Tag: oppose

  • Ado-Ekiti indigenes oppose sale of Erekesin market

    Indigenes of Ado-Ekiti, the Ekiti State capital, at home and in the Diaspora have cautioned Governor Ayodele Fayose against selling the Erekesin (Oja Oba) Market in the capital town.

    Rising from their meeting on Monday, the indigenes warned the governor against tramping “on the most important and central heritage of all homogeneous Ado-Ekiti people under any guise” by selling the market stalls “either directly or through balloting”.

    Erekesin Market is the traditional property of Ado-Ekiti indigenes from time immemorial.

    It has been held in trust for the people in their trades by the local government council, which has the constitutional right of its administration, and not the state government.

    A statement by the indigenes’ spokesman Adinlewa Mogundegbe said: “Buyers are hereby advised in their own interest not to purchase ballot forms for the sale of Erekesin Oja Oba Market in Ado-Ekiti or buy any stall in the market.”

  • APC governors, state chairmen oppose direct primaries ahead of NEC

    Ahead of the primaries of the All Progressives Congress (APC), the governors and state chairmen are opposed to direct primaries – the party’s antidote against imposition of candidates. They prefer indirect primaries.

    Key stakeholders in the party, including some leaders and members of the National Assembly, have opted for direct primary because, in their view, it will give members a say on the choice of their representatives.

    There were fears that the desire for indirect primaries by the governors was designed to give them “total” control and to determine those who will be candidates for various elective posts.

    In an August 17 letter to the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), the APC only indicated that it might adopt indirect or direct system for the presidential primary on September 19.

    The governors and the state chairmen are said to have communicated their preference for indirect primary to National Chairman Adams Oshiomhole.

    The chairman and members of the National Working Committee (NWC) have however left the final decision to the  National Executive Committee (NEC), which will meet on Thursday  in Abuja.

    A source in the party, who spoke in confidence, said: “There is a fresh challenge in the party because the governors are opposed to direct primaries. Some of them seeking second term in office want indirect primaries to make it easier to get the ticket.

    “A few others completing second term prefer indirect primaries to be able to impose their favourites as candidates for various elective offices.

    “The governors, who have influenced state chairmen of the party, are claiming that the time is too short for direct primaries. They are also nursing fears that direct primaries could lead to crises, including violent primaries.”

    It was however learnt that many senators, members of the House of Representatives and Houses of Assembly and governorship aspirants are worried that the governors have been scheming for indirect primaries “to hijack the process.”

    A senator said: “The governors are out to seize the process and give tickets to their cronies. To get quality candidates for 2019 polls, we have to check these governors who want to determine those to be APC flag bearers.

    “Most leaders of the party have opted for direct primaries in view of the huge success the model recorded in Osun State.

    “Popular candidates were not given the opportunity to emerge in the past because the indirect primaries were turned to merchandise.

    “Like the leadership of the party said, it will ensure participation of all registered members. It will be a departure of what obtained in the past, which was monetised.

    “We will resist any plot by the governors to insist on indirect primaries. We learnt that they have forced the state chairmen to adopt indirect primaries.”

    APC Acting National Publicity Secretary Yekini Nabena said: “All these issues will be tabled at the NEC meeting. Why not wait till after the meeting on Thursday?”

    Oshiomhole on July 17 highlighted the benefits of direct primaries. He said: “We have decided that in order to ensure popular participation, and to deepen democracy in Osun State, in-line with the provision of our party constitution, which allows for either direct or indirect primary, we have resolved that the governorship election primary in Osun State will be conducted on the basis of direct primary.

    “What that means is that every card carrying member of our party will participate in the process of nominating the flag bearer of the party. This, for us, is the most democratic way to conduct election and is in line with what our critical stakeholders from that part of the country wants and we are quite happy to oblige.”

    Oshiomhole said the direct option was to allow more party members to “participate in the process of nominating candidates and to remove issues of corruption or monetising the processes.”

    He said direct primary would also “give party members a sense of ownership of the outcome of the exercise”.

  • ‘OPS ‘ll oppose duplication of VAT, taxes ’

    ‘OPS ‘ll oppose duplication of VAT, taxes ’

    Nigeria Employers’ Consul-tative Association (NECA) has expressed displeasure at attempts by the government  to strangulate businesses through multiple and duplication of taxes and levies in the country.

    It specifically took a swipe at the enactment of Kano State Revenue Administration (Amendment) Law 2017, which imposed Consumption Tax on goods and services bought or rendered in a hotel, restaurant, eatery, bakery, takeaway, suya spot, shopping mall, store, event centre and other similar businesses in the state.

    Reacting to the law, NECA Director-General Mr. Olusegun Oshinowo,  said: “The imposition of Consumption Tax by Kano State amounted to a duplication of Value Added Tax (VAT), which our Laws frown against, as stated by the Supreme Court in the case of Attorney-General of Ogun State vs. Aberuagba and Ors.

    “We do not agree with the imposition of such tax due to the existence of Value Added Tax (VAT) in the country. This is because VAT is a consumption tax collectible by the Federal Government (and shared among the states) in respect of sale of goods and provision of services within the Federation.”

    Oshinowo said in response to this, NECA has instituted an action to challenge such imposition by Kano State government.

    He explained further that the cause of the recent development is the Taxes and Levies (Approved List for Collection) Act (Amendment) Order 2015, which several states are misinterpreting and now leveraging to enact laws that clearly amount to and promote duplication of taxes. This trend, according to him, is spreading like wild fire, going by the recent actions of Kogi and Delta states, just to mention but a few.

    The initiative, he said, is killing business, wealth creation and entrepreneurship, adding that it is equally a clear disincentive to foreign direct investment.

    He said: “While the private sector is not opposed to taxation, it is, however, against illegality and unreasonable taxes through imposition of multiple taxes as well as duplication of taxes. The private sector will not accept a duplication of VAT in any guise, irrespective of the name given to it by state governments”

  • Paris/London Club loan: Firms oppose temporary forfeiture of N1.4b

    Paris/London Club loan: Firms oppose temporary forfeiture of N1.4b

    Three firms have raised objections to the temporary forfeiture of N1.4bilion, being part of Paris/London Club loan, to the Federal Government.

    The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) said N1,442,384,857.84 was fraudulently obtained from the states through the Nigerian Governors Forum (NGF).

    Justice Mojisola Olatoregun of the Federal High Court in Lagos made the temporary forfeiture order on October 13 based on an ex-parte application filed by the EFCC through its lawyer Mr Ekene Iheanacho.

    The court directed the commission to advertise the order in a newspaper for any interested person to show cause as to why it should not be permanently forfeited within 14 days.

    Melrose General Services Limited, WASP Networks Limited and Thebe Wellness Services are the respondents.

    A firm, Linas International Limited and a lawyer Godwin Udemaduka have filed applications to be joined as interested parties.

    Melrose General Services has also filed an application contesting the forfeiture order.

    Its counsel Wole Akoni (SAN) said the firm will ask the court to set the order aside.

    Iheanacho prayed for an adjournment to enable him file replies to the fresh applications.

    EFCC’s investigator Usman Zakari stated in an affidavit that on May 26, last year, the NGF engaged GSCL Consulting and Bizplus Consulting Services Limited.

    He said the “GSCL Bizplus Consortium” was hired to verify, reconcile, and recover excess deductions on the loans from the accounts of states and local government areas (LGAs) between 1995 to 2002.

    The Consortium was said to have recovered $6, 483, 282, 424. 61, as the sum to be refunded to the states.

    Zakari said in line with the governors’ request, the Ministry of Finance, through the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN), paid $86,546,526.65 and N19,439,225,871.11 (representing five percent of the approved initial Paris and London Club refund) into NGF’s GTBank Plc and Access Bank Plc accounts, purportedly to defray consultancy and incidental expenses.

    The N19, 439, 225, 871.11 was paid into the Access Bank account on December 8, 2016; on December 14, 2016, the NGF paid N4,389, 207, 099 .05 to the consortium as part of agreed consultancy fee, Zakari said.

    According to him, Melrose General Services, whose alter ego is Robert Mbonu, was never engaged by the NGF for any consultancy services in relation to the Paris and London Club loan refund.

    Zakari alleged that Melrose General Services allegedly recopied and misinterpreted the consortium’s work to the NGF for payment.

    He said the firm was paid N3.5 billion by the NGF on December 14, 2016.

    Zakari said between December 15, 2016 and January 20, 2017, Melrose General Services moved out about N2,277,615,142 from its account out of the N3.5billion, leaving a balance of N1,222,384,857.84, before EFCC intervened.

    The operative said N220million was voluntarily returned by the firm.

    He, therefore, urged the court to make an order for a temporary forfeiture of N1,222, 384, 857. 84 in Melrose General Services’ Access Bank account and the recovered N220 million.

    Justice Olatoregun adjourned until November 17 for hearing.

  • Olubadan: I still oppose chieftaincy law

    Olubadan: I still oppose chieftaincy law

    The Olubadan of Ibadan land, Oba Saliu Adetunji, has said his opposition to the attempt by the government to review the Olubadan chieftaincy laws remain unchanged.

    The monarch said the recommendation of 32 crowns for Ibadan by the Boade Commission set up by Oyo State was a joke too far.

    Reacting to an interview granted the Commissioner for Local Government and Chieftaincy Matters, Mr. Bimbo Kolade, on a Splash FM programme, Oro Sunnukun, the ruler, who spoke through his Director of Media and Public Affairs, Mr. Adeola Oloko, insisted his opposition to the chieftaincy review remained same.

    According to him, the erroneous impression in that interview was that Kabiyesi had, at one time, opposed the chieftaincy review before he changed his mind to support it.

    Oba Adetunji said: “For the avoidance of doubt, there was never a time the Olubadan supported the review embarked upon by the Oyo State government. This was why the first-class monarch did not submit any memorandum nor make any representation to the panel. When, last week, the panel submitted its report to the governor, the public would vividly remember that the Olubadan was not in the picture, because he was not invited.

    “The young and old in Ibadan know that the Ibadan chieftaincy system is not a creation of the government. It is a creation of Ibadan people. No king, no governor, no elite, no high chief has the right to tamper with the system without recourse to our people.

    “How many town hall meetings has the state government convened before arriving at the conclusion that Ibadan deserves 32 crowns? To show ignorance of our tradition, the panel lumped up our highly respected high chiefs with baales, who are always nominated by the family mogaji.

    “Secondly, if the traditional institution wants a review, it is not the duty of government to spearhead the review. It is the duty of the Olubadan-in-council to sit down and look at what they want to review and register same to the state government for approval.

    “In Ile-Ife, which the commissioner mentioned in the interview, this is the tradition. The Osun State government did not spearhead the review. In Lagos and Ogun states, the case is similar.

    “Besides, there are two cases in court on this same issue, which the Oyo State government is not unaware of.

    “Thirdly, you do not have to be a member of the Oyo State Council of Obas and Chiefs to know the creation of royalties and crowns is a matter for discussion and deliberation. So, the question is: how long ago has the council met? Therefore, it is an exercise in futility to embark on the creation of new crowns and royalties without first resolving these issues.

    “Besides, how many emirs are in Kano city, if you are talking of size and population? How many Sultans are in Sokoto? And how many queens are in England? Kabiyesi will not be able to attend the meeting called by the Ministry of Local Government and Chieftaincy Matters to discuss the issue slated for August 23 (today) because of a subsisting court order as Olubadan is a law-abiding citizen of Nigeria.”

  • Civil servants oppose jumbo severance benefits for Jonathan, others

    DISTURBED by the jumbo severance benefits of about N3.24 billion approved by the Presidency for political office holders, the Association of Senior Civil Servants of Nigeria (ASCSN) has urged President Goodluck Jonathan to reject the offer so that other beneficiaries can follow suit.

    In a statement in Lagos signed by its National President, Comrade Bobboi Bala Kaigama and the Secretary-General, Comrade Alade Bashir Lawal, the union expressed worry that despite  public outcry against financial recklessness and sharp practices that have been the bane of the Federal Government in the past   years, the Presidency still proceeded to approve sum of N3.24 billion as terminal benefits for political office holders whose tenure will expire on May 29, including legislators who were re-elected.

    ”This is a sacrilege and it is unacceptable in an economy where civil servants who serve the country for 35years or attain the age of 60 years are not paid any gratuity after service. We demand that all stakeholders in the Nigeria project must stand up now and oppose this financial recklessness’’ the union emphasised.

    The ASCSN argued that if President Jonathan and other political office holders including all  advisers and assistants collect such whopping terminal benefits, then, the incoming government of General Muhammadu Buhari must ensure that they return the money to the public treasury.

    It said it was inconceivable that  a situation where civil servants contribute their meagre salary to the Contributory Pension Scheme and receive no gratuity after many years of service to their fatherland, political office holders who serve for one to eight years and collect millions of naira monthly still award themselves such mouth-watering severance benefits.

  • Borno PDP stakeholders oppose substitution of Lawan’s name

    Concerned elders and stakeholders of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) in Borno State have kicked against the substitution of Alhaji Gambo Lawan as the party’s governorship candidate in the 2015 election.

    Lawan, a former Chairman of the Grassroots Democratic Movement (GDM) and ex-Chairman of Maiduguri Metropolitan Council, won the party’s governorship ticket at a primary in Abuja supervised by President Goodluck Jonathan.

    This followed the President’s intervention to resolve the lingering disagreement over the party’s governorship ticket in the state.

    The former GDM chairman and founding leader of the PDP in the state was affirmed by the party’s delegates and a Certificate of Return was issued to him after the election.

    In attendance during the primary were: Vice President Namadi Sambo, Senate President David Mark, PDP National Chairman Adamu Mu’azu, PDP’s Chairman of the Board of Trustees (BoT) Chief Tony Anenih, Borno State PDP Chairman, Minister of State for Power Muhammed Wakil, BOT members and other stakeholders from the state.

    But on the eve of the submission of all the parties’ governorship flag bearers to the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), Lawan’s name was substituted by the PDP National Chairman with that of Mohammed Imam, a nominee of Senator Ali Modu Sheriff.

    In an open letter to President Jonathan on December 26, the PDP stakeholders called for a reversal of the substitution in the interest of justice and fair play.

    The petition was signed by Aminu Yakudima, Ibrahim Abatcha and Salisu Aliyu.

    On the process that produced Lawan, they said: “The process and composition of the people present is first of its kind in the history of our great party, which Your Excellency described as the Supreme Court of the party whose decision is final. You may wish to recall further that Lawan, having emerged from the old PDP as the candidate, you directed the new entrants to the party to nominate the candidate for the deputy governor.

    “It is disheartening to note that 14 days after the nomination and affirmation of Lawan as the candidate, he was wrongly and illegally substituted with Imam on the eve of the closure for the submission of the governorship nominees to INEC.

    “We want to believe that Your Excellency is unaware of this ugly and sad development, particularly in a nomination process of this magnitude that was conducted by the highest office of the federation. In this regard and in the best interest of the party, we call for the immediate reversal of the decision to substitute Lawan.

  • Uduaghan: why I oppose capital punishment

    Uduaghan: why I oppose capital punishment

    •Okei-Odumakin honoured in Delta

    Delta State Governor Emmanuel Uduaghan has said he has refrained from signing death warrants for condemned criminals because of his belief in the sanctity of the human life.

    Uduaghan, who had opposed capital punishment, spoke at the weekend in Warri, the state capital, at a reception in honour of rights activist, Dr. Jeo Okei-Odumakin, and the inaugural lecture of LITE-Africa Leadership Institute.

    Represented by the Commissioner for Agriculture, Misan Ukubeyinje, the governor expressed confidence in the Judiciary to always deliver fair judgment.

    He extolled the virtues of Okei-Odumakin, adding that without the agitation of people like her, who stood against military dictatorship and civil rights abuses, he would not have become a governor.

    LITE Africa’s Executive Director Joel Bisina said the event marked a milestone in the organisation’s history.

    He promised to sustain the annual lecture, which attracted top personalities, including the academia, civil society groups, government functionaries, among others.

    According to him, the organisation places high values on leadership and persons who have served selflessly the needs of the society.

    He hailed Okei-Odumakin, adding that “society cannot be what it should be if the youth are not encouraged to promote social change”.

    Bisina said: “We are honoured to have her on LITE Africa’s board. Her life is what LITE Africa stands for. So, this event is our token, our own little way to appreciate somebody who has struggled for the betterment of the society.”

    The chairman of the occasion Femi Aborisade described the event as worthwhile.

  • Security agencies oppose being under Defence minister

    Security agencies oppose being under Defence minister

    Security agencies are opposed to President Goodluck Jonathan’s proposal to make the incoming Minister of Defence a Coordinating Minister of the military and security agencies.

    They said it was against the National Security Agencies Act 1986(as amended) to ask them to report to a minister, who might be a politician.

    The attention of the President was being drawn to the implications of having a Coordinating Minister of Defence who might be too powerful.

    The President has submitted a list of 12 would-be ministers to the Senate to replace those dropped last year.

    The nominees are: former National Security Adviser General Aliyu Gusau Mohammed (Zamfara State), Nigeria former Ambassador to Ghana Musiliu Obanikoro (Lagos), Hon. Mohammed Wakil (Borno), Abduljelili Oyewale Adesiyan (Osun), Ambassador Aminu Wali (Kano), Mrs. Hadjia Jemila Salik (Kano) and Mrs. Akon Etim Eyakenyi (Akwa Ibom).

    Others are: Laurencia Labaran Mallam (Kaduna), Dr. Tamuno W. Danagogo (Rivers), Asabe Asmau Ahmed (Niger), Mr. Boni Haruna (Adamawa) and Dr. Khaliru Alhassan (Sokoto).

    Senators have observed that nominees are greenhorns in public service.

    A few of them were also alleged to be old, implicated in some corruption deals.

    It was learnt that these dimensions have made Senators to resolve to put them to task on their antecedents and plans for the country because they have less than 17 months to spend in office.

    It was gathered that the concerns of the Senators border on “what changes the ministers are ready to effect” within a short time in office.

    Some senators were said to have been disappointed that ministers with issues had been in the cabinet.

    A high-ranking Senator said: “We will subject these nominees to serious screening because they are going to serve in a transition cabinet having been nominated in an election year.

    “We are no longer in the era of anything goes; we want to know what they want to do differently. If someone is already 70 or 75 years old and he wants to be a minister, we need to find out what value he intends to add to national development and how he missed the opportunity in his vibrant years.

    “We have received information about some people facing corruption charges and those mentioned by Wikileaks in the past. We need to clear these grey areas.”

    Another Senator said: “We are awaiting the circulation of the resume of the nominees most of whom are unknown to us. This has given us a challenge to conduct a thorough screening.

    “Some of us were disappointed that those, who should really be out of the cabinet have been retained.

    “On the surface, we saw the list as weak but since the nominees are unknown to most of us, they are Nigerians who might have achieved silently in their careers. We need to know them; Nigerians ought to have understanding of those who will lead them.”

    An opposition Senator said: “After a long wait, the President came with a suspicious list. It appears some of them are coming into the cabinet to run political errands.

    “It is not good to base cabinet selection on political sentiments because ministers serve the nation and not parties.”

    Meanwhile, security agencies are opposed to plans by the President to make them and the military to report to the in-coming Minister of Defence.

    A source, who spoke in confidence, said: “The National Security Agencies Act does not mandate these agencies to report to a Minister of Defence, who most often is a politician.

    “To realise the new proposal, the government would have to amend the Act or else we will be doing so illegally.

    “We should also avoid the danger of a Minister of Defence becoming powerful to assume the powers of the Commander-in-Chief.”

    Replying to a question, the source said: “I think the attention of the President has been drawn to the illegality of such a proposal.

    “In fact, the appointment of a Coordinating Minister for the Economy is unknown to law not to talk of the Coordinating Minister of Defence. Enough of illegality.”

    A copy of the National Security Agencies Act, obtained yesterday by our correspondent, reads in part: “For the purpose of co-ordinating the intelligence activities of the National Security Agencies set up under Section I of this Act, there shall be appointed by the President a Co-ordinator on National Security.

    “The Co-ordinator on National Security shall be a principal staff officer in the office of the President.

    “The Co-ordinator on National Security shall be charged with the duty of-

    (a) advising the President on matters concerning the intelligence activities of the agencies;

    (b) making recommendations in relation to the activities of the agencies to the

    President, as contigencies may warrant;

    (c) correlating and evaluating intelligence reports relating to the national security and providing the appropriate dissemination of such intelligence within Government, using existing facilities as the President may direct;

    (d) determining the number and level of staff to be employed by each agency established pursuant to section I of this Act and organising the transfer and posting of staff, especially the transfer and posting of existing staff of the Nigerian Security Organisation established pursuant to the Nigerian Security Organisation Act 1976, repealed by section 7 (1) of this Act;

    (e) doing such other things in connection with the foregoing provisions of this section as the President may, from time to time, determine.”

  • APC governors oppose autonomy for local govts

    APC governors oppose autonomy for local govts

    The policy position of the All Progressives Congress (APC) began to unfold yesterday as its governors opposed local governments autonomy.

    The governors also said the power to alter the revenue allocation formula, which is vested in the President, should be transferred to the National Assembly.

    The 11 governors met under the Progressive Governors Forum (PGF) in Lafia, the Nasarawa State capital.

    The House of Representatives voted for councils’ autonomy in the proposed amendment to the Constitution.

    Apart from host Governor Tanko Al-Makura, the meeting was attended by Governors Kashim Shettima (Borno), Kayode Fayemi (Ekiti), Rauf Aregbesola (Osun), Babatunde Fashola (Lagos), Abiola Ajimobi (Oyo), Abdulazeez Yari (Zamfara), Ibikunle Amosun (Ogun) and Adams Oshiomhole (Edo). Imo State Governor Rochas Okorocha was represented by his deputy Prince Eze Madumere. Yobe State Governor Ibrahim Geidam, who is away in Saudi Arabia for the lesser hajj, sent an apology.

    Fayemi read the communiqué of the meeting, saying: “The Forum commits itself to the process of APC party formation and consolidation, in line with the on-going efforts of the interim national leadership and with the understanding of the Progressive Governors Forum (PGF) as it affects the development of healthy relationship among the members of the APC.

    “The PGF discussed constitutional amendment extensively and resolved that the issue of Local Government Administration, recognising the fact that Federalism is the basis of our sovereignty, is a matter within the purview of the Federating Unit and every attempt to legislate by the National Assembly on any aspect of Local Government Administration will tilt the country towards a unitary state. This will undermine and weaken the fundamental principles of our federalism.

    “The Forum deliberated on revenue allocation and notes that in spite of recommendations made to the Presidency, no effect has been given to the extant proposals on the need to give more funds to the states and local governments because that is where the citizens reside.

    “The PGF further recommends that the powers to alter the revenue allocation formula currently with the Presidency should be vested in the National Assembly henceforth.

    Fayemi said the meeting also discussed a number of national issues in the on-going “dialogue to salvage the nation, proffer practical solutions on moving Nigeria forward as well as strategies to complement efforts of the interim national executives to strengthen the party” .

    The Forum praised the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) for rising to the occasion by registering the APC in the overall national interest.

    It, however, hoped that such “nationalistic and patriotic position of INEC” shall continue to guide its conduct with respect to its statutory mandate.

    The Forum expressed confidence in the interim national executive of the APC “in its on-going efforts to reposition the party as a credible alternative to the teeming Nigerians that are yearning for change”.

    Other decisions reached include: “The Forum condemns the killing of security operatives at Lakyo by the outlawed Ombatse militia and commends the Nasarawa State Government for the proactive steps taken in instituting a Judicial Commission of Inquiry with a view to bringing to book the perpetrators of this dastardly act.

    “The Forum condemns unreservedly the repression in Egypt, following the unconstitutional ouster of a democratically-elected government and calls on the International community to ensure speedy resolution of the crisis.”

    Elaborating on the position of the governors on council autonomy, Oshiomhole said: “We are in a federal system. The basis of our federation is the states, not local governments, and we are not going to reinvent the wheel in Nigeria.

    “To legislate on autonomy can be handled by state governments that believe in it. You can’t impose one drug that cures all ailments. The fact of our diversity itself suggests that it is better to allow certain issues to be dealt with at the level of state governments.

    “If Nasarawa State, for example, feels that it wants to give additional responsibilities to the local governments, the Nasarawa State House of Assembly should have the power to so legislate. That power should not reside in Abuja. That is the issue. Who decides what is the issue?

    “Abuja should not be the one prescribing one drug for every Nigerian ailment. We have Houses of Assembly and they are just as responsible as their counterparts in Abuja. That is the point we are making.”

    He added: “But I also want to say that too often we forget how we got to where we are. In the name of autonomy in the past, some local governments were unable or unwilling to pay salaries of primary school teachers, such that in some states’ teachers were not paid for about five months.

    “The result was that in those states, teachers were on strike endlessly. Part of the intervention now is to insist that local governments must give priority to the payment of primary school teachers’ salaries. If that means intervention, it is a progressive intervention.

    “So, autonomy is not an end in itself; it is about the purpose of autonomy and the character of that autonomy and you cannot be autonomous from your own people.

    “The Federal Government must recognise that we are in a federation. The Edo State House of Assembly can decide to legislate and give more powers, money and responsibilities to local governments. It has the power to do so. That power should not reside in Abuja. That is the point we are making.”

    Fashola, a Senior Advocate of Nigeria, urged the proponents of local government autonomy to reread their Constitution.

    He said: “I think the first thing to say is to identify with the position taken by the governor of Edo State. But perhaps as we discuss this, it is for us to understand the Constitution which guarantees a system of democratically elected local governments by laws made by the State Houses of Assembly for the purposes of ensuring that that system works.

    “It also provides that it is the states that create the local governments, first by holding a referendum, secondly by enacting a law and thereafter sending the list to the National Assembly.

    “Some of the things we are saying here is that remove that listing from inside the Constitution because if the local governments are created by the state, why should they seek autonomy from an agency or an institution that did not create them?

    “The parents should decide whether their children will go out at night and not to go and ask the neighbour next door to give them permission to enable their children go out at night.”

    Fayemi said:”We condemn unreservedly what happened in Borno State. We have been in Borno State in solidarity with our colleague there and the people of Borno State.

    “The responsibility that we have is not just to verbalise our abhorrence of what has been happening there. We also take other measures, like supporting the provision of relief materials and also working at various levels to insist on a security cum economic strategy that will ultimately put paid to this carnage going on in that part of the country.”

    On how the newly registered APC hopes to overome the rivalry among the merging parties, Fayemi said: “We don’t want to go into any defensive position about that. But you recall that in our statement we stressed one point: accommodation and tolerance of all interested parties who have joined in consummating this merger.

    “So, we are not going to go on a finger pointing spree. Those matters are still matters that we are consistently working on to provide accommodation. This is a process.

    “It is not an event and it is natural that it will take us time in order to fully bring everybody together. But what is clear is that there is no single party in this merger that is repudiating what has been done.

    “There may be local dynamics and local realities to the merger that we must respond and attend to on the ground and I can assure you that it is something that is going on in all our states.”

    Shettima added that the APC places premium on internal democracy.

    He said: “Another issue has to be internal democracy. In our party, we do not take every voice of dissent as treason. So, such disagreements are inevitable in a political process.

    “It is very much welcome but the most important thing is that we are determined to redefine the meaning and concept or modern governance in this country and we are going to change the face of politics in Nigeria.”

    Al-Makura said: “We have one goal, one mission and one vision and that is to salvage this country from the ruling party and also look at the avenue and vehicle for implementing these good policies, that is, through our own ideology, philosophy of social democracy which promotes social justice, transparency, accountability and the rule of law.”