Tag: panel

  • Under-aged voting: INEC sets up eight-member probe panel

    Under-aged voting: INEC sets up eight-member probe panel

    The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) has set up a eight-member committee to investigate the alleged underaged voting in the recent Kano State Local Government Election.

    The Committee, which has two weeks to turn in its report has Abubakar Nahuche, a national Commissioner as Chairman.

    Other members of the committee are: Mrs. May Agbamuche-Mbu, a national Commissioner, Kassim Geidam Resident Electoral Commissioner, Adamawa State, Yakubu Duku, Electoral Operations Department, Mrs. Rukayat Bello Voter Registry Department, Paul Omokere ICT Department and Mr. Jude Okwuonu P&M Department, Secretary.

    The Chairman of the Commission, Prof. Mahmood Yakubu announced the composition of the panel yesterday when he received in audience Leadership of the Forum of State Independent Electoral Commissions of Nigeria (FOSIECON) at the Commission’s headquarters.

    Yakubu said the committee shall focus solely on the allegation of under-aged persons on the voter register.

    The committee, he said, among other things is to ascertain if the voter register requested by the KSIEC was actually used in the council poll.

    As part of the terms of reference, the committee is to investigate the widespread report that persons below the statutory age of 18 years voted using INEC’s register.

    The committee he said is also expected to engage with stakeholders on issues related to the use of the voter register in the election.

    At the end of its work, the committee is expected to make any other recommendations which in its opinion are relevant to its assignment.

    He stressed that since both bodies have constitutional mandate to conduct elections, the committee is not investigating the conduct or outcome of Local Government election by the Kano State Independent Electoral Commission (KSIEC).

    Besides, he said issue of under-aged voting has given cause for the review of the aspect of the collaboration between the Commission and the SIEC.

    He said: “INEC will continue to improve on our processes and procedures. We are totally committees to the task of strengthening our electoral process. Where we have cause to review aspects of our collaboration, we will not hesitate to do so. One such area is the alleged incidence of under-aged voting in the recent Local Government election in Kano state. We promised Nigerians that the matter will be fully investigated and a committee will be set up for this purpose headed by a national commissioner with Resident Electoral Commissioners and staff from technical departments of the commission as members.

  • Abuse of local content Act: Senate panel alleges bribe offer to kill probe

    Abuse of local content Act: Senate panel alleges bribe offer to kill probe

    Chairman, Senate Committee on Local Content, Senator Solomon Adeola, yesterday said he was offered a vessel to drop a petition seeking investigation of an international oil firm for allegedly flouting the Nigerian Oil and Gas Industry Content Development Act.

    He spoke at a Senate hearing on a petition by Indigenous Ships Owners Association of Nigeria on alleged attempt to deny Nigerian shippers the, after being technically and commercially pre-qualified for almost five years.

    The committee invited the oil firm, NNPC, National Petroleum Investment Management Services (NAPIMS) and the petitioners to look into the allegation.

    Adeola said the interest of his committee was to investigate the allegation to determine the overall propriety of the oil firm, adding that his committee also wanted to establish if there were interests other than national interest at play.

    The Senator, representing Lagos West, said he is aware that there are forces trying to scuttle the contract validly entered into between the oil firm and members of the Indigenous Vessels Operators Association of Nigeria.

    He said, ‘’They offered me a vessel to abort this Senate Committee of local content’s probe and I refused. We have received ample information to take decision, or resolve this matter, but for the sake of the principle of fair hearing, it is the very reasons we want to hear from the representatives of the oil firm, the National Petroleum Investment Management Services (NAPIMS) and other stakeholders involved in this case’’

    The committee directed the Nigerian Content Development and Monitoring Board (NCDMB), to give NAPIMS a waiver in order to allow the 10 indigenous vessel owners who bided initially and adjudged pre-qualified to bid again.

    The Committee also directed the resumption of the tendering process for contracts for supply of vessels to the oil firm which was stopped after almost five years of the tendering process.

    The Deputy General Manager, NAPIMS, Roland Ewubare, said there appeared to be a valid reason to alter the contracts. He asked for time to work with the committee, the oil firm and the local contractors to fix whatever is the problem.

    Ewubare said he is aware that the oil firm is the only international oil company that has put mechanism in place to support indigenous vessel owners.

    The Indigenous Vessels Operators Association of Nigeria had asked the Senate Committee to intervene to stop the oil firm from cancelling the bidding contract it entered with the association’s members in 2014.

    It told the committee that it all began in 2014 when the oil firm, a joint venture partner with the Nigerian Government in the upstream sector of the oil and gas industry published a tender with reference no. NTD 0001632 for the provision of Platform Support Vessels (PSV) and Terminal Support Vessels (TSV) by Indigenous vessels operators.

  • ‘Fayose set up kangaroo panel to indict me’

    ‘Fayose set up kangaroo panel to indict me’

    Former Ekiti State Governor and Minister of Mines and Steel Development Dr. Kayode Fayemi recently hosted All Progressives Congress (APC) chieftains from 16 local governments at an end-of-the-year party in his hometown, Isan-Ekiti. He spoke with reporters on the Judicial Commission of Inquiry that has indicted him, speculations about his governorship ambition and the APC’s preparations for the poll. ODUNAYO OGUNMOLA was there.

    Speculations are rife that you have the intention to run for governor. Are you running again?

    It is the stuff of politics for people to speculate, especially as elections draw close. But, there is nothing that is happening now that is new;  Since I left office in Ekiti in 2014, I’ve always made it a point of duty to host party leaders and members every quarter and we use these gatherings to reflect on the state of the party and state of the nation.

    We’ve held these meetings 12 consecutive times. Of course, based on feedback, we’ve also broadened representation at the meetings. So, the one you’ve witnessed today is very large because all wards, local governments, LCDAs, senatorial and state executives of the party are here led by our National Deputy Chairman, Engr Segun Oni who is from Ekiti and our State Party chairman, Chief Jide Awe.  Over 7000 party chieftains came here today.

    The bottom line for us is that we have to ensure that our party is well positioned and strengthened to go into elections. It has nothing to do with a personal ambition or an intention to contest. I believe that is the burden leadership has thrust upon me and I don’t want to shirk that responsibility.

    The choice really for every Ekiti free-born is either to walk away and avoid Ekiti like a plague. And many have done that, particularly the elite. The alternative is to treat Ekiti as a sick child.

    We all know how a concerned mother treats a sick child; when a child is sick and the child refuses to take any food and the prescribed drugs, our mothers apply tough love to that child and what is that tough love? In Ekiti, mothers have a way of force-feeding the sick child – blocking his two nostrils, pinning his hands and legs down, before putting the food and drugs in the child’s mouth. Of course, the child will wail and cry as mothers apply this tough love, but ultimately, it is for the good of the child because If you agree with me that Ekiti is a sick child, I leave you to speculate about the application of tough love on a sick child. As for contest or no contest, we will cross that bridge when we get there.

    The Judicial Commission of Inquiry set up by the Fayose administration has indicted you for financial recklessness. What is your reaction to this?

    You know my view about our friend, the alawada-in-chief (comedian-in-chief) in the Government House; I am always unequivocal in my view about him as a misfit, an uncouth political thug and a rabble rouser who has not learned anything from his previous travails after being thrown out of office in 2006.

    So, how do I respond to something I regard as illegal and unconstitutional by a Governor who i have the least regard for?

    What Ayo Fayose set up was a kangaroo panel with a clear mandate to work to a predetermined answer?

    Try and remember the genesis of the panel. His rubber stamp House of Assembly passed a resolution that he should probe Fayemi over an alleged stealing of N852 million from SUBEB and for giving President Buhari N1.5billion of Ekiti money because i refused to appear before them. Based on that resolution, he set up the Oyewole panel after I’d gone to court to challenge the shenanigan in the assembly.

    If you had followed the Ayo Fayose story, he believes that (I am) the only one in this state who can clip his boisterous wings and he wants to do everything  to embarrass me in the hope or expectation that I will come crawling to beg him. Unfortunately for him, he has chosen the wrong target this time. He started by denying me my entitlements as prescribed by law as a former Governor of this state. I didn’t even bat an eyelid, neither did i ask him to pay.

    Even all my political appointees who served the state with distinction were denied their severance claims and entitlements and he tried to use the payment as a bait to lure some of them to his side.

    Again, he failed. No appointee of mine left the APC to join him: So, a panel which started with the so-called N852 million that Fayemi stole from SUBEB fell flat as it could not even sustain the lie that any money was missing, especially after the bank, Access Bank, told his panel the bank took back their money because government did not fulfill the terms and conditions attached to the loan after I left office. They also informed all and sundry that it was the Fayose administration that took the N71million interest rate that accrued. By the time the joke of a panel completed its hatchet job, what Fayemi stole had shifted from N852m to 17 buses and he also mismanaged the bond and must explain N2.6 billion.

    At the risk of being immodest, everyone in this country knows that I’m an advocate of transparency and accountability in public office. I’d be happy to explain anything that’s unclear after leaving over 500 page, painstakingly detailed hand-over note on my stewardship, but not to an administration that has no interest in seeking the truth.

    Without prompting, I declared my assets publicly when I became Ekiti Governor and did when I left office. There is nothing that i have by way of assets that i cannot defend.

    And as President Buhari’s pointsman at NEITI who also chairs the inter-agencies task force on anti-corruption, I have a duty, indeed a responsibility not to do anything to bring his name or mine into disrepute. Now, tell me: Is Fayose a serious human being? I’m told he’s now cooking up a white paper that he can shop around with a view to getting me banned from public office. Can you imagine? What a joker? Anyway, the less said, the better on the panel. We will see who would end up in jail in Nigeria between Ayo Fayose and I.  You see me in Ekiti all the time, I walk around Ekiti freely.  We shall see if Ayo Fayose will be able to walk freely after October 16.

    Fayose has said that you have never attracted any Federal Government project to Ekiti State as a minister. This is an opportunity for you to tell the whole world how you have used the office to the benefit of your home state.

    The trouble with Ayo Fayose is that every time he opens his mouth, he exhibits an unbelievable level of ignorance which underscores why our state is in the doldrums.

    I have told the whole world what I have used my office to benefit Ekiti and to benefit the whole of Nigeria not once, not twice. I am Minister of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, I am not Minister for Ekiti State affairs. Governors who love their people and want progress for their states know how they get things for their states.

    For his information, I am responsible for mineral resources development in 36 states and the contiguous water bodies offshore. But yes, I am also the representative of Ekiti in the Federal Executive Council and what I have done with the position is tangible, measurable and clear and for his information –  it is better than what was done for our state in the previous sixteen years when PDP was in the saddle in the centre. And i must confess that his irresponsible behaviour and crass incompetence have made things more difficult for our state and prevented her from even more benefits from the FG. but to come back to what we have done. Take for example the federal secretariat. For the last sixteen years, Ekiti has been trying desperately to have a major federal secretariat here where all the federal institutions will operate from. I went on inspection yesterday to check how far work has gone in the Federal Secretariat (under construction) and I am pleased with the progress being made. That project was awarded under this Buhari administration and I knew how it was awarded, I don’t want to claim credit for anything but I knew what I had to do to ensure that the Minister (in charge) not only awarded it but awarded it to a competent company run by Ekiti indigenes.

    That is one. Number two, former Governor Rotimi Amaechi has never stopped telling people why he had to extend the rail to Ekiti State which was not in the original standard guage rail plan put together by the PDP.

    Ekiti was not factored into the plan done by the Jonathan administration or the Obasanjo administration before it. The only time Ekiti State found its way into the federal rail project is under this administration and I went to meet the President and pleaded with minister Amaechi that the rail should be extended to our state. You have heard of N-Power, nearly 4,000 Ekiti indigenes are beneficiaries of N-Power as we speak and if we wait for another two months, over 12,000 Ekiti citizens will be beneficiaries of N-Power. That is an initiative that is akin to our own Youth Volunteer Scheme, just like the Social Security benefit which we are paying at the federal level now is similar to our Social Security scheme in Ekiti. I know what the families of those young men and women who are now getting N30,000 monthly on account of N-power are saying about president Buhari. Ekiti public servants are being owed from six to eight months salaries; N-Power beneficiaries got their December salary on 22nd of December.

    I am talking broadly now. Let me come down to mining; the Nigerian Geological Surveys Agency has just completed a comprehensive survey of kaolin in Ekiti and the result is very promising

    The next phase is to move into production. We are commencing the exploration of bauxite, lithium and feldspar and we are pulling together all the small scale miners in Ekiti to enable them benefit from the recently launched N5 billion support fund placed in the Bank of Industry. The Central Bank that has been languishing for years is almost completed, I was there yesterday ditto the youth in agriculture scheme is being expanded at the federal level.

    When people open their mouth and say Federal Government has not done anything and the person who has the temerity to say this to people in Ekiti collects every month, Budget Support Fund, Bailout Funds, Paris Club release in addition to the Federal Allocation to which the state is entitled, you don’t need to be a rocket scientist to know that this is more a celebration of ignorance. I’ve not mentioned the Ecological Funds he collected, the refunds on the roads that I did which has now gone through the Federal Executive Council or the Central Bank’s N2.2 billion SME (Small and Medium Enterprise) fund and he can stand before people to say all sorts of rubbish. I know he believes that lying is what has given him success in politics since he believes Ekiti people are ignorant and gullible. Somebody who has zero integrity can open his mouth and talk; a man who could steal from his own pocket – look at what he did with the delegates’ funds at their recent convention.  And a shameless man like that is still talking?

    No wonder, nobody came out for his local government elections charade because Ekiti people are fed up with this man. I see it daily, they come to me saying ‘what can you do to help us to get rid of this man.’ I say to them he has four years and he has immunity but immunity is not permanent, some of us had immunity before and we are walking the streets of Ekiti today without immunity. ButI know people who will not walk the streets of Ekiti the day they stop being governor of this state. We will all be here and will see what will happen.

     How do you assure Nigerians that APC is the party they should keep faith in as the 2019 general election beckons?

    I take that question very seriously; in governance and in political science, there is something we call mid-term blues. Every government runs into a mid-term blues. It’s almost an automatic curve; you get to a point where you are not as popular as you were when you got into office. However, the context is always important; we came into office at a point that the major source of our economy, oil, was selling at $30 a barrel. Years before then, the average price of crude oil was $100 a barrel, these are facts, not conjectures or suppositions. So, it automatically means that the revenue base of Nigeria dropped by 70 per cent and we had to manage with 30 per cent. Maybe given the context of the election, there are always those who will say we over-promised.

    The truth though was that Nigerians wanted anybody but Jonathan and given the depth of depravity and corruption of the Jonathan administration, they felt General Buhari offered the most promising platform for change on account of his spartan integrity, not on account of the plethora of policy ideas contained in our manifesto.

    I was in charge of policy during the campaign and people certainly brought a lot of ideas – you must do this, you must build a million houses, you must generate these number of jobs etc. I see a lot of documents flying around WhatsApp pages these days claiming to come from our manifesto but many of them are fake.

    I can tell you that the President then as candidate and immediately after we won, limited himself to the three cardinal themes – namely, restoring security, particularly in the North East, fighting corruption and rebuilding the economy.  This was the mandate he gave the Transition Committee and he consistently cautioned us to limit ourselves to the three cardinals. Wherever you hear him speak, he would not go beyond the three cardinals;

    He never went beyond that and if you are to judge him on account of those three, I would honestly say that he has tried. The economy is out of recession, even though we still have a lot of grounds to cover, the security situation in this country particularly in the north east has improved significantly. By now (during Yuletide), you would have heard of bombs going off in and around the FCT, even in churches in Abuja, in Eagle Square, Abuja. People could not sleep with their eyes closed under the Jonathan administration.

    This is no longer the case, even though it is also true that terrorism never full disappears. In fact, the reality of every terrorism experience is that it mutates.

    Because of that, the President has taken a two-pronged approach to resolving the security crisis particularly in the Northeast. The first focus is on the military option and that precisely is why the military is asking for additional resources to prosecute that military option. But much more importantly, he focuses on the development option; that is what has led to the creation of the Northeast Development Commission now. People hardly talk about that, they always want to talk about the military option but if you don’t have a human security response to security challenges, you cannot resolve it fully.

    We must be tough on terrorism, but we must be even tougher on the root causes of terrorism.

    There is still an army of unemployed and underemployed youths who can become cannon fodder for further crisis in these places and if you don’t provide a mechanism for dealing with that situation, it won’t go away.

    Long-term solution is the development option, but the short-term is the military option; military itself cannot solve the problem (alone). To make a bomb, I will show you a site now on the web, on how you can make a bomb and it is the easiest thing to do. If you think that is going to stop, it won’t. All Nigerians ironically don’t appreciate, what we expect them to appreciate is that there are more potential explosions stopped than there are that actually occurred but security people will not come and tell you that ‘in Ado-Ekiti yesterday, we foiled an attempt to bomb Emmanuel Church’ ah, people will not go to Emmanuel Church again. So they cannot talk, they have to labour under the notion of not doing enough even though they do more than we will ever know.

    If you go to the anti-corruption crusade, we have been accused of all sorts of things that the anti-corruption war is selective, it is not institutionalised. I happen to chair an inter-agency task force on anti-corruption, comprising agencies such as EFCC, ICPC, CCB, FIRS, NEITI etc and somebody was talking this morning that they are not using enough technology, can anybody say that?  These agencies have perfected the art of tracking money and the amount of money that had been recovered, all the governments in Nigeria put together in the last sixteen years have not succeeded in recovering it. But then again, we are victims of international politics; some of the money that had been recovered, we cannot even bring it back because of the conditionalities attached by the countries where these stolen monies have been found. We are a sovereign state, somebody wants to tell us that in order for you to have your $540 million back, you must tell us what you want to use the money for, our money? We should even charge you for allowing your country to aid and abet such a crime; allowing your country to be used as a safe haven for illicit funds. But you want to tell us that you are ready to return the money but what are we going to do with the money? What is your business with that? But because of the track record of the previous administrations where monies retrieved were re-looted, you can understand where such claims are coming from even if it cannot be justified.

    But it is being institutionalised, more work is being done, the resources retrieved are being identified and the accusation that the fight is one-sided, of course it is targeted. Who has had his/her finger on the plough in the last sixteen years? You cannot accuse me of what I did not know anything about or what I have not had the opportunity of even serving at that level? Nobody can accuse you of that, I was governor in Ekiti, I can be accused, even if it is a ‘419 accusation,’ the record shows that I was governor in Ekiti for four years, how can you then say it is one-sided. People should not pay attention to that; the truth of the matter is that there is less corruption (now) in the system, I cannot say it has been wiped out completely because the President himself will not condone it, the body language itself is not disposed to corruption. You as a minister, you cannot condone it; in the age of TSA (Treasury Single Account), you cannot spend money that has electronically gone into the system without due process. Significantly, you cannot get the kind of mind-boggling stories you hear where somebody, I read the story of one Ngozi Olejeme yesterday and my head was spinning as I read the story. Ah, N50 billion? That one individual and 38 houses? Is that not madness? And yet, people still have mouths to talk because they want to come back and steal more money, that is what PDP is about.

  • Pepple heads minimum wage panel

    Negotiation for a new minimum wage is set to begin with yesterday’s appointment of members of the National Minimum Wage negotiating committee by President Muhammadu Buhari.

    The 30-man panel is headed by former Head of Service of the Federation and one time Minister of Housing, Land and Urban Development, Ms Ama Pepple.

    A statement from the Federal Ministry of Labour and Employment said the committee is made up of appointees of the Federal Government, six representatives of governors, nine representatives of the organised labour and eight representatives of employers of Labour.

    Members of the tripartite committee are Ama Pepple, CFR    (Chairman), Minister of Labour and         Employment, Senator Chris Ngige (Deputy Chairman), while the Chairman, National Salaries, Income and Wages Commission, Chief Richard Egbule will serve as member/secretary).

    Other members are Minister of Budget and National Planning Udoma Udo Udomoh; Minister of Finance Mrs. Kemi Adeosun; Head of Service of the Federation Mrs. Winifred E. Oyo–Ita and Permanent Secretary, General Services Office, Office of the  Secretary to the Government of the Federation, Dr. Roy Ugo.

    The Nigeria Governors’ Forum (NGF) will be represented by Governor Rauf Aregbesola   – Osun State (Southwest), Imo State Governor Rochas Okorocha (Souheast), Gombe State Governor Hassan Dankwambo   (Northeast), Rivers State Governor Nyesom Wike (Southsouth); Plateau State Governor Simon Lalong    (North Central) and Kebbi State Governor Abubakar Atiku Bagudu   (Northwest). A. B. Okauru, Esq., DG, NGF   will be an observer.

    The Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC) will be represented by President of Congress (NLC) Comrade Ayuba Wabba, Comrade Peters Adeyemi, Comrade Kiri Mohammed, Comrade Amechi Asugwuni and General Secretary Comrade Peter Ozo-Eson.

    President of the Trade Union Congress, Comrade Bobboi Bala Kaigama will lead the delegation from the Congress which include Comrade Sunday Olusoji Salako Comrade Alade Bashir Lawal as well as Comrade Igwe Achese, President, Nigeria Union of Petroleum        and Natural Gas Workers (NUPENG).

    Director General, Nigeria Employers’ Consultative Association (NECA), Olusegun Oshinowo will lead employers to the negotiation while other members from the employers delegation include Timothy Olawale, Mr. Chuma Nwankwo, Director General, Federation of Construction Industry (FOCI), Mrs. Olubunmi Adekoje, Chairman, Kaduna East Branch,        Manufacturers’ Association (MAN). Alhaji Ahmed Ladan Gobir Otunba Francis Oluwagbenro, President, Kano Chambers of Commerce, Industry, Mines and         Agriculture (NACCIMA), Hajia Muheeba Dankaka, and President, Nigeria Association of Small and Medium Enterprises (NASME), Prince Degun Agboade.

    The statement said: “The Committee will be inaugurated on Monday, November 27, at the Council Chambers, Aso Rock Presidential Villa, Sate House, Abuja. Committee members are expected to arrive at the State House Pilot Gate latest 10.30am and be seated by 11am.”

     

  • Obasanjo, Jonathan used police against governors, says Senate panel

    Obasanjo, Jonathan used police against governors, says Senate panel

    •Senators hail Buhari for ordering return of Obiano’s security details

    Former Presidents Olusegun Obasanjo and Goodluck Jonathan used the police as a political tool against perceived opponents, the Senate Committee on Police Affairs alleged yesterday.

    The committee was mandated by the Senate in plenary on Wednesday to ensure immediate compliance to its resolution demanding the reinstatement of Anambra State Governor Willie Obiano’s security details.

    The upper chamber asked the committee to follow up the resolution and report back to the Senate yesterday.

    Chaired by Senator Abu Ibrahim, the committee said in its report that “it is significant and exemplary” that President Muhammadu Buhari  ordered the immediate reinstatement of the governor’s security aides even before the Senate resolution.

    It described the withdrawal of Obiano’s security aides as “most unfortunate,” and added that “it is heartwarming that the police authorities have explained that the action was not intended to cause the governor any injury or harm”.

    The committee said: “Nigerians must not forget however that the perceived use of the police to persecute a sitting governor was actually made a best-practice tool by immediate past administrations.

    “In those days of impunity, the directives (to use the police to persecute political opponents) were directly linked to the presidency and the then sitting presidents never issued any instructions to counter the positions of the police and security services.

    “The following examples illustrate clearly: ‘Dr. Chris Ngige as the then Governor of Anambra State suffered abduction and when he regained freedom and attempted to castigate the powers that be at the federal level, his security details were withdrawn on January 2, 2005.

    “In April 2007, a few days to the election, ’higher’ authorities ordered the withdrawal of the ADC and the CSO to Senator Bola Ahmed Tinubu. The APC leader was also threatened with arrest in the lead-up to the 2011 elections.

    “In September 2013, the then Governor Rotimi Amaechi, in his capacity as the Chairman of the Nigerian Governors’ Forum, was harassed on several occasions with the threat of withdrawal of his security aides.

    “While his were repeated threats, the President of this Distinguished Senate, Dr. Bukola Saraki, was not that lucky. His aides were actually withdrawn in September 2013 as punishment for his support of the rebellion within the then ruling PDP.

    “In February 2014, the security details attached to the then Governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN), Sanusi Lamido Sanusi, were withdrawn on the orders of the presidency. The same man suffered the same fate again when he became the Emir of Kano in June 2014.

    “The Emir’s palace was sealed off by the police to prevent him from entering it and he had to assume his responsibilities from within the confines of the Kano State government House.

    “It is also on record that at the same time, security aides to the then Governor (now senator) Rabiu Musa Kwankwaso were withdrawn. All on ’orders from above’.

    “The then Governor Murtala Nyako of Adamawa State had his security details withdrawn in April 2014.

    “In October 2014, the security details of the then Speaker, House of Representatives, Aminu Waziri Tambuwal, were withdrawn. This was after a blatant attempt was made to effect his impeachment.”

    Following President Buhari’s order for the immediate reinstatement of Obianor’s security aides, the issue was not raised on the floor of the Senate yesterday.

  • Maina’s recall: Nothing ’ll be swept under carpet, says Senate panel

    Maina’s recall: Nothing ’ll be swept under carpet, says Senate panel

    •Committee to submit report next month

    The Senate ad-hoc panel investigating the surreptitious recall of former Chairman, Presidential Task Force on Pension Reform Abdulrasheed Maina yesterday vowed not to sweep anything under the carpet in its quest to expose those behind the matter.

    The committee said its report would be submitted to the Senate in plenary for consideration in December.

    Chairman of the panel Senator Emmanuel Paulker stated this while briefing reporters after a closed door session with the Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice Abubakar Malami.

    The meeting was held in his office apparently to keep the discussion of the panel secret.

    Senator Paulker said the committee resolved to conduct the investigation behind closed door because the committee wanted to do thorough probe of the issue assigned to it.

    The Bayelsa Central lawmaker said the investigative hearing was shifted to his office on account of his personal discretion.

    He said: “It is at my discretion to hold the meeting in my office.  All the four chairmen of the committee were present.  We don’t want a situation whereby media report will dictate section of our report.  The closed door session will allow us to do thorough investigation on the matter.”

    Paulker added: “Nothing will be swept under the carpet. The truth of matter will come out at the end of our investigation and the report will be submitted before Christmas.”

    The meeting yesterday will be the second time this week that Malami will appear before the panel.

    It is also expected that the AGF will appear before the committee next week.

    When the AGF appeared on Tuesday, The Nation exclusively reported that Malami admitted that he met with Maina in Dubai, United Arab Emirates (UAE) last year.

  • Kaduna teachers’ sack: Assembly raises probe panel

    The Kaduna State House of Assembly has raised a seven-man committee, led by Deputy Majority Leader Idris Abduwahab, to investigate teachers’ grievances and proffer ideas to improve education.

    The committee is to submit its report this week, he added.

    The Assembly lamented last week’s attack on its officers and the complex by the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), in which property worth millions of naira were destroyed.

    The NLC, last week, protested alleged plans by the government to sack 21,780 primary school teachers, who failed a competency test. The protest was led by NLC’s President Ayuba Wabba.

    The Chairman, House Committee on Information and Home Affairs, Nuhu Goroh Shadalafia and Chairman, House Committee on Establishment Hassan Abdulkadir, were allegedly attacked.

    According to Shadalafia, the lawmakers were almost lynched by the protesters who broke the glass wall of the Assembly’s main office, pursued them and vandalised cars and other property.

    The lawmaker said none of them has received a petition or complaint from their constituency on the planned sack. He urged the teachers and workers to follow laid down rules on protest.

    “Nobody has been given three months’ notice; nobody has been stopped from going to school; nobody has been asked to pack out of their quarters. The House is taking note of the damaged facility, and would report to the government.

    “I have formally written a letter of complaint on what transpired in the leadership of the House and government would decide what to do,” Shadalafia stated.

  • AGF stops Obono-Obla panel

    AGF stops Obono-Obla panel

    •Aide declines comment

    Vice President Yemi Osinbajo has expressed discomfort about the activities of the Special Investigation Panel for the Recovery of Public Property (SIPRPP).

    The panel is headed by the Special Assistant to President Muhammadu Buhari on Prosecution, Mr.Okoi Obono- Obla.

    The panel set up under the Recovery of Public Property (Special Provisions) Act, was constituted in August by the government.

    However, the Vice President is said to be unhappy with the way the panel’s Chairman was exercising his power.

    Although no details of any wrongdoing was disclosed, Obono-Obla is alleged to have disregarded Civil Service’s established administrative procedures and protocols.

    Minister of Justice and Attorney General of the Federation (AGF) Abubakar Malami disclosed this in a November 1, 2017 letter to Obono-Obla, a copy of which was sighted at the weekend.

    It was learnt that Malami’s letter was informed by an earlier letter by the VP and in which he (the VP) complained about the activities of the Obono-Obla-led panel.

    It was learnt that the AGF has now asked Obono-Obla to halt further activities in his capacity as the Chairman of the panel.

    The AGF, according to a source within the Federal Ministry of Justice, has also asked Obono-Obla to provide an up-to-date report of the panel’s activities till date, and to seek clearance from the Minister of Justice before taking further actions.

    Obono-Obla is said to have also been asked to seek clearance from the AGF before granting interviews.

    The AGF in his letter in which he acknowledged receipt of the letter from Osinbajo, expressed his concerns on the activities of the Panel which runs contrary to the enabling Act establishing it.

    He also noted that “the activities of the Panel run foul or contrary to established administrative procedures and protocols in the Federal Civil Service structure.

    “In view of the foregoing, coupled with the directives contained in the letter under reference, you are hereby directed to refrain from any further action or taking any step in your capacity as the Chairman of the Special Investigation Panel on the Recovery of Public Property with immediate effect until directed otherwise by His Excellency, the Vice President.

    “While you are to await further instructions in respect of the panel’s mandate, you are hereby directed to promptly provide a detailed up-to-date report on the activities of the panel to the undersigned for onward transmission to the Vice President.

    “Furthermore, you are required to henceforth seek clearance from the Honourable Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice before granting any media interview or making press releases on official matters.”

    Obono-Obla confirmed the AGF’s letter to him, but declined to comment on its content or react to issues contained in it.

    He said he would not comment because it was still an issue between him and the AGF.

    He said the issue referred to was contained in a letter the AGF wrote to him, and to which he was preparing his response.

    Obono-Obla said it would be wrong for him to discuss such an issue in the media when he had not responded to the AGF’s letter.

    “I cannot comment. Is it about the letter from the AGF to me? Who took it to the Press? We have to find out first.

    “Because. it is a private communication from the AGF to me, and to which he requires me to react. And to which I am preparing my reaction.

    “So, I don’t know why it should be made a matter of controversy in the media.

    “I will have to first react to the minister’s letter before answering any questions from the media,” Obono-Obla said

    Read Also: FG drops Obono-Obla as recovery panel chairman

  • Dismantle Ekiti panel for alleged bias, says lawyer

    •Commission: counsel bungled his client’s case

    A lawyer, Adeoye Aribasoye, has called for the dismantling of the Judicial Commission of Enquiry investigating finances of Ekiti State government between October 2010 and October 2014.

    Aribasoye is representing CASA Nigeria Limited, the contractor that built the Ado-Ekiti Civic Centre during the tenure of former Governor Kayode Fayemi.

    The lawyer said the panel could no longer be trusted on fairness, hence the need for its members to withdraw.

    According to him, the seven-member panel, led by a former Acting Chief Judge, Justice Silas Oyewole (retd), was “biased and grossly partisan and working towards a predetermined conclusion”.

    The lawyer alleged that the panel, at its sitting on October 6, prepared a ruling before hearing the matter of the day, when it allegedly shut out his client and delivered a bench ruling.

    But the panel denied Aribasoye’s allegation, insisting that the lawyer should be blamed for allegedly bungling his client’s case.

    It accused Aribasoye of failing to file the application to reopen his client’s case on time, despite the opportunity allegedly given to him.

    An examination of the commission’s time table showed that CASA Nigeria Limited was supposed to make “conditional appearance” before the panel on September 5, as a witness.

    CASA’s Project Manager Mr. Apata Ayodele, according to an affidavit sworn to on September 5, appealed for an extension of time for him to appear because the information about the time table was received late.

    Addressing reporters yesterday in Ado-Ekiti, the state capital, Aribasoye accused the panel of preventing his client from giving evidence, as contained in its preliminary objection, which touches on integrity of the panel to be fair.

    He said: “When I appeared before the panel on September 5, I told them that my client would not be available on September 6. They asked me to formally apply for an extension of time with which I would reopen the case. They said I should file all applications regarding this on or before September 11, and I did.

    “But to my surprise, on October 6, the matter came up for argument, and the panel gave a bench ruling on an issue that was argued for about 30 minutes.

    “They didn’t even rise for a second to prepare the ruling. This suggested that they had already written the ruling before the appearance.

    “This confirmed our fear that this panel had a predetermined mission. It was set up for a sinister motive and the members must disqualify themselves, in line with the law.”

    Aribasoye tendered a letter, dated September 11 and addressed to the commission’s chairman to buttress his point that he applied for an extension of time.

    The lawyer cited the cases of Kenom Vs Tekan, 2001, 14 Nigeria Weekly Law Report (NWLR), Part 732, page 12 at 41 and FG Vs MKO Abiola, to substantiate his claim that the panel can no longer proceed on moral grounds.

    He said: “The Supreme Court’s members in the case of Abiola disqualified themselves, based on allegation raised by G. O. K. Ajayi (SAN) that the justices could not exhibit fairness. I want the panel to toe the same line.”

    But a ruling delivered by Justice Oyewole dismissed the application for CASA’s conditional appearance on the strength that the application was filed out of time.

  • On APC panel on restructuring

    When, lately, Nobel laureate Wole Soyinka, slammed former President Olusegun Obasanjo for trivialising the agitations of Nigeria’s constituents for restructuring of the country, it only shows the extent of the reach of the clamour for the nation’s reorganisation, and the volume the call has gathered. In Soyinka’s words for instance, he said Nigeria was long overdue for reconfiguring, and noted that only dishonest citizens of the country would shy away from the need to decentralise the country.

    Although there are those who attribute the reaction from the Nobel Laureate to the age-long rift between him and the former President, yet, to a preponderance of Nigerian citizenry, the stance Obasanjo gave on the Channels Television that rather than the country’s restructuring, Nigerians need to restructure their mentality, mind, and understanding of the country instead, and the blunt declaration that he cannot be part of it didn’t go down well with most Nigerians.

    It was no surprise that Soyinka was raged by the standpoint of former President Obasanjo as he said he finds his stance very dishonest and cheap trivialising an issue of such great consequence. For Wole Soyinka, it is about ‘the protocols of association of the constitutive parts of a nation’. In his words, Nigeria is over-centralised.

    Soyinka is not alone on this. Many Nigerians across the ethnic divides are. The agitation continues to sprout shades of issues and discusses that raise fundamental questions. There is the question of what exactly is the meaning and essence of restructuring?

    For the purpose of this treatise,  we provide Wikipedia’s interpretation: ‘Restructuring is the corporate management term for the act of reorganizing the legal, ownership, operational, or other structures of a company for the purpose of making it more profitable, or better organized for its present needs’.

    Other reasons for restructuring include a change of ownership or ownership structure, demerger, or a response to a crisis or major change in the business such as bankruptcy, repositioning, or buyout.

    There is a striking take-home from the foregoing definition of restructuring. Of particular interest is the fact that restructuring is essentially necessitated by the purpose of making a structure more profitable or better organized for its present needs. Who then dare says the present political configuration of Nigeria isn’t an albatross on her neck. Not even the ruling All Progressives Congress dare denies it.  As a matter of fact, the party has reorganisation of the country as part of its manifestos, only unfortunate that it had to wait for this long until the call for it reaches an ugly crescendo.

    Now the APC has been constrained by the forceful and sweeping agitations arising from the need to restructure to constitute a panel and saddled with the charge to look into the agitation by making arrangements for public hearing on the theme, what it should have done much earlier. The party named the panel ‘Committee on True Federalism’, and it has been announced that the committee will hold public hearing in the six geopolitical zones of the country, starting from Benin, the Edo State capital. On this, we think it’s better late than never.

    It is good and propitious, except for pretenders who are out to cheapen the need for the all-important reorganisation. There are burning issues about creation/merger of states, derivation principle, devolution of powers, federating units, fiscal federalism and revenue allocation and form of government.

    There are also other issues as independent candidacy, land tenure system, local government autonomy, power sharing and rotation, resource control and type of legislature, all of which threatens the feet of the country if something urgent is not done. The reports of the various political conferences show that these issues are dire, consequential and urgent.

    The Governor Nasir El-Rufai committee which has been commissioned to deliver on the need for restructuring must be definite about it. There is the unspoken, yet palpable fear in the faces of Nigerians that the plan to tour the constituent geographical zones and allied decisions may end up the way of its kind – to have a report that will be swept under the carpet after a whole lot of time and taxpayers money must have been lavishly expended on the effort.

    Embarking on states tour to collate people’s opinions is key, yes, but Nigerians are virtually cynical about it because it’s a familiar bait. We fear that it appears what the ruling party itches to do is not only to kill the 2014 confab resolutions, but to also look for a way to waste Nigerians’ time and resources, only to do away with the restructuring in the end.

    I salute and agree with the Sultan of Sokoto, Muhammadu Sa’ad Abubakar III and Emir of Kano, Muhammad Sanusi II CON, who have canvassed that some parts of the 2014 Confab report should be looked into as a way to settle the restructuring agitation.

    Every Nigerian must rise to this occasion by keeping watch on the panel and its activities to ensure that the nation is not rubbed the usual way. The committee on the other hand must be seen to be doing the purpose for which it is commissioned.  It must do only which the people of Nigeria yearns for and which is in the nation’s best interest, not the bidding of an ephemeral political grouping.

     

    • Dr. Ajulo is an Abuja-based legal practitioner.