Tag: Olusegun Obasanjo

  • 2015: Obasanjo seeks prayers

    2015: Obasanjo seeks prayers

    Former President Olusegun Obasanjo yesterday said only God knows who will become leaders at various levels at different times.

    He urged Christians to keep “fasting and praying” for God to see the country through its challenges.

    Obasanjo said early in his life, even as a soldier, Nigeria witnessed many turbulent periods.

    According to him, while everybody thought the end had come, God, in his benevolence, saw Nigeria through its turmoil.

    The former President spoke in his Abeokuta, Ogun State mansion on Chief Segun Osoba Hill-Top, when the Pentecostal Fellowship of Nigeria (PFN), led by Dr Felix Omobude, visited him.

    Obasanjo was confident that regardless of what the present challenges of the country are, God will see Nigerians through.

    He said Nigeria is a “God’s project” and that the Almighty has kept the nation united, despite its war experience, among other challenges.

    Obasanjo said: “If there is anything that I would ask of you, it is that you should never stop fasting and praying for Nigeria. I always say I’m an incurable optimist about this country.

    “In my short span of life, I have seen a few unexpected things in this country, when we thought that the end would just happen. But God made us to scale through.

    “I personally never thought we would have a leader like (the late Gen. Sani) Abacha in this country. I was a victim (of his despotism) but God saw us through that situation.

    “There is no situation we see or worry about that God will not see us through. That is my belief and that is what gives me confidence. It gives me courage, it gives me the ability to work for the country’s unity.

    “No matter what is happening …all will be well. And those of you who believe all will be well for Nigeria should continue to shout Hallelujah. God has done it for us.”

  • 2015: Only God knows who becomes leaders – Obasanjo

    Ahead of another general elections in the country , Former President Olusegun Obasanjo Tuesday has  said only God knows who becomes leaders.

    He urged Christians to keep “fasting and praying” for God to see the country through its sundry challenges.

    The former President who spoke in his Abeokuta residence  when the leadership of the Pentecostal Fellowship of Nigeria(PFN), Dr Felix Omobude, paid him a courtesy visit.

    He expressed confidence that regardless of what the present challenges of the country are, God would see Nigerians through.

    Obasanjo said early in his life as a military man, he had seen the country witnessed many turbulent eras and that just as everybody  had thought the end was certain, God in his benevolence saw Nigeria through the ups and down.

    He said Nigeria is a “God’s project” and has kept her as one indivisible entity despite the experience of war among other challenging problems plaguing her.

    Obasanjo said :”If there is anything that I would ask of you, it is that you should never stop fasting and praying for Nigeria I always say that I’m an incurable optimist about  this country.

    “In my short span of life, I have seen a few unexpected things in this country when we thought that the end would just happen, but God made us to scale through.

    “I personally never thought we would have a leader like (late Sanni) Abacha in this country, I was a victim(of his despotism) but God saw us through that situation.

    “There is no situation we see or worry about that God will not see us through. That is my believe and that is what gives me confidence, it gives me courage, it gives me the ability to work for the country’s unity.

    “No matter what is happening, as me and the country, all will be well. And those of you who believe all will be well for Nigeria should continue to shout Hallelujah. God has done it for us.”

    In his remarks,  Omobude who arrived Obasanjo’s home in company of PFN leadership in the state as well as pastors  described Obasanjo as a “special treasure to Nigeria” who would continue to be pivotal  in the affairs of the country.

    Omobude however, assured that the PFN would not relent in its calling to pray for the peace, unity and progress of Nigeria, saying that is part of their pastoral duties to the country and its leaders.

  • At a time like this

    At a time like this

    If any era in Nigeria’s history qualified as one of heady optimism, it was the time leading to the inauguration of the Second Republic.

    The wounds of the civil war had healed faster than most people expected. Petrodollars accrued to the national exchequer faster than the authorities could figure out what to do with the new wealth. Biafra had provided powerful intimations of what black humanity can achieve when pursuing common purpose; a re-united Nigeria, home of the largest aggregation of black humanity, was going to take its rightful place in the global community, propelled by the dynamic leadership of Murtala Muhammed and Olusegun Obasanjo.

    Nigerians everywhere walked tall. Those studying abroad, most of them on government scholarships, rushed back on completion of their programmes, believing not only that home was where they belonged but that it was where their future lay. The Naira was worth almost two U.S. dollars. The economy was expanding, and jobs were there for the taking.

    In short, a future that would be marked by prosperity at home and major influence abroad was splendidly visible and clearly attainable.

    The 1979 Constitution, the fundamental law of the Second Republic, reflected the big thinking of that era, the planning for and investing in future political greatness, what with the American-style presidency and other institutions of state, just as a sprawling bureaucracy had planned for and invested in the nation’s future economic greatness.

    Framed by a team boasting some of the nation’s best and brightest, the Constitution was as bold and innovative as the times demanded, and just as comprehensive. It left nothing to chance.

    One of its more notable innovations, which has been attributed in the main to the per-eminent legal scholar Ben Nwabueze, was encapsulated in a Council of State composed of the President and the Vice President, all former presidents or heads of state, all former federal chief justices, the president of the Senate, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, all state governors, and the Federal Attorney-General.

    Its remit, re-stated in the 1999 Constitution, is to advise the President with respect to his duties on a wide range of subjects in general, and on issues relating to the maintenance of public order in particular “when asked to do so.”

    This latter qualification makes it clear that the Council is an advisory body, pure and simple, and that it meets at the pleasure or convenience of the nation’s President. But it does not render it otiose.

    The underlying assumption was that the ex-officio members of the Council would be men and women who, having given of their best to their country, would stay splendidly above the fray and would never again seek elective office nor descend into the pit of partisanship. Thus, their good faith would never be in doubt.

    In a proper setting, the Council would be the repository of the nation’s collective wisdom and experience, a fount of inspiration, a moral force. It would be the body to turn to when the country is buffeted by strife and uncertainty – the very kind of period Nigeria is going through now.

    The nation is paralysed on practically every front. The ruling PDP is in disarray and scheming desperately to hold on to power. The economy is reported to be growing by leaps and bounds, but the nation slips farther and farther down the international misery index. Power supply remains fitful, impervious to the magic wand of privatisation.

    Interstate highways remain dangerously cratered. Youth unemployment, already alarmingly high, is soaring. Fully one-fourth of the crude oil lifted from our shores is stolen, and record-keeping of what is not stolen is scandalously shoddy.

    The immediate future promises only more of the same.

    And at the top, diffidence reigns. Not even the most fervent chants of Transformation can drown out the din of the rank innocence, the utter bewilderment up there.

    It is precisely at a time like this that the Council of State should be deliberating and helping to chart a way forward. However, that very concept has turned out to be another instance in the nation’s life of how a beautiful theory was murdered by a gang of brutal facts.

    The higher echelon of the Council today is not composed of the kind of people the framers of the 1979 Constitution had in mind – elder statesmen whose moral force would flow from exemplary rectitude and distinguished service; persons who would stay splendidly above the fray and would never again seek elective office nor descend into the pit of partisanship.

    General Yakubu Gowon, forever radiating goodwill, would pray and pray but nothing would change. Former president Obasanjo could just take over the proceedings to deliver another blistring missive. Shehu Shagari would turn up more from habit than conviction. General Muhammadu Buhari, still chafing from the outcome of the last presidential election, will not attend a meeting called by a person he regards as a usurper.

    General Babangida says he has finally given up trying to return to power, but he is nothing if not calculating. What example or inspiration can anyone expect from Ernest Shonekan? General Abdulsalami Abubakar is preoccupied tending to the vast fortune he acquired in just one year in the saddle and shopping around for more.

    The state governors could turn the meeting into a forum for settling once and for all – by fisticuffs if necessary – the lingering puzzle of which number is bigger: 19 or 16?

    It is therefore understandable that President Goodluck Jonathan is in no hurry to convene a meeting of the Council, as some of its statutory members are urging him to do. He is not constitutionally obliged to do so. To convene the Council in the present charged atmosphere would be the closest thing to political suicide. I doubt whether a meeting would serve any useful purpose.

    But the drift cannot continue. Dr Jonathan must move quickly to arrest it by reaching out beyond his present inner circle to enlist help from disinterested men and women of undoubted goodwill and sound judgment, people who can tell him what he needs to know rather than what they think he would like to hear.

    Meanwhile, it would help enormously if he travelled less, listened more, and devoted more time to the serious reading that improves the mind and enlarges vision.

  • Jonathan vs Sanusi: Stakeholders urge caution

    Jonathan vs Sanusi: Stakeholders urge caution

    The letter from the Central Bank Governor (CBN), Sanusi Lamido Sanusi alleging that $49.8 billion was not remitted by Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) to the Federation Account raised dust last week. President Goodluck Jonathan’s advice that Sanusi should resign for allegedly leaking the document to former President Olusegun Obasanjo, has met with varied reactions, with stakeholders calling for truce, reports COLLINS NWEZE.

    Unprecedented. That was the simple interpretation a senior banker gave to President Goodluck Jonathan’s advice to the Governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria, Sanusi Lamido Sanusi to resign.

    Jonathan had accused Sanusi of leaking a letter on the supposed non-remittance of $49.8 billion by the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) to the Federation Account to former President Olusegun Obasanjo. This formed part of the kernel of a scathing letter Obasanjo wrote to Jonathan.

    While denying the allegation, Sanusi was quoted to have rejected the President’s advice, arguing, quite rightly, that it would take the Senate’s two-thirds to sack him. Expectedly, the development has elicited varied reactions from across the divide.

    Many who spoke on the issue have called for caution on the part of the President in the interest of the economy. They said it was left for Sanusi to either take the advice or leave it, adding that the President lacks the power to kick him out.

    They referred to Section 11 Sub-section (2) (f) of the CBN Act of 2007, which stipulates that the CBN Governor cannot be removed by mere pronouncement of a president. The section gave the conditions under which the Governor can be removed, such as the Governor being convicted by a court; where he is declared bankrupt, or by the President after securing the backing of two-thirds majority of the Senate. “A person shall not remain a Governor, Deputy Governor or Director of the Bank if he is removed by the President: Provided that the removal of the Governor shall be supported by two-thirds majority of the Senate praying that he be so removed.”

    Chukwuemeka Eze, Lead Counsel, Eze & Associates, said President Jonathan is aware that Sanusi cannot be removed by mere advice. “The President cannot remove him and he knows. That is why he advised him to resign, and mind you, resignation is a voluntary act. The Governor can take the advice or decline. If the Governor says he is not leaving, there is no law that can remove him. Legally speaking, Sanusi’s tenure is sealed till June 2.”

    Eze said the best bet is to allow him serve out his tenure because the heat that will be generated by a continued debate on the matter would be more injurious to the economy than forcing him to go.

    However, Eze said based on the sensitive nature of his position in the economy, Sanusi should have, firstly, written the NNPC to reconcile the figures. If the NNPC failed to give him the needed response, then, he could notify the President.

    Ekene Odum, Senior Lecturer, Labour Law at the Lagos State University (LASU), said the CBN Governor was appointed by the President, and this takes effect after the Senate confirmation. “The President cannot just wake up and say Sanusi should go. The President can suspend him. He can be disciplined, but can’t be removed without the concur of the Senate,” he said.

    He admitted that as the Chief Economist of the Federation, the leaked letter was a major embarrassment, adding that the Governor was too hasty to write the President. “Such writing has the capacity to cause confusion in both the local and international markets. Still, it would have made Sanusi a hero were the figures gotten totally right. But he made a statement only the brave could make,” he said.

    He continued: “If it is confirmed that the President asked him to go, it will be an unfortunate scenario that could heat up the polity and economy. Remember that $49.8 billion is different from $10 billion. Still, $10 billion is a huge amount of money.”

    He said despite the stalemate, the President should allow him to do his job and not push him out of office, having performed creditably at the CBN.

    “It is human to err, but that should not take away his glory. Until he leaves, he still has the right to advise the President on economic matters, but whether such advice will be taken or not remains a different matter entirely. The President has technocrats that can advise him on economic matters, but to stampede or disgrace him out of office is not right,” he explained.

    Odum insisted that it was only during the military era that a sitting CBN Governor could be forced out of office, adding that there has never been any such precedence in constitutional democracy. “During the military era, yes, he could be forced out. But in the era of constitutional democracy, it has never happened,” he said.

    However, Dr. Austin Nweze, Senior Lecturer, Lagos Business School, said even though some people are lauding Sanusi for a job well done, he has caused a lot of problems for the economy, saying the President’s order that he quits is in order and should be respected.

    He said Sanusi should have confirmed the right figures on NNPC remittances before writing the President, adding that such attribute is unbecoming of the Central Bank Governor, the fallout of which will be a minus for the economy. “It is definitely going to affect the economy negatively,” he said.

    He said the Governor discouraged banks from taking business risks, which has affected the lenders’ drive for businesses. “He is long-overdue. The President should have sacked him three years ago. There is urgent need to rectify the damages he has done to the economy. If he leaves now, he will be the first CBN Governor to be sacked. What the President has told him is that he does not have confidence in him,” he said.

    Bismarck Rewane, Managing Director, Financial Derivatives Company Limited, said the President may not have told Sanusi to resign. According to him, Sanusi’s position remains strategic to the economy and if the President wanted to advise him to resign, it won’t be on the pages of a newspaper. “I don’t think that the government can say so. Until I am convinced, I won’t comment on the matter. I doubt the authenticity of the letter. I need to observe before commenting,” he said.

    Ademola Areago, a Constitutional lawyer based in Lagos, said if Sanusi must go, such act will lead to all kinds of signals. Firstly, such act will create feelings of political and economic instability in the country. “The CBN is banker to the Federal Government and the CBN Governor is also the Economic Adviser to the President. Now, if he bothers to give advice at all, what type will he be giving?,” he asked.

    Sanusi has the key to the strong room and vault of the country and the way he leaves is important. “The whole world is watching because it has not happened in any country before. The way the information was handled was wrong. It raises the issue of confidence and investors both local and international are watching,” he said.

    He argued that the fact that the President made his intention to remove him public is enough damage to the economy. That, he said, means that he is working against the President’s will.

    “This type of situation is unprecedented. He is not asking him to go because of inefficiency. For now, Sanusi is hanging on to the law. It will not be easy at all because the statement will be sending all sorts of signals,” he said.

     

    Chairman, Nigeria Bar Association (NBA), Ikeja Branch, Monday Ubani, said the face-off portends great danger for the economy.

    He said Sanusi is in charge of the CBN’s vault and any altercation between him and the president is not healthy for the economy.

    Ubani said there is a breakdown of communication between President Jonathan and Sanusi, an indication that the apex bank’s helmsman may be frustrated about certain economic issues. “Sanusi does not want to be held accountable when something sinister happens to the economy. But President Jonathan must handle it with superior wisdom,” he said.

    The NBA boss agreed with Eze that Sanusi has the right not to resign because his position is tenured and must be allowed to run out. “Even if it is $1 billion that was found to be missing, there should be a ceasefire. President Jonathan should swallow his pride and allow the man to exhaust his tenure,” he said.

     

    The genesis of the problem

    The crisis started when Sanusi wrote the president alleging that $49.8 billion oil remittance that was supposed to have been paid by the Nigeria National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) to the Federation Account was missing.

    This letter, it was alleged, drew the ire of the President Jonathan who directed Sanusi to resign for allegedly leaking his letter on the “missing $49.8billion” to ex-President Olusegun Obasanjo based on which the former president wrote a damning letter to him.

    The CBN governor allegedly denied any wrong doing, insisting that he would not be stampeded out of office. He insisted that it is only the Senate that could remove him and not a presidential fiat.

    It is believed that a statement by the CBN spokesman that the governor had told the workers that he would no longer proceed on a pre-retirement leave is a direct confirmation of Sanusi’s preparedness to stand on the point he made when he allegedly spoke with the president on phone. Presidency officials could not be reached for comments at the time of going to press.

     

    CBN reacts

    CBN spokesman Mr. Ugo Okoroafor has confirmed that Sanusi said he would no longer proceed on terminal leave at a “family meeting” with the bank’s staff. He spoke to reporters in Abuja on Sanusi’s tenure after a news conference on the execution of the bank’s Payment System Vision 2020 (PSV 2020) strategy.

     

     

    Implications for economy

    The implication of Sanusi’s forced resignation, analysts say, would be quite negative. First, a lot of foreign management partners will lose confidence in the management of the economy while the independence of the institutions that are part of the Central Bank and participating in economic management will equally be negatively affected.

    According to the Managing Director, SP&S Consulting, Debo Adebayo, reducing the power and independence of the CBN would send a signal of retrogression at a time others central banks are moving towards greater autonomy to enable them handle intricate financial crises.

    He said a strong economy anywhere is tied to the effectiveness of the conduct of its monetary policy. “You see, the monetary policy is a serious business; it could be very, very terrible to have a country where the monetary policy direction is doubtful. When a government subjects the conduct of monetary policy to political influence, you are not going to have a strong economy,” he explained.

    According to him, such development could hamper the effectiveness of monetary policy and the management of the macro-economic framework of the country. “The survival of the CBN is at the heart of the survival of the economy,”he warned.

     

    Swimming in controversial waters

    Appointed in the midst of 2009 debt crisis, Sanusi, 51, fired the chief executives of eight lenders within four months of taking office after an audit found evidence of mismanagement and reckless lending.

    His push for stability in the currency has helped bring inflation down to below eight per cent.

    But Sanusi’s actions have never strayed from controversy. He never stopped antagonising lawmakers by criticising their spending and courting controversy for his outspoken views, most recently on China’s role in Africa.

    In December 2010, lawmakers demanded his apology for saying a quarter of the government’s spending on overheads went to parliament and that was damaging for the economy. He refused, saying his estimates were correct.

    Again, two years ago, lawmakers attempted to whittle down the bank’s powers by proposing an amendment to CBN Act, hoping to strip him of his position as chairman of the bank’s board. They also pushed to include more external members on the board and have the National Assembly approve the bank’s budget.

    More recently, he criticised China’s role in Africa, saying it contributed to the “deindustrialisation and underdevelopment” in the world’s poorest continent. Africa must shake off its “romantic view of China” and see it as a competitor that’s “capable of the same forms of exploitation as the west,” Sanusi warned.

     

    CBN’s constitutional roles

    The CBN is empowered to maintain price stability and ensure a non-inflationary growth. It also has the responsibility to ensure a sound and stable financial system in addition to other developmental functions. These mandates and functions are peculiar to central banks across the world and no other institution plays such roles.

    These special responsibilities are enormous and have continued to pose increasing challenges to central banks largely because developments in the domestic and international economies create challenges in the financial systems and the art of central banking.

    Globalisation exemplified by economic and monetary unions has equally increased the challenges to central banking.

    Analysts insist that the effective discharge of these responsibilities requires that central banks be totally independent and shielded from political interferences.

     

    Sanusi’s successor

    According to Sanusi, whoever will be picked by President Jonathan to take over at the apex bank must be able to develop the market. “Central banking has changed. I think the market has developed. To be honest, if any Central Bank Governor misbehaves, the market punishes the economy immediately. So, the market is a major factor. Even as a governor, by the time your capital market crashes, and your currency goes down, you will know that it is either you restore stability, or you are out of the job. That’s important,” he said at a media conference held last month in Lagos.

    Analysts have tipped some of the CBN deputy governors among Sanusi’s likely successor. Deputy Governor, Operations, Tunde Lemo; Deputy Governor, Economic Policy, Sarah Alade; and Deputy Governor, Financial System Stability, Kingsley Moghalu have been mentioned. Also linked with the job are: Managing Director, Asset Management Corporation of Nigeria (AMCON), Mustafa Chike-Obi; Managing Director, FirstBank of Nigeria, Bisi Onasanya and Managing Director, Access Bank, Aigboje Aig-Imoukuede and recently, Minister of Trade and Investment, Olusegun Aganga.

    Analysts insist the next governor will probably have a different outlook or perspective, but one thing that is sure, remains that the fallout of the altercations between the President Jonathan and Sanusi may have just begun.

  • Tukur begs Obasanjo: Please, don’t leave PDP

    Tukur begs Obasanjo: Please, don’t leave PDP

    The National Chairman of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Alhaji Bamanga Tukur, yesterday pleaded with former President Olusegun Obasanjo to rescind his decision to leave the party.

    The PDP, Tukur said in a statement, needs Obasanjo’s fatherly role and experience to get it on strong footing and make it more formidable.

    Obasanjo had, in a January 7, letter to Tukur and President Goodluck Jonathan indicated his intention to withdraw from the activities of the party citing in particular the ‘imposition’ of Alhaji Buruji Kashamu as leader of the party in the Southwest.

    The party chair said that Obasanjo’s withdrawal from the party at the approach of the governorship elections in Ekiti and Osun States would not do the PDP any good.

    He added that the party needed Obasanjo’s support and contribution in the struggle to reclaim lost grounds in the South West geopolitical zone.

    But he exonerated himself from the PDP crisis in the Southwest, saying: “We came in when we were threatened with contempt of court charges for not obeying the court’s order to dissolve the south-west zonal Executive and remove some officers of the party.

    “We complied with the court’s orders because of our belief in the rule of law and to avoid consequences of disobeying such orders.

    “It is my wish and prayer that such cordial and positive relationship will continue between your good self; former President and former Chairman of the Board of Trustees of our great party on one hand, and my humble self, the National Chairman of our party on the other hand.”

    On Kashamu, Tukur said the man “came to limelight in politics as a result of the role he played in the politics of Ogun State where both of you come from. He later became a rallying point in the Southwest following court orders in the series of cases brought about as a result of disagreements among leaders of the party in the Southwest and Ogun State in particular.

    “In my opinion, Buruji became a rallying point because of the absence of a zonal executive in the Southwest. This vacuum in the Southwest has made him the person to whom many members in all the chapters of the party in the zone approach for one form of assistance or the order”.

    Kashamu himself replied Chief Obasanjo, saying the former president was a beneficiary of his (Kashamu’s) wealth.

    Kashamu, in a statement, said Obasanjo was engaging in “wicked campaign of calumny and blackmail in his perceived loss of political relevance in Ogun State and the South West.”

    He denied allegation by Obasanjo that he is “a wanted habitual criminal…for whom extradition has been requested by the US Government…”

    He said the former president has made him a target following “his (Obasanjo’s) perceived loss of political relevance in Ogun State and the South West.”

  • Tukur to Obasanjo: Please, don’t leave PDP

    Tukur to Obasanjo: Please, don’t leave PDP

    The National Chairman of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Alhaji Bamanga Tukur has pleaded with former President Olusegun Obasanjo to rescind his decision to leave the party.

    In a statement late Saturday, Tukur said the party still needs Obasanjo’s fatherly role and experience to get the party on strong footing and to make it more formidable.

    Obasanjo had, in a letter dated January 7, 2014, written to Tukur and President Goodluck Jonathan indicating his decision to quit the ruling party.

    The party chair pleaded that the PDP has more pressing challenges, particularly in the coming governorship elections in Ekiti and Osun States as well as the 2015 general elections.

    The party, he said, needed Obasanjo’s input to confront the challenges, stressing that the need for continuous dialogue and stronger partnership among stakeholders had become imperative.

    He added that the party needed Obasanjo’s support contribution in the struggle to reclaim lost grounds in the South West geopolitical zone.

    Tukur expressed appreciation in the manner the former President presented his grievances on the way the leadership of the party handled the crisis in the Southwest zone of the party.

    “I thank you for your gesture and I pray that we shall all continue to dialogue and partner to move our party forward”, the party chairman said.

    The PDP chair explained that the crisis in the Southwest zone of the PDP had taken root before he assumed the leadership of the party, stressing that he did not act in any manner to aggravate the situation.

    According to him, neither the National Executive Committee (NEC) nor the National Working Committee of PDP took sides in the crisis that engulfed the Southwest zone of the party.

    Said he: “We came in when we were threatened with contempt of court charges for not obeying the court’s order to dissolve the south-west zonal Executive and remove some officers of the party.

    “We complied with the court’s orders because of our belief in the rule of law and to avoid consequences of disobeying such orders.

    “It is an honour that you deemed it fit and proper to intimate me with an issue important to your mind and to our party in the south-west zone.

    “It is my wish and prayer that such cordial and positive relationship will continue between your good self; former President and former Chairman of the Board of Trustees of our great party on one hand, and my humble self, the National Chairman of our party on the other hand.

    “Buruji Kasamu came to limelight in politics as a result of the role he played in the politics of Ogun State where both of you come from. He later became a rallying point in the south-west following court orders in the series of cases brought about as a result of disagreements among leaders of the party in the Southwest and Ogun State in particular.

    “In my opinion, Buruji became a rallying point because of the absence of a zonal executive in the Southwest. This vacuum in the Southwest has made him the person to whom many members in all the chapters of the party in the zone approach for one form of assistance or the order”.

    Tukur indicated the decision of the party to conduct a zonal congress in the South-west zone to elect new zonal executive, in compliance with the orders of the courts.

    For a successful conduct of the planned zonal congress, Tukur said Obasanjo and other leaders of the party from the zone ought to build a strong consensus for that purpose.

  • Tunde Lemo set to bow out

    Tunde Lemo set to bow out

    If reports from the corridors of Central Bank are anything to go by, the Deputy Governor of the Nigeria’s apex bank, Tunde Lemo, will bow out of the bank he has served for a decade a few days from now. News of Lemo’s imminent exit emerged about five months to the expiration of the tenure of the Governor of Central Bank, Sanusi Lamido Sanusi

    The Ogun State-born Head of Operations at the apex bank, who was appointed the Deputy Governor on January 1, 2004, is due to quit on January 15. He is said to be the oldest member of the current board of the CBN.

    It will be recalled that Lemo was reported to be nursing a political ambition in 2011 and that it was a matter of time that he would turn in his resignation letter to pursue his ambition. His alleged governorship ambition on the platform of the Peoples’ Democratic Party was even rumoured to have received the blessings of Chief Olusegun Obasanjo. Reports said he had a change of mind when it became obvious that the PDP had already anointed another candidate in the person of Gen. Tunji Olurin (rtd).

    Prior to his appointment as the Deputy Governor of CBN, Lemo was the MD/CEO of Wema Bank, which was then ranked as one of the 10 most profitable commercial banks in Nigeria, between 2000 and 2003. With 2015 around the corner, it is not clear if Lemo will be exhuming his buried political ambition.

  • ‘Jonathan’s  critics lack  ethical maturity’

    ‘Jonathan’s critics lack ethical maturity’

    THE Special Adviser to the President on Ethics and Values, Mrs. Sarah Jibril, has said those criticising President Goodluck Jonathan lack good manners and ethical maturity.

    Addressing reporters yesterday in Abuja during the Round Table on Cultural Diplomacy in Africa and Nigeria, Mrs Jibril noted that it was a wrong style of politics to insult an elected President of a country instead of exploring the right channels for raising observations.

    Though she did not mention the names of such critics, the 18-page open letter by former President Olusegun Obasanjo to Dr Jonathan on December 2, last year, contained some weighty allegations against the President.

    Mrs Jibril said: “Insulting the President is a bad definition of politics. There is a way you can raise observations. But I think they would have much more human civilisation input that you are talking to a person you voted for and he has avenues of being advised. But to take it personally to insult the President of the Federal Republic of your country, it means that person is showing the lack of home training, good manners and ethical maturity.

    “They are better advised to now show that, indeed, they …must also show that they have decorum of self-respect, mutual and national respect.

    “It boils down to philosophical bankruptcy or ignorance. It is a matter of personal ego for people to criticise rather than make contributions. It is the responsibility of the government to re-educate them.

    “I appreciate that Mr President is not responding to every insult that is coming up. Our business in leadership is tolerantly, patiently and lovingly to continue to educate people and explain what we are trying to do.”

    The presidential aide backed the National Assembly for voting against the bill on same-sex marriage.

    Mrs Jibril said the practice is alien to Nigerian culture.

    She said: “Our National Assembly has raised the issue of same-sex marriage. In Africa, we live in natural environments: we live with our animals at home and even in the forest and we have never seen where a male horse was mating another male horse; neither have we seen a female chicken hanging around with another female chicken. So, it is alien to us.”

    The Foreign Affairs Minister, Prof. Viola Onwuliri, who was represented at the round table by the Director of Training and Staff Welfare in the ministry, Uche Okeke, noted that Nigerians were high on the talk and low on actions concerning traditional practices.

    To ensure compliance with ethics and values in the country, she urged the office of the Special Adviser on Ethics and Values to set up a committee for the enforcement.

    The minister said the police did not have adequate manpower to ensure behavioural change.

    “Enforcement is weak in Nigeria. So, we should attach conditions or withhold some services until compliance is ensured. It is after this that you will start seeing behavioural change.” Prof Onwuliri said.

  • Letter to the President: “Third Term” as the Road to Anarchy

    Letter to the President: “Third Term” as the Road to Anarchy

    Two weeks ago I promised I will reproduce today an open letter I wrote to former president, Chief Olusegun Obasanjo, a little over seven years ago which somewhat predicted the sad and tragic predicament he’s found himself in recently, following his own earthshaking letter to his estranged godson, President Goodluck Jonathan. Hopefully, President Jonathan, his praise mongers and attack dogs – and the rest of us – will learn the lessons of the letter, among which are that we should always at least try to practise what we preach and always remember that in the end what we sow is what we reap. Below is the letter edited for space:

    Dear Mr. President,

    Last week, I reproduced in these columns an open letter I wrote to you 17 years ago on the occasion of the publication of what was your magnum opus titled Constitution for National Integration and Development. In reproducing the letter as a reminder that our past will always catch up with us, if we refuse to learn from it, I said the letter was a prelude to another one I had decided to write to you. This is the letter.

    It will be my second since you returned to power on May 29, 1999, this time as elected president. The first letter was published on these pages on May 11, 2005, nearly a year ago. In that letter, I said that you should learn the lesson that power is ephemeral and you should therefore perish the thought of overstaying your welcome. The letter was titled “The lesson of Power” and it was about “rumours” at that time that you, or at least your henchmen were scheming for a third term, some would say a lifetime agenda. For a long while you yourself artfully dodged questions on the issue, most famously when the visiting President of the World Bank, Mr. Paul Wolfowitz, asked you point-blank whether or not you wanted to extend your tenure.

    Sir, if you were an artful dodger of questions about extending your stay in office, several of your henchmen were categorical in their denials of such a scheme. Notable among these deniers were Deputy Senate President, Alhaji Ibrahim Mantu, your erstwhile political adviser, Professor Jerry Gana, your inter-party affairs adviser, Alhaji Lawal Batagarawa, and Chief Onyeama Ugochukwu, who until recently was executive chairman of the well-endowed Niger Delta Development Commission, NDDC.

    Most recently, Professor Julius Ihonvbere, who took over Gana’s job as your political adviser, dismissed all speculations about your third term agenda as political laziness. “They”, he said in an interview in the Sunday Independent of March 19, 2006, “are busy on TV and newspapers spreading stories about third term. That is political laziness”.

    Needless to say, in spite of your artful dodging and in spite of the categorical denials by some of your henchmen, the “rumours” of your third term agenda persisted. The reason, as I said in my first letter to you, was pretty obvious; there was a huge gap between what you and your henchmen said and what you all did.

    Just about two years ago, The Guardian advised you in an editorial that you should make a categorical statement denouncing rumours of your third term agenda. “Here is a case”, it said in its editorial of April 1, 2004, “where silence is not golden.” For whatever reason, you ignored the newspaper’s advice. Which was just as well. Because if you had not, and swore to it on a stack of the Holy Bible, few Nigerians would still have believed you because your denials would have been at great odds with the facts on the ground even then.

    Among those facts was your apparent determination to subvert the internal democracy of your party, the ruling Peoples’ Democratic Party, by recreating it in your own imperial image. There was also your wilful interference in the choice of the leadership of the National Assembly from the word go. Again, there was, of course, your implacable hostility towards your deputy’s well-known wish to succeed you in 2007 and your none-too-subtle denigration of anyone, notably Generals Ibrahim Babangida and Muhammadu Buhari, who showed the slightest interest in your job.

    Sir, your recent hints that only you can save Nigeria from anarchy has an antecedent. Remember you dropped a similar hint in late 2002 at the height of the threats by the House of Representatives, under the leadership of Alhaji Umar Ghali Na’Abba, to impeach you. That hint prompted the Nigerian Tribune to write an editorial titled THE ALARM ON CIVIL WAR in its edition of September 24, 2002. In that editorial it said your alarm, more likely than not, “could very well be the hollow desperate cry to those base sentiments by a man who has leaned too heavily upon his own counselling and understanding in bungling a golden opportunity”.

    Your Excellency, on May 29, 1999, Nigerians gave you a platinum opportunity, if there is such an expression, to write your name in platinum in Nigeria’s history book. I am afraid, sir, you truly bungled and squandered that opportunity and this was essentially because you allowed vengeance – vengeance against all those you believed had wronged you by wanting to hang you for treason – to become the main driving force in formulating your policies and programmes.

    Sir, you betrayed this motive by the fact that you had barely settled down in your seat as president when you set up the Human Rights Violations Investigations Commission (HRVIC), a.k.a. Oputa Panel, initially to look into human rights violations between 1993, the year you were sentenced to the gallows, and May 1999, the year you emerged from death’s shadow to become Nigeria’s second elected president. It was only after the general uproar about the Oputa Panel’s narrow focus that you extended its period of coverage to include your years in office as military leader.

    Compare your haste, sir, to the well-measured steps South Africa’s Nelson Mandela, took to set up his own Truth and Reconciliation Commission. As you know very well Mandela had more cause to seek vengeance than yourself. After all, he spent 27 years in prison compared to your own five. And the prison conditions there were probably more appalling than ours, given the racist nature of the regime that locked him up.

    At the time the Oputa Panel started sitting late 2001, you may have read a letter written to you by Malam Abubakar Gimba, author and one-time President of the Association of Nigerian Authors. The letter was published in the Daily Trust of August 27, 2001. It is one of the most inspiring pieces of literature I have read in a long time and I wish I had space to reproduce it for you.

    Sir, if you read that letter at all, it is obvious that you did not heed its wise counsel. In that letter, Gimba quoted profusely from the Holy Bible to try and persuade you, as a self-proclaimed born-again Christian, to learn to forgive any past wrongs done to you and focus on reconciliation. “The Holy Bible,” Gimba said among other things, “fully endorses reconciliation when it says (Corinthians 5:19) ‘that God (the Most High) was in Christ (may Allah’s peace be on him) reconciling the world to Himself, not imputing their trespasses to them and has committed to us the word reconciliation’ “ (emphasis, author’s). Gimba said only the tonic of forgiveness will bring about the needed reconciliation in the land and only you could start the process by injecting the antidote.

    He concluded his letter by quoting, again from the Holy Bible, the parable of the rejected cornerstone. You were, he said, destined by God to lead our national reconciliation. “Think about it,” he said. “In particular (think about) Psalm 118:22 ‘The stone which the builders rejected has become the chief cornerstone’.

    “Your Excellency, Mr. President” Gimba finally said, “you were once rejected. Then the Lord restored you to His Grace. Now you are our chief cornerstone. You must do the Lord’s will.”

    Sir, instead of doing the Lord’s will, you chose to do your own will. You chose to avenge those you believed had wronged you either directly, by sending you to the gallows, or indirectly by not raising a finger to protest your ill-treatment. This vengefulness has been apparent from, among other things, the way you have formulated your annual budgets since 1999 and even more so from the highly selective manner you have implemented those budgets to reward groups and sections of the country in your good books and punish those you dislike.

    The vengefulness is also obvious from the way you have tried to divide and rule Nigerians by a most cynical manipulation of ethnicity and religion, mainly through thinly disguised sponsorships of sectional and sectarian associations, even as you yourself condemned such associations as reactionary and divisive.

    Sir, your vengefulness coupled with your apparent belief that you alone know best what is good for Nigeria is what has led the country into its current serious political crisis, a crisis that may lead to anarchy and even into a civil war if we are not careful. Already, there are ominous dark clouds hanging over the country, dark clouds created by your administration’s use of the security forces to harass and intimidate opposition elements pursuing their legitimate rights of free speech, free association and lawful assembly.

    These harassments and intimidation are camouflaged as the need to maintain law and order. The hypocrisy of it all, however, is laid bare by the fact that last week as your administration was prosecuting some members of the Atiku Vanguard for forming, managing and supporting what it called an illegal organisation working for the Vice-President, you yourself were busy setting up the Obasanjo Solidarity Forum.

    Sir, the only way to avoid the manifest danger facing the country is for you to sincerely and unequivocally denounce your third term agenda. Most Nigerian’s would probably not believe you even if you do but you can still convince them if your own actions and those of your henchmen begin to speak louder than your words.

    You know, or at least should know, very well that many of those now telling you that you are indispensable – the Colonel Ahmadu Alis with their crude and silly metarphours about not changing clothes when they are not dirty, the Navy Captain Olabode Georges of this world with their equally crude and silly metarphours of not changing pilots when the aircraft is yet to reach cruising level – all these characters said the same thing to leaders like military president General Ibrahim Babangida, and to your tormentor, General Sani Abacha. You can bet your last kobo they will say the same thing to whoever succeeds you.

    They say the time to quit is when the ovation is loudest. Regardless of what your courtiers tell you, right now probably more Nigerians are jeering your administration than cheering it. The fact is that in spite of your brave attempts at political and economic reforms there is more insecurity, sorrow and misery in the land than when you first returned. Your administration may peddle statistics of your achievements, but in the end it is the human effect that matters.

    The fact is that in spite of your brave effort, you have woefully failed to stop, much less reverse, the rot in our infrastructure like electricity, refineries, higher education and health. One area you seem to have achieved something was telecommunication, with the establishment of mobile phones. Even here the achievement is marred by the inefficiency of the system and its outrageous cost to the consumer, not to mention the terrible and scandalous mess which Pentascope made of Nitel, the nation’s fixed line carrier.

    In the light of all these signal failures it is tempting for you to want to extend your tenure. Sir, you must resist that temptation with every ounce of your strength. Mr. President, Sir, no one, and absolutely no one, is indispensable to his country or cause. As you know very well, the graveyard is full with bodies of many who thought or believed they were indispensable. You owe yourself and Nigeria not to be counted among those who suffered such grand delusions about themselves. If you persist you will only be leading Nigeria down the road to anarchy. At the end of it all, you would then have gone down in Nigeria’s history as its arch-villain instead of one of its heroes.

    May God Almighty give you the strength to avoid such a tragic end to a once glorious career.

  • Setbacks cast  doubt on Jonathan’s political survival

    Setbacks cast doubt on Jonathan’s political survival

    Can President Goodluck Jonathan wriggle out of the quagmire he has been boxed into by the opposition? The rope seems to have been tightly fixed on his neck with the series of unprecedented setbacks, reports AFP.

    President Goodluck Jonathan is facing an uphill battle if he seeks re-election next year, after a series of unprecedented setbacks that have raised doubts about his political survival.

    The perceived damage to the 56-year-old’s stock has led to questions about whether he can bounce back and whether his Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) could be heading for its first national electoral defeat.

    Last month, Nigeria’s former head of state Olusegun Obasanjo accused Mr Jonathan in a critical, 18-page open letter of failing to tackle widespread corruption and piracy as well as kidnapping and rampant oil theft.

    He even claimed that Mr Jonathan was training a private militia to silence critics on a political “hit list”.

    The dust had hardly settled on the resulting row when the PDP lost its parliamentary majority, as 37 lawmakers in the lower House of Representatives joined the All Progressives Congress (APC).

    Some PDP members of the upper house Senate are now expected to follow suit, handing a further potential advantage to the main opposition, just as parties gear up to hit the campaign trail.

    “I think he (Mr Jonathan) is a very weakened president at the moment,” said political analyst Clement Nwankwo, director of the Policy and Legal Advocacy Centre, in the capital Abuja.

    “He’s been a failure and he really has to do a lot to win back popular support,” Mr Nwankwo told AFP.

    Political commentator Dapo Thomas suggested that with the PDP riven with in-fighting, it was now make or break time for Mr Jonathan.

    “He has to choose between the service of the party and the realisation of the damage of his own political ambition,” said Mr Thomas, from Lagos State University.

    “He has to drop one and allow the party mechanism to operate freely.” Mr Jonathan, a Christian from southern Bayelsa state, stepped up from vice-president to become acting head of state in February 2010 when Umaru Yar’Adua fell ill.

    He took over the top job after Yar’Adua’s death, going on to secure a popular mandate in the 2011 presidential elections.

    Mr Jonathan has yet to announce whether he will run for re-election in 2015.

    But he has been accused of ignoring an unwritten PDP rule that presidential candidates rotate between Nigeria’s mainly Muslim north and the Christian majority south.

    That issue is seen as a contributory factor to the defection of five high-profile state governors to the APC in November, which in turn prompted lawmakers to cross the floor.

    He is also widely seen as having failed to address major concerns about graft, inadequate development and poor infrastructure, and to end the bloody Islamist insurgency in northern Nigeria.

    The president vaunted his government’s achievements of sustained economic growth and job creation in his New Year’s message while the PDP denied it was irretrievably damaged.

    The recent defections were an example of democracy in action, said national publicity secretary Olisah Metuh, even as the APC hailed the apparent shift in the balance of power as a new dawn for Africa’s most populous nation.

    “We have seen movement on one side maybe in the last quarter of last year,” he added.

    “Let’s wait until April. Maybe the PDP will be larger that it was before.

    “In 2014, we are predicting that the PDP will be larger than it was before. Don’t forget that the PDP got the people elected. It’s a party that Nigerians love.” Mr Nwankwo acknowledged the opposition’s hand had been strengthened but said the defections were still no guarantee of electoral success and presidential power could yet help swing support back to the PDP.

    Nevertheless, he suggested the problems may have reached such a point that recovery was impossible, forcing Mr Jonathan to make way for another candidate.

    Mr Thomas said the longer the president failed to tackle the issue, the more damage it would do to the PDP.

    Mr Jonathan needed to rule out standing again as soon as possible and remove the party chairman Bamanga Tukur, who is seen as having been parachuted in as the president’s man, he added.

    “It’s better that he does it now so he can save the party,” said Mr Thomas, who lectures in international relations and history.

    “I don’t see the party’s fortunes improving. I see continuous decline of the party because the defections are going to continue to be on the increase for as long as this disenchantment persists.”