Tag: PDP

  • PDP ‘undecided’ on Taraba, Anambra crises

    PDP ‘undecided’ on Taraba, Anambra crises

    The leadership of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) appears to be undecided on how to address the festering political crises in Taraba and Anambra States.

    The PDP controlled Taraba is currently in crisis as a result of sharp divisions between the camps of ailing Governor Danbaba Suntai and Acting Governor, Garba Umar.

    Ailing Suntai was brought into the country in an apparent near vegetable state on August 25, after a 10-month medical sojourn abroad. On arrival, he had to be assisted off the chartered aircraft that brought him to Abuja.

    While his loyalists are insisting that he had resumed duty, the Taraba Assembly had mandated Umar to continue governing the state in acting capacity, they declared him unfit to continue as the state chief security officer.

    The Nigerian Constitution did not envisage the existence of Governor and Acting Governor administering a state at the same time.

    However, the newly inaugurated National Working Committee (NWC) of the party, at its meeting on Monday, did not discuss the Taraba problem, despite strident calls by stakeholders in the state for the national leadership of the party to make its position known on the crisis.

    Briefing journalists after a meeting, the party’s National Publicity Secretary, Chief Olisa Metuh, said the issue of Taraba did not come up at the meeting. The meeting was chaired by the National Chairman of the PDP, Alhaji Bamanga Tukur.

    “We did not discuss the issue of Taraba at the meeting because the matter was not listed on the agenda. I will raise the matter in our next meeting and feed you back on whatever position the party takes,” Metuh said.

    The spokesman also said the meeting did not discuss the problem in Anambra State, where two parallel candidates have emerged as PDP flag bearers for the November 16 governorship election in the state.

     

     

  • PDP: Torn apart by ego, strife and rancour

    PDP: Torn apart by ego, strife and rancour

    The special convention of the ruling Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) in Abuja has ended in a fiasco as prominent members raised a parallel leadership to protest the perceived  exclusion in the fold by the dominant power bloc.

    When the ruling Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) chieftains converged on Eagle Square, Abuja, for its special convention, little did its national leader, President Goodluck Jonathan, and national chairman, Alhaji Bamanga Tukur, know that the exercise will end in a fiasco. Instead of uniting the warring chieftains, the convention generated more bitterness, which eventually led to the split of the party.

    President Jonathan entered the venue around 11.35 am, waving to the 3,500 delegates from the troubled state chapters. He was accompanied by the disputed Nigerian Governors’ Forum chairman, Plateau State Governor David Jang, some governors who belong to the faction and other aides. Barely two hours later, news got to him that a faction had emerged from the party. Immediately, reality dawned on the President, who had exuded bravado over the PDP strength, while reeling his achievements on the podium in a clownish manner, that the party was suddenly ebbing away.

    The President, his deputy, Alhaji Namadi Sambo, Board of Trustees (BoT) chairman Chief Tony Anenih, Convention Committee Chairman , Senator Jerry Gana, and Convention Electoral Panel Chairman Senator Ken Nnamani were visibly worried. They made enquires, which confirmed their fear. At the nearby Sheu Musa Yar’Adua Centre, former Vice President Atiku Abubakar, who has a presidential ambition, was glued to the drawing board. With him were the aggrieved chieftains-Governors Sule Lamido (Jigawa State), Musa Kwakwanso (Kano), Muritala Nyako (Adamawa), Aliyu Muazu (Niger) Rotimi Amaechi (Rivers) and Aliyu Wamakko (Sokoto); former Governors Shaba Lafiagi (Kwara), Adamu Abdullahi (Nasarawa), former Deputy National Chairman Sam Jaja and other chieftains, who had stormed out of the convention. .

    They had a pre-determined agenda. After brainstorming for few minutes, Atiku and his group installed the former Acting National Chairman, Alhaji Kawu Baraje, an associate of former Governor Bukola Saraki, as the PDP factional chairman. Before the convention, there were speculations that the “G5” members may boycott the convention. Thus, when they strolled in, there was a temporary relief. However, when they hurriedly left the venue, the mood at the convention changed instantly. It was a spontaneous reaction. More delegates moved out to seek for further information about the unfolding drama. Suddenly, the power equation in the party was altered. Since there is no permanent friend in politics, but permanent interest, the forces loyal to Obasanjo and Atiku foot-soldiers started a new co-habitation.

    On the day the acclaimed largest party in Africa celebrated its 14th birthday, the big political family was torn apart by pride, prejudice, ego and clash of ambitions. Delegates, who expressed worry over the turn of events, attributed the tragedy to the weak national leadership, which ultimately failed to broker reconciliation effectively and prevent the damage. It was evident that 2015 calculations had polarised the octopus, judging by the clandestine moves by the key factional leaders.

    To observers, it was an explosion waiting to happen. The founding fathers at the venue, including Chief Don Etiebet, Senator Olu Alabi, Alhaji Abba Gana, Chief Jim Nwodobo and Chief Peter Odili were in sober reflection. None of them could avert the impending doom. Many party members said that they were caught unaware. The slippery party and its unpredictable leadership were boxed into a new phase of crisis. Bayelsa State Governor Seriake Dickson, who heads a reconciliation team, was jolted out of the delusion of possible rapprochement. So were many other leaders who nodded at the party’s decline in influence.

    The handwriting was bold on the wall. But the signs of an imminent danger was flagrantly ignored by over-confident party lords basking in the euphoria of incumbency of power. The chief servant of Niger State, Muazu, had stirred controversy when he alleged that the President had a pact with some undisclosed Northern leaders to spend one term in office. The disclosure generated tension in the party. It has not been resolved. The mini-convention was organised to correct the costly mistake made 17 months ago when national officers were elected without following the due process. But, as alleged by the seven governors, who stormed out of the convention, more unpardonable mistakes were committed at the event.

    Senator Abdullahi alleged that there was wrongful exclusion of delegates at the convention, saying that the act smacked of injustice. Echoing him, the Turaki Adamawa, Alhaji Abubakar said that the party had been badly managed. Four states-Adamawa, Anambra, Nasarawa and Rivers-were bones of contention. Only statutory delegates from these crisis-ridden chapters were allowed to vote by Convention Committee. Gana explained that the committee opted for that method, owing to the division in the chapters. “There are two executive committees of the party in Adamawa. Therefore, we said that only statutory delegates should vote”, he explained. “We are devoted to transparency. That is why the event is beamed live on the television. This is one of the best conventions”, Gana added.

    A source said that there was communication problem between the big wigs from the affected states and the Convention Planning Committee. Although Gana’s committee also included other non-voting delegates as observers, it was doubtful, if the aggrieved governors got the message from Senator Bello and Senator Jonathan Zwuigina, who were mandated to verify the delegates list. In fact, the excluded delegates from Adamawa threatened to go to court after the convention to challenge the basis for their exclusion.

    Other chapters went to the convention with their acrimonies. For example, there was commotion at the Anambra camp. The supporters of the Tony Nwoye, the governorship candidate recognised by the party, and Senator Andy Uba, who is in court challenging Nwoye’s victory at the primaries, exchanged blows. Nwoye’s men claimed that the Uba brothers; Andy and Chris; were not part of the delegates, since they have been expelled. But Uba’s supporters said that the court has put the suspension on hold. A similar quarrel was recorded among Adamawa delegates.

    In Ogun, the pro-Obasanjo supporters abstained from the national congress, which was also boycotted by the former President. In fact, the delegates from the Southwest were not complete because the zonal congress, which should have produced the zonal officers could not hold due to protracted litigation. Also, the Convention Committee postponed the election into the office of the National Secretary because the former secretary, Prince Olagunsoye Oyinlola, is still in court challenging his removal.

    Also, only anti-Amaechi delegates from Rivers State were accredited. It is a pointer to the future. A federal legislator said the national leadership, which had called for reconciliation, was also inadvertently fuelling the crisis between the President and Amaechi, who is currently on suspension, to ensure that the governor’s camp is liquidated, ahead of 2015. “How can there be peace when the leadership is insincere?”, asked the lawmaker.

    Some delegates from the Southwest also grumbled. They claimed that the zone may continue to be marginalised, in the absence of a National Secretary and National Vice Chairmen, which was expected to emerge from the region. Some also said that Obasanjo’s absence at the convention had implications for the party. “Obasanjo as the former President and national leader has his influence and usefulness too. To be frank, I think the President should have mended fences with the old man”, said a delegate from Ogun.

    When Kwakwanso and Wamakko entered Eagle Square, Northern delegates swarmed them. A group suddenly emerged, canvassing support for Lamido-.Amaechi ticket in 2015. Other delegates were amused by their campaigns. Tha members to close ranks. The Acting National Secretary, Dr.Remi Akitoye, who had observed that the party had faced cases of indiscipline, advised the members to avoid anti-party activities.

    Tukur, the man in the eye of the storm, had also before the split, called for unity for the PDP to retain the leadership of the country. But reacting to the emergence of the Atiku faction, the national chairman chided the arrowheads of the faction. “They are treacherous”, he said, predicting that the faction would soon eclipse. What has given him the confidence that the faction may wither away is that the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), which monitored the convention at the Eagle Square, will recognise him as the authentic PDP chairman.

    The PDP Governors’ Forum chairman, Chief Godswill Akpabio of Akwa Ibom State, also dismissed the threat posed by the faction. He questioned the basis for splitting the party after attending the convention. Earlier, in his address to the delegates, he said “there is no shaking”. But when news filtered that the faction meant business, he still summoned the courage to say that there is no cause for alarm.

    To former Adamawa State Governor Boni Haruna, an associate of Atiku, who stayed behind at the convention, what has happened to the PDP is not new. He said there is the tendency to attribute it to desperation. But he quickly added that, if the leadership had responded to the complaints and yearnings of the aggrieved members, trouble would have been averted.

    Many observers believed that PDP’s future is bleak, if the faction fails to retrace its steps. The party has a number of options. According to concerned party leaders, reconciliation is not foreclosed, despite the obvious split. “We will do genuine reconciliation and there will be peace”, said former Federal capital Territory (FCT) Minister, Alhaji Abba-Gana, a delegate from Borno State.

    It is believed that the aggrieved chieftains are only scheming for more “party power” and influence in the polarised fold by evolving a formidable platform for negotiation and bargaining. Indeed, the retracing of steps is not ruled out. The civil war in the PDP has no ideological connotation. Both divides are struggling for the soul of the party and the Presidency. There is no assurance that whichever side that wins the battle will muster the strength to reposition the country for progress and excellence.

    Indisputably, many party chieftains agree that the factionalisation may have reduced the party’s numerical strength in the National Assembly. The implication is that the President may begin to face more heat from the parliament.

    But the Baraje faction cannot survive by mere propaganda. For now, the composition is laced with ethnic colouration. Apart from Amaechi and Oyinlola, the majority of the factional members are from the North. A source said that spin doctors may attack the faction by blackmailing its members as ethnic bigots canvassing for power shift to the North under the leadership of Atiku, who may emerge as a presidential contender in 2015.

    If reconciliation fails and the two factions go there separate ways, then, there will be a big hurdle for the PDP in 2015. But Baraje’s faction cannot totally liquidate the main PDP without the cooperation of other opposition parties. Last week, the Peoples Democratic Movement, which is believed to have a strong link with Atiku, said that it will seal alliance with the opposition. If APC, PDM and Voice of the people (VOP) combine their forces, 2015 may be the terminal year for the PDP.

    The strength of the factional leaders lies in their fanatical loyalists and supporters in the Northwest states of Sokoto, Kano, Jigawa and Adamawa, and North Central comprising Niger, Kwara, Nasarawa and Benue. In fact, the PDP can hardly joke with the Northwest voting population, which may slip off from its reach. Already, the Southwest appears to be a no-go area for the ruling party. In the Southsouth, PDP can hardly boast of majority support in Edo and Rivers state. In the Northeast, votes for the PDP has dropped in Borno and Yobe. Now, the party may not have hope in Adamawa, if Atiku and Nyako maintain their hold on the state.

    In the days of Obasanjo, a group led by the late Chief Sunday Awoniyi, moved out of the PDP to form another political party. The new party did not see the light of the day. Will Baraje’s faction achieved its desired objectives? Time will tell.

  • PDP splits as Atiku, others sack Tukur

    PDP splits as Atiku, others sack Tukur

    •Baraje emerges new PDP National Chairman
    •Berates Tukur for lack of democracy
    •Cites Presidency for conspiracy

    The ruling Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) could not have got a more bizarre birthday present yesterday.

    On the occasion of the 15th anniversary of its emergence, the ‘largest party in Africa’ as its leaders are fond of referring to it, broke into two under a long –predicted implosion.

    And it all happened before a large crowd of leaders, including President Goodluck Jonathan, and party supporters from across the nation.

    The occasion was its Special Convention primed to take crucial decisions ahead of the 2015 elections.

    Some influential members, led by former Vice President Atiku Abubakar, seven governors, three former governors and federal legislators who had been complaining about the way the party was being run by the Bamanga Tukur-led National Executive Committee, walked out of the convention and proceeded to address a press conference where they announced the sack of the party’s embattled national chairman, Alhaji Bamanga Tukur, and the replacement of his national executive committee with a new one headed by Alhaji Kawu Baraje, a onetime acting national chairman of the party.

    The faction also named former governor of Osun State, Prince Olagunsoye Oyinlola, as National Secretary, the same position he occupied before a court ruling forced him out, and Dr. Sam Jaja as Deputy National Chairman

    Other members of the new National Working Committee are expected to be announced tomorrow.

    Amidst backslapping and liberation songs, the PDP leaders said there was no going back in putting a new leadership in place for PDP.

    Those at the session were Atiku, Oyinlola, Governors Sule Lamido (Jigawa); Rabiu Kwankwaso (Kano); Abdulafatah Ahmed (Kwara); Babangida Aliyu (Niger); Aliyu Wammako (Sokoto); Murtala Nyako (Adamawa); and Rotimi Amaechi (Rivers).

    Others were the Deputy Governor of Sokoto State, Mukhtar Shagari; Deputy Governor of Niger State, Musa Ibeto; Deputy Governor of Adamawa State, Bala Ngilari; ex- Nasarawa Governor Abdullahi Adamu (a former Secretary of the Board of Trustees of the PDP); and ex- Kwara Governor Mohammed Sha’aba Lafiagi.

    Also in attendance were some members of the National Assembly, including the Chairman of the House Committee on Finance, Abdulmumini Jibril; Chairman of the House Committee on Media and Public Affairs, Mohammed Zakary; Dakuku Peterside; Senator Magnus Abe; and all statutory delegates and members of the National Assembly from the seven states.

    As the presence of each of the political heavyweights was announced, shout of “Chanji dole 2015’ (Change in 2015 A Must) filled the hall.

    The confidence radiated by all the governors suggested that some notable leaders of the party were pulling the strings to effect change in PDP.

    Baraje, a former National Secretary of the party, spoke of “increasing repression, restrictions of freedom of association, arbitrary suspension of members and other such violations of democratic principles by a faction of our party led by Alhaji Bamanga Tukur.”

    He said all efforts to draw the attention of critical stakeholders within the party to the dangers inherent in the course being charted by that leadership came to nought and “it has become very clear that the desperate permutations towards 2015 general elections have blinded certain people from the consequences of their actions.”

    He added:”Not only has the constitution of the party been serially violated by Alhaji Tukur and fellow travellers, all the organs of the party have been rendered virtually ineffectual by a few people who act as though they are above the law.

    “Unfortunately, it is obvious that they get encouragement from the presidency, whose old calculations are geared towards shutting out any real or imagined opposition ahead of the party’s presidential primaries for the 2015 elections.

    “As leaders of our great party, we consider it a sacred responsibility to save the PDP from the antics of a few desperadoes who have no democratic temperament and are therefore bent on hijacking the party for selfish ends. While the list of their violations of the tenets of our great party is long, we will highlight just a few:

    *The National Executive Committee of the PDP at its belated meeting of 20 June 2013 approved 20 July 2013 for the conduct of a special national convention. However, that date was changed to August 31 without reverting to NEC (the only authority vested with such powers) by a few people, apparently acting on the authority of the presidency.

    *Notwithstanding the fact that INEC had noted that the PDP congresses in nine states were not presently conducted, the illegal delegates from such states are being paraded at the so-called convention being held today (yesterday) in a cynical attempt to circumvent the law and further bring the name of the party to disrepute.

    *In gross violation of the PDP constitution which stipulates that the NEC meeting must hold at least once in a quarter, Alhaji Bamanga Tukur and a few people have been running the party like a personal fiefdom without recourse to that important decision-making organ of the party.

    *The NEC of the party accepted the resignation of the former members of the NWC whose offices were affected by INEC observations based principally on the agreement that the affected officers would be returned to their respective offices at the convention. However, against the decision of the NEC and in a not-so-clever bid to exclude some perceived opponents of the few powerful members who are trying to hijack the party, these positions have been made to some Yes-men within the party.

    •Notwithstanding INEC’s instance that Senator Any Uba is the duly elected candidate of the party in Anambra State and against the background that he is so recognized by majority of our party members, the Bamanga Tukur-led Executives announced a purported suspension of Senator Uba and some other members close to him in defiance of subsisting court orders.

    •Despite that the PDP Constitution is very clear that the state chapter of the party cannot discipline a national officer, the Deputy National Chairman, Mr. Sam Jaja, has reportedly been dismissed by some renegades who have hijacked the Rivers State chapter of our party with the connivance of the Bamanga Tukur leadership.

    •The persistent change in the list of the party’s delegates in many states as part of a deliberate attempt to rig the party’s nomination of candidates, especially at the presidential and gubernatorial levels, with a view to foisting on the PDP some unpopular candidates who are bound to lose at the polls.

    •The suspension without due process of the Governors of Rivers and Sokoto states. Even when the illegal suspension on Sokoto State Governor has been lifted, the Rivers Governor remains purportedly suspended for no just cause.

    •The illegal dissolution of the Adamawa State chapter of the party is a clear abuse of power by Alhaji Bamanga Tukur thus causing confusion in his home state.

    “Given the foregoing, it is very clear that the Bamanga Tukur leadership cannot guarantee for our millions of party members democracy anchored on free choice and the rule of law. We have therefore taken it upon ourselves to rescue the party from their dictatorial leadership.

    “It is indeed noteworthy that from 1999 to date, Nigerians have constantly voted the presidential candidates presented by our great party but not only does such trust come with enormous responsibility, we recognise that we cannot continue to take the people for granted.

    “From now, the new leadership of the party under us will strive to build a fairer as well as a more transparent and accountable PDP that will put that interest of members and indeed all the people of Nigeria above that of one single individual.

    “For all the members of our great party who may have become disillusioned by the anti-democratic tendencies of the Bamanga Tukur leadership, there is a new lease of life in the horizon. It s a new day for the Peoples Democratic Party.

    “As we take over the leadership of the PDP, our immediate priority is to revive the culture of robust debate of all contending issues while providing a level-playing field for all our members. These were the ideals that differentiated our party from others and endeared us to Nigerians.

    “We are not, and have never been, a political party where one man would be taking decisions for all members and where once you do not kowtow before the presidency, you are deemed a rebel that must be crushed. That is not the PDP bequeathed to us by our founding fathers. That, I dare say, is no longer what PDP under our leadership will represent from today.”

     

  • PDP is losing out, says Atiku

    PDP is losing out, says Atiku

    •Why we sacked Tukur, others-Ex-VP

    Former Vice-President Atiku Abubakar, yesterday, threw light on the emergence of a new National Working Committee for the PDP.

    He said the party had derailed from its mission and was being run by those who lack knowledge of party politics.

    Atiku, dressed in a white babanriga, savoured the moment as the seven governors and party leaders conceded to him the right to answer journalists’ questions after the speech of the factional National Chairman of PDP, Alhaji Kawu Baraje.

    He cited alleged frustration in the land and said the generality of Nigerians are disappointed with the PDP administration.His words: “Today is a very historic day in the life of our party. It is also a day of mixed feelings. It could also be a day of happiness. It could also be a sad day.

    “Sad because the party we conceived in 1998 to be a rallying point for all Nigerians to be a source of unity, to be a party that will fulfil the aspirations of Nigerians, has today been dragged down by people who don’t even understand what party politics is all about. I have always been trying to draw the attention of leaders of our party, and the leaders of government that this democratic dispensation is supposed to make things better for the people of this country. Let us not deceive ourselves, the country is full of frustrations; the country is full of anger; full of disappointment.

    “Therefore, we have a responsibility to see how we can reform our great party so that those lofty ideals, lofty goals can be achieved.

    They cannot be achieved by the present leadership of the party.

    “It cannot be achieved even by the presidency.”He said that he had always emphasised that the party was headed in the wrong direction. “We are losing the party, we are losing the government, and for these very courageous people seated here, this idea was mooted to see whether we still have men with courage and determination to get up and stand up.”

    He appealed to other party members to join them to restore what he called “the values of the founding fathers of this party.”

  • Split: Fear grips S/south PDP leaders

    Split: Fear grips S/south PDP leaders

    •Amaechi supporters to reactivate parallel exco in Rivers

    Panic gripped leaders of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) in the South-South yesterday following the latest twist to the crisis rocking the party, which saw the emergence of a parallel leadership of the party.

    Alhaji Atiku Abubakar, a former Vice President and eight governors on the platform of the party, yesterday, walked out of the party’s convention and immediately convened a mini convention which culminated in the return of Abubakar Baraje as the new chairman of the splinter PDP.

    Although President Goodluck Jonathan, whose perceived second term bid is one of the factors in the current crisis, told delegates at the conference that PDP will “become stronger”, our investigation revealed that leaders of the party from his zone were shaken by the development.

    A very top member and a national officer of the party told our reporter, “We are greatly concerned in spite of the bold faces we are putting up in public. PDP has had crises in the past and we have come out one way or the other. This is different because it is the first time we would have a parallel leadership of the party.

    “That a former Vice President has pulled out with seven or eight governors is a cause for concern no matter what anybody says,” added our source, who asked not to be named in this report.

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Another source, who is member of the Felix Obuah-led PDP in Rivers State, expressed concern that Saturday’s development may pave the way for defection by elected officials of the party.

    “The law allows an elected party official to cross carpet (sic) if there is a crisis in his party. But there was ambiguity in what crisis in the party really means – is it crisis at the national or ward level? And other such questions.

    “When with the crisis at the national level – we definitely have a crisis when you have eight of our governors forming a parallel leadership, led by no other person than a former chairman and you have the former National Secretary, Olagunsoye Oyinlola as regaining the position he held! This is definitely a crisis and I disagree with those saying no cause for alarm,” our source stated.

    A number of the party’s leader across the six states of the South-South who spoke with our reporter expressed the same concern.

    “Nobody wants to go out and say this on national television or news paper, but we are now vulnerable because dissatisfied governors like (Chibuike) Amaechi of Rivers State and others can now openly defect to other parties because there is indeed crisis in PDP.”

    Already, it was gathered that members of the party loyal to Amaechi in the state were getting ready to resuscitate the party’s structure and run it side by side the Obuah faction.

     

  • PDP’s split may lead to grand coalition with APC—sources

    PDP’s split may lead to grand coalition with APC—sources

    THERE were strong indications yesterday in Abuja that the emergence of a faction of the Peoples Democratic Party at the party’s mini convention may be the beginning of a grand design to form a powerful coalition with the All Progressives Congress towards the 2015 elections.

    According to a highly placed member of the faction, who spoke to our correspondent last night, those who thought the PDP remains the party to beat in the forthcoming elections should have a rethink as Nigerians would soon be witnessing the coalition of all the political forces into one grand party including the APC.

    Explaining why seven governors and former Vice President Atiku Abubakar walked out of the mini-convention, the source said the aggrieved persons could no longer tolerate a situation where a party presumed to be the largest political gathering in Africa is subjected to the whim of one man.

    He said when it became apparent that those who hijacked the party’s machinery were not ready to toe the path of peace, the only option left for those interested engendering party discipline was to form its own faction and seek for people of like minds in other parties wherever they may be found.

    He said: “Let me tell you something that will shock you. Don’t ever think that this is just another political ploy to score cheap political points. This is clearly more than that. Very soon, Nigerians would see the kind of political merger that has never been witnessed in the history of this country. I am talking of a merger that will break all the barriers.

    “I am aware that some people are busy deceiving themselves that they will win the 2015 elections through the support of their kith and kin. But they forget that the North-west and the Southwest account for over 51 per cent of all the votes cast in the country. We know our game plan and when we finally merge, we will see how far they can go with that arrogance.

    “The time has come for someone to put an end to the impunity and abuse of power. We have waited for long to see if common sense would prevail. But it is clear that those urging the leadership of the party to go on have taken our patience for granted for too long. We will soon show them that, in this game of politics, number plays an important role and we do have the number on our side.”

     

  • 2004-2007 as PDP/Nigeria’s years of hope: fact or  El-Rufai’s delusional fantasy?

    2004-2007 as PDP/Nigeria’s years of hope: fact or El-Rufai’s delusional fantasy?

    I must start this piece by stating that I have neither read nor am I about to read Nasir Ahmad El-Rufai’s new book, The Accidental Public Servant. At some point down the line, I will read it. Some of my professional friends and political comrades whose critical judgment I trust have read the book. While they are not exactly full of praise for the book, they all say that it is worth reading. But please don’t take this as either a recommendation for El-Rufai’s new book or worse still an endorsement for it. My friends’ and comrades’ opinion of the book is not the reason why I will read it. Rather, the sole reason why I will eventually read the book is because ever since he wrote a devastating critique of the late president Yar’ Adua and his administration from a centre-right perspective while Yar’ Adua was alive, I have followed his essays and blogs closely. I have read nearly all his essays since then and I periodically visit his personal website. The only thing I resolutely shun when I visit this website is the column that invites visitors to have a glimpse of El-Rufai’s latest personal activities. This indicates to me that the man has, or wishes to have, a fan club; I leave that to that to the young, the credulous and the fellow travelers of his ideological forays into the wilderness of contemporary Nigerian elite politics.

    In my opinion, El-Rufai is quite easily the brightest and most articulate spokesperson for the centre-right ideological and political position in Nigerian politics today. Later in this piece, I shall indicate what exactly this centre-right position implies, but for now let me add that for me, El-Rufai has the added interest of being the first politician and intellectual from the North to both articulate and embody this centre-right worldview with coherence, consistency and panache. In other words, while we have had brilliant radical leftist intellectuals and dedicated and unwavering politicians and spokespersons of the right aplenty from the North we have never, in my view, had a centre-right representative of the caliber of El-Rufai from the North. [Incidentally, we have not had one from the South either!]

    Needless to say and as I hope to demonstrate in this piece anyway, I am not using these ideological terms reductively. When I shall have finished what I have to say in this piece, I hope that it would have become clear that I do not think that his centre-right views exhaust all that could be said about El-Rufai. On the strength of the things that he says in his writings and the passion with which he says them, he is quite possibly a genuine patriot and a humanist. It just so happens that a man like the subject of this essay who is as open and even aggressive about his ideological beliefs ought to be taken up on those beliefs.

    On this last point, I now move directly to the substance of this piece, El-Rufai’s passionate espousal, in a recent article titled “Stunted Potentials Hobble Our Nation”, of the claim that the years 2004-2007 during Obasanjo’s second term in the presidency marked a period of great hope and promise not only for Nigeria but for Africa and the Black race. I think that this claim is both factually erroneous and morally bogus and indefensible, but before I state my reasons for this view, it is useful to state El-Rufai’s arguments in support of this claim on their own terms.

    The bottom line in that article, “Stunted Potentials Hobble Our Nation” is the view that politics in any context is only as good as it is congruent with national aspirations. Between 2004 and 2007, states El-Rufai, there was a perfect congruence between politics and national aspirations in our country. On this claim, El-Rufai goes on to assert vigorously that those who “inherited” power after 2007 – Yar’ Adua and Jonathan – lacked such congruence on a monumental scale. “National aspirations” between 2004-2007 included such key elements like the shrinking of both the expenditure of governance and the participation of government in business; the creation of a modern national identity card system; a road map to a potential boom in the solid mineral sector to relieve the over-dependence on crude oil; strengthening of the banking system; a national mortgage system to drastically reduce a 17 million housing units deficit; and monetization of fringe benefits to reduce the lavish and wasteful lifestyles of public officeholders at the expense of the state.

    I admit it: reduced to this bare summary, there does not seem to be anything particularly extraordinary about this set of programs and ideas. But in the context of the discursive rhetoric of El-Rufai’s passionate arguments in the article, these ideas take on an urgent, visionary quality. Repeatedly, El-Rufai states again and again in the article that the vast majority of Nigerians are poor, subject to insecurity, prone to vastly inferior or inadequate hospitals, clinics and amenities while those in power wallow in obscene consumption and display of wealth. He pleads that time is not on our side, that our leaders must get their priorities right or we will sink further and further into devastation by insecurity, corruption, and poverty. One could not agree more with El-Rufai on these observations. And in a phrase that I particularly found resonant, El-Rufai in the article describes budgetary procedures in our country as a “fictographic art” full of much drama and noise but disconnected from the things that could cure governance in Nigeria of its endemic wastefulness, incompetence and paralysis.

    In contrast to all of this, El-Rufai argues in the article that between 2004 and 2007, Obasanjo’s administration charted a course that was bold, visionary and confident in its mission. Here is a sentence from the article that gives a flavor of the rhetorical flourish with which El-Rufai makes this claim: “The vision of that Obasanjo administration was to make this the last generation to merely speak of Nigeria’s potentials. We were determined to realise those potentials, confident that we had the talents to create wealth from the vast natural and human resource endowments of the country, leveraging the energies of its young people and latent assets in the Diaspora.”

    No great debating skills or prowess are needed to demolish this claim. 2004-2007 happens to coincide with Obasanjo’s second term in office. From his near impeachment close to the end of his first term (1999-2003), Obasanjo came into his second term a bitterly insecure ruler, a wounded lion who wanted to make everyone pay for his injured pride. He became paranoid toward all real and suspected enemies within and outside his party, the PDP; conversely, he demanded absolute loyalty from everybody, from members of his cabinet to the lowliest functionary of the presidential villa. He subjected the party to his absolute control. He ran government like a fiefdom, while paying lip service to respect for technocrats and a special responsiveness to foreign bilateral business and governmental powers. He ignored or even flouted decisions of the Supreme Court that went against him or his administration. He used government to enrich his cronies, sycophants and hangers-on. In some particularly notable instances, he placed mediocrities in high office, as in the case of the barely literate hair dresser that he made the Speaker of the House of Representatives. In some states of the federation, he installed stark illiterates like Andy Ubah and Lamidi Adedibu as political godfathers with more real power and authority than the executive governors of the states concerned. In the year 2006, he had a prolonged, bitter feud with his Vice President, Abubakar Atiku, in which both men voluntarily revealed how gross and unconscionable they were in looting the coffers of the nation to enrich themselves and their cronies. Perhaps the most important economic legacy of his rule was a massive transfer of wealth into a few hands at the expense of the vast majority of Nigerians. And his rule ended with the disgrace of his failed bid to have a third term in office, but not before he had taken the whole country through extremely bitter, cynical and divisive elite politics.

    Is it the case that, in making the claim that this period marked years of hope and promise for Nigeria, El-Rufai is ignorant of these universally known facts of Obasanjo’s performance in office between 2004 and 2007? No, absolutely not, for El-Rufai was in the thick of it all as one of two or three of the most trusted of Obasanjo’s loyalists during the period. As a matter of fact, El-Rufai presided over the privatisation of state and public enterprises through which a vast transfer of wealth to private hands was made in those years of Obasanjo’s second term. More specifically, El-Rufai was objectively an accomplice to the subordination of the party to Obasanjo’s personal megalomaniacal control; he provided both the practical muscle and the justificatory rhetoric for how a “strong leader” with a sense of mission and “national aspirations” could and should bypass ignorant and backward party bosses. Of course, it was not the case that the PDP was ever much of a disciplined, enlightened and patriotic party. But both Obasanjo and his loyal servitor, El-Rufai, belonged to the party and they putatively held their cabinet posts at the pleasure and in furtherance of the aims of the party.

    I understand that in his new book, El-Rufai is highly critical of Obasanjo, though reportedly in a careful, muted and nuanced manner. As I remarked earlier in this piece, I have not read the book so I don’t know the distance he has traveled between the book and this more recent article in which El-Rufai aggressively touts Obasanjo as a ruler who, between 2004 and 2007, seemed to be Nigeria’s, Africa’s and the Black race’ answer to all our problems. I would argue that this issue throws some light on what I said earlier in this piece about the centre-right worldview and praxis of El-Rufai. Stripped of all the rhetoric, the central ideas of El-Rufai in the article under review here are, one, that the market, not the government, should be the motive force of the economy and, two, once the state or the government has provided the basic infrastructures, it should sell off all state and public assets and enterprises to those who have the means to buy them. But since in ideology what is left unsaid or unspecified is as important as what is said and specified, we must note that it is out of a deliberate silence that El-Rufai completely leaves out the matter of how those to whom public wealth is transferred come by the means with which to buy and own public assets. In the Nigerian case, the answer to this all-important question is that it is the same state, the same government from whom they get the means to buy and buy cheaply from the state or government.

    On a closing note, let me remark that in the article I have been discussing in this piece, El-Rufai never once mentions the PDP by name. The only party that he mentions is the newly formed APC and this is strictly only to suggest that the “agenda” of Obasanjo in those years between 2004 and 2007 should be the only agenda of the APC. And even then, his faith is not really in that party; rather, it is in a strong leader with the vision and will to complete, in El-Rufai’s own words, what those who “inherited” power from Obasanjo could not accomplish – the “mission” spelt out in the “national aspirations” articulated by Obasanjo in those pregnant, promising years. This “leaderism” is the right-wing core of El-Rufai’s centrist faith in a market-driven economy under the expert management of efficiency-minded technocrats. I understand that after he decamped from the PDP, El-Rufai joined the CPC. That party has fused with others into the newly formed APC and as a consequence, El-Rufai is hedging his bets on the APC. In Nigerian elite politics, we know only too well of the phenomenon of AGIP – Any Government In Power. Thanks to El-Rufai, let us now also recognise APIP – Any Party In Power.

    Biodun Jeyifo

    bjeyifo@fas.harvard.edu

  • PDP Mini-Convention: Four governors battle Sambo

    PDP Mini-Convention: Four governors battle Sambo

    Though the mini convention of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) is a few weeks away, underground schemings among stakeholders in the party have already reached a high pitch. And one position that would be keenly contested is the office of the National Organising Secretary, which is said to be the engine room of all electoral activities in the party. While the Vice President, Namadi Sambo, is allegedly backing the former occupant of the post, Abubakar Mustapha, Governors Sule Lamido (Jigawa); Rabiu Kwankwaso (Kano); Aliyu Wammako (Sokoto) and Usman Dakingari (Kebbi) are throwing their weight behind a former PDP NWC member, Bala Kaoje. On the other hand, some forces close to President Goodluck Jonathan are also alleged to be supporting one Ibrahim Bamali, who hails from Zaria in Kaduna State.

  • PDP Convention: Secondus, Chikwe, Metuh elected

    Former National Organising Secretary of Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Prince Uche Secondus has been elected as  the  Deputy National Chairman of the party with 2241 votes.
    Abubakar Mustapha who vacated the seat of National Organising Secretary in June reclaimed the position with 2125 votes.
    Mr. Victor Kwom who also resigned the position in June was the only candidate for the position in Saturday’s contest and was declared winner as Legal Adviser.
    Onwe Solomon Onwe who was kicked out as Deputy National Secretary won the position back with 2051 votes.
    A fresh contestant, Bala Buhari won the position of National Treasurer with 2181 votes.
    Chief Olisa Metuh was returned as National Publicity Secretary, while Mrs. Kema Chikwe reclaimed the position of National Woman Leader.

    The winners were endorsed by power brokers in the party a day before the convention. The PDP Governors’ Forum had met late Friday night at the Akwa Ibom Governoar’s lodge where the rash of endorsements was ratified.

  • Why we sacked Tukur, others-Atiku

    Former Vice-President, Alhaji Atiku Abubakar, has  given an  insight on why a new National Working Committee was inaugurated  for the Peoples Democratic Party.
    He said the party has derailed from its mission and it is being run by those who do not know anything about party politics.
    Decked in white Babanriga, the ex-Vice-President savoured the moment  as the seven  governors and party leaders conceded the right to speak to the press to him after the address of the new factional National Chairman of PDP, Alhaji Kawu Baraje.
    He said there is frustration in the country and Nigerians are disappointed with PDP administration.
    Atiku said: “Today is a very historic day in the life of our party. It is also a day of mixed feelings. It could also be a day of of happiness. It could also be a sad. Sad because the party we conceived in 1998 to be a rallying point for all Nigerians to be a source of unity, to be a party that will fulfill  the aspirations of Nigerians, has today be dragged down by people who don’t even understand what party politics is all about.
    ” So, or sometimes I have always been trying to draw attention of leaders of our party, and the leaders of government that this democratic dispensation is supposed to make things better for the people of this country.
    “Let us not deceive ourselves, the country is full of frustration, the country is full of anger, is full disappointment, therefore we have a responsibility, to see how we can reform  our great party so that those lofty ideals, lofty goals can be achieved. They can not be achieved by the present leadership of the party. It cannot be achieved even by the presidency.
    ” I have said it before and I am saying it again, that we are going in a wrong direction, now we have seen the result.
    ” We are losing the party, we are losing the government, and for this very courageous people seated here, this idea was mooted to see whether we still have men with courage and determination to get up and stand up.
    “I will therefore want to appeal to the rest of our party members who are still sitting on the fence to join this new PDP.
    “I want to assure you we will restore the values of the founding fathers of this party. Let me thank all you for the courage and support to stand up because some people will be hiding somewhere. By the grace of God with your support, with your loyalty, the change will be achieved,” Atiku stated