be useful for the counsel to get himself acquainted with the National Security Agencies Act.”
  • Court declines to suspend Metuh’s trial

    Court declines to suspend Metuh’s trial

    A Federal High Court in Abuja on Friday declined request to delay the trial of ex-spokesman of the Peoples Democratic Party, Chief Olisa Metuh, to enable detained former National Security Adviser (NSA), Mohammed  Dasuki to consult his records.
    Dasuki who was summoned to testify as Metuh’s witness, had on Wednesday said he needed time to consult his records to be able to recall his dealing with Metuh and his company, Destra Investment, while in office.
    Based on Dasuki’s position, lawysers to Metuh and his company – Emeka Etiaba and Tockukwu Nwugbufor (both Senior Advocates of Nigeria) sought adjournment in the case to enable Dasuki consult his records, a request prosecution lawyer, Sylvanus Tahir objected to.
    In a ruling on Friday morning, the trial judge, Justice Okon Abang said he could not adjourn the trial for Dasuki to consult his personal documents that are not in evidence before the court.
    The judge said it was for Metuh’s lawyer to use his professional skill to ask Dasuki relevant questions that will elicit answers favourable to the case of his client.
    Justice Abang said he had watched Dasuki’s demeanour in the witness box, saying he appeared “composed and relaxed”.
    He said Etiaba (Metuh’s lawyer)  was at liberty to ask the witness questions based on the proof evidence already before the court, stressing that Dasuki’s answers would constitute his evidence in the trial.
    The judge  said Dasuki could elect not to answer questions posed to him as he would be cross-examined by the prosecution based on his testimony with respect to the charge against the defendants.
    He added: “This application for adjournment lacks merit, same is accordingly refused.”
    The judge consequently directed Dasuki to resume his testimony.
  • Court rejects Jonathan’s request for N1b from Metuh

    Court rejects Jonathan’s request for N1b from Metuh

    A Federal High Court in Abuja has rejected an application by former President Goodluck Jonathan seeking to be paid N1billion before he could attend court to testify in favour of ex-spokesman of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Olisa Metuh.

    Medtuh, who is being tried with his company, Destra Investment Ltd for money laundering offences and allegedly receiving N400million unlawfully from the office of the National Security Adviser (NSA).

    In his defence, Metuh, who has consistently claimed that the N400 was paid to him by Jonathan in 2014 for an image laundering project for his (Jonathan’s) government, applied for Jonathan and former NSA to be called as his witnesses.

    Upon learning that a witness summons has been issued against him, Jonathan filed the application, seeking the voiding of the summons on him or that Metuh is asked to pay N1b to facilitate his attendance of court.

    But in a ruling some moments ago, Justice struck out the application by Jonathan on the grounds that it was based on hearsay.

    The judge said his court lacked the jurisdiction to hear the application or make an order in Jonathan’s favour because there is evidence that he has not been served with the subpoena (witness summons) issued against him.

    Justice Abang held that Jonathan cannot base his application on media reports when he has not been served.

    The judge also dismissed a motion by Dasuki, seeking to adjourn the proceedings pending the determination of his appeal.

    Details later…

  • Metuh: DSS produces Dasuki in court

    Metuh: DSS produces Dasuki in court

    The Department of State Services (DSS) on Wednesday produced the detained former National Security Adviser, Sambo Dasuki, in compliance with an order of the Federal High Court he should appear as a witness.

    He is expected to be a witness in the trial of a former Publicity Secretary of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Mr Olisa Metuh.
    Dasuki was decked in a light blue attire with a cap to match.
    On Tuesday, despite the request by defence lawyers for an order of arrest to be issued against the Director-General of the DSS, Lawal Daura, for failing to produce the ex-NSA in court, the trial judge, Justice Okon Abang ruled that he could not yet conclude that the DSS top man deliberately flouted the court order.
    But the counsel prosecuting Metuh and his company, Destra Investments Limited on behalf of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, Mr. Sylvanus Tahir, had informed the court on Tuesday that the Legal Adviser of DSS informed him over the telephone that Dasuki refused to be brought to court except by force.
    Tahir later told the judge that he received a text message from the Legal Adviser of DSS saying after much persuasion, Dasuki agreed to appear in court on Tuesday.
    But the judge had ruled on Tuesday that whether or not Dasuki and another subpoenaed witness, former President Goodluck Jonathan, would go ahead to testify would depend on the outcome of the court’s rulings on the summoned witnesses’ application objecting to Metuh’s request for them to testify in the case.
  • My request for Jonathan as witness not to humiliate him – Metuh

    My request for Jonathan as witness not to humiliate him – Metuh

    Former spokesman of the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) has said his request that ex-President Goodluck Jonathan be compelled to testify as defence witness in his trial was not intended to humiliate Jonathan.

    Metuh said his choice of Jonathan as a witness, was for the ex-President to corroborate his argument that he was innocent of all allegations against him in the charges on which he was being tried.

    He denied allegation by a group – Save Ijaw Nation Group – that the subpoena issued on Jonathan was part of a plot to let him (Metuh) off the hook.

    Metuh, in a statement issued Thursday, said he has no reason to connive with anyone to embarrass Jonathan or seek to be let of the hook, because he was not in any hook, and was innocent of all allegations against him.

    The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) is prosecuting Metuh and his company, Destra Investments Limited, before the Federal High Court, Abuja, on a seven-count charge of money laundering involving alleged cash transaction of $2m and fraudulent receipt of N400m meant for procurement of arms from the Office of the NSA.

    The EFCC alleged that Metuh and his firm used the N400m for PDP’s campaign activities during the 2015 presidential election.

    N400m was alleged to be “part of the proceeds of an unlawful activities” of former National Security Adviser (NSA), Mohammed Dasuki.

    But, Metuh has consistently denied knowing that the N400m was paid into his account from the office of the NSA. He has insisted that the N400m‎ was paid to his company’s account by Jonathan for a public relations campaign for his (Jonathan’s) government.

    Metuh, who is currently conducting his defence in the case, applied to the court to issue supoena on Jonathan and Dasuki to compel them to testify as his witnesses in the trial.

    The ex-PDP spokesman said his lawyer had written the duo, who allegedly failed to respond to their letters, a development that informed his decision to apply for the issuance of subpoena on the two.

    Based on Metuh’s request, the trial judge, Justice Okon Abang signed the witness summons issued on Jonathan and Dasuki.

    Both men were absent in court on Wednesday. The court found out that Jonathan has not been served with the subpoena and that although, Dasuki was served, the Department of State Services (DSS) failed to produce him in court.

    While adjourning the case on October 25, Justice Abang gave the court’s bailiff five days to efffect personal service on Jonathan, failing which he should be served through substituted means.

    On Dasuki, the judge ordered the EFCC to explore administrative means, to ensure that DSS produce Dasuki on the next date of October 31.

    In his statement issued yesterday, Metuh said: “My attention has been drawn to a release by the Save Ijaw Nation Group wherein they alleged that the order given by the court in my trial was negotiated by me as a means of letting me ‘off the hook.’

    “They also stated that I surrendered myself to be used to drag down former President Goodluck Jonathan and impugn on his character and person.

    “In the light of this and in deference to the former President, I have elected to make these clarifications personally.

    “First of all, I state unequivocally that I am completely innocent of the charge against me and therefore have no reason to negotiate with anybody to let me off a non-existent hook.

    “It is therefore inconceivable and completely ridiculous for anybody to think that I would for any reason betray or surrender myself to be used against President Goodluck Jonathan, for whom I have immense respect and served diligently, without any apologies, in and out of office.

    “To what end will I conspire with the same set of people, who singled me out to be humiliated and openly handcuffed, while spreading all manner of malicious stories against me, most of which they even denied outright in court while others remain completely unsubstantiated?

    “Ordinarily, the content of the charge against me in the Federal High Court should not breed any worries but for the fact that it now appears that the anti-corruption fight has shifted the burden of proof to a defendant once an allegation is made.

    “On the issue of conniving with the government against former President Goodluck Jonathan, the Save Ijaw Nation Group may be alarmed by successive media reports that he was ordered to be served on Tuesday with an instruction to appear the following day and subsequently given a five-day time limit; setting off a media frenzy as if the former president is needed for reasons more than a mere request by my lawyers for a corroborative evidence in my case.

    “I totally concede that this is not deserving of the status, person and image of the former President especially with his contribution and sacrifices to national development and sustenance of democracy in our dear country.

    “Without prejudice to all the foregoing, I accept that it was the need for corroboration of lack of mens rea on my part that led my lawyers to request for the evidence of the respected former President to assist them in proving my innocence.

    “However, with all the controversies arising from the reports of the said pronouncements and the attendant concerns thereof, I have instructed my legal team to revisit and review the entire issue of the subpoena.

    “In the past 20 months I have shouldered my travails personally and without seeking to involve any other individual and/or groups in this unfortunate saga.

    “I habour no ill feeling or malice towards none as I believe that with time, justice will surely be done in my matter,” Metuh said.