Tag: Oyerinde

  • Oyerinde: Court acquits Ugolor

    A Magistrate Court sitting in Benin, yesterday discharged and acquitted renowned human rights activist and the Executive Director, Africa Network for Environment and Economic Justice, ANEEJ, Rev. David Ugolor in the alleged murder of Comrade Olaitan Oyerinde, slain Principal Private Secretary to the Edo State governor, Adams Oshiomhole

    Also cleared along with him was Wilfred Iserhienrhien who was alleged by the police of being in possession of some quantities of AAA cartridges without lawful excuses. The two freed men were accused of conspiracy, armed robbery and murder in the police case- No: MOR/326c/2012. They were both physically present in court as civil society activists from all walks of life and the media filled the court room and its immediate surroundings.

    Lead Counsel to Rev. David Ugolor and Wilfred Iserhienrhien, Barr Olayiwola Afolabi prayed the court to erase the names of his clients from the list of accused persons in the murder of Comrade Olaitan Oyerinde as the DPP report which was with the court had exonerated both men as there was no prima facie against them. He lamented that Ugolor had spent 41 grueling days in an unlawful detention over the matter.

    Delivering his ruling, Chief Magistrate Francis Idiake upheld the prayers of Afolabi and directed the unconditional release of Rev. David Ugolor and Wilfred Iserhienrhien in line with the DPP advice. “This is to reassure Nigerians that the judiciary remains the last hope of the common man. We all know you (Ugolor) as a human rights activist,” Idiake said.

    Other accused persons who were recommended for prosecution over the murder of Comrade Oyerinde by both the police and the Director of Public Prosecution (DPP) are: Garba Usman Maisamari, Muritala Usman, Moses Asamah Okoro, Auta Umaru Ali, Umaru Adamu, Wilfred Isrhienhi, Hassan Aliyu Babete and Idris Abdulhamid were not in court as they are still being remanded in prison custody.

    Usman Maisamari was the suspect used by the police to frame up Ugolor as the sponsor of Oyerinde’s murder.

    Shortly after the ruling, the jubilant crowd which thronged the court premises poured out celebrating with Rev. David Ugolor.

    “The Judge has confirmed that the police framed me up. Impunity by the police must stop, if not, the people might resort to violence,” Ugolor said.

  • Oyerinde: Court orders release of Ugolor, one other

    Oyerinde: Court orders release of Ugolor, one other

    A Benin Chief Magistrates’ Court on Thursday discharged and acquitted human Rights activist, David Ugolor, charged with the murder of Olaitan Oyerinde, Principal Secretary to Governor Adams Oshiomhole of Edo State.

    Also discharged and acquitted for the same offence is Willfred Iserhienrhien, who was charged along with Ugolor.

    The News Agency of Nigeria reports that Ugolor and nine others were brought before the court for alleged conspiracy, armed robbery and the murder of Oyerinde at his Ugbor residence on May 4.

    The court had consequently ordered their remand in custody, while waiting for the Director of Public Prosecutions’ advice.

    At the resumed hearing of the case on Thursday, Mr. Afolabi Olayinwola,counsel to Ugolor and Iserhienrhien, told the court that he was in possession of the DPP’s advice dated October 29.

    He said the advice stated that no prima facie case had been made against the accused persons, adding, “and by virtue of that letter, my clients have no case to answer.”

    Chief Magistrate Francis Idiake, who also acknowledged receipt of the DPP’s advice, said that he had taken into consideration the advice in the DPP’s report.

    Idiake said, “There is no prima facie case against the accused persons, it is hereby ordered that the accused persons be released from prison custody unconditionally.”

     

  • Oyerinde: Suspects to appear in court Thursday

    Oyerinde: Suspects to appear in court Thursday

    The suspects arrested in connection to the murder of Private Secretary to Governor Adams Oshiomhole, Comrade Olaitan Oyerinde, will on Thursday appear in court for commencement of trial.

    They were remanded in prison custody after the charges were read to them in September.

    The suspects are Garba Usman Maisamari, Muritala Usman, Moses Asamah Okoro, Auta Umaru Ali, Umaru Adamu, Wilfred Iserhienhi, Hassan Aliyu Babete and Idris Abdulhamid.

    Oyerinde was murdered at his Benin City residence on May 4.

    Chief Magistrate Francis Idiake had said the court lacked jurisdiction to entertain the matter and ordered that the case file be sent to the Director of Public Prosecution for advice.

    Thursday’s trial of the suspects will provide an avenue for the court to respond to the report of the Director of Public Prosecution (DPP) which exonerated the Executive Director, Africa Network for Environment and Economic Justice (ANEEJ), Reverend David Ugolor, from Oyerinde’s murder.

     

     

     

  • Oyerinde: DPP exonerates Ugolor, others

    Oyerinde: DPP exonerates Ugolor, others

    Security agencies might not have arrested the killers of the Private Secretary to Governor Adams Oshiomhole, Comrade Olaitan Oyerinde following the advice of the Director of Public Prosecutions to the Oredo Magistrate Court.

    Chief Magistrate Francis Idiake had on August 31 ordered that the police case file on the suspects arrested in connection to the murder of late Oyerinde be sent to the DPP for advice.

    The DPP in a letter addressed to the Inspector General of Police and dated October 29 said two of the suspects, Danjuma Musa and Muritala Usman, have been in police custody since April 24 for unlawful possession of cartridges.

    It said FCID interrogated the suspects who later confessed to the murder of Olaitan that took place on May 4.

    This, it said was “evidently incongruous.”

    The DPP in the letter signed by Ade Irehovbude said the cut to size gun and one cartridge the suspects confirmed was used for the operation at Olaitan’s residence was recovered on April 24 by the Esigie Police Division.

    The letter said, “This is alleged to be a weapon used during the robbery incident that took place on May 4, 2012. Another incongruity. Could a weapon recovered and in possession of the police be confirmed by suspects to have been used for the commission of the offence?”

    The DPP, however, advised that a prima facie case of conspiracy to commit armed robbery and murder be made against Garba Usman Maismari, Auta Umaru Ali, Moses Asamah Okoro and Usman Adamu who confessed to the crime.

    It also said a prima facie case of receiving stolen property be made against Hassan Aliyu Babete and Idris Adulhamid who both made confessional statements.

    On Rev. David Ugolor, the DPP said no prima facie is made against him and ordered him to be released if still in custody.

    It said the confession of an accused person was not admissible evidence against a co-accused.

    Responding, Rev Ugolor said the police had no reason for arresting him apart from Maismari’s evidence which was used to frame him up.

    He said, “We have come to a glorious end of the battle to enthrone justice in my case and I thank God almighty who used great citizens to fight oppression in this country.

     

  • We didn’t kill Oyerinde – Suspects

    We didn’t kill Oyerinde – Suspects

    The suspects arrested by the State Security Services on Thursday said they were tortured and “promised many things” to admit to the killing of Private Secretary to Governor Adams Oshiomhole, Comrade Olaitan Oyerinde.

    Oyerinde was killed on May 4 at his Benin City residence at about 2am.

    The three suspects spoke to Journalists shortly before they were arraigned before an Oredo Magistrate Court.

    They said they had participated in several robberies but were not involved in the killing of Olaitan.

    The suspects are Raymond Dregbo (24), Edeh Chikezie (32) and Mohammed Ibrahim.

    Raymond said, “They beat me to say what I didn’t do. I didn’t go to Oyerinde’s house. I don’t know his house. I took them to the house we robbed where we collected N48, 000 and I got N8, 000. We didn’t shoot anybody there. They are holding us for robbery but we didn’t kill Oyerinde.”

    The second suspect, Mohammed, said he was arrested along Water Resources and that the SSS promised many things for them to admit to killing Olaitan.

    He said it was his personal phone that the SSS paraded as Olaitan’s and that the gun also paraded was not theirs.

    “I admitted because of the dehumanising treatment they gave us. We later discovered that what they were saying about us didn’t concern us.”

    Presiding Magistrate, Edo Asemota, ordered the suspects remanded in prison custody and requested that the case file be duplicated and sent to the Directorate of Public Prosecution for advice.

     

  • Police / sss quarrel over probe of Oyerinde’s murder

    The recent controversy between the Nigeria Police and the SSS in the investigation of the murder of Mr Oyerinde, the former principal private secretary of the Edo State Governor Adams Oshiomole, is unfortunate and uncalled for and has given rise to this write up.
    The two sister organisations are creation of statutes whose duties and/or functions are clearly stated in the enabling laws establishing them. By way of historical recapitulation, before 1976 internal security in Nigeria was the sole responsibility of the “E” Department of the Nigeria Police Force. The “E” Department was also known as the Special Branch of the Nigeria Police Force.
    But on the 24th day of March, 1976 the then Federal Military Government under General Olusegun Obasanjo promulgated Decree No.16 of 1976 establishing the Nigerian Security Organisation – the N.S.O – with responsibility for all aspects of security in Nigeria – within and without. With the advent of that decree the Nigeria Police Force was divested of all responsibility concerning internal security.
    Then in 1986, the military government of General Ibrahim Babangida promulgated the National Security Agencies Decree No.19 of 1986. That decree scrapped or disbanded the former Nigerian Security Organisation- the NSO – and in its place created three separate security agencies each charged with responsibility for specific aspect of security. That decree is now known as the National Security Agencies Act Chapter N74 Laws of the Federation 2004.
    Under this Act, there are three bodies or agencies charged with responsibility for various aspects of national security. They are as follows:-
    • The Defence Intelligence Agency
    • The National Intelligence Agency and
    • The State Security Service (SSS)
    See Section 1 of the Act.
    Their functions are as follows:-
    The Defence Intelligence Agency
    a. The prevention and detection of crime of a military nature against the security of Nigeria.
    b. The protection and preservation of all military classified matters concerning the security of Nigeria both within and outside Nigeria.
    c. Such other responsibilities affecting defence intelligence of a military nature both within and outside Nigeria, as the President or the Chief of Defence Staff, as the case may be, may deem necessary. See Section 2 (1) of the Act.

    The National Intelligence Agency
    a. The general maintenance of security of Nigeria outside Nigeria, concerning matters that are not related to military issues, and
    b. Such other responsibilities affecting national intelligence outside Nigeria as the National Defence Council or the President, as the case may be, may deem necessary. See Section 2(2) of the Act.

    The State Security Service
    a. The prevention and detection within Nigeria of any crime against the internal security of Nigeria.
    b. The protection and preservation of all non-military classified matters concerning the internal security of Nigeria and
    c. Such other responsibilities affecting internal security within Nigeria as the National Assembly or the President, as the case may be, may deem necessary. See Section 2(3) of the Act.
    Of particular significance also is the provision of Sub-section (4) of Section 2 of the Act which states as follows:-
    “(4)-The provisions of sub-section (1), (2) and (3) of this section shall have effect notwithstanding the provisions of any other law to the contrary, or any matter therein mentioned”
    From the above Section 2(3) of the Act it is crystal clear that the main function of the SSS is the Internal Security of the country by intelligence gathering.
    Although the National Security Agencies Act Cap N74 Laws of the Federation 2004 did not define the phrase “Internal Security”; the Blacks Law Dictionary 5th Edition at page 732 defined “Internal Security” as follows:
    “Internal Security. That branch of law and government (e.g. CIA, FBI) dealing with measures to protect the country from subversive activities.”
    The question that arises from the above definition of the phrase “Internal Security” is whether the offence of “murder” being investigated by both the SSS and the Police qualifies as “Subversive Activity.”
    It is submitted with respect that going by the definition of the phrase “Subversive Activities” the common crime of the offence of “murder” does not qualify as one. See the definition of the term by the Blacks Law Dictionary 5th edition at page 1282 as follows:-
    “Subversive Activities- acts directed toward the overthrow of the government including treason, sedition and sabotage”.
    From the foregoing provisions of the National Security Agencies Act Cap N74 Laws of the Federation 2004 and from the Black Laws Dictionary definition of “Internal Security”, it is very clear that the functions of the SSS is solely targeted at internal security of Nigeria and not the investigation of common crime like murder, no matter how heinous the common crime may be. Under the Nigerian laws that function belongs to another statutory body – the Nigeria Police Force – as will be seenanon.
    Section 214 (2) (b) of the 1999 Constitution as amended provides as follows:-
    “214(2) (b) – the members of the Nigeria Police Force shall have such powers and duties as may be conferred upon them by law”
    Alsoby virtue of Section 4 of the Police Act Cap P19 Laws of the Federation 2004 the general duties of the Police can be stated as follows:-
    “Section (4) – The Police shall be employed for the prevention and detection of crime, the apprehension of offenders, the preservation of law and order, the protection of life and property and the due enforcement of all laws and regulations with which they are directly charged, and shall perform such military duties within or outside Nigeria as may be required of them by, or under the authority of, this or any other Act.”
    It is submitted, with respect, that reading and construing Section 2(3) of the National Securities Agencies Act Cap N74 Laws of the Federation 2004 which stipulates the functions of the SSS and Section 214(2)(b) of the 1999 Constitution as amended and Section 4 of the Police Act Cap P19 Laws of the Federation 2004 which stated in eloquent terms the duties of the Nigeria Police Force, it is hugely doubtful whether such ordinary crime as “murder” or even “assassination” can be said to fall within the purview of the functions of the SSS.
    It is submitted with respect and without fear of contradiction that the murder of Mr. OlaitanOyerinde the former principal private secretary (PPS) to the Edo State Governor, Adams Oshiomole cannot by any stretch of the imagination be said to amount to an act bordering on internal security. It is purely a simple case of “murder” which should be handled by the Nigeria Police Force on the authority of Section 4 of the Police Act which assigns to the police the duty of prevention and detection of crime. The SSS could be described in this matter as a meddlesome interloper!!
    In the days of yore the SSS never struggled for recognition nor sought public attention neither were the officers seen parading suspects before klieg lights.
    Secret agents worldwide, like officers and men of the SSS, are known to operate covertly and discretely shunning publicity, but operating incognito.
    Under Section 2(3) of the National Security Agencies Act Cap N74 it is the responsibility of the SSS to feed the police and other sister services with the result of their covet operation for necessary action.
    The SSS should allow the IGP and the Police to do their job andconcentrate on issues like the Boko Haram and other internal security challenges and not engage in murder investigation.
    What Nigeriansexpect from the SSS and the Nigeria Police Force is absolute co-operation in the discharge of their duties, not unnecessary and unhealthy rivalry.
    Each agency should confine itself to the duties assigned to it by the constitution andthe enabling laws.
    God bless Nigeria!!
    Dated the 7th day of September, 2012

    The recent controversy be
    tween the Nigeria Police and
    the SSS in the investigation of the murder of Mr Oyerinde, the former principal private secretary of the Edo State Governor Adams Oshiomole, is unfortunate and uncalled for and has given rise to this write up.
    The two sister organisations are creation of statutes whose duties and/or functions are clearly stated in the enabling laws establishing them. By way of historical recapitulation, before 1976 internal security in Nigeria was the sole responsibility of the “E” Department of the Nigeria Police Force. The “E” Department was also known as the Special Branch of the Nigeria Police Force.
    But on the 24th day of March, 1976 the then Federal Military Government under General Olusegun Obasanjo promulgated Decree No.16 of 1976 establishing the Nigerian Security Organisation – the N.S.O – with responsibility for all aspects of security in Nigeria – within and without. With the advent of that decree the Nigeria Police Force was divested of all responsibility concerning internal security.
    Then in 1986, the military government of General Ibrahim Babangida promulgated the National Security Agencies Decree No.19 of 1986. That decree scrapped or disbanded the former Nigerian Security Organisation- the NSO – and in its place created three separate security agencies each charged with responsibility for specific aspect of security. That decree is now known as the National Security Agencies Act Chapter N74 Laws of the Federation 2004.
    Under this Act, there are three bodies or agencies charged with responsibility for various aspects of national security. They are as follows:-
    • The Defence Intelligence Agency
    • The National Intelligence Agency and
    • The State Security Service (SSS)
    See Section 1 of the Act.
    Their functions are as follows:-
    The Defence Intelligence Agency
    a. The prevention and detection of crime of a military nature against the security of Nigeria.
    b. The protection and preservation of all military classified matters concerning the security of Nigeria both within and outside Nigeria.
    c. Such other responsibilities affecting defence intelligence of a military nature both within and outside Nigeria, as the President or the Chief of Defence Staff, as the case may be, may deem necessary. See Section 2 (1) of the Act.

    The National Intelligence Agency
    a. The general maintenance of security of Nigeria outside Nigeria, concerning matters that are not related to military issues, and
    b. Such other responsibilities affecting national intelligence outside Nigeria as the National Defence Council or the President, as the case may be, may deem necessary. See Section 2(2) of the Act.

    The State Security Service
    a. The prevention and detection within Nigeria of any crime against the internal security of Nigeria.
    b. The protection and preservation of all non-military classified matters concerning the internal security of Nigeria and
    c. Such other responsibilities affecting internal security within Nigeria as the National Assembly or the President, as the case may be, may deem necessary. See Section 2(3) of the Act.
    Of particular significance also is the provision of Sub-section (4) of Section 2 of the Act which states as follows:-
    “(4)-The provisions of sub-section (1), (2) and (3) of this section shall have effect notwithstanding the provisions of any other law to the contrary, or any matter therein mentioned”
    From the above Section 2(3) of the Act it is crystal clear that the main function of the SSS is the Internal Security of the country by intelligence gathering.
    Although the National Security Agencies Act Cap N74 Laws of the Federation 2004 did not define the phrase “Internal Security”; the Blacks Law Dictionary 5th Edition at page 732 defined “Internal Security” as follows:
    “Internal Security. That branch of law and government (e.g. CIA, FBI) dealing with measures to protect the country from subversive activities.”
    The question that arises from the above definition of the phrase “Internal Security” is whether the offence of “murder” being investigated by both the SSS and the Police qualifies as “Subversive Activity.”
    It is submitted with respect that going by the definition of the phrase “Subversive Activities” the common crime of the offence of “murder” does not qualify as one. See the definition of the term by the Blacks Law Dictionary 5th edition at page 1282 as follows:-
    “Subversive Activities- acts directed toward the overthrow of the government including treason, sedition and sabotage”.
    From the foregoing provisions of the National Security Agencies Act Cap N74 Laws of the Federation 2004 and from the Black Laws Dictionary definition of “Internal Security”, it is very clear that the functions of the SSS is solely targeted at internal security of Nigeria and not the investigation of common crime like murder, no matter how heinous the common crime may be. Under the Nigerian laws that function belongs to another statutory body – the Nigeria Police Force – as will be seenanon.
    Section 214 (2) (b) of the 1999 Constitution as amended provides as follows:-
    “214(2) (b) – the members of the Nigeria Police Force shall have such powers and duties as may be conferred upon them by law”
    Alsoby virtue of Section 4 of the Police Act Cap P19 Laws of the Federation 2004 the general duties of the Police can be stated as follows:-
    “Section (4) – The Police shall be employed for the prevention and detection of crime, the apprehension of offenders, the preservation of law and order, the protection of life and property and the due enforcement of all laws and regulations with which they are directly charged, and shall perform such military duties within or outside Nigeria as may be required of them by, or under the authority of, this or any other Act.”
    It is submitted, with respect, that reading and construing Section 2(3) of the National Securities Agencies Act Cap N74 Laws of the Federation 2004 which stipulates the functions of the SSS and Section 214(2)(b) of the 1999 Constitution as amended and Section 4 of the Police Act Cap P19 Laws of the Federation 2004 which stated in eloquent terms the duties of the Nigeria Police Force, it is hugely doubtful whether such ordinary crime as “murder” or even “assassination” can be said to fall within the purview of the functions of the SSS.
    It is submitted with respect and without fear of contradiction that the murder of Mr. OlaitanOyerinde the former principal private secretary (PPS) to the Edo State Governor, Adams Oshiomole cannot by any stretch of the imagination be said to amount to an act bordering on internal security. It is purely a simple case of “murder” which should be handled by the Nigeria Police Force on the authority of Section 4 of the Police Act which assigns to the police the duty of prevention and detection of crime. The SSS could be described in this matter as a meddlesome interloper!!
    In the days of yore the SSS never struggled for recognition nor sought public attention neither were the officers seen parading suspects before klieg lights.
    Secret agents worldwide, like officers and men of the SSS, are known to operate covertly and discretely shunning publicity, but operating incognito.
    Under Section 2(3) of the National Security Agencies Act Cap N74 it is the responsibility of the SSS to feed the police and other sister services with the result of their covet operation for necessary action.
    The SSS should allow the IGP and the Police to do their job andconcentrate on issues like the Boko Haram and other internal security challenges and not engage in murder investigation.
    What Nigeriansexpect from the SSS and the Nigeria Police Force is absolute co-operation in the discharge of their duties, not unnecessary and unhealthy rivalry.
    Each agency should confine itself to the duties assigned to it by the constitution andthe enabling laws.
    God bless Nigeria!!
    Dated the 7th day of September, 2012