Tag: pension

  • FG should pay my 25 years pension

    SIR: The civil servant is at it again in their drift. He does great harm in the subterranean and come to the market place wearing the holy but deceptive look. He wears the teeth that is whiter than snow and spit out white saliva but inside him is the venom that is the killer more venomous than the venomous snakes of Mexico. This time the Federal Minister of Agriculture and Rural Development and his director of human-resources refused to pay my 25 years of pension since the approval was given to me by the Head of the Civil Service of the Federation by his Letter Ref: No. PNB. 1662 fo 19th July, 2012.

    Gleefully and in a well-merited triumph, I wrote my first letter of demand dated 6th August, 2012, to the Federal Minister of Agriculture and Rural Development, floating on the wings of victory but I soon realized that I was in a utopia. Let me remind or rejuvenate the minds of my readers that I have used the words “triumph” and “victory” because it took me six agonizing years before the Head of Civil Service of the Federation approved my application for pension. I was already a victim of obsession in my thought for litigation by the time I received the approval. Coming from my cognitive powers I indulge in systematic economy of words and energy because they may be in greater use in future. Now is another time! My second letter of demand was dated 20th September, 2012 and the third was 6th March, 2013. None was replied and this dangerous and unethical silence explains to any rational being the type of beings in our state bureaucracy: the civil service: I have been mentioning the words “Civil Servant” which can be defined to mean whole but in this sense I do not mean to condemn across board because nature is not monolithic. Like one cannot say that a whole tribe is evil. However, the deaf hears the blind sees that civil servant has facilitated the death by hunger of number less pensioners who were denied their pensions. Let the Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development pay my pension.

    • Oladele Osunbote

    Ibadan, Oyo State

     

  • Pension contributions now N3.4tr,says NPC boss

    The contributory pension scheme introduced in 2004 has generated about N3.4 trillion, the Acting Director General, National Pension Commission (NPC), Mrs Chinelo Anohu-Amazu has said.

    She spoke in Abuja at an interactive workshop for Justices of the Supreme Court, Court of Appeal and Judges of High Courts.

    Mrs Anohu-Amazu said despite the phenomenal growth of the scheme, many workers are yet to fully understand the initiative and its objectives.

    She said the interactive workshop was one of the ways through which the commission was reaching out to stakeholders in its quest to ensure that the scheme achieved its primary goal of providing an enduring, self-sustaining and effective pension system.

    She said NPC found the judiciary as a critical stakeholder in the pension reform and therefore chose to interact with the judges to ensure proper appreciation of the legal and regulatory framework involved in the adjudication of pension cases.

    The NPC boss said the debate was currently on at the National Assembly for the amendment of the Pension Reform Act 2004

    Mrs Anohu-Amazu noted that inputs from the judiciary would go a long way in ensuring that the amendment reflected the people’s desire.

    She stressed the importance of the interactive workshop with the judiciary, saying: “The commission is aware that as it is with all reforms, there are bound to be some concerns and misunderstandings.”

    The Chief Judge of the Federal High Court, Justice Ibrahim Auta, who declared the workshop opened, commended the NPC for the initiative.

    He noted that the responsibly for interpreting the Pension Act falls on judges of the Federal High Court.

    He expressed confidence in the ability of the judges to do justice to cases arising from the implementation of the Pension Act.

  • ‘Private sector ahead on pension fund contributions’

    The private sector is well ahead of the public sector in pension fund contributions, FBN Capital report has revealed.

    The report indicated that the private sector contributes about 60 per cent of the N3.4 trillion pension assets under the management of Pension Fund Administrators (PFAs).

    The research firm said data released by the National Pension Commission (PenCom) showed that as at end of March 2013 (when pension assets were N3 trillion), the private sector contributed N1.8 trillion to the scheme. Also, the public sector’s contribution from ministries, departments and agencies (MDAs) of the federal and some state governments, was N1.2 trillion. This, it said, is a marked change from its composition in 2004 when the Act kicked off.

    FBN Capital said the increase to N3.4 trillion as at the end of May 2013 was largely due to the filing in of 12 states into the contributory pension scheme, although only six states had collected and remitted contributions in compliance with the provisions of the Pension Reform Act (PRA) 2004.

    It said the number of registered contributors has grown to 5.5 million with an average monthly contribution of N30 billion.

    “Given that only seven per cent of the nation’s 80 million workforce has joined the scheme, there exists a huge potential for growth in the coming years,” it said.

  • Pension debt

    Pension debt

    •When will the Federal Govt pay its share of pensions to pensioners?

     

    when will the Federal Government appreciate the need to treat pension matters with dispatch? The question becomes pertinent in view of Lagos State Government’s avid plea to it to pay N13.574billion pension arrears owed pensioners in the ‘Centre of Excellence’. Quite sadly, pension payment has been handled with levity over time, and there seems to be no improvement in sight.

    Mrs. Florence Oguntuase, Lagos State Commissioner for Establishment, Training and Pension corroborated the flippant handling of pension funds by the Federal Government. During her ministry’s ministerial briefing, she unfurled the anguish that Federal Government’s unpaid share of the total pension benefits is causing pensioners in the state. Her passionate plea: “We are appealing to the Federal Government to settle the verified pension indebtedness to the tune of N1, 107,267,537 it owes retired workers of the state government and the N12, 266,652,137 of the workers in the local government.’’ She continued: “The state government, through the Civil Service Pension Office has forwarded applications for the arrears to the Federal Government and we hope they will pay the benefits before the pensioners pass on.”

    Is it right for the Federal Government to foot drag over payment of its pension dues to a state, even when such state has fulfilled its own part of the obligation? Lagos State government paid N18, 031,148,931, its own share of pension benefits to 3,384 retired workers in the state. We are hoping that the Federal Government will not wait until the pensioners pass on before it pays its own counterpart pension for retirees in the state. The Federal Government should stop playing politics with the lives of pensioners, not only in Lagos, but in other states, given the avalanche of arrears it currently owes.

    It has acquired notoriety for abandoning pensioners after years of meritorious service to fatherland. About 98 per cent of federal pensioners are reportedly owed three months pensions. Even retired military personnel across the nation are also reportedly being owed about seven months pensions. Some pensioners that were either underpaid or totally denied their pensions since last November recently took to the streets of Abuja to protest undue interference by Office of the Head of Service. The task of pension affairs was initially taken away from the office of the Head of Service after subjecting pensioners to hardship when the Pension Reform Task Force was established in 2010. The duty reverted to it after the Maina alleged scam in the Pension Reform Task Force Office was unravelled. The entire scenario looks like a vicious cycle.

    Something has to be done to eradicate the suffering of pensioners in the country. For instance, the Lagos State government has commendably established a Pensioner Welfare Office (PWO) to take care of its 14,934 pensioners, apart from promptly paying its own share of the pension dues. There must have been several other states across the nation that have contributed their portion of the bargain but could not access the share of the Federal Government. We wonder the scandalous sum that would by now be owed states! It could not have been ideal for Lagos to request for what belongs to it before such money can be paid. This should not be so if the lives of pensioners mean anything to the Federal Government.

    We therefore call on it not to frustrate governments that are willing and responsive to pensioners’ plight in the country. More importantly, this administration is henceforth called upon to show sufficient sensitivity to the plight of not only pensioners but other Nigerians that it is statutorily obligated to.

  • Oyo pension fraud: Court fixes date for ruling on application

    The Oyo State Magistrate’s Court hearing the N1.6 billion pension fraud in the State Pension Board yesterday fixed June 20 for ruling on an application by the prosecution counsel to withdraw the charges.

    Magistrate Kehinde Durosaro-Tijani adjourned till June 20 after counsel to both parties argued on the Nolle Prosequi seeking withdrawal of the case for further investigation.

    Prosecution counsel Ademola Ojekunle, who stood in for the State Attorney-General (AG), said the state wishes to further probe the alleged fraud so that justice would be done.

    Defence counsel Bolaji Agoro said the AG is empowered to withdraw the case, but it must follow due process.

    He said the prosecution could apply to a higher court and his clients could be re-arrested if the application was allowed.

  • N2.94tr pension fund cash in danger, says Senate

    N2.94tr pension fund cash in danger, says Senate

    Senate President David Mark yesterday lamented that about N2.94trillion that has accrued to the pension fund was not yielding any direct benefit to the nation’s economy due to poor management.

    The followed the second reading of a bill to Repeal the Pensions Reform Act 2004 and enact the Pension Reform Act 2013 in the Senate in Abuja.

    In the proposed law, employees contribution will be reviewed upwards.

    The Federal Government’s and the Federal Capital Territory’s contribution would be charged on the Consolidated Revenue Fund (CRF) of the Federation and that of the FCT respectively.

    Mark noted that the present administration of the nation’s pension fund, was superintended over by people without the requisite experiences.

    He said, “I think the problem we have is that we have all sorts of rookies, people who have no idea about managing funds, let alone very huge pensions fund, going to manage our pension fund; and I think it is a very specialised area where you cannot just wake up tomorrow morning and be appointed to manage the pension fund, you will mismanage it.

    “That is what I suspect has happened. The national budget is N4.9trillion; and we have money in the pension fund up to N2.9trillion; so you can imagine the amount of money at the disposal of few individuals who are not properly supervised, who had no training in the management, and who dipped their hands into it as and when they feel like.

    “I think the essence of this reform is to make sure that people who are properly trained are put in charge of the pension fund and properly managed. There is hardly any pensioner in this country who is not going through hell.

    “He makes all his contributions, when it is time for him to receive his pensions, then they don’t recognise him anymore. When he was paying the contributions he is a very lovely boy or girl, he is a welcome person, everybody is petting him until he retires and when he should now enjoy his pension, then the nation forgets him.”

    Mark also insisted that in withdrawing funds from the consolidated revenue fund of the federation and the inclusion of states would require an amendment of the Constitution, since the National Assembly don’t make laws for the states.

    He stated that the said that the issue of whether employees should pay more should be left to experts in economic matters and could be addressed at the public hearing.

    In his lead debate, Leader of the Senate, Victor Ndoma-Egba (SAN), said there were inadequacies in the extant law such as non-remittances of pension contributions to the pension fund administrators by ministries, departments and agencies; delayed payment and sometimes non-payment of gratuities and pensions to retirees; under payment of retirement benefits, withdrawal of some security agencies from the scheme.

    According to him other challenges include, “Corruption, misappropriation and outright embezzlement of pension funds. Even the Pension Reform Task Team set up to bring some sanity to the system and ensure that pensioners received their pensions as and when due, rather worsened their plight and ended up with confounding sleaze, corruption, degeneracy and stealing so much that the ‘Team’ has become a euphemism for kleptomania.”

    Ndoma-Egba said the new law would cover employees of the public service of the federation, the Federal Capital Territory, states, local governments and private sector organisations with as little as three employees or less.

    “Such funds can be channeled into financing infrastructural projects and creating employment opportunities. As at September 2012, the estimated accumulated pension funds stood at about N2.94trillion.

    “One can only imagine the impact of such funds in the economy if channeled properly. Therefore, everything necessary should be done to strengthen and sustain the contributory pension scheme.”

    The bill which was read for the second time was committed to the Senate Committee on Establishment and Public Service for further legislative work.

  • Retired soldiers protest unpaid pension in Ibadan, Abeokuta

    •’We live like destitute’

    Members of the Armed Forces Pensioners’ Pressure Group of Nigeria yesterday protested the non-payment of their pension in Ibadan, the Oyo State capital.

    About 80 Army pensioners gathered at the State Secretariat, Agodi, demanding the urgent payment of their pension arrears.

    The group’s Southsouth Chairman, Mr. Gabriel Oaikhena, accused the President Goodluck Jonathan-led Federal Government of being insensitive to their plight.

    Oaikhena said: “Over 500,000 soldiers died during the civil war and their families were not compensated. Those of us who are fortunate to be alive are living like destitute. Enough is enough. Do not forget what happened in the Animal Kingdom – the characters eventually protested.

    “The Federal Government has pushed us to the wall. President Goodluck Jonathan is making us hungry. We are fed up. Let the government kill us, if they can. We shall link up with the international community and tell the world how the Federal Government is treating us.

    “We do not want to pick up arms because we fought for the unity of this country and cannot carry arms against the country we fought for. During former United States (US) President Bill Clinton’s visit to Nigeria, he gave some money to war veterans. Where is the money?

    “Nigerian Military Pensioners cannot pay house rent; they cannot eat or pay their hospital bills. The 53 per cent pension increase should be implemented with effect from July 2010.”

    Military pensioners in Ogun State also protested the nonpayment of their pension arrears.

    They marched to the Governor’s Office in Abeokuta, the state capital, in their hundreds.

    The pensioners urged Governor Ibikunle Amosun to prevail on Jonathan to pay their pension arrears.

    They accused the Federal Government of neglecting them.

    Their spokesman, Sgt. Samuel Awosanya (rtd), said since 2009 when the Federal Government approved a 53 per cent pension increase, it has not been implemented.

    He said with the present economic realities, what they are paid cannot sustain them.

    Awosanya said: “Most of us can no longer meet up with our responsibilities to our families. We live in hunger and most of our children are out of school because we cannot pay their fees. Our members are dying on a daily basis because they cannot afford hospital bills.

    “This is why we are calling on you as a listening governor to help us take our case to the Federal Government. We have suffered enough for the country.”

    They hailed the governor’s “rebuilding mission”, which they said is being felt across the state.

    The Secretary to the State Government, Mr. Taiwo Adeoluwa, who represented the governor, said: “Although what you have come for is a Federal Government matter, I assure you on behalf of Mr. Governor that your case would be presented to the appropriate quarters. For us in Ogun State, whatever affects you affects us because you are our people.”

  • Court discharges 40 over ‘N12b pension scam’

    Court discharges 40 over ‘N12b pension scam’

     •EFCC arrests accused

    FORMER Director of Pension Administration in the office of the Head of Service of the Federation, Teidi Shuaibu and 39 others jointly standing trial for allegedly siphoning N12 billion federal civil servants’ pension funds were yesterday discharged by the Federal High Court, Abuja.

    Teidi, and others were also standing trial for the missing funds.

    In a ruling, Justice Adamu Bello said the court’s action was at the instance of the prosecution who prayed for separate trial of the suspects.

    He said the prosecution had formally withdrawn the old charges against the accused to create room for the filing of fresh ones.

    “This is the only workable option and in the light of the above, the case file will be re-assigned by the authority of the Federal High Court.

    “The 40 accused are hereby discharged and are no more before this court,’’ he said.

    At the resumed hearing, Chief Godwin Obla, the prosecuting counsel, announced that his client gave him an instruction to break up the accused for separate trial.

    “My client has instructed me to withdraw an amended charge dated July 26, 2011 comprising 40 accused persons, to give room for separate trial and good case management.

    “We have filed seven sets of charges pursuant to this instruction and will be applying for permission to substitute the earlier charges with the one filed on March 14.

    “The application is brought pursuant to Sections 155 and 168 of the Criminal Procedure Act (CPA).

    “My Lord, this is to reflect the extent of the alleged complicity and participation of the related parties,’’ Obla said.

    Mr Sunday Ameh (SAN) led other defendant counsel in the matter to oppose the application.

    They said that the move would erode the progress so far made in the case.

    According to them, the former charges should be left to stand as each accused person understands the allegation against him or her.

    The accused were first arraigned on March 24, 2011, for allegedly defrauding the pension department, Office of the Head of Service of the Federation, of N12 billion pension funds.

    They were arraigned on a 134-count charge.

    Meanwhile, NAN reports that at the close of the proceeding, operatives of the EFCC re-arrested the suspects and took them away.

  • ‘Pension funds should bridge growth gap’

    ‘Pension funds should bridge growth gap’

    Experts believe that there are many uses to which pension funds should be put if well managed. One of them, Mr Adebayo Jimoh, the Group Managing Director/Chief Executive Officer, Odu’a Investment Limited, in this interview with BISI OLADELE, says the cash can be given to the money and capital markets to enhance economic development.

     

    Odu’a Investment Limited is a major player in the economy and also a member of Association of Developing Finance Institutions in Africa, an offshoot of African Development Bank (ADB), whose business is development financing? Is the group funded by the government or the private sector?

    Development financing is purely the business of the government. It is the business of the government because it needs to provide an enabling environment and resources that are attractive. By the word attraction I mean finances that have long gestation period because most issues of development are not short-term. And if they are not short-term, the returns on them are also not short-term. They are long-term projects that touch on the life of every sector of the economy, essentially the rural sector. But it has to be funds that have attractive interest and it has to be single-digit interest with handsome moratoria period that could create breathing space for the investors. It should not be a choking fund. Neither should it be a risk-free fund; it should be in-between a choking fund and a risk-free fund. The aspect of development finance requires a huge fund which the Federal Government provides. lf you look at the African Development Bank, it has a charter that compels every member-nation to provide funds in a pool so that the development bank now identifies critical areas of intervention that would have long lasting effects and benefits for a greater majority of people within the sub region.

    What other sources of financing do governments in African countries have? Are we exploring enough of these funds, particularly in Nigeria?

    Essentially, apart from the internally generated funds coming from the resources of government, bonds that government raises, hedge funds that industrialists and people that want to invest put into a system like a basket, there are also the special development funds of some continents, such as the European Development Funds and the American Development Funds. They are special funds meant for specific interventions like afforestation, HIV/AIDS, funds for educational development, skill development, funds for intervention in areas like polio, funds for development in floods and natural disasters. All these funds are available through some specific international agencies but there are checklists; there are some processes and conditions, specific requirements.

    The most important one is the counterpart funding. Although European funds come free, you must be able to provide your own counterpart fund to ameliorate what the overseas funds will provide which will be able to accomplish the task.There is no half-measure in development finance fund. If the project, for instance, is N100 billion, the international agency, say from the China Investment Bank, wants to give an aid to Nigeria for construction of a bridge and the cost of that fund is N100 billion, they will provide N70 billion and the Federal Government must show the capacity to provide that counterpart fund. When they start, they must accomplish it. But we, most times, make mistakes because these funds do not necessarily come out in cash as liquidity. Most of them come as materials, equipment, resources, people, infrastructure and even consultancy. So, a development fund is a conglomeration of several input and most times the benefit are not necessarily for the receiving country. The benefit could be for the donor country, especially in the areas of food aid because they try as much as possible to find ways of exporting to support their home grown institutions. For instance, if they are farmers and they have excess harvest, they will say they want to give you aid and you will start clapping, but it is not necessarily free. There is no free lunch anywhere.

    Are there funds like these which are home-grown in Nigeria?

    Yes. Our pension funds serve as a good example. But, unfortunately, it is being abused. These are supposed to be funds that are to bridge development gaps. If our pension funds go into the capital market rather than being kept in stagnant banks and are growing wings to fly as we are seeing, what do you think will happen to our capital market if N30 billion comes into the capital market? There will be serious activity. If these funds are made available to the lending institutions, the simple economic principle of demand and supply will apply. There will be more funds going into the economy than even the demand, and what will happen to the interest rate? It will come down. The real sector will have access to these funds. People will buy into the bonds that our states are taking, and if our liquidity improves and Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) is able to monitor that, it will help our economy than going to take loans in hard currency at very lower rate but when you bring the money into this country they will give them out at higher interest rates. So, there are funds in this country, the pension funds, the stock market funds which are supposed to be used for providing these interventions for our activities back home and that will at least bridge the gap on the foreign loans that we get.

    How would you describe the state of development financing in Nigeria compared with other African countries?

    I would say that there are two institutions that have done very well in Nigeria over the past three years. The first one is the Bank of Industry (BoI). It has been able to identify some specific sectors that require interventions and I know that it is able to support some small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in the textile industry, in the arts and craft, some SMEs in the power sector. I also know about the Bank of Agriculture (BoA). These banks have done well in providing funds at single-digit interest for investors in that sector. Looking at it from that angle, those development finance institutions have performed well and I commend their management. Beneficiaries are accessing these funds and they are also paying back because these funds are being better managed unlike before when people saw them as national cakes and never repaid. They also provide them with support, including extension information services and follow-up to ensure that the funds taken are applied into what they are supposed to use them for. They even offer input and not just necessarily cash. I will say that the critical ones among our development finance institutions have done very well.

    Did any subsidiaries of Odu’a Investment access such funds?

    Yes. We are able to access the funds for graduates of our farmers’ academy where we were able to secure loans for our graduating students in agriculture through the Bank of Industry.They have been able to fulfill their obligations. Default rate is minimal.

    How well are the graduates of Odu’a Academy applying these loans?

    They are doing well. We have graduated over 500 farmers from our academy in Ede, Osun State and they have been able to access this fund through the Quick Intervention Fund of the Osun State Government. Also in Awe, I can conveniently tell you that the first two sets of graduates have been able to access the funds through their cooperatives.

    How about patronising the private sector, particularly in developing infrastructure in Nigeria?

    No government can do it alone. Actually, what I mean by government’s major task of providing funds for financial institutions to use is that the institutions will engage the private sector to utilise the funds. The private sector cannot provide the development funds because they want to make profit. The policy of Public-Private Partnership (PPP) is great and that is what can be used to develop this country. However, what we have noticed in this country is inconsistency in policy for most of these infrastructural development programs. There is a need to have a standard rule of law guiding the operations the government will have with the private sector so that it can become more encouraging for Foreign Direct Investment to come in and support that. But if they know that there are no standard policies whereby another government comes in and proposes another condition to reverse the policy, then it cannot work.

    What about business financing, particularly in the real sector where Odu’a Investments Limited has some subsidiaries? In what ways do you think businesses in Nigeria can access better funds to help them run more profitably?

    To access funds by business enterprises in this country, there is a need for all businesses to do the NEEDS analysis before they can identify what they need the fund for and will be able to match the resources that they will take with the actual output in terms of what they will be able to produce with those funds so that there will not be an hitch whereby loans are taken and can hardly be repaid. There is a need to gather data, have information along with a strong business plan. Jumping out to source for funds is not desirable. People usually say they are travelling abroad to look for investors or funds, but they need to first get information as to the opportunities available in Nigeria. What are they going to use the fund for? Most times they lack this information or some of the business plans that are prepared are just updated without really re-visiting. So, I am saying that it is not just about the need to source for funds that is important, but what you are going to do with this fund and to make for sustainability of the operations of the company. It is also important for the company to prepare a good bankable document that will show that what I am investing this fund on would provide optimal returns on my investment. Without that, most institutions go out for funds and before you know it, they run into serious problems and that is what has led to AMCON to have taken over several companies, including some companies that you don’t think should be in the basket of AMCOM. It is a misnomer, but I am honestly advising investors to check their data properly before they jump into loans or funds that are available in the market for investment. The bank manager will always smile when they want to give you these loans, but if you refuse to pay then that becomes a problem.

    With the high interest rate on bank loans, how will you describe the future of this business and business financing in Nigeria?

    If the high rate regime continues and the inflation rate is said to be coming down, it does not tally. It creates a bleak future for industry because the industry will not be able to get into meaningful activities that would enable them to make profit, to have returns and pay back these loans. There will be a limit to which you can increase your prices if the interest rates are low and the money supplied into the economy is also being highly regulated, whereas the interest rate in banks are still high, so there is a mismatch. So, it’s a bleak future for industry if the interest rate continues this way, there is no way by which they can cope. Coupled with the fact that the cost of doing business is rising, in terms of power, security, water, people, and even normal communication. All these fixed cost are very high. My appeal is for the banks to find a way of at least, bringing down interest rate and the CBN through its monetary policy regime, can do this. The answer is to look at ways of meaningfully utilising our pension fund in a proper manner than being stolen and taken outside this country to other countries. Those countries are now benefiting from it than us. There are some countries whereby their banks will even beg people to come and take loans at zero per cent rate because they are awash with cash.

    But why don’t we have such banks in Nigeria?

    We do not have such banks in Nigeria because the people are afraid to put money here. There are controls, checking, monitoring processes of deposits and the supply into the economy is still very low, and there is huge demand because our infrastructural needs are still many. We do not have institutions to check many things here. We do what I call fire-fighting. We are yet to build institutions that will regulate, monitor and create activities for industry, for the people, society and we will continue to move round in circles.

    This conglomerate has shifted focus to real estate in the last few years. Why?

    I will just say it is a paradigm shift from what we used to do because we just shifted from just trading in the capital market and we saw that the capital market was going to have problems and we needed to identify a good sector because we have the advantage after a strong SWOT analysis of the strength, weaknesses and opportunities of Odu’a. We have advantage to go into real estate investment because we have good locations and we also have the wherewithal to partner with a lot of other people, because most of our associate companies, our subsidiaries, are all in the building sector of the industry. They include WAPCO/Lafarge is in cement, Nigerite is in roofing, Askar is in paint; Nigerian Wire and Cable. We are working in synergy with these institutions that are still very strong. Again, there is huge demand for what I call gated estates in this country. There is more demand for shopping malls because our people are becoming more enlightened, coupled with the fact that the five Odu’a owner-states have started urban renewal projects, and all what Odu’a can do is to support the urban renewal projects by also building to support the people that are coming out to look for opportunities into these new areas of real estate buildings.

    Your administration has built massive properties. Can you share the value of the real estate portfolio of the conglomerate?

    The value of our real estate portfolio as at the last time evaluation was done about two years ago was close to N76 billion. We have been doing some investments since last year. I think that is a very strong level in our real estate development which I believe can even grow better by the time we do others, because we still have a lot of real estate redevelopments to do in some strategic locations. By the time we finish with the Heritage Mall, we are thinking on moving into those locations and the five states. And I can tell you that Abeokuta is our next port of call where we are also trying to replicate a shopping mall like the Shoprite there.

    Very soon, you will be inaugurating the Heritage Mall, which is believed to be the largest shopping mall in the Southwest. What informed your choice of Ibadan as the location? Why not Lagos?

    What informed our choice of Ibadan is basically the fact that Ibadan is a very strong growing economy in terms of people, in terms of opportunities and in terms of the historical nature of it, being a regional capital of Southwest Nigeria, and if Lagos already has three malls, of course, based on our research and business plans, the next port of call is Ibadan.

    As a major player in the real estate business, what are the challenges facing that sector?

    The major challenge facing the sector is the cost profile. You will recall that early last year, the Federal Government was very worried with the high cost of input for building, especially cement and the government had an intervention by calling the manufacturers of cement and there came the issue of undercutting and underpricing between some of the manufacturers. But I will say to you that cement is still better, but there are other aspects, such as the metal, iron rods and the steel. That leads me to the need to call on the Federal Government to revisit the steel industry. The steel industry has to come back because close to 80 per cent of our steel and iron rods materials are still imported, whereas we have the resources, just like we have the resources for manufacturing cement, that was why the Federal Government was able to control the price of cement because close to 90 per cent of our demands are been manufactured locally. If they are able to do that for the Ajaokuta Steel Industry, Delta Steel, they should go back to the drawing board and revisit our steel industry. It will assist in bringing down the prices of most of our building inputs. A lot of our aluminum profiles are imported from China while we have the aluminum smelting industry in Akwa Ibom State. There is a need for the Federal Government to get that place fully privatised and all our steel industries too, so that they will start operating perfectly well. The government should venture into afforestation and start producing woods that will be used in buildings. The greatest challenge is cost of materials.

    How have you been able to raise the profile of this conglomerate since you became the GMD about seven years ago?

    The first thing I think we have succeeded in doing is to raise the morale of our people. We have been able to improve the level of capacity of our staff. Most of our staff are now well-groomed in addressing issues of investment, infrastructural growth, capacity building and issues in industry development. We are also providing assistance for our states in terms of training. As we speak, I can say we have provided several trainings to enhance the capacity of our people and by extension, those people we have the opportunity to empower. Secondly is the environment. I think it is a thing of joy that the greatest legacy of the Yorubas (Cocoa House) that was dead for over 18 years is the pride of everybody including some states, as they have Cocoa House as part of their logo. In terms of reaching out to our states, we are building shopping centres in some states. In Osun State as we speak, we are building a big shopping mall called Aje International Market in Osogbo, The first phase comprises 600 shops and it is almost ready and will be inaugurated in April. We are going to do the same in Ondo State. It will comprise 3,000 shops but we are doing them in phases. We have built our relationship with the youths, scholarship schemes for graduates, undergraduates, nurses, and empowerment schemes for the farmers’ academy because the youths are the future and they should not be idle. Another program which is coming up is just an icing of the cake for us to always remember our great heroes in the past, is a museum which is completed now and Prof Wole Soyinka has agreed to commission it and we are going to do a lot more. What we have been able to put in Odu’a now is a standard you can only grow.

     

  • PENCOM uncovers multiple registration by pension contributors

    PENCOM uncovers multiple registration by pension contributors

    The National Pension Commission (PENCOM) says it  uncovered some multiple registration of Retirement Savings Accounts (RSA) by some pension contributors.

    This is contained in a statement by its Corporate Affairs Manager, Mr Emeka Obiora, in Lagos on Saturday.

    It stated that the RSAs were opened with different Pension Fund Administrators (PFAs).

    According to the statement, in the course of planning for the new transfer windows, we discovered a single contributor with six RSAs in six PFAs, and we are sorting it out.

    “This development is wrong and in such situations the first PFA of choice is picked for the contributor.

    “This development is what is delaying the various transfer windows the commission is planning for contributors.

    “The transfer windows will provide the contributor different options to choose from, on how he wants his contributions to be invested and how to collect his money as a retiree,” it said.

    PENCOM said that it would not roll out the transfer windows without clearing the data as it would complicate issues.

    “At the heart of the transfer windows were biometrics and PENCOM will not have that in place with such problems,” it stated.

    It advised contributors that are having problems with their various PFAs to inform the commission about it instead of going to another PFA.

    The commission said it had dedicated a whole department to make the transfer windows possible.

    It added that work was ongoing and as soon as the data were cleaned up, the guidelines for the transfer windows would be issued.

    PENCOM said that the Risked Based Supervision (RBS) adopted did not give room for any contributor or PFA to engage in shady business.