Tag: Place

  • Chukwu: Weak bench cost Eagles quarter-final place

    Former Nigeria coach Christian Chukwu has said the key factor behind the Super Eagles’ second round ouster from the 2014 FIFA World Cup in Brazil was the lack of a strong bench.

    Nigeria got eliminated by France in the round of 16 after a 2-0 late win in Brasilia, an outcome the Enugu Rangers technical consultant thinks could have gone the other way if the African champions had not lacked attacking bite, depth and sound tactical awareness against the Le Bues.

    Chukwu said Stephen Keshi’s men had the opportunity to write their names in the history books by dumping out France to reach the last eight.

    “The team obviously gave its best in the encounter against France, and we cannot argue that but my main grouse is that we lacked a strong bench and by implication whenever any key player gets injured, we are left with little or no options,” Chukwu told DailyNewsWatch.

    “This has always been my argument. If you have a good bench, the impact of a key player exiting the game either through injury or suspension is less felt, and the vacuum wouldn’t have been so glaring as we saw in the France game after Ogenyi (Onazi) was out injured. As a result the coach could not make changes when he needed to.

    “I think it’s always safe to have two very strong players competing for the same position and Nigeria being blessed with so much talent cannot boast of anything less,” he continued.

    “That we were not able to emphasize on this before the World Cup is unfortunate but hopefully we will learn from this mistake ahead of future major tournaments.

    “In the France game we also failed to utilize any of the chances we created and that proved costly.

    “In summary, I would say it’s a good experience for some of the boys, because it’s not easy playing at the World Cup for the first time, though their performance fell below the expectation of Nigerians.

    “We are however trying to review this performance and make the necessary recommendations,” he concluded.

     

  • Britain’s Place in Europe

    Britain’s Place in Europe

    Euro-scepticism has remained a current in British politics, long after Britain put aside centuries of anti-European sentiment to join the Common Market in 1973 and to become a member of the more highly integrated European Union 20 years later.

    Until now, periodic spasms of parochialism did little lasting harm. But since the European debt crisis and recession, there has been growing sentiment across the British political spectrum for leaving the European Union. As Roger Carr, the leader of Britain’s biggest business group, the Confederation of British Industry, rightly warned on Monday, this latest trend needs to be taken seriously and strongly countered by pro-European business and political leaders. Leading political figures expect a national referendum to be called on continued British membership in the European Union, probably for 2015. If it were held today, an Opinion/Observer poll suggests, the anti-European side would prevail, with a large majority of Conservatives, a plurality of Labour voters and a significant minority of Liberal Democrats voting for a British exit.

    Leaving the union would be a grave mistake, sacrificing Britain’s best hopes for a brighter economic future to half-baked longing for the simpler days when the British ruled an empire and had less need for European trade. There’s plenty of time for pro-Europe leaders to make that case. But they must heed Mr. Carr’s advice and speak up.

    Twenty-seven countries now belong to the European Union, with several more nations like Iceland, Serbia and Turkey hoping to join. Even without further expansion, the union accounts for almost 50 percent of British trade and is its largest trading partner.

    Of course, the sceptics can point to the European Union’s many disappointments. Too much senseless, stifling regulation flows from a bureaucracy with too little democratic accountability. Costly and indefensible agricultural subsidies to local farmers deny needed markets to developing countries and are a factor in driving economic refugees to Europe, a movement that politicians like to rant against.

    The euro was established as a common currency with too little preparation and institutional support. And, over the past year, Chancellor Angela Merkel of Germany has been destructively pushing her partners to enact laws that would prolong the recession by setting rigid deficit ceilings, denying countries the fiscal flexibility sometimes needed to revive growth.

    But the union’s shortcomings are all the more reason for Britain to keep its seat at the table where Europe’s economic future will be made.

    Britain, as the Continent’s third-largest economy after Germany and France, has had a crucial role in shaping European policy, pushing the bloc toward freer trade and away from political federalism. And it has helped preserve the rights of others to opt out of unwanted initiatives like the euro. With decisions on fiscal policy, bank supervision and financial regulation likely to be made in the near future, Britain’s voice is needed more than ever to protect British interests and larger European ones as well.

    British supporters of continued European Union membership in all three major parties and in the business community need to counter the seductive simplicities of the euro-bashers who claim that Britain can ignore Europe and thrive on its own. They need to make the case that British engagement in Europe should be, as Mr. Carr put it Monday, “the linchpin of our wider global trade ambitions.” Britain needs the European Union as much as it needs Britain.

    – A version of this editorial appeared in print on November 23, 2012, on page A34 of the New York edition with the headline: Britain’s Place in Europe.