Tag: Onnoghen

  • Onnoghen: Appeal Court ruling vindicates Buhari, says APC

    The All Progressives Congress (APC) has said that the decision of the Court of Appeal to okay the trial of suspended Chief Justice of Nigeria, Justice Walter Onnoghen, by the Code of Conduct Tribunal has vindicated his suspension from office by President Muhammadu Buhari.

    National Publicity Secretary of the party, Mallam Lanre Issa-Onilu said in a statement on Thursday that the Appeal Court has further advertised true credentials of the President through its ruling.

    Recall that when the President, acting on the directive of the Code of Conduct Tribunal (CCT) announced the suspension of Onnoghen, some opposition parties wrongly alleged an illegal action by the President and viewed the CCT as lacking jurisdiction.

    But the Court of Appeal had in a unanimous decision read by Justice Abdul Aboki dismissed the request brought by Onnoghen asking for a stay of proceedings in his asset declaration trial at the CCT ostensibly clearing any doubt about the competence of the CCT and the procedure that led to the suspension.

    Onilu said: “The APC had in the wake of the suspension insisted that the rule of law be upheld and allowed to thrive while Justice Onnoghen submits himself to the law.

    “The Appeal court ruling has further advertised the credentials of President Buhari as an unrepentant believer in the rule of law, due process and justice. Contrary to claims by the opposition and a section of the Nigerian Bar Association that the suspended CJN is a victim of persecution and that the law is not being followed in his arraignment.

    Read Also: Onnoghen: Court activities resume in Osun

    “The Appeal Court has now confirmed that Onnoghen’s trial at the CCT is indeed within the confines of the law. His suspension is therefore not prejudiced as being painted in some quarters since it was based on an order lawfully issued by the CCT.

    “The suspended CJN had adjudicated on many cases where he ruled that only the CCT is exclusively empowered to entertain cases on asset declaration. It may be tempting for a weak and self-serving leader to ignore these legal precedents, but not President Buhari. He is ever truthful, fearless, fair and just and a stickler to rules.
    “The APC is calling on the opposition to subject their criticisms to constitutional tests before polluting the public space with remarks, largely a product of political experience capable of bringing an incorruptible President to opprobrium. Issues of law cannot thrive where emotions and sentiment are the driving force.

  • Onnoghen: Court activities resume in Osun

    Activities at the Osun State High Court on Thursday returned to normal position after a 2-day protest by members of the Nigerian Bar Association, Osun Chapter, against the suspension of the Chief Justice of Nigeria, Justice Walter Onnoghen.

    The News Agency of Nigeria reports that judiciary workers and other prison officials with prosecutors were seen among others entering the court premises as at 8:30 a.m with gates widely opened.

    Magistrate courts have also commenced sitting as at 9:00 a.m with Judges of the State High Court seen going to their respective court rooms for the commencement of sitting.

    NAN further reports that lawyers and their clients were also seen entering court rooms to attend to their respective cases, while court clerks remained seated at their positions.

    Read Also: Onnoghen: Osinbajo, NBA ponder six-point resolution

    A legal practitioner who spoke with NAN, Mr Adebola Dare, expressed happiness for the resumption but called on the Federal Government and the Judiciary to handle the Onnoghen Asset declaration issues with wisdom.

    Dare noted that the judiciary must be independent without any interference from any arm of government, except otherwise where the executive needed to play its part.

    He, therefore, urged parties in the suit against the CJN to ensure that due process was followed in order not to heat up the polity which had already generated global concern.

    Onnoghen’s asset declaration issues and the attendant legal implication resulted to the NBA, at the National level, going on a 2-day protest against his suspension by the President, Muhammadu Buhari.

  • Between Saraki and Onnoghen

    Between Senate President Bukola Saraki and damaged Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN) Walter Onneghen, there are ample running parallels.  It is little surprise, therefore, that Saraki, clutching a suspect mandate, is rushing to the Supreme Court, on a suspect mission.

    Everyone knows how Saraki sold off his former party, the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC), to corral the Senate presidency.  Everyone also saw how his brazen desperation led him to trade off the Deputy Senate Presidency (the majority party’s right by common sense, convention and law) to the opposition Peoples Democratic Party (PDP).  It was a riveting study in concentrated perfidy.

    Even after all those had crashed, in his failed bid to lure APC members back to PDP, to willy-nilly maintain his Senate presidency, he had grimly held on to the chaff of office, as a minority senator, when everyone knows the grain left him when he defected without quitting his office.

    Therefore, a delusion-powered desperation must have galvanized him to issue a personally signed statement, joining the technicality assembly on the Onnoghen question.  Bristling with that delusion, he promptly summoned an emergency Senate plenary, to try and grandstand and rail-road the Senate into his latest Onnoghen gambit.

    But reality must have dawned when Saraki suddenly realised he could be playing the Yoruba “sigidi” (mud sculpture) thirsting for a splash in the stream.  Or in popular Igbo-led lingo, of the volatile Senate presidency of the Olusegun Obasanjo era – that he might just be gliding towards the proverbial “banana peel” that could smash his humpty-dumpty!

    So, Omo Baba Oloye beat a sudden retreat, and headed for the Supreme Court, for an interpretation of the law.  No big deal about that, in normal circumstances.  But could Saraki, in all good conscience, do that without a plenary resolution, committing the Senate to it?

    Okay, even if you want to play in the realm of “delegated legislation” (broadly speaking), can a minority senator, desperately hanging on as “Senate President” commit the entire house to minority, if not Saraki’s personal, whims?

    But of course!  Riggers of the system don’t really bother themselves with such careful introspection.  Armed with cynical philosophy that evil would always trump evil, they just rush to do the maximum damage.

    But now to Onnoghen, who would, from the way he has played the unfolding Judiciary’s greatest scandal, appear Saraki’s judicial parallel.

    Assets the CJN appears not able to explain, he claims he “forgot” – and put in the realm of “mistake”.  But he knows that is pathetic and patently silly defence, at least going by the forensic reasoning of his sacred profession.

    A person with honour would have quit.  Even if he doesn’t care about his personal prestige, the Judiciary’s institutional honour should have swayed him.  But no!  Sit tight is the game.  Procedural angling is the strategy.  But sure disgrace and defeat is the result.

  • Breaking: Onnoghen at CCT: Appeal Court refuses to stay proceedings

    The Court of Appeal in Abuja has rejected the request by suspended Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN), Justice Walter Onnoghen to stay proceedings in the charge pending against him before the Code of Conduct Tribunal (CCT).

    A three-man panel, led by Justice Abdul Aboki, in a ruling a moment ago, dismissed the application Onnoghen filed to that effect.

    Read Also: Falana urges NJC to ask Onnoghen to step aside

    The court said, in view of the provision of Section 306 of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act (ACJA), it lacked the power to stay proceedings in criminal cases.

    By the ruling, the CCT is now free to resume proceedings in the charge before it.

     

    Details shortly….

  • Boycott directive stalls Onnoghen’s case in Industrial Court

    The directive by Nigerian Bar Association ( NBA ), calling on its members to boycott the courts for two days stalled the hearing of a suit challenging the trial of Justice Walter Onnoghen.

    Onnoghen was the former Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN).

    The suit which is challenging the jurisdiction of the Code of Conduct Tribunal (CCT) was slated for hearing on Wednesday in the National Industrial Court, Abuja.

    The court had on Jan. 14 granted an interim order brought via a motion exparte application against the Tribunal by Peter Abang, lawyer and concerned Nigerian.

    At the resumed hearing of the substantive suit, the judge, Justice Sanusi Kado informed the defendant counsel, Abdullahi Abubakar representing the Attorney-General of the Federation that there was a letter from the claimant’s counsel before the court.

    Kado also said the letter from the counsel, James Igwe (SAN), asked for a new date, adding that his absence was due to NBA’s directive to lawyers to boycott courts in protest of Onnoghen’s suspension.

    The judge thereafter adjourned the matter until Feb. 7 and directed that hearing notices should be served on all parties.

    Read Also: I participated in NJC meeting, says NBA President

    NBA reached a resolution to boycott courts nationwide from Tuesday Jan. 29 and Wednesday Jan. 30, after its National Executive Committee (NEC) meeting on Monday in Abuja.

    The NBA President, Mr Paul Usoro, who made the announcement, said lawyers reached the agreement to express their displeasure over the suspension of the CJN.

    Onnoghen was suspended by President Muhammadu Buhari on Jan. 25, over failure to declare his assets as required of every public servant by law.

    The president said he acted on a motion exparte order granted by the CCT, replacing Onnoghen with Justice Tanko Mohammed as acting CJN.

    Joined as co-defendants in the suit are Code of Court Bureau (CCB), CCT chairman, Danladi Umar, Office of the Attorney-General of the Federation and The National Judicial Service Commission (NJC), and the National Judicial Council

    Others are The Federal Judicial Service Commission, the Inspector-General of Police, Minister of Justice Minister, Abubakar Malami, and the Senate President, Bukola Saraki.

  • Ohaneze youths back Buhari over suspension of CJN

    The president general of Ohanaeze Youth Council(OYC), Okechukwu Isiguzoro on Wednesday called on Nigerians to join hands with the present government led by President Muhammadu Buhari in eliminating corruption in the nation.

    Mazi Isiguzoro further backed the federal government over the recent suspension of Chief Justice of Nigeria, Justice, Walter Onnogben.

    The youth leader who made this known in Abakaliki described corruption as a cankerworm which has eaten deeply into every sector of the nation.

    Mr Isiguzoro further condemned the stand of some international communities, groups, individuals including the Nigeria Bar Association, NBA, over the matter.

    He insisted that public office holders in Nigeria as it were in developed and developing countries should abide by the Constitution of Nigeria which they swore to protect and not the opposite.

    He gave instance of America, United Kingdom and other developed countries where public office holders on mere accusation would tender their resignation letter immediately before facing trial.

    “But in Nigeria, the same countries we are learning good governance from will be the first to kick, they will like us to do the opposite, why?

    “Fighting corruption as demonstrated by the present federal government should be welcome by all Nigerians irrespective of the political inclination, tribe, interest, religion or region.

    “Noone should be made a scapegoat not minding his place in government. I know that fighting corruption is not what the federal government will achieve in a day but we must start somewhere.

    “So those that are kicking against it have forgotten in a hurry that the same Justice Onnogben had in his career in the jury convicted suspects with similar matter. Nigeria is bigger than one individual, profession or belief.

    “Think about it; how would you feel if you or your brother nor relations happened to be among those suspects Justice Walter Onnoghen have convicted and sentenced on criminal offences in his career in the court and today under similar crime he is set free”.

    “I’m appealing to Nigerians irrespective of their individual interest to allow Justice Walter Onnoghen face his trial, if he is found guilty good for him, if he’s not good for him too.

    “The same thing to the Nigeria Bar Association, they should allow the law to take its due course”, he explained.

    He called on President Buhari to be just in the trial of Justice Onnoghen, but noted that it is a Constitutional obligation for every public office holder in Nigeria to declare his asset.

    Mr Isigusoro assured Ndigbo and Nigerians in general that Ohanaeze youth council would continue to remain just on national issues.

  • Falana urges NJC to ask Onnoghen to step aside

    Rights activist Femi Falana (SAN) has urged the National Judicial Council (NJC) to compel the suspended Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN), Justice Walter Onnoghen, to step aside pending the determination of the case against him.

    Falana said his position was informed by NJC’s precedent, in which it, few years back, directed judges arrested by security agents and charged to court, to excuse themselves from judicial duties until their cases were concluded.

    He accused the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) of engaging in double standard by taking a position to oppose Justice Onnoghen’s suspension.

    Falana argued that it was wrong for the NBA which called for the suspension of judges arrested by security agents in 2016 to insist that a CJN, against who a charge is pending, should remain in office.

    Falana, who was at the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) to attend to a case in defiance of the NBA’s directive that lawyers boycott court, said the directive was ignored by many lawyers, who turned up in court.

    He said, while he faulted the Executive’s decision to suspend the CJN on an ex-parte order issued by the Code of Conduct Tribunal (CCT), he argued that Onnoghen should resign.

    Falana said: “I have a case before court number 26 in the FCT High Court, Abuja. I left Lagos yesterday to handle my case. My clients are around. I have a contract with my client, which supersedes the directive of the NBA.

    “I thought the court would sit. But, unfortunately, we were told the judge is involved in a seminar in preparation for the sittings of the election tribunals, which, for me, is a good excuse for not siting.

    “But, on a very serious note, I am not bound by the resolution of the NBA. I have consistently maintained my position in this self-inflicted crisis that we are going through.

    “I have condemned the suspension of the Chief Justice of Nigeria on the basis of an ex-parte order of the Code of Conduct Tribunal. And, at the same time, I have also asked that the suspension be lifted.

    “I have also pleaded with the Chief Justice to do the needful by resigning from office. And I think there is still an opportunity to do what is needed to be done.”

    On why he chose to attend court on a day the NBA directed lawyers to shun courts, Falana argued that with the position he had maintained on the issue, he could not persuade himself “to engage in solidarity with criminality.

    “The National Judicial Council (NJC) should have met on the 15th of January, last week’s Tuesday, and that body would have had the opportunity to save the legal profession and the country this colossal embarrassment.

    “But the Chief Justice, as Chairman of the NJC, in his wisdom, decide unilaterally to postpone the meeting of the NJC indefinitely.

    “So, I am happy that some concerned members of the NJC requisitioned for a meeting of the body and the body is meeting today. And we are hoping that, regardless of the boycott of the NBA, that body will follow its own precedents by asking the honourable Chief Justice to step aside.

    “In 2016, when a number of judges were arrested and charged before the Federal High Court, the NJC rightly decided that those judges be interdicted on the advice of the NBA, and they were so interdicted.

    “This time around, the NBA is busy, mobilising lawyers to defend the Chief Justice. And the picture that I have seen in court,a very sad picture, reminds me of the trial of Mandela. The impression is being given that a freedom fighter is on trial. But, we all know that that is not the case here.

    “We shouldn’t have pushed ourselves to this embarrassing level that the Chief Justice of our country is on trial. You would have expected the NBA leaders to give the appropriate advise in this case.”

    When asked his assessment of the level of lawyers’ compliance with the NBA’s directive, Falana said: “You can see that many lawyers are here in court in defiance of the NBA resolution, because it is not a popular resolution.

    “From information at my disposal, lawyers have turned up in court all over the country to have their cases heard.”

    On whether those who complied were being misled, Falana said: “I will not say that. Everybody has his own freedom. This is a country of freedom. So, those who want to sit at home are entitled to their decision. Those of us in court are also entitled to do so.

    This place (the court premises) could not have been deserted because the NBA has adopted a resolution, which, from what you have seen, is not popular with its members.

    “In the interest of the legal profession, we must operate under the rule of law. And that is what has informed my criticism of the position of the Federal Government,” Falana said.

     

  • Onnoghen: Discordant tunes persist as NJC sits

    Lawyers were supposed to boycott courts yesterday to protest President Muhammadu Buhari’s suspension of Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN) Walter Onnoghen, but not a few ignored it.

    Activities in all the courts in Rivers State were crippled as ordered by the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA).

    The courts were opened, with the registrars present, but the judges were not there. A few lawyers were seen in the courts.

    Speaking to reporters, Rivers NBA chairman Sylvester Adaka said even if there were issues of corruption linked to the CJN, the President should follow due process in handling it.

    “It is not that NBA is encouraging corruption in any way, all we are saying is that there is a process which must be followed,” he said.

    A former Attorney-General of Rivers State and a Senior Advocate of Nigerian, Barinua Wifa, described the CJN’s suspension as a trial of the nation’s democracy.

    The legal luminary, who spoke in Port Harcourt, yesterday, said the decision was hasty and did not follow the constitution of the nation.

    Wifa added that ‘Buhari does not have the constitutional backing to appoint or remove a judicial official without recommendations from the National Judicial Council, adding that the president acted contrary to the law.

    Akwa Ibom

    Lawyers in Akwa Ibom yesterday boycotted the courts. Our correspondent, who went round courts in Uyo metropolis, observed that administrative workers were hanging around the premises of the courts.

    Some lawyers, who came in the morning, were seen standing in groups apparently discussing the development but refused to speak to the reporters.

    A one-time State Chairman of the NBA, Ekanem Ekanem, said lawyers in the state completely complied with the directive.

    Ekanem said the NBA set up a team to monitor activities of lawyers during the two-day protest.

    He said: “Akwa Ibom State chapter of NBA swiftly swung into action on Monday and set up a monitoring team to monitor the activities of lawyers attending court sittings for possible sanctions.

    “No lawyer went to court today (Tuesday) as am talking to you I have three cases in court but I have not attended to any of them.

    “The warning strike ends tomorrow but if the federal government does not rescind its decision to suspend the Chief Justice Walter Onnonghen and also rescind its decision to appoint Justice Tanko Muhammad as the Acting ChiefJustice of Nigeria, the NBA will explore other stringent measures to ensure Federal Government complies.”

     Calabar

    Lawyers in Cross River State took the streets of Calabar to protest the suspension of Justice Onnoghen.

    The placard-bearing lawyers from the three NBA branches in the state comprising Calabar, Ikom and Ogoja, converged on the state judiciary headquarters at High Court complex on Mary Slessor Avenue before proceeding to the governor’s office on Diamond Hill to present a six-point demand to the governor for onward transmission to the president.

    The Vice Chairman of NBA, Calabar Branch, Julius Idiege, read the communiqué before it was presented to Deputy Governor Ivara Esu, who received it on behalf of Governor Ben Ayade.

    The communiqué issued by the lawyers reads: “We condemn in the strongest terms, and wholly reject the unconstitutional suspension of Honourable Justice Walter Samuel Nkanu Onnoghen by President Muhammadu Buhari, vide a black market ex parte order issued by the Code of Conduct Tribunal.

    “We are horrified that the Hon Justice Tanko Mohammed submitted himself to be sworn in as Acting Chief Justice of Nigeria, thereby subscribing to this abuse of the constitution and we find the actions of the Code of Conduct Tribunal perfidious and fraudulent.”

    “Unless this abuse of the constitution is redressed immediately, the rule of law will be in jeopardy and this will drive the country towards anarchy. The constitution of Nigeria must remain supreme and sacrosanct. We call on the president to immediately retrace his steps and reinstate Hon. Justice Walter Onnoghen to his position as Justice of Nigeria, and preserve the constitution which he swore to uphold.”

    They urged the National Executive Committee of the NBA to take all necessary steps in defence of the constitution and the rule of law.

    Meanwhile, courts in the state were boycotted by lawyers throughout Tuesday. The boycott will continue on Wednesday as directed by the NBA at the national level.

    National Industrial Court, Abuja

     Lawyers shunned the Industrial Court Complex in Garki, but two of the four courts had their usual court proceedings, while one delivered a ruling.

    The court registrar of one of the courts that did not sit said it was because sitting was not slated in his court for Tuesday.

    A NAN correspondent was also informed that the judge in another court that did not sit was on vacation.

    The lawyers were seen in the premises going into the registry to file processes while others were in courtrooms involving in court proceedings.

    One of them, who preferred anonymity told NAN that he came to get a new date for his matter slated for today, but met his colleagues waiting for proceedings and he joined them.

    Another lawyer, Mr Steve Imokhe said he was in court as a defence counsel for a matter slated for today, he said NBA should have gone round the courts to ensure compliance rather than giving a directive without monitoring it.

     Jigawa/Kano NBA chapter defy court boycott order

     The Jigawa branch of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) defied the order of its national body.

    The association, in a statement by its chairman, Mr Bashir Hussaini, said the state chapter would not participate in the nationwide court boycott.

    “The NBA, Dutse branch, expresses its deep concern over the suspension of Chief Justice of Nigeria.

    “However, the branch will not embark on any strike or boycott of our proceeding,” it said.

    The association described the suspension as “trying time” for the legal profession, and called on the parties to seek redress through legal means.

    “The situation is a trying time for the legal profession.

    “The parties should seek redress through legal means by appealing against the order of the tribunal for the suspension of the CJN, instead of boycotting courts that will be detrimental to the parties,” it advised.

    The Kano State branch of the NBA also did not comply with its national body’s order to boycott courts.

    The branch made its position known in a statement by its Secretary, Malam Mujtaba Ameen, in Kano.

    “We at Kano NBA Branch have decided that we will not ask any member of our branch to boycott courts for two days.

    “We should be responsible enough to do the best for our country, Nigeria, families, clients and the system as a whole,’’ he said.

    “We should endeavor to preserve the nobleness of our highly respected profession by being fair to the society and our children yet unborn,’’ Ameen said.

    A correspondent of the News Agency of Nigeria (NAN), who visited some Magistrates’ and Federal High Courts in Kano, said most of the judges reported for duties and entertained cases.

    Partial compliance at FHC Abuja

     The order was partially complied with at the Federal High Court, Abuja.

    Court 3 at the Federal High Court sat and was filled with lawyers.

    When some cases were called, there were no legal representations and no reason given for the absence of counsel.

    One of the lawyers, Hadiza Sani, who spoke to NAN, said that she was not aware of the order to boycott courts.

    Another lawyer who spoke on condition of anonymity, said that boycotting the courts, particularly on Jan. 29 would not be fair to his client, who had been in detention and had the opportunity to have his bail application heard.

    Mr F.A. Aba, also a lawyer, told NAN that he was in court only to take fresh dates for his cases and to tell his clients that the case had been adjourned.

     

    Strike stalls activities

    at FCT High Court, Apo

     

    Activities were stalled at FCT High Court, Apo, as lawyers complied with directive.

    A NAN correspondent, who visited the Apo High Court complex, said all the courts did not proceed with cases slated for the day.

    Lawyers, who came to court, said they were around to get new dates.

     

    Lawyers ignore NBA in Lagos

     

    The boycott recorded partial success in Ikeja High Court as very few lawyers came to court for hearings.

    Also many judges at the Ikeja High Court adjudicated over cases.

    However, a task force of the NBA disrupted proceedings in some of the courts, thereby forcing them to adjourn.

    The task force, for instance, told lawyers in Justice Iyabo Kasali’s courtroom to comply with the boycott directive.

    All the lawyers left the courtroom to prevent confrontation.

    Proceedings in Justice Raliatu Adebiyi’s courtroom were disrupted at 10.50 a.m. by the NBA task force as they directed lawyers present to comply with the boycott order

    The disruption made the judge to rise and adjourn proceedings.

    But the situation was a bit different at the Special Offences Courts at Justice Rosaline Omotoso Court House.

    Judges in the four courtrooms adjudicated over some cases.

    Justice Mojisola Dada commenced sitting at about 9.00 a.m. and rose at 10.30a.m., Justice Oluwatoyin Taiwo and Justice Olusola Williams also sat over some cases in their courts.

    In Justice Sherifat Solebo’s courtroom, lawyers and litigants were seated awaiting the judge’s arrival.

    A judicial worker who pleaded anonymity told journalists that some of the courts rose early because many lawyers were absent.

    “I support NBA in the call for the boycott because it has to do with constitution.

    “If Justice Onnoghen has committed any crime, let due process be followed in removing him.

    At the Domestic Violence and Sexual Offences Court , Justice Abiola Soladoye began sitting at 9.00a.m. and was still adjudicating matters as at noon.

    In Justice Sybil Nwaka’s courtroom, lawyers and litigants were awaiting her arrival.

    Many lawyers entered appearance at the Lagos and Ikorodu Divisions of the Lagos State High Court yesterday, despite a Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) directive asking them to boycott the courts for two days.

    Many of the judges also reported for duty and entertained cases.

    A lawyer, who appeared before Justice Modupe Nicol-Clay at the Igbosere High Court, Michael Oyagha, explained why he shunned the order.

    Oyagha said: “The NBA directive is in order, however, some of us are not in agreement with it. The reason is that what we expected the NBA to do was not the first thing it did. In my opinion, the first thing the NBA should have done was to go to court and challenge the ex parte order made by the Code of Conduct Tribunal. Rather it asked lawyers to boycott the courts for two days when there are matters scheduled for today.

    “There are defendants that would have been sent to prison if their lawyers hadn’t come to court today. This morning, for instance, a defendant was discharged. Assuming his lawyer didn’t show up today, he would have been sent back to prison.”

    Another lawyer, who shunned the directive at the Ikorodu Division, said he had no choice.

    Speaking on condition of anonymity, he’s said: “My principal assigned this case to me before travelling out of the country. Should I call him to say I would not be in court because the NBA asked us to boycott? I can’t do that, especially when I know he is not in support of the directive.

    “Besides, our NBA Chairman told us to go with our conscience on the matter. If you can afford to join the boycott, fine. If not, fine.”

    However, not all the high courts sat.

    The Court of Appeal on Lagos Island was one of them. It will not sit until next Monday, but not because of the NBA directive.

    The Nation learnt that this week has been designated as a conference week.

    At the Igbosere and Tinubu Magistrates’ Court on Lagos Island and the Yaba Magistrates’ Court on Lagos Mainland, there was no compliance with the boycott.

    But there appeared to be some compliance at the Badagry Division of the court.

    A member of the Badagry branch of the NBA, Chief Gerald Okorie said the branch was in full support of the directive.

    Okorie, who spoke to The Nation at the Tinubu Magistrates’ Court, said he and three of his colleagues, were there to monitor compliance with the boycott.

    He noted, however, that not every lawyer complied.

    Okorie said: “As far as the Nigerian Bar Association has taken a decision, we are bound by it as members of the association, and we are interested in following this matter up because we believe that Onnoghen is not the problem, we are the ones who are in problem. When you destroy the judiciary, you destroy the masses, you destroy the lawyers, you destroy the system, you destroy the government, you destroy even the politicians.”

    A Lagos-based lawyer, Maduka Onwukeme, said although he didn’t decide to join the buycott at the Igbosere High Court, the judge before whom he was to appear did not sit.

    Onwukeme said: “I came but the court wasn’t sitting. Honestly, I don’t think the reason for the buycott is altruistic.  I think it is self-serving. I don’t support the action of the President but I don’t support the CJN, too.

    “But then telling us to buycout the courts over the CJN and the President’s issues, I don’t think is right.”

     

  • NJC to Onnoghen, Ag. CJN: defend yourselves in 7 days

    Lawyers hailed yesterday the action of the National Judicial Council (NJC) on the crisis of integrity rocking the Judiciary.

    The NJC at  its emergency meeting in Abuja issued suspended Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN) Walter Onnoghen and Acting CJN Tanko Muhammad a seven-day deadline to respond to petitions pending against them.

    The petition against Justice Onnoghen relates to the allegation of violation of the code of conduct for public officers in relation to his alleged failure to declare his assets.

    Justice Muhammad is alleged to have engaged in misconduct in allowing himself to be sworn in in a manner that breached  law, tradition and constitutional provisions.

    NJC’s spokesman Soji Oye said in a statement that the council also elected to refer the petition against Code of Conduct (CCT) Chairman Justice Danladi Yakubu Umar to the Federal Judicial Service Commission (FJSC).

    It was learnt that Justice Onnoghen and Justice Muhammad were not at the meeting, which was chaired by retired Court of Appeal President Umaru Abdullahi.

    The case against Umar, The Nation learnt, relates to his alleged abuse of judicial authority or breach of constitutional provisions by the orders he made in the course of proceedings in the charge against the suspended CJN.

    Read also: Presidency uncovers plans to scuttle elections, says NSA

    In one of such orders, the CCT rejected to be bound by High Courts orders directing it to stay proceedings.

    Another is the ex-parte order the CCT made on which President Muhammadu Buhari claimed to have relied in suspended Onnoghen and inaugurating Justice Muhammad in acting capacity.

    It was also learnt that the NJC chose to abridge the usual 14 days response time to seven, in view of the weighty issues involved in the petitions.

    The NJC is to reconvene on February 11.

    “I’m happy with the development. NJC and the Judiciary will work together to strengthen our judicial system,” rights activist and lawyer Monday Ubani said.

    The statement reads: “The National Judicial Council held an Emergency Meeting today and considered four (4) petitions filed at its Secretariat.  The petitions are:

    “Petition against Hon. Mr. Justice W.S.N. Onnoghen, GCON by Zikhrillahi Ibrahim of Resource Centre for Human Rights & Civil Education;

    “Petition against Hon. Mr. Justice Ibrahim Tanko Muhammad, CFR by Centre for Justice and Peace Initiative;

    “Petition against Hon. Mr. Justice Ibrahim Tanko Muhammad, CFR by Olisa Agbakoba, SAN, OON; and

    “Petition against Hon. Danladi Yakubu Umar, Chairman, Code of Conduct Tribunal by Centre for Justice and Peace Initiative.

    “Council referred the petition against Hon. Danladi Yakubu Umar to the Federal Judicial Service Commission (FJSC) which is the appropriate constitutional body empowered to deal with it.

    “In line with its procedure, Council also forwarded the petitions against Hon. Justices W.S.N. Onnoghen, GCON and I. T. Muhammad, CFR to them for their responses.

    “In view of the gravity of the matters involved, Council abridged the usual response period from fourteen (14) to seven (7) working days for the Hon. Justices to respond.

    “Hon. Mr. Justice W. S. N. Onnoghen, GCON and Hon. Mr. Justice I.T. Muhammad, CFR recused themselves from the meeting.  Consequently, Council elected Hon. Mr. Justice Umaru Abdullahi, CON, former President of the Court of Appeal, as Interim Chairman to preside over the meeting.

    “Council will reconvene on the 11th February, 2019.”

  • Updated: NJC queries Onnoghen, Muhammad

    The National Judicial Council (NJC) rose from its emergency meeting a moment ago with a decision to allow suspended Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN) and the acting CJN, Justices Walter Onnoghen and Ibrahim Tanko Muhammad seven days to respond to petitions pending against them.

    The petition against Onnoghen relates to the allegation of violation of the code of conduct for public officers in relation to his alleged failure to declare his assets.

    The petition against Muhammad relates to his alleged misconduct in allowing himself to be sworn-in in manner that breach existing law, tradition and constitutional provisions.

    NJC’s Director, Information Soji Oye, said, in a statement that the council also elected to refer petition against CCT Chairman, Danladi Yakubu Umar to the Federal Judicial Service Commission (FJSC).

    It was learnt that Onnoghen and Muhammad were absent from the meeting, which was eventually chaired by retired Court of Appeal President, Umaru Abdulahi.

    The case against Umar, The Nation learnt, relates to his alleged abuse of judicial authority of breach of constitutional provisions by the orders he made in the course of proceedings in the charge against the suspended CJN.

    One of such orders is where the CCT rejected to be bound by orders given by High Courts, directing it to stay proceedings.

    Another is the ex-parte order the CCT made, on which President Muhammadu Buhari claimed to have relied in suspended Onnoghen and inaugurated Muhammad in acting capacity.

    It was also learnt that the NJC chose to abridge the usual 14 response time to seven, in view of the weighty issues involved in the petitions against Onnoghen and Muhammad.

    NJC adjourned to reconvene on February, 11 this year.

    Read Also; Onnoghen: NJC members in move to save Judiciary

    The statement reads: “The National Judicial Council held an Emergency Meeting today and considered four (4) petitions filed at its Secretariat. The petitions are:

    “Petition against Hon. Mr. Justice W.S.N. Onnoghen, GCON by Zikhrillahi Ibrahim of Resource Centre for Human Rights & Civil Education;

    “Petition against Hon. Mr. Justice Ibrahim Tanko Muhammad, CFR by Centre for Justice and Peace Initiative;

    “Petition against Hon. Mr. Justice Ibrahim Tanko Muhammad, CFR by Olisa Agbakoba, SAN, OON; and

    “Petition against Hon. Danladi Yakubu Umar, Chairman, Code of Conduct Tribunal by Centre for Justice and Peace Initiative.

    “Council referred the petition against Hon. Danladi Yakubu Umar to the Federal Judicial Service Commission (FJSC) which is the appropriate constitutional body empowered to deal with it.

    “In line with its procedure, Council also forwarded the petitions against Hon. Justices W.S.N. Onnoghen, GCON and I. T. Muhammad, CFR to them for their responses.

    “In view of the gravity of the matters involved, Council abridged the usual response period from fourteen (14) to seven (7) working days for the Hon. Justices to respond.

    “Hon. Mr. Justice W. S. N. Onnoghen, GCON and Hon. Mr. Justice I.T. Muhammad, CFR recused themselves from the meeting. Consequently, Council elected Hon. Mr. Justice Umaru Abdullahi, CON, former President of the Court of Appeal as Interim Chairman to preside over the meeting.

    “Council will reconvene on the 11th February, 2019.”