The Nation Newspaper

Tag: Onoh

  • Onoh commends Nigeria Customs’ seizure of 347 snakes, scorpions destined for export

    Onoh commends Nigeria Customs’ seizure of 347 snakes, scorpions destined for export

    The Founder of Woodland Park Zoo Coal city, Enugu and the Chairman of Tenerife Hospitality Group, Dr. Josef Onoh, has commended the Nigeria Customs Service (NCS) for its interception and seizure of 17 live scorpions and 340 snakes at Murtala Mohammed International Airport Lagos.

    In a major breakthrough in the fight against illicit trafficking of endangered species, the NCS recently intercepted the reptiles packaged for export outside Nigeria. 

    The NCS Area Controller, Mike Awe, said that the wildlife export was a breach of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES).

    Reacting to the development, the conservationist, Onoh, said that on behalf of himself and the broader conservation community, they extend commendation to the Nigeria Customs Service for the remarkable seizure, noting that it represents a significant victory in the battle against illegal wildlife trade.

    Onoh said that the illegal trade is a scourge that not only undermines Nigeria’s biodiversity but also tarnishes the nation’s global reputation and threatens the delicate balance of the ecosystems.

    ‎Onoh runs the multi-billion-naira Woodland Park Zoo in the Iva Valley Forest Reserve Enugu, designed to promote wildlife tourism and conservation education while offering a world-class safari experience. The zoological garden houses a diverse array of species, including giraffes, zebras, antelopes, crocodiles, and various snakes.

    Onoh said that the illegal wildlife trade generates a worldwide estimated $7–23 billion annual gross revenue but has a long cast shadow over Nigeria, positioning the nation as a key transit hub for illicit activities involving protected species such as pangolins, elephants, and reptiles like scorpions and snakes as evidenced on the NCS seizure.

    “These activities fuel transnational crime, destabilize economic stability, and endanger public safety by facilitating the spread of zoonotic diseases. 

    “The trafficking of live animals, often conducted without regard for their welfare or ecological impact, contributes to the depletion of Nigeria’s rich biodiversity, with far-reaching consequences for our forests, wildlife, and the livelihoods of communities’ dependent on sustainable ecosystems. The NCS’s proactive intervention in this case sends a powerful message: Nigeria will not tolerate the exploitation of its natural heritage for illicit gain,” Onoh said.

    ‎He added that under the leadership of Comptroller Michael Awe, the Murtala Muhammed Area Command has demonstrated unwavering commitment to enforcing the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES), to which Nigeria has been a signatory since 1974.

    “By intercepting these 17 live scorpions and 340 snakes, the NCS has not only prevented a breach of international conservation standards but also safeguarded species that play critical roles in maintaining ecological balance. Reptiles such as these are vital to controlling pest populations and supporting biodiversity, and their illegal trade risks local extinctions and disrupts the natural harmony of Nigeria’s ecosystems. This seizure underscores the NCS’s pivotal role in disrupting criminal networks that profit from environmental destruction, and I applaud their diligence in ensuring that the seized animals will be handed over to the appropriate authorities for proper care and rehabilitation.”

    ‎He stated that the damage caused by illegal wildlife trade extends beyond environmental loss since Nigeria’s reputation as a hub for trafficking in pangolin scales, ivory, and other wildlife products has, for too long, overshadowed its potential as a leader in conservation and sustainable tourism.

    “The NCS’s consistent efforts, including this interception and previous seizures such as the 1,600 parrots and canaries in July 2025, are reshaping this narrative. By collaborating with organizations like the Wildlife Justice Commission and Focused Conservation, and through initiatives like the Nigeria Special Wildlife Office, the NCS is demonstrating that Nigeria is taking bold steps to reclaim its standing as a responsible steward of its natural resources. These actions align with the National Strategy to Combat Wildlife and Forest Crime (2022–2026), which seeks to dismantle trafficking networks and promote sustainable environmental practices.”

    Onoh said that as a passionate conservationist, advocate for wildlife conservation and founder of the Woodland Park zoo, he was deeply inspired by the NCS’s efforts, which he said resonates with his own commitment to protecting Nigeria’s biodiversity.

    “My ongoing project, the Woodland Park Zoo in Enugu, reflects this dedication. Situated in the Iva Valley Forest Reserve, this multi-billion-naira initiative is designed to promote wildlife tourism and conservation education while offering a world-class safari experience in the heart of Enugu. The zoological garden, already 70 percent complete, will house a diverse array of species, including giraffes, zebras, antelopes, crocodiles, and various snakes, all cared for in environments that prioritize their welfare and align with global conservation standards. By showcasing Nigeria’s natural heritage, Woodland Park aims to foster appreciation for our wildlife, create jobs, and position Enugu as a premier destination for eco-tourism.

    Read Also: Obasanjo a colossus, living legend, says Onoh

    “The Woodland Park Zoo is more than a tourism venture; it is a testament to the belief that conservation and economic development can coexist. By investing in sustainable projects like this, we can counter the destructive impact of illegal wildlife trade, which robs future generations of the opportunity to experience Nigeria’s rich biodiversity. The NCS’s recent actions reinforce the importance of such initiatives, proving that law enforcement and conservation efforts can work hand in hand to protect our environment and elevate Nigeria’s global image.

    ‎”I commend the NCS for their tireless work in combating wildlife trafficking, which not only protects endangered species but also strengthens Nigeria’s position as a leader in the fight against environmental crime. I urge the service to continue its collaboration with domestic and international partners, including the National Environmental Standards and Regulations Enforcement Agency (NESREA) and the Wildlife Law Enforcement Task Force, to ensure that seized wildlife is managed responsibly and that traffickers face the full weight of the law. Together, we can build a Nigeria where our ecosystems thrive, our wildlife is protected, and our nation is celebrated for its commitment to conservation.

    “Ones again, I salute the Nigeria Customs Service for their exemplary service and dedication to safeguarding our natural heritage. Your actions inspire us all to do more in the fight for a sustainable future.”

  • The unjustified attacks on Onoh’s defence of Tinubu

    The unjustified attacks on Onoh’s defence of Tinubu

    • By Adolphus Ude

    A lot of sentiments have been expressed by some individuals particularly, of persons of Igbo origin, attacking the former campaign spokesman of President Bola Tinubu, Dr. Josef Onoh on his defenses of the Tinubu administration.

    I’ve been provoked by the sentimental attacks, and I wish to submit, subtly, that as a proud son of Igbo land and a committed Nigerian, Onoh’s steadfast support for Presiden Tinubu reflects not only his personal conviction but also the enduring values of unity, integrity, and dedication to Nigeria’s progress that he has upheld throughout his political journey. 

    The assertion that loyalty and respect are absent from Igbo culture is a stereotype that crumbles under the weight of history and evidence. The Igbo people have consistently demonstrated unwavering commitment to shared causes, from the sacrifices of our forebears in Nigeria’s struggle for independence to the resilience shown in rebuilding the Igbo communities in post-Nigeria civil war. 

    Although the average Igbo tends to react with emotions in their political choices rather than calculated strategies, which has continuously jeopardized our political progress, Onoh’s loyalty to President Tinubu is a continuation of this legacy—a deliberate choice rooted in the belief that Tinubu’s vision for a united, prosperous Nigeria aligns with the aspirations of all Nigerians, including the Igbo.

    As the Southeast spokesman for the All Progressives Congress (APC) during the 2023 presidential campaign, Onoh championed President Tinubu’s agenda not out of blind allegiance or reward of a political appointment but from a deep-seated conviction in his capacity to address Nigeria’s challenges, including the marginalization concerns of the Southeast. 

    His role as Executive Chairman of the Enugu Capital Territory Development Authority and his earlier service in the Enugu State House of Assembly demonstrate his commitment to transformative leadership and public service—values that mirror the President’s dedication to national renewal. 

    Onoh’s decision to support the APC and President Tinubu, despite his roots in the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), was not a betrayal of heritage as he was constantly accused of by almost all south Easterns, but a bold step toward fostering inclusivity and collaboration across Nigeria’s diverse regions.

    Loyalty, for Onoh, is not mere deference but a principled stand to uphold what is just and progressive. It is the same loyalty that drove him to advocate for infrastructure development in Enugu, such as the modernization of the Akanu Ibiam International Airport and urban decongestion projects, ensuring that the Southeast contributes to and benefits from Nigeria’s growth. 

    Read Also: Obienyem’s criticism on Onoh, not answer to issues raised

    His Igbo heritage, far from lacking respect or loyalty, is defined by a culture of resilience, community, and honor—qualities he brought to his support for President Tinubu’s administration. He stands by Tinubu as a partner in building a Nigeria where every region thrives, proving that loyalty is not only part of Igbo culture but a cornerstone of the Igbo contribution to the nation’s greatness irrespective of the name callings and negativity he is currently receiving from various quarters.

    Smear campaigns and threats especially from my Igbo brothers and sisters for his defense for the president against the statements of Rt. Hon. Chibuike Amaechi whom I know Onoh holds in high esteem together with His Excellency, Mr. Peter Obi; it doesn’t restrain his decision and choice to support, promote the policies, and defend the administration of President Tinubu until the end of his term as president of Nigeria. 

    In Theodore Roosevelt Speech, ‘Citizenship in a Republic,’ delivered in 1910, Roosevelt said, “It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who strives, who dares greatly, and who perseveres, who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat.”

    Therefore, Onoh’s support for President Tinubu keeps a date with destiny and may be part of his legacy which will never be defined by reward or non reward with political appointments. It could rather be a legacy of loyalty and service to country at a period values have been eroded by political gratifications in place of integrity. Josef Onoh  remains his father’s son!

    Comrade Ude, former APC chairman, writes from Enugu State

  • Obienyem’s criticism on Onoh, not answer to issues raised

    Obienyem’s criticism on Onoh, not answer to issues raised

    • By Adolphus Ude

    Dear Mr Valentine Obienyem, your recent statement, widely circulated across media platforms, seeks to disparage the character and credibility of Dr. Josef Umunnakwe Onoh while defending Mr. Peter Obi’s political integrity. While your loyalty to your principal is commendable, the tone, content, and accusations leveled against Dr. Onoh are not only misleading but also steeped in a sanctimonious narrative that obfuscates the truth and seeks to elevate one man above scrutiny while unjustly vilifying another. Allow me to address your claims with the clarity and sobriety they demand.

    First, your attempt to sanctify Mr. Obi’s relationship with the late Dim Chukwuemeka Odumegwu-Ojukwu, while emotionally evocative, is a calculated distraction from the substantive issue at hand: Mr. Obi’s alleged commitment to a one-term presidency and whether he has honored promises made to revered figures like Ojukwu. 

    Dr. Onoh’s critique, far from being a “cheap political commentary,” is a legitimate inquiry into the consistency of Mr. Obi’s public declarations. To dismiss this as “morally hollow” or “politically opportunistic” is to evade accountability by cloaking it in sentimentality. If, as you claim, Dr. Onoh’s invocation of Ojukwu’s name is distasteful, then you must equally condemn the frequent use of Ojukwu’s legacy by various political actors, including those in Mr. Obi’s camp, to bolster their narratives when convenient. The selective outrage here is telling.

    Your vivid recounting of Mr. Obi’s visits to Ojukwu in a UK hospital and his role in organizing a befitting burial is noted. However, these acts of personal devotion, while admirable, do not immunize Mr. Obi from questions about his political promises. Respect for Ojukwu’s memory does not preclude scrutiny of whether commitments made in his name were upheld. You challenge Dr. Onoh to name specific promises Mr. Obi reneged on, yet you provide no substantive rebuttal to the core allegation regarding the one-term vow. Instead, you resort to emotional anecdotes and vague assertions of Mr. Obi’s moral clarity. 

    If Dr. Onoh’s claims are baseless, as you assert, then the burden lies with you to clarify, with specificity, the nature of Mr. Obi’s commitments and their fulfillment, rather than deflecting with tales of hospital visits and funeral arrangements.

    Your accusation that Dr. Onoh “did not even make a phone call” to Ojukwu or his family is a low blow, unbefitting the decorum you claim to uphold. Personal relationships, particularly those as private as familial ties, should not be weaponized for public spectacle. Dr. Onoh’s restraint in not parading his personal interactions with Ojukwu or his family does not equate to indifference or neglect. To suggest otherwise is to engage in the very “cheap political commentary” you decry. 

    Furthermore, your attempt to shame Dr. Onoh for not matching Mr. Obi’s public displays of devotion is a distraction from the substantive issue of political accountability, which Dr. Onoh’s critique seeks to address.

    Turning to your allegations of academic forgery and political inconsistency against Dr. Onoh, these are grave charges that demand evidence, not innuendo. You reference “questionable” certificates and “disputed” credentials without providing a shred of substantiation. Such accusations, if untrue, constitute defamation and undermine the moral high ground you claim to occupy. Dr. Onoh’s academic and professional record is a matter of public scrutiny, and if you possess credible evidence of malfeasance, it is your duty to present it rather than rely on insinuations. Dr. Onoh has been engaged in political activities since the days of GDM and has run for various public offices while serving both elective and appointed political offices up to running for the office of Governor of Enugu State in the 2023 election and his academic records have never been in question aside from the false claim you project without evidence just to deviate attention from the substantive questions posed to your principal. I’m sure all who knows, Dr. Onoh will definitely give your defamatory allegations the attention it deserves at a time of his choosing. 

    Similarly, your characterization of Dr. Onoh’s political engagements as driven by “stomach infrastructure” is a tired trope, devoid of nuance, and dismissive of the complexities of political decision-making. Dr. Onoh’s support for any candidate or administration reflects the dynamic nature of political alliances, a reality Mr. Obi himself is not immune to, given his own transitions across party lines over the years.

    Your critique of Dr. Onoh’s supposed volte-face on the Tinubu administration is equally disingenuous. Political discourse thrives on the ability to reassess positions based on evolving realities. If Dr. Onoh has expressed disillusionment with any administration, it is a reflection of critical engagement, not opportunism. To castigate him for this while ignoring Mr. Obi’s own political maneuvers—such as his departure from the PDP to the Labour Party—reveals a double standard. Political consistency is not servitude to a single cause but the ability to adapt to the needs of the moment while maintaining one’s principles. 

    Read Also: Onoh mourns victims of Ghana helicopter crash

    Dr. Onoh’s public utterances, which you label “abrasive” and “immature,” are better described as forthright and unapologetic—a necessary counterbalance to the often sanitized rhetoric of political elites.

    On the matter of Mr. Obi’s one-term vow, your defense hinges on the constitutional permissibility of such a commitment and its alignment with principles of equity and zoning. While the Constitution indeed allows for a renewable four-year term, the issue is not one of legality but of trust. A public commitment to a single term, if made, is a pledge to the electorate, not a mere constitutional exercise. Dr. Onoh’s inquiry into whether Mr. Obi has wavered on this promise is a legitimate question of political integrity, not an attack on his character. Your dismissal of this critique as “ironic and offensive” sidesteps the need for transparency. If Mr. Obi’s record “speaks for itself,” as you claim, then let it speak through clear evidence of his adherence to this vow, rather than through rhetorical flourishes.

    Finally, your assertion that Dr. Onoh “lacks the moral standing” to critique Mr. Obi is a presumptuous judgment that undermines the principles of open discourse. In a democratic society, no one is above scrutiny, and no one’s character is so pristine as to render their critics morally deficient by default. Dr. Onoh, like any citizen, has the right to question the actions and promises of public figures, particularly those who aspire to the highest offices in the land. To suggest otherwise is to elevate Mr. Obi to an untouchable pedestal, which is antithetical to the accountability you claim to champion.

    In conclusion, Mr. Obienyem, your statement is a masterclass in deflection, weaving emotional narratives and personal attacks to obscure the substantive issues raised by Dr. Onoh. If you seek to defend Mr. Obi’s integrity, do so with facts, not sanctimony. Dr. Onoh’s critique, far from being opportunistic, is a call for accountability—a call that deserves a response grounded in evidence, not vitriol. The Nigerian public, whom you both claim to serve, deserves nothing less.

  • Onoh faults Timi Frank over alleged fake documents against Wike

    Onoh faults Timi Frank over alleged fake documents against Wike

    President Bola Tinubu’s former campaign spokesman in the south east, Dr Josef Onoh, has threatened to send the former spokesman of the All Progressives Congress (APC), Mr Timi Frank, to two years imprisonment for parading uncertified documents against the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) Ezenwo Nyesom Wike and President Tinubu’s administration.

    Frank had disseminated documents to the media where he alleged that the FCT minister has been amassing lands in Abuja to fund the 2027 campaign for President Tinubu.

    But Onoh faulted Frank’s documents as fake and uncertified, referring him to landmark judgements where uncerified documents were rendered null and void and as false claims.

    Onoh stated that Wike’s Contributions to FCT development since assuming office in August 2023 were not limited to infrastructural advancements in the FCT roads rehabilitation and schools improvement, but also in enhanced security measures. 

    Onoh noted that Wike’s revenue generation strategies have increased the FCT’s internally generated revenue from Eight to Nine billion Naira monthly, sufficient to fund projects, demonstrating Wike’s commitment to public welfare and not personal or political enrichment.

    He said that Frank’s reliance on unverified and uncertified documents to support his allegations is legally untenable and undermines the principles of evidence under Nigerian law. 

    “Even the Evidence Act 2011: Section 89(e) requires that public documents, such as land allocation records, be certified to be admissible in evidence.”

    He stressed that an uncertified document lacks authenticity just like the ones in circulation that Frank based his statements upon and cannot be relied upon in legal proceedings or as a basis for public accusations. 

    “Also Frank and social media bloggers should know that Section 104 mandates that copies of public documents must be certified by the appropriate authority to confirm their genuineness. Without certification, such documents are mere hearsay and lack probative value and that’s the point I intend to make Nigerians understand, including Comrade Frank.

    “The Supreme Court of Nigeria in cases like Araka v. Egbue (2003) and Ogbunyiya v. Okudo (1979) has consistently held that uncertified documents are inadmissible and cannot form the basis of any legitimate claim or accusation. Mr. Frank’s failure to provide certified evidence renders his allegations speculative and legally baseless.

    “By peddling unverified claims, Mr. Frank is not only misleading the public but also risks legal consequences for spreading false information, as such actions contravene the principles of fair hearing and due process enshrined in the Nigerian Constitution. 

    “I dare him to push such false narratives against Mr. President and he will feel the full weight of the law. Freedom of speech doesn’t mean one should constitute himself a charlatan and nuisance especially Timi Frank’s utterances,” Onoh dared.

    He noted that accusing Minister Wike of looting Abuja lands to fund President Tinubu’s 2027 campaign constitute a clear violation of Section 391 of the Penal Code Act, which addresses criminal defamation. 

    The section provides that, ‘Whoever, by words either spoken or written, or by signs or visible representations, imputes anything to any person with intent to harm the reputation of such person, or knowing or having reason to believe that such imputation will harm the reputation of such person, is said to defame that person.’ 

    It also stipulates that such an act is punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to two years, or with a fine, or with both.

    “Frank’s Imputation of criminal conduct, by alleging that Minister Wike is “looting” public lands and engaging in corrupt practices to fund a political campaign, imputes criminal behavior, including abuse of office and misappropriation of public assets, without evidence. This directly harms the reputation of both Minister Wike and my principal, President Tinubu. 

    “His statements, made publicly and without substantiation, demonstrate a reckless intent to tarnish Minister Wike’s reputation and undermine his credibility as a public servant. Including the president. The inflammatory nature of the accusations, coupled with their dissemination through media channels, amplifies the defamatory impact.

    “As a former deputy spokesman of the APC, I had presumed Mr. Frank understands the gravity of making unverified allegations against a serving minister. I’m utterly disappointed at his failure to provide certified evidence or credible documentation, which shows a knowing disregard for the truth, fulfilling the mens rea (guilty mind) required under Section 391. 

    Read Also: Allegations against Wike political, unsubstantiated, says Onoh

    “The reason why I maintain his comments was politically motivated and not in the interest of Nigerians is because his allegations also seek to erode public trust in the Tinubu administration by suggesting complicity through the President’s alleged “silence.” which constitutes an attack on the integrity of the government, further compounding the defamatory nature of his statements.

    “Finally, Mr. Timi Frank’s allegations are politically motivated attempts to discredit Minister Nyesom Wike’s exemplary service in the FCT. The claims are devoid of evidence, rely on inadmissible uncertified documents, and violate Section 391 of the Penal Code Act by defaming the Minister and the President. 

    “I urge the public to disregard these baseless accusations and commend the ongoing efforts of anti-corruption agencies to investigate any credible claims. Minister Wike remains committed to transforming the FCT in line with President Tinubu’s Renewed Hope Agenda, and such distractions will not deter his focus on delivering for Nigerians. 

    “Timi Frank is only good at Frankly lying, and I dare him to publish further unverified statements and risk the consequences of his irresponsibility,” Onoh dared.

  • Allegations against Wike political, unsubstantiated, says Onoh

    Allegations against Wike political, unsubstantiated, says Onoh

    A former spokesperson for President Bola Tinubu in the southeast, Josef Onoh, has described recent calls for the removal of Nyesom Wike, the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) Minister, as politically motivated and lacking in substance.

    Onoh, in a statement, said the allegations, especially those concerning illegal land allocations, were not backed by verifiable evidence and appeared aimed at discrediting the minister’s efforts to transform the FCT.

    He maintained that Wike’s actions in office were guided by the law and aligned with the development objectives of the FCT.

    Citing constitutional provisions and existing land administration laws, Onoh argued that Wike’s decisions on land allocation and revocation were lawful.

    According to him, the Land Use Act of 1978 vests land administration authority in the FCT Minister, adding that Section 302 of the 1999 Constitution (as amended) empowers the Minister to exercise delegated authority from the President.

    READ ALSO: Troops foil terrorist attacks, neutralise dozens in Zamfara-Niger axis

    Responding to claims that the Minister had allocated land to family members and associates, Onoh noted that no official documents or credible evidence have been presented to support such claims.

    He pointed to Section 36(1) of the Constitution, which guarantees the right to a fair hearing and the presumption of innocence.

    Continuing, Onoh noted that the FCT administration under Wike has repeatedly clarified that all land allocations were carried out within the framework of the Abuja Master Plan, adding that Wike had publicly denied allocating land to his children and asked those in doubt to scrutinise records of land allocations.

    On allegations involving companies reportedly linked to Wike’s family members, Onoh said these remained unproven. He also noted that even if the individuals in question had applied for land, they are entitled to be treated equally under Section 42 of the Constitution, which prohibits discrimination.

    Addressing the revocation of certain land titles, including that of an embassy, Onoh said such actions were within the Minister’s powers under the Land Use Act, provided they followed due process. He emphasised that revocations tied to violations of the Abuja Master Plan or undocumented land holdings were consistent with the minister’s mandate.

    He acknowledged the ongoing investigation reportedly ordered by President Tinubu into similar allegations, describing it as a sign of the administration’s commitment to accountability.

    On the role of the National Assembly, Onoh said oversight was vital but must be evidence-based. According to him, the absence of formal petitions or concrete proof may explain why the legislature has not taken a definitive stance on the matter.

    He highlighted several infrastructure projects under Wike’s leadership, including road construction, solar-powered streetlights, and urban renewal initiatives, as tangible signs of progress in the FCT.

    Onoh cautioned critics against making unverified public allegations, warning that such actions might run afoul of defamation laws under the Penal Code Act.

    Concluding, Onoh reiterated that Wike’s administration in the FCT was operating within the bounds of the law, urging anyone with evidence of wrongdoing to present it to the appropriate authorities rather than resorting to public speculation.

  • APC’s real threat lies within not ADC coalition – Onoh

    APC’s real threat lies within not ADC coalition – Onoh

    Dr. Josef Onoh, the former southeast spokesman to President Bola Ahmed Tinubu has warned the African Democratic Congress (ADC) coalition led by opposition heavyweights like Atiku Abubakar and Peter Obi, is not the primary threat to his re-election bid. 

    He cautioned the real danger against Tinubu’s 2027 reelection bid lies within largely non-performing cabinet members. 

    He alleged many of the Ministers have personal ambitions and do not champion the administration’s achievements jeopardising Tinubu’s chances in 2027.

    He argued the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) Nyesom Wike stands out and has consistently and publicly defended President Tinubu against the ADC coalition’s aggressive campaign.

    Wike un a recent a recent thanksgiving service at St. James’ Anglican Church in Asokoro, Abuja, dismissed the coalition’s motives, accusing its leaders of pursuing personal gain rather than national interest. 

    He challenged the credibility of the opposition leaders, stating that they want to rescue their stomach instead  of Nigeria. Wike used the opportunity to highlight Tinubu’s achievements, such as the rehabilitation of the Bola Tinubu International Conference Centre and the establishment of the FCT Civil Service Structure.

    “Wike’s vocal defense stands in stark contrast to the deafening silence from other ministers. I find it alarming that at a time when the opposition is mobilizing under the ADC banner, the majority of Tinubu’s cabinet members remain mute, failing to counter the coalition’s narrative or promote the administration’s successes. 

    “This lack of unity and loyalty within the cabinet can erode public confidence. Also poor ministerial performance is a liability for 2027,” Onoh warned

    The Tinubu’s 2023 campaign  spokesman in the South East has repeatedly criticised what he described as the underwhelming performance of many ministers, arguing that their inability to deliver tangible results weakens the administration’s case for re-election. 

    Onoh argued some of the Ministers tasked with implementing Tinubu’s Renewed Hope Agenda, have not demonstrated the capacity to mobilise grassroots support for the President’s re-election. 

    “Without visible achievements or a compelling narrative from the cabinet, the APC risks losing ground to the ADC coalition, which is capitalizing on public discontent to position itself as a viable alternative,” he cautioned. 

    “An incumbent  minister has openly declared his intention to contest the 2027 governorship election in on of the south west  states, signaling a shift in focus from his ministerial duties to personal political goals. Similarly, other Ministers are reportedly eyeing governorship races or other political offices in their home states, diverting their energy from advancing Tinubu’s agenda.

    “This pursuit of personal ambition, undermines the cohesion and effectiveness of the cabinet. Ministers preoccupied with their own political futures are unlikely to invest in mobilizing support for Tinubu’s re-election or promoting his administration’s achievements. This internal disarray could prove fatal in 2027, as a fragmented cabinet fails to present a united front against a determined opposition coalition.”

    He emphasised that a cabinet that does not share the President’s vision is a ticking time bomb, stressing  that the lack of synergy among Ministers, coupled with their failure to actively promote Tinubu’s achievements, creates a vacuum that the ADC coalition is exploiting. 

    Onoh argued qthat the coalition’s energy stems from the administration’s inability to effectively communicate its successes. 

    “For instance, Tinubu’s reforms, such as the removal of the fuel subsidy, increased state allocations, and advancements in infrastructure, have been cited as significant achievements by supporters like Lagos State Governor Babajide Sanwo-Olu. 

    “Yet, these milestones are rarely amplified by cabinet members or heads of agencies, leaving the public unaware of the progress made.

    He warned that failure to act swiftly could affect  2027, as the opposition continues to gain traction. 

    Read Also: Onoh clears air on Tinubu’s ‘Reconcile Benue’ directive

    Onoh further criticised heads of government agencies for their failure to promote Tinubu’s achievements. 

    “Agencies responsible for key sectors such as education, healthcare, and infrastructure have not effectively communicated the impact of policies such as the student loan initiative or increased oil production. This silence allows the opposition to paint a one-sided picture of failure, further fueling public discontent,” he lamented. 

    Onoh argued that agency heads, like ministers, must be held accountable for their role in advancing the administration’s agenda. Their failure to highlight tangible results undermines Tinubu’s re-election prospects and strengthens the ADC coalition’s narrative of a government in disarray.

    According to him: “Cabinet reshuffle is not just a necessity but an urgent imperative to ensure that his team is aligned with his vision and capable of countering the opposition’s momentum. The ADC coalition, while formidable, is not Tinubu’s greatest challenge. The real danger lies in a cabinet and administration that fail to deliver, communicate, or unite behind their leader.

    “Failure to do so could hand the opposition the ammunition they need to derail Tinubu’s re-election bid in 2027. The clock is ticking, and the president must act now to secure his legacy and Nigeria’s future. Mr. President, you are a general alone, leading compromised soldiers to battle.”

  • Onoh denies Tinubu endorsed Mbah for second term

    Onoh denies Tinubu endorsed Mbah for second term

    President Bola Tinubu’s former campaign spokesman in the South East Dr Josef Onoh has refuted the claim by a billionaire businessman, Prince Arthur Eze, that President Tinubu has endorsed Enugu Governor, Peter Mbah, for re-election.

    Onoh said that the statement was Eze’s personal opinion and did not represent any official position of the Presidency. 

    Onoh noted Tinubu is a member of the All Progressives Congress (APC) and could not have endorsed Governor Mbah of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), that would have amounted to anti-party activity.

    He said the President is focused on stabilising the economy and tackling insecurity and not in the business of endorsing state Governors for second term, adding that the resources that the Federal Government makes available to the State Governments are enough to make their people reward the Governors with second terms.

    “President Tinubu belongs to the APC while Gov Mbah is from the opposition PDP. Having been one of the prominent Nigerians who fought for democracy, the president was elected to serve Nigerians, hence endorsing any Governor for a second term in office is an anti- democratic action. 

    “The President is a firm believer that it’s the people, your constituents, the electorates who have the sole powers of endorsing anyone seeking political office, be it for a second term. Therefore any performing Governor, National and State Assembly members down to the local governments in Nigeria can only be endorsed by their people based on performance. It’s only the electorates in Enugu state that have powers to endorse the Governor,” he said. 

    Onoh said that the same goes to all the elected and appointed political office holders that are endorsing the president for a second term in office.

    “As much as that gesture is highly appreciated, it is counter productive and amounts to nothing if you have failed to provide effective representation and democratic dividends for your constituents and state. Your performance is the most important and greatest endorsement the president appreciates and not your praise-singing, because he believes your performance should speak for you and once you are performing, the people will support and follow you.”

    Onoh however noted the Federal government has provided all necessary support for all Governors to perform such that the monthly Federation Account Allocation Committee (FAAC) allocations to states in 2023 ranged from N403.39 billion (in March) to N627.73 billion (in September). 

    Read Also: Tinubu and contact with the Onoh family

    “Enugu’s share would be based on the revenue-sharing formula (26.72% for states collectively, with Enugu’s portion depending on population and other factors). Enugu’s deductions for debt repayments were relatively low, at N1.88 billion in Q2 2023, suggesting a higher net allocation compared to states with larger deductions. 

    “Also the 2024 FAAC Allocations, states were projected to receive N5.54 trillion in 2024, a 69% increase from N3.3 trillion in 2023. Enugu was projected to receive N120 billion for the entire year based on the 2024 approved budget.”

    He recalled that in reports from June 2023 to May 2024, Enugu’s allocation increased by 42.82% compared to the previous 12 months (June 2022–May 2023).

    “Enugu State likely received approximately N225–240 billion in federal allocations from June 2023 to May 2025, based on a 2024 projection of N120 billion. An estimated N70 billion for the second half of 2023, and N35–50 billion for the first five months of 2025.”

    He noted that the above was a rough estimate due to incomplete monthly data and reliance on projections, but that it clearly demonstrates the president’s reforms and support for all state governors to discharge their duties without hindrance. 

    “So if you perform, the people will vote you in or out and not President Bola Ahmed Tinubu. Hence, the claim of Mr. President’s endorsement is more of a political statement for the occasion as it lacks corroboration from primary sources such as official statements from the presidency.

    “Historically, Nigeria presidents had rarely, if ever, publicly endorsed opposition figures for governorship re-elections due to the polarized nature of party politics. For instance, during the 2023 election cycle, former President Muhammadu Buhari (APC) endorsed President Bola Tinubu (APC) for president, not opposition candidates, and focused on supporting APC Governors and candidates. 

    “Similarly, Presidents such Goodluck Jonathan (PDP) and Olusegun Obasanjo (PDP) prioritized their party’s interests during their tenures, with no clear instances of endorsing opposition Governors for re-election. Rather there are cases of opposition governors defecting to the ruling party, which can be interpreted as implicit support. 

    “Governors Sheriff Oborevwori (Delta State) and Umo Eno (Akwa Ibom State), both originally PDP, defected to the APC and expressed admiration for Tinubu’s leadership. So, if Governor Peter Mbah wants our support he should boldly defect to our party, the APC.

    “While this could be seen as aligning with the president’s influence, it does not constitute a direct endorsement for a second term while they were still opposition members. We are in the business of running a country and not endorsements. The presidency isn’t INEC!”

  • Onoh congratulates Bwala on appointment as SPA media to Tinubu

    Onoh congratulates Bwala on appointment as SPA media to Tinubu

    President Bola Tinubu’s former campaign spokesman in the south east, Dr. Josef Onoh  has congratulated Dr. Daniel Bwala on his appointment by the President as his Special adviser, Media and Public Communications (State House).

    Bwala, a lawyer from Borno state, was formerly of the All Progressives Congress (APC) but left the party for the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) where he was made the campaign spokesman of the 2023 presidential candidate of the PDP Atiku Abubakar.

    While working for Atiku and the PDP, Bwala criticised Tinubu’s presidential aspiration but returned to the APC after Tinubu won the election and on accepting his present appointment by the President described Tinubu as “a courageous commander-in-chief and father.”

    In his congratulatory message, Onoh who was Bwala’s counterpart during the campaign, said that even though Bwala’s appointment may not go down well with some APC loyalists of the President, it was based on Bwala’s experience and his capability to handle the complex engagements in politics which which Onoh said Bwala vigorously did in recent times while most of the party loyalists and President’s appointees abandoned the president to his own fate with their silence. 

    Onoh said that Bwala has “officially become the first political spokesperson to achieve such political trinity in Nigeria political space in recent times,” taking cognizance of the fact that Bwala was an APC spokesman who left the party because of his stand against same-faith ticket of Tinubu and his running mate, Kashim Shetima.

    Onoh challenged Bwala to keep up the momentum in the defence of President Tinubu and not to go silent on critics of the President, more so when he (Bwala) had accused Tinubu’s appointees of not defending the President in times of attacks and not promoting his administration’s achievements. 

    “I wish you a successful and productive term in office in service of our nation,” Onoh congratulated.

  • Onoh felicitates with IBB at 83rd birthday

    Onoh felicitates with IBB at 83rd birthday

    President Bola Tinubu’s former spokesman in the south east, Denge Dr. Josef Onoh, has felicitated with former Military President, Ibrahim Badamosi Babangida (IBB) on his 83rd birthday.

    Onoh said he celebrates IBB at 83 because of his consistent nationalism, patriotic inclination and leadership mentorship over the years.

    “I thank the Almighty for the gift of life and his mercies upon you. To many, you are a mystery wrapped in a riddle, inside an Enigma. To us you remain an endearing friend, father, uncle, guardian, grandfather, pillar of wisdom and most of all, the people’s General of Generals!

    Read Also: Onoh seeks removal of immunity clause for Govs, Deputies

    “I celebrate you once again, I’m indeed lucky and blessed to have and still benefit from your fatherly advice.

    “in the words of Shakespeare, ‘Sweet are the uses of adversity, which, like the toad, ugly and venomous, wears yet a precious jewel in his head; and this our life, exempt from public haunt, finds tongues in trees, books in the running brooks, sermons in stones, and good in every thing.’ Happy Birthday General,” he said. 

  • Onoh seeks removal of immunity clause for Govs, Deputies

    Onoh seeks removal of immunity clause for Govs, Deputies

    President Bola Tinubu’s former spokesman in the south east, Denge. Dr. Josef Onoh, has asked the National Assembly to repeal immunity clause in section 308 of the 1999 Constitution that confers immunity on Governors and Deputies.

    He was reacting to Minister for Niger Delta Development, Abubakar Momoh, assertion that the performances of some Governors were contributing to economic hardship in the country.

    The Minister argued that the Federal Government was doing enough to end economic hardship in the country but that some Governors were allegedly sabotaging the efforts.

    Momoh spoke on Tuesday when he appeared as a guest on Channels TV. 

    Onoh stated that the import of such immunity clause warrants the urgent need to remove the immunity clause in the organic law of Nigeria as an anomaly which breeds unaccountability and corruption in governance in Nigeria.

    Onoh stated that the Federal Government was doing enough to end economic hardship in the country, and have extended palliatives to Governors to cushion the hardship in their various states. 

    According to him, these measures were not promoted by some Governors which would have helped tame the ongoing protests. 

    He pointed out President Bola Tinubu has so far released N570b livelihood support fund to States; another N50bn to NELFUND for students loan; N50bn Credit Corporation; N200bn Consumer Credit Corporation and N1bn single digit loans to manufacturrers among others. 

    He listed others as N5bn intervention to States; 

    $617.7M IDICE to 36 States and FCT with a target of 25,000 youths trained in each state and FCT; 

    42,000 MT of grains to all 36 states and FCT;  Allocation of 20 trucks of rice to each state and FCT

    He argued : “If the Federal government has done all this and hardship still persists in the country then it’s unfortunate and the more reason I urge the National Assembly to repeal the immunity clause of the governors and deputies in the constitution.” 

    Onoh said that the origin of the doctrine of immunity cannot be located but predicated on the doctrine of sovereign immunity practiced from time immemorial as a feudal concept of ancient England. 

    He stressed: ” It later became a Common Law principle. It was introduced into Nigeria as a colony of Britain. Hence, Nigeria inherited it as one of the Common Wealth countries under the British Crown. 

    “The doctrine of immunity presupposes that the king can do no wrong”. This concept of sovereign immunity, put differently, immunity of the leader at the apex, was enunciated to make any direct court action or claims against the Crown and today our governors are abusing with impunity.

    Read Also: Onoh to Peter Obi: Tinubu already addressing protesters’ demands

    “In my opinion, The Nigerian experience of the immunity clause in the constitution has been horrendous, traumatic and have yielded to social anomaly in the sense of mis-governance and underdevelopment. 

    “The immunity clause has overwhelmingly continued to serve as conduit pipes for siphoning the nation’s wealth by Nigerian leaders without any fear of litigation or challenge and this is the right time to bring change if our nation must overcome our current challenges.

    “Take a look at the 33 Oyo LG Chairmen that recently Pulled Out Of ALGON Over Supreme Court Ruling On Autonomy that granted financial autonomy to local government across the country while declaring absolute loyalty to their governor to the detriment of the liberty and benefit of the masses in the grassroots. Take a look at the protesters that had to raid a warehouse that palliatives delivered to their state by the president to cushion the hardship were hidden and not distributed to the people, this impunity was caused by immunity. 

    ” I’ve always maintained that constitutional immunity serves as protection shield or a legitimate instrument of corruption and money laundering by crooks masquerading as public officials. In reality, the clause has not only created a class of people who are above the law and I urge the National Assembly to repeal it and liberate Nigerians. Once this is done it will put an end to protests and enthrone the rule of law in Nigeria.

    “As much as the Governors will oppose immunity for the president alone, it’s common sense to confer immunity on the president because the office of the President and decisions of the President in defence of our nation must confer the president sovereign immunity. Governors are only dealing with internal affairs but the president deals beyond national affairs to international.

    “The defence of immunity has rendered ineffective and impotent the machinery set up by the government through Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), the Kogi State standoff has damaged the reputation of the agency which in turn has damaged our image as a country. Independent Corrupt Practices and other Related Commission (ICPC) and Code of Conduct Bureau, all of which are to sanitize the society of corruption and other vices.

    ” Therefore, many Nigerians and currently the protesters have asked for strengthening these agencies and the only way forward is for the removal of immunity clause as the only way the Nigerian people can benefit from the massive wealth and resources of the nation which are laundered abroad. It’s time to renew hope.

    We have continuously asked Nigerians to hold their state Governors accountable before and during this hardship protest, this is an advice we know will spell doom for any citizen it will automatically become an offence and an offence which an incumbent executive officer cannot be prosecuted, an ordinary citizen will be immediately convicted for such an offence. 

    “With this, there is no respect for the rule of law which postulates equality for every Nigerian before the law. Though the period of non-prosecution of these public officers is for the period of their offices, the time which the ordinary citizen would have to wait amounts to ‘justice delayed and justice denied’.

    “This is why creating state police under the control of state governor will spell doom for every Nigerian.

    “Nothing can ever be achieved by protests, President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s administration is doing it’s utmost best to stabilise the economy and his administration is being sabotaged hence it’s up to us to unite and ensure we succeed as a nation because if we fail, today we are dealing with protesters but if we don’t drop the protest and work together, those protesting today will meet a next  dangerous generation that will think looting is a carrier and violent protests, and acceptable way of life.

    ” The fate of our nation is in the hands of our national assembly, we only have one country and it’s our collective responsibility to stop blaming others and represent the people because political office isn’t a job, it’s temporal and after we leave office we will all return back to the people and become part of the people. What an irony!”