Tag: Organisation

  • Organisation sets agenda  for presidential candidates

    Organisation sets agenda for presidential candidates

    A pan-Southeast professional group, the Concerned Nigeria Professionals and Entrepreneurs Forum, has suggested ten key issues that should form campaign topics for the presidential candidates in the general elections.

    They are particularly concerned about the candidates of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and the All Progressives Congress (APC).

    The group decried the current campaigns of mudslinging and name-calling, when according to the group, the nation was at a crossroads and had better things to do than engaging in campaigns of calumny.

    Convener of the group, Emeka Ugwu-Oju, who was in Enugu for the southeast zonal town hall meeting of the forum, told newsmen that the group believed that entrepreneurs were major stakeholders in Nigeria that is presently in a cross road based on the coming elections.

    “But we don’t want it to be a negative point for the country. So we are trying to redirect things, the campaigns are to be issues-based, and not on personal issues. The zonal town hall meetings are to reassess the issue to be announced to the presidential candidates at the national town hall meetings that will take place in Abuja on March 20, 2015 that will be attended by the presidential candidates, either as a debate or separately,” he said.

    Ugwu-Oju gave the summary of the ten key issues that should form presidential campaigns as: The fundamental change in the dynamics of the global oil market (guaranteed average low oil price for the foreseeable future) and the negative implication for a mono product economy; Restructuring/creation of a fair, just and equitable federation; Reduction in cost of governance at the federal, state and local government level; Transiting from an oil income sharing to a wealth creating economy.

    Others issues include: Climate change; Security of lives and property; Unemployment; Corruption; Food, water and housing and Education.

    He stated that it was clear there were enormous issues that bother the electorate, which require very clear and unequivocal discussion by the campaigns of the two major political parties that are presenting the two main presidential candidates, President Goodluck Jonathan and General Muhammadu Buhari (rtd).

    “These issues will be further distilled at the zonal town hall meetings and subsequently addressed by the presidential candidates at the national town hall meeting. On the question of the 2015 general elections, all we need to say is that, on no account should any Nigerian who is registered and willing to vote be disenfranchised because of inability to collect a PVC, whether card readers are deployed for the elections or not.

    “It is instructive, however, that if the elections had held as originally scheduled, on February 14, 2015, it would have been a disaster going by the recent experience with the test-run of the card readers. The case of what happened in Ebonyi state is a pointer to this fact,” said Ugwu-Oju.

    He noted that his group was of the opinion that if the electronic card readers cannot work as perfectly as it should work, INEC should better turn to option A4 so as not to disenfranchise any elligible voter.

     

  • Shift won’t save PDP, says Buhari campaign organisation

    Shift won’t save PDP, says Buhari campaign organisation

    Coordinator of the Lagos Office of the Buhari/Osinbajo Campaign Organisation, James Abiodun Faleke, has condemned the postponement of the general elections by six weeks as announced by Independent National Electoral Commission’s (INEC) Chairman, Prof Attahiru Jega.

    The INEC chair cited security reasons to justify the shift in the dates for the national election from February 14 to March 28 and the state election from February 28 to April 11.

    Faleke said the postponement could endanger the nation’s budding democracy and diminish the reputation of Nigeria in the comity of nations.

    Faleke, who chairs the House of Representatives Committee on Anti-Corruption, National Ethics and Values, accused those who are afraid of defeat at the polls as the architects of the postponement.

    His words: “We condemn this shift in election dates. It is a sad development and a dangerous signal to the growth of democracy in Nigeria. The time-table was released more than a year ago. Why is it that a week to the presidential and National Assembly elections, INEC is just announcing the postponement?”

    The lawmaker accused the ruling Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) of intimidating and blackmailing the electoral body into submission.

    “It is obvious that Nigerians will overwhelmingly reject the ruling party and its candidates at the polls. The Federal Government has seen the defeat of the party clearly and boldly written on the wall and it is now afraid of the rules it set for the game and decided to shift the goal post in the middle of the game,” Faleke said.

    He, however, stated that the PDP has only succeeded in pushing forward the doom’s day as six weeks cannot make up for the pains of six years. Nigerians are wiser and would not be fooled.

    “Let them postpone the elections. Nigerians are waiting for them. Nigerians are bonded in this struggle for change and they are determined to make it happen. Is it in six weeks that the PDP will correct the evils of 16 years?”

    “The plot is to weaken the opposition and give some respite for the ruling party. The PDP thinks the opposition will run out of steam because it is the only party that raised more than N20 billion to perpetuate itself in office.

    “What we are telling them is that the people’s will to effect a change is stronger than the federal might that the PDP has exerted INEC to shift the polls.

    “All agents of change must, however, remain steadfast and calm. They should avoid falling into the trap. The APC is determined to give Nigerians a new direction and a new lease of life from the rudderless leadership the PDP has offered for 16 years.”

    Faleke, who is the candidate of the APC for the Ikeja Federal Constituency, urged those who have gotten their Permanent Voter Cards (PVCs) to take advantage of the shift window to do so.

  • ‘Our organisation has empowered 600 women’

    ‘Our organisation has empowered 600 women’

    One organisation leading the campaign for women’s participation in governance is Women in Politics Forum (WIPF). In this interview with JOEL DUKU, the Forum’s founder, an ex-National Women Leader of Labour Party, Mrs Ebere Ifendu, speaks on, among other things, its challenges and successes. Excerpts:

    Why did you set up Women in Politics Forum?

    I initiated WIPF sometime in November 2011 at a programme organised by Women Democratic Network (WDM), International Republican Institute (IRI). So far, we have participated in the Constitution review and went to the House of Representatives and the Senate. We are hopeful that some of the things we presented will be taken from what the Constitution will come out with even though we are not expecting 100% but we are sure that some key issues there will be looked at. After that, we started our mentoring program. The young women that we have gathered here are from the Northeastern part of the country and after this session, we would have empowered 600 young women across the zones. We have also had the opportunity of bringing Smith Craig who is one of Hillary Clinton campaign strategists to Nigeria to talk to women aspirants. We have also plans with IRI to bring in an expert on fund raising from America to teach our women because we realised that funding is one of the major challenges that women face during electioneering.

    We have to get somebody to teach us how to get these funds and how they were able to do it there in the United States. We have plans sometime next month. We are also looking at launching our organisation properly but so far, our primary interest is to build the capacity of women. We have conducted series of programmes with the support of UNDP-DGD, IRI, women Trust Funds, and WRAPA. We also partner with FIDA and women in business. Most of the women in business are not interested in active participation in politics but they would want to see more women participate so we are talking to them to see how they will help us to sponsor such quality and credible women into politics. Generally, I can say that WIPF has done well within this short period and we are hoping to count our successes after the elections in 2015.

    What are the feedbacks from what you have done so far?

    The feedback has been very encouraging. Women are getting aware that there is an organisation like WIPF in existence. I receive calls from women across the country concerning our activities. Like the programme we are holding here, for instance, a woman aspirant called me yesterday from Niger State. I must commend the press for the visibility they are giving us and with more pressure and achievement we are putting in the system, the feedbacks are very good and we don’t expect to stop but to put in more energy immediately after the general election. We are looking beyond 2015. We want to start early because men have started long before us so we need to begin building our own structures to march the muscles of the men. We have to tell women who have interest in 2019 to start immediately after the 2015 election so that we put the necessary things together but I am not saying that we will not make an impact in 2015 but not as much as we would have loved to.

    What did you present to the National Assembly when you visited them?

    We talked about affirmative action for women. We talked about citizenship. A man that is married to a foreigner automatically confers on that woman a Nigerian citizenship but a Nigerian woman that is married to a foreigner cannot be in the reverse case. We talked about giving us at least one out of the three senatorial seats in the state.

    You want that to be enshrined in the Constitution?

    Of course, what is wrong with that? That is the only way we can achieve what we are asking for. We are talking about affirmative action today but it may be men tomorrow talking about it. When people criticise affirmative action, I give them just one example for instance, if I write an entrance exam with somebody from the North, I must work hard because even if my grade is 70%, I might still not get admission but if the northerner scores 30% he still gets admission. That is still affirmative action because we want to help them come up for the fact that they are seen as being backward education wise if we therefore understand that women have not been participating well in politics because of male dominance and we are struggling to come up now, what is wrong to also use affirmative action to bring up women.

    There should be a certain percentage for women representation at the House of Representatives as well. We are looking at the situation that in future, no gender should be less than 30% representation.  We also believe that independent candidacy will favour women. Most times, we have seen that it is the so called internal party politics that disenfranchise women. If you have these quality women who can stand on their own, they can as well stand as independent candidate and make an impact. I have noticed that some of those things that we discussed were being touched the last time when they were mentioning the constitutional review. We are therefore hoping that in the final amendment, some of our issues will be incorporated in the constitution.

    Apart from finance, what are the other challenges that women face in trying to get elected into political position?

    Apart from finance, genuine internal party democracy is very important. What you hear is that we have internal democracy but I have always challenged it because I don’t think it is existing in any political party in Nigeria today. Every political party in Nigeria is a culprit in this issue. I want to say that most times, these are the things the men use to disenfranchise women like zoning and what have you. We are not against zoning because we are talking about affirmative action but what we are saying is that can we also have it in a transparent manner? You will agree with me that when some of these decisions are being taken, women are not there from the beginning. The men will just take a decision and think it will suit us and most times it does not. They can’t decide for us. If they want to take a decision, they should get us involved to make our own inputs so that if we succumb to superior argument, you won’t feel disenfranchised or short-changed at the end of the day.

    We have also faced other challenges like acceptability, cultural and religious problems. But these are wrong interpretation because I have found out that women are more protected in Islam than in Christianity. Our problem here is lack of proper information and awareness. Because the women are not properly informed, they keep on toying them here and there. I have kept on asking this question how Benazir Bhutto made it to the highest political office in Pakistan, a complete Islamic country. She got the opportunity and she did well. I am sure that the religion is not against women but it is the psyche they are putting in our understanding and we are feeling shy to come out. Again, support from family. And I think the press is also not helping us by asking women questions about her family instead of asking her questions about what she will do when she gets into the office. When the press interviews a man, they ask him questions that will bring out the best in him unlike the women that would be asked: how would your husband and your children feel? How would you cope as a mother and so on? Men are also fathers so whatever hindrances we face within the family so if you have to ask us questions concerning our social life, men should also be asked the same questions and if you are giving them the opportunity to bring the programs they have, we should also be given same opportunities.

    How do you build trust across political parties in your organisation which you say is non-political?

    You see, we have all tried it within our political parties and failed completely. So we decided have we can do it in another way.  Women in Politics Forum is actually like a pressure group. It is not an affiliate of any political party. It’s open for not just women in politics but women interested in seeing more women participate in politics including organisations working towards that agenda which we regard as associate members of WIPF. Our role as an organization is to visit political parties and demand for more participation and positions for women.

     

     

  • Unethical practices that can ruin your organisation

    Unethical practices that can ruin your organisation

    On the scale of 10, how ethical is your organisation? Can you beat your chest to say your firm is actually making success? What about the employees in your fold and their personal ethics. Do they truly represent the organisation’s core values?

    Ethics is defined as a system of accepted beliefs and principles of conduct typically based on moral imperatives that govern the behaviour of individuals and the groups to which they belong.

    Here are six unethical practices that can ruin your organisation:

    • Bribery:

    Getting the biggest advertising account in town isn’t a stroll in the park neither is securing billionaires to save in your institution a child’s play. But the moment you make it a do-or-die your organisation is bound to tow the unethical part.

    One of such is offering bribes. A bribe subordinates the recipient to the donor. Inducing a process portends the organisation as unethical and soonest such enterprise will be in ruins.

    • Dishonesty:

    How true are you to customers and prospective buyers? Integrity is key when dealing with people. The moment you lose the confidence of your customers, the moment an organisation’s dwindling resources begin.  Being dishonest will only ruin your organisation’s reputation, which will be difficult to regain even with an Ivy Lee led PR team.

    •  Conflicts of Interest:

    Failing to give every bidder for a contract a level playing ground just to favour your relative, business partner and long time pal portends a conflict of interest. Conflicts of interest are unethical practices that pitch personal interests against the general good of the organisation. When such practices happen, a blink second is what it takes to ruin the organisation.

    • Unethical employee:

    Having in the fold employees that have questionable characters could be a stain on integrity of an organisation. An unethical employee translates to an unethical organisation. Employees make up an organisation so their morals, values and principles must be ethical.

    • Sexual harassment:

    Unwanted sexual looks and gestures, touching, grabbing and attempted rape are examples of sexual harassment. Sexual harassment has damaging impact on the victim and organisation.  Mostly sexually harassed are the women. Becoming known as a company that has a hostile environment for women will damage your brand.

    • Double standard employer:

    An employer of labour who desires an ethical organisation must be a leading leader. He must lead by example. Never must he be heard indulging in unethical practice. An employer is an influence on his employees and hence a promoter of ethical practice must he be. Employers should not only concentrate on creating structures and systems to guide employees’ behaviour but should also ensure that their personal conduct sets the standard for ethical behaviour.

     

     

  • Organisation offers tips on entrepreneurship

    Poised to aid economic development and support the improvement of business environment across the country, the Growth and Employment in States 3 (GEMS3), an initiative of the United Kingdom’s arm of the Department For International Development, DFID, has launched its inaugural Public Private Engagement Mechanism meeting.

    The event, which took place in Lagos, saw the coming together of key stakeholders from the government and private sector in a round-table session to discuss challenges faced by the private sector and proffer solutions for progress.

    While addressing the participants, the country project director of GEMS3, Dr. Layth Bunni said, “The aim of the meeting is to try and identify as well as create a deep understanding of why Nigerians in the business sector face the issues they encounter and find a way to come up with proper well-thought through solutions so that they can achieve long-lasting results.”

    Highlighting some of the successes they have recorded, Bunni said, “Most of the projects we have been able to pull through have been around the themes of taxation, land use and general investments by working with the State governments in harmonizing the laws and the implementation of these laws in a fair manner for everyone.”

    Also speaking at the event was the Director General, Lagos Chamber of Commerce and Industry, Mr. Mudu Yusuf, who gave insight on some of governments excesses as well as the impact of the recession on the Nigerian economy; “The problems faced by the average Nigerian trying to do business are cumbersome and are often caused by irregularities or non-implementation of government policies,” he said.