Tag: Osarenkhoe Afe

  • Court admits Oronsaye’s co-defendant’s confessional statement

    Court admits Oronsaye’s co-defendant’s confessional statement

    After about 12 months of denial, a Federal High Court in Abuja Monday out a lie to claim by the Managing Director of Federick Hamilton Global Services Limited, Osarenkhoe Afe that he was compelled to make confessional statements to investigators with the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).

    Justice Gabriel Kolawole, in a ruling Monday on a trial-within-trial conducted from June 21, 2016, held among others that Afe voluntarily made the statements, and proceeded to admit them in evidence.

    Afe is being tried with a former Head of Service to the Federation (HOSF), Steve Oronsaye on an amended 35-count charge in which they are accused of “stealing and obtaining money by false pretence” about N2billion.

    Shortly after their arraignment last year, Afe, through his lawyer Oluwole Aladedoye, objected to the admission, in evidence, Afe’s the statements, arguing that they were obtained from his client by “oppression”, a development that necessitated the conduct of the trial-within-trial, which began on June 21, 2016.

    The statements are confessional ones made by Afe to the EFCC on February 24, 2011 and March 16, 2011 in the course of investigating five companies – Hamilton Global Services Limited; Cluster Logistic Limited; Kangolo Dynamic Cleaning Limited, and Drew Investment & Construction Company Limited – alleged to have been used to perpetrate the fraud.

    Prosecuting lawyer, Oluwaleke Atolagbe called three witnesses to prove that Afe made the statements to EFCC’s investigators voluntarily.

    The witnesses, who were operatives on the EFCC’s Pension Task Force, testified to the effect that Afe made the confessional statements, and that “he was not coerced” into making them.

    Ruling yesterday, Justice Kolawole said: “The second defendant (Afe) was in a good state of mind when he made the statements.”

    The judge said if indeed, he was coerced into making the statements as claimed, he never took any steps, like writing “a letter of protest” and asking “the court to order the EFCC to produce the statement he was coerced to write.

    “If in the course of proceedings, there are new developments, which put the statement in great doubt; this court has the power to expunge it, as it is easier to do that, and I don’t have power to remove evidence that has already been objected,” the judge said.

    Justice Kolawole proceeded to admit the statements as exhibits in the case

    Earlier, the judge granted a motion brought by Oronsaye’s lawyer, Barth Ogar, praying the court to release his client’s international passport to enable him travel abroad for medicals.

    In granting the motion, the judge ordered Ogar to, in the next 48 hours, file a personal undertaking that the defendant shall return his passport on or before September 30 for purposes of his further trial.

    Justice Kolawole adjourned to October 12, 2017 for the “continuation of judicial trial of the defendants”.

    The EFCC, on May 18, 2016 re-arraigned Oronsaye and Afe before Justice Kolawole on the amended 35-count charge. Oronsaye, Afe, his company and other firms – Fedrick Hamilton Global Services Limited, Cluster Logistic Limitd, Kangolo Dynamic Cleaning Limited, and Drew Investment & Construction Company Limited – are named as defendants in the charge dated November 2, 2015’

    Count one of the charges reads: “That you Stephen Oronsaye, Abdulrasheed Abdullahi Maina (now at large) Osarenkhoe Afe and Fredrick Hamilton Global Services Limited on or about 2nd July, 2010 in Abuja, collaborated in disguising genuine nature of the sum of N161,472,000 derived from an illegal act to wit: conducting procurement fraud by means of fraudulent and corrupt act on the contract extension of biometric enrolment purportedly awarded to Innovative Solutions Limited by the Office of the Head of Service of the Federation without following due process and you thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 14 (1) (b) of the Money Laundering (Prohibition) Act, 2004.”

    Another count reads: “That you Stephen Oronsaye and Abdulrasheed Abdullahi Maina (now at large) between April and May 2010 in Abuja, collaborated in disguising genuine nature  an aggregate sum of N131,038,425 derived from an illegal act to wit; conducting procurement fraud by means of fraudulent and corrupt act on the contract of biometric enrolment purportedly awarded to Moshfad Enterprises by the Office of the Head of Service of the Federation without following due process and you thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 14 (1) (b) of the Money Laundering (Prohibition) Act, 2004.”

    The case was first taken before Justice Kolawole on July 13, 2015, where a 25-count charge was filed against Oronsaye and others, to which along with his co-defendants they pleaded not guilty. Before trial could commence before Justice Kolawole, the court’s Chief Judge, Justice Ibrahim Auta reassigned the case file to another judge, Justice John Tsoho.

    On March 1, 2016 when proceedings were to commence before Justice Tsoho, the judge stunned all when he said: “It has been realized that the case came to me in error, and I’ve been instructed that it should be returned to my brother judge, Justice Kolawole, who started it. He should continue where he stopped. I wish you the best of luck.”

    When parties returned to his court, Justice Kolawole said: “the Chief Judge wanted to redistribute cases to new judges transferred to the Federal High Court, Abuja in order to decongest the court, but this case file of Oronsaye was taken in error to Justice Tsoho. This explanation becomes necessary so the public will not be wondering why such back and forth movement.”

     

  • Oronsaye: Court dismisses claim of obtaining statement under duress

    Oronsaye: Court dismisses claim of obtaining statement under duress

    The Federal High Court, Abuja, has admitted as evidence the statements made by the second defendant, Osarenkhoe Afe, in the ongoing trial of former Head of Civil Service of the Federation, Stephen Oronsaye.

    Justice Gabriel Kolawale, admitted the statements at the conclusion of proceedings of a trial-within-trial, which he ordered.

    The trial-within-trial was ordered to ascertain the veracity of the claims by Afe that the statements he made to the EFCC were obtained under duress.

    Kolawale in his ruling said that more justice would be done by admitting the statements in evidence, adding that they were duly made and not involuntarily made under duress.

    “Based on my assessment of the events of Feb. 24 2011 and March 2011, the second defendant was in a good frame of mind when he wrote the two statements.”

    Kolawale wondered why Afe took no action against the EFCC when he was refused legal representation by its officials as he claimed.

    “I would have thought that he would request to see a senior officer, as a situation like this would have created a chain of facts.

    “Again when he was released on bail, he would have instructed his counsel to write a letter of protest to the Chairman of the EFCC that extra judicial statements were obtained from him by arm twisting tactics of his officers.”

    Kolawale, however, held that in the course of the trial, if additional facts emerged to prove that the statements were obtained under duress, the court had jurisdiction to expunge the statements from its records.

    He adjourned the matter until Oct. 12 for continuation of the substantive matter.

    Kolawale had ordered a trial-within-trial to ascertain the veracity of the claim by Afe that his statements were obtained by the EFCC under duress.

    When counsel adopted their addresses, Mr Oluwole Aladedoye, counsel to Afe, told the court that his client was abducted by EFCC officials.

    “I submit that the evidence before the court shows that there was no form of invitation to the second defendant by the EFCC, he was certainly abducted, no matter the nomenclature they choose to use.

    “No warrant of arrest was presented to the court and even the search warrant alluded to by the first prosecution witness was never presented to the court,” he said.

    Aladedoye also held that his client was denied his right to produce a legal representative of his choice, adding that there could be no greater form of oppression than this.

    He insisted that the statements made by his client to the EFCC were obtained under duress and prayed the court to discredit the statements since they were inadmissible.

    Counsel to the EFCC, Mr O.A. Atolagbe on his part, told the court that the two statements made by Afe had passed the admissibility test and prayed the court to admit them as evidence.

    On the allegation that Afe was abducted by the EFCC, Atolagbe held that the defendant testified that EFCC operatives came to his house and told him they were inviting him to their office.

    He added that the record of the court showed that the defendant said that he took his time to get dressed before following the EFCC officials.

    According to the counsel, the prosecution has established beyond reasonable doubt that the statements were made voluntarily and should be admitted in evidence.

    In another ruling, Kolawale granted an application by Oransaye for the release of his international passport to enable him travel abroad.

    He ordered that the passport should be released only after one of Oronsaye’s counsel, Mr Bart Ogar, file a personal undertaking that the defendant would return to face his trial.

    The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN), reports that Oronsaye is standing trial for money laundering, fraud and breach of trust.

    He is being tried with Afe and four companies – Fredrick Hamilton Global Services Limited, Cluster Logistic Limited, Kangolo Dynamic Cleaning Limited, and Drew Investment and Construction Company Limited.

  • How Oronsaye, others diverted N14bn pension funds – Witness

    How Oronsaye, others diverted N14bn pension funds – Witness

    Trial opened on Tuesday in the case against the ex-Head of Service of the Federation (HOSF), Steve Oronsaye and others before the Federal High Court, Abuja, with a prosecution witness giving details of how the defendants allegedly diverted 14billion pensioners’ fund using phoney names and contracts.

    This is the second case involving Oronsaye, as he is also being tried before Justice Olasumbo Goodlcuk of the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Maitama, Abuja, for allegedly exploiting his position as Chairman of the Presidential Committee of Financial Action Task Force (PCFATF), under President Goodluck Jonathan, to divert about N382.9m, using a secret account in Access Bank.

    Oronsaye, Osarenkhoe Afe and four firms are being tried before the Federal High Court on a 35-count charge of conducting procurement fraud.

    The firms are:  Fedrick Hamilton Global Services Limited (believed to be owned by Afe), Cluster Logistic Limited, Kangolo Dynamic Cleaning Limited and Drew Investment & Construction Company Limited.

    Testifying in the case before the Federal High Court, an operative of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), Rouqayya Ibrahim, gave details of how Oronsaye and others allegedly diverted states funds using about 66 illegal bank accounts.

    Ibrahim said Oronsaye and others effected the alleged diversion through payments to “ghost” pensioners and disbursements of funds for non-existing contracts.

    The witness said the defendants also engaged in payments of non-existing allowances to fake members of staff and to the National Union of Pensioners and Association of Federal Civil Service Retirees.

    Ibrahim was led in evidence by prosecution lawyer, Adebisi Adeniyi.

    She added that aside a company – Innovative Solutions Uptrach Communications Limited – which executed “a semblance” of a contract awarded, other firms were paid for non-existing jobs.

     

  • Oronsaye granted bail on self recognition

    Oronsaye granted bail on self recognition

    Former Head of Service of the Federation, Stephen Oronsanye and his co-accused in a N1.4billion fraud case, Osarenkhoe Afe, were granted bail on Tuesday.

    Justice Gabriel Kolawole, before whom they were arraigned on a 24-count charge, granted them bail after listening to arguments on their bail applications.

    While the judge granted Oronsaye bail on self recognition, Afe got his reprieve at N50million and two sureties in the same amount.

    One of the sureties must be a civil servant of Grade Level 16.

    The judge had, upon the accused persons arraignment on July 13 asked them to file formal bail applications and released them to their lawyers, who were asked to write an undertaken to produce them in court for hearing of their bail applications.

    While the lead prosecution lawyer opposed Afe’s bail application, he did not oppose that of Oronsaye because the judge was disposed to granting him bail having earlier released him after his arraignment.