Tag: PDP crisis

  • Fresh moves to resolve  PDP crisis outside court

    Fresh moves to resolve PDP crisis outside court

    Notwithstanding the initial failure of Dr. Goodluck Jonathan’s Peace Initiative to substitute the ongoing legal battle between the Peoples Democratic Party’s factions with an out of court political solution, Associate Editor, Sam Egburonu, reports that concerned elders of the party have not given up on the out of court resolution

    NOTWITHSTANDING the initial failure of Dr. Goodluck Jonathan’s Peace Initiative to substitute the ongoing legal battle between the Peoples Democratic Party’s factions with an out of court political solution, Associate Editor, Sam Egburonu, reports that concerned elders of the party have not given up on the out of court resolution

    Since Senator Modu Sheriff’s open disagreement with former President Goodluck Jonathan’s peace initiative and his sudden walkout on him in a crucial meeting, insisting on the resolution of the Peoples Democratic Party’s leadership crisis through court decision, top party leaders have been divided over the development even as some party elders continue to persuade Senator Ahmed Makarfi and Sheriff to save the party by accepting a political resolution.

    The argument, according to a former aide of one of the former Presidents on the ticket of PDP, is hinged on the discovery that none of the two contending factions of the party would be ready to continue with the party if it loses in the court. “I learnt the concerned elders have found out that whichever faction loses in the ongoing court battle will eventually leave the party. They found out that each of the factions has made Plan B, a development that is not good for the party. That is why the elders, who love this party, are urging the parties to come together and work in the interest of the party, instead of relying on a court verdict that will pronounce one of the contending factions, winner and the other, loser,” the source said.

    The Nation investigation shows that the week leading to the May 4 court sitting on the Sheriff and Makarfi’s leadership tussle, the matter was taken to virtually all the leaders of the party across the geo-political zones, some of who reached out to Sheriff and Makarfi but according to our source, “nothing came out of it.”

    He confided that every concerned elder of the party was therefore worried before May 4 court sitting, but with the long adjournment, I can confirm to you that concerned elements in the party are back in the field to seek amicable settlement of the crisis. One thing is certain; most of the elders are doing everything to convince the warring forces that it will do nobody any good to divide the family through a judicial pronouncement. A situation where we have a no winner, no loser resolution will help mend the broken relationship.”

    It would be recalled that the Supreme Court, on Thursday, adjourned the hearing on the objection filed by the court-backed National Chairman, Sheriff, against the appeal filed before the court by the Ahmed Makarfi’s faction of the party.

    The current legal battle is a follow-up on the ruling of a Port-Harcourt High Court, on February 27 affirming Sheriff as the party’s National Chairman. Reacting to the ruling, Makarfi’s faction had on March 16 filed an appeal before the apex court contending the ruling.

    So, on March 21, Sheriff filed an objection to the appeal, praying the apex court to strike out Makarfi’s appeal.

    One of Sheriff’s prayers to the apex court is a request to disqualify Makarfi’s faction from appealing the judgment of the Appeal Court. This request was heard and argued, but the court asked the counsels to submit written arguments before the next date of hearing. The case was adjourned till May 25, 2017 for further hearing.

    Divided house

    Since the PDP leadership contention shifted to the court, there have been both high wired intrigues to frustrate each of the factions and sharp disagreement amongst party members as to the end result of a resolution based on court pronouncement. For example, keen observers noted during the May court sitting that the original panel headed by Justice Ibrahim Tanko is no longer in charge of the case. Already, tongues are wagging, though mere change of a panel does not necessarily determine the outcome of a case at the Supreme Court.

    On whether or not an out of court resolution would be ideal, one of the top PDP leaders that have openly expressed belief that the matter would only be resolved through court ruling is the National Vice-Chairman (South-South) of Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Mr. Emmanuel Ogidi. According to him, “To tell you the truth, there will be no political solution to the problem, because there are so many grey areas.

    “If we didn’t take this to the Supreme Court, too many things would have come back to haunt the party, so it was wise we went to the court.

    “The political solution is just a family thing. Sometimes people think it can be easy, but in this case, there is no way.

    “That is why each time they keep saying let’s go for political solution, some of us know that it is going to be difficult and short-lived and therefore, look forward to the court verdict,” Ogidi said.

    Ogidi, who expressed reservation for the Appeal Court’s verdict added: “It is the Supreme Court judgment that we are waiting for. I believe it will do the right thing.

    “One man cannot call a convention and cancel it; no one is given such kind of power. Even the President does not have such power.”

    For those who believe that the political solution sought by former President Goodluck Jonathan was the best option, Sheriff’s sudden walkout at the meeting came as a rude shock. But Jonathan and some other elders of the party, desperate to restore the dignity of the once powerful ruling party, resolved not to give up but to seek more acceptable means of achieving the purpose. One of the ways was the inauguration of a 40-man Peace Initiative Committee, with the task of seeking what Jonathan described as a political solution to the leadership crisis.

    This plan could not fly as the Sheriff-led National Working Committee, which, like the Makarfi-led National Caretaker Committee, was supposed to nominate six of the 40-man committee members refused to be part of the arrangement.  Other proposed members of the peace committee were to include two former governors, two former ministers, two women and two youths, who were to be appointed in consultation with Sheriff and Makarfi committees.

    Sheriff’s deputy, Dr. Cairo Ojoughoh, who explained the position of the NWC said “That committee was not discussed with us. The meeting starts when the chairman of the party arrives and ends when he leaves.  Anything apart from that is null and void. People submit list to us.  We are not to submit list to anybody.  Our consultation continues. We are consulting with all the organs of the party.”

    Given that posture, there has been confusion as to how the elders would proceed in the peace initiative. While some argued that the Sheriff leadership holds the ace to PDP’s crisis and as such must be appeased before any tangible progress could be achieved, others said former President Jonathan and the elders working with him should ignore Sheriff and go ahead to inaugurate the proposed committee.

    “This has been the issue all through these weeks. The former president has been advised to go ahead and not allow any selfish element stop his noble intensions. But I am told by one of the elders involved in the matter that he is awaiting the conclusion of fresh negotiations with some select PDP elders before he would make public his next move,” said a source close to the former president.

    Even before Jonathan’s next moves are made public, we gathered that influential party leaders are now sharply divided, a development our source said is giving the elders great concern. “In one of the meetings held this week in Abuja, it became obvious to all that none of the factions seems ready to give in now,” he said, adding, “everybody is on his own, it seems as both supporters of Sheriff and Makarfi have refused to yield anything.”

    The division is no longer hidden as both factions easily reel out the governors and leaders in their camp. For example, Sheriff’s camp recently claimed it has more of the party’s governors in its camp than its rival faction led by Makarfi.

    Reports quoting Ojougbo, said out of PDP’s 11 state governors, the faction has undoubted support of five while the Makarfi faction can only boast of three governors’ full support.

    PDP governors include that of Delta, Akwa Ibom, Cross River, Bayelsa, Rivers, Ekiti, Ebonyi, Enugu, Abia, Taraba and Gombe States.

    He listed those with the Makarfi group as Ayo Fayose (Ekiti), Nyesom Wike (Rivers) and Ifeanyi Okowa (Delta).

    Ojougboh reportedly said, “The Ebonyi governor, the Enugu governor, the Taraba governor, the Cross River governor, the Bayelsa governor are one hundred per cent with us,” adding that “It is only Fayose, Wike and Okowa that are with Makarfi.

    Elders’ counsel

    Worried by the development PDP elders have been calling on the factions to eschew selfishness and help save the party

  • PDP crisis: Supreme Court to hear Makarfi’s appeal May 25

    PDP crisis: Supreme Court to hear Makarfi’s appeal May 25

    The Supreme Court will on May 25 hear the appeal filed by the Ahmed Makarfi faction of the People’s Democratic Party (PDP), challenging the judgment of the Court of Appeal, Port-Harcourt, which recognised Ali Modu Sheriff as the authentic chairman of the party.

    A five-man panel of the apex court, led by Justice Musa Datijo Mohammed, chose the date after granting leave to the 1st and 2nd respondents (Sheriff and PDP’s National Secretary, Adewale Oladipo) to regularise their processes.

    They were represented by Akin Olujinmi (SAN).

    The court equally agreed to hear on same date, a motion filed by the Sheriff-led leadership of the party, challenging the legitimacy of the appeal filed in the name of the PDP by the Makarfi faction, which had been sacked by virtue of the Appeal Court judgment.

    Thursday’s proceedings were witnesses by many stalwarts of the two factions fighting for the party leadership.

    The spacious courtroom was full to the brims.

    Those sighted by The Nation included Makarfi, Senator Ben Obi, Prof. Jerry Gana, a former Foreign Affairs Minister, Chief Tom Ikimi and the Spokesman for the Makarfi faction, Dayo Adeyeye.

     

  • PDP crisis: Sheriff plots membership registration ahead of convention

    PDP crisis: Sheriff plots membership registration ahead of convention

    •Dumps Dickson’s peace plan

    The Sheriff faction of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) is set to pull a fresh fast one on the rival Makarfi faction.

    It is plotting a membership registration update as it forges ahead with the planned national convention, it was gathered yesterday.

    It may also have concluded plans to dump the peace pact facilitated by the Governor Seriake Dickson reconciliation committee.

    Party sources said the Sheriff-led PDP resolved to carry out a fresh registration of party members ahead of the planned national convention which is expected to usher in a new leadership for the troubled opposition party.

    The decision was taken at a stakeholders’ meeting in Abuja attended by states chairmen.

    The move is part of the efforts of the faction to strengthen its hold on the structures of the party from the local government level to the national level.

    “It came as a suggestion from our state chairmen who thought there is need for the party to be returned to Nigerians,” a source said.

    “It was argued that the crisis took a toll on party membership at the grassroots level. The issue of serial defection of our members in recent times also came up. The issue is receiving serious attention from the relevant arms of the party. I can assure you that we will soon open our doors to Nigerians to come in and take their party back.

    “Since May 2015, the defection of PDP leaders and members to APC has taken place in all the 36 states of the federation. It is our fear that the defection of prominent PDP leaders will continue if we allow ourselves to be tied down by these deceptive peace moves and processes that had led us nowhere.

    “Our resolve it to forge ahead by doing everything necessary to reposition PDP. Senator Sheriff and other leaders of our party, having satisfied their conscience so far by giving listening ears to various forms of peace proposals, from the mundane to the serious, are now convoked that peace can only come from within the PDP, not from people being sponsored to destabilize us, but pretending to be part of us.”

    The convention is tentatively scheduled for June.

    The faction is also said to have decided to dump the peace deal worked out by the Dickson Committee.

    It was learnt that the party resolved to withdraw its participation in the peace process drawn up by the committee.

    Another source said:”Our position, as a party, is to move on with plans to host the convention. We are forging ahead with the process of giving our party a new leadership as soon as possible. “We also resolved not to be part of any reconciliation with any group or persons again. As far a s we are concerned, there is nothing to reconcile again. Genuine PDP members are with us and they are ready tom move on with us.

    “The meeting in Abuja which was attended by almost all our leaders from all the states put an end to our participation in the charade they call peace meetings. We now know that those meetings and parleys are designed to slow us down and keep the PDP in unnecessary crisis. I can tell you that there is no crisis in the PDP anymore.”

    But it appears the decision to back out of the peace deal was also taken at different fora, according to multiple sources.

    “Following series of strategic meetings by the leadership of the party with various interest groups and influential party leaders, including serving and former public office holders, many chieftains of the party who were, before now standing aloof while the two factions struggled for supremacy, have been recruited into the plan,” one of the sources said.

    “It is a general notion, as we speak, that we need to bring more people into the party, especially from the grassroots. The PDP, as conceived by our founding fathers, belong to the people. Having resisted the evil plan by a few persons masquerading as party leaders to hijack the PDP for selfish reasons, it is time to return the party to the people.”

  • PDP crisis: Makarfi chides Sheriff over attack on Jonathan, Wike

    PDP crisis: Makarfi chides Sheriff over attack on Jonathan, Wike

    THE Chairman of the Caretaker Committee of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Senator Ahmed Makarfi, has chided the courtbacked National Chairman of the party, Alhaji Ali Modu Sheriff, for attacking former President Goodluck Jonathan and the Rivers State Governor, Nyesom Wike. Sheriff had, at a media briefing in Abuja on Thursday, accused Jonathan of collecting N50 million from Wike to organise last week’s stakeholders’ meeting to reconcile warring factions in the PDP. Sheriff’s deputy, Dr. Cairo Ojougboh, addressed the media briefing. But at another media briefing in Abuja yesterday, Makarfi said it’s uncharitable for Sheriff and his camp to concoct deliberate falsehood aimed at impugning the character and public perception of the former president. In the text of the address read by the spokesman of the Caretaker Committee, Prince Dayo Adeyeye, the faction said it’s the height of lunacy for Sheriff and Ojougboh to allege that a person of Jonathan’s standing could be induced by anyone to organise a meeting. Makarfi said: “These people are pigs in the mud and they have no qualms in dragging decent people into the pit. “Our first reaction after reading the concoction put together by Cairo Ojugboh was to ig- Na’Abba blames Obasanjo for executive, legislature face-off Aformer Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Mr. Mohammed Bello Adoke( SAN), yesterday raised the alarm that the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) is planning to raid his home in Okene.

    He also said it is likely that the anti-graft agency might plant incriminating documents or cash in the house. Adoke, who cried out through a statement by his Media Officer, Mr. Victor Akhidenor, in Abuja said the EFCC was seeking evidence to indict him. The statement said: “We have been reliably informed of a plan by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) to raid the Okene, Kogi country home of Mohammed Bello Adoke (SAN), the former Minister of Justice and Attorney General of the Federation. “We gathered that the swoop on the country home of the former Attorney General and Minister of justice could happen any moment from now as part of the EFCC’s sustained campaign to soil the good name of Mr Adoke in the guise of seeking evidence to indict him. “It would be recalled that only last week, the EFCC invaded Adoke’s residence in Kano State, breaking doors, upturning chairs and tables and generally disturbing the peace of the neighbourhood. “They claimed they were looking for documents with which to substantiate their wild allegations of corruption against Mr Adoke. It did not find anything incriminating as there was no such document.

    “But that action alone has established one fact; that the EFCC had no shred of evidence on which it had charged Mr. Adoke to court. It was after charging him that they now started hunting around for evidence. Is this FORMER Speaker of the House of Representatives, Ghali Umar Na’Abba, has accused former President Olusegun Obasanjo of being behind the frosty relationship that has existed between the executive and legislature since the return to democratic rule in 1999. The former speaker said former President Obasanjo wanted what he described as a subjugated legislature, but met a stiff opposition in the House of Representatives. Speaking at a national conference on “Political Party Supremacy and the Dynamics of Parliamentary Autonomy” organised by the National Institute for Policy and Strategic Studies (NIPSS), the former speaker said the decision of former President Obasanjo to impose a leadership on the National Assembly and the resolve to fight back by the lawmakers are responsible for the relationship that has existed between the two arms of government since 1999.

    Tracing the origin of the crisis, Na’Abba said Obasanjo’s first step was to change the date of the inauguration of the National Assembly from June 3, 1999 to June 6 to allow him ample opportunity to manipulate the election of the Senate President, thus paving the way for the emergence of Evan Ewerem as Senate President instead of Chuba Okadigbo that was preferred by most senators. He said: “The action of June 3, 1999 by Obasanjo, the election of Ghali Na’Abba as speaker of the House of Representatives on July 22, 1999 and the election of Senator Chuba Okadigbo as Senate President convoluted to define the relationship between the legislature and the executive. “The relationship between the National Assembly and the executive arm became characterized by antagonism. It was clearly more than the necessary kind of friction which was desirous for the proper functioning of the legislature.” Also speaking, Prof. Jibrin Ibrahim also blamed the former President for the lack of party supremacy in the current political dispensation, pointing out that by declaring himself as the leader of the party, he succeeded in eroding the powers of the party to control their members.

    He said: “The original sin was committed in 1999 when the then newly elected President Olusegun Obasanjo declared himself the leader of the party, thereby usurping the power of the party chairman. “Once he did that, sitting governors in the state declared themselves party leaders at the levels. Party executives then became simple figureheads without real power or influence.” In his paper entitled ‘Political Party Supremacy and the Challenges of Executive and Legislative Relationship in Nigeria’, former Deputy Senate President, Ibrahim Mantu, said the Nigerian nation had seen the worst of all sorts of bad governance, pointing out that while there is corruption all over the world, the type of corruption in Nigeria “is uniquely different. There is an element of greed in our brand of corruption. In other words, we are greedily corrupt.” nore him since he is not an officer of the PDP. “But ignoring him may send wrong signal to the unsuspecting members of the public and members of our party, hence the need for this clarification.

    “Mr. Ojugboh in recent times has been making a series of unfounded and unsubstantiated allegations against major stakeholders of the PDP, especially those people his renegade group believes are seriously against the evil intention of Ali Modu Sheriff to destroy the only main opposition voice in the country, the PDP. “However, we are not surprised that Mr. Cairo would hallucinate and find pleasure in castigating Governors Nyesom Wike and Ayodele Fayose of Rivers and Ekiti states at every turn, but has never been able to utter a single word of criticism against their paymaster, the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC), despite its gross ineptitude and maladministration. “For the record, the last stakeholders’ meeting convened and chaired by former President Jonathan was not sponsored or organised by Governor Wike or Fayose as alleged by Mr. Cairo Ojugboh”.

    According to Makarfi, the need for the meeting was agreed upon at the residence of a former National Security Adviser (NSA), Gen. Aliyu Gusau, in the presence of Senator Ali Modu Sheriff, Professor Wale Oladipo, Senator David Mark, Senator Ahmed Makarfi and Senator Ben Obi. “Gen. Gusau and Senator Mark were mandated in that meeting to approach the former President to convene an all-inclusive meeting of stakeholders in order to chart a way forward for a lasting peace in the party”, Makarfi added. The Caretaker Committee expressed dismay at Sheriff’s penchant for blackmailing every available public institution in the country just to mislead the unsuspecting public. Makarfi continued, “Again, we wish to take serious exception to the baseless allegation made by Ojougboh that Governor Wike bribed the judiciary to get justice in the Rivers State governorship election at the Supreme Court. “This is another high point of rascality by the Sheriff renegade group and we have been reliably informed that the latest accusation against the judiciary is part of their calculated and clandestine plot to blackmail the justices of the Supreme Court.

    “They did the same to the justices of the Special Appeal panels during the Ondo State governorship election case when the panel, led by Justice Sankey, was falsely accused of collecting over N200 million from former Governor Olusegun Mimiko in November 2016. “We believe the judiciary and indeed all Nigerians are taking note of the antecedents of Senator Ali Modu Sheriff and co. as we urge the judiciary not to ignore such weighty allegations by this irritant group”. The Makarfi camp expressed satisfaction that the ongoing campaign by Sheriff to infiltrate the ranks of party members in the South East and South South was being spurned by key stakeholders. He stated that the PDP is not organising any campaign or rally in any part of the country at the moment and urge members to remain steadfast and continue to ignore any meeting called by Sheriff and his “doomsday naysayers”. According to him, there will be no elective national convention of the PDP as announced by Sheriff until the appeal pending before the Supreme Court is decided.

    He advised state chapters to ignore any directive from Sheriff regarding the convention. He also enjoined stakeholders to ignore the request made by Sheriff for state chapters to submit their lists of delegates on or before April 27 and his call for the National Executive Committee (NEC) meeting on May 3. The PDP, he said, will announce meetings of the various organs of the party at the appropriate time after due consultation with all stakeholders. “For the umpteenth time, we wish to reiterate that Senator Sheriff and co. are in defiance of the Court of Appeal order of status quo ante May 21, 2016 with self-appointed officers like Cairo Ojugboh. “Only three officers are with him, and, therefore, such NWC is non-existent. As for the deputy officers who shamelessly assumed offices as NWC members on the false claim of the purported resignation of the substantive officers, their comic action against the party speaks volume”. The Makarfi camp called on all organs and key stakeholders in the party nationwide to continue supporting the Caretaker Committee in moving the party forward. According to him, the only interest of the Caretaker Committee is the survival of the PDP against the “suffocating influence” of the ruling APC.

  • Sheriff to Fayose: Quit PDP now

    Sheriff to Fayose: Quit PDP now

    The National Chairman of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Ali Modu Sheriff, has told the Ekiti State governor, Ayodele Fayose, to leave the party as he was responsible for the crisis rocking the party.

    The PDP chairman, who spoke with journalists after a visiting the party secretariat in Calabar, Cross River, said Fayose’s exit would bring peace to the party.

    According to Sheriff, Fayose was the only PDP governor causing crisis in the party.

    He described the Ekiti governor as a loner who was acting a script of his “benefactor” to wreck the PDP.

    Sheriff advised Fayose to quickly announce his exit from the PDP, so the party can get peace and properly prepare for the 2019 general elections.

    The PDP chairman said, “He (Fayose) cannot speak for the southwest PDP. The southwest PDP that I know cannot allow the likes of Fayose to be speaking for them.

    “Fayose is alone and he is speaking for himself not the PDP of southwest. He is the only governor that is causing problem among the 12 PDP governors that we have today.

    “If he wants to leave the party, he should go and there will be peace in the PDP because he is the architect of the crisis in our party.

    “For the record, all the southwest PDP chairmen and their leaders are with me. So where is Fayose getting his support base from? He is a alone and he’s just playing the script of his author. He should go if he wants.”

     

     

     

     

  • PDP crisis: ‘Those supporting Makarfi are lawless’

    PDP crisis: ‘Those supporting Makarfi are lawless’

    The court-backed National Vice Chairman (Southwest) of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Makanjuola Ogundipe, has said nobody in the party can stop justice for impunity to thrive.

    Ogundipe, who addressed reporters yesterday in Ado-Ekiti, Ekiti State capital, said Governor Ayo Fayose and other PDP chieftains supporting the National Caretaker Committee Chairman, Senator Ahmed Makarfi, “are lawless individuals whose stock in trade is impunity”.

    Reacting to a factional Southwest zonal meeting hosted on Tuesday and presided over by factional zonal chair, Dr Eddy Olafeso, at Ado-Ekiti Government House, the PDP chieftain stressed that Sheriff remained the party’s National Chairman, as affirmed by the court.

    He said those in the Makarfi faction only wanted to hijack the party for their selfish ambition.

    But Ogundipe said such people had their hopes dashed as the Court of Appeal recognised Sheriff and his National Working Committee (NWC) as the executives empowered by law to run the party.

    The former Ekiti PDP Chairman, under whose tenure Fayose won the 2014 governorship election, said the party’s leaders and other Southwest residents recognised Sheriff “and will always give him support”.

    He said: “The law-abiding people in the Southwest recognise Sheriff as the PDP National Chairman and so will always give him support. Sheriff is preaching peace and moving the party forward in the face of all adversities.

    “As the national chairman, he has not stopped at repositioning the party. He is busy reconciling party members to ensure that peace reigns. He is calming frayed nerves and appealing to those who are still aggrieved about what happened in the recent past.

    “Those who are afraid of Sheriff in the Southwest PDP are probably those who think their selfish manipulations will not be possible under Sheriff as the National Chairman. But they are entitled to their fears.

    “These people should not, because of their reasons, derail the political fortunes of many as we move to elections in Ekiti and Osun states.

    “The PDP has waited enough for the outcome of the Appeal Court judgment; it is only logical and politically sensible to allow peace and progress within the party

  • Why PDP leadership crisis lingers – Mark

    Why PDP leadership crisis lingers – Mark

    Former Senate president, Senator David Mark, has said the lingering leadership crisis in the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) remained unresolved because some of those involved do not come for reconciliation with open mind.

    Mark expressed worry that the leadership problem remained intractable “because some of the combatants are not coming with an open mind for reconciliation.”

    The former Senate president restated his resolve to remain in PDP no matter the odds following the uncertainty and the gale of defections affecting the party.

    Mark was said to have told PDP supporters at an expanded caucus meeting in Makudi, Benue State, on Monday that he was not moved by the gale of defections from the PDP to the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC).

    A statement issued by his Media Assistant, Paul Mumeh, quoted Mark as saying: “PDP will come out stronger from this crisis. Those cross carpeting have no direction. They have no respect for political ideology.

    “No matter the difficulties and challenges, I will remain in the PDP. I’m convinced about the party’s ideology to among other things, keep Nigeria united, progressive, peaceful and a nation where every citizen is free to live and pursue his or her legitimate ambition without fear of molestation or intimidation in any part before I joined in 1998.”

    He described unbridled defection from one party to another as a disservice to democracy.

    He said the only way to sustain the country’s democratic culture is to be “consistent with political ideology instead of dancing to the whims and caprices of any government in power.”

     

     

  • PDP crisis: Sheriff walks out on Jonathan, governors

    PDP crisis: Sheriff walks out on Jonathan, governors

    Efforts to find a political solution to the festering leadership crisis in the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) yesterday suffered a major setback.

    Court-backed National Chairman  Ali Modu Sheriff stormed out of a peace meeting convened by former President Goodluck Jonathan.

    At the meeting, which was chaired by Dr. Jonathan, were four of the party’s governors.

    Also there were the chairman of the Board of Trustees (BoT), Senator Walid Jibrin and other notable chieftains.

    Sheriff, who came into the Yar ‘Adua Centre, Abuja venue of the meeting long after Jonathan, the governors and other party chiefs had taken their seats, stormed out of the meeting at 4:25 pm.

    He disagreed with Jonathan on the meeting, saying he (Sheriff) remained the most senior member of the PDP and, as such, a meeting of that nature ought to have been convened by him.

    Visibly agitated Sheriff was more piqued by Jonathan’s refusal to allow him address the meeting in his capacity as the National Chairman.

    According to him, the meeting was at variance with the recommendations made by a reconciliation committee headed by Bayelsa State Governor Seriake Dickson.

    Speaking with reporters shortly after he quit the meeting with his team, Sheriff said he would not be party to any arrangement that seemed to deviate from the recommendation of the Dickson committee.

    His words: “We were here for PDP stakeholders meeting and the PDP has only one national chairman, which is Ali Modu-Sheriff. There is no PDP meeting that will take place under whatever arrangement that I will not open the session as national chairman. Today, I am the most senior member of this party.

    “I think Governor Dickson made a proposal for reconciliation. And we have accepted. Some people want to deviate from this programme, to bring agenda which was not part of it.

    “And as national chairman of the party, what I told you people in my office when Dickson brought the report is the only thing that we have agreed at this moment. And I will not be party for anybody using me to do another programme. I’m not going to be part of it.”

    Asked if he had not disrespected Jonathan by storming out of the meeting, Sheriff said he respected the former president but that respect  must be reciprocal. According to him, Jonathan should not have called the meeting without consulting him.

    Said he: “Well, I respect him but calling for the meeting. He is a former president. But as of today, I am the most senior member of the party.

    “Therefore, if I respect him, the respect must be reciprocated. You can’t call me for a meeting of PDP and say I cannot address the meeting as national chairman of the party.”

    Asked on the way forward, Sheriff said he was sticking with the Dickson recommendation, which proposed a national convention under his watch.

    “As the National Chairman, we move on.  We have a programme initiated by Dickson. And we are continuing with that. Anything outside that, I am not a party to it,” he said.

    In his opening address, Jonathan said he had been working with key party stakeholders back stage and that the meeting was his first major political outing since he left office about two years ago.

    He acknowledged the crisis that has plagued the party for almost two years, saying the development was not new in democracies the world over, including the United Kingdom (UK) and the United States (U.S.).

    Jonathan said: “I will like to point out that every election cycle throws up a challenge as well as opportunities for a political party; a test to re-evaluate its performance, and an opportunity to reform its processes and programmes towards rediscovering itself to become even more appealing to the electorate in its next outing.

    “It is obvious that some of our people see this development as not only disappointing but discouraging for our great party. Although I can understand this sense of loss, I always prefer to align myself with those who choose to see it differently, given the positive impact our conduct and disposition has had in deepening our democracy.

    “All over the world, political parties lose elections, not because they have entirely failed, but because, in most cases, the people who gave them power in the first place, have decided to hand it over to another party, in order to experience a different kind of leadership.

    “In Africa and other emerging democracies, the challenge has always been with the disposition of the party in power to allow the people the opportunity to freely exercise this right.

    “This obviously is the area where we have excelled. The fact that we allowed this process to take place peacefully, and freely handed over power to the opposition did not only lift the profile of our party, but also elevated our country to the status of one of the world’s stable and reliable democracies.

    “For this gesture alone, the whole world has continued to applaud our party and its leaders as icons of democracy on the continent.

    “We were able to achieve this because our government really reformed the electoral and political process, by giving the electoral bodies their true independence which subsequently opened up the political space for free and fair elections.

    “We may have had shortcomings while in power, but we also recorded significant achievements and great milestones. Through purposeful leadership, we reformed our institutions, rebuilt the nation’s confidence, regained international goodwill and rekindled hope in our people.”

    The former president encouraged the gathering not to despair over loss of power and enjoined them to make sacrifices by putting the interest of the PDP above their personal interests.

    Describing the PDP as a leading light in constitutional democracy, Jonathan said the party cannot be allowed to continue to drift, adding that the gathering was designed to stem the drift.

    He urged the stakeholders to bury their differences, to ensure a quick resolution of the leadership problems in the party, stressing that there is no sacrifice too big to make.

    Jonathan said a 40-member committee would be set up to finetune decisions taken at the meeting with a view to resolving all outstanding issues.

    He continued: “As politicians, with the zeal to lead our people, we must aspire to higher offices or identify the people we believe have leadership qualities and encourage them to aspire to those positions. But one thing is very clear: you cannot, as the polity is configured today, be elected into a higher office on the platform of a weak party.

    “We must all, therefore, work to rebuild the PDP and strengthen the party in line with the vision of our founding fathers, and the mission to continue to provide for the good of the people of our great country, valuable leadership in a stable democracy rooted in the rule of law.

    “We have to remind ourselves that the prolongation of the crisis in our party may have cost us so much in election fortunes, in recent time. The loss of Edo and Ondo gubernatorial elections is still fresh in our memory. It goes without saying that we cannot afford to have a repeat of that in the forthcoming elections in Anambra, Ekiti and Osun states.

    “It is high time we buried the hatchet, suppressed our ego and prepared to make sacrifices in the interest of our party and, in deed the country.

    “Our ambitions therefore must come second, otherwise we will only be building castles on quick sand. We must realise that, as they say, everybody is nobody without a platform. So, why destroy the platform?

    “I urge our teeming members to remain steadfast and continue to believe in the PDP. As I said earlier, it is true that we suffered a setback in 2015, but the fact remains that the PDP is still the largest party in our dear country.

    “There is no doubt that the PDP will emerge from this moment of trial to regain its position as the greatest party on our continent.”

    At the meeting were Governors Ayo Fayose (Ekiti), Nyesom Wike (Rivers) and Darius Ishaku (Taraba). Deputy Governors of Gombe and Ebonyi states were also there.

    Others at the meeting were the chairman of the party’s Caretaker Committee, Senator Ahmed Makarfi, Prince Uche Secondus, Olisa Metuh, among others.

    Dickson was among the party’s governors who did not attend the meeting and were not represented by their deputies.

  • PDP crisis: Sheriff walks out on Jonathan, governors, others

    PDP crisis: Sheriff walks out on Jonathan, governors, others

    Ongoing efforts to find political solution to the festering leadership crisis in the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) suffered a huge setback on Thursday.

    The court backed National Chairman of the party, Alhaji Ali Modu Sheriff, stormed out of a peace meeting convened by former President Goodluck Jonathan.

    The meeting which was chaired by Jonathan, had about four PDP governors in attendance, including the Chairman of the Board of Trustees (BoT), Senator Walid Jibrin and other notable chieftains.

    Sheriff, who came into the Yar ‘Adua Centre venue of the meeting long after Jonathan, the governors and other prominent party chiefs had taken their seats, stormed out of the meeting at 4:25 p.m.

    The party chairman disagreed with Jonathan on the meeting, saying he (Sheriff) remained the most senior member of the PDP and as such, a meeting of that nature ought to have been convened by him.

    The visibly agitated Sheriff was more piqued by Jonathan’s refusal to allow him address the meeting in his capacity as the national chairman of the party.

    According to him, the meeting was at variance with the recommendations made by a reconciliation committee, headed by the Bayelsa State Governor, Seriake Dickson.

    Speaking with journalists shortly after he stormed out the meeting with his team, Sheriff said he would not be party to any arrangement that seemed to deviate from the recommendation of the Dickson committee.

    He said, “We were here for PDP stakeholders’ meeting and the PDP has only one national chairman, which is Ali Modu-Sheriff. There is no PDP meeting that will take place under whatever arrangement that I will not open the session as national chairman. Today, I am the most senior member of this party.

    “I think Governor Dickson made a proposal for reconciliation. And we have accepted. Some people want to deviate from this programme, to bring agenda which was not part of it.

    “And as national chairman of the party, what I have told you people in my office when Dickson brought the report is the only thing that we have agreed at this moment. And I will not be party for anybody using me to do another programme. I’m not going to be part of it.”

    Asked if he had not disrespected Jonathan by storming out of the meeting, Sheriff said he respects the former President but that respect must be reciprocal.

    According to him, Jonathan should not have called the meeting without consulting him.

    He added: “Well, I respect him but calling for the meeting. He was a former President. But as of today, I am the most senior member of the party.

    “Therefore if I respect him, the respect must be reciprocated. You can’t call me for a meeting of PDP and say I cannot address the meeting as national chairman of the party.”

    Asked on the way forward, Sheriff said he was sticking with the Dickson recommendation, which proposed a national convention under his watch.

     

  • PDP crisis: Sheriff, Makarfi bicker over attempts to sack secretariat workers

    PDP crisis: Sheriff, Makarfi bicker over attempts to sack secretariat workers

    The Ali Modu Sheriff and Ahmed Makarfi factions of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) are locked in a fresh face-off, this time over the planned recruitment of staff for the party by the Sheriff faction.

    The Makari camp is resisting the planned recruitment.

    All the staff at the PDP national secretariat are refusing to work with Sheriff.

    They have rebuffed all overtures from the faction to return to work, preferring to work for the Makarfi camp.

    Consequently, the Sheriff faction recently invited applications from interested Nigerians to come and fill vacant administrative positions at the party’s national secretariat.

    Makarfi has protested that the move negates the agreement brokered between the two camps on Thursday by Governor Seriake Dickson.

    However, in a telephone chat with our correspondent yesterday, Sheriff’s deputy, Dr. Cairo Ojougboh said the said recruitment exercise has nothing to do with the peace deal.

    He said: “The people employed at the secretariat staff have since left the party.

    “We did not sack them. Rather they, on their own, went on AWOL (Absence Without Official Leave).

    “We have asked them to resume duties but they have refused. They said they are waiting for the judgment of the Supreme Court but we cannot continue to wait for them.

    “They have become a clog in the wheel of progress of the party.

    “We are going ahead to replace them. Makarfi should respect himself and stay out of this because it has nothing to do with him.

    “We are the ones running the party and they are supposed to be there as employees of the party. The recruitment exercise does not in any way affect the peace deal brokered by Governor Dickson.”

    But in a swift reaction, the spokesman for the Caretaker Committee, Prince Dayo Adeyeye, who also spoke with our correspondent on telephone, said the move constituted a breach of the peace agreement.

    According to him, the staff have been working with the Caretaker Committee and will continue to do so until the Supreme Court makes a final pronouncement on the leadership of the party.

    He warned Sheriff against heightening tension in the party, adding that one of the major planks of the political solution to the crisis was to maintain the status quo in respect of the secretariat staff.

    Adeyeye said, “The staff are working with us in line with the deal brokered by Governor Dickson and nobody can replace them.

    “We are all waiting for the outcome of the Supreme Court on the matter because they were working with us before the February 17 judgement of the Appeal Court.

    “Why should they go and work with Sheriff while the case is still pending before the Supreme Court? If you are looking for political solution, then you should not heighten tension.

    “The right thing to do while looking for political solution is to maintain the status quo. You don’t go out heightening tension when you are seeking political solution.

    “Sheriff and his group must keep to the terms of the agreement for peace to reign because we are going to resist any attempt to victimise the workers”.

    Adeyeye had, in a statement on Friday, that there is no accord in place between the Makarfi faction and the Sheriff camp.

    He said the only area of agreement is that the two sides will withhold fire in the media for now.

    He said reports that they have reached a ‘political solution’ is not true, stressing that they only agreed before the Governor Dickson’s reconciliation committee  to “stop further media attacks on officers, elders and other stakeholders of the PDP across the internal political divide.”

    He added: “For the record, the agreement was not a political solution but rather an understanding reached urging representatives of ‘the key actors’ from both groups not to dissipate energy amongst themselves but to focus on how to unite as a formidable force capable of re-gaining power from the failed All Progressive Congress (APC)-led government in the 2019.

    “The agreement also implores both parties to desist from making public derogatory remarks against each other that could cause inflammatory reactions capable of dragging the party to the mud.”

    Adeyeye added that the national caretaker committee and all the organs of the party are working with the reconciliation committee to reach a lasting political solution.