Tag: Olusegun Obasanjo

  • Obasanjo launches Azikel Refinery today

    Obasanjo launches Azikel Refinery today

    Former President Olusegun Obasanjo will today lay the  foundation stone of Azikel Refinery in Yenagoa, Bayelsa State.

    The privately-owned refinery which got its licence in 2015 soon after President Muhammadu Buhari’s inauguration is due to take off next year.

    Dr. Azibapu Eruani, President of the Azikel Group promoters of the project said the refinery on completion, would go a long way in reducing persistent scarcity of refined products such as  petrol,  aviation fuel, kerosene and diesel.

    He said his belief in the role of the private sector in boosting the nation’s economic growth informed his decision to embark on the venture which is projected to create hundreds of jobs in and outside the Niger Delta region.

    The refinery is situated on a  19.9 hectares of virgin swamp forest which had to be sand filled  in preparation for physical construction of structures.

    Spokesman of Azikel Group, Mr. Austin Ebipade,said Phase 1 of the project is 65% completed.

    This comprises the Outside Battery Limit (OSBL) and the Inside Battery

    Limit (ISBL)

    Prominent Nigerians including foreign investors are already in Yenagoa for the foundation laying  which is slated to start at 11 am.

  • Obasanjo inaugurates Bayelsa Diagnostic Centre

    Obasanjo inaugurates Bayelsa Diagnostic Centre

    Former President, Chief Olusegun Obasanjo, on Friday, commended Gov. Seriake Dickson of Bayelsa for embarking on projects that would improve the overall development of the state and the people.

    Obasanjo gave the commendation while inaugurating newly built Bayelsa Diagnostic Centre.

    He said the centre was built according to international standard and would assist in improving health care delivery to the people.

    He added that “20 years ago when I came to Bayelsa for campaign, there was no space to gather people, but today, there is great difference.

    “Yes, for full development to take place in Bayelsa, there must be accessibility in terms of transportation, communication and health care delivery.

    “I must tell you, for six hours I am here, I have seen something to convince me that Bayelsa is already in transformation stage.

    “The health facility here is second to none.”

    Earlier, Gov. Dickson said the diagnostic centre was part of his promises to the people of Bayelsa.

    Dickson reiterated his administration’s readiness to continue to work to uplift the healthcare delivery in the state.

    He said the uncompleted 500-bed hospital initiated by previous administration would be given a face lift in the next fiscal year.

    “We will complete the project before the end of my tenure,’’ he assured.

    The Commissioner for Health, Prof. Ebitimitulah Etebu, said the centre was capable of taking care of the diagnostic needs of people in the state.

    He added that “the diagnostic centre would handle screening of blood, radiology and the result transmitted electronically to international partners in America.”

    NAN

  • 2019: Governors shun Obasanjo’s coalition

    2019: Governors shun Obasanjo’s coalition

    Governors are yet to identify with the Coalition for Nigeria Movement (CNM) – former President Olusegun Obasanjo’s antidote to Nigeria’s leadership quandary.

    CNM had claimed that 13 of the 36 governors would embrace it.

    But with the exception of a southern governor whose commitment is “fluid”, no governor has joined the movement, The Nation learnt.

    The development is said to be troubling some of the coordinators of the organization, which Obasanjo hopes could transmit into a party.

    According to sources, the seeming stability in the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and the prospect of a sustainable reconciliation in the All Progressives Congress (APC) have made some of the governors to have a rethink on CNM.

    It was also learnt that time constraint accounted for the avoidance of the coalition by the governors and most members of the National Assembly.

    The governors are said to prefer fighting for survival in their parties than taking a gamble.

    Although the CNM is banking on a likely implosion in APC, the permutations are said to be “not working” right following the consolidation of the party’s strength in the Southwest especially in Lagos, Ogun, Oyo, Ondo, Ekiti, and Osun states.

    A PDP governor, who spoke in confidence with our correspondent, said: “We believe there is no basis for going to a new movement when we have a virile party. Most of our governors,who are eligible for second term, may get automatic ticket. So, what is the basis for teaming up with CNM.

    “Nobody wants to leave a known party for the unknown and risk his political career. CNM cannot fly in spite the fact that its ultimate target is to turn into a political party.

    “Their target is to produce a party, which will be a hybrid of PDP, APC and lesser parties.

    “In fact, technically, if you look at their plan, there is no time for any effective movement against APC other than adopting PDP which the CNM does not want.

    “Obasanjo’s coalition is already tackling APC on socio-economic problems facing the nation. PDP is ready to benefit from the consequences of their Cold War.”

    The source added: “I think there is a PDP governor whose position is fluid on CNM but we are watching him. We may end up expelling him from the party.”

    A source in APC said: “We are preoccupied with reconciliation and consolidation of our strength in many states. We have heard rumours of some governors defecting to CNM and PDP, but none of them has signed up for Obasanjo’s coalition.

    “There is no doubt that some of our leaders, governors and lawmakers are unhappy; we will try to reconcile our differences because allowing irreconcilable division will affect all of us.

    It was learnt that ex-President Goodluck Jonathan might not join forces with Obasanjo in CNM.

    He reportedly told his associates that he preferred to remain in PDP.

    A source close to the ex-President said: “His Excellency, Dr. Jonathan, told us that he believes in the leadership of Obasanjo and he respects  him a lot but he won’t join any movement outside PDP.

    “So far, this is where we are at present. We are focusing on how to strengthen the PDP, which has a good chance of returning to power in 2019.

    “We are working on our vision bordering on the reconstruction of Nigeria for better.”

    Our correspondent spoke to CNM spokesman Akin Osuntokun at about 7:53pm. He promised to return the call but he never did until this paper went to bed.

  • Of OBJ, IBB and Father Hassan Kukah

    Of OBJ, IBB and Father Hassan Kukah

    Generals Olusegun Obasanjo, Ibrahim Badamasi Babangida and Bishop Hassan Kukah have, in their various ways, written themselves into Nigerian history, if not yet folklore, and they will always be celebrated for one thing or the other. This, in essence, means that mentioning their names have become an imperative wherever, and whenever, Nigeria is mentioned. This fact does not, however, suggest that there can be no glitches in that rendition as there sure are: the aborted Third Term Project, which General Obasanjo has, like forever, denied (‘If I wanted it, I would have told my God and He would have granted it’, or words to that effect), in spite of many beneficiaries of the accompanying bribe not only confessing but displaying millions of naira in public; General Babangida’s annulment of the freest, ever, election in Nigeria – that of Jun 12 1983, in which Nigerians unanimously voted billionaire businessman, M.K O Abiola of blessed memory, and for Bishop Kukah, his recent, totally incongruous invitation to the military to again intervene in the affairs of Nigeria. Just as these men are celebrated, history must, uncannily, record these glitches so that they are shown to be human, after all, and liable to commit their own mistakes like you and I, ordinary mortals. Let us therefore, proceed apace, to document these individuals as they occurred in our recent history beginning from the Bishop who, because we must quickly dispatch this section of our story, I go no further than pressing into service, The Nation’s newspaper HARDBALL column of Thursday, 8 February, 2018 which wrote, inter alia, as follows, but edited for space, in what it captioned as Kukah Cooking Full Emptiness: “The revered Father Matthew Hassan Kukah, Catholic Bishop of Sokoto, just cooked his latest broth. But it is nothing but full emptiness — taken from the angle of the good priest as sound public thinker, with a deep knowledge of Nigerian contemporary history and who loves to impress with great polemics — a little to the left; and a little to the right, like Ibrahim Babangida’s doomed two parties. Has reason so spectacularly failed among Nigeria’s most rigorous thinkers, Hardball wrote further, that their forensic minds must throw up past debacles and future miracles? Father Kukah let it slip, rippling with avant-garde knowledge and holy wisdom, that Nigerians could not afford to, much longer, “take the military for granted”. Pray, who are the military and what might that mean? Are the military a political party, constitutionally free to join political frays? Or, on the philosophical plain: the military, all-wise and supremely above board, should come, post-haste, and sack the democratic order yet again? This, proceeded the column, is a most condemnable baiting — if not outright goading — by a man who definitely ought to know better. It is a sickly reminiscence of that sorry period of Nigerian life, when some otherwise respected “intellectuals” would hug to crass emotions, and with sententious zest, beckon the military to come roll in their tanks.

    No surprises though.

    When Buhari’s anti-corruption war debuted in 2015, Father Kukah did not quite ripple with priestly zeal, to clear Nigeria’s public finance of sleaze. Rather, he called on Nigerians to “move on” because President Goodluck Jonathan had done fantastically well for losing election and quitting. Was he supposed to stay put, holy Father? Now, he is suggesting the military, which by the Constitution, are subordinate to the democratic order, as having intervening rights. That is bordering on high treason, no matter how putative. That is why the Catholic Church must call this priest to order. He sure has rights as a citizen. But his right ends when he starts insinuating extra-constitutional ideas, just because there is tension in the land”

    Such love of country, and grandstanding! Need I add a word more?

    Since General Obasanjo made his Special Statement and launched his movement, I have read nobody contests his right to talk from now till kingdom come. All they have said is that there are ways to talk, especially when you’re not only a highly regarded statesman, two-time president of Nigeria who has, with considerable justification, been described by none other than a colleague columnist of mine on The Nation on Sunday, as the greatest pilgrim to the Villa since Buhari’s fresh coming. It has been further contended that, by launching his movement to take over from Buhari, who he says must return to Daura, as if we have all forgotten his own, still denied, third term ambition, Obasanjo was opportunistically deploying the coup tactics of raking up all the hardship in the polity, using them for purposes of hoisting a MUGABE SPIRIT, of forever wanting to be in power, even if, from the shadows. Or who of his recruits into the movement, would boss the general? His launch, and all the supporting appurtenances, they say, uncannily reminded them of the murderous, goggled infantry general justifying their December 31, 1983 coup, and claiming that Nigerian hospitals have become no better than consulting clinics.

    But, they say, you cannot deceive all the people, all the time. Commenting on this recently Dr Jide Oluwajuyitan  wrote:”But with Col Ali (rtd), former PDP chairman and under whose chairmanship of PPRA, house probe confirmed the theft of N1.6 trillion by PDP stalwarts and their siblings under the fuel subsidy scam, and Olagunsoye Oyinlola who as governor of Osun State was sacked by the courts for electoral fraud, as the movement’s chief drivers, it is not difficult to predict the outcome of his proposal which in itself is a recipe for a rule of the mob by ill- equipped men as we have witnessed since 1966.

    General Babangida, they said, did not disappoint at all with his famed Maradonic peccadilloes – three statements in as many hours – whilst famously throwing one of his spokespersons – one we must say, who self-righteously decided to input himself into the banalities he was sent to deliver, by adding his own, special anti-Buhari diatribe, and has since been running from pillar to post when law enforcement came calling, right under the bus.

    Nigerians, the smart people that they are, can see ‘the collusion, and the treachery of the generals’ as they remember, only too well, all those serpentine meetings on the Minna hilltop as Buhari was battling for dear life in a London hospital.

    Lest the columnist be egregiously misrepresented, let me remind my readers that nothing here should be taken as justifying the self-inflicted woes of the Buhari government. I have written my hands sore deprecating the president’s unexplainable clannishness which, saw almost the entire Nigerian security architecture in the hands of northerners, and was recently demonstrated in the re call of Prof Usman Yusuf, the Executive Secretary of the National Health Insurance Scheme, a man under EFCC investigation over an alleged, humongous N919m fraud, who should have been made to first clear himself of this grave allegation. This is a big slur on the President’s number one programme – the anti-corruption war which, very encouragingly, successfully retrieved about N500B from our yesterday thieves in 2017. How unfortunate.

    The same regret must go to the poor handling of the matter of the murderous Fulani herdsmen which has run the entire country into a stupefying tailspin these past few weeks. I have written severally on these pages, counselling that the fact that the president is Fulani and owner of cattle, make it incumbent on him to quickly find a lasting solution to what has turned the entire North Central into a killing field. It is unbelievable that being so close to the problem, the president did not realise that, if not properly handled, and on time, it has considerable potential of significantly, if not fatally, affecting his acceptance in key areas of his party’s support. It is sincerely hoped that the Army’s Operation Cat Race now being put in place to fight herdsmen attacks, would not be a flash in the pan even though Nigerians are already sceptical, given the ethnic configuration of the leadership of our security agencies, about the possibility of these murderous elements being fought with the same ferocity as the equally terrible Boko Haram vermins.

    In concluding, let me just say that it is the wish of most Nigerians that our two respected military heads of state and the Bishop, would be kind enough to allow Nigerians choose their leaders in an atmosphere of peace, and concord, at transparent elections, without any unnecessary hectoring.

    We can only hope that this is not too much to ask.

  • 2019: IBB’s camp split over Obasanjo’s coalition

    2019: IBB’s camp split over Obasanjo’s coalition

    There is anxiety in the camp of ex-President Ibrahim Babangida as the ex-military leader and political associates consider if he should join the Coalition for Nigeria Movement (CNM) or not.

    There were indications that Babangida is under pressure to distance himself from the former President Olusegun Obasanjo movement and rather limit his contributions to his thoughts on the way forward for the nation.

    Findings revealed that Babangida met with some of his associates during the week to discuss the likelihood of joining CNM or abstaining from the group.

    Babangida’s controversial advice to incumbent President Muhammadu Buhari allegedly caused a sharp disagreement in his family and political camp, leading to prompt release of a second one attributed to his “friends.”

    Further findings revealed that the disagreement in his camp accounted for the ex-military president’s refusal to disown the second statement.

    Most of his associates reportedly kicked against joining forces with Obasanjo to form any coalition.

    The differences in his camp informed a series of shuttles to Minna by some of his associates and consultations with a few others like a former Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, AVM Hamza Abdullahi on the phone.

    Checks confirmed that Babangida also had “frank sessions” with former National Security Adviser, Gen. Aliyu Gusau, ex-Interim National Secretary of the Peoples Democratic Party(PDP), Sen. Ben Obi, and a former Director-General of the National Intelligence Agency, Brig. Halilu Akilu(rtd) during the week in Minna.

    A highly placed source disclosed that: “There is anxiety in the camp of Babangida  on whether or not to join Obasanjo’s coalition.  Some of his associates and relations(including children) had been prevailing on him to limit his contributions on 2019 to his thoughts and recommendations on the two-party  system.

    “In fact, the scion of the family, Mohammed Babangida,  some associates and friends were behind the temperate second statement on Sunday which actually the ex-military President did not know about.

    “So, as I am talking to you, the ex-military leader and his associates had been weighing options on the way forward.

    “Some of his longtime associates and children are opposed to any gang-up in the twilight of his life. They also cited the alleged harassment  of Mohammed during the administration of ex-Obasanjo over the investigation of the Chairman of Globacom, Mike Adenuga, on why Babangida should not dignify the CNM.”

    When contacted, a close ally of Babangida added: “Gusau, Obi and Akilu risked the pains of traveling by road to discuss with Babangida on available options and what should be the group’s position.

    “The issue is more complicated because another die-hard loyalist of Babangida, ex-Governor Olagunsoye Oyinlola is the Interim Coordinator of CNM. I cannot tell you the outcome because they were locked upstairs for frank talks. I think they are really weighing options.”

    Findings also revealed that the political future of Mohammed might have been responsible for the discordant tunes in Babangida’s camp.

    Another highly-placed source said: “The political calculations in Niger State now is that Mohammed Babangida should seek election into the Senate in 2019 to prepare himself for a future governorship role.

    “Since the military elite in Niger State dictate the political tempo, there were indications that with Governor Abubakar Sani Bello(who is a son of a respected retired military officer), a Senatorial slot will be easier for Mohammed on the ticket of the platform of the All Progressives Congress (APC).

    “The position of some of the associates of the ex-Military leader is that the Babangida dynasty should be preserved by propping up Mohammed Babangida for a political office.”

    Responding to a question, the source added: “Actually in 2015, the governorship slot was zoned to Zone C in Niger State. Everyone was pressurizing Mohammed to come out to vie for the slot because his ancestral home(Wushishi) is in the same zone with Kontagora where Governor Bello hails from.

    “But Babangida, who was in Germany in 2015, asked Mohammed not to vie for the slot because the time was unripe. We were all shocked but we conceded to the ex-Military President that he knew better.

    “I think Babangida did not want to create division within the military elite in Niger State because of the respect they have for Col. Sani Bello(rtd), who is the father of the present governor, Abubakar Bello.

    “Also, Governor Bello is married to the daughter of a former Military Head of State, Gen. Abdulsalami Abubakar who is very close to Babangida. Asking Mohammed to contest in 2015 will amount to a brother fighting the husband of his “sister.”

  • Only ‘popular movement’ can rescue Nigeria, says Obasanjo

    Only ‘popular movement’ can rescue Nigeria, says Obasanjo

    Former President Olusegun Obasanjo has said there is need for a popular movement to enthrone progressive leadership required to make Nigeria a great country in Africa. He said Nigeria has disappointed Africa in providing needed leadership in post-military era.

    Although, the ex-president did not specifically mention any regime; he said the nation deserved a better leadership to enable it play front role in Africa’s socio-economic development. He said the only way out of the development quagmire in which the nation plunged is for the masses to form non-partisan “popular movement” that would serve as credible alternative to the current national leadership.

    The former president spoke yesterday at the 15th Lecture and International Leadership Symposium with the theme: Leadership and Performance in Africa: The Challenge of the Continent’s Economic Competitiveness, organised by Centre for Value Leadership (CVL) in Muson Center, Onikan, Lagos. CVL is a leadership think-tank founded by Prof. Pat Utomi.

    Obasanjo said: “The first generation of leaders in this country, whatever you say about them, gave us independence. They helped in the transition from colonial power to indigenous leadership. Within their knowledge, their experience and exposure, these first generation leaders did their best. But then, they made mistake, which led to the transition to the military era. Later, there was another transition to democracy.

    “The nation has also witnessed transition from one civilian regime to another within a political party and from one political party to another. But, there is another important transition which the country requires right now; this is the transition to popular movement to give people credible alternatives. Until we are able to achieve this, we are not going anywhere.”

    Read Also: ‘Obasanjo’s coalition full of corrupt politicians’

    Obasanjo, who made a dramatic walk to the podium by removing his agbada (flowing gown), noted that Nigeria must appreciate and acknowledge its diversity if there must be socio-economic development. He said the much-talked-about development must be predicated on provision of key infrastructure to power the economy.

    The ex-president also said security matter should not be politicised or treated as emotional issue, noting that insecurity does not recognise anyone’s emotion or cultural beliefs. Obasanjo said he disagreed with a statement credited to former United States (U.S.) President Barack Obama, who said Africa needed to build strong institutions and not strong men.

    “I believe we need both strong institutions and strong leaders. If there are no strong leaders, we will not be able to build strong institutions. If strong institutions are established and our leaders are weak, those strong institutions will collapse,” Obasanjo said.

    He warned the nation on the consequence of disparity in education across geopolitical zones, saying what could be worse than Boko Haram could arise if education gap is not bridged.

    Obasanjo said Africa must get leadership, governance and development right before the continent could achieve real growth. He said Africa still lagged behind in economic growth because some leaders don’t understand basic principle of economics of demand and supply.

    He said countries on the continent must share common prosperity to achieve accelerated development.

    He said: “It is the height of stupidity if you think of yourself alone and you do think not other. In Africa, if Nigeria thinks of itself alone and does not think of the rest of Africa, it would be foolish.”

    In his keynote speech, former Director of United Nations Industrial Development Organisation (UNIDO) and a presidential candidate in Sierra Leone, Mr Kandeh Yumkella, said African leaders must manage demographic transition and invest in energy and infrastructure. He said education, skill acquisition and women empowerment must play key role in the continent’s development policies.

  • 2019: Looters out to demonize Buhari to regain power, say FONGON

    2019: Looters out to demonize Buhari to regain power, say FONGON

    The Forum of Non-Governmental Organizations in Nigeria (FONGON) on Tuesday accused those who looted the nation’s treasury of being behind the campaign against the second term aspiration of President Muhammadu Buhari.

    The forum, which comprises 200 NGOs with three million members, askednNigerians not to fall for the trap of looters who want to regain power through the backdoor.

    It faulted the letter and a statement by both ex-President Olusegun Obasanjo and a former Military President, Gen. Ibrahim Babangida on Buhari’s re-election bid.

    It said it has launched nationwide intermittent rallies to checkmate any plot to truncate Buhari’s bid for re-election. FONGON made the disclosures in a February 6 letter to Buhari which was made public  at a  rally at the Unity Fountain in Abuja.

    The rally signaled the series of sensitization campaign of Nigerians to allow Buhari another term in office.

    Amid drumbeats and dancing, the FOGON members wielded placards with many inscriptions.

    Some of the inscriptions were “Southwest Solidarity Forum Declares Support for PMB,” Sai Baba Beyond 2019, “200, 000 Unemployed Graduates Enlisted To N-power,” “ Nigeria’s Stock Market Now One,”

    “Inflation has fallen for 11 consecutive months,”  Performing PMB Beyond 2019.”

    Others were “N24.7 billion saved monthly through TSA; Nigeria’s Stock Market is now one of the performing in the world; 5.2 million primary schools in 28, 249 schools are being fed daily by FG

    The letter, which was read by the National Coordinator of FONGON, Comrade Wole Badmus, said the NGOs came together to “serve as a counter-voice to the nay sayers and looters who are increasingly

    dominating the polity.”

    FONGON said: “Mr. President, we have chosen to come out this time because there seems to be an orchestrated and well-choreographed campaign going on across the country at the moment to demonize Buhari administration and hoodwink unsuspecting Nigerians into believing that the administration has achieved nothing since assuming office.

    “The looters, economic saboteurs and unpatriotic fellows are feeling the heat of Buhari administration’s fight against corruption.

    “They are earnestly yearning for a return to the immediate unedifying past in which the national treasury became the piggy bank of a few. They also want to pave the way for the return of the same people who brought the country to where it was before you assumed office.

    “Your Excellency, the recent spate of letter and memo writing is not an accident. We believe it is aimed at discouraging you from running for a constitutionally-guaranteed second term which they are afraid will put Nigeria on irreversible path of probity, prudence and progress.

    “We believe there will be more letters and more voices urging you not to run. And we urge you (Mr. President) not to heed such calls. Those who are for you are more than those who are against you.

    Read Also:  Buhari  writes Senate, withholds assent on three bills

    “That is why we have decided to come out. We are concerned that unless an urgent action is taken, the voices of these people, whom we believe are being sponsored by looters and their ilk, may become the dominant voices.”

    In spite of the criticism of the President, FONGON insisted that Buhari had been doing well.

    The Forum added: “Mr. President, your administration is putting Nigeria on a solid footing. We believe you have what it takes to do it but that all Nigerians must give you their unalloyed support because it will not be an easy task. After all, it is easy to destroy than to build

    “We (members of the FONGON) will match the naysayers’ propaganda for propaganda, memo for memo, and rally for rally. We will go from door-to-door, house-to-house, city-to-city and state-to-state to let Nigerians know the good work that your administration is doing.

    “As we say never again to the enemies of the nation, looters and criminals taking charge of our nation’s affairs, we pray that Allah will continue to strengthen, guide and protect you. We urge God to give you more wisdom and good health to pilot the affairs of this great nation.

    It asked Buhari to ignore calls not to vie for second term in office.

    “We ask you not to hesitate to go for another four-year term to enable you to go for another four-year term to enable you to consolidate on the good work that you have started,” the Forum said.

    “There is another side to the story that is being told by some myth-sayers, treasury looters, and those who have ruin and destroyed this country in the past. We are doing this to send a message that there is another side to their story. That the story they are telling the world is either half-truth or completely falsehood. “That what takes bad men to destroy the society is what take good men to stand aloof and do nothing. We have kept quiet enough. We have watched them enough and we found out that enough is enough. Of course, you are aware of series of letters written here and there by people who openly raped this country and brought the country to economic comatose and political quagmire.

    “They are now trying to turn themselves to democratic champion. We cannot watch that. President Buhari is trying to resolve a problem that took over 16 years to destroy. It is not easy. The man is trying and doing his best. He is achieving a lot in security, anticorruption war and the next thing is trying to turn the economy around.

    “He has taken the nation out of recession which is highly commendable. Our foreign reserve is now over $40 billion which is unprecedented.”

    Reacting to a letter ex-President Olusegun Obasanjo and a statement by a former Military President, General Ibrahim Babangida, Badmus said the two leaders were wrong in their assessment of President Buhari.

    He said: “It is only God that cannot be wrong. They are wrong as human. If you look at the issue of nepotism being talked about Obasanjo, he did it most in his regime. Look at the military appointments he made, all of them are Christians.”

    “We want to let the world know that both Obasanjo and IBB’s letter and statement  are purely political to distract the government. They are to distract the government. We are using this rally to tell president Buhari not to be distracted but to focus on his work on nation building. History and posterity will absorb him, Nigerians will absorb and support him.”

    “Somebody who annulled a free and fair election in the history of this country, after spending eight years in power, somebody who used constitutional two term in office and tried to use unconstitutional means to get third term cannot claim to be democratic. They are now trying to tell somebody who have spent less than three years not to run for an election. This is a contradictory contradiction, we will not take it,” Badmus added.

     

  • Obasanjo’s third force

    Obasanjo’s third force

    Much of the focus on recent open letter by former President Olusegun Obasanjo to President Buhari has for obvious reasons, centred on aspects dealing with reasons why the latter should not seek a second term. And in a political terrain where high premium is placed on the person who occupies that elated seat, the part of the country he comes from and other inchoate considerations, this should not surprise anyone.

    If discussions are largely tainted by these and others that hinge on the mundane and the most parochial, Nigerians are reacting true to type. It is not surprising that those who have joined the conversation have found themselves unwittingly influenced by some of these considerations.

    Obasanjo’s letter reminiscent of the one he did on the ambition of former President Goodluck Jonathan on the heels of the last presidential election has thrown spanners into the wheel of the three year old regime of Buhari. Given that his letter to Jonathan contributed to the turn of events that truncated that regime, there is the feeling that some domino effect may follow his current damning verdict on the performance of the incumbent government. Though the language of his latest letter was mild in comparison with the acerbic, tendentious and dangerous allegations peddled in the one to Jonathan, Obasanjo took time to adduce reasons why he thinks Buhari should shelve his touted ambition to run for another term.

    Recalling his earlier observations on Buhari’s poor understanding of issues relating to the economy and his weakness playing in the foreign affairs sector, Obasanjo regretted that Buhari failed to make use of the abundant pool of technical know-how in the requisite areas to excel. He accused him of nepotism and deployments bordering on clannishness, poor understanding of the dynamics of internal politics that has left the country more divided than ever before and buck-passing by serially refusing to take responsibility.

    These are very serious and damning observations that cannot be dismissed with a wave of the hand. The issues are very clear and there have been wide spectrum of opinion on them before now. Perhaps, what Obasanjo did is to throw his with on them such that nobody can easily ignore again. So it is difficult to accuse him of any hidden agenda or bad faith in bringing these issues to the front burner. And even if he has some other hidden motive, the pervasiveness of the observed weaknesses provides sufficient cover for him.

    But perhaps, the most engaging and potentially explosive contribution Obasanjo made in the letter is his assessment of the two political parties – APC and PDP and their place in Nigeria’s political matrix. He disagreed that the PDP has weaned itself of its sordid past to be the harbinger for political re-engineering even as his assessment of the current performance of the APC also disqualifies it for that emerging national assignment.

    For him, the country is in a serious pass requiring some radical action to steer the ship of the nation aright. He bemoans the dearth of patriotic leadership, high inclination towards parochialism and tendencies that obfuscate nation-building and the attainment of greatness in the nearest future. For him, extant order denoted in the political leadership thrown up by the two big parties have become anachronistic and therefore incapable of serving the future interests of this country. That decadent and stale order must be dismantled to allow a new seed of leadership to geminate and flourish.

    His solution to this systemic decay lies in the emergence of a body of new leadership that is not tainted and corrupted by old persuasions denoted by the two leading parties which in his view, have outlived their usefulness. A third force – a group of patriotic and selfless Nigerians committed to the overall growth and development of the country will do the magic of re-inventing the country. His anchormen quickly launched the coalition last week in Abuja and explained the objective is to see a new Nigeria, give leadership of the country to knowledgeable and vibrant young men and women since the APC and PDP have not been able to meet the aspirations of Nigerians.

    Within this context, the promoters are rooting for the old order to give way in the fashion of the Kuhnian Revolution. They envision a new theory, new order or paradigm emerging to supplant existing theories.

    Following that tradition, Obasanjo wants us believe that the theoretical basis or foundation for the continued existence of the two leading parties has been flawed. But he failed to let us into the processes leading to such conclusions except relying heavily on his observations of their failings which at best, can only be consigned to the realm of educated guess. Educated guess is of very questionable empirical value. Moreover, he failed to establish how his concept of an amorphous coalition provides that suitable alternative.

    Yes, Obasanjo identified some of the problems buffeting the country including, poor leadership and primordial tendencies competing with the central authority for the loyalty of the citizens thus rendering nation-building a pipe dream. Their causative factors are both systemic and behavioural and cannot be remedied overnight through the aggregation of people of diverse persuasions into a make-shift coalition.

    A hurried arrangement in the fashion proposed is of very limited value in addressing the very fundamental institutional and attitudinal issues that have continued to be the country’s albatross. Ironically, Obasanjo is not comfortable referring to his coalition as a third force. He seems afraid of the radicalism implied in that terminology.

    But in shying away from that, he complicates the philosophical basis on the desideratum of an alternative change agent. That confusion runs through his letter and the explanation offered by his loyalists while launching the coalition.

    There is no clarity in stating that nothing stops the movement from satisfying the conditions for fielding candidates for elections and his vow to quit if the coalition morphs into a political party. How do you give leadership of the country to the knowledgeable and vibrant young men outside the platforms offered by existing political parties? How do you achieve that ambition and vision of a new Nigeria-a sharp departure from our decadent past through a motley assemblage of disorganized, disoriented and seemingly disgruntled crowd? And the people promoting the idea, how free are they from those systemic ills for which a new paradigm has to emerge?

    It is obvious there is some confusion on the original philosophical vision of the coalition and what we are now being made to believe. That vision collapsed immediately they repudiated the idea of a third force. It collapsed the moment they prevaricated on whether the group will morph into a political party and field candidates. It is also obvious in the discordant tunes by Obasanjo and his henchmen.

    The problem Obasanjo ran into can be understood. He left the PDP on his own choice and helped in the emergence of the APC. Then, he had hurriedly announced his disinterest in partisan politics. From his observatory, he found out that there is no difference between the two leading parties. Some form of intervention is therefore required to steer the ship of the country alright. It goes without saying. The current parasitic and oligarchic class of leadership that emerges on the basis of political exigency rather than competence and merit must to give way for the type of vision Obasanjo nurses to flourish.

    But the processes to it have to be more far-reaching and radical than gathering and aggregating people under a coalition with no clearly defined objectives on how they intend to take over power. A third force should offer more attraction than the current equivocation the coalition represents. The third force or coalition should champion the restructuring of the country.  Restructuring will substantially address the issues Obasanjo raised.

     

  • Obasanjo playing politics with letter to Buhari, says Tinubu 

    Obasanjo playing politics with letter to Buhari, says Tinubu 

    The recent open letter by former President Olusegun Obasanjo  to President Muhammadu Buhari to decline seeking reelection next year is all politics, National Leader of the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC), Asiwaju Bola Tinubu, declared yesterday.

    Tinubu told reporters in Owerri,Imo State ,that Obasanjo could have conveyed his opinion to Buhari privately.

    The former Lagos State governor, in company with the pioneer National Chairman of the APC, Chief Bisi Akande, was in the Imo State capital on his way to Awka, Anambra State, to attend the funeral of Second Republic Vice President Alex Ekwueme.

    He also said the APC would respond at the appropriate time to the emergence of the Coalition for Nigeria being promoted by Obasanjo.

    Tinubu said  Obasanjo ought to have exploited a better way of communicating his observations about the Buhari  administration other than his open letter if  he was not politically motivated.

    He said: ” I think Obasanjo was playing politics with his public letter. That’s all I see.

    “He could have used other means; he met him (Buhari) in the AU (Africa Union) too.

    “He has a way of discussing privately, but the letter is being responded to by the government.

    “Obasanjo wrote it about the government. It is a very good awareness on his part and they are both (Obasanjo and Buhari) from the same background.

    “I believe that is the doctrine of military officers (retired) because he has unrestricted access to the President, either through the Council of State or by any other means that he needs to see the current president privately and he was his junior in the army.”

    The APC leader then said jokingly that the letter was not written to him.

    In the Coalition for Nigeria, Tinubu said it was still too early to respond to the development,

    The APC, he said, would  respond to the emergence of the coalition  at the “appropriate time ” .

    His words:  “The appropriate time is not now for response on the Coalition Movement but we are in a democracy.

    “We are in a country that is a signatory to the Charter of the United Nation  which guarantees free movement, free association and free speech.”

    On the reason for his visit, he said: “The governor (Rochas Okorocha)  is a very good friend and the government that is here is our government, the APC government.

    “We are here to pay final respect to the gentleman and nationalist, Alex  Ekwueme.”

  • Obasanjo’s coalition selfish agenda—Arewa youths, Clark, others

    Obasanjo’s coalition selfish agenda—Arewa youths, Clark, others

    More verbal assaults came the way of former President Olusegun Obasanjo from across the country yesterday over his latest pet project, the Coalition for Nigeria, and call on President Muhammadu Buhari to reject seeking re-election next year.

    Ijaw National Leader and convener of the Pan-Niger Delta Forum (PANDEF), Chief Edwin Clark, warned Nigerians against heeding Obasanjo’s advice because “he is a major cause of Nigeria’s leadership crisis.”

    The immediate past governor of Edo State,Mr.Adams Oshiomhole,asked Obasanjo to allow Buhari make his own decision and reminded the former president that he (Obasanjo) is  not one of Buhari’s advisers,while influential Itsekiri leader, Sir Amorighoye S.Mene, dismissed the new movement as another gimmick by the former president to hijack the narrative of the country.

    The Arewa Youth Assembly said Obasanjo should leave Nigerians alone to “decide who governs us’.

    But,the former president has a supporter in the Secretary General of Arewa Consultative Forum (ACF), Mr. Anthony Sani,  who said the idea of the Coalition for Nigeria is far better than resort to violence or agitation for split by some Nigerians.

    Chief Clark told The Nation by the phone that the generality of Nigerians should not take what he called Obasanjo’s bait.

    The  way out of Nigeria’s leadership problem, according to Clark, is not going on massage Obasanjo’s ego.

    He said:”While we accept part of Obasanjo’s message, as far as it concerns the state of the nation, one won’t accept Obasanjo, the messenger, because it’s all pretence.

    “For him to say he’s going to champion the movement, he’s a failure already.

    “There’s nothing Obasanjo has to offer to Nigerians. He was the president of this country for eight years.

    “He was military head of state for about three  years. As a civilian president, he created corruption in Nigeria; he legalised corruption in Nigeria.

    “He’s just pretending. I wonder how Obasanjo would help with the new leadership. Nigerians should not follow him.

    “Who are they deceiving in Nigeria?

    “Let the message be a lesson for the APC, PDP and other Nigerians.

    “There are many other parties in Nigeria. We have over 68 parties in Nigeria. We don’t need any political force or a new party championed by Obasanjo.

    “It’s a deceit; it’s an insult to the people of Nigeria.”

    Also speaking, Sir Amorighoye, Secretary of the Itsekiri Leaders of Thought (ILoT), said: “The idea is to adopt an existing party which is Obasanjo’s specialty; go to a party and impose himself on the party.

    “It is not an answer to Nigeria’s leadership crisis. The permanent answer to our leadership crisis is restructuring. We need to go back to the foundation; we need to address the lies.”

    In its own reaction, the Arewa Youths Assembly in a statement signed by its Speaker, Mohammed Salihu, alleged that Nigeria’s democracy ,under Obasanjo between 1999 and 2007,was almost derailed because of his leadership style.

    The Arewa youths said:”In 2006 towards 2007, the powerful OBJ not satisfied with the eight-year tenure mandate given to him by Nigerians, decided to manipulate the constitution to pave the way for yet another term called Third Term.

    “Thank God  for notable Nigerians who resisted the plan and rendered it toothless. Since that time till date, even after handing over power to the late President Shehu Yar’Adua, OBJ has refused to lie  low as being demonstrated by his predecessors and others.

    “The Northern part of Nigeria which overwhelmingly supported OBJ despite his rejection by his Southwest home, later became the worst hit. The North was set against the North. Tribalism, religious sentiments, political hatred as a result of divide and rule principle became glaring. The North became divided against itself, all due to his selfish need to control political power in Nigeria.”

    However, the Secretary General of the Arewa Consultative Forum (ACF), Mr. Anthony N.  Sani, described the emergence of the Coalition for Nigeria as democracy in action.

    He said: “While there may be national consensus on problems of a nation, there is often no similar national consensus on methods of solution.

    “And that is why multiparty democracy allows political parties to present distinct methods of solving the national problems as contained in the party manifestos which are used to canvass for the needed mandate for implementation.

    “Those who disagree with the approaches and style of sitting governments are at liberty to join a party of their choice or form a party of their choice and campaign for electoral mandate instead of resorting to violence or ways to split the country.

    “We have seen the feats by some young men in France and Australia who worked hard by mobilizing the citizens and won the elections to become presidents. They never allowed frustrations from the challenges of living to becloud their judgements and resorted to violence.

    “If the Coalition for Nigeria would provide a viable alternative platform, so be it. That is democracy in action. After all, democracy without a viable opposition is a sham.”

    “If the Coalition for Nigeria will bring about the needed cultural renaissance into the polity, it will be a welcome idea. But whether the former president has what it takes to bring about such cultural renaissance in the polity is yet to be seen.”

    Mr. Oshiomhole, emerging from a meeting with Buhari at the Presidential Villa, Abuja, yesterday pledged his support for a second term for the president.

    He said: “I came to wish the President a happy new year and appreciate him for his leadership of the country. As an APC activist and loyalist, I’m to reassure him of my absolute and total support for his government and even for 2019.” He added: “Everything taken into account, I believe that every Nigerian who wants us to sustain some of the renewed vigour to deal with one of the most challenging problems that Nigeria has faced, namely corruption and things like that, you cannot but appreciate the president and all that has been done under his leadership this past two years and some months.”

    Asked if he was suggesting that  Buhari should not heed Obasanjo’s advice on next year’s election, Oshiomhole said: “I’m not sure when I see the list of the advisers that  Obasanjo is one of the advisers.

    “But I also recall with respect that the day Obasanjo was swearing  in some of his advisers, he did say that anybody who was his adviser could advise him, he would make his own decisions. And I think that principle still stands.”

    Calabar-based lawyer and Public Affairs Analyst, Leonard Anyogo,  is all for the coalition,saying: “It is a welcome development as our constitutional democracy allows for freedom of association and lawful aspirations.”