Tag: PDP

  • PDP: Time to face reality

    In the last elections, the Peoples Democratic Party, (PDP), the party that has ruled the country for 16 years since the advent of the Fourth Republic in 1999, was disgraced at the polls by the rival opposition party, the All Progressives Congress, APC. That scandalous defeat of a ruling party that had boasted to high heavens that it was capable of ruling the country for at least 60 unbroken years has now almost torn the party into shreds. The defeat, though much expected by political pundits, seems to have caught those at the helms of affairs in the party by surprise. Now, the party bigwigs are enthralled in a trajectory of sleepless nights.

    The party is currently embroiled in a crisis of confidence which has reached a boiling point. At the centre of the crisis is the national chairman of the party, Adamu Mu’azu,  on the one hand, and other members of the National Working Committee, NWC, who have come under tremendous pressure to abdicate office on account of the poor showing of the party in the last elections. Many of the aggrieved party members including some state governors are united in the clamour for the party leaders to leave the scene. But the leaders have vowed not to cave in without a fight.

    As usual, the media is awash with accusations and counter-accusations. While the accusations are predicated on why the leaders should throw in the towel after leading the party to a disastrous defeat in the elections, the leaders themselves are holding on to the constitution of the party which empowers them to be in office until the next national convention of the party which comes up in a year or two from now. But the warring members think this is mere balderdash. The consequence of this is that both sides are, at the moment, holding on to their gunpowder.

    As the May 29 handover date approaches, senior members of the party comprising governors and associates of President Goodluck Jonathan have perfected a grand plan to ratchet up the pressure on Mu’azu. The governors and Jonathan’s closest aides have been in a long-drawn battle with the NWC with both sides trading blames over who was (more) responsible for the party’s poor outing at the just-concluded elections. Top on the list are allegations of betrayal and diversion of campaign funds which are being peddled by both sides. Not even the president’s directive that the warring members should stop trading words in the media because it could escalate the crisis the party is facing, has been able to douse the raging storm. The president’s charge has simply been largely ignored.

    The fact remains that the governors and Jonathan’s trusted aides who are up in arms, seem to have vowed that they would not stay in the same party with either Mu’azu or members of the NWC as presently constituted. The issue seems to have been aggravated by the outcome of the recent elections in Britain. In the aftermath of the elections, those rooting for the removal or resignation of the PDP leaders have been justifying their stance against the backdrop of the resignations of leaders of the Labour Party, Liberal Democrats and others in the United Kingdom following the failings of the parties at the UK general election which was held towards the tail end of last week.

    In what looks like a confirmation of the high-level resolution and determination of some of the PDP governors and party leaders to see to Mu’azu’s exit, Babangida Aliyu, the loquacious governor of Niger State, has joined Ayodele Fayose, his Ekiti State counterpart, in urging the NWC to emulate the British political leaders who resigned after leading their parties to defeat in last Thursday’s election.  Aliyu said any leader that leads his political party to defeat as it was in the case of PDP, is supposed to resign. As he puts it: “It is unfortunate that people had to be called to resign. The leaders are supposed to voluntarily resign their positions for the loss at the just concluded general election. It is unfair that they are threatening to form a factional PDP because they were asked to resign”. The governor noted that morality and principle were key attributes the PDP must imbibe to succeed for future elections, adding that what happened in the United Kingdom election last Thursday was a reflection of morality and principle, which must be brought to the Nigerian polity.

    In the last eight years of Aliyu’s stewardship as the governor of Niger State, he has consistently portrayed himself as a man who fires from all cylinders. Sometimes, he gets himself entangled in unnecessary and avoidable controversies. In this recent outburst, what Governor Aliyu fails to understand is that morality and principle have never been found in the DNA of the average politician in Nigeria. In other words, it is alien in this clime. Aliyu himself alluded to this many months back at the heat of the electioneering campaigns when he openly declared that there are no saints in politics, although he was to recant this later in the face of a deluge of criticism that greeted that speech.

    With the accusation of the embezzlement of campaign funds and the ease with which Nigerian politicians jump from one party to another like a woman changing wrappers, it is clear that there is nothing like morality or principle among them. Even the current crisis in which the PDP leadership is enmeshed is due to the fact that the leaders involved are either shameless or they lack principles and morality. Mu’azu and the others at the hierarchy of the party may hold on to their offices by hook or crook for the time being, but it is certain that come what may, they would soon be flushed out from their present comfort zones because they have failed to provide the needed leadership when it matters most. And there are no two ways about that.

    However, one thing that is clear is that the APC, a rainbow coalition of opposition parties that had been on the sidelines of national politics for the past 16 years, has learnt a lot from its seemingly weak position of yester-years and therefore, converted these weaknesses to strength through well-thought out and good campaign. The party’s victory did not come overnight. It is the climax and reward for a painstaking campaign at a time the people were crying for a change in the leadership of the country.

    Winning elections is certainly one of the things any political party will always wish for. But sometimes, it is not as simple as that. In every election, for the winners, it is a beautiful thing to behold; as for the losers, it inflicts a permanent nightmare of sort. That is, perhaps, the situation in which the PDP as the losing party at the last election, has suddenly found itself. Surprisingly, as it is, there appear to be too many contending interests in the party, all jostling to take control of the moribund party machinery. With the current fratricidal war in the PDP, it is doubtful if any lesson has been learnt at all from the party’s unimpressive outing in the last elections. Already, the party is seriously polarized along primordial lines. The major challenge now facing the party is to prevent itself from imminent extinction. Therefore, my unsolicited advice is for the party to quickly close ranks and settle down to its new role as an opposition party rather than crying over spilled milk.

    For a party that has over the years been calling the shots and dictating the tune, playing opposition may be quite a difficult task. The truth is that the party leaders should realise that the merriment is simply over!

    ‘With the current fratricidal war in the PDP, it is doubtful if any lesson has been learnt at all from the party’s unimpressive outing in the last elections’

     

  • Bickering not in the interest of PDP, says Mu’azu

    •Party chairman: I’m abroad on medical advice

    THE National Chairman of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Alhaji Adamu Mu’azu, has appealed to stakeholders and members of the party to put behind them the disappointment of defeat and misunderstandings.

    He advised the party faithful to put the survival and stability of the party ahead of all other considerations.

    Mu’azu, who spoke in a statement yesterday, said though the party’s defeat in the last general election was painful, members should key into the intervention by President Goodluck Jonathan and not allow the situation to further divide the party.

    The statement said: “The national leadership of the PDP has noted the various reactions that trailed the unfortunate loss of our great party in the last general elections.

    “In the last few weeks, the media have been fishing on these reactions with a section even blowing it out of proportion to a level that has become a threat to our oneness as a family.

    “As the national chairman and a key stakeholder in this party in the last 16 years, I quite understand and appreciate the concern, pain and frustrations of our members regarding our defeat.

    “I am also deeply worried about the division the development has generated within the PDP family, especially regarding whether or not the national leadership should be dissolved as a direct consequence of our collective challenge.

    “In the course of events, there have been reactions and counter-reactions among party members; mistakes have been made, some of them avoidable. But this is the time to put all of them behind us and move ahead as our party and its interest remain paramount and overriding.

    “Expectedly, our party has had a share of media bashing and misrepresentations, which contributed immensely to the misunderstanding we are facing in our fold.

    “For instance, in one of the press reactions from my office, the media quoted one of my aides as saying that our party will be “buried’ without the National Chairman, a clear deviation from what was actually said. Such misrepresentations of our party leaders also abound in the social media and we must be wary of them.

    “However, I have already issued a strong warning to all my aides to henceforth desist from making comments on matters of party administration in the media or any other forum whatsoever.

    “Having been a state governor on the platform of this party for eight years and having the grace of being a committed member for the past 16 years, I very much appreciate the reactions of some of our members like Governor Ayo Fayose, whose victory in Ekiti in June last year helped to strengthen our party, particularly in the Southwest region.

    “Nevertheless, in the larger interest of our party, we all must resolve to bury the hatchet, pick our pieces and move on to rebuild our party and return to our winning ways.

    “In the wisdom of leadership of the party, we have set the machinery in motion by the constitution and inauguration of the Post Election Assessment Committee headed by the Deputy Senate President, Senator Ike Ekweremadu.

    “The needful thing to do at the moment is for all hands to be on the deck with this committee to come up with meaningful report that will provide answers to our challenges and roadmap for the future.

    “Furthermore, my absence from the country lately has led to some apprehensions within the party resulting in various public interpretations. But the fact is, following the rigorous campaigns and its attendant toll on my health, I had to yield to the advice of my doctor to take a two-week bed rest for proper checks and recuperation. I am happy to inform all our members that I have been responding to care and will soon return to the country.

    “Finally, I wish to charge all members that though we have had our setback, we are not down and out. The PDP remains the largest political party in this country. What we need now more than ever before is to unite as therein lies our strength as a family.

    “Fighting ourselves will not yield anyone any good. Our members, therefore, must remain focused and join forces with their leaders at all levels to actualise our collective quest to rebuild the PDP and reposition it to regain power in 2019”.

     

  • Election: PDP worried over Rivers, Delta, A/Ibom

    Election: PDP worried over Rivers, Delta, A/Ibom

    The leadership of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) has expressed apprehension over its electoral victories in Rivers, Delta and Akwa Ibom States, as the All Progressives Congress (APC) challenges the results at the tribunals.

    At a media briefing in Abuja on Tuesday, PDP’s National Publicity Secretary, Chief Olisa Metuh, said it’s worrisome that even in victory, the APC has remained desperate in the desire to be in total control of the polity by attempting to take over the states genuinely won by the PDP.

    “You will recall that we had earlier alerted Nigerians to a groundswell of plots by the APC to foist a one party rule in our country by attempting to destabilise the PDP, take over some of our states and legislative seats, all to ensure that there is no strong opposition when they eventually assume power.

    “As we speak, APC has resorted to instigating crisis, inciting the people while mobilising resources to arm-twist the judiciary, ostensibly to torpedo the will of the people in these states.

    “In particular, our findings show that in Delta, Rivers and Akwa-Ibom States, the APC machinery is working round the clock to ensure that it upturned the victory of the PDP and the mandate freely given to us by the people in these states,” Metuh said.

    The party claimed to be aware of clandestine moves by the APC to procure and compromise some stakeholders in the elections, including the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) and security personnel to bear false witness and doctor electoral materials against the PDP at the tribunal.

    “This is in addition to sponsoring negative publications in some section of the media, laced with false claims and distortion of election figures to suit their nefarious plans of swaying public opinion and the course of justice against our party in these states.

    “We know that the main aim behind APC’s desperation to take over these three states is their belief that they are strategic to the PDP and that taking them away will further weaken and undermine our party and accelerate the quest for a one-party state in our country.

    “However, the PDP wishes to state in very clear terms that we will not accept any attempt by anybody whatsoever, especially the APC to manipulate the process and rob us of our clear victories in these states or any other state for that matter,” Metuh added.

    The party warned the APC not to take its civility, “driven by patriotic zeal” for peace, unity and harmony in the country for granted, adding that its members across the country were willing and ready to defend the party’s mandate in the three states, using all available instruments within the ambit of the law.

    Metuh continued: “As a party that has made history by nurturing democracy for 16 years, and elevating it to a standard appreciated by the democratic community the world over, we cannot fold our hands and watch while the gains are being undermined by the APC and its agents.

    “It is on this note that the PDP draws the attention of the judiciary, INEC and security authorities to the heinous scheme by the APC to drag their institution and men into these criminal plots.

    “In view of the above therefore, we urge these institutions to closely monitor its officials involved in the elections and do everything within the law to safeguard their reputation against the acts of a few greedy and dubious individuals.

    “Finally, while we note that the APC should be held responsible should there be any breakdown of law and order in Rivers, Delta and Akwa-Ibom States, we charge the people not to relent but to stand up and defend their mandates and use all means allowed by the law to ensure that their will, expressed through the ballot box is not thwarted by desperate and greedy enemies of democracy.”

  • Re: PDP must not be allowed to die

    SIR: I read Habib Aruna’s insightful opinion piece with the above title published in The Nation of April 26. There are yet grey areas not covered by his enlightening essay chiefly as it relates to the former National Chairman of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) Vincent Ogbulafor.

    Why did the former PDP chairman say that the PDP will rule Nigeria for 60 years? And why was he duplicitously divested of his office for challenging the power that be, truthfully as widely reported?

    I see Vincent Ogbulafor in my mind’s eye as an unpretentious statesman for recognizing the importance of rotational presidency –  the same way I respect Ogbonnaya Onu for his loyalty and firm political principles.

    Back then the PDP buttressed the principle of rotation of elective office with gusto and Ogbulafor openly defended this principle ( a panacea for peace), and as reported – he even asked, the national leader of his party not to seek election – because he reasoned, that his ambition would upstage the zoning formula and leave many people in the party hot under the collar. We heard he was removed for that.

    The recent defeat of that party might not have been possible if the leaders had not eschewed party principles to settle for crony democracy and it is not unconnected to the cancellation of rotational presidency.

    In Nigeria we look at perfect or near perfect situations and advocate it for our peculiar circumstance. Rotational presidency is needed today but not forever to keep this nation at peace and united.

    Right now we are at, ‘let there be peace, cohesion and unity’ level, and we need to begin from where we are. This isn’t suggesting that we throw up total turkeys for elective office, people who are conflict-ridden political figures with no history. We seek nationalists who know the challenges of our national statehood and know what it takes to do the ‘will of state.’

    The PDP, like Ogbulafor prophesied, might have ruled for so many years even if not up to 60 years had the party not underrated the APC. I watched the national leader prior to the election say on national television, “after this election you will know that the APC is overrated”. Had the party patched up the differences with aggrieved governors, avoided nuptials to some people who were only interested in fattening their interests, followed the “the rule of right,” instead of  the “rule of might” and reached out to all others to win national goals instead of settling for the “love for power” and not “power to love”, Ogbulafor’s prophesy may have had firm grounds to stand.

    Imagine the power sharing arrangement in Delta State where PDP candidates from Urhobo have tasted power (James Ibori), Itsekiri (Emmanuel Uduaghan), and now Delta North (Senator Arthur Okowa). That state with this power-sharing arrangement will witness peace. You follow?

    Contrast that to Rivers State, where you have an outgoing Ikwerre governor and an in-coming Ikwerre governor and you wonder why the same party as in Delta has different rules of engagement for different states.

    Today supporters of the PDP are asking Nigerians to push the boat out to recognize their national leader as an international statesman for conceding victory to the APC in the general elections. What choice does any evenhanded president have other than to concede defeat in a democratic contest? Shouldn’t that be the standard of civilized democrats. It is time we began to promote the norm instead of the exception in our polity.

    How many presidents in the West were hero worshipped just for conceding defeat to the opposition? Do they hero worship democratic leaders in Botswana?

    The resignation of Adamu Muazu as Chairman of the PDP as advised by Habib Aruna is not the answer to the glut of problems facing PDP at the moment. The party members need to work on the philosophy of equity, justice and fairness – they must refrain from the uncontrolled public bickering by top wigs of the party which today make news headline.

    • Simon Abah,

    Port Harcourt.

  • PDP’s moment of angst

    PDP’s moment of angst

    Led by the vituperative and mendacious Ekiti State governor, Ayo Fayose, many top Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) officials have started to call for the heads of their party’s National Working Committee (NWC) members, especially that of the party chairman Adamu Mu’azu. Perhaps they will have the heads on a platter. But without needing to be sympathetic to the PDP chairman, it is well known that Mr Fayose lied when he said he had evidence the embattled chairman was in league with the All Progressives Congress (APC) during the last polls to bring President Goodluck Jonathan’s reelection project to grief. Mr Fayose is a disturbed mind; he will rock the boat of his party for as long as he remains either in the party or as a governor. The accusations and counteraccusations between leading PDP officers came moments after both Dr Jonathan and Senate President David Mark futilely warned that unrestrained acrimony could destroy the party.

    Opponents and haters of the PDP have exulted over the destructive rage going on within the party. They surmised gleefully that all it took to unnerve the self-styled largest party in Africa was just one loss, a loss that has now so discomfited the party that it is sundering dangerously at the seams. They observe that such bitter and acrimonious fights are symptomatic of a defeated organisation, be it a country or a political party. Some PDP members, including Mr Fayose, have latched on to that logic by suggesting that it is customary for party officials who lead their parties to defeat to fall on their swords and give way for the emergence of new leadership. Their arguments are reinforced by the quick resignation that rocked the losing parties in last week’s British election. Alhaji Mu’azu and his colleagues on the NWC, however, retort that the provisions of the PDP’s constitution, unlike the post-election convention in Britain, are clear on how leadership changes should be effected.

    It will be naive to expect that the battle to enthrone new leaders in the PDP would cease simply because some concerned party leaders admonish their colleagues to embrace peace and think altruistically of the best interests of their distressed party. The PDP is unaccustomed to defeat. They will need to establish a convention, sans their party constitution, on how to behave in victory and defeat. We are fairly conversant with how they celebrate victory, and how the spoils of war are shared among them. How they mourn or cope with defeat, however, remains the grey area of their party culture. Dr Jonathan himself, in descending on his appointees with the fanatical zeal of the Spanish inquisition, axing and beheading those who crossed his emotions and drew his brittle ire, appears to be laying a curious, somewhat malevolent precedent. With practised ease, almost as if he had forgotten he would be vacating office in less than three weeks, he has also appointed new state officials. He is unconcerned about what his successor might do to or with his last minute appointees.

    The internal battles within the PDP may get worse before they get better. With men like Mr Fayose in the PDP, unscrupulous, impertinent and acerbic, the party will be constantly roiled by brutal internecine conflicts to assert hegemony. And with men like Alhaji Mu’azu who can call their souls their own, there will be no let in the war. Alhaji Mu’azu and his colleagues will give much more than they can take, and they will also be unsparing. But no matter how vicious the war, the bone of contention, to wit, who is to blame for the defeat, will never be resolved. Even a harmonised, face-saving and fence-mending sitting of the combative officials is unlikely to produce peaceful resolutions or agreements. The next few weeks, full of figurative bloodletting and bitter recriminations, will be the PDP’s greatest moment of angst.

    Both sides to the PDP war are of course wrong to presume, judging from their analyses and what they have said, that they appreciate the real reasons for the PDP’s woeful performance. Mr Fayose’s vindictive scaremongering is of course far from the truth. Neither Alhaji Mu’azu nor any other PDP NWC member schemed against his own party. They might wish that the PDP should not be rewarded for hateful campaigns, given the portentous electioneering embarked upon by divisive and petulant characters like Femi Fani-Kayode, Doyin Okupe, Mr Fayose himself, and more tellingly Dame Patience Jonathan. But it would be far-fetched to argue that the urbane leaders of the party actually worked for the APC’s victory. It may also be true that some northern leaders of the PDP, particularly governors, pulled their punches in the campaigns, but it is unlikely they did so simply because they loved the opposition or their candidates, especially Gen Buhari. Given the context in which the March and April elections were held, particularly the northern milieu, there was little any PDP leader in that region could have done to stymie the revolutionary momentum unleashed by the candidature of Gen Buhari.

    Conversely, too, it will be simplistic to suggest that hate speeches and campaigns alone undid the PDP and doomed Dr Jonathan’s reelection chances. While hate campaigns contributed immensely towards the failure of the party, the voting pattern in the last polls suggests quite clearly that a number of other factors were responsible for the revolutionary outcomes never before witnessed in these parts.

    Rather than bicker, and because the country needs a virile, sensible and credible opposition, the PDP must be encouraged to engage in hard-nosed analyses of why they failed. There is nothing wrong in the ongoing internecine battles within the PDP continuing for a little while. These battles are needed to enable the party produce real and intelligent leaders for the next four years of its life, at least in the first instance. Once produced, the new leaders will impose discipline on the party, restore unity, and redirect the party to work for and achieve realistic goals and salient objectives. While the party will need to sanitise its internal mechanisms and codify its methods and values, there is little doubt it will also need internal opposition, the kind vaguely represented by Mr Fayose. But the party and its new leaders will have to determine whether Mr Fayose is not a dangerous and needless throwback to atavism.

    It is not immediately clear to outsiders who among the many claimants to the PDP leadership is suited for the party’s next decade. It needs party philosophers, but we cannot immediately see any in its ranks. It needs a disciplinarian, but the sensible, disciplined and moderate Alhaji Muazu has a chink in his armour by reason of the defeat it was his lot to lead the party. It needs new values, new sets of beliefs and programmes, and new national focus, but we cannot see anyone enunciating, projecting and championing these. And until they produce great men and leaders who can aggregate these principles and values whatever wars they fight will only bathe their party in blood rather than the revitalising elixir sorely needed to move the party forward and offer credible and toughened opposition to the victorious and fairly more ideological APC.

    By all means then, let us encourage the soul-searching and war of attrition going on in the PDP. No one takes perverse delight in weakening or destroying the PDP. The fact is that the country needs a strong PDP; but this new PDP will not come without the party passing through the furnace in order for itself and its ideas to be refined. The process of renewal and rebirth is not of course inevitable. If it chooses to bicker to the death rather than be refined to a new life, then perhaps a new party, rather than the PDP, would be needed altogether.

  • PDP must earn right to criticise Buhari

    PDP must earn right to criticise Buhari

    “Many in the ruling party still cannot reconcile themselves with what has just happened: they are handing over the reins to the man they disdained and they just can’t stop the habit of sniping at him. This is the campaign that never ended, and the attacks would continue whether or not they are reasonable or morally justified.” 

    I overheard a conversation between two men on a street that captures the magnitude of the burden inherited by President-elect Muhammadu Buhari. It went something like this:

    Mr. A: “Why e come be say now wey your man (Buhari) don win naim we dey suffer dis kain thing? No light, no petrol, no money… Na so una dey shout change, change … him don win now see wahala!”

    Mr. B: Haba! But Jonathan is still in charge, Buhari never take over now!”

    Mr. A: “Look … we no go gree o!” And their voices tapered off in the distance.

    In stunned silence I digested what I had just heard. The size of the challenge confronting the next administration is gargantuan, but it is compounded by so much ignorance on the part of a longsuffering population who now expect their newly-minted leader to brandish a wand and sweep their troubles away. If only this was wonderland!

    Buhari’s assignment is complicated by the bitterness factor. The Peoples’ Democratic Party (PDP) was unprepared for the loss of the presidency. Party spokesman aptly described his organization as ‘traumatized’.

    Many in the ruling party still cannot reconcile themselves with what has just happened: they are handing over the reins to the man they disdained and they just can’t stop the habit of sniping at him. This is the campaign that never ended, and the attacks would continue whether or not they are reasonable or morally justified.

    That the PDP is in disarray after its calamitous electoral performance is to be expected. The scope of the debacle is such that the party which has been in power for an unbroken 16-year stretch would be would be psychologically damaged for a long time.

    Up North it has been virtually wiped out by Hurricane Buhari. In the South West it is standing on two shaky legs in Ondo and Ekiti. These outposts are bound to come under sustained pressure from the new governing party after May 29.

    In the South South and South East zones it faces an uncertain future. Electoral litigation and potential defections are bound to erode its holdings in these areas.

    In Abuja, national chairman Ahmadu Muazu and members of his National Working Committee (NWC) are exchanging brickbats with aides and associates of President Goodluck Jonathan over the defeat while crossing swords with governors who want them sacked.

    But no matter how bad things look for PDP at the moment, the worst is yet to come. In the next few months as the new government begins a forensic examination of the Jonathan years we should expect more embarrassing scandals to be unveiled as whistleblowers – long restrained by the fear of the outgoing government – begin to sing.

    The savage in-fighting that has already kicked off is not going to disappear just because a committee has been appointed to examine why the party did poorly at the polls. Peace will only come when one of the factions contending for the soul of the party prevails.

    Although there’s no unanimity as to the best way forward most members agree that PDP has to reinvent itself. But that isn’t going to happen until the party understands where it went wrong. The reactions of some of its leaders – from President Jonathan who’s already dreaming of PDP’s speedy return to power in 2019 to Muazu who’s been bragging about transforming into a vicious attack dog who will give the All Progressives Congress (APC) government nightmares – shows they still don’t get it.

    Their comments and those of their camp followers on the internet show that their understanding of their new opposition role ends with lobbing criticism and invective at every move of the incoming lot and their leader, Buhari. It was that sort of wooly-headed thinking that inspired the hate campaign strategy that backfired spectacularly of March 28 and April 11.

    The tactic or strategy a party in opposition adopts is usually shaped by the circumstance. There is the ‘reaction model’ involving relentless sniping and nitpicking. This means harassing your quarry over every little failing. It could be quite effective where the government in power is already unpopular, but it is very risky where certain lines are crossed.

    The other option is the ‘proactive model’ in which the opposition tries to take the initiative by proffering new and more attractive policies than those set forth by the government of the day for dealing with challenges. This is mostly adopted where the incumbent regime retains a measure of popularity and credibility. In this case frontal attack doesn’t work because there’s not much to attack.

    APC adopted the relentless attack model, now the PDP lazily wants to follow that same tack without understanding why it worked. You don’t attack for attack sake. The power of a critic’s utterances comes from his credibility. When Buhari talks about fighting corruption there’s a ring of believability to his words because of his history. The same comments coming from some of our former heads of state immediately conjures images of very black pots calling the kettle names.

    Jonathan was roundly criticized because there was so much to criticize in his government. The flak hit home because it was supported by concrete evidence. If the opposition were hitting him over the head for corruption, they could point at several running scandals at every point in time. It was so bad that by the final year of his tenure the president had lost so much credibility locally and internationally.

    In trying to savage Buhari even before he’s sworn into office, the PDP is making a big mistake. The man still enjoys tremendous goodwill and this will not dissipate overnight; it will take him stumbling from disaster to disaster for that to happen.

    If anything PDP and its leaders should stay out of the way. As the magnitude of the mess it created becomes evident they should be hiding their heads in shame and allow the new team clean up their mess. And truly Nigeria in 2015 is one massive mess.

    Every day the sheer scale of Boko Haram atrocities becomes evident. On the positive side the military has recorded successes in recent times. But it has struck me that all the efforts of the armies of Nigeria and three neighbouring countries have not been able to wipe out the sect.

    After each day’s fighting the military reports new heavy death tolls of the part of the militants. How did they manage to get this big? How did they manage to build such a mighty force of men under arms? What were the administrations in charge in the last decade doing while this monster grew? All of this occurred under PDP’s watch.

    Under the same party the nation has become bitterly polarized along ethnic and religious lines like never before in her history. The hatred between groups is frighteningly approaching the intensity of the pre-civil war period.

    That’s not all. The economy has been run aground. There is no electricity. Fuel queues have become a permanent feature of our landscape. We squander billions of naira on dubious subsidy payments every year. The tragedy is compounded by the fact that neither the Ministry of Finance nor the oil marketers can agree on what the numbers are.

    Unemployment has assumed the status of a plague. Under pressure from falling oil prices the naira now exchanges at an all-time low of well over N200 to the US dollar. The foreign reserves and Excess Crude Account are depleted. With one or two exceptions most states cannot pay monthly salaries and even the federal government had to borrow to meet its own wage obligations. This is the country that PDP would be handing to the next administration.

    The clean-up exercise that Buhari has been saddled is going to take a while to get to done. We’re not going to wake up on May 30 to discover that Nigeria has become Paradise.

    I believe that the president-elect has started going about his business in a very sound way. Some have tried to make his attempts at lowering expectations out to be an attempt to renege on campaign promises. But nothing could be farther from the truth.

    Anybody who has bothered to read between the lines of his words in the past few weeks would notice he’s been clearly setting the style and tone of his government. In his comments on the first anniversary of the abduction of the Chibok girls he said the approach of his administration to resolving the issue would be founded on honesty. That required him to declare bluntly that there were no guarantees the girls would ever be found.

    One of Jonathan’s greatest undoing is that for much of his tenure he lived in denial and never leveled with the public about how bad things were. He preferred to tell the each audience what he felt they wanted to hear instead of the bitter truth.

    He glossed over the insurgency even when bombs were going off in Abuja – preferring the narrative that it was the work of APC and sundry enemies who were bent on unseating him. He and his wife didn’t initially accept that the Chibok abductions happened. Indeed some of his aides up till today insist that the incident was a politically-motivated stunt to embarrass the government.

    After he accepted that the incident did happen, he kept reassuring the country of their imminent return. At a point one of his defence chiefs even boasted of knowing where they were being held. More than a year after they are still not home. By promising what he could not deliver Jonathan did incalculable harm to his credibility. The result is he led his party to the electoral carnage we’ve just witnessed.

    Seamlessly the party responsible for our sorry state becomes the new opposition. It expects to get going in that role by deploying criticism. But the erstwhile ruling party lost the moral right to criticise by its criminal mismanagement of Nigeria. Indeed, it would be amusing watching PDP leaders moan about the state of the nation in the next one or two years.

    PDP must now earn the right to criticize those who govern the country. Introspection and planning were never its strong suit. But that more than anything is what is required in opposition. In 1999, the party’s first Minister for Power, Bola Ige, excitedly promised to deliver 24-hour electricity within six months. He didn’t wait to understand what the problem was. Sixteen years after his successors haven’t done better.

    The party needs to prove through concrete actions that it has repented of its old, discredited ways and can now be entrusted with power.

    It will not have the federal platform to showcase anything in the coming years. It would have to prove its competence using its few remaining outposts in the South-South, South-East and Gombe. APC did this successfully – that was why during the campaigns it could point to the achievements of its governors in Lagos, Kano, Rivers, Ogun, Oyo and elsewhere as examples of good governance it intended to replicate at federal level.

    Until it has something positive to show PDP and its discredited leaders must really stay out of the way of the cleaners.

  • ‘It’s time for PDP to put its house in order’

    ‘It’s time for PDP to put its house in order’

    Ambassador Karo Ekewenu, a United Nations Ambassador on Millennium Development Goals in this interview with some journalists talks about the last general elections in Nigeria, Delta State politics, President Goodluck Jonathan and the roles of other countries and personalities of note in the democratic journey towards 2015 general elections. Excerpts:

    I want you to reflect on the last 2015 general elections considering the propaganda, hate campaigns and series of predictions before the election?

    I congratulate all Nigerians irrespective of party affiliations on the success of the March 28 Presidential elections in particular. The peaceful outcome of the exercise is a blessing for our beloved country. I give kudos to Professor Attahiru Jega, the Chairman of Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) for his exceptional, brilliant and transparent performance. In Attahiru Jega we found the hope of a new Nigeria. What we are celebrating today would have evaporated into thin air but for the calmness, sense of mission and thoroughness of Jega and his working team. ?

    I equally acknowledge the patriotism and sense of leadership of President Goodluck Jonathan for having the inner mind and eye to appoint Jega who has proven to be the right man for the job, and for allowing him the free hand needed in doing the delicate but important national assignment.

    Jonathan further demonstrated his high level of patriotism and leadership in view of his calm disposition through the course of the electioneering exercise and crowned this when he conceded defeat when it became glaring that his opponent had won the contest. The rare action in this part of the globe was most crucially necessary to douse the fear across the nation at the period. That was probably the most difficult decision ever taken by the President of the Federal Republic but, trust me, that’s the wisest and most profitable as well. It was a display of true leadership statesmanship.

    You are talking as if it was only the efforts of some Nigerians that were responsible for the success of the election?…

    A lot of Nigerians, friends of Nigeria and the international community played great roles in ensuring peace before, during and after the elections. One cannot underestimate the powerful intervention of the United States of America (USA), European Union, United Kingdom, The African Union, ECOWAS, Dr Kofi Annan, Chief Emeka Anyaoku, President John Dramani Mahama of Ghana, His Eminence, The Sultan of Sokoto, Professor Ibrahim Agboola Gambari, Professor Bolaji Akinyemi, GeneraL Abdusalam Abubakar (rtd) and so many others who intervened and worked frantically for peace. The churches/mosques prayed and fasted. The youths of Nigeria on their parts took to the social media to seriously canvass for peaceful general elections. They demonstrated their seriousness about the type of government they want at all levels in Nigeria despite being let down by some of their hustling celebrities and role-models who tried everything to kill the dream. The determination to achieve peace was hugely massive.

    Elections have come and gone, if you were to advise the contestants, what would you tell them?

    ? I congratulate all the candidates who contested for different positions, from presidential to the states Houses of Assembly. It is not always about winning, I know that the participation is always the beginning of a long journey in the wilderness of politics. I further congratulate the winners as I implored the losers not to be disillusioned. A loser who feels genuinely concerned and doubtful about his loss should address the grievance through the recognized channel instead of instigating crisis that will not take the nation anywhere. Losers of today can be winners tomorrow.

    You were in Delta State during the elections, what was the experience like?

    In Delta State, I was surprised at the level of awareness from the urban to the rural areas about the contesting candidates in each of the political parties.

    From Ethiope -West to Ethiope-East down to Okpe, Sapele and the entire Ughelli, everybody knows Senator Ifeanyi Okowa who was then contesting to be governor.

    I was moved to ask one of the old women in one of the villages in Okpe Local Government whom I saw in the PDP shirt on why she was supporting Senator Ifeanyi Okowa.

    The response I got from her in Urhobo language was that “Where we are heading to is greater than where we are coming from. ” She further said that if the Urhobos can fully accommodate strangers and make them part of them then why can’t we as Urhobos give them a chance to share their goodness to the land. And I must confess that this is the mentality of the Urhobo nation. From 1999 when an Urhobo son in person of Chief James Ibori became the governor of Delta State, the state has been flourishing in harmony as a multi ethnic state despite the fact that the Urhobo nation is the largest ethnic state in the state.

    The expectation from Okowa among the people of Delta Central is high and to whom much is given, much is expected.

    What is the way forward for the Peoples Democratic Party in Delta State to consolidate on its political grip in the state?

    What is more interesting to note is that Delta State people are completely of the position that the political class in the state should come to accept the final verdict of the credible governorship election. In the journey of life, there is bound to be a victor and the vanquished, There is bound to be a winner and a loser.

    In principle, the jostling for a political office is to consent to the fact that one person is bound to triumph and the rest aspirants are obligated by the rules of the game to accept defeat. Indeed, this understanding is a golden rule. It is not exclusive to politics.

    Even in the prominent fates that we understand and believe in, magnanimity in victory and gallantry in defeat is what differentiate real sportsmen from dilettantes and desperadoes.

    The time to shun greed and begin to strengthen our institution as a party is now. It’s time to shun ethnic sentiments and be patriotic as party men and women. The strategy of bridge building has worked for the Urhobo nation and it will work for the Peoples Democratic Party. Senator Okowa as a leader has proven by all standards that he is capable of taking the party to its Eldorado and all he needs is the support from all and sundry. If Lagos State can attain its enviable heights today even as an opposition party in government, why won’t Delta State under Senator Okowa make it as an intellectual power of the Niger Delta nation?

    This is the time for PDP to put its house in order and strengthen the party to become a formidable force. That is the spirit of unity needed for political advancement. Enough of disgraceful defection of members here and there. The way forward is for PDP to embrace the principles of justice, equity, unity of purpose and jettison ethnic sentiments so as to recover its lost pride and dignity as the once largest political party in Africa.

  • PDP  vows to hold Buhari’s govt accountable, return to power in 2019

    PDP vows to hold Buhari’s govt accountable, return to power in 2019

    The Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) has promised to present a credible opposition for the country and return to power in 2019.

    The Deputy Senate President, Ike Ekweremadu, who is the Chairman of the Post- Election Review Committee , spoke with State House correspondents after the committee met with President Jonathan at the Presidential Villa.

    He said that the PDP will hold the incoming government accountable for the promises they have made to Nigerians.

    On the purpose of the visit, he said: “As you are aware, the PDP set up a committee to have an overview of our performance during 2015 election and possibly proffer a road map for the PDP to return to its past glory.”

    “This committee has since been inaugurated and we deemed it necessary to come back to the leader of the party to brief him on our appointment and to seek his support and cooperation.”

    “I would like to announce that Mr President has given us his words that he will encourage and will support this process and that he is interested in the party returning to its past glory and that he is going to do everything to ensure that we remain intact and we also agreed that all bickering have to stop so that we have a position that will enable us to rebuild our party.”

    Speaking on the PDP not been able to manage its past successes, he said: “When you have this kind of situation, the first reaction will be blame game. But I think we have been able to absorb that shock and right now I can assure you that all that bickering has stopped.”

    “We are now ready to rebuild our party and be able to present in a credible opposition for this country that will ensure us return to power in 2019.”

    “We are ready to hold the new government accountable and make sure that the promises they have made that we will be able to benchmark each of them appropriately so that it will not be that they have deceived Nigerians and got their votes.”

    “They are going to account for their statements, their promises. We will hold them accountable to all the promises.” He stated

  • Mu’azu fires back at Fayose

    Mu’azu fires back at Fayose

    Says, Governor’s allegations baseless, unfounded

    The National chairman of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Adamu Mu’azu, on Thursday took a swipe on Ekiti State Governor, Ayodele Fayose, for alleging that he betrayed the party during the March 28 presidential poll.

    Fayose while calling for the sack of all PDP leaders who failed to deliver their territories for President Goodluck Jonathan in the last election, had claimed that he had evidence Mu’azu worked for the All Progressives Congress (APC).

    Embittered by the Governor’s outburst, the Chairman who recalled Fayose’s pre-election claim that he had evidence Gen. Muhammadu Buhari, was dying, said hopes Fayose wasn’t telling another lie.

    In the messages posted on his twitter handle, @muazuaa, the PDP chairman challenged Fayose to provide the evidence that he (Mu’azu) worked against his party.

    The PDP chief described Fayose’s claim as baseless and unfounded, noting that he did his best for President Jonathan.

    According to him, those clamouring for change in the PDP National Working Committee (NWC) were the same people who contributed to the party’s defeat through their insincerity and praise-singing.

    He said: ” Fayose: I have evidence that Mu’azu worked for APC. We hope it’s not the kind of evidence he once said he had that Buhari was dying?

    “We challenge Governor Fayose to come out with the evidence that shows that the National Chairman worked for APC during the elections.

    “On Governor Fayose’s allegations, they are baseless and unfounded. We will continue to support him and the good people of Ekiti State.

    “We must provide a responsible and credible opposition to the incoming government. Together Nigeria will be great.

    “I am willing to work with all members and organs of our great party to begin a new journey of trust and sincerity with the Nigerian people.

    “In our desire to correct all wrongs and negative impressions about our party, I am calling on Nigerians to partner with us.

    “But things will change now. Power truly belongs to the people and we are giving it back to them.”

    Debunking speculations that he may dump the PDP for the APC, Muazu said the incoming ruling party has nothing to offer him, adding “I am too principled to betray my party. I have been here since 1999.”

    He explained that the PDP lost in the north because the perception about President Jonathan and the PDP had been at all time low.

     

  • Internal wrangling caused by post election trauma – PDP

    Internal wrangling caused by post election trauma – PDP

    The Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) has said that post election trauma arising from defeat in the last general election was responsible for the ongoing internal bickering among leaders and key stakeholders in the party.

    A statement issued on Wednesday by the National Publicity Secretary of the PDP, Chief Olisa Metuh, however said the party has overcome the trauma, with the mature and timely intervention of President Goodluck Jonathan.

    President Jonathan had, on Tuesday, handed down a directive, ordering all combative parties to sheathe their swords to save the future of the party.

    Metuh said: “The National Working Committee will absolutely abide by the counsel and has instructed all the executives of the party at all levels to comply accordingly.

    “The leadership of the PDP regrets any embarrassment the avoidable skirmishes may have caused the members of our great party, especially our founding fathers and teeming supporters across the country.

    “We are aware that this unfortunate development is a consequence of post election trauma arising from our first ever defeat. We however note with relief that we have now overcome this challenge.

    “The National Working Committee assures that in the new spirit of harmony in the PDP family, the reengineering process which began on Tuesday with the inauguration of the Post Election Review Committee will be vigorously sustained to restore the lost glory of our great party.

    “We therefore urge all our members to ensure that they henceforth guard their utterances and actions no matter the provocation and distortions in some section of the media while channeling their energies and ideas towards the rebuilding process.

    “In this regard, all members who have reports, grievances and suggestions on the way forward should transmit same to the Post-Election Review Committee for an all inclusive roadmap in the overall effort to regain power in 2019.”

    Metuh urged members to be wary of the activities of some “mischievous persons” within and outside the PDP family who are bent on frustrating the party’s peace efforts.