Tag: PDP

  • ‘PDP will lose Taraba, if Umar gets ticket’

    ‘PDP will lose Taraba, if Umar gets ticket’

    Former Secretary to the State Government (SSG) of Taraba, Ambassador Emmanuel Njiwah, in this interview, warns the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) of ceding the governorship ticket to Acting Governor Garba Umar, as that will make the ruling party lose to the opposition in Taraba. He also speaks on why he and other commissioners were sacked by Umar. Senior Correspondent FANEN IHYONGO was there. Excerpt:

    The Acting Governor of Taraba State, Garba Umar, in a recent interview with Thisday, accused you and other former commissioners of “tampering” with N400 million flood mitigating grant, which is why he booted you out of office. May we hear from you why you were sacked?

    You have asked me as a person but I will speak on behalf of the team that was sacked by the deputy governor. First and foremost, Garba Umar became the deputy governor by appointment; he did not contest the election with Governor Danbaba Suntai. He only came onboard when our former Deputy Governor, Sani Abubakar Danladi was impeached by the State House of Assembly. Umar had spent barely three weeks when Suntai had a plane crash with his security aides. The deputy governor had not known anything about governance. All along he had been in the private sector, but he had to take over the mantle of leadership as acting governor, following the governor’s mishap. But before the crash, Suntai had set up committees in charge of disbursing the flood funds for the purchase of relief materials for those who were affected by the flood disaster in the state in 2012. The main committee was chaired by the deputy governor, with some of us as members, including the Chief of Staff, the then Head of Service and commissioners of Justice, Environment, Finance, Health and Information. Most of the job was done before the governor had the crash. There were two main committees in charge of purchases. The materials bought were determined by the main committee, through the logistics committee which was to do market survey and identify the quantity, quality and price of each of the items to be purchased. No member of the main committee was involved in purchases, except the wife of the Chief of Staff –now SSG, who got the contract to purchase the items. So, I don’t know the money Umar keeps saying we tampered with. The reports of the two committees are there. There is no missing fund in the report. There is nobody who said he was not giving some money meant to purchase an item. I don’t know how I, as the SSG who was in the main committee tampered with the funds. Even the commissioners who were involved in the purchases returned the sum of more than nine million naira as discount gotten from the purchases. When the report was submitted, it was supposed to be scrutinised by the executive. But meanwhile, the deputy governor who was now in acting capacity was finding a way to do away with some of us. He was trying without success to lobby through some of us to take over as substantive governor. He wanted me, particularly, to prepare a memo stating that Suntai was incapacitated so his deputy should assume his office. He promised to make me the deputy governor, with the sum of N100 million, lobbied through a permanent secretary and two other commissioners, which I will only mention their names if he (Umar) denies this. This was what happened. So, he decided to attach the commissioners who were very loyal to Suntai and I who refused to write the memo, to the flood funds so as to remove us from office. No one tampered with the flood funds. It was what he planned and executed. The report is there and was even published in one of the newspapers in the state for the public to see. So, I don’t know how he got us indicted. The truth is that nobody tampered with the flood disaster money. Few minutes before he sacked us, Umar asked his Muslim brother –the former commissioner of health to resign his appointment. The former commissioner of Information was not sacked, but he voluntarily left government when Umar became disloyal to the governor. The truth is that Governor Suntai had warned that nobody should take even transport fare from the funds which we all complied. So, the deputy governor should explain his source, how we tampered with the flood funds.

    What did you do when you were sacked?

    We went to court within the first three days, because we knew we were wrongly sacked. We went to court since July last year. The judgment was to be passed on May 11 this year but the court is yet to rule on the case. I wish to say somebody somewhere is tampering with justice in the state, but I don’t want to talk about the matter since it is already in the court of law. The deputy governor said he booted us from office because, according to him, we are corrupt. We said we are innocent. We went to court, but the deputy governor is preempting judgment by still saying we are corrupt. I don’t know where he got his own judgment or whether he has taken over the duties of the court.

    How much did the committees spend in total?

    N100 million was set aside to rehabilitate the infrastructure that was affected by the flood. This included infrastructure from schools, dispensaries, mosques, churches and culverts. So, apart from some bank charges, about two hundred and something million naira was disbursed.

    What happened to the N100 million, at the time you were sacked?

    It was intact in the state’s treasury. All the funds disbursed were from the treasury and the commissioner of Finance submitted a letter informing us that the N100 million was still intact.

    Umar has always said his relationship with his boss is still very cordial. That he is taking care of the governor and his family. Do you have a different view?

    There is no better word to describe the kind of relationship he presently has with the governor. They are not cordial in any way. Immediately the governor had the plane crash, Umar started plotting on how he could take over. Anybody who is cordial with his boss would not do that. He also moved to remove all the appointees of the governor in order to clear the way for him to become the substantive governor. Is that cordiality? He said he is taking care of the governor. It is not true. Suntai is the executive governor of the state and he is entitled to be taken care of by the government and not by Garba Umar. Umar does not have the resources to take care of Suntai. Before his appointment as deputy governor, Umar had not up to N20 thousand in all his accounts. All we knew about him was that he was a trader, selling nuvan (mosquito insecticides) in Gombe state. So, Umar does not have the capacity to take care of Suntai in any regard. It is the government that is supposed to take care of the governor but the government being run by Umar is not doing that.

    In the same interview, Umar claimed Taraba people are having the best governance now. Don’t you think he has done beyond criticising him, primarily in the area of infrastructural development?

    If there is any time in the life of Taraba state that there was the worst administration, Umar’s time is worse than that worst. Somehow, I have been in the government of Taraba state in different phases, since its creation. I was a director in the ministry, commissioner, board chairman and SSG. So, I know that no government –both military and civilian, has been as bad as the one steered by Umar. He has not developed anything in the state. All the projects started by Suntai have stopped. The state university which Suntai established for the education of our children is not being funded. When I was there, I had to persuade him to fund the university but he would not. The other time the university wanted to embark on strike action, but for the intervention of a third fund and other federal government agencies in the tertiary institutions, the state university would have been closed down. It is terribly not being funded by the deputy governor who has declared himself as acting governor. Taraba state is in its worst period. Under Suntai, even when all the north-eastern states had some crises, Taraba never experienced any. The governor was proactive and knew how timely to arrest such crisis and to crackdown on suspected insurgents. But this man is rather aiding the insurgents by purchasing arms for them. And I am not the one saying it, but the people who know it are reliably saying it and are ready to testify. This is because, as governor in acting capacity, he is the chief security officer of the state. And as chief security officer, he should be able to know where the roof is leaking so as to mend it but he is not doing that. He seems to be taking side. And the reason is simply because he is hell-bent to take over Taraba so he cannot hesitate to do anything that can pave the way for him to succeed.

    He said he has done well, so if the people ask him to contest the governorship –as a clarion call, he will.

    I don’t know that kind of clarion call. Honestly, the greatest mistake Suntai has made in his life was picking Umar as his deputy. There can be no mistake worse than this. Suntai had relied solely on elders to pick someone for him from the northern zone. The governor did not know this man. If he had known how bad he is, he wouldn’t have picked him. I don’t want to speak on his intelligence, otherwise, I worked with him and I know he doesn’t have the moral and intellectual capacity to be governor of the state. For example, the College of Agriculture Governing Board had paid him a courtesy call. The members advanced some demands, which I was there –as the SSG. He told them yes I would do these things; no I would not do those ones. At the end, I summed up the things he said he was going to do and those he turned down. I prepared a memo in that regard for his consideration and approval. But upon giving him the memo, he asked me what is this SSG? I told him these are the things you approved for the college. He said no I didn’t mean what I said; it was only a political talk. I asked what do you mean your Excellency?  I told him he is acting governor, so whatever he promises the people or public institutions he has to fulfill it –that’s how the government works. Then I asked him why he gave them fake promise. So, I know, though not very sure, that was one of the reasons he got angry with me. And I doubt if he has granted those requests.

    Was there any agreement between Umar and Suntai that Umar would not run for office? If there is, was the agreement written or oral?

    On several occasions, Governor Suntai emphasised to him (Umar) that I have brought you to complete my tenure with me. Under no account should you nurse any form of ambition to contest, because the northern and central zones have produced governor. So, in 2015, we shall relinquish power to the southern zone, and the reason why I have appointed you my deputy is because of your age –so that you would not have any ambition to take over, so please abide by this and if at the end of our tenure you don’t see me advancing you, don’t be annoyed because we must give the governorship slot to where it belongs, for justice and equity. Umar said no no no, I am very ok sir; I am not going to contest. But now he has forgotten that the governor picked him from an inconsequential corner.

    Do you think he is bond by that agreement, considering the fact that it is not constitutional? 

    Constitutionally, he is not bond by it. Morally, he is. That is why I said he lacks the moral right to contest. Umar has no moral competence. Recall his promise with the College of Agriculture which he reneged on.

    Do you mean, apart from Umar who is kicking against power shift, stakeholders from the north and central zones are in support of power shift to southern zone?

    You know, before now, when former Governor Jolly Nyame was leaving office, people from all the zones contested to succeed him including those from the northern zone where he comes from. This was because nothing had come up clearly on how power should shift in the state. But after Suntai succeeded Nyame from the central zone, morally, those of us who have been resident in the state, who grew up in Taraba and served in the state, feel the fairest thing to do is to support the southern zone to produce the next governor. Unfortunately, Umar does not share this opinion, because he is a Taraba indigene by extension. He was not born in Taraba; he didn’t grow up in the state; he didn’t school in Taraba and he didn’t reside in the state for a week. He wasn’t known in Taraba state so he does not know the politics of Taraba. In Taraba, we always ensure we have a united front –the north, central and south. Once we get a candidate, we do it together. And so, since the north and central have had it, power has to shift to the south in 2015. What moral right does Umar have that he wants to contest from the northern zone? After 18 years of rule by the north and central zones, he still doesn’t want the southern zone to have it, why? Democratic governance, both at the level of presidency down to governorship and other positions, has to be rotational.

    He (Umar) said if the people ask him to run, he will, irrespective of the zoning arrangement which his people have argued that it is not constitutional.

    Who are the people that will ask him to run? A street beggar has other street beggars that can ask him to do something. We had a man (now late) in my area who was mentally derailed. He said he was contesting the presidency of this country, and anywhere he went the people addressed him as president. Was he the president? Is it such kind of people that will ask him to run? Umar does not have the moral and intellectual capacity to be governor. So, who will ask him to run? Suntai had put to end the system of thuggery in the state but Umar has reintroduced it. Recently he was in Takum to attend the birthday anniversary of the state Minister for Niger Delta Affairs, Arc. Darius Dickson Ishaku, and he went with thugs. So, is it his thugs that are asking him to contest?

    Is there religious division in Taraba?

    The deputy governor has brought a terrible polarisation in the religious front, not only between Christians and Muslims, but even within the Muslim community. He has deeply divided them. He is telling people to support his ambition because he is a Muslim. This is wrong; being a Christian or Muslim is not the yardstick for becoming the president or governor, but what you have to do for the people and country. For Umar, he is simply not qualified, whether he is a Muslim or Christian.

    How would you assess the state’s economic status now, because the acting governor says he has saved some money and is paying monthly salaries before receiving the federal allocation?

    Never in the history of Taraba state that the treasury has been looted by government officials as it is the case today. You will be surprised to note that it is under Umar that salaries of a previous month are paid in the week of the following month. The reason is that he has taken so much bank overdrafts that any money that comes in from the federation account will try to reduce what he has taken, then he would have another overdraft to pay the salaries of the previous month. Is that saving money? Is that paying salaries without the federal subvention? He does not pay salaries as at when due, until the following month. Pensioners used to collect their pension around 25th of every month. Today, we don’t get our pension until a new month comes. The treasury is terribly battered and he is trying to restructure it so that he can siphon more money. If you are in Jalingo, just interview anybody on the street, or the lowest profile civil servant, or a cleaner and they will tell you that this is the first time they are experiencing this kind of situation –where salaries of a previous month are paid in the following month.

    Do you know what he does with the money?

    Since he is not developing Taraba state with the money, since all the roads in the state are not being developed, since the university and other institutions of learning are not being funded, since he is only making political talks, and since the money is not there, we know where the money is going: he has an unsearchable ambition. He is so desperate to forcefully take over as substantive governor of Taraba state and to contest the governorship election. The money is now residing in the corridors of those who buy his idea and keep telling him we shall make you governor. I tell you, just dress in elegant clothes and go to Jalingo. When you see the deputy governor, tell him you have finalised every preparation to remove Danbaba Suntai for him to take over as substantive governor. Begin to quote some names, I bet you will come back with millions of naira. So, the state’s resources have become business funds for Garba Umar to waste on his unsearchable ambition of taking over.

    Some people still find it difficult to believe when people like you accused Umar of disloyalty. Because he always says he is still 100 percent loyal to Suntai and always referred to the governor as his boss. And again, he has not packed into the Government House and the portraits of Suntai still adorn his walls. So, what is this disloyalty that Suntai people keep talking about?

    I don’t really know the best adjective to describe the degree of Umar’s disloyalty to Suntai. First and foremost, when his boss was flown abroad for treatment, he vacated the official quarters assigned to him by his boss. He moved to the Presidential Lodge on his own –without the permission of his boss. Two, Suntai has not put barricades where he stays, but Umar has erected barricades to block both sides of the road where he stays. The street where he stays is not passable now. Residents of the area are finding it difficult as they are not allowed to pass there. Three, Umar dislodged all the political structures of his boss, starting with the leadership of the House of Assembly to pave the way for him to become the substantive governor. Four, he removed the SSG and commissioners who refused, at his request, to raise a memo to the House of Assembly for the lawmakers to confirm him as substantive governor. Five, he has made several attempts, using money, to dislodge the party executives. He sent his allies to go round and collect signatures to dislodge the party structure that was put in place by his principal. Today he is working with Advisers that were not appointed by the governor. The SSG and commissioners working with him today are not Suntai’s appointees. I heard him said he appointed from Suntai’s family. He should name just one person in his cabinet that is from Suntai’s family. Which of the commissioners he has appointed visits Suntai when the governor is in Government House Jalingo? We go there daily to see and discuss with the governor but we don’t see any of them. He has used the state’s funds to buy the House of Assembly members who ceded the running of the state to him. Is that loyalty? Today, the Assembly is split into two factions, some for him and some for his principal. Is that loyalty? Has he forgotten so quickly how he came onboard? Did he contest any election? Or was he part of the team that accompanied Suntai round the state to campaign for the reelection of the governor in 2011? We don’t even know the party he is working for, because he seems not to be working for the growth of the PDP in Taraba state. So, where is the loyalty he has for Suntai? A man who had travelled abroad to see his boss on the sickbed, upon his return, he asked me to prepare a memo so that he could take over as governor of the state while I would be the deputy. Is that loyalty?

    Do you think the plethora of crises affecting Taraba will affect the 2015 elections in the state?

    Yes. Yes. The first to affect the election is the insecurity he has created in the state. He has dislodged Christian villages in Wukari, Gassol, Donga, Ibi and Bali. He tried to dislodge the Wukari town but it wasn’t possible. He has done all these things in a scheme to reduce the Christian population so as to enable him take over the state. It is very unfortunate. Taraba people will not vote on religious sentiments. We shall vote on the basis of competence and the will to serve and deliver democratic dividends. Don’t forget that the state is going to experience hunger by next year. After dislodging the Christian farmers, their farm crops were uprooted. Majority of those displaced are Tiv people. The Jukuns were not displaced much because they live in compact settlements unlike the Tiv farmers who dwell in isolated sparse settlements. No fewer than 700 persons have lost their lives in Taraba, many more were injured and hundreds of thousands displaced within the time that Umar has been in charge. He tried the official way without success and now he is trying to dislodge, maim and suppress the people, but I know he would not succeed. About five local government areas of Taraba state have not received their voter cards because of the insecurity. That tells you that the election is already affected by the crisis. We are aware of how hired insurgents came into the state, and we want the federal government to do something about it. There is no way insurgents could invade a state and the security council/agencies would not know. We are aware that all the local government areas in the state are being besieged by insurgents who are ready to strike. Will the chief security officer of the state and his government claim they are not aware of this development? He should fish out the culprits to prove his innocence, for Taraba to vote next year. But I want to assure you that the campaign for a credible candidate in Taraba state is going to be the easiest because people now know the man who is acting, such that if you give Umar the PDP ticket, the ruling party will lose Taraba. This is because his coming has been a disaster and nobody is willing to have him as governor for four years. It is not possible. The easiest way for PDP to lose Taraba state is to give its governorship ticket to Umar.

     

  • That PDP offer of first refusal to Jonathan

    That PDP offer of first refusal to Jonathan

    SIR: As a prelude to the 2015 general elections, the Peoples Democratic Party, PDP, offered what they call an offer of first refusal to President Goodluck Jonathan to fly the party’s flag in the forthcoming Presidential election. This means that the party has endorsed President Jonathan as its candidate and other aspirants will only contest the primaries and vie for the ticket if he rejects the offer.

    For the past two years or so it would have been clear to any keen observer of Nigerian politics that President Goodluck Jonathan has not had any serious challenger to the office. Aside from that fact, when has any executive incumbent in Nigeria either at the federal or state level lost a re-election bid at the primaries?

    In 1983 the National Party of Nigeria, NPN did not make Shehu Shagari an offer of first refusal yet he was re-elected to the Presidency.  In 2003 despite the near-miss that President Obasanjo suffered in the hands of his deputy and power broker Atiku Abubakar, he was still not offered a right of first refusal to the Presidency.

    That this lexicon is gradually creeping into our political dictionary even when it has existed with us in an unorthodox manner as the “power of incumbency” shows that something is wrong and spin doctors are making a hell of an effort to justify it.

    They are so quick to point out that it also exits in United States of America from where we copied our presidential system of government but that is where the comparison ends. Those that make the unnecessary comparison however forget to tell Nigerians that the offer in the US is always tied to landmark achievements and performance.  Thomas Jefferson who was the first American President to be made that offer in 1805 was because of the landmark achievement of acquiring the massive Louisiana territory in 1803 from France thereby almost doubling American land mass as it was then. Several other American Presidents have been made that offer on the strength of their solid achievements and performance in office.

    To what then does President Jonathan merit this offer? Is it because Nigerian undergraduates stayed at home for more than six months because his government reneged on the agreement it made with university teachers some years ago? Is it because public hospitals were shut in Nigeria for more than two months  on account of a strike action by medical doctors as a result of an unfulfilled agreement on the part of the government?

    Is PDP making President Jonathan the offer on the grounds that Nigeria is the biggest economy in Africa where there is no stable power supply or where hunger is rising even as the economy is growing?

    The offer of first refusal did not even just come ordinary. It came with a baggage full of dirt and insult to the sensibilities of Nigerians. As part of the offer, all the first term PDP governors are to be returned unopposed whether the governor performed well or not; all serving PDP governors who aspire to go to Senate will be returned unopposed; the Senate President David Mark will have a jolly ride back to the Senate and all sorts of compromises at the expense of the ordinary Nigerian whose future is tied to an elite that conspires and consolidates for its own selfish interests.

    Why are we so blessed in copying the wrong things and leaving out the good ones?

    The efforts dissipated by the party and presidential image makers should better be channeled to more creative endeavours instead of trying to hoodwink Nigerians. Nigerians know better and will have their day in the polling booths come next year. It is for the party to make an offer of first refusal to anybody but the person will have to contend with Nigerians come February next year.

     

    • Chukwuma Okoro,

    Abule Oshun, Lagos

  • We must not whitewash leadership failure, says Tinubu

    We must not whitewash leadership failure, says Tinubu

    All Progressives Congress (APC) National Leader Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu has said Nigerians should not celebrate 54 years of independence because the country has not “flourished as it should”.

    He said rather than merriment, it is a time to reflect on what could have been.

    In an independence anniversary statement by his media office, Tinubu said it would be dangerous to “whitewash” the challenges.

    “We are burdened by too many resolvable challenges that remain unresolved. This is not a time for fake cheers and elation at the present state of things just because the calendar has touched this day.

    “We need to use this hour soberly by taking stock of the obstacles mounting before us and of the hard direction in which we seem to be heading.

    “I fear this direction, if further taken, will lead us not home but to an appointment with failure and national destitution,” he said.

    According to Tinubu, the country ought to advance, year by year, toward greater democracy instead of rushing “into the pit of arbitrary, imperious rule that smacks of despotism.”

    “If we whitewash the reality of our existence by lying that all is well just because this is Independence Day, then we ignore the troubling signals at our collective peril,” he said.

    Tinubu said the 16 years of Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) rule have been a period of diminishing return, adding that the longer the party remains in power, the less benefit the people derive.

    “Nigeria now needs a ‘common sense revolution’, a revolution that calls forth a return to decency, probity, transparency of process and fairness in outcome.

    “This is done not by subterfuge, divide and rule and turning Nigeria into a field of discord or a street of broken institutions. It is accomplished by honouring the principles of democratic good governance and economic justice.

    “It is done by persuading the people they are better off as one instead of better off tearing at each other’s throats,” he said.

    Blaming the country’s woes on leadership, Tinubu said for the most of the 54 years and for all of the past 15, honest men have been given scant opportunity to lead Nigeria.

    He said President Goodluck Jonathan’s administration only has a “vision” for personal enrichment.

    “The vaunted Transformation Agenda is but an elaborate name for old-fashion pocket stuffing. They do not have a national blueprint or vision.

    “They do have a blueprint and vision for excessive self enrichment. Their equation is simple. You work, they feast. You toil, they grow fat. You seek a decent wage; they pilfer the collective treasury to enjoy a king’s ransom,” the APC National Leader said.

    Nigeria, Tinubu believes, is saddled with a “reprobate leadership”, while decrying what he called incessant attempts to stigmatise and physically intimidate a peaceful political opposition.

    He bemoaned the militarisation of elections, which he said are features of “a perverse democracy run at gun-point”, coupled with “brazen assaults on the judiciary.”

    “Fifty-four years is enough to have built upon a solid foundation. If we had embraced a few lessons from India and other countries in similar situations like ours, we would be far advanced from where we are,” Tinubu said.

    According to him, there is, however, a ray of hope considering the difference being made in Lagos and other progressive states.

    He said those states kept faith with the nation’s founding fathers’ best practices and policies. Asiwaju Tinubu urged Nigerians to work for a progressive change.

    He added: “Governance is about trust. And this government is not even trusted by itself. This is why it does nothing except feed itself. This is not the road for a better Nigeria.

    “We must proceed from this 54th anniversary to embark on a common sense revolution that brings about a progressive change for the benefit of most of our country men and women, our youth and the vulnerable among us.

    “I speak here of a Common Sense revolution that promotes the well-being and improves the lot of the average person, regardless of his or her ethnic, religious or regional affiliation.

    “In this way, Nigeria will not only be unified in national purpose, it will also have recovered its better path. That will be an Independence Day we can and should celebrate. Until then, we strive to keep from falling further.

    “We dare not remain lost forever. I am positive that help is on the way. Nigerians should be prepared for a change. We must rescue Nigeria from those set to cause it irreparable harm.

    “The change I talk about is the only route to our deliverance from 16 years of the PDP locusts. Nigeria is ours to keep and its democracy is ours to save.”

  • Mixed reactions trail Ugwuanyi’s endorsement

    Mixed reactions have continued to trail the endorsement of Ifeanyi Ugwuanyi as the Enugu State consensus candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) in next year’s election.

    Ugwuanyi was handed the consensus ticket last weekend by the PDP caucus in Enugu North, where the ticket was zone to.

    While his supporters have hailed the endorsement, those in the camp of the Chairman of the Senate Committee on works, Ayogu Eze, have given it thumbs down.

    Eze faulted the process that led to Ugwuanyi’s endorsement, insisting that he was still in the 2015 governorship race.

    But a member of the PDP’s Board of Trustees (BoT) from the zone, who participated in the caucus meeting, Mrs. Justina Eze, described the senator’s comments as unfortunate.

    She said it was a strange act that should not be encouraged in the interest of the people.

    Mrs Eze said the people had been yearning for a sense of belonging in the affairs of the state.

    According to her, the process that led to the emergence of Ugwuanyi was democratic and in conformity with the PDP constitution 2012, as amended.

    Mrs Eze noted that such a distraction, if not controlled, could endanger the chances of the zone from producing the next governor.

    She urged Senator Eze to take the party’s decision in good faith and cooperate with Ugwuanyi at the party primary and governorship elections.

    Dr. Godsmark Eddy Ugwu, one of the aspirants who stepped down for Ugwuanyi, described Senator Eze’s comments as unwarranted.

    The former aspirant said the senator had benefited heavily from the party through the same process he was antagonising.

    He said the Enugu PDP, which twice gave Eze the Senate ticket, had been magnanimous to him.

    Ugwu noted that Senator Eze should show appreciation rather than anger about the party’s decisions and abide by them.

    The politician criticised Senator Eze for describing the caucus meeting as “a gathering of people of my senatorial district”.

  • 1,000 PDP members join Edo APC

    One thousand members of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) have joined the All Progressives Congress (APC) in Urhonigbe North ward of Orhionmwon Local Government Area of Edo State.

    They were received by Deputy Governor Pius Odubu, who assured them of equal treatment with other APC members.

    The deputy governor, who visited the Okaeubo of Urhonigbe, Igie Aimuyo, said the former PDP members would not regret their decision.

    Odubu advised party members to keep their temporary voter cards in preparation for permanent voter cards.

    The defectors’ spokesman, Friday Osazee, said their decision followed the unprecedented performance by the Adams Oshiomhole-led administration.

  • Zoning tears Bayelsa PDP apart

    Zoning tears Bayelsa PDP apart

    There is tension in the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) in Bayelsa State over attempts by stakeholders to zone electoral offices.

    It was gathered that some party members, including some elders, had hatched a plot to stop some National Assembly members from returning in 2015.

    The development, it was gathered, has unsettled the Bayelsa West Senatorial District, where some party leaders were making efforts to deny Senator Heineken Lokpobiri a third term.

    The leaders were also said to be determined to stop the reelection of the member representing Sagbama/ Ekeremor Federal Constituency, Dr. Stella Dorgu.

    Dorgu, whose constituency is in Bayelsa West, replaced Governor Seriake Dickson after his election in 2012.

    Warning signs were said to have emerged in Sagbama at a rally organised at the weekend by party stakeholders from the district to endorse President Goodluck Jonathan for 2015 and Governor Seriake Dickson for 2016.

    Supporters of Lokpobiri and Dorgu, especially youths, were said to have walked out of the rally to register their displeasure over zoning remarks by some of the party leaders.

    The state pioneer chairman, Charles Dorgu, was said to have dropped the shocker during his remarks at the rally.

    He said the political leaders decided to zone the National Assembly seats in the interest of peace and harmony.

    Following the new arrangement, Dorgu said it was Sagbama’s turn to produce a senator for two terms and Ekeremor to produce the House of Representatives’ member for two terms.

    Lokpobiri hails from Ekeremor Local Government Area; Dorgu is from Sagbama, the governor’s local government.

    It was gathered that the remarks by the ex-PDP chairman provoked mixed reactions as the lawmakers’ supporters opposed the decision.

    One of the party leaders, who attended the rally, said it was unfortunate that some persons had hatched a plot to cause confusion in Dickson’s senatorial district.

    The source, who pleaded for anonymity, said Lokpobiri and Dorgu were part of the financiers of the rally because of their support for Jonathan and Dickson.

    He said it was unacceptable for some persons to be flying the zoning kite when the party’s decision-making organs are yet to support it.

    “The PDP constitution is clear and there are party organs that can take a decision on zoning. Decisions on zoning cannot be taken at a rally.”

  • 2015: Power shift agitations divide Delta PDP

    2015: Power shift agitations divide Delta PDP

    There is division in the Delta State Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) over the agitation for power shift to the North Senatorial District. An ethnic group, Urhobo, is spearheading the clamour for zoning. But, other ethnic groups are agitating for primaries for governorship aspirants from the three districts. Correspondent POLYCARP OROSEVWOTU writes on the clash of interests. 

    The agitation for power shift to the Delta North Senatorial District started in 2011, shortly after Governor Emmanuel Uduaghan begun his second term in office. In the last three and half years, politicians from the zone have intensified the campaign for zone, based on the principles of equity, fairness and justice.

    However, other zones have been indifferent to the agitations. Stakeholders from Central and South districts are of the view that the North is a permanent beneficiary of the creation of the state because it hosts the state capital. Besides, they point out that many Deltas from the North had benefitted from major appointments at state and federal levels.

    The three districts are mounting pressures on the governor, but for different reasons. Urhobos from the North have urged him to support the agitation for power shift. But, the other zones are insisting on an-all inclusive approach, saying that aspirants from the three zones should compete for the slot at the primaries. Uduaghan is said to be reflecting and brainstorming on these antagonistic demands by the different ethnic groups.

    Few months ago, there were speculations that the governor was projecting some aspirants as his likely successor. But, a source said, they were dropped, following objections by some influential leaders. Aspirants from the zone include former Secretary to Government Chief Ovie Omo-Agege, Senator Ifeanyi Okowa, Victor Ochei and Chief Tony Obuh.

    Following his declaration of interest, eyes have been on Obuh, the retired Permanent Secretary. His campaign train has rolled into the three districts.  Prominent associates of the governor, including the Speaker of House of Assembly, Chief Ovuozorie Macaulay, Chief Ayiri Emami, the Majority Leader, Hon. Monday Igbuya, Majority leader, and Jaro Egbo, have been selling him to party chieftains.

    Recently, the Ijaw national Leader, Senator Edwin Kiagbodo Clark, also sent a strong message to the governor. He Uduaghan cannot single handedly shape the succession process. When he hosted some aspirants in Kiagbodo, Burutu local government area, he said the next governor will be the product of all stakeholders.

    However, events since then have taken a new dimension. At Uvwie, the home of the PDP chieftain, Hon. Henry Baro, Chief Imami disclosed that the Obuh is the choice of the governor. The legislator from Sapele Constituency, Hon. Monday Igbuya, and many chieftains were present there.

    Many PDP leaders were taken aback by the disclosure, which has not been confirmed or denied by the governor. To them, Uduaghan has started to project a puppet or a stooge as his successor, without consultations with the leaders of diverse ethnic nationalities. They also frowned at the attempt to establish the Ibori/Uduaghan dynasty, warning that the implication is that only few leaders would be foisting their agenda on the state.

    Sources said that the governor may have settled for Obuh, following a sober reflection. “He is interested in continuity of his people-oriented programmes and policies. He believes in the competence of Obuh. But, it cannot be said that he has totally made up his mind. I don’t think he can anoint a successor without carrying the leaders along,” he added.

    Since the Third Republic, elections in Delta State have been a fierce battle. Before Chief Felix Ibru, Chief James Ibori and Uduaghan could breast the tape, there were titanic struggles. Also, the slot had always been competed for by the three zones, with the ruling parties providing a level playing field for aspirants.

    In the Third Republic, under the proscribed Social Democratic Party (SDP), Ibru from the Central and Chief Austin Egbo from the North contested at the primaries. There was no agitation for zoning. Also, Ibori contested in 1999, Chief Obielu from the North and Dr Mike Chigue from Delta South equally contested with him. In 2011, Uduaghan from the  South, Okowa from the North, Omo-Agege of the Central and others contested with him.

    According to politicians from the South and Central, zoning has never shaped the selection process in the PDP, adding that it has always been a battle for the survival of the fittest. But,the Urhobo Progress Union (UPU) disagreed with stakeholders from the two zones.

    Politicians from the North and Central have maintained that the North, particularly Anioma, is not marginalised. Apart from hosting the state capital, the North has produced big wigs who are beneficiary of major appointments. They include Ambassador Joy Ogwu, the Nigeria Ambassador to the United Nations, Prof. Sylvester Monye, the Special Adviser to Mr. President on Performance, Monitoring and Evaluation, Mrs. Ngozi Olejeme, the National Social Insurance Trust Fund Chairman, and Mr. Peter Idabor, the Director-General of the National Oil Spill, Detection and Response Agency.

    Others are Prof. Epiphany Azinge, Director-General of the Institute of Advanced Legal Studies, Dr. Cairo Ojuogbo, Chairman, Export and Processing Zone, Calabar, Dr. Eugine Juwah, Executive Vice Chairman/CEO Nigeria Communication Commission, Dr. (Mrs.) Esther Uduahi, Chairman of the Board of National Commission for Mass Literacy, Adult and Non-Formal Education, Engr. Gabriel Amuchi, Managing Director of the Federal Roads Maintainers Agency (FERMA), Mrs. Mariam Ali, Special Assistant to the President on Inter-Government Relation, Mr. Godwin Emefiele, Governor of Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) and Dr. (Mrs.)  Ngozi Okonjo Iwela, the Minister of Finance and Co-ordinating Minister of the Economy.

    However, UPU said argued that the North deserved the slot as compensation for its bloc vote for President Goodluck Jonathan. In 2011, the president garnered over 800,000 votes from the area.

    Besides, the group pointed out that the Urhobo from the North have not produced the governor since 1999. Ibori is from the Central and Uduaghan is from the South.

    According to observers, if the North succeeds in its agitation for power shift, it may not be able to prevent the imposition of the candidate for next year’s election. The endorsement of Obuh may not go down well with other aspirants, including Okowa, Ochei, Dr. Festus Okubor, Prof Sylvester Monye, Hon. Elumelu, Chief Ubielum, and Chief Peter Okocha.

    A source said that these aggrieved aspirants are not indifferent to the power of the governor to install a successor. But, they may gang up against him at the primaries and attempt to frustrate his ambition. For example, Okowa believes that he should be the next candidate because he was prevailed upon by Ibori to step down for Uduaghan in 2007.

    At the weekend, some party chieftains warned against imposition, adding that it may create a crack on the wall. “We now have an opposition party in Delta State and, if we don’t handle our primaries well, the APC is there. We should put our house in order.”

    Another chieftain said: “There is agitation for zoning. There is also another agitation against zoning. The PDP has structures. We have elders. We have a national leadership. Already, it can be said that crisis is brewing. But, the there will be a solution, if we are ready to embrace truth, fair play, reconciliation and justice. Times are changing and we should be sensitive.”

     

     

     

     

  • ‘I’ll reposition Lagos to realise its potential’

    ‘I’ll reposition Lagos to realise its potential’

    Akintoye Branco-Rhodes is a Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) aspirant in Lagos. In this interview with Deputy Political Editor RAYMOND MORDI, he speaks on his mission in politics and chances at the primaries. 

    Why do you want to serve as the governor?

    I am trying to free Lagos to release its potential and to reposition Lagos for its very great potentials in Nigeria and the West African sub-region. This is the reason why I’ve come forward to bring out the best of Lagos and Lagosians.

    If you are given the opportunity, what would you do differently from what Governor Fashola has been doing?

    The credentials that I have is that I am an energy expert and I know that Lagos State requires electricity for transformation; it requires patriotic service to the people. Lagos State requires clarity of vision and purpose. These are the things I would be bringing on the table.

    Why are you running under the platform of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP)?

    Even the best has to give way for others to push the frontiers forward. The APC has overstayed its welcome in Lagos. They’ve been here in the last 16 years and as you know, absolute power corrupts absolutely.  By their total dominance of the space for the 16 years, they have become anti-people in the kind of policies they’ve been implementing. That is why I feel very strongly that the PDP holds the potentials to dislodge the APC and reposition Lagos for the next phase of development.

    What are some of the anti-people policies you are talking about?

    Everybody that lives in Lagos is under one oppressive law or the other. One, multiple taxation; two, multiple levies; three, they’ve turned all agencies of government into revenue generators. It’s not bad, if they are just mere revenue generators, but they go to the extreme of taking this revenue from the people and that has left a sour taste in the mouth of the people. It is that yearning for freedom that I am bringing to the table.

    Lagos is not an oil-producing state yet and it derives much of its revenue from taxation. If you become governor and you do away with taxation, how would you get the money to run the state?

    Our plans are to enlarge the economy. If we enlarge the economy, there would be enough income tax to run the state; that’s where they failed. Their approach actually stifles the economy and when the economy is stifled, you will require force to bring in income. We are looking at enlarging the economy to empower more people to participate in the economy. Lagos is a megacity and has the mass of the people in place already. But what needs to be done is to increase the earning power of the people, to bring in the youths, which is a vibrant engine room of any economy. We also intend to reposition existing businesses in Lagos for expansion, to enable them participate in the general welfare of the state.

    What makes you think that the electorate would vote for the PDP this time?

    The PDP has not governed Lagos because, as you know, there is a time for everything under heaven.That is why we believe we would accomplish that goal this time around in 2015.

    What previous experience do you have that qualifies you to govern Lagos?

    I’ve been in politics for the last 23 years. I’ve always stood for the people in my entire political sojourn. I’ve been in business for the last 30 years and during that time, I’ve seen the tremendous potential of Lagos. I have proposed several solutions to Lagos State Government, but they were rejected. We must stamp out corruption. We must build a state that would cater for everybody, from the young to the old.

    There is this perception that the PDP at the centre has neglected Lagos.  What is your own take on it?

    What I know is that we would bring the Transformation Agenda of the President to every Lagosian.

    Do you think it’s a good policy?

    The Transformation Agenda…

    No, trying to discriminate against states that are not governed by the PDP?

    I don’t think there’s been a disconnect between the Presidency and the Lagos State; if there is, I don’t think it is deliberate because I believe the interest of the Presidency is the success of every state in the country. I don’t see any move to negate the state because it is not a PDP state.

    Is the PDP going to consider zoning and religion in picking a candidate for the Lagos governorship election in 2015?

    Well, I don’t know about zoning or religion. I think they are just going to consider the best candidate for the job.

    To what extent do you think stomach infrastructure is going to affect the governorship election in Lagos in 2015?

    It’s sad and very sad that lives of Nigerians meaning well for a better life would be reduced to temporary stomach needs. That is a very sad commentary and a reflection of the state of affairs in Nigeria. I believe that we should have gone beyond stomach infrastructure, by talking about a Nigeria where everybody has a sense of belonging; where patriotic leadership is meted out to the ordinary Nigerian citizens and where the aspirations of the ordinary Nigerians is captured in good governance. I think when we build a democracy where Nigerians can connect with the issues, then we would have built a democracy of our dreams.

    To what extent do you think the PDP is going to use the federal might or the resources available to it from the centre to prosecute the governorship election in Lagos?

    We are working very hard to make it an issue-based contest. We are presenting the issues, we are presenting our score cards and we are saying mark us based on what we say and what we do for the improvement of the lot of the people.

     

     

  • PDP stakeholders back Mark

    PDP stakeholders back Mark

    Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) stakeholders in Benue South Senatorial District have endorsed Senate President David Mark as their candidate for next year’s senatorial election.

    At a meeting at the weekend at Double K Hotel in Otukpo, Benue State, national and state lawmakers from Zone C, PDP chieftains, youths and women leaders, in a voice vote, adopted Mark as the sole candidate for the election.

    Mark, who was represented by Minister of Interior Abba Morro, said he was overwhelmed by the people’s confidence in him, saying he would not disappoint them.

    State PDP Chairman Agbo Emmanuel said it would be “injustice” if Mark was not returned to the senate, urging other aspirants to support the Senate president.

    Former Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Defense, Chief Mike Okibo, has indicated interest in the senatorial seat.

     

     

  • Ogun PDP woos LP members

    Ogun PDP woos LP members

    TheChairman of the Ogun State Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Chief  Bayo Dayo, has urged Labour Party(LP) members to join the PDP.

    Dayo spoke at a rally in Ijebu-Igbo, where he received over 250 defectors from the Accord Party(AP) and the All Progressives Congress(APC).

    He said the APC leader, Governor Ibikunle Amosun and the LP leader, former Governor Gbenga Daniel, cannot lead the state to the promised land.

    Dayo urged the defectors, including the LP Chairman in Ijebu East Local Government, Mr Ganiyu Ishola, to work for the success of the PDP in Ijebu East Senatorial District.

    He said Daniel has been dropping the name of President Goodluck Jonathan, thereby creating the impression that they can be relevant through the back door.

    Dayo described the LP as a sinking ship, urging the members to desert it before it is too late.

    PDP chieftain Dapo Abiodun, who attended the rally, said he was in Ijebu-Igbo to hold consultation the party leader and financier in the Southwest, Prince Buruji Kashamu, stressing he would make the outcome of the consultation known to party supporters soon.