Tag: Oyegun

  • PDP faults Odigie-Oyegun’s position on Ekweremadu

    The Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) has faulted the position of the National Chairman of the All Progressives Congress (APC), Chief John Odigie-Oyegun’s position on the ongoing trial of the Deputy President of the Senate, Ike Ekweremadu.

    Ekweremadu is being tried alongside the President of the Senate, Dr. Bukola Saraki and two others over alleged forgery of the 2015 Senate standing rules.

    Odigie-Oyegun was quoted to have said that the emergence of Ekweremadu as Deputy Senate President rankled the APC, adding that the party found it very difficult to accept Ekweremadu’s emergence.

    In a statement on Tuesday, the spokesman of the caretaker committee of the PDP, Prince Dayo Adeyeye, described the trial as harassment of the accused persons.

    He also labelled the criminal charges against the principal officers as “phantom and shenanigan.”

    “We however, want to make it clear that the APC has no constitutional or moral grounds to be displeased with Ekweremadu’s emergence or to go this ridiculous length to harass, intimidate, embarrass, and malign him and the institution of the Senate on account of a position to which his colleagues, cutting across party lines, elected him in a transparent and televised election in line with Section 50 of the 1999 Constitution as amended,” Adeyeye stated.

    He recalled that the APC and President Muhammadu Buhari had commended the former Speaker of the House of Representatives, Aminu Tambuwal, when he defected from the PDP to APC in 2014 and still retained his position as Speaker.

    Adeyeye also recalled that the then National Publicity Secretary of the APC and the present Information Minister, Alhaji Lai Mohammed, had similarly hailed Tambuwal’s defection to the APC.

    Mohammed had gone ahead to described Tambuwal’s defection as “a balanced setting in government and democracy,” adding that the defection had the backing of history and the constitution.

     

     

  • OYEGUN:my years of struggle as labourer, hawker

    OYEGUN:my years of struggle as labourer, hawker

    National Chairman of the All Progressives Congress, Chief John Odigie-Oyegun, is reputed for prematurely retiring from the Federal Civil Service where he rose to the position of permanent secretary because he could not continue to tolerate the ills that were gradually creeping into public service. He went into private business and later became a politician elected as first executive governor of Edo State in the short-lived Third Republic. He later became an active member of the National Democratic Coalition (NADECO), the pro-democracy group that mounted pressure on the Gen. Sani Abacha-led junta to hand over power to an elected government. With the return to democracy, Oyegun decided to pitch his tent with the All Peoples Party (APP) which later transformed into All Nigeria Peoples Party (ANPP), one of the parties that coalesced to form the APC. He chose to remain in opposition for 16 years even though most of his friends and former political associates were in the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP). TONY AKOWE had an interesting encounter with the APC National Chairman, in which he told the grass-to-grace story of his life.

    Chief John Odigie-Oyegun, born to a man who was an only child, told The Nation that his father apparently wanted to compensate for being an only child, so he wanted his family name to be everywhere. Recollecting his growing up years in Benin, he said: “Growing up was lovely. It was a beautiful large family with a well educated father who worked with white judicial officers at the early stages, went on tours with magistrates at the time and all that. He was a court registrar, and whenever he was coming back, we were always happy because there would be lots of chicken and those little, little things. So it was fun because there were many children. We were 26 at the peak and that went relatively well.

    “Of course, in a situation like that, you tended to depend on your mother. They became the focus, the rallying point, and he (father) coped in spite of the large family. He was a one-child product of his family and I suppose he wanted to ensure that the family name lives forever. And I think he has succeeded because there are so many Oyeguns now all over the place.”

    Looking back into his early history, Chief Oyegun said even though his father was a well educated man who had a job, meeting all the family needs was not an easy task. So, most of the time, he had to rely on his mother for some petty needs.

    He said: “It was good even though there was not always enough to meet all our needs. He (father) paid our fees religiously and our mothers took care of the slack. You know, when you are going to school, the garri, sugar and all those things, you take along.

    “Of course, at that time, there was this tendency after secondary school to ask the female children to go into one of the professions whilst the male children struggled along. But what was good was that for many of us that went to the university then, we were basically on scholarship. So, it helped a lot.”

    At a tender age, Oyegun, who graduated from the University of Ibadan in 1963 with a degree in Economics, wanted to be a lawyer. But destiny had something else in store for him.

    He said: “I was preparing to go to the University of Hull in the United Kingdom to do a Law degree when my federal scholarship arrived and that immediately changed that possibility and my career path.

    “It was a beautiful time, and since there was not enough to meet all our needs, most of us the older ones took to supplementary occupations now and then just to earn some pocket money. Sometimes, we worked at building sites.

    “In those days, the scarcest commodity in Benin was water. With just a few taps in the city, you had to queue for a long time to get water. What we did was to work at building sites, more often than not filling drums with the water they used to mix concretes.

    “Occasionally, we hired trucks to carry things for market women. The third thing a lot of us did was selling. I sold soap. We put them in trays and went round town hawking. But it was quite a wonderful experience.”

    Oyegun had a distinguished career as a civil servant, rising to the position of Permanent Secretary at the age of 46, becoming one of the youngest Permanent Secretaries of his time. Quitting after about 22 years in service, Oyegun is not happy with the changes that have occurred in the service today.

    He summed up his civil service experience in just one wordfantastic. “Truly, there is nothing like it,” he said.

    “When you look back to those years and you look at what is happening today, you see a totally different world. At that time, you did not even dare go to your permanent secretary not to talk of discussing loot or lobbying for anything. That was an anathema.

    “I remember the very first position, I was left out. I wrote a petition in that regard and at the end of the day, I was called and told to take it easy, that I would be promoted when it was time, and that was the end of the matter.

    “During our time in service, you do not lobby for promotion. You do not lobby for posting or anything, and merit was very critical because it was highly recognised.”

    After his protest, luck smiled on him and he had the opportunity of working with some of the best leaders in the service.

    He said: “I had the singular fortune of being deployed, after my protest, to the Ministry of Economic Development where I had very enlightened leaders like Alison Ayida, I.D Ebong, one of the most forgotten now but one of the most intelligent civil servants of those days. And in many instances, I collaborated with Chief Phillip Asiodu and other very brilliant persons who were not in the ministry but collaborated a lot with us. These were people who encouraged you to reason; encouraged you to argue, encouraged you to speak your mind.

    “So, one grew up in that fearless mould but always reminded you that once a decision was taken, the issue was closed. Before the decision was taken, you could argue your point and they would listen to you, no matter how junior you were. So, it brought us up in a mould where we could speak fearlessly. There was no fear of witch hunt. In fact, it was a problem if you could not reason and you could not speak and you could not defend your point of view.

    “So, some of us, because of that kind of background, had problems much later in our career. But it was a fantastic civil service.

    “For instance, I got whispers about the possibility of me becoming a permanent secretary when I was attending a board meeting of the Nigeria Ports Authority (NPA), because you never knew things like that would happen. Somehow, somebody heard of it and called me out of the meeting to inform me. Just to give you the idea that at that time, the golden days of the civil service, merit was everything. Lobbying and corruption were absent. You dared not buy a car that was out of sync with your economic possibilities. It was not done. They would ask you.”

    Having had a flourishing career in the public service, Oyegun did not wait until he had attained the mandatory retirement age or number of years in service. He chose to disengage voluntarily.

    But why take such a decision when he had the opportunity of staying longer at the apex of his career?

    He said: “I retired voluntarily because the kind of upbringing we had in the civil service became a disadvantage when the military came in. For a long time, we had no problems, but I think there was a stress factor involved. When the Buhari administration with which I empathised a lot came in, discipline was becoming a problem. Corruption, drugs were becoming a problem. I was on all fours with that administration and when the coup happened and they were removed, I was truly upset. So in the usual forthright manner in which I grew up in the service, I said a few things and resisted a few things that created issues for me. So, I just knew it was time to go.

    When the new (Ibrahim Babangida-led) government came in, my problem started immediately, and I knew that by the time they would appoint permanent secretaries, it was almost certain I would not be on the list. So, I just said to myself, instead of facing that humiliation, I better just go whilst I was still on my feet.”

    So, while not waiting to be shown the way out, Oyegun took a decision he considered good for his future and left the service.

    After his retirement from the civil service, he was practically in the cooler for most parts of the Babangida regime until the doors of politics opened and he pitched his tent with the Social Democratic Party (SDP) on whose platform he was elected the governor of Edo State, defeating the more popular candidate of the National Republican Convention (NRC), Lucky Igbinedion, in an election that did not take money politics into consideration.

    Many who followed the election believed that if money had been allowed to play a major role, Oyegun would not have come near the Government House.

    What was the experience like for the former Edo State chief executive? He said: “It was lovely and beautiful. It taught me one thing and I think it is a universal truism, that when people trust you, when they believe you are acting in their own interest, they tend to take to you, and that was clear during most of my period in Edo State.

    “Then, almost like now, there was no money. I think we got less than N100 million most times in any month, because the last budget I presented was about N1 billion; the first time everybody was declaring billions. And that was for the entire year, and salaries almost took everything.

    “At the end of the day, you are left with almost nothing. At the best of times, I do not think we were left with more than N15 million or N20 million to manage the state in any month. But that is where resource management comes in.”

    In terms of liability, what did his government leave behind at the time they were eased out of office by the military?

    He said: “At the time I left, I owed nobody no salary. I owed nobody no pension; no lack of payment for work done. My habit from the time I became permanent secretary was that unless the money was there, I would not give out a job, because the effect is simple: people would go and borrow money to execute the job, then they come back after one, two, three months or even a year and you are unable to pay them. You have only ruined them, and for me, that was totally unacceptable.

    “So, unless the flow of resources was reasonably sure to me, I would not allow a job to be awarded. I had the challenge finally with the salary issue and I called the unions for a debate. I told them I did not want to lay off staff. They had just gotten one or two increments, that was during the Babangida regime when they would just virtually decree things. Two, three times, they reduced our percentage of the Consolidated Revenue funds while workers’ salaries went up.

    “So I called the workers and persuaded them to give up some of the increments they got, but repayable to them at retirement. We called it compulsory savings. I told them that would save their colleagues from being fired. The union leaders agreed.  But, of course, it turned out that they had difficulty persuading the workers. That was the issue we had. Otherwise, it was a most pleasurable experience.”

    How would he defend the argument that while in office as governor, he did not initiate new projects? He said: “When I came in, there were so many abandoned projects and I decided that instead of starting new projects, let me complete the ones that were there and bring them into use by the public because they had invested a lot of money in them and we could not just write them off.

    “The very day I was sworn in, I declared education free. So, when people today talk about free education being unaffordable, I do not understand it. I called the vice chancellor, rector, provost and heads of other tertiary institutions and asked them to tell me what each student paid into the system. They gave me the student population as well as how much they generate from them and I told them ‘fine, subject to increases everywhere, I will give you what the students are supposed to pay. So they are free to attend classes.’ And that was it. We managed that very well.

    “I introduced the public bus service and registered it as a limited liability company and we had an arrangement with those that were managing it. I would buy the buses, you would manage and maintain them properly and meet your recurrent costs, but I would always provide the capital. That worked very well.

    “When we needed to build a students’ hostel in what was then Edo State University, I called the students of Auchi Polytechnic and asked them to design it, do the architectural drawing. I called the students of the then Edo State University to supply the labour while we would supply the materials. We had to do these innovative things to succeed. It was a very lovely experience, such that till today, from the very first day I left office, I could walk the streets of Benin freely.”

    While working to put the new state on the path of development, his four-year tenure was cut short by the intervention of the Abacha junta thereby truncating the Third Republic after the annulment of the June 12, 1993 presidential election by the Babangida regime.

    To Oyegun, it was a very bitter experience. He told The Nation that he considered it a bitter experience not because his tenure was cut short, but “annoying as that was, it was a period of promise. You could see the future. The governors were mostly of high quality and we interacted very well and had a mission of where the country was going. Then, the military struck again and it became clear to me all of a sudden that the military was the source of the nation’s problems and that they had to be voluntarily or with a little push, be taken out of the political scene on a permanent basis. That was why NADECO came about. That was the mission of NADECO: an end to military rule.”

    But how did MKO Abiola come into the NADECO struggle?

    “June 12 was grafted when Abiola came to join us. We were meeting then somewhere in Ikeja GRA when Abiola applied to join and I remember I got up that day and said he had to accept that the core of the struggle was a permanent end to military rule; that we were ready to accommodate. Once we got the military out, we could cope with democracy with all its imperfections, but it was still a better option than military rule.

    “We fought till the end, won 50 per cent. We would have won 100 per cent but for the strange death of the dramatis personae. But we got the military out of politics with God assisting us in the process.”

    When it became clear that many of the leaders of NADECO which had become like an opposition to the military junta were either in detention or had fled the country, Oyegun knew that it was time to go into exile in order to survive to tell the story. It became worse when his name appeared among those that were wanted by the government.

    He said: “The minute I was declared wanted, the choices before me became very stark. We were bitter political enemies in Edo State. The late Aikhomu, for example, believed that I organised those who burnt his house and other attacks in Edo State, including the attacks on some leaders of the then NRC and those even within the SDP who became collaborators, not to talk of the political people that I defeated in Edo State. I was even in Lagos when all that happened.

    “So, it was clear that if I found myself in Benin Prisons, I might never come out alive. So, the choice became stark. The truth of the matter was that I went into hiding for quite a while and it became uncomfortable for those who were hosting me. Even for me, it became a bitter assault. And I contacted friends in the security services to say, ‘Look, I am tired of hiding. I’ll come out, stay in my house and I won’t say a word.’ And I was told, ‘Well, that may not be enough. You have to say you support us.’ And I told them, ‘Sorry, I will not do that. I am ready to keep quiet, but I am not ready to say I support you’.

    And it was a friend. So, he said, ‘Well, my advice is if there is any way you can get out for a while, please do so.’ That was how I went on exile.”

    Even though he has presided over a state which many believe to be stressful, Oyegun believes that the task of running a governing party is only tough, rough and stressful, but totally a rewarding experience.

    Asked to speak on his experience running the APC as its National Chairman, he said: “I did not know I still had so much to learn and I am still learning everyday. We were dealing with groups that had never held power at the centre. So, there was a little bit of inexperience.  Before we got into government, the vision was a lot clearer. The mission was definitepush out these people who are running the country. So, we all rallied around that single bannerget rid of the destroyers of our nationand we succeeded.

    “But once we succeeded, the issue of putting everyone in positions became problem number two. How do we fill the positions? Who is more important than who? Who occupies what position? Who are the most important groups in the party? What level of hold would they have on the structures? All those became divisive issues which, to be honest, we have not totally resolved up to this point in time, and which also gave rise to some of the problems that exhibited themselves in the National Assembly and places like that. But we are working on it. Distresses have come, but in the long run, people would start accepting the relative positions within the party, settling for what they have or what they can get, and the party would get into a more even state. But until people start accepting the realities that we need everybody on board, that influences within the party are to be shared relatively equitably, that all those who contributed majorly to the victory must feel an equal sense of belonging, an equal sense of ownership; once the individuals start accepting that it is not an all-or-nothing situation, this unfortunate problem that we have would recede to the background.”

    Retiring from service at an early age, having his tenure as governor cut short, being in the opposition for 16 years and watching the country drifting and now becoming the National Chairman of the ruling party, is he a fulfilled man?  He said: “As a human being, God has been generous to me. So, I am totally fulfilled. Many years ago, I looked at the lives of Awolowo, Zik, Papa Ajasin, Ahmadu Bello, Tafawa Balewa and the rest of them who contributed to the development of this country, but who on their death-beds felt a lot of frustration that the vision they had for the nation, we were not even yet on the road to realising them, and I said to myself, ‘God, I want to be on my death-bed knowing not that all the problems of this nation have been solved, but knowing that we are finally on the right path to greatness.

  • Nigeria’s future very bright, Oyegun assures

    Nigeria’s future very bright, Oyegun assures

    The National Chairman of All Progressives Congress (APC), Chief John Oyegun, says Nigeria’s future remains very bright.

    Oyegun, who spoke on yesterday at the Luncheon and Award programme organised by the University of Ibadan Alumni Association, urged Nigerians to persevere and be optimistic.

    The event was a follow-up to the third Public Service Lecture of the association entitled, “Change and the Nigerian Traditional Institution, “? delivered on at the weekend by the Obi of Onitsha, Nnaemeka Achebe.

    Oyegun said APC took over power when the economy was in bad shape, adding that there was need for complete overhauling of the system to initiate the desired change envisaged by the people.

    “The price of crude oil dropped drastically when we came on board.  Rather than a plastic solution, President Muhammadu Buhari took some sacrificial decisions to overhaul the entire system.

    “In the period of pregnancy, there is always pain. Buhari remains one of the few incorruptible Nigerians that can take sacrificial decisions and instill discipline.

    “Lack of discipline is one of the factors that brought our institutions to the prostrate state we met them. I have no doubt in my mind that the future is very bright,” he said.

    According to the News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) Oyegun was honoured with Alumnus of the Year Award while the publisher of the Sun Newspapers, Orji Uzor Kalu bagged the Entrepreneur of the Year Award.

    Among the 56 other awardees were Dr A.A.A Obiora, Dr Alex Izinyon (SAN), Chief Olu Falae, Chief Reuben Fasoranti, Chief Areoye Oyebola and Dr Michael Omolayole.

    Also speaking at the event, Gov. Abiola Ajimobi of Oyo State described Oyegun as a distinguished public servant as well as an accomplished economist and civil servant.

    Dr Kemi Emina, the National President of the UI Alumni Association (UIAA), described Kalu as a great entrepreneur, who is leading the youths through his entrepreneurial spirit.

    Emina thanked Oyegun and Kalu, who was represented by his Personal Assistant, Kunle Oyewumi, for their contribution to the development of the institution and the advancement of knowledge.

  • Kano killing: Oyegun,  El-Rufai urges open trial

    Kano killing: Oyegun, El-Rufai urges open trial

    National Chairman of the All Progressives Congress (APC) Chief John Odigie-Oyegun and the Governors of Kaduna and Buachi States, Mallam Nasir El-Rufai and Mohammed Abdullahi, have sought the open trial of culprits in the murder of Mrs. Bridget Agbaheme.

    At a meeting with the leadership of Ohanaeze Ndigbo, led by the President-General, Gary Igariwey, in Owerri, the governors insisted that those behind the crime must be brought to book.

    El-Rufai said the Northern state governors condemn the murder, adding that “we will not accept a situation where people, Christians or Muslims, hide under religion to commit crime. If someone insults God, he/she should be left for God to judge. I have advised the Kano State Governor to publicly deal with those involved to deter others”.

    Abubakar said: “The killing of Mrs. Agbaheme was an evil act. I have liaised with the Kano State Governor and he assured that arrests have been made and culprits will face the full weight of the law.”

    Chief Oyegun noted that the country has to face its challenges squarely, just as he lauded the leadership of Ohanaeze for their maturity in handling sensitive issues.

    Igariwey said he was satisfied with Kano state’s handling of the matter, even as he cautioned against inciting statements from leaders.

    He also praised the goodwill demonstrated by governors El-Rufai and Abdullahi.

    Governor Rochas Okorocha said the murder had nothing to do with tribe or religion, stressing that “what is criminal is criminal, and must be treated as specified by law.

    “With what the governors said, it could now be understood that the Kano incident was not an attack against Ndigbo, but a case of crime. Seventy per cent of Nigeria’s problems could be adjudged to have arisen from lack of communication. It is also pertinent for us to know that the wonderful bridge that connects the Igbo to the North is not faulty. The bridge is as strong as it has ever been. The Igbos must fortify this bridge for both economic and political reasons.”

  • Why subsidy was removed —Oyegun

    Why subsidy was removed —Oyegun

    The National Chairman of the All Progressives Congress (APC), Chief John Odigie-Oyegun, said yesterday that the government had to do away with the subsidy regime because it was evident that Nigerians were not benefiting from it.

    Odigie-Oyegun told reporters at the party national secretariat in Abuja that only  a few Nigerians who had manipulated the sector over the years were enriching  themselves from proceeds of the subsidy regime in the country.

    He appealed  for the  understanding of organised labour and their civil society allies, as well as the Nigerian public over the increase.

    He said that while Nigerians have a right to subsidy on oil, “the subsidy regime has become so intensely manipulated, so abused that it really was no longer operating in the interest of the Nigerian public.”

    “I think that it has become very clear that the kind of queues that has become endemic over several regimes in this nation is a clear indication that something has gone seriously wrong with the subsidy regime. Those who were privileged were exploiting it to amass more wealth.

    “Meanwhile, the people for who it is basically meant has to bear the cost in higher transport fare. Each time these queues develop, of course the ordinary Nigerian bears the cost, while the importers and manipulators of the system are the ones that make  all the money.

    “What the new regime is therefore doing is to ensure availability and having fuel at all, so as to prevent indecent queues at petrol stations has become something that is no longer desirable especially considering the fact that when you eventually get the fuel, it is already over priced.

    He added:”In any case, the current budget did not provide for subsidy and so, if the regim of subsidy is to be reintroduced, it can only divert resources from the crying needs of other sectors, including the programme to help the Nigerians living at the margin.

    “So, the appeal which is a very sincere appeal to the Nigerian people; yes there is a lot of hardship, yes increased pump price will also increase that hardship. But the economy is being freed in a way that the ordinary Nigerian will become the major beneficiary and we are talking of a matter of months from removing this one last bottleneck that has held the Nigerian economy down”.

  • APC raises panel to tackle division within party

    APC raises panel to tackle division within party

    The National Chairman of the All Progressives Congress (APC), John Odigie-Oyegun, said the party has set up a committee to resolve the skirmishes and division among party members.

    He spoke with State House correspondents at the end of APC Caucus meeting with President Muhammadu Buhari on Tuesday night.

    While pointing out that skirmishes among party members are normal, Oyegun said the challenges that followed past elections will soon be a thing of the past.

    He said: “Skirmishes among party members are normal. We have set up a committee that is looking into all those issues and will resolve those issues.

    “We discussed all the challenges that have occurred since the elections. And we decided on the way forward.

    “It was a very serious meeting that discussed serious issues that have to do with the progress of the party.”

    He went on: “Basically, we are expecting the budget to be out, and once that is done, implementation of our policies will start.

    “That is what we will use to deliver on our promises to the people. So we are waiting.

    “We don’t just recover money and spend it. We recover money and it will go into revenue, it will be deployed appropriately with the normal legislative approach.

    On the alleged suffering of Nigerians with about one year into the life of the administration, the APC chief said: “Don’t say one year into the present administration, count this year because this is the year we are presenting our budget and implementation will start.”

     

    He also dispelled speculations that his office was under threat.

  • Oyegun : APC NEC to hold next week

    Oyegun : APC NEC to hold next week

    •Party chairman resumes from leave

    All Progressives Congress (APC) National Chairman Chief John Odigie-Oyegun yesterday resume from a 10- day vacation with an assurance that the National Executive Council meeting of the party will hold as scheduled on Thursday March 24.

    The return of Oyegun to his office put to rest speculations that he might have tactically vacated the seat of national chairman due to pressure on him by some leaders of the party to quit.

    Oyegun said the party may have to look outside the North Central zone to produce the National Publicity Secretary for the party, pointing out that the challenge faced by APC was getting somebody who can handle the position like the former National Publicity Secretary, Lai Mohammed.

    Oyegun said: “I am glad to be back. I told you I was going on a break because I needed it. I’ve had a good break, I’ve had a bit of rest and I’m back to the office”.

    On the scheduled meeting of the various organs of the party that has failed to hold for a long time now, Oyegun said: “All the scheduled meetings of the party will run as planned, the caucus on March 21st, the BOT on the 22nd and NEC on the 24th. Everything will go as planned.”

    On the delay in appointing a National a Publicity Secretary for the party, he said: “I think arrangements have been completed to hold the necessary congresses to nominate the spokesperson. I think that should be done very shortly. In fact, the issue is getting somebody that can be as close as possible to the outstanding performance of the present Minister of information, Lai Mohammed.

    “I think that has been the issue. As a matter of fact, if it means making adjustments somebody who is good is priority number one and you can make adjustments subsequently.”

     

  • Oyegun hails Buhari’s cabinet

    Oyegun hails Buhari’s cabinet

    President Muhammadu Buhari has been praised for the quality of his cabinet.

    National Chairman of the All Progressives Congress (APC), Chief John Oyegun disclosed this while receiving the FCT Minister, Malam Muhammad Bello who paid him a courtesy visit at the national secretariat of the party.

    Oyegun reiterated that the calibre of people like the FCT Minister would surely take the Federal Capital Territory to enviable heights considering his pedigree.

    He lamented that the economy of the country was plunged into a sorry state by the previous governments, in addition to the down turn of oil price, which has remained the nation’s major source of revenue thereby making things very difficult.

    In a statement issued by the Deputy Director/Chief Press Secretary, Muhammad Sule Oyegun emphasised that if previous governments had diversified the country’s economy all these years, the situation would have been better today.

    The National Chairman commended the FCT Minister for the visit, saying it was quite energising to the party to rub minds with all stakeholders.

    Oyegun assured that the APC would work very closely with the FCT Minister and the entire FCT Administration to take Abuja to the next level.

    On the forthcoming FCT Area Council election, the National Chairman promised to support the FCT Chapter of the party to deliver the councils to the party.

    He, however, called for teamwork on the part of all Party faithful to ensure that APC comes out victorious in the elections.

    Speaking earlier, the FCT Minister, Malam Muhammad Musa Bello promised to work closely with the party in his efforts to deliver the desired Change Agenda of the Federal Government.

    While reminding the Chairman of the forthcoming Area Councils’ elections slated for March 19, 2016, Malam Bello called for the support of the Headquarters of the Party to FCT Chapter to ensure victory at the polls.

    He said, “We are also here to pay homage as loyal party men and to tap from the wisdom of its leadership which transcends several decades”.

     

  • Guber poll: APC waiting for court’s explanation on rulings – Oyegun

    Guber poll: APC waiting for court’s explanation on rulings – Oyegun

    The National Chairman of the All Progressives Congress (APC), Chief John Odigie-Oyegun, said on Thursday that the party is waiting for the Supreme Court to give reasons for its judgments in the governorship election cases in Akwa Ibom and Rivers States before knowing the way forward.

    Speaking when he received the party delegation from Akwa Ibom led by the governorship candidate, Umana Umana, Oyegun said the party will meet at a later date to fashion the way forward.

    “What is paramount is how to move forward on the situation that confronts us. We should reach conclusions that will guide us as a party in the months ahead,” he said.

    In his remarks, the governorship candidate, expressed shock at the Supreme Court judgment despite what he described as “overwhelming evidence” presented before the apex court confirming election fraud and violence perpetrated by the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP).

    He said both local and international observers, including the United States Embassy, the European Union and the Transition Monitoring Group (TMG) said the Akwa Ibom elections were marred by widespread irregularities and violence.

    He said: “Indeed we are not happy in Akwa Ibom State with the situation. Our people were not allowed to vote. It was not just a case of card readers, even the voters register proved clear cases of over voting. The EU, TMG and other international observer groups issued statements condemning the elections

    “Against this background, we thought if we approach the court, we will get justice. We submitted over 350 exhibits including video proving election violence and malpractices.

    “It was a case of double jeopardy. During the election our people were killed. We went to court and we could not get justice.”

     

     

  • Oyegun, Rivers poll and Supreme Court

    Oyegun, Rivers poll and Supreme Court

    Following hard on the heels of President Muhammadu Buhari’s complaint in Ethiopia about the headache he was having in aligning the judiciary with his anti-corruption war, the All Progressives Congress (APC) chairman, Odigie Oyegun, has given the Supreme Court his own spectacular broadside. The ruling party does not seem to mind that it’s rather trenchant views are beginning to look like a coordinated campaign against the judiciary. Speaking at a town hall meeting with Nigerians in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, last Sunday, President Buhari noted the stultifying effect the judiciary was having on his anti-graft war. “On the fight against corruption vis-à-vis the judiciary, Nigerians will be right to say that is my main headache for now”, the president was quoted as saying.

    He is not the only one to yield to exasperation and irritation over what they describe as deliberate imposition of judicial bottlenecks. Party chairman, Mr. Oyegun, was even more direct and unambiguous. Addressing party leaders from Rivers State who visited him in Abuja to complain of political and judicial developments in Rivers State, he had said: “The APC national leadership has not neglected party leaders and supporters in Rivers State. The state has always been in the front-burner of discussion and decision in the party. There is obviously something fundamentally wrong in Rivers State which needs to be investigated and addressed. Your visit has had a sober effect on me. This meeting will kick-start urgent actions to address what went wrong. As of today, there is an attempt being made by INEC to bar us from elections in Anambra and other states. We must address these issues. I still find the judgement on the Rivers State governorship election totally astonishing. There is something fundamentally wrong in the judiciary.”

    Not satisfied to just note what seemed to him a juridical anomaly in the Supreme Court’s ruling in the Rivers State governorship election petition, Mr. Oyegun emphasised that the court judgement was astonishing. By suggesting in the same breath that the situation in Rivers State would be investigated and addressed, it was taken by some critics, especially in the PDP, that he was referring to the Supreme Court judgement. He has denied he had the apex court in mind when he talked of investigation or probe. Of course he could not have had the court in mind. For, assuming that were the case, it would not be immediately clear what unprecedented steps he and his party could take to probe the judgement. Even though his statement did not directly refer to the apex court, by suggesting that the Rivers judgement was astonishing, and that something fundamental was wrong with the judiciary, Mr Oyegun may have needlessly courted and stoked controversy. This is because in many ways, unfortunately, the APC government has appeared to orchestrate some kind of pressure on the judiciary, blaming that third arm of government for everything that is amiss with the anti-graft war. This sort of pressure has never before been applied by any elected government in the history of Nigeria, certainly not even under the worst of governments — military, conservative or progressive. Notwithstanding these facts, Mr. Oyegun has promised the Rivers State chapter of the APC that their matter — and it is not clear what matter — would be investigated and addressed.

    If anyone thought what was uppermost in the mind of the APC chairman was jurisprudential anomaly or even his commitment to his party’s ideological conviction, they were grossly mistaken. Something else bothered him; and that thing was materialism, not political or legal altruism. According to Mr. Oyegun, “We have lost very important resource-rich states to the PDP. No matter how crude oil prices have fallen, it is still the most important revenue earner for the country.” Both the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), to which the APC has eventually lost Rivers at the Supreme Court, and the ruling party, which had won the petition at the Tribunal and Appeal Court levels, do their calculations in terms of rich and poor states. Somehow, they give the impression that much more than what they could do for and with the 36 states in Nigeria, they are propelled more by something much baser, something distinctly unedifying, something quite ordinary in measure, something uninspiringly in naira and kobo.

    Given the orientation of the APC leadership in Abuja, the future of democracy and the judiciary, more than at any other time in the country’s history, will be sandwiched between the president’s headache and the party chairman’s pecuniary projections. It is a future fraught with danger for the third arm of government, a future far more dangerous than they encountered even under military rule. For the APC chairman to talk unprecedentedly of something fundamentally wrong with the judiciary, perhaps because a few judgements went in favour of the opposition, indicates very clearly that he does not fully appreciate the implication of his statement both politically and judicially. Politically, it demonstrates that the APC could be regarded as a bad loser and an increasingly hubristic and intolerant party. Judicially, it suggests the ruling party is not bothered that its attitude to the judiciary could be construed as an indirect attempt to put unhealthy and inimical pressure on the courts.

    Mr. Oyegun will be the third notable personality in the ruling party to openly speak unflatteringly of the judiciary. The unlikely first person to do so was the Attorney General, Abubakar Malami, who alluded to the need to purge the judiciary of bad eggs in order to align it with the government’s anti-graft war. He had said: “As we may be aware, this administration promised Nigerians that it will promptly address the challenges facing our nation in the three areas of corruption, economy and security. Let no one be in doubt, the legitimate expectation of Nigerians in this regard shall be met. In this regard therefore, I am reiterating that the fight against corruption shall be total and will not exclude judicial officers, who are found wanting. After all, it is beyond doubt that a corrupt judge cannot meaningfully contribute to the fight against corruption. In reality, it cannot be over-emphasised that systemic corruption and impunity are prevalent in Nigeria, and that they cut across all sectors of the society, unfortunately, including the judiciary  an institution that is universally believed to be the hope of the common man.” Mr. Malami was criticised for his harsh view of the judiciary.

    The president himself also indicated that there were “allegations of judicial corruption…dilatory tactics by lawyers sometimes with the apparent collusion of judges to stall trials indefinitely thereby denying the state and the accused persons of a judicial verdict…and negative perception arising from long delays in the trial process that have damaged the international reputation of the Nigerian judiciary, even among its international peers.” After referring to the judiciary’s pace and style as the headache he was suffering in his anti-corruption war, it is not surprising that the APC chairman felt confident to speak of something fundamentally wrong with the judiciary. Clearly, the judiciary is in trouble.

    It is curious of Mr. Oyegun and damaging to the APC’s credibility that though the Supreme Court was yet to give reasons for the judgement in the Rivers case, party leaders have come to a conclusion that astonishing or fundamentally wrong things were happening in the judiciary. A significant number of Nigerians, more out of ignorance than anything else, are also exasperated with the judiciary. They complain of curious judgements, slow delivery of justice, undue and unnecessary adjournments, etc. But neither the complainants nor the grumbling and intimidating federal government has carried out an in-depth study of why the judiciary appears unresponsive to the demands of the moment. The judiciary has suffered appalling and disgraceful declining budgetary allocations over the past five years, and it is understaffed, overworked and poorly equipped. In most of the states, there is no financial autonomy, and virtually everywhere, prosecuting agencies nurturing secretive interests bungle cases so horribly that justice could not be served. Yet, inexplicably, all the problems are heaped on judges.

    The ruling APC appears sadly bent on whipping up emotions against the judiciary. This is counterproductive and unwise. If, as Mr. Oyegun suggests, the decisions of the Supreme Court in the Rivers case and perhaps other cases are astonishing, who will make it less astonishing? Retired justices? And if hypothetically, a few things are found amiss in any of the judgements, could it be established they were procured by financial inducement, political bias or plain incompetence? And even if any of these is established, who would reverse the decisions? The APC must measure its responses before they provoke a judicial crisis. The judicial reforms they speak so fluently about, but which they have not presented any concrete plan nor voted substantial money for, should precede their lust for blood. They must not create conditions where one day mobs of dissatisfied and agitated litigants and party faithful would storm the courts, eject judges and create a judicial and even existential stalemate for Nigeria.