Deputy governors at the meeting included those of Lagos State, Oyo State, Nasarawa State, Kebbi State, Rivers State.
Deputy governors at the meeting included those of Lagos State, Oyo State, Nasarawa State, Kebbi State, Rivers State.





A Coalition of Muhammadu Buhari Support Groups in Daura Emirate on Monday urged the All Progressives Congress (APC) to take steps to renew the joint ticket of President Muhammadu Buhari and Vice President Yemi Osinbajo towards the 2019 Presidential Elections.
The Groups led a rally to the entrance of President Buhari’s Daura residence in Katsina State, as the President continued to observe his Eid-el-Kabir Sallah break.
The procession was led by the Coliation Chairman, Arc. Kabiru Ahmad, who is the Executive Secretary of Lagos State Water Regulatory Commission.
Speaking on behalf of the coalition, the Secretary General, Alhaji Ismaila Daura, said that the Buhari administration has recorded achievements just midway into the tenure.
According to him, the Groups embarked on the procession to appreciate and glorify Allah for enabling the President overcome his health challenges successfully and returning safely to Nigeria.
Stressing that the rally was also to express solidarity and support to the President and his government for a job well done and to extend happy Sallah salutation to the President and his entourage.
He said: “It is our collective resolve now as patriotic Nigerians of the APC stock to call on the APC National Leadership to take concrete and serial steps to renew the Buhari-Osinbajo ticket.
“Surely, the APC is still the party to beat and has an extremely popular and sitting President in its kitty.
“As such the APC has all it takes to either be successful in the many elections to come or go on a complete sabbatical.
“However, we are confident that our patriotic party men and women shall always carry the day much to the benefit and delight of Mr. President,” he said.
The Groups praised the administration for the various achievements in good governance, security, war against corruption, improvements in power, transport, solid minerals and the agricultural sectors.


The Vice President, Professor Yemi Osibanjo has restated the commitment of the President Muhammadu Buhari’s led administration to support the Small and Medium Scale Enterprises in Abia and other states of the federation to grow the country’s economy in the face of the present economic challenges.
Osibanjo stated this while flagging off the Nationwide Micro, Small and Medium Enterprise Clinics for Viable Enterprises (MSME) in Aba, the commercial hub of Abia State.
The Vice President who described the SMEs as the highest employers of labour and engine house of every great nation’s economy said that President Buhari has great interest in the growth of the SMEs and stressed that it was the intention of the incumbent administration to make the industry to compete favourably and to even surpass their counterparts at the global stage.
He said that the essence of visiting Aba, Kano, Nnewi, Onitsha and any other parts of the country is to interact with the people, identify their problems and as well finding a lasting way to tackle some of the challenges that are hindering the SMEs from performing optimally.
“Mr. President gave two examples of how some of our agencies make it difficult for people to be able to register anything or do business and I think that everybody today understands that if we are talking about diversification of Improving our economy, it starts from those who are manufacturing, those who are doing local manufacturing. I am sure you know that the biggest employer of labour and the largest earning to our GDP comes from the local manufacturers and the local industries; that is how it is in everywhere in the world. Our focus is to support the local industry.
“I have seen all sorts of things today. I want to encourage those who are in manufacturing and industry to know that whatever that it will get you to do you business well and to become major competitors worldwide, that is exactly what we intend to do and that is why we are going round, we are making sure that we understand what the problems are so that we can be able to address all of those problems. We are looking forward to a greater Aba, an Aba that will compete with any of the industries that are established in China and any other part of the world.”
Earlier in his remarks, the State Governor, Dr. Okezie Ikpeazu said that the choice for Aba for the flag off of the MSME Clinics was apt and that Aba merited it.
Ikpeazu who hailed the resilience of Aba manufacturers and industrialists said that the state government was working assiduously to ensure that the goods of the SMEs produced in Aba will get the requisite certification to meet best global practices and standard.
Lauding the energy that the Aba manufacturers deploy in getting their wares produced, Ikpeazu said that he was excited that the efforts of the state government in promoting Aba made wares have been receiving acceptance and at the same time, getting the endorsement of the President of the country, Muhammadu Buhari.
The governor urged the manufacturers to be proud of what they produce, adding that the state government was building “a one-stop shop specifically to make businesses to excel” and promised that the state would be giving land freely to any agency of the federal government involved in the certification of locally manufactured goods that wishes to establish its office(s) in any part of the state.
If what federalism sets out to achieve is ‘individual and group rights defined in form of language, culture, and religion or socio-economic status’, the Yoruba by their history and temperament are federalists. Unfortunately, out of sheer mischief, the Hausa Fulani, who according to Richard Sklar settled for confederacy in 1953, (ostensibly because their region was 70 years behind the south in educational development and because of the south’s disrespect for their culture), and the Igbo and NCNC that opted for unitary system in 1959 (because of their mobility and educational advancement since they stand to gain more from a unitary system) have often turned around to accuse Awo and the Yoruba of tribalism for insisting on a workable federal arrangement.
A workable federal arrangement that will guarantee freedom, liberty and equality for every linguistic group from the unfriendly inhabitants of the Mama Hills and the unsocial Mumuye of Muri Province became a lifelong pursuit for Awo who once accused his political opponents of carousing around while he burnt the midnight oil proffering solution to Nigeria problems. He started his crusade with the publication of “Nigeria: Path to Freedom” as a student at the age of 36 in 1945.
As a 39-year old Yoruba representative at the 1948 Ibadan General Conference on the Review of the 1946 Richard’s Constitution, he canvassed vigorously for a federal structure based on ethnic nationalities as against the northern delegates’ insistence on a loose federation, with the centre controlling only Defence, External Affairs, Customs and the eastern delegates’ advocacy of a unitary system. Awo, accompanied by the late Alfred Rewane, his dependable ally and a pillar of Action Group took the crusade to Ahmadu Bello’s house in Kaduna. The meetings yielded no fruit because the Sardauna, according to Rewane reminded Awo that those whose freedom he sought were once his ancestors’ properties. Awo remained undaunted. Two other meetings were held at different times at the Ikorodu house of Alhaji Gbadamosi and in Awo’s Ibadan residence. Awo’s pursuit of freedom for the people of the Calabar, Ogoja and Rivers (COR Province), the Middle Belt and the North Eastern Nigeria, attracted little or no support from his Yoruba party members like S. L. Akintola, Bode Thomas and Rotimi Williams who did not mind confederation as canvassed by the north or any system for that matter as long as it guaranteed that the West was not ‘ruled by a one- eyed man king’.
At the 1958 Lancaster House constitutional conference where October 1, 1960 was announced as the date for Nigerian independence by the British Secretary for the colonies, Chief Awolowo was the only delegate that stood up to insist that independence for Nigeria as a corporate entity was not enough. “People of Nigeria”, he had argued, “must as individual citizens enjoy liberty, prosperity and equality under the law and Nigeria constitution”.
Probably as a result of the rivalry between Zik and Awo or out of envy for his unrivalled achievement in the West between 1952 and 1959, the Igbo ‘unitarists’ found a willing partner in the ‘confederal’ Hausa Fulani feudal lords desirous of protecting their fiefdom from contamination by Awo’s endless talk of freedom and liberty which partly precipitated the Tiv insurrection in early days of independence, to throw the advocate of freedom and justice into prison barely two years after independence. They labelled Awo a tribalist and coup plotter on the strength of an entry in his diary where he stated he had a dream that he became the Prime Minister of Nigeria. He was jailed for 10 years by political opponents who swore he would be too old if he ever survived his prison years to question how they govern Nigeria. Unfortunately, having removed one leg of the tripod, (AG in the West) the dispute over the 1963 census crisis between the east and the north which was settled in favour of the latter by the courts was all that was needed for the collapse of Nigeria’s edifice consuming in the process, most of those who had betrayed the spirit of the Nigerian constitution in 1962.
The coming of the military in 1966 was a continuation of the bitter war between the Igbo and Hausa Fulani political elite. Both President Azikiwe and Prime Minister Tafawa Balewa had made overtures to the military over the disputed 1964 elections. A segment of the military that was sympathetic to Zik and NCNC used the 1966 coup as a cover to clear out those who opted to support Balewa in deference to the constitution. The July counter coup and reprisal mindless killing of Igbos by northern soldiers was an answer to the January selective killing of non-Igbo political and military leaders. An ill-equipped and ill-educated military and their selfish Igbo and Hausa Fulani politicians later plunged the nation into an avoidable 30 months civil war (1967-1970), replaced a workable structure with an unwieldy 36 states and 776 LGAs. Igbo and Hausa political elite are the beneficiaries of the current anarchy which allows the almighty powerful federal government to undermine the authority of weak states through local governments. This and other calamities that befell our nation in the last 50 years could have been averted if we had not rejected Awo’s ‘Nigeria: Path to Freedom.”
Now for the first time in our nation’s history, the mainstream Yoruba political tendency embraced by Awo and his supporters is partnering with the Hausa-Fulani north to provide an alternative developmental paradigm to that which the coalition of Igbo and Hausa Fulani political elite had adopted since independence in 1960 to pilot the affairs of the country which has only left a legacy of thousands of underprivileged illiterate Igbo youths who roam the streets of our urban centres hawking substandard imported goods and their northern counterparts who according to Alhaji Kashim Shettima, became ‘victims of mass hunger and anger, mass unemployment, bad infrastructure, mass illiteracy and ignorance and general hopelessness’. Today, Osibanjo has an unenviable burden of working closely with Muhammadu Buhari who incidentally had restructuring in his manifesto in 2011 and 2015 to take us out of the woods after 50 years of rejecting the boundless possibilities contained in Awo’s “Path to Nigeria’s freedom’.
Osinbajo is starting where Awo stopped in 1962. Yoruba want for others what they want for themselves. His mandate from the Yoruba is therefore very clear and unambiguous. It is not about sharing offices. The Yoruba was after all, the worse for Obasanjo’s presidency. The Yoruba lost nothing conceding PDP Speakership of the current Lower House to the northwest. The Yoruba want a restructured Nigeria with constituents power over law and order, education and public information; a restructured Nigeria where there is freedom and justice for all; a restructured Nigeria that protects the right of indigenes as enshrined in the UN charter; a restructured Nigeria where it will be impossible to climb the palm tree from the top by becoming a President without representing anyone or making billions from allocation of oil block just because you claim to be a Nigerian.
It is restructuring that can end the orgy of killing of hundreds of helpless women and children at night in the Middle Belt region by unidentified ‘Fulani herdsmen’. Categorizing all forms of fraudulent activities ranging from the peddling of fake drugs to hawking of smuggled substandard goods as ‘business’ can only be stopped by restructuring. It is also the answer to corruption as there will be less to steal in Abuja while the government of South-south states especially Bayelsa where most of the state past chief executives have been accused by EFCC of converting over 70% of state allocations to personal use will be forced to face its own demon within a South-south zone or region or let off if the zone accepts President Jonathan’s thesis that ‘stealing government funds is not corruption’. Finally, it is the answer to Boko Haram who will be free to close down all schools and hospitals and revert to the cave age where services of doctors and engineers would not be needed.
I am sure Prof Osinbajo and Buhari, the president-elect have no illusion that their mandate or their capacity to confront the social problems facing the country is the answer to the structural problems that have bedevilled Nigeria since 1962. Their mandate and ultimate success in tackling social issues only provide a historic opportunity to study development in other societies such as India, Canada, Russia and even Europe and develop the political will to put an to the man-made structural problems bedevilling our nation since 1962.

Each village meeting concluded that Buhari is not coming back to rule as a representative of the military, should he get elected, but as a member of All Progressives Congress.
Finally, the All Progressives Congress (APC) has given the Nigerian electorate the other side of the electoral equation to consider in its search for the right presidential ticket to govern Nigeria in the next four years. Many APC members are already calling the Buhari-Osibajo ticket the ‘Dream Team’ to fix Nigeria. As expected in the marketing of candidates that electoral contest engenders, PDP spokespersons are quick in telling voters that this team is not formidable enough to unseat the incumbent. The interest of today’s column is to share reservations and recommendations of folks in many Yoruba towns and villages (which I had visited in the last four weeks) with regards to the two teams; one old and the other new, asking for citizens’ approval in the next presidential election.
On questions about the incumbent team, citizens did not have specific comments. They told me that they know enough about the Jonathan-Sambo ticket already, having had the two leaders in power for close to six months. They rather threw their own questions to me: “Are you sure Buhari can fix the country better than he did in 1984?” I answered that I was there to find out what they thought as voters, not to express my thought as a commentator wanting to feel the political pulse or temperature of the masses with respect to leading contenders for the APC ticket. I insisted that I was in every town or village visited in my personal capacity to listen to indigenes and residents, not to persuade anyone with my own feeling on the important matter of fixing Nigeria.
At a bar in Osogbo, one young man clad in a mechanic’s blue overcoat kicked off the discussion: “Should Buhari win the primaries, does anyone think that he will be in a position at 72 to fix Nigeria any better than what he did at 42?” Many okada riders in the room said between sips of beer that Buhari was too obsessed with unity and discipline in 1984 for him to be able to fix today’s more complex Nigeria. Others shouted them down that they were too young to know what happened in 1984 and should not waste the time of the visiting newspaper columnist by re-casting the prejudice of old UPN members. I quickly interjected, urging everyone to respect the view of the other and called for ground rules for the bar seminar. We all agreed in Osogbo as we did in Ipetu-Ijesa, Ile-Oluji, Ondo, Okitipupa, Inisa, Oyan, Ilese, Sagamu, Ikorodu, Ilorin, Offa, Ajase-po, Oyo, Fiditi, Ote, and for Lagos area in Ipaja, Festac, Alagbado, Mushin, and Ibafo. We agreed that each person would be allowed to air his or her views on each candidate and we would cast a vote at the end of each evening’s road-side political seminar on each issue discussed.
If votes recorded in the informal seminars were anything to go by, Buhari’s emergence in Lagos last week as the APC flag-bearer would not have surprised anyone in many of the bars visited. Most of the discussion in various towns was about his presidential candidacy. He was the candidate most favoured and also the most scrutinised. There was no session at which the issue of his need to explain why he made certain choices during the eighteen months he was military head of state. The negative questions were many: “Why did he stop the Lagos Metro Project; why did he keep UPN politicians in jail when nobody had accused them of stealing from public till; why did he ask citizens to wait in straight lines like soldiers at bus stations; why did he order that people who threw litters on the streets be flogged by WAI brigades?” One person in Okuku even asked why Buhari wanted to bring two leading southern UPN politicians; Dikko and Akinloye, back from London in crates to come and face trial for corrupt enrichment in Lagos. But there were older persons in the room who quickly put the last question to rest by saying that Dikko was Fulani like Buhari and that Akinloye was a leader of NPN, not UPN. One matter that came up in each session was the readiness of Buhari to do the needful: re-structure the polity and allow each region or state to develop at its own pace.
From one town or village to the other, the beer-parlour seminar was characterised at the beginning by boisterous discussions, but each ended on a sober note of philosophic reflection that many pundits would not associate with bar discussions. Many issues that could have been raised by PDP campaign managers were raised pointedly and not necessarily to damage Buhari’s campaign but to let him have the benefit of the interaction between the Yoruba political memory and electoral behaviour. One of such revelations was the point that a man’s deeds at 40 should not be used to disqualify him from any race that he joins at 70 and that thirty years should be long enough to change a man or woman that is not retarded. I was told by a clearly ‘lumpen’ group that doing something that made people uncomfortable thirty years ago is not as bad failing to grow with time to see things differently thirty years after, but that such leader must be ready to explain the reasons for his actions thirty years younger. A young woman, moving from serving beer to drinking Guinness stout, said: “It is the vision of the leader regarding the future that matters, not what he did not do to the satisfaction of everybody thirty years ago.”
I was told that Buhari in 1984 did not do anything with a mandate. Nigerians had no power over his choices of what to do, as he was responsible to his fellow military men who picked to replace Shehu Shagari, whom citizens voted for but who was apparently unable to govern the country properly while citizens who gave him their mandate to rule were also unable to call for his impeachment. Some blue-collar workers even said that Buhari was in 1984 a loyal member of a pack, the Nigerian military class, not a party with the overarching slogan of Change. The military-ruling class was described as one that from the beginning of military rule in 1966 to its end in 1999 made too many mistakes about how to fix Nigeria. Some persons even pontificated that if we are going to hold Buhari’s performances in 1984-85 against him, we should have done the same to Obasanjo who later came to govern Nigeria as a civilian president for eight years through the proverb: “Bawoni obo se s’ori ti inaki ko se?” (What is sauce for the goose should be sauce for the gander).
I also heard that voters should hold Buhari and his running mate down to electoral promises they are able to make. One woman said several times at the top of her voice that Buhari has been saying since 2007 that he would restructure the country if elected, an indication that he was not going to be satisfied with addressing the symptoms at the expense of the causes of Nigeria’s problems which have been festering for over half a century. Nobody knew at that point that Buhari was going to choose a running-mate, YemiOsibajo, who also spent so much of his legal mind defending and protecting the vestiges of federalism in place during his eight years of serving as Lagos State’s chief legal officer.
Soldiers in their one-dimensional thinking, one Danfo driver said, “misread the country’s political signs. They thought federalism was the enemy of the country’s unity and all of them in power worked hard to dismantle the country’s federal system, only to realise that the unity for which they broke the country into mini-states designed to survive on life support from petro dollars has remained elusive, even sixteen years after the exit of military rule. If the groups in the discussions were big enough to justify any generalisation, one would have paid substantial attention in this piece to a school teacher’s advice to Yoruba voters: “It is not enough to vote for Buhari and abandon him to his own devices; it is important to remind him at all times that he is the candidate of a party that in Yorubaland is seen as standing for Freedom for all, Life more abundant. Each village meeting concluded that Buhari is not coming back to rule as a representative of the military, should he get elected, but as a member of All Progressives Congress.
Lagos State Governor Babatunde Fashola (SAN), former Minister of Foreign Affairs Mr. Odein Ajumogobia (SAN), former Attorney-General and Commissioner for Justice in Lagos State Prof. Yemi Osibajo (SAN) and other notable Nigerians will on Friday in Lagos, discuss the life of Nigeria without oil.
Governor Fashola will be the keynote speaker at the lecture titled: “Life without Oil’, which forms part of the events marking the 30th anniversary of the law firm of George Etomi & Partners (GEP). The event will hold at Agip Recital Hall of Muson Centre, Onikan, Lagos.
A panel of persons from different fields of human endeavour will discuss the topic from their unique perspectives. The panellists include Mr. Ajumogobia, Mr. Bode Agusto, Mr. Atedo Peterside, Prof. Yinka Omorogbe and Prof. Osibajo.
The founder and Principal Partner of the firm, Mr. George Etomi will present a book: ‘An introduction to commercial law’, which gives a panoramic view of commercial law in Nigeria. The book, which is recommended for students and practitioners alike, contains about 600 pages of information to serve the readers well. Etomi was the pioneer Chairman of the Section on Business Law of the Nigerian Bar Association and is known to have contributed immensely to continuing legal education in Nigeria.