Tag: Palestinians

  • Palestinians, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, UK, others reject Trump’s plan to ‘own Gaza Strip’

    Palestinians, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, UK, others reject Trump’s plan to ‘own Gaza Strip’

    World leaders and Palestinian authorities have rejected United States President Donald Trump’s plan to elongate his takeover list as he shared his wish to ‘own’ war-ravaged Gaza Strip.

    The Arab countries, who are also U.S. allies, as well as United Kingdom, Australia, New Zealand, Spain France, Germany and others have rejected the proposal of relocating the Gazans to other countries while the war-torn state is rebuilt.

    Trump made the remarks on Gaza during a joint press conference in the White House with visiting Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu standing beside him.

    He also suggested that the U.S. develop the land but gave no details on who would be allowed to live there.

    He proposed that all Palestinians currently living in Gaza — around 2 million people — should leave and be placed in other countries in the Middle East.

    But, the Palestinian Authority said it has categorically rejected Trump’s proposal to relocate the residents of the Gaza Strip.

    Read Also: How bad is Nigeria?

    Palestinian President, Mahmoud Abbas, said the Palestinians will not relinquish their land, rights and sacred sites, and that the Gaza Strip is an integral part of the land of the State of Palestine, along with the West Bank and East Jerusalem.

    “The Palestinian leadership affirms its firm position that the two-state solution, in accordance with international legitimacy and international law, is the guarantee of security, stability and peace,’’ Hussein al-Sheikh said.

    Al-Sheikh is the Secretary-General of the executive committee of the Palestine Liberation Organisation (PLO), wrote on X yesterday.

    Hamas, which sparked the war with its October 7, 2023 attack on Israel, said Trump’s proposal was a “recipe for creating chaos and tension in the region.”

    Islamic Jihad declared that “Trump’s positions and plans are a dangerous escalation that threatens Arab and regional national security, especially in Egypt and Jordan, which the U.S. administration wants to put in confrontation with the Palestinian people and their rights.”

    The two-state solution provided for Israel and a Palestinian state to coexist as independent states.

    The Palestinian leadership “affirms its rejection of all calls for the displacement of the Palestinian people from their homeland.

  • Dozens of Palestinians killed in humanitarian zone near Khan Younis

    Dozens of Palestinians killed in humanitarian zone near Khan Younis

    Israel issued new orders to displaced people to evacuate parts of a crowded humanitarian zone in Gaza yesterday, following what it said were renewed attacks by Hamas militants operating out of those areas.

    The Israel Defence Forces (IDF) made the order for an eastern part of Khan Younis in the southern Gaza Strip, where Israel estimates at least 1.8 million Palestinians are taking refuge.

    A leading Hamas military commander in Gaza had survived multiple Israeli attempts to kill him, but they may have finally gotten their man — now all they need is evidence.

    An altered mugshot shows the mysterious Hamas military commander Mohammed Deif, who is known as The Guest.

    Medics in Gaza said Israeli forces opened fire immediately after the evacuation call, killing at least 37 Palestinians near the city.

    Civilians were killed by tank salvos in the town of Bani Suhaila and other towns just east of Khan Younis, which was also bombarded by air, authorities said.

    The IDF said its strikes were aimed at militant targets in Khan Younis and the nearby area of Al-Mawasi, a humanitarian zone blanketed with tent camps that lack sanitation and medical facilities, which has been attacked many times since October.

    Read Also: GM food controversy: Health Minister summons NAFDAC, NBMA bosses

    Gaza’s health ministry said the dead included several women and children and that dozens of other people had been injured. The Hamas-run ministry does not distinguish between militants and civilians in its death tallies.

    About 400,000 people are living in the targeted areas, and dozens of families began to leave their houses yesterday, Palestinian officials said, adding they were not given time to leave before the Israeli strikes began.

    short because of disagreements over terms between the combatants, who blame each other for the impasse.

    Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu left on a much-anticipated trip to the United States yesterday to meet with President Joe Biden, who on Sunday said he would not seek another term, and address Congress.

  • The world fails Palestinians, again and again

    The world fails Palestinians, again and again

    • By Alade Fawole

    Palestinians are unquestionably the most hapless people on earth and have been so since the state of Israel was created in Palestine in 1948. Not only were they slaughtered on an industrial scale in the aftermath of the Second World War to make room for Israelis to return for the creation of the state of Israel, but they have since then been subjected to the most brutal mix of colonial-apartheid domination, the kind that South Africans know so well. The Gaza Strip, that narrow space between the Mediterranean Sea and Israel, where two and half million Palestinians are consigned, is “the largest open air concentration camp” in the history of the world and are subjected to the most inhuman treatment by successive Israeli governments that see them as sub-human species qualified for extermination from the face of the earth.

    Lamenting what he calls “the moral failure of Western institutions on Gaza,” in a piece published in Eurasia Review of November 7, Palestinian journalist and writer Ramzy Baroud asks in understandable exasperation: “so, what is the use of the elaborate international political, humanitarian and legal systems if they are unable to stop or even slow down a genocide that is being aired live on TV screens all across the world?”

    By Western institutions, he is referring to the multitude of international institutions created since end of WWII to address and resolve critical international issues. The most consequential of these international organizations created ostensibly “to save succeeding generations from the scourge of war, which twice in our lifetime has brought untold sorrow to mankind” is the United Nations. 

    Its central purpose as stated in Article 1 of its Charter, is “To maintain international peace and security, and to that end: to take effective collective measures for the prevention and removal of threats to the peace, and for the suppression of acts of aggression or other breaches of the peace, and to bring about by peaceful means, and in conformity with the principles of justice and international law, adjustment or settlement of international disputes or situations which might lead to a breach of the peace.” 

    To answer Baroud’s question, I will contend unequivocally that these “elaborate international political, humanitarian and legal systems” did not fail on Gaza. They were created ab initio, solely for the pursuit and satisfaction of the selfish interests of the great powers only, and not what their charters or constitutions make us believe! They are simply not configured to resolve international problems except as it pleases the great powers only. It is pertinent to understand that these international bodies, from the UN, its organs and agencies, and international financial institutions, the WTO, international law, ICC, etc. are all set up to do the biddings of the great powers and also serve as mechanisms for them to impose their will on and bring the lesser members of the international system into perpetual subjection.

    Read Also: Israeli airstrikes displace 264,000 Palestinians in Gaza – UN

    Big powers are outside the reach of international law. That is the cruel reality we must all learn to accept. To imagine anything different is to wallow in absolute self-delusion. Why, for example, are the great powers that helped create the International Criminal Court not subject to its jurisdiction? Why do the great powers recklessly engage in trade practices that are detrimental to the interests of the small states despite the elaborate prescriptions in the World Trade Organization rules? Most of US vetoes in the UNSC have been in defence of Israeli positions and interests. Israel is the proverbial tail that wags the big dog, gets the US to do its bidding always.

    Like it or not, our world is still a world of power, and as I have stressed in previous articles, the big fish still eats the small fish while small fish eats worms. Thucydides’, the historian of the Peloponnesian War, famous quote never ceases to ring in my ears anytime I am engaged in international relations analysis. According to him, “Right, as the world goes, is only in question between equals in power, while the strong do what they can and the weak suffer what they must.” It is a world where the strong and powerful are never held accountable for their misdeeds, where the justness or otherwise of an action in international relations is rarely settled on points or dictates of the law but on power, and wherever brute power holds sway, morality and justness take a back seat.

    What about international law, you would ask: it is those who hold power that make and enforce laws, period. Might is always right. And that’s the way it has been throughout history. That’s why the United States wilfully and without provocation or justification invades, bombs and destroys weak countries, slaughters thousands in foreign lands, impose killer sanctions on them, simply because it can, and also will get away with it. 

    Dear Ramzy Baroud, that’s precisely why Israel also would conduct genocidal campaigns against innocent and defenceless Palestinians in Gaza on live television – because it possesses the brute military power and would never be held accountable! Not even the UN can do anything about it. Israel not only thumbs its nose at the UN and whatever is called international law but even arrogantly and magisterially demanded the resignation of the Secretary-General. For what crime or offence, you might ask? Simply, because he voiced the truism that the world already knows: that whilst Hamas’ October 7 horrific attacks on Israel is condemnable, “it is important to also recognize the attacks by Hamas did not happen in vacuum.” In response, Israel’s foreign minister, furiously justifying Israel’s genocide, not only refused to meet with the Secretary-General, but instead cold-heartedly asserted that “there is no room for a balanced approach, Hamas must be erased from the world.”

    Pray, who will call Israel to order when those who have arrogated to themselves the right to be the custodians of world order are complicit in encouraging the ongoing war crimes – relentless slaughter of children, women, the aged and infirm alike in their homes, on the streets, in schools, hospitals, churches and mosques a mindless orgy of violence.

    Has the world failed Gaza? Yes, spectacularly so! And that’s because the rest of the world is powerless to do anything beyond mere expression of moral outrage at the horrific genocide being perpetrated in Gaza. As for the great powers, Israel can do no wrong; it has their backing for the barbarous ethnic cleansing without consequences. In fact, the US is complicit in that the horrendous genocide being carried out with American-supplied weapons and money, as well as American political and diplomatic backing. Who then is going to hold Israel and the US accountable? Hypocritically, America will rail and rant against what it terms Russia’s unprovoked war in Ukraine and ensure that Russian president, Vladimir Putin is indicted for war crimes before the ICC, a court whose jurisdiction the US does not itself recognize. How just is that? Well, justness in world politics is always a one-sided decision: the powerful decide what is fair and what is foul, what is to be accepted and what is not acceptable. The heart bleeds for Palestinians.

    • Prof Fawole writes from Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife
  • Indonesia warns Australia over possible Jerusalem move

    Indonesia, the world’s largest Muslim-majority country, on Tuesday warned Australia that moving its embassy to Jerusalem could undermine a peace process between Israel and the Palestinians.

    Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison said that his country was “open’’ to shifting recognition of Israel’s capital to Jerusalem while still being committed to a two-state solution.

    Indonesian Foreign Minister Retno Marsudi said she had conveyed her country’s opposition to such a move to Australia.

    “Indonesia encourages Australia and other nations to continue to support the peace process and not conduct any action that could undermine the peace process and global security,’’ she said after talks with visiting Palestinian Foreign Minister Riyad al-Maliki.

    Indonesian Foreign Ministry spokesman Arrmanatha Nasir declined to comment on a report by Australian broadcaster ABC that Jakarta was considering putting off a trade deal due to be signed soon with Australia on hold over Morrison’s comments.

    Read Also: Indonesian islamists accuse Facebook of discrimination

    Morrison said no decision had been made to move Australia’s embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, but he said arguments in favour of such a move were “persuasive’’.

    He said there had been no discussion on the matter with the U. S., which had already moved its embassy to Jerusalem.

    Indonesia had also criticised the U.S. embassy move and warned that it would threaten the peace process.

  • Israeli soldiers kill 12 Palestinians in Gaza protests

    No fewer than 12 Palestinians were killed and several hundreds wounded by Israeli forces during protests in Gaza.

    It was one of the worst days of violence in recent years.

    Late in the day, Israel’s military targeted three Hamas sites in the Gaza Strip with tank fire and an air strike after what it said was an attempted shooting attack against soldiers along the border that caused no injuries.

    Protesters, including women and children, had earlier gathered at multiple sites throughout the blockaded territory, which is flanked by Israel along its eastern and northern borders.

    Smaller numbers approached within a few hundred metres (yards) of the heavily fortified border fence, with Israeli troops using tear gas and live fire to force them back.

    Israeli security forces also used a drone to fire tear gas toward those along the border from overhead in one of the first uses of the device, a police spokesman said.

    The health ministry in Gaza reported 12 Palestinians killed by Israeli forces throughout the day. More than 1,200 were wounded by various means including tear gas, it said.

    Palestinians accused Israel of using disproportionate force, as did Turkey.

    Israel’s military alleged that the main protests were being used as cover by militants to either break through the border or carry out attacks.

    “It is not a peaceful demonstration,” an Israeli military official told journalists.

    “There was no small number of attempts to damage the fence and cross” the border, she added.

    The army said it estimated some 30,000 demonstrators were taking part in the protests.

    It said that “rioters are rolling burning tyres and hurling firebombs and rocks at the security fence and at (Israeli) troops, who are responding with riot dispersal means and firing towards main instigators.”

    – ‘Playing with your life’ –

    Protesters were demanding hundreds of thousands of Palestinian refugees who fled or were expelled during the war surrounding Israel’s creation in 1948 be allowed to return.

    Hamas leader Ismail Haniya attended the protest, believed to be the first time he had gone so close to the border in years.

  • Trump urges Israel to ‘Be very careful’ with building settlements

    Trump urges Israel to ‘Be very careful’ with building settlements

    U.S. President Donald Trump has called on Israel to “be very careful” with building settlements in West Bank as this issue complicates the opportunity to continue with the peace process.

    “The settlements are something that very much complicates and always have complicated making peace, so I think Israel has to be very careful with the settlements,” Trump told Israel Hayom newspaper in an interview published on Sunday.

    Trump added that the issue of settlements will be discussed, when asked whether this issue would become a part of the U.S. plan to settle the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

    The U.S. leader, however, expressed doubts that Palestine or Israel are seeking to reach peace at the current moment.

    “Right now, I would say the Palestinians are not looking to make peace; they are not looking to make peace.

    “And I am not necessarily sure that Israel is looking to make peace … I am right now interested in the Palestinians and Israel.

    “I don’t know frankly if we are going to even have talks, we will see what happens, but I think it is very foolish for the Palestinians and I also think it would be very foolish for the Israelis if they don’t make a deal.

    “It’s our only opportunity and it will never happen after this,” Trump stressed.

    In December, Israel’s cabinet reportedly approved funding worth some 40 million shekels (11 million dollars) for the West Bank settlements.

    Read Also:  Man U blames Trump for half-year loss of £29m

    Palestinians seek diplomatic recognition for their independent state on the territories of the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, which is partially occupied by Israel, and the Gaza Strip.

    The Israeli government refuses to recognise Palestine as an independent political and diplomatic entity, and builds settlements on the occupied areas, in spite of objections from the UN.

    The U.S. authorities have stated on numerous occasions that Washington has been preparing a “deal of the century” that will ensure a comprehensive regional peace process and will put an end to the Israeli-Palestinian confrontation.

    Nevertheless, the details of the plan remain unclear.

    Both during his presidential campaign and after becoming president, Trump promised to take steps toward settling the conflict between Israel and Palestine.

    During his trip to the Middle East in May 2017, the U.S. president told the Israeli and Palestinian leaders that they should make a compromise in order to achieve peace.

    Trump also ordered his senior adviser, Jared Kushner, and Special Representative for International Negotiations, Jason Greenblatt to focus on the Middle East peace process.

    The two officials have made numerous trips to the region and held talks with local officials, but have not revealed the details of their proposals on the issue.

    NAN

  • U.S. embassy will move to Jerusalem within a year

    U.S. embassy will move to Jerusalem within a year

    Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Wednesday said that the U.S. will move its embassy from Tel Aviv  to Jerusalem within a year.

    The prime minister’s timeline drastically differs from that offered earlier by White House officials, who said the move would take at least three to four years due to stringent security measures and other requirements.

    Netanyahu made this known to Israeli reporters on a flight from Dehli to Gujarat during a state visit to India, the Times of Israel reported.

    A spokesman for the prime minster confirmed the content.

    “My confident assessment is that it will move much faster than people think, within a year from today,” Netanyahu said, according to the Times of Israel.

    President Donald Trump recognised Jerusalem as Israel’s capital on Dec. 6 and initiated a process to move the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem.

    Read Also: Israel set to cede parts of Jerusalem in peace deal

    Israel occupied the eastern half of Jerusalem in 1967 and later annexed the territory in a move that was not internationally recognised.

    Israel has long claimed that Jerusalem as its “undivided capital,” while the Palestinians want East Jerusalem as the capital of their future state.

    Trump’s controversial decision sparked protests in some countries and was rejected in a non-binding UN General Assembly resolution.

    The recognition was welcomed in Israel, and Guatemala has since announced it will follow the US in moving its embassy to the city.

    Arab foreign ministers are set to meet on Feb. 1 in Cairo to discuss steps against Trump’s recognition, the Arab League had earlier said.

    dpa/NAN

  • Israel uncovers terror network in West Bank

    Israel uncovers terror network in West Bank

    The Israeli military said security forces arrested 24 Palestinians in the West Bank overnight in an operation uncovering a terror network.

    The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) said it had arrested members of a “vast Hamas network” in the Palestinian city of Qalqilia in the northwestern West Bank.

    It said the arrests were carried out in a joint operation by the Israeli military, the Shin Bet security agency and the Israeli police.

    The Israeli military said in a statement that the network was directed, guided and funded by members of Hamas headquarters in Qatar and the Gaza Strip.

    The statement added that the heads of the network, which ran the regional headquarters, were operating to renew Hamas activity in the area and plotting terror activity.

    The army said that during the operation, security forces seized 9,000 dollars.

    Israel and the U.S. view Hamas as a terror organisation.

    Hamas took over the Gaza Strip in 2007, whereas the Fatah movement is the Palestinian sovereign in the West Bank territories.

  • Gaza: Abbas, Egypt mull new truce

    Gaza: Abbas, Egypt mull new truce

    Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas will hand over to US Secretary of State John Kerry a proposal to end the Gaza crisis in the coming days, Palestinian lawmaker for Fatah Movement Abdullah Abdullah said yesterday.

    Abbas held consultations with the Palestinian leaders and factions as well as Egypt and Saudi Arabia, following which a set of options were reached at, MENA quoted Abdullah as telling the Washington-based Radio Sawa.

    These options will be handed over to Kerry in the coming days and will likely end the Gaza crisis.

    Abdullah, however, denied that the Palestinian proposal included any ideas of demilitarising Gaza Strip, asserting the Palestinians have the right to fight against occupation by all legitimate means.

    Israel wants to eliminate all militants in the coastal enclave, mostly under Palestinian militant group Hamas, while the Hamas seeks end to Israeli occupation and removal of blockades in the conflict-torn Gaza Strip.

    Egypt had called on Israel and the Palestinians to go for ceasefire indefinitely and immediately resume talks in Cairo to reach a permanent ceasefire agreement that ends the ongoing fighting in the Gaza Strip.

    Egyptian mediators have proposed a new ceasefire in Gaza that would open the blockaded enclave’s crossings and allow in aid and reconstruction materials, a senior Palestinian official said Monday.

    The Palestinians, including the de facto Hamas rulers of the enclave, would be willing to accept such a deal if Israel does, the official told AFP.

    The proposal would defer to a later date negotiations on disputed points that have prevented a long-term ceasefire deal, he added.

    An Egyptian official confirmed that mediators have contacted the Palestinians and Israel with a new proposal.

  • Palestinians need a state of their own

    Palestinians need a state of their own

    • Israel cannot remain oasis of peace in a region on fire

    The tragic scenario rarely varies much. Makeshift Palestinian rockets fly out of Gaza and Israel’s guided missiles and artillery shells rain in. The Israeli government vows to eradicate Hamas, the Islamist movement that rules the teeming Gaza Strip. Hamas and its allies beat their breasts and vow eternal resistance. Hundreds of Palestinians, mainly civilians, die, until an international outcry calls a halt to the killing. Mediators manage to tweak the rules of engagement, and both sides reload for the next time. It is a desolate picture.

    Reaction to this conflict, the third in the past five years, has been muted. Syria’s savage civil war, the springboard for the lightning seizure by jihadis of swaths of Iraq, eclipses what for many looks like a new episode in a wearisomely familiar feud. That is short-sighted.

    The current conflict follows the kidnap and killing last month of three Jewish seminary students from a settlement in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, and the subsequent revenge killing of a Palestinian teenager. Benjamin Netanyahu, Israel’s premier, instantly blamed Hamas for the kidnapping, although it looks to have been perpetrated by the Qawasmeh clan in Hebron, which has a record as spoilers of previous ceasefires.

    What they spoiled in this instance was the unity agreement between Hamas and Fatah, its nationalist rivals in the Palestinian Authority that governs part of the West Bank. That deal afforded Mr Netanyahu the excuse to break off US-brokered talks on a two-states solution that had in any case collapsed, mainly as a result of the intransigence of his rightwing coalition, which has accelerated the colonisation of the land on which the Palestinians hope to build their state.

    Yet neither side sought to renew hostilities. Hamas, in particular, is hemmed in and incapable of offering anything but more despair and destruction. The Islamist movement fell out with Iran by refusing to side with Bashar al-Assad in the Syrian conflict, and lost its Muslim Brotherhood ally in neighbouring Egypt after Abdel Fattah al-Sisi’s military coup last summer. Mr Sisi, Egypt’s new president, regards Hamas – the Palestinian chapter of the Brotherhood – as an enemy fuelling the growing jihadi menace in the Sinai peninsula.

    That is one reason Hamas dismissed Egypt’s ceasefire formula, which has no provision for Cairo to reopen the Rafah crossing to Egypt in southern Gaza, much less lift Israel’s blockade of Gaza’s northern border and seaport. Hamas continued firing after Tuesday’s ceasefire was supposed to take hold, presumably intending to show its supporters its infrastructure has hardly been dented and that it can break the siege. That is a delusion. What is more likely is that Israel, in tacit alliance with Egypt, will try to break Hamas, at a cost of many more lives.

    Yet beyond Hamas lies the spectre of the unbridled jihadism seen in Syria and Iraq – which already has bridgeheads in Palestinian refugee camps across the region as well as in Gaza. In this particular conflict, international actors need to mobilise countries such as Turkey and Qatar that have leverage with Hamas, and may persuade them of the ruinous futility of their rocket attacks. Ultimately, that should mean engagement with a Fatah-Hamas coalition government, conditional on an end to violence and a meaningful negotiating framework. That is unlikely.

    Israeli policy has left the Palestinian Authority toothless and discredited, its land eaten away by the continuing occupation of the West Bank and Arab East Jerusalem. But Israel’s reputation in the world is also eroding, and it is an illusion to think it can remain an oasis of peace and prosperity in a region on fire, so long as the Palestinians have no prospect of a viable state of their own.

    – Financial Times