Tag: Peoples Democratic Party (PDP)

  • PDP Chairmanship: I can’t move without Obasanjo’s advice – Daniel

    PDP Chairmanship: I can’t move without Obasanjo’s advice – Daniel

    … Seeks Baba’s blessing

     

    Former Governor Gbenga Daniel on Friday visited ex – President Olusegun Obasanjo at his Presidential Hilltop Estate, Abeokuta, Ogun state, to consult and solicit support ahead of his planned declaration of intention to run for the Office of the National Chairman of the People’s Democratic Party (PDP).

    Daniel, who governed Ogun State for eight years on the platform of PDP, is expected to formally declare his intention for the PDP chairmanship position in Abuja next Wednesday.

    The ex – Governor who had since reconciled with Obasanjo after the duo fell apart in the build up to the 2011 governorship election in the state, noted that given the status of Obasanjo as a foundation member of PDP, it was necessary that he seeks his input before proceeding with the ambition to lead the party at the National level.

    Other PDP bigwigs spoiling to also lead the once touted as the largest political party in Africa, are chief Bode George and the Chairman of Daar Communications, Chief Raymond Dokpesi.

    Daniel  and his entourage comprising  members of the Ogun State Caretaker Committee of the party, former State Chairman of PDP, Elder Joju Fadairo, former House of Representatives member, Hon. Kayode Amusan, former minister, Alh. Sarafa Ishola and Director of Mobilization and Organization, Ogun PDP, Deji Kalejaiye among others, who arrived Obasanjo’s home around 10am, entered a closed door meeting with him after about an hour long – waiting.

    Others in the entourage are Chief (Mrs) Iyabo Apampa and  former Deputy Governor in the state, Alhaja  Salimot Badru.

    And when they emerged later, Daniel told journalists that he came to “consult with Baba Obasanjo and seeks his advice” regarding his ambition to run for the office of the National Chairman of PDP, adding that he can’t make any  move in that direction without the ex – President’s input.

    “I’m contesting for the PDP chairmanship position. I’m consulting and Baba is one of the foundation members of the party and we can’t move without him,” Daniel said.

    He said PDP is now united and being rejuvenated to make it a party to beat both in Ogun State and at the centre.

    “We have been united. You can see all of us are here. We have realised that united we stand and divided we fall. There are no many problems or many challenges. What you see is just called internal democracy.

    “And to summarize it, we just want to return the party to the people and once that is done, I think the people will be in control, he added.

    Also, the Caretaker Committee Chairman of PDP for the state, Mr. Tunde Odunye, told journalists aside seeking Obasanjo’s support, they also confessed their “transgressions” to him and got his “forgiveness” as a father would forgive erring children.

    However, it should be recalled that Obasanjo had in the build up to the 2015 general elections, publicly tore his PDP membership card before Television Camera and announced his quitting of partisan politics to become an elder statesman and father of all of Nigerians.

     

  • PDP criticizes FG’s $5.5bn loan bid

    PDP criticizes FG’s $5.5bn loan bid

    The Peoples Democratic Party ( PDP ) has expressed concern over the plan by the Federal government to obtain 5.5 billion dollars foreign loan.

    The party in a statement issued on Wednesday in Abuja by National Publicity Secretary of its National Caretaker Committee, Mr Dayo Adeyeye, said the proposed borrowing was needless.

    President Muhammadu Buhari had on Tuesday written to the National Assembly requesting the approval of the loan.

    PDP said that the loan if approved by the National Assembly, would plunge Nigeria into further debt, and consciously mortgage the future of the unborn generations of the country.

    It added that it was an attempt to push the nation into more debt that would affect the future negatively.

    It noted that as a party that governed Nigeria “meritoriously for 16 years and handed over a buoyant economy to the APC in 2015’’, it was worried about the development.

    “We are dismayed at the rate at which the APC government is plunging the nation into debt through local and foreign borrowing.

    “The figure released recently by the Debt Management Office ( DMO ) stating that the nation under the administration of the APC government in the last two years has borrowed N7.51 trillion is mind-boggling.

    “As major stakeholders in the Nigerian project, we are worried,” it said.

    The party urged the National Assembly to stop “this latest demand for foreign loan”.

    NAN

  • Breaking: Ali, Makarfi differ on zoning in PDP 

    Breaking: Ali, Makarfi differ on zoning in PDP 

    …Southwest should produce chairman, says Ali

    Prominent leaders of the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) from the three geopolitical zones in the North Tuesday urged adherence to the zoning arrangement agreed upon for the party’s national convention and 2019 general elections.

    Among others, the party has zoned its chairmanship slot to the South and the presidential ticket reserved for aspirants from the North.

    The party leaders, at an enlarged consultative meeting in Abuja on Tuesday, appealed to aspirants to various elective positions not to violate the zoning arrangement, saying the party paid dearly for such violations in the 2015 presidential election.

    But there was disagreement.

    While a former National Chairman Dr. Ahmadu Ali argued in favour of electing the next chairman from the Southwest geopolitical zone, Caretaker Chairman Ahmed Makarfi said the position was zoned to the South and that micro zoning is not binding.

    Ali said: “It’s either we choose our next national chairman from the Southwest or we forget about PDP”, adding that the zone had yet to occupy the chairmanship position since the formation of the party in 1998.

    “We must be ready to ensure that at the convention, the main issue, which is the national chairmanship of the party, is well handled. If we don’t vote the South-West, we can as well forget the PDP.”

    Ali maintained that the way forward for the PDP is to remain united and warned against unauthorised divisive meetings among certain members for selfish reasons.

    Makarfi restated the commitment of the party to respect the various zoning arrangements, adding however that those bent on going against the zonin arrangement should allowed to please themselves.

    Makarfi said: “The Port Harcourt convention decisions remain valid and one of the decisions taken at that convention was zoning.  But microzoning does not have a binding effect.

    “If a position is zoned to the North and you are from the North and you come to buy form, we will sell for you. Don’t forget that people will not get tired of taking the PDP to court”.

    Another former National Chairman Dr. Bello Haliru Mohammed, called for sanctions against members that go against the party’s zoning arrangement.

    Haliru added that going against the party’s zoning arrangement should no longer be tolerated; saying doing so amounted to disobedience and disloyalty that must be addressed by the leadership.

    The ex-party chair called for sanctions against Ekiti State Governor Ayodele Fayose, who declared his intention to run for President, noting that “zoning and rotation are part of the PDP Constitution. We must adhere to them if we are to keep this party alive.

    “There are people who are bent on contesting whether the office is zoned to their place or not. We must discuss with the South, so that anybody who goes against zoning can be punished. We cannot afford to have people come to the convention and make a fool of themselves and ridicule the party”.

    Former Senate President Iyorchia Ayu described the north as one with the required number to decide who becomes the next chairman.

    “We in the North have the number and we will decide who eventually becomes the national chairman from any part of the South. We have done it before and we are going to do it again”, Ayu said.

    A former Minister of Information, Prof Jerry Gana warned against impunity and imposition of candidates to avoid a repeat of past mistakes.

    “I want to appeal to you to give to the party the very best in the positions that have been zoned to us. Let us therefore give to the party, men and women of impeccable integrity.

    “Whatever the Fayoses of this world may be doing, the party has resolved that the presidential candidate will come from one of the three zones in the north”.

    A former Special Duties Minister, Dr. Kabiru Taminu insisted that zoning was one of the principles recognised and entrenched in the party’s constitution.

    Makarfi lauded the sacrifice made by delegates to the meeting.

    Makarfi called for unity among members as the surest way for the PDP to regain power in 2019.

    The chairman announced the decision of the Osun State chapter of the Labour Party to join the PDP as part of the reconciliation efforts.

    Also present at the enlarged meeting were former Governors Ibrahim Idris and Idris Wada (Kogi); ex-Governor Ramalan Yero (Kaduna); Babangida Aliyu (Niger); and Ibrahim Shema (Katsina).

    Others include former Ministers Abba Moro, Adamu Maina Waziri Zainab Maina and Chief Fidelis Tapgun.

    A former Deputy President of the Senate, Ibrahim Mantu, former National Woman Leader, Ina Ciroma and the chairman of the BoT, Senator Walid Jibrin also attended the meeting.

  • Daniel: no room for impunity in PDP

    Daniel: no room for impunity in PDP

    Former Ogun State Governor Gbenga Daniel is a Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) national chairmanship aspirant. He spoke with Group Political Editor EMMANUEL OLADESU on his plans for the party, the challenge of reconciliation and preparations for the December 9 National Convention.

    What are the lessons which your party has learnt from its protracted leadership crisis?

    It is quite clear that the political environment has matured over the years to the extent that people are well informed; they are enlightened. They know their rights. They know their obligations. Hitherto, the environment we had politically was such that all manners of people, caucuses, interests were moderating the direction of politics. There is nothing absolutely wrong in that, provided that such dictations are in line with the aspirations of the people. The responsibility of leadership is to aggregate the opinion of the led and, as it were, put their own experience in place and provide the compass and dictate the direction. But, I think that, over the years, the party, the PDP, has become, if I may put it this way, over-confident. All sorts of mini lords emerged. And they felt that their words were laws, notwithstanding the aspirations of the masses of the people they led. The motto of the PDP is ‘power to the people.’ Democracy is about the people. And when the party at various levels begins to relegate the interests of the mass of the people to the background, it is bound to create a disaster. I think in a nutshell, that has been the experience of the party. But, I believe what is good in all of these is that, quickly, the party has recognized and appreciated the problems and a conscious effort is being made to direct and to reinvent the strategic direction and modus operandis of the party administration.

    How can the party avert a rancorous convention in December at Abuja? What are the factors that will guarantee a hitch-free exercise, which is critical to its survival?

    It is the same thing I am saying. People have spoken about the kind of politics that we must play; what democracy is all about. I am happy that at a time the word grassroots was introduced into our polity. Bottom up. What people are saying is that they are tired of dictation and imposition. If there will be some kinds of dictation, it should be in tandem with the aspirations of the people. We won’t have problem with the convention, if that principle is adhered to. When you have a convention and the right kind of candidates emerge, you will see that the mass of the people will be excited; they will jubilate. But, if people are trying to play games; the usual games; that it must be A or B or C; or those they think will protect their interests, they may not avert crisis. Like I said, I think the totality of what is on ground is that it is going to be a very exciting convention. I am sure democracy will be at play.

    Why do you want to be national chairman of the PDP?

    It is in the framework of politics that the aspirations of our people are the same. It is believed that they are basically economic. And, of course, since the collapse of the Berlin Walls and the emergence of China as the bastion of communism, there has been a convergence in the ideological disposition of major political parties that the economy should now be the focus, about the survival of our people. Some of us who have had opportunities to serve at various levels have also discovered this. But, when you look at the process by which people who go into service emerge, sometimes, it is faulty; I don’t want to say most times. And that affects the quality of people who they have presented to serve. And if you intelligently look at the quality of people who had served in our country, from the First Republic, the kind of personality that occupied the space, even up to the Second Republic, I can use my own state as an example. In the days when a person like Senator Abraham Adesanya was a senator, and the kind of personality that we have today, there is a decline. When you look at it across board, it is the same thing. We are witnessing a decline in the quality of representation and leadership. That is so because it is through the party that this emergence occur. So, if we say we want to write the wrongs and create a better environment, get good people to participate and by extension, improve the quality of leadership, then, we need to organize the party. Because the party is the engine room. If you remember the politics of the Second Republic, for example, the UPN under the late Chief Obafemi Awolowo was very well organised. They had their four cardinal programmes-free education, free medical care, rural integration, gainful employment. It was clear. That was the Bible. It was not complex at all. That was the Bible they gave to their governors. Everybody knew the programmes. On the other hand, if you look at the National Party of Nigeria (NPN), they were also quite clear-the concept of one nation and they believed that the agricultural revolution was the way to go. In moving forward, you could expect what to get from the governors of the NPN and the governors of the Unity Party of Nigeria then. The NPP of Dr. Nnamidi Azikiwe also had its own strategic focus. The party must be the engine room of governance. The party must provide the strategic direction. If it does not get it right, the party will suffer. So, the party must be the monitoring agency of governance, based on the party manifesto and what the party promised the people. My own take, therefore, is that, if we agree that the quality of governance is declining, as we look for good individuals and encourage them, there has to be a vehicle and that is the party. And that is why some of us feel that, having had the opportunity to serve in executive position, we know where the issues are. When I was governor of Ogun State, for instance, we looked at issues. It was like nobody was able to pin the PDP down on programmes. It is a liaze fare environment. You are allowed to do what you want. If the PDP administration wants to run free education, you do it, which is okay. But, if you are not careful, there will be no strategic focus. So, what we had to do when I was at the helm of affairs was that, if we had no control over the party across the federation, in Ogun State, we had to take the party constitution and from there created the five pillars of the PDP. It was the five pillars that we clearly explain the five pillars which was in the constitution of the PDP and that was the strategic focus; the strategic direction which we ran the administration when it lasted. If there is no good party, there can’t be any good governance. If we are all passionate about good governance, we have to take more than a passive interest in the party administration.

    In concrete terms, what are the reforms you intend to carry out, if you become the national chairman of the PDP?

    The very first thing is to return the party to winning ways. And in returning the party to winning ways, the first thing is to create a party that can relate with the aspirations of the people, or put differently, the party must be about the people. Power must be returned to the people. Which means that the era of impunity, which happened in various instances in the last few years, must be relegated to the background. The concept of internal democracy must be practicalised. Everybody must feel a sense of belonging, and not that the party belongs to some cliques or some few people at the various levels. Our party must be the people’s party. There is no doubt that, because of the economic challenges that exist all over, the power of money has become a key factor in the emergence of candidates. But, it is not and it cannot all be about money. Because the sort of things we have experienced is that people continuously, virtually turned the party into a money making business. They see it as a business. For instance, while I was in charge in Ogun State, there was no time when anybody had to pay for ticket as it is experienced these days. It didn’t happen. As a matter of fact, we looked for people that we thought were competent. And if they did not have enough resources, we found ways and means of supporting them. Of course, the elective offices-40 people on the executive and the House of Assembly over a period of eight years, that is 80 people. Some chairmen came on about three occasions; that was 60. Then, we had councillors. The totality of that 300. None of them paid for the ticket and nobody collected money from them. That really is not how to do it. But, what we have these days is: can you pay for the ticket? The extension of that is that it has become a business venture. You don’t have to pay so much money to certain people to get the ticket. Then, you look at the process of recouping your money back. You now have people who go into service, not because they have any passion to serve, but they see it as a business venture. They see it as an investment and they must garner returns from their investment. How can that type of people make any positive change in our country? It is impossible. Part of the reform we think we should be able to do is to reduce the incidence of illicit money collection in the process. And top of that is the fact that in these days and age, many of our people fail to appreciate that when they started playing politics some 15 year ago, at the beginning of this Fourth Republic, which was 1999, and we are now in 2017, it means that children that were born around 1999 now are 16 years olds. So, people who were two, three, four, five years old at that time are now over 20. And they are the people who will vote now. So, it is important that the party should appreciate that there is a passing generation. And the older generation is not as strong as before. There is a preponderance of an explosive youth population, who are in a hurry to decide how they go on with their lives, the kind of environment that they want to live. We have not done enough in appreciating their situation. The level of unemployment is high. Part of what we should do is to begin to act as a party that the young, energetic and fertile youths can relate with. Hitherto, the perception was that it was a party of some old people, who the youths cannot relate with. Part of what some of us are suggesting is the increased participation of younger people in the process. If we are able to do all of these, as we reposition the party, the party should be ready to go places.

    What is the assurance that you will beat other contestants-Chief Bode George, Prof. Tunde Adeniran, Prof. Taoheed Adedoja, Jimi Agbaje-at the convention?

    Everybody you have mentioned, without exception, are very good party people. All of them are people I have deep respect for. All of them I have had cause to interact with. They are all very intelligent people. They are all very patriotic people. They are all very passionate people. Chief Bode George, you know, is our boss. He is our leader and he will remain as our leader and our boss as long as he alive. Jimi Agbaje is my personal friend of 40 years or so. I am not very close to Professor Adeniran, but I know he is a responsible Nigerian. I have met Prof. Taoheed Adedoja; very intelligent kind of person, very hardworking. Our party is lucky to have the array of very committed people, who want to lead the party. I also think all of them in various ways believe that this party have a chance, as I do. That this party remains the largest party. It is still the beacon of democracy; closest to an ideal democracy in our country. We must look at the interest of some of these patriots. From my own perspective, there is none of them that is not qualified. There is going to be a morning after December 9. All of us must sit together when someone might have won the election and talk about how we want to move the party forward. Once we come to that perspective, there should not be unnecessary tension. My own take is that everybody should go out there in a civilized manner, present themselves to the people, the delegates. The delegates will do justice and somebody will be chosen. We should do it in a determined way. We should put everything into it. But, it should not be a do-or-die affair. We should not go to the field to destroy ourselves. As members of the same party, if I am the chairman of the caretaker committee, I will insist that there must be a minimum level that we can go in this process. We as members of the same party must not despise ourselves. I will not turn people into enemy because we want to be chairman. The onus is on the people who will take the decision tom take an intelligent look at the challenges we have today and look for who can be the best. There is no one who will not be able to do one thing or the other. When you have three, four, five, six people, people should be able to sit down and say that, under the circumstances we find ourselves today, which of these personalities can best achieve the objective. The objective is how to win the election in 2019. I have no doubt in my mind that I have what it takes, the required network, the required network, the required connection to do what should be done.

     

  • My followers and I remain in APC – Akala

    My followers and I remain in APC – Akala

    Former governor of Oyo State, Otunba Christopher Alao-Akala has debunked the rumour that he has made a return to  the People’s Democratic Party ( PDP ) from the ruling, All Progressive Congress ( APC ) in the state.

    Speaking at the weekend in Ogbomosho, venue of an empowerment program by a member of the State Assembly representing Ogbomoso North State Constituency, Hon. Olawumi Oladeji, Akala restated that himself and all his numerous followers are still card carrying and committed members of the ruling party APC.

    The speculations of Akala decamping came after the former governor, upon his return from a London trip, was visited in his New Bodija, Ibadan residence by his former boss, Senator Rashidi Ladoja.

    Akala had reportedly held a political meeting with the incumbent governor, Senator Abiola Ajimobi during the London trip and other top political heavy weights in the state.

    Recalled that the caretaker chairman of the PDP had in a renewed bid to lure back former members to the PDP had visited the Bodija residence of Alao-Akala, where he was received by the supporters as the former governor was away outside the country at the time.

    But, the immediate past Oyo state governor who wore a cap with the inscription, ‘APC, Change ‘ enjoined the people not to be deceived by the gimmicks of scheming politicians about his touted return to the opposition party.

    He said, “I’m not in other political party than APC and for the sake of doubt, I’m saying my followers and I are still in APC. Don’t let anybody deceive you.

    “From the onset, Ogbomoso has always aligned with the ruling party at the federal. That is the reason we in Ogbomoso remains in APC with all my followers.”

    When probed on his political aspirations in the 2019 general elections, the former governor said it is too early to talk about that. 

    “We don’t have to talk about 2019 in 2017. We are on course to get our acts together. Everything is in God’s hands and when we get to the bridge, we shall cross it”, he said. 

    Akala therefore expressed his joy over the success of the state honourable member’s gesture of empowering her constituents. He said the honourable member is her political daughter who has been tested and passed noting that she used her personal money to fund the empowerment program because “Constituency allowance was not released to the members of the house.”

    While speaking at the event, Speaker of the state Assembly, Rt. Hon. Michael Adeyemo who was represented by his deputy, Hon. Musa Abdulwasi said the donor of the empowerment materials has the love of Ogbomoso land at heart. 

    Also, Hon. Olusegun Olaleye representing Ibadan North II State Constituency said the gestures of the donor was borne out of her “dynamic, articulate, eloquent, performing love for members of her constituency.”

    Olaleye described the donor as a woman of integrity and lover of women’s folks pointing out that she has sponsored bills on rights of women. 

    The donor, who is chairperson, House Committee on Women Affairs and Community Development thanked the constituents for giving her the opportunity to serve them. 

    She thanked the former governor for his amiable and accommodating leadership saying he has provided a clear- cut agenda that ensured their victory at different stages in the last general elections.

  • ‘Anambra needs change in leadership’

    ‘Anambra needs change in leadership’

    Mr Ikechukwu Anyene, former President of Nigeria Union, South Africa, says Anambra needs a change in leadership to take the state to greater heights.

    He spoke against the backdrop of the governorship election in Anambra which the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) has fixed Nov. 18.

    Anyene told reporters on telephone from Pretoria, South Africa on Friday that the people of the state had the right to choose a leader that would satisfy their yearnings.

    He said that the people should come out on the Election Day and make the choice of candidate to steer the state.

    Anyene said that from analysis, Mr Oseloka Obazee, the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) candidate had potential to move the state forward.

    “As Secretary to the State Government, Obazee assisted in the building of a new Anambra State under the leadership of former governor, Mr Peter Obi.

    “Given his experience as a tested administrator, he will deliver because he has the pedigree.

    “The choice of Chidi Onyemelukwe, as deputy gubernatorial candidate is a good combination that will move the state forward,” Anyene said.

    He urged the candidates to focus on issues and expected quality service to the people.

    “The parties and their candidates should talk less on individuals or character assassination. Anambra is matured enough to have credible leaders.

    “They should focus on issues that will impact positively on the masses.

    “ I also appeal to the people to make the right choice by coming out to vote on the Election Day,” Anyene said.

    NAN

  • PDP loses 200 members in Ogun East to APC

    PDP loses 200 members in Ogun East to APC

    …As Akinlade seeks Ijebu’s support for Yewa governorship agenda

     

    No fewer than 200 members of the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) in Ogun East Senatorial district have defected to the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) in Ogun State.

    The PDP defectors were received in Ijebu – Ode during a meeting of the Ogun East chapter of the APC presided over by the Senatorial chairman, Alhaji Folorunso Elias,  Wednesday.

    Folorunso assured the defectors that they would be accommodated and their interests protected through a level playing field.

    He said the APC remains the hope of the masses, adding that Governor Ibikunle Amosun’s achievements had further endeared many people to the party in the state.

    The meeting also coincided with ex –  House of Representatives member, Abiodun Akinlade, to APC leaders in Ogun East to  officially  declare his  intention to run for the governorship seat in 2019 on the platform of the party.

    Aknlade who hailed from Ogun West (Yewa – Awori) area of the state, urged the Ijebu people to support the quest of the Yewa-Awori to produce the next governor of the state in 2019.

    He pledged to revisit the abandoned agro-cargo airport and other  viable economic projects located in the Ijebu axis of the state if elected as governor.

    “I have come to seek for your support and prayers. The agro-cargo airport, we must do it because it will generate money, create employment and it will also open up Ogun East area.

    “I have knocked on your door, please open up and help me to secure the party ticket and become the candidate for 2019 election. I have the experience and the wherewithal to represent your interest very well,” Akinlade said.

  • Don’t insult Buhari, Umahi advises PDP members

    Don’t insult Buhari, Umahi advises PDP members

    Gov. David Umahi of Ebonyi has advised politicians in the opposition not to insult those in government but to criticise them constructively to enhance development.

    Umahi spoke at a gala-night to celebrate 21 years of the creation of Ebonyi and the 57th Independence anniversary of Nigeria in Abakaliki on Sunday.

    He advised members of his ruling Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) in the state to refrain from insulting the President Muhammadu Buhari-led All Progressives Congress (APC) Federal Government.

    The governor also urged members of APC in Ebonyi to refrain from insulting him and his PDP-led state government.

    .“I always tell my people (PDP) that opposition at the centre is not about insults; I also advise the opposition in our state to tow the same line.

    “Opposition is about constructive criticism, putting the leader in check and reminding him that he has not fulfilled the promises he made.

    “It should not involve lying to the people, deceiving them and practising politics with bitterness and anger.

    “I will ask our grandfathers who are tackling us to do so with wisdom and love because it is a shame that a grandfather would tackle his children,” he said.

    Umahi said that the opposition would not succeed in the state because the state was neat and did not need to be ‘swept.

    “We have been holding the umbrella for an old man who was under the umbrella for eight years and we will take him to the boundaries of Ebonyi to sweep.

    “We are standing on God’s mandate and not shaking because over 10,000 people are praying for us day and night to succeed and take the state to another level, “ he said.

    Umahi commended the president for agreeing that the country needed to be restructured and noted that such stance had established a platform for Nigerians to discuss their agitations.

    “We will now talk, disagree, agree and arrive at decisions that will take the nation to greater heights and achieve the desired unity and development,” he said.

    Mr Augustine Nwankwagu, the Attorney General and Commissioner for Justice in the state, said the party was to celebrate God’s mercies since the state’s creation and the successes of the governor.

    The governor has been heavily criticised for his actions by the opposition, with his predecessor, Chief Martin Elechi, who decamped from PDP to APC, leading the critics.

    Elechi during a recent interview told newsmen that he did not support Umahi’s emergence as governor and would not support his re-election  for a second term in office.

  • Appeal Court orders DSS to produce Dasuki as witness in Metuh’s trial

    Appeal Court orders DSS to produce Dasuki as witness in Metuh’s trial

    The Court of Appeal in Abuja has ordered the Director General of the Department of State Services (DSS) to produce former National Security Adviser (NSA), Sambo Dasuki, in the trial of ex-spokesman of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Olisa Metuh.

    Dasuki, considered by the appellate court as a relevant and compellable witness in the case, is expected to testify as Metuh’s witness.

    The Court of Appeal also ordered the trial judge, Justice Okon Abang of the Federal High Court to promptly sign a witness summons/subpoena, applied for by Metuh since December 2016, for Dasuki to appear and testify as his witness.

    The court equally ordered that proceedings in the case should immediately resume before the trial judge at the Federal High Court, Abuja.

    The appellate court gave the orders in a unanimous judgment of a three-man panel, delivered on Friday in an appeal filed by Metuh.

    Metuh’s appeal was against the ruling by Justice Abang in March this year, refusing his (Metuh’s) application for among others, an order directing the DSS’ DG to produce Dasuki (who is being held in DSS custody) to testify as his (Metuh’s) witness.

    Metuh is being tried with his company, Destra Investment, before the Federal High Court, Abuja on a seven-count amended charge in which they were alleged to have unlawfully received N400m from Dasuki, while in office.

    Metuh, who is now conducting his defence, had in December 2016 applied for a subpoenaed to be issued on Dasuki, which the trial judge refused to sign.

    He again filed an application, seeking among others, to direct the DSS to produce Dasuki to testify as a defence witness. The trial judge also refused the application on the ground that Dasuki was not a necessary and compellable witness.

    In the lead judgment read by Justice Peter Olabisi Ige, the Court of Appeal resolved the four issues identified for determination in Metuh’s favour.

    The court allowed Metuh’s appeal, set aside Justice Abang’s ruling and held that it was not for the trial judge to decide for the defence which witness is relevant.

    On the first issue, the court held that it was wrong for the trial court to have held that Dasuki, whose name featured prominently in the charge against Metuh and his firm, was not a necessary and compellable witness on who a subpoena could be issued.

    The court said any person was a compellable witness in court proceedings.

    It identified non-compellable witnesses to include those covered by immunity under Section 308 of the Constitution and individuals certified to be of unsound mind, with no useful contribution to the proceedings.

    On the second issue, the court held that, as against the conclusion of the trial judge, the appellant was not required to disclose to the trial court the efforts he made without success, to bring the intended witness to court.

    On the third issue, the appellate court held that the trial judge wrongly applied the provision of Section 241(1) of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act (ACJA).

    It added that the use of the word ‘may’ in the provision did not give the trial judge the power to decide for a party what constitutes a relevant or necessary witness.

    On the fourth issue, the court held that the trial judge was at error to have concluded that the application to call Metuh was intended to delay proceedings.

    The appellate judge further held that the trial judge was wrong to have hinged his refusal of Metuh’s application on the provision of Section 396(4) of the ACJA, when Section 256 of the same law provides allowances on which parties in criminal proceeding could manoeuvre.

    The court also held that there is provision in the ACJA for the recall of witnesses or additional witnesses.

    It added that the finding of the trial judge, to the effect that the application to call Dasuki was a ploy to delay proceedings, violated the right of the appellant to ensure that the conduct of his case as he desires.

    Justice Ige said, in the lead judgement, that “there is no doubt that Col. Dasuki, who was mentioned in counts 1, 2, 3, 4 and 7 of the charge, was an essential witness in the case.”

    He noted that, since the prosecution, which filed the charge, failed to call him, the defendant, who felt he (Dasuki) was necessary to its case, should not be prevented from calling him.

    Other members of the appellate court panel that sat on the appeal are Justices Emmanuel Akomaye Agim and Mohammad Mustapha.

    The trial is expected to resume before Justice Abang on October 23.

    Meanwhile, two appeals by Metuh and his firm are still pending before the Supreme Court.

  • Updated: Court orders DSS to produce Dasuki in Metuh’s trial

    Updated: Court orders DSS to produce Dasuki in Metuh’s trial

    The Court of Appeal in Abuja has ordered the Director General of the Department of State Services (DSS) to produce former National Security Adviser (NSA), Sambo Dasuki in the trial of ex-spokesman of the People’s Democratic Party (PDP), Olisa Metuh.

    Dasuki, considered by the appellate court as a relevant and compellable witness in the case, is expected to testify as Metuh’s witness.

    The Court of Appeal also ordered the trial judge, Justice Okon Abang of the Federal High Court to promptly sign a witness summons/subpoena, applied for by Metuh since December 2016, for Dasuki to appear and testify as his witness.

    The court equally ordered that proceedings in the case should immediately resume before the trial judge at the Federal High Court, Abuja.

    The appellate court gave the orders in a unanimous judgment of a three-man panel, delivered on Friday in an appeal filed by Metuh.

    Metuh’s appeal was against the ruling by Justice Abang in March this year, refusing his (Metuh’s) application for among others, an order directing the DSS’ DG to produce Dasuki (who is being held in DSS custody) to testify as his (Metuh’s) witness.

    Metuh is being tried with his company, Destra Investment, before the Federal High Court, Abuja on a seven-count amended charge in which they were alleged to have unlawfully received N400m from Dasuki, whille in office.

    Metuh, who is now conducting his defence, had in December 2016 applied for a subpoenaed to be issued on Dasuki, which the trial judge refused to sign.

    He again filed an application, seeking among others, to direct the DSS to produce Dasuki to testify as a defence witness. The trial judge also refused the application on the ground that Dasuki was not a necessary and compellable witness.

    In the lead judgment read by Justice Peter Olabisi Ige, the Court of Appeal resolved the four issues identified for determination in Metuh’s favour.

    The court allowed Metuh’s appeal; set aside Justice Abang’s ruling and held that it was not for the trial judge to decide for the defence which witness is relevant.

    On the first issue, the court held that it was wrong for the trial court to have held that Dasuki, whose name featured prominently in the charge against Metuh and his firm, was not a necessary and compellable witness on who a subpoena could be issued.

    The court said any person was a compellable witness in court proceedings.

    It identified non-compellable witnesses to include those covered by immunity under Section 308 of the Constitution and individuals certified to be of unsound mind, with no useful contribution to the proceedings.

    On the second issue, the court held that, as against the conclusion of the trial judge, the appellant was not required to disclose to the trial court the efforts he made without success, to bring the intended witness to court.

    On the third issue, the appellate court held that the trial judge wrongly applied the provision of Section 241(1) of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act (ACJA).

    It added that the use of the word ‘may’ in the provision did not give the trial judge the power to decide for a party what constitutes a relevant or necessary witness.

    On the fourth issue, the court held that the trial judge was at error to have concluded that the application to call Metuh was intended to delay proceedings.

    The appellate judge further held that the trial judge was wrong to have hinged his refusal of Metuh’s application on the provision of Section 396(4) of the ACJA, when Section 256 of the same law provides allowances on which parties in criminal proceeding could manoeuvre.

    The court also held that there is provision in the ACJA for the recall of witnesses or additional witnesses.

    It added that the finding of the trial judge, to the effect that the application to call Dasuki was a ploy to delay proceedings, violated the right of the appellant to ensure that the conduct of his case as he desires.

    Justice Ige said, in the lead judgement, that “there is no doubt that Col. Dasuki, who was mentioned in counts 1, 2, 3, 4 and 7 of the charge, was an essential witness in the case.”

    He noted that, since the prosecution, which filed the charge, failed to call him, the defendant, who felt he (Dasuki) was necessary to its case, should not be prevented from calling him.

    Other members of the appellate court panel that sat on the appeal are Justices Emmanuel Akomaye Agim and Mohammad Mustapha.

    The trial is expected to resume before Justice Abang on October 23.

    Meanwhile, two appeals by Metuh and his firm are still pending before the Supreme Court.

    The first is that filed by Metuh against the decision of the Court of Appeal, which upheld the trial court’s ruling, refusing his no-case submission.

    The second is that filed by Destra against the judgment of the Appeal Court, upholding the ruling by the trial court, that counts one and two of the charge were not strictly about contract, on which the Federal High Court lacked jurisdiction.

    The Supreme Court has not given dates for the hearing of both appeals.