Tag: P&ID

  • UK court dismisses P&ID’s case on cost

    UK court dismisses P&ID’s case on cost

    The UK Supreme Court has unanimously ruled in favour of Nigeria in a long-standing legal dispute with Process & Industrial Developments Limited (P&ID) over £44 million in legal costs.

    The court’s decision, delivered on October 22 by Lord Reed (President), Lord Hodge (Deputy President), Lord Stephens, Lord Richards and Lady Simler, affirms that Nigeria is entitled to recover its legal costs in sterling (GBP) rather than naira (NGN).

    The dispute arose from a contract between P&ID and the Federal Republic of Nigeria for the construction of a gas processing facility in Nigeria.

    P&ID commenced arbitration proceedings against Nigeria, resulting in two awards totalling US$6.6 billion plus interest at seven per cent in 2015 and 2017.

    However, Nigeria successfully challenged the awards under section 68 of the Arbitration Act 1996, citing fraud and public policy violations.

    The UK Supreme Court held that an order for costs “is not intended to compensate for loss” but rather represents a statutory indemnity for expenses incurred in litigation.

    READ ALSO: Quick steps to apply for NELFUND 2025/2026 student loan

    Since Nigeria incurred liability and made payments in sterling, the court ruled that a costs order in sterling was appropriate.

    The court’s decision reaffirms the principle that costs are to be awarded in the currency in which the legal services were billed and paid, unless there are exceptional or abusive circumstances.

    This ruling marks another significant legal victory for Nigeria in the long-running dispute with P&ID, following the country’s landmark success in overturning the US$11 billion arbitration award in 2023.

    The decision also provides clarity on the currency in which costs should be awarded in international arbitration cases.

  • P&ID: Lawyers caution on future contracts

    P&ID: Lawyers caution on future contracts

    The legal team that successfully defended Nigeria in the multi-billion-dollar arbitration case against Process & Industrial Developments (P&ID) Limited has called on the Federal Government to strengthen its approach to contract procurement, especially in relation to high-value and long-term agreements.

    Speaking during the send forth ceremony for Mr. Kofo Salam-Alada, outgoing Director of the Legal Department at the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN), Shaistah Akhtar, Partner at Mishcon de Reya LLP—the firm that represented Nigeria in the case—urged authorities to be more vigilant in contract award processes to avoid pitfalls similar to those encountered in the P&ID matter.

    Akhtar observed that despite Nigeria having an advanced legal infrastructure in areas such as anti-corruption and anti-money laundering, serious lapses occurred during the award of the original P&ID contract.

    She pointed out that the agreement lacked the structural strength expected of a contract with such magnitude and long-term implications.

    “In this case, things did go wrong. Government officials were bribed. The contract was not as robust as it should have been. It was quite a flimsy contract for such a long-running and high-value transaction,” Akhtar told journalists.

    She also disclosed that little to no due diligence was carried out on the contractors involved. “There wasn’t any due diligence carried out on the contractors, who were effectively a two-man band and an offshore company with no assets and no track record,” she said.

    READ ALSO: 11 things Nigerians should note when applying for a five-year Schengen visa

    Referring directly to the P&ID saga, Akhtar recounted how the Shell company sought billions of dollars from Nigeria over a gas supply and processing agreement that was never implemented.

    “This was a case where P&ID, a Shell company, brought a claim of many billions of dollars against the Nigerian government in respect of a gas supply and processing agreement, which never broke ground,” she said. “By the time it got to enforcement, the award was worth around $11 billion. That’s about a third of Nigeria’s foreign reserves, and several times its education, health, and security budgets.”

    Akhtar described the stakes as enormous and said the government acted swiftly to challenge the arbitral award. “We managed to overcome a number of challenges in order to successfully set it aside,” she said.

    Beyond the economic benefits, she described the legal victory as a significant moment in Nigeria’s battle against corruption and a deterrent to potential fraudsters. “This is a practical implementation of the government’s anti-corruption policy. It sends a strong signal to those seeking to exploit government weaknesses.”

    Akhtar also praised the critical role played by Mr. Kofo Salam-Alada in the legal battle, describing him as a linchpin in the collaborative effort involving the Ministry of Justice, the Ministry of Petroleum Resources, and the Central Bank of Nigeria.

    “Kofo was delegated the day-to-day responsibility of dealing with the lawyers. He played an essential role in giving instructions, obtaining information, and ensuring we had the tools needed to pursue the case,” she stated.

    She stated that Mr. Alada’s dedication over more than five years was central to the successful outcome. “He worked extremely hard over a period of five and a half years—well beyond the call of duty—working all hours and engaging with various government agencies and officials to get what was needed to move the case forward,” Akhtar said.

    Her remarks during the event conveyed deep professional respect and appreciation for Alada’s work ethic and commitment.

    “We’ve learned to appreciate Kofo’s qualities as a professional and as an individual. His work on this case has been invaluable. He has been a critical part of the success of this case, which has saved the Nigerian government this enormous liability of $11 billion,” she said.

    Akhtar concluded that the outcome of the case carries enduring value, not only for the government but for all Nigerians. “This is an important result, not just for the government, but for the 200 million people of Nigeria. It’s a great part of the legacy. And we feel very proud to have worked with him. He’s a great representative of the government, a great servant of Nigeria. This outcome will benefit many generations to come.”

    The P&ID case, long viewed as a legal and financial cloud over Nigeria’s economic stability, was effectively neutralised through the efforts of the legal team and the commitment of officials like Mr. Alada.

  • P&ID: Foreign lawyers urge caution in future contracts

    P&ID: Foreign lawyers urge caution in future contracts

    The legal team that successfully defended Nigeria in the multi-billion-dollar arbitration case against Process & Industrial Developments (P&ID) Limited has called on the Federal Government to strengthen its approach to contract procurement, especially in relation to high-value and long-term agreements.

    Speaking during the send forth ceremony for Mr. Kofo Salam-Alada, outgoing Director of the Legal Department at the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN), Shaistah Akhtar, Partner at Mishcon de Reya LLP—the firm that represented Nigeria in the case—urged authorities to be more vigilant in contract award processes to avoid pitfalls similar to those encountered in the P&ID matter.

    Akhtar observed that despite Nigeria having an advanced legal infrastructure in areas such as anti-corruption and anti-money laundering, serious lapses occurred during the award of the original P&ID contract. 

    She pointed out that the agreement lacked the structural strength expected of a contract with such magnitude and long-term implications.

    “In this case, things did go wrong. Government officials were bribed. The contract was not as robust as it should have been. It was quite a flimsy contract for such a long-running and high-value transaction,” Akhtar told journalists.

    She also disclosed that little to no due diligence was carried out on the contractors involved. “There wasn’t any due diligence carried out on the contractors, who were effectively a two-man band and an offshore company with no assets and no track record,” she said.

    Referring directly to the P&ID saga, Akhtar recounted how the shell company sought billions of dollars from Nigeria over a gas supply and processing agreement that was never implemented.

    Read Also: $9.6b P&ID scandal: INTERPOL arrests fleeing Briton in Italy

    “This was a case where P&ID, a shell company, brought a claim of many billions of dollars against the Nigerian government in respect of a gas supply and processing agreement, which never broke ground,” she said. “By the time it got to enforcement, the award was worth around $11 billion. That’s about a third of Nigeria’s foreign reserves, and several times its education, health, and security budgets.”

    Akhtar described the stakes as enormous and said the government acted swiftly to challenge the arbitral award. “We managed to overcome a number of challenges in order to successfully set it aside,” she said.

    Beyond the economic benefits, she described the legal victory as a significant moment in Nigeria’s battle against corruption and a deterrent to potential fraudsters. “This is a practical implementation of the government’s anti-corruption policy. It sends a strong signal to those seeking to exploit government weaknesses.”

    Akhtar also praised the critical role played by Mr. Kofo Salam-Alada in the legal battle, describing him as a linchpin in the collaborative effort involving the Ministry of Justice, the Ministry of Petroleum Resources, and the Central Bank of Nigeria.

    “Kofo was delegated the day-to-day responsibility of dealing with the lawyers. He played an essential role in giving instructions, obtaining information, and ensuring we had the tools needed to pursue the case,” she stated.

    She stated that Mr. Alada’s dedication over more than five years was central to the successful outcome. “He worked extremely hard over a period of five and a half years—well beyond the call of duty—working all hours and engaging with various government agencies and officials to get what was needed to move the case forward,” Akhtar said.

    Her remarks during the event conveyed deep professional respect and appreciation for Alada’s work ethic and commitment.

    “We’ve learned to appreciate Kofo’s qualities as a professional and as an individual. His work on this case has been invaluable. He has been a critical part of the success of this case, which has saved the Nigerian government this enormous liability of $11 billion,” she said.

    Akhtar concluded that the outcome of the case carries enduring value, not only for the government but for all Nigerians. “This is an important result, not just for the government, but for the 200 million people of Nigeria. It’s a great part of the legacy. And we feel very proud to have worked with him. He’s a great representative of the government, a great servant of Nigeria. This outcome will benefit many generations to come.”

    The P&ID case, long viewed as a legal and financial cloud over Nigeria’s economic stability, was effectively neutralized through the efforts of the legal team and the commitment of officials like Mr. Alada. 

  • P&ID loses bid to upturn Court judgement favouring Nigeria

    P&ID loses bid to upturn Court judgement favouring Nigeria

    • AGF hails courts acceptance of Nigeria’s demand for cost

    A move by Process and Industrial Development (P&ID), a company owned by two Cayman Island-based entities, to set aside a previous judgement reversing the company’s $11 billion damages claim against Nigeria has been rejected by an English Court of Appeal.

     A report by Premium Times,  says that Lord Justice Snowden, a justice of the High Court of Justice of England and Wales and the lead judge in the suit, noted that the decision of a British high court on the matter last December stands.

    The verdict was delivered unanimously with other judges such as Lord Justice Snowden and Sir Julian Flaux.

    Read Also: My wife adulterous, claims Super Eagles star in court petition

    P&ID was also challenging the decision of Robin Knowles, the judge who dismissed the damages claim, to deny it permission to appeal the previous judgement.   

    In one voice, the three judges granted P&ID’s prayer for permission to appeal and promptly dismissed it, according to a copy of the Friday ruling, seen by the online media.

     “I would therefore grant P&ID permission to appeal, but would dismiss the appeal,” Mr Snowden said while reading the decision he reached with his two other colleagues.

    Succinctly put, the appeal dismissed by the court was P&ID’s bid to reject the ruling freeing Nigeria from paying the company the damages.

    The court also rejected the prayer of the company, requesting it to set aside a ruling by the lower court regarding the currency in which the payment of the legal costs Nigeria incurred in the case.

    P&ID’s contention was whether Robin Knowles, the judge who asked the company to pay Nigeria £43 million as legal fees and disbursements when the decision was made seven months ago, was in order in declaring that the payment be made in pounds sterling.

    Meanwhile, the Attorney General of the Federation (AGF) and Minister of Justice, Lateef Fagbemi (SAN) has hailed the decision of a United Kingdom (UK) agreeing to Nigeria’s claim of cost after the voiding of the $11billion award got against the country by Irish firm, Process and Industrial Development (P&ID).

    In a statement on Friday by his spokesman, Kamardeen Ogundele, the AGF said he was delighted about the development, which was just communicated to him by Nigeria legal representatives in the UK

    The statement reads: “Today (being the 12° day of July 2024), the United Kingdom Court of Appeal validated Nigeria’s claim for the post-judgment costs to be paid in Pound Sterling (GBP), which P&ID tried to reduce drastically by claiming that Nigeria should only be entitled to recover its costs in naira, which evidently will produce a much lower cost.

    “This was another misconceived and desperate attempt by fraudsters to deprive the Nigerian people of hard-earned public revenue.

    “The Hon. Attorney-General of the Federation, Lateef O. Fagbemi, SAN is delighted at a report just received from our UK solicitors on the latest victory recorded by Nigeria in its fight against corruption and extortion by litigation hawks.

     “Consequent upon our success in defeating the fraudulent USD 11 billion claim by P&ID last year, Nigeria is continuing its efforts to recover its substantial costs from P&ID and its vulture fund backers.

    “As a government, we are very determined to recover these costs and make P&ID and its US funders pay for their scam so as to serve as a deterrence to others of their ilk.

    “We commend the dedication and tenacity of our legal team for this accomplishment. “

  • $11b Judgement: Nigeria wins again, London court denies P&ID appeal

    $11b Judgement: Nigeria wins again, London court denies P&ID appeal

    The Process and Industrial Development (P&ID) has lost its final appeal against Nigeria in an $11 billion arbitration case.

    The P&ID sought to overturn an October judgment by a London High Court that halted the enforcement for damages over a failed gas processing project.

    In October, the High Court ruled that the British Virgin Islands-based company, paid bribes to a Nigerian oil ministry official in connection to the gas contract signed in 2010, and failed to disclose this when it took Nigeria to arbitration over the collapse of the deal.

    Ruling, Judge Robin Knowles rejected P&ID’s argument that the case should be returned for arbitration and affirmed that the damages award should be thrown out completely.

    The Judge, on October 23, ruled in favour of Nigeria in the enforcement of a $11 billion Process & Industrial Developments (P&ID) Limited arbitration award.

    According to the Judge, the award against Nigeria by the company was obtained by fraud. He had found out that P&ID bribed Nigerian officials who participated in  drafting the gas supply and processing agreement in 2010.

    Also discovered by the Judge was that P&ID was illegally in possession of Nigeria’s privileged legal documents during the arbitration hearings.

    The Federal Government had urged the court to set the award aside, saying that some individuals in the case were being tried for money laundering and graft.

    But after listening to the arguments by lawyers to P&ID, which included that the documents found in their possession played no role in its initial victory at the arbitration, the Judge yesterday refused to grant the permission to appeal.

    In January 2010, P&ID, a Virgin Islands-registered company founded by two Irish business partners, signed a Gas Supply and Processing Agreement (GSPA) with Nigeria to develop a processing plant in Calabar, the Cross River State capital but the deal failed in August 2012 and the company sought a $5.96bn compensation from Nigeria with arbitration proceedings against the country at the London Court of International Arbitration.

    Read Also: Tinubu expanding horizon of entrepreneurship in Nigeria – Alake

    In January 2017, the arbitration said Nigeria breached the contract and ordered the country to pay the company $6.6bn with interest starting from May 2013. Before the verdict, the interest fixed at seven percent ($1m daily) had accumulated to over $11bn.

    Subsequently, Nigeria filed an appeal against the enforcement of the award and the court granted the relief sought by the country in September 2020. The Nigerian side argued that there was enough evidence that the contract and the arbitration award were procured by fraud.

    The Nigerian side thereby urged the court to set the award aside, saying that some individuals in the case were being tried for money laundering and graft.

    In his October ruling, the judge not only agreed that the arbitration awards were obtained by fraud but also that the manner that they were procured were contrary to public policy.

  • Lessons from the P&ID Case

    Lessons from the P&ID Case

    • By Jerry Amao

    On Monday, October 23, in a stunning victory for Nigeria, the High Court in London set aside the arbitration award obtained in January 2017 by P&ID, a British Virgin Islands registered company, against Nigeria. 

    The award was originally for about $6.6bn but had increased to about $11bn as of the date of the court judgment because of interest. P&ID had brought the claim against Nigeria before the arbitral tribunal, alleging that Nigeria breached a gas supply and purchase agreement (GSPA) to supply gas to a P&ID project that was to be located in Calabar, Cross River State.

    Nigeria successfully obtained leave of the High Court in London in September 2020 to appeal against the arbitral tribunal award. Hearing on the appeal took place for eight weeks between January and March this year. While Nigeria’s victory has brought enormous relief to the country, it is crucial to understand

    the basis for the judgment of the court and the lessons the country should learn from the case.

    Several allegations of corruption were at the centre of Nigeria’s challenge to the arbitration award.

    Nigeria alleged that P&ID paid bribes to several officials of the Nigerian government involved in the entry into the GSPA between Nigeria and P&ID between 2009 and 2010. Among the officials alleged to have been corrupted by P&ID were the former Minister of Petroleum Resources, Rilwanu Lukman (now late), a former NNPC official, the late Taofiq Tijani and a former Director of Legal Services, Grace Taiga.

    It was also alleged that P&ID paid bribes to the first lead external counsel for Nigeria during the arbitration proceedings, Supo Shasore, SAN and government lawyers that advised on the arbitration, including Kemi Adelore, then Director of Legal Services in the Ministry of Petroleum Resources, and Ikechukwu Oguine, then Coordinator, Legal Services of NNPC, and that these lawyers colluded with P&ID to ‘throw’ the case.

    Another key allegation made by Nigeria was that P&ID told lies to the arbitral tribunal to secure the award. These lies included claims that it had obtained the financing and completed the engineering for the Calabar project when in fact, it had not done either. These lies amounted to perjury and had deceived the tribunal into making the award in P&ID’s favour.

    P&ID denied all the allegations and asserted that Nigeria lost the arbitration proceedings because of incompetence on the part of its officials responsible.

    Allegations of corruption

    The court upheld the allegations made regarding late Mrs. Taiga and found that some payments she received from P&ID were indeed bribes. The payments continued until 2020 when the arbitration was in progress, and the court held that P&ID continued to make payments to Taiga to ensure she did not reveal the earlier payments made to her. Thus, the dealings between P&ID and Mrs Taiga related not just to the entry into the GSPA, but also tainted the arbitration proceedings. 

    Read Also: I was not involved in P&ID case, says Sagay

    This was one of the main grounds on which the arbitration award was set aside.

    The court dismissed Nigeria’s allegations of corruption against the late Lukman for lack of evidence.

    Also, it dismissed the allegations against the lawyers who were involved on Nigeria’s behalf in the arbitration. The court instead found that the lawyers had represented Nigeria honestly and made concerted efforts to resolve the matter in Nigeria’s interest. Concerning Shasore, the court highlighted several steps he took to defend Nigeria. It noted that the people to blame for any failings in Nigeria’s defence were the senior officials of the Nigerian government who took no action on several recommendations made to them by Shasore on how best to defend the case at the arbitral tribunal.

    Perjury

    The court agreed with Nigeria that P&ID had lied to the arbitral tribunal about how much progress it had made in obtaining financing and in performing the engineering for the project. These lies, the court found, assisted P&ID in securing the award.

    A P&ID witness, the late Michael Quinn, had given a witness statement to the arbitral tribunal purporting to set out how the GSPA had been entered into. The statement did not mention the payments made by P&ID to the late Mrs Taiga. The court held that if the arbitral tribunal had been aware of the said payments, its decision would likely have been different. That concealment, in the court’s view, amounted also to perjury. These examples of perjury on P&ID’s part constituted the second major basis for the setting aside of the award.

    Lessons

    One of the major lessons from the case is that the nation must ensure that contracts entered into by government are prepared by competent and experienced legal and other experts. The court was very critical of the GSPA and the obligations that Nigeria assumed under the contract. While setting aside the award, it noted that Nigeria had failed to provide the right resources for entering into such a significant contract.

    Another obvious lesson is that senior government officials entrusted with decision-making power must show a strong sense of responsibility and should be held accountable where they do not. The tribunal identified several instances where key recommendations concerning the arbitration were not acted upon by the officials responsible, including Ministers of Justice and of Petroleum Resources. The court has come to Nigeria’s rescue this time, but it is clear from the judgment that if the heads of the relevant ministries had performed their duties effectively, this case might not have arisen at all.

    • Amao, is a Lagos – based public affairs analyst
  • P&ID Case: Lessons and the path forward

    P&ID Case: Lessons and the path forward

    • By Oluwagbemiga Ogunsote

    On Monday, October 23, a commercial court in the United Kingdom rendered a verdict that significantly altered the course of a protracted and complex legal battle between Nigeria and Process & Industrial Developments (P&ID), a British Virgin Islands-based company. In what can only be seen as a victory for Nigeria, Justice Robin Knowles, presiding over the case, made a ruling that set aside an earlier arbitral award against Nigeria. 

    The earlier award in favour of P&ID was a staggering sum of $6.6 billion, alongside a seven percent interest rate, as damages to be paid by the Federal Government of Nigeria. The implications of this week’s ruling are profound, as it potentially prevented P&ID from seizing foreign assets owned by the nation.

    But just before we act like we are wont to do – pat ourselves on the back and put that past behind us and move on – it is important that we do what rational beings would do. We should as a matter of utmost importance reflect on how we got here in the first place. Perchance, such an exercise will enable us to take away critical learnings that may steer us away from treading such a path in future.

    Let us be realistic…if the arbitration award was not as huge as it was to even pose an existential threat to Nigeria, the last-minute efforts to stall and thwart the payment of the award might never have taken place. 

    In 2010, during the Yar’Adua/Jonathan administration, Nigeria had entered (what on the surface was) a laudable gas supply and processing agreement (GSPA) with P&ID, with the goal of developing a gas processing plant in Cross River State to help cut down gas flaring and increase availability of gas for other national uses such as power generation. 

    Flaws and fraud in the contracting process would eventually be exposed. How a contract with such national ramifications could have been executed in a shabby manner that it was, clearly showed that private pecuniary interests had taken control of the process. It would later come to light that Nigeria’s Ministry of Justice was not even carried along. Sensitive documents that had no business being in the hands of P&ID found their way out of confidential government circles and into P&ID meeting rooms. Even P&ID Nigeria Ltd which was the original corporate entity the government had discussions with ended up being a different corporate entity from P&ID which the government eventually signed the contract with. 

    Due diligence and adherence to laws and processes are often sacrificed for selfish interests…and the P&ID contract was no exception. However, we have no idea the scale of loss Nigeria has suffered due to this in other less celebrated scams.

    Eventually, the GSPA project never came to fruition, and P&ID alleged that Nigeria had breached the terms of the contract. This dispute culminated in a protracted legal battle that was taken to arbitration in 2012, with a senior lawyer Olasupo Shasore (SAN), a former Attorney-General of Lagos State, representing Nigeria’s interests. 

    The ramifications of such an enormous sum leaving Nigeria’s coffers would have been nothing short of an economic catastrophe. Interestingly, Nigeria had a 90-day window in 2017 to appeal the ruling …and didn’t take it until the time lapsed and a summary, no-contest judgment was issued against Nigeria.

    Read Also: Losing P&ID case would have cost Nigeria $15b, says  Buhari

    Consequently, Nigeria, seeking to be allowed to re-enter a dispute of the award, initiated legal proceedings in both the United Kingdom and Nigeria to prove that the project was fraudulent from conception and that even the arbitration process was not spared from corruption and manipulation to favour P&ID.

    Typical of the strategy of locking the stall after the horses have bolted, the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission set up a special P&ID unit specifically for this case to work backwards and prove the different levels of ‘fraud’. In the fireworks that followed, some people were caught in the crossfire. One of such was Nigeria’s counsel, Shasore (SAN), who it transpires had consistently urged Nigerian officials to engage in the arbitration process to avoid an adverse judgment and had penned a letter to EFCC as far back as March 2016 calling on the agency to investigate corruption in the case. Accused of all manner of malpractice and vilified repeatedly in the media for same, Shasore’s experience also showcased another flaw in our system that we must pay attention to, and address vehemently whenever we can: how government functionaries pay little attention to who and what may need to be sacrificed so that they can save face or service their interests. 

    Speaking in this direction in Monday’s judgment, Judge Knowles had scathing words for former Attorney General, Abubakar Malami with respect to the accusations against, and mistreatment, of Shasore.

    He mentioned three matters (Page 101, Para 470) that referred to Nigeria’s conduct in relation to the previous hearing. One of them was, “Mr Malami’s decision to put forward a false and dishonest case in his evidence before Sir Ross Cranston about the alleged corruption of Mr Shasore SAN, which has only been abandoned sub silentio in the course of this trial.”

    He had earlier (Page 96, Para 442-5) had this to say, “Mr Shasore SAN has not, in my judgment, been shown to be corrupt. His actions are inconsistent with Nigeria’s theory that he was….on the other hand, the account given in this judgment shows that responsibility for failures to obtain evidence and to avoid delay lay rather with many ministers and officials, whom Mr Shasore, SAN and others (including Stephenson Harwood and Mr Cordara QC at one stage) pressed repeatedly.”

    In a stunning indictment of the former Attorney General’s conduct in the case, Judge Knowles emphasised: “I add that in my view, Nigeria (and specifically Mr Malami SAN, the Attorney General) did not in truth believe Mr Shasore, SAN was corrupt.” He went on to list facts including the fact that the Nigerian government continued to appoint Mr Shasore to represent its interests in other arbitration cases.

    Sadly, in the euphoria of the quashing of the award, these are other dimensions of the judgment that will escape mentions by the media which had served as channels of amplification of the false allegations for years. Indeed, the judge referred to the fact that Shasore chose not to make any attempt to give any independent account to the court of the allegations made against him – an option which was open to him. I can only conclude that such a golden silence can only be characterised as patriotism.

    The P&ID case has laid bare critical deficiencies in how the Nigerian government sometimes manages contractual agreements. To avert future disputes, Nigeria must mandate adherence to transparency and rigorous due diligence as non-negotiable prerequisites in all business contracts. Contracts must be meticulously researched and formulated to prevent costly legal battles. Nigeria’s oversight and accountability mechanisms concerning foreign investors require substantial improvement.

    The Nigeria vs. P&ID case serves as a stark reminder of the dire consequences that negligence, corruption, and a lack of due diligence can bring about. As Nigeria seeks to recover and glean lessons from this experience, we have a unique opportunity to implement critical reforms that will safeguard the nation’s interests in the future. Through the adoption of transparency, the strengthening of legal frameworks, and a commitment to public engagement, Nigeria can work diligently to prevent the recurrence of such a costly and damaging legal battle.

    • Ogunsote is a public affairs commentator. He writes in from Area 8, Garki, Abuja
  • Losing P&ID case would have cost Nigeria $15b, says  Buhari

    Losing P&ID case would have cost Nigeria $15b, says  Buhari

    If Nigeria had lost its arbitration dispute with Process & Industrial Development (P&ID), it would have cost the country about $15 billion, former President Muhammadu Buhari, has said.

    He noted that his former Chief of Staff (CoS), the late Abba Kyari and the Minister of Justice & Attorney-General of the Federation (AGF), Abubakar Malami, were mandated to find a way out on the issue.

    Buhari’s remarks were contained in an article titled: “A matter of principle.” The article was made available at the weekend by formal presidential spokesman, Mallam Garba Shehu.

    Last week, a Business and Property Court in London, halted the enforcement of the $11 billion arbitration award in favour of P&ID against Nigeria in a case marked CL-2019-000752. 

    In the judgment delivered by Justice Robert Knowles, it was held that the process through which P&ID secured a 2010 contract to build a gas processing plant in Calabar, Cross River State, was fraudulent.

    Reacting, Buhari said: “Rarely in modern times can so few have tried to take so much from so many. If Nigeria had lost its arbitration dispute with Process & Industrial Development in a London court on 23 October, it would have cost our people close to $15 billion.

    “We won, and all decent people can sleep easier as a result. Justice Robin Knowles said Nigeria had been the victim of a monstrous fraud.

    “But it was a close-run thing. As the judge said ‘I end the case acutely conscious of how readily the outcome could have been different, and of the enormous resources ultimately required from Nigeria as the successful party to make good its challenge.’

    “But ordinary Nigerians never took the decisions that ended up before Justice Knowles. Had Nigeria lost, it would have required schools not to be built, nurses not to be trained and roads not to repaired, on an epic scale, to pay a handful of contractors, lawyers and their allies – for a project that never broke ground.

    “How did it get to this point? How did Nigeria prevail? Was this a one-off, or par for a shabby and distasteful course? What are the lessons for the future?

    “The ‘P&ID Affair’ was already firmly set by the time I came into office in 2015. A company registered in the British Virgin Islands that no one had heard of, with hardly any staff or assets, had won a contract to build a gas processing plant in Cross Rivers.

    Read Also: Lagos introduces new transport programme as commissioner seeks support

    “The company was owned by Irish intermediaries who knew Nigeria well and had done business in everything from healthcare to fixing tanks.

    “The previous government could not supply the gas. The plant was never built. Construction was not started. P&ID did not even buy the land for the facility. But the contract, incredibly, was clear: P&ID could sue Nigeria, and claim all the profits it might have made over 20 years as if everything had been completed.

    “Nigeria was in court in London, trying to talk down liability and costs. Back at home, fixers were looking to work out a quiet settlement. This is often the way. A lot of contracts end up in dispute. P&ID won a settlement in 2017 of $6 billion, with compound interest. People, including out-of-work ex-British Cabinet Minister Priti Patel, were queuing up to insist we paid, or risk Nigeria becoming an untrustworthy trade pariah.

    “It was clear that far from the whole story had been told. I tasked Abba Kyari, my chief- of-staff and Attorney- General of the Federation, Abubakar Malami, with finding a way, even at that late stage and despite so much conflicting advice, to get us a fair hearing.

    “Working with a number of different agencies and senior officials of government, we began to find a huge amount of evidence, not all of which Justice Knowles was to accept. But he agreed that P&ID had paid bribes. He agreed that one of P&ID’s founders had committed perjury.

    “And he agreed that P&ID had somehow found in its possession a steady supply of Nigeria’s privileged internal legal documents, outlining our plans, strategies and problems.

    “My own view is that this whole, sorry affair shows how important it is to follow the legal process in resolving a dispute. It shows that given time and opportunity for each side to present their case, the temple of justice can satisfactorily resolve all disputes without resort to extra-judicial measures. It was definitely worth the struggle: this was an attempted heist of historic proportions, an attempt to steal from the treasury a third of Nigeria’s foreign reserves.

    “But even at this moment, we should note what the English judge cautioned. The arbitration process in London “was a shell that got nowhere near the truth.” We need better contracts, in the public and private sector.”

    “And we need greater transparency: the reality is that, had P&ID not conjured up quite such an outlandish ransom, they may have found themselves in the same place as the myriad other invisible contractors who all too often quietly take Nigeria for many millions in out of court settlements. Sterner sanctions are indicated for Nigerian public officials who have been proven to connive with foreign criminals to defraud our country.

     “Nigeria has won this battle with corruption, but the war is far from over. As Justice Knowles concluded, ‘this case has also, sadly, brought together a combination of examples of what some individuals will do for money.

    “Driven by greed and prepared to use corruption; giving no thought to what their enrichment would mean in terms of harm for others.” 

  • Victory in $11b P&ID UK case excites President, EFCC

    Victory in $11b P&ID UK case excites President, EFCC

    President Bola Ahmed Tinubu and the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) yesterday applauded the judgment of a London court on the botched  2010  gas processing plant contract awarded to a firm, Process and Industrial Developments Limited (P&ID).

    While Tinubu said the  “victory is not for Nigeria alone,” the EFCC  maintained that   P&ID has, till today, not been able to show that it legitimately, and lawfully secured the deal.

    P&ID was awarded the 20-year contract by the Ministry of Petroleum Resources in 2010   to construct and operate a gas processing plant in Calabar, Cross River State as part of a wider plan to exploit the country’s abundant gas reserves. 

    After the deal collapsed, P&ID took Nigeria to arbitration in London and on January 31, 2017, was awarded $6.6 billion for lost profits – a sum which swelled with interest to about  $11.5 billion before yesterday’s verdict by Judge Robin  Knowles of Business and Property Court.

    Following the 2017  judgment in favour of P&ID, Nigeria applied for an extension of time and relief from sanctions.

    The application was granted by Judge Ross Cranston of the same court in September 2020, thereby returning the case to arbitration.

    Nigeria had alleged that the gas deal was a scam. 

    Lawyers representing the Federal Government told the court that P&ID officials paid bribes to secure the contract.

    But P&ID   accused Nigeria of “false allegations and wild conspiracy theories.”

    President Tinubu described yesterday’s judgment by Knowles as landmark, hailing the UK Court for prioritising the merits of the case above all other considerations.

    The President added in a   statement   by his Special Adviser on Media and Publicity, Ajuri Ngelale, that the verdict  conclusively  showed that Nigeria would  “no longer be held hostage by economic conspiracies between private firms and solitarily corrupt officials who conspire to extort and indebt the very nations they swear to defend and protect.”

    Read Also: P&ID case: Tinubu welcomes Nigeria’s victory

    He said:  “Today’s (yesterday) victory is not for Nigeria alone. It is a victory for our long-exploited continent and for the developing world at large, which has for too long been on the receiving end of unjust economic malpractice and overt exploitation.

    “Nigeria is appreciative of the tremendous efforts of the defence team and acknowledges the role of the Federal Ministry of Justice and the Office of the Attorney-General in the process of defending Nigeria’s interest in this case.”

    The EFCC  said the judgment had vindicated its belief that the P&ID contract was a highly-orchestrated scam.

    It recalled that the immediate past administration of President Muhammadu Buhari had acted wisely by declining an initial out-of-tribunal agreement for the payment of $850 million to the British firm.

    Vowing to continue with the trial of those suspected of involvement in the botched deal,  the anti-graft agency, said it was pleased with the judgment by Knowles because  Nigeria’s international assets and oil cargoes would have been taken over by   P&ID if the country had lost the case.

    The anti-graft agency added in a statement by its spokesman, Dele Oyewale,  that   the verdict was a welcome relief going by the fact  that   “Nigeria does not even have the capacity to pay the judgment debt.”  

    The statement partly reads:  “Two British nationals –  James Richard Nolan and Adam Quinn (at large) – were, on October 18, 2021, re-arraigned before Justice D.U. Okorowo of the Federal High Court, Abuja for their alleged complicity in the controversial Process and Industrial Development gas processing contract, leading to the $9.6b arbitral award to P&ID Limited by a United Kingdom commercial court.

    “The defendants, both directors of Goidel Resources Limited, a Designated Non-Financial Institution (DNFI) and ICIL Limited, were docked on 32 counts of money laundering. Their trial still continues.”

    Our  global assets freed  from  risks, says Justice minister

    The  Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice,  Lateef Fagbemi (SAN), said the judgment was precedence against similar “fraudulent” cases targeting Nigeria’s assets.

    “It (legal process) has been a night of long knives! This success (verdict)  marks the culmination of over a decade of legal action and is not just a victory for the people of Nigeria, but any similar target of corruption and fraud,” Fagbemi told a news conference in Abuja.

    He revealed that despite dragging Nigeria to court, P&ID never secured any land or site for the project.

    The minister also said there would be further hearings by the UK court to determine costs payable by P&ID to Nigeria and other matters.

    “The arbitral award had over the years placed the assets of the FRN (Federal Republic of Nigeria)  and those of its agencies all over the world at the risk of attachment, erosion of foreign reserves and distortion of monetary, fiscal and other policies of government with attendant dire consequences for Nigeria and its people,” Fagbemi said.

    Making  reference to  the words of Mark Howard KC, Nigeria’s  lead counsel   which he said, the court endorsed,  the minister said:  “P&ID is  exactly the type of entity that was prepared to engage in bribery’, to achieve its aims – to undermine the administration of justice in Nigeria in the pursuit of, ‘riches beyond the dreams of avarice.”

    Fagbemi posited that the success of the appeal represented a decisive victory for   Nigerians “who stood to lose over  $11 billion, and for the Nigerian administration which has now reached a milestone in its mission to challenge the scourge of corruption.”

    He added: “The judgment also serves as a damning indictment of predatory international investors, who should now rightfully be deterred from preying upon Nigeria and other developing nations to satisfy their greed.

    “P&ID and its associates both Nigerians and foreigners alike, shamelessly attempted to defraud the country and enrich themselves through sharing the FRN’s privileged documents, fraud, bribery and corruption on an industrial scale. Those efforts, which took place over many years, have finally been uncovered for all to see.

    “It is imperative to point out that several agents of P&ID made overtures to the government for settlement of this case. However, the resolve of the administration of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu not to go hands in gloves with fraudulent counterparties or condone corruption informed the position of the FRN to hold fast to its position and not settle.”

    “Indeed, earlier this morning, the President at the opening ceremony of the Nigeria Economic Summit Group, reiterated this cardinal position of his administration.

    “History has been made today(yesterday), as this judgment is no doubt significant in the annals of Nigeria and indeed Africa. This judgment has vindicated the government and should serve as a pointer to others who might be nursing or nurturing any plan to swindle Nigeria.”

  • P&ID: Not yet a closure

    P&ID: Not yet a closure

    It was a case of a Daniel coming to judgment in faraway United Kingdom yesterday where Judge Robin Knowles of the Business and Property Court finally dismissed the so-called $6.6billion arbitral judgment won by Process & Industry Development (P&ID) Ltd against Nigeria over a failed 2010 deal to develop a gas processing plant. While granting the country the long sought reprieve, the court held that the award was obtained by fraud and that what has happened in the case is contrary to public policy.

    The saga centred on a 2010 agreement between P&ID and the federal government to build a gas processing plant in Calabar, Cross River State. Along the line, nothing happened. The company later claimed that the contract failed because the Nigerian government did not fulfil its end of the bargain. Although the was no record that the company ever moved to the project site not to talk of turning the sod, it sort of guaranteed itself ample protection in the perverse, blatantly one-sided and artfully worded contract documents to sustain any claim of injury in the unlikelihood of the project ever seeing the light of day!

    And so the claim went before international arbitration, that Nigeria, the giant with the feet of clay, deprived P&ID the potential benefits expected from 20 years’ worth of gas supplies with “anticipated profits of $5 to $6 billion.” The country, on its part, had countered that P&ID actually failed to acquire the site and build Gas Processing Facilities and that this failure was a fundamental breach as “no gas could be delivered until this has been done.”

    To the arbitral tribunal however, Nigeria’s obligations under Article 6B of the contract were not conditional upon P&ID having constructed any gas processing facilities!

    Summary: Nigeria, for all its care, could spend billions to pipe its gas to anywhere or nowhere; nothing in the contract expressly commits P&ID to providing an onsite receiving facility to take the gas! And for this, Nigeria was to pay P&ID $6.6 billion as damages, as well as pre-and post-judgment interest at seven per cent!

    For a contract that would ordinarily be deemed to be perverse – at least according to UK’s Judge Knowles – the ensuing arbitral award would stand apart in bizarre, public policy jurisprudence!

    Yours truly could not but rue the fate that would have befallen our beleaguered country had yesterday’s judgment gone the other way. We are here referring to an award which at the time of the judgment was already in excess of $11 billion. Think of the accompanying shock waves at a time the country’s standing in global financial circles is already shaky; a time when there are already, silent whispers about our trading partners rejecting Nigeria’s letters of credit. I thought for a moment about our foreign assets and what would happen to them in the dark, conspiratorial, shark-infested waters of global finance!

    Was yours truly frustrated? Supressed anger would be a better description. For if it seems hard to imagine Nigeria’s Corruption Inc. and its allies walking away with the massive trophy after brazenly scamming a whole country, the audaciousness of a plot that would reduce a whole country to a most cruel joke in global capitals would most certainly be impossible to swallow.

    Thanks to The Cable – Nigeria’s online medium for breaking the story and staying on it till this very moment. Now we know the story is not your typical single, straight line story of two parties locked in dispute over perceived breaches of contractual terms; rather, it is an intriguingly complex, confounding story of fraud: the collusion between cross-border crooks and fraudsters, high profile Nigerian lawyers and their evil or is it ‘civil’ servants counterparts.

    As one would imagine of the typical Nigerian story, there were interesting twists and turns, such as when the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, in a parallel investigation actually found evidence of two bank transfers totalling $20,000 made by Dublin-based Industrial Consultants (International) Ltd. — part of the P&ID group of companies — to a Nigerian government lawyer, Grace Taiga, who oversaw the award of the gas plant contract, purportedly for “medical costs!

    Or another interesting aside featuring Olasupo Shasore SAN, Nigeria’s first counsel in the P&ID arbitration saga, who despite receiving the sum of two million dollars, allegedly worked against the interest of his client! In fact, one Mark Howard, said to be Nigeria’s legal representative, stated point blank that in the first two stages of the arbitration, Shasore, deliberately “defended the case thinly”. More than that; that Shasore also allegedly made questionable payments of $100,000 each to Folakemi Adelore and Ikechukwu Oguine, both legal representatives of the ministry of petroleum resources and NNPC respectively. In short, the trio, who also discouraged Nigeria from strongly contesting claims of the British firm, formed the settlement team that jetted to London for settlement negotiations with P&ID!

    Read Also: Tribunal upholds ex-House leader Doguwa’s election

    Yes, all of that and perhaps more were said to have happened!

    The problem with P&ID case is that the company did not confine itself to playing in the local league which, thanks to our inept institutions and their consort of criminal enablers would ordinarily have afforded them maximum protection. They would rather go after a much bigger prize – our foreign reserves including, where possible, other assets domiciled in foreign shores. Had the company chosen to play local, the story would have been different.

    Safe to say that Nigeria only got lucky this time around; in a country where spurious judgment debts have become something of an industry for fortune-hunters, the case of the P&ID only sticks out because of the greed quotient and the fact that the sought out trophy is huge – far beyond our borders! Talk of a more malignant variant of Nigeria’s Corruption Inc.

    Recall that the Buhari administration with only a few days to leave office in May reportedly shelled out  $566.75 million, 98.52 million pounds sterling ($124.35 million) and N226.28 billion naira ($491.92 million) allegedly incurred by federal ministries, department and agencies as judgment debts! How much of that is spurious is something that Nigerians would never know.

    Again, Nigerians would also recall the story of the $418 million Paris Club refund ‘consultancy fee’ over which the Nigerian Governors Forum is locked in dispute with ‘consultants’ whose services the governors body maintained, were neither solicited for nor were offered, remains live. The last we heard was the governors vowing to continue to explore all legal channels available to them in ensuring that ‘’resources belonging to states are not unjustly or illegally paid to a few in the guise of consultancies.’’

    Far from closure, the P&ID story is only partly ended. There will certainly be no closure until all the company’s named accomplices are served the bitter pill of judicial retribution. It is something that yours truly – as indeed all lovers of Nigeria – can’t wait to see happen.