Tag: polity

  • Ekiti poll: Group decries dearth of substance in polity

    Ekiti poll: Group decries dearth of substance in polity

    Ahead of this year’s governorship election in Ekiti State, a non-governmental and non-partisan public advocacy organisation, Ekiti Future Agenda (EFA), has decried the lack of political substance, formidable ideology and quality electioneering in the build-up to the July poll.

    The group condemned what it called petty issues, pedestrian propaganda and mundane communication have dominated the political scene.

    It urged the stakeholders, especially the aspirants, to showcase their manifestos, development blueprints and agenda for genuine development of the state, instead of engaging “in fairy tale, war of words and propaganda contests”.

    EFA’s Convener Adesina Adetola said the trend would not give the people the opportunity to elect the best candidate in the July poll.

    The activist said unless urgent steps were taken, the state might be going into another political bondage for the next four years.

    Adetola said: “In the face of the current happenings in the state, where most of the political gladiators, instead of telling the people why they are interested in the race, are outdoing one another in inconsequential issues by engaging the youths as bulldogs to continually and irrepressibly attack their political rivals – physically and most especially via the social media – it is obvious that the state has a long way to go in laying a resourceful foundation for its younger generation.”

    The EFA convener said while the electorate was waiting for the political parties to elect their flag bearers, the delegates, who will elect the candidate at the primaries, need to know what the aspirants have in stock for the growth and socio-economic development of the state.

    He added: “It is a fact that the state needs a visionary leader, an individual who has a robust idea of what genuine development and true governance entail in this 21st century. The state, at this crucial stage of contemporary global advancement, cannot afford a leader without a thoroughly packaged and realistic development blueprint, supported by a well-articulated political ideology that will consequently aid the socio-economic development of the state in all ramifications.”

    EFA, which was founded in 2012, mobilises public opinion towards building and sustaining democratic values and culture to aid a better and rewarding future for the people.

    Last December, the organisation, in conjunction with another socio-economic group, The Pacers, organised a public lecture in Ado-Ekiti where participants highlighted strategies for taking Ekiti out of its current political doldrums. The guest speakers at the lecture, which was chaired by a veteran journalist, Dare Babarinsa, included Ekiti State Deputy Governor Kolapo Olusola; an Abuja-based businessman and politician, Muyiwa Olumilua; the Dean of the Faculty of Engineering at the University of Lagos (UNILAG), Prof Funso Falade and Prof Femi Olokesusi of Afe Babalola University Ado-Ekiti (ABUAD).

     

     

     

     

     

  • A bovine stench in the polity

    A bovine stench in the polity

    The scourge of herdsmen attacks in and around farming communities in Nigeria has recently reached a disturbing crescendo. This has been reflected in national discourse. The issue is heightened, this time, by immutable facts.  But while these facts may be insufficient to make reasoned conclusions, they are enough to bring an unstable nation to the brink of an all-out ethno-religious war from which it may never recover.

    For anyone wondering how the seemingly harmless matter of cattle rearing is setting off national red flags, a brief statement of the facts as they stand may be necessary. The Fulanis of Nigeria, predominantly found in northern Nigeria, are age-long cattle farmers who control the cattle trade in Nigeria. Largely because of climatic conditions, Fulani herdsmen have, for many years, adopted nomadic pastoralism that involves grazing cattle along routes that cut through the Middle Belt and extend deep into the south. Along this route, they inevitably encounter crop farmers.

    For many years, separate issues such as religious tensions between the majority Muslim north and Christian south and other ethnic issues have influenced the relations between Fulani herdsmen and crop farmers along their route. The consequence is that their interactions are not always pleasant. In the past one year alone, it has been reported that over 1000 documented deaths have occurred in connection with this friction between herdsmen and crop farmers in different parts of the country.

    The lack of official security action concerning this issue has generated even more anger in the last two years because Muhammadu Buhari, the incumbent president and a retired army General, is Fulani and a cattle farmer.  This particular fact may have underlined the weak official response to vicious attacks related to Fulani herdsmen activities. It has also been recently revealed that most of the frontline Fulani traditional rulers in the North are all patrons of Miyetti Allah, the umbrella body of the pastoralists. These two facts have led many to conclusions that are unflattering of the president and his commitment, above Fulani interests, to the general peace of the country.

    Unfortunately, what is still being classified by government spokesmen as “communal clashes” is fast spiralling into the most tempestuous crisis the country has ever seen. All of the issues of Boko Haram and religious intolerance, border security, ethnic marginalisation, inconsistent and careless legislation, political wrangling between regions of the country and all other lingering issues from unsavoury parts of the country’s history, have somehow found place within the simple problem of grazing for cattle. It is almost unbelievable.

    Recent accounts of violence by herdsmen in communities in Rivers, Akwa Ibom, Delta and significantly, the Nimbo massacre in Enugu, in 2016, amongst many others, has seen many frayed nerves.

    Beyond Nigeria, the Fulani people inhabit areas in 20 African countries, with significant populations in about 10 countries in West Africa, some of which border Nigeria. The existence of a militant arm of the Fulani tribe that aids and accompany the herdsman across all territories is also known. In November 2015, the Global Terrorism Index ranked the Fulani militant group as the fourth deadliest terrorist group in the world, behind Boko Haram, Al-shabab and ISIS. This fact is yet to be acknowledged by the Nigerian government.

    The Fulani militia have orchestrated and contributed to deadly killings all over Africa, including in the conflict-ridden Central African Republic, CAR, and right here at home in Nigeria. Thousands have been killed over cattle across Africa, yet the Nigerian government refuses to recognise the terrorism perpetrated by Fulani herdsmen in herding their cattle.

    The porosity of border security between Nigeria and the countries that border her, especially in the north, also allows the movement of people, including the Fulani, in and out of Nigeria without as much as cursory questioning. The traffic is large, especially in connection to labour for the vast cattle trade in Nigeria, which includes lightly armed herdsmen and their heavily armed militant cohorts.

    During election periods in any of the countries with substantial Fulani influence, like Nigeria, the people traffic intensifies.

    The situation in the CAR is particularly instructive because the ‘agricultural terrorism’ of the Fulani militants has led to the rise of many ethnic militias that are fighting a war within the war in the CAR, against Fulani militants. This is why the attacks launched by the Bachama militia in Numan, Adamawa State, against Fulani settlements last December, is very troubling. It can set off a wave of ethnic militias resorting to self-help against the marauding Fulani herdsmen, and it was not the first time communities would go all out against the Fulani herdsmen.

    However, the most significant move by the government towards resolution of all of this has been the introduction in the National Assembly of a “National Grazing Routes and Reserves Bill” which purportedly holds the solution. The bill contemplates the setting up of a commission to oversee the establishment of grazing routes and reserves in every state of the country. The reserves can potentially house as many as 40 ranches, according to Audu Ogbeh, the Minister for Agriculture and Rural Development.

    Sourcing of the extensive land contemplated in the bill is, according to Part IV, to be done through compulsory acquisition of land in the different states, with the “cooperation” of the governors.

    Apart from the potential distortion to commercial and private interests in the states, it is unclear whether the commission will actually have any authority to acquire lands which are legally vested in state governors by the requirements of the Land Use Act (LUA) of 1978, a controversial Act that is the prevailing land law in the country.

    Potential conflict may arise from considerations relating to the acquisition of land which may not meet the requirements of “overriding public interest” in the LUA and the 1999 Constitution. Also, the matter of compensation to any affected persons is not adequately provided for, with reference only to “necessary compensation” which may include resettlement, in contrast to adequate pecuniary compensation.

    A big problem also appears in Section 29 where it is said that pastoralists will not be allowed to graze outside the grazing routes except under “exceptional circumstances”. In defining these circumstances, the bill mainly restates that they must be “exceptional”. With due respect to the drafters, this is more or less a return to the status quo. Apart from the maddening connotations that imply land grabbing to accommodate non-local private interests to which many southern governors will not “cooperate”, the bill is a colossal waste of legislative time and energy.

    Many states have responded with anti-grazing laws. These states include Benue State, the stage for the latest gruesome attack by Fulani herdsmen that claimed more than 73 lives. The Benue government and people have been particularly hostile because of destruction of their crops. The herdsmen again dealt the only hand they deal, the hand of violence, just at the turn of the New Year.

    The sponsors of the Fulani herdsmen have always relied on the force of ‘consequences’ to assert their will. The table may be turning on them in equally bloody ways which may lead to even more bloodshed. The somewhat aloof government under President Buhari needs to prescribe adequate legal consequence for violence of any kind in order to stem these clashes now. It can start by tracing and prosecuting the sponsors of the herdsmen. We all know they are not the true owners of the cattle.

    Whether this is a Fulani agenda or mere sponsored violence, the lack of definitive action and absence of a lasting solution only leads the country in one direction – total chaos. The herdsmen menace already provides the violent opponents of the government and other evil doers with a veritable avenue to explore; letting it linger will be unwise for this administration.

  • Restructuring: of the polity or the mind?

    Given the political history of Nigeria, it is conceivable that many of its leaders, especially those of military background would find problems of underdevelopment of the country in people’s mindset

    Recently, General Olusegun Obasanjo added his voice to the ongoing debate on restructuring by calling for restructuring of the mind of the Nigerian persona, rather than of the polity and economy of the country. Characteristically, whatever utterance the former president makes is bound to attract attention, not necessarily for his profundity but mostly with regards to the former president’s unique participation in the governance of the country in two capacities: military dictator and elected president. His latest contribution to the debate has, justifiably, been a topic for discussion, especially on the social media. While it is surprising that newspaper interviewers have not gone back to the former president to make him elaborate on his diagnosis of the country’s problems, the former president seems to have said enough to engender further discussions of his new theory of poor or ineffective governance in the country.

    Whatever nuances may have inhered in President Obasanjo’s theory of mental restructuring, it, in its denotative form, calls for major change of mindset of the country’s citizens, from top to bottom. In any community where there are problems, it is not unusual for perceptive leaders to attribute such problems to the mindset of citizens. Such buck passing is common, particularly on the part of leaders who want to shift the failings of their performance on followers. Only few leaders in history like to accept their own share of blame for consequences that arise from legacies bequeathed by them, particularly when citizens complain about such projects or visions.

    Given the political history of Nigeria, it is conceivable that many of its leaders, especially those of military background would find problems of underdevelopment of the country in people’s mindset. It is thus not surprising that of all the military generals that have had opportunity to participate in the governance of the country, only an infinitesimal minority had shown understanding of the role of political structure on the ineffective governance of the country. Such leaders cannot be up to ten percent of the hundreds of military men who had served as head of state, governors, ministers, and leaders of government agencies. The reason for this may be that just a few of such former military officers in political power had the opportunity to restructure their minds, to the extent that they are able to recognise the role of the architecture of governance between 1966 and now on peace and progress in the country. The change in the consciousness of former military leaders, such as retired Admiral Kanu, Lt-General Akinrinade, and even General Babangida and a few others who recently got converted to the imperative of restructuring of the polity shows that mental restructuring being promoted by General Obasanjo is not as exotic as it may sound.

    The mindset that re-designed Nigeria away from its federal system in 1960 is incontrovertibly that of the military. Many commenters have argued that whatever mistakes military rulers made between the end of the civil war and 1999 was more likely to have been of the head rather than of the heart. In other words, those involved in military rule must have meant well for the country when they made policies and decrees that degraded the country’s federal system or that they could only give what they had as professionals trained to live by command. Today’s column is not about apportioning blame as much as it is about showing how mindsets can create problems and how restructured mindsets can identify solutions to such problems. Increase in the volume of revenue garnered from petroleum export during the years in which military leaders enjoyed chorusing that “the problem of Nigeria was not money but how to spend it” must have convinced military minders of the country that creating a unitary system of mini states funded principally with revenue from oil was the most creative intervention any group of patriotic leaders like them could make. That mindset stimulated the philosophy of ‘Even Development’, not in terms of what is done for citizens across the country but in terms of allocation of funds to governments of a total of 36 states and 774 local governments.

    Of course, such intervention created opportunities for many bureaucrats and professionals in the 36 states to become governors, commissioners, and contractors made possible by revenue from petroleum and reduction of the percentage of such revenue reserved for regions of origin of petroleum and other resources at independence. Even traditional rulers got their own share of the soft cake, as more crown-wearing Obas, Emirs, Obis, and Obongs were created by fiat at the instance of state governors. What the military rulers and new designers of Nigeria overlooked was that anything unsavoury could happen to revenue from oil. Many civilians benefiting from creation of 12 to 36 states did not notice if the promise of stimulating development by bringing governments closer to the people ever materialised. The kind of fragmentation of governance units in vogue under military dictators is now back among lawmakers who are bent on giving autonomy to 774 local governments enshrined in the 1999 Constitution. Those waiting in the wings to become chairmen and supervising councillors, as well as village heads aspiring to become crowned traditional rulers are not likely to see anything wrong with creating and maintaining 774 governance units in a country less than twice the size of Texas, one of 50 states in the United States. Not many civilians are likely to take time to understand evolution in the history and culture of fossil oil and the possible impact gradual or sudden changes in the petroleum market is likely to have on the polity and economy of the not so distant future. Former President Obasanjo thus deserves kudos for bringing up the importance of restructuring of the mind.

    Certainly, a mindset that created a political and economic structure that has lost its relevance over time certainly requires that the problems created by the original mindset be changed before changing the mindset itself, more so if such mindset has become so ingrained that it might be resistant to change.  It is the need to control damage that has been created by a specific mode of thinking that now drives patriots to call for restructuring of the country’s polity. This demand in no way suggests that mental restructuring is unnecessary. To proponents of restructuring, it is more logical to first do away with a structure that is counterproductive before reforming the minds of those who created such flawed design, more so that such design diminishes the quality of the lives of majority of the population.  It is not accidental that most of the military men who contributed to de-federalisation of the country believe that everything about the structure of governance in the country is already cast in stone or iron. It is human for those who created the flawed design to see their ego as being bruised by people with a different mindset about how to nurture a multiethnic nation-state into a truly federal democracy. It is realistic for those who contributed to the current quasi-federal system to believe that some parts of them and of their valued legacy projects are likely to be jettisoned in the event of restructuring or re-federalisation.

    There is no evidence that those calling for political restructuring are averse to restructuring of the mind of individuals—rulers and the ruled. If anything, restructuring of the country’s political and economic system is likely to be more efficient for exercise in mental restructuring. Just as many citizens have become inured over time to the parasitic economic model created to power a parasitic political system that people now perceive to be unsustainable, so are they likely to be incentivised to cultivate a new mindset to respond to a political and economic structure that fuels achievement orientation in individuals; productivity on the part of communities; and more freedom of thought and action with which restructuring is bound to endow all communities and citizens. Without doubt, the country will benefit tremendously from political and mental restructuring, more so if the former takes place before the latter. It should not be hard for those advocates for political restructuring and those calling for mental restructuring to collaborate, as doing so can accelerate the process of creating sustainable unity, democracy, and economic development.

    Roposek@msn.com

  • Stop heating the polity, PDP youths tell leaders

    A  group, the Kaduna Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) Youth Solidarity Forum, yesterday charged leaders of the party to stop heating up the polity but seek alternative ways of addressing issues affecting them.

    In a statement by its chairman, Danjuma Sarki, the group expressed support for the Bamanga Tukur-led PDP.

    The youths, who were reacting to the division in the party, said the PDP in Kaduna State remains one, intact and indivisible under the chairmanship of Abubakar Haruna.

    Haruna, they said, was duly endorsed by the caucus of the party in the state and has been performing well since assumption of office.

    They described those behind the new PDP in the state as desperate politicians and spent forces seeking unavailable relevance.

    A group, Save Kaduna, spearheaded by a former chairman of the PDP in the state, Yaro Makama, last week expressed support for the Abubakar Baraje- led faction of the party.

    It accused the Vice President Sambo Namadi of failing to harness the fortunes of the party in the state for the collective good of all members.

     

  • 2015: Senate warns against overheating polity

    2015: Senate warns against overheating polity

    The Senate yesterday warned those overheating the polity with regards to the 2015 general elections to cease in the interest of the country.

    The upper legislative chamber also told those beating the drums of war to realise that no nation survives two civil wars.

    It asked President Goodluck Jonathan to fund the operation of the state of emergency in Borno, Adamawa and Yobe properly as well as support the states under emergency rule with additional fund to recover quickly.

    Senate President David Mark, in a speech to mark the end of the second session of the Seventh Senate, said it was unfortunate that some individuals overheat the polity when the 2015 elections are two years away.

    Elected officials, Mark said, should focus on governance and justify their present mandate instead of dissipating energy by overheating the polity.

    He said: “Now, it is time to speak out once again. Elections are two years away.

    “Yet the collision of vaulting personal ambitions is overheating the polity and distracting the onerous task of governance.

    “With so much work yet to be done, we as elected officials should focus on governance and justify our present mandate.

    “Overheating the polity is unnecessary, diversionary, divisive, destructive, unhelpful and unpatriotic.

    “Into this vitriolic mix is being thrown a spate of mindless and distempered effusions that add no value whatsoever to the quest for national cohesion and development.

    “Those beating the drums of war should realise that no nation can survive two civil wars. These trends must stop, and we must remember that the nation is greater than the sum total of its parts.”

    On why the Senate endorsed emergency rule in the states, he said in a country where the Boko Haram insurgency was blighting the Northeast, the National Assembly initially approved the declaration of a state of emergency in some local government areas.

    Mark said because the initial step proved ineffective, they had given their imprimatur to emergency proclamation in Adamawa, Borno and Yobe states.

    Said he: “In the face of a brutal challenge to our territorial integrity and corporate existence and the attendant carnage, we were right to demonstrate the capacity and will to take action.

    “However, let me say that the Nigerian Armed Forces are not at war with the communities in which the terrorists are operating, nor are they at war with Islam.

    “Rather, we are at war with Boko Haram and its affiliates, a terrorist network preaching an ideology that violence against Nigerians and foreigners, Muslims and Christians, is justified in pursuit of a depraved cause.”

    The Senate President said the military campaign against violent extremism, at home and abroad, must be quick, surgical and precise, with as little collateral damage as possible.

    He added: “We know that the foe is faceless, unyielding, unreasonable and more often than not blinded by zealotry.

    “This notwithstanding, we expect our fighting men and women to respect and abide by the rules of engagement.

    We appreciate the enormity of their sacrifice, the asymmetric nature of the egregious foes and the extremely hazardous operational environment.”

    Mark said many of the country’s troops have paid the supreme price for the country.

    A great many of Nigerian countrymen and women, he said, have been cut down in their prime, adding that they are victims of a senseless and mindless onslaught.

    His words: “Together, they are our martyrs for freedom. Their martyrdom shall never be in vain.”

    Senator Mark stressed the need to avoid a war of attrition, saying despite the odds, a grateful and anxious nation eagerly awaits a quick but decisive victory.

  • ‘You can’t have successful politicians in an unsuccessful polity’

    A confident and bright-eyed young lad stared at the camera. The wide and starry look in his gaze spoke volume of a courageous boy with a thirst for adventure, determined to rule his world.

    Decades after, his life became eventful, full of exploits, controversies, rebellions and more. That boy then, Prof. Bankole Ajibabi Omotoso turned 70 last Saturday.

    Famed for his role in the advert of Vodacom Telecommunications, South Africa, he is popularly known in that clime as Yebo Gogo. He is a novelist, dramatist, actor, critic, biographer, founding General Secretary of the Association of Nigerian Authors (ANA) while Chinua Achebe was president and in 1988 was ANA president.

    The picture of the ‘young Kole’ was an exhibit at The Kole Omotoso Exhibition – Akure to Joburg. It was part of a three-day activities marking his birthday that began with an exhibition at Jazzhole, Lagos and climaxed at the Ondo State capital, his homeland.

    Being 70 is a feat worth celebrating, it was said, and so his friends led by the activist-poet Odia Ofeimum with the Ondo State government chose to honour the author whose creative and scholarly works have contributed to the development of scholarship. The events presented many, including family members, the opportunity to honour their own.

    For his daughter, Yewande, being 70 is an accomplishment worth experiencing. “It is still my wish to be blessed enough to grow old and be my father’s kind of 70 – sparkly, mischievous and wise.”

    The events were also spyglasses through which guests saw the writer, his works, ideologies, controversies and sojourns. Like a restless sojourner, his soul moved from one phase of life, clime and circumstance to the other, joining other restless but ‘progressive’ minds – Professors Soyinka, Biodun Jeyifo, Yemi Ogunbiyi, Femi Osofisan, Godino Darah, Ofeimum among others, who are bearing compelling voices of revolution. As Ofeimum rightly observed all the while, Omotoso was merely “shifting the camera” of life.

    The reading, exhibition and lecture by Prof. Darah entitled: Radicals, Literature and Nigeria just before 2014 and performance of the celebrator’s play, Yes and Know to the Freedom Chatter, a play about post-Apartheid South Africa by Hornbill House of Arts, heralded his convictions.

    Guests saw a man that is committed to the ‘Nigerian project’; one who Omotoso believes in “true federalism”. His despair over the state of the country was also evident. With the Democracy Day celebrations on the way, Omotoso asks: “What can we celebrate?” And when the efforts to create the needed change failed, he was left with no choice than to relocate. This led to his sojourns in the academic and abroad, it was said.

    “You cannot have successful politicians in an unsuccessful polity. I believe that when we abandon the humanist tradition. Many would play up their own facts, ignoring the facts that affected others, pretending that those things didn’t happen. However, as always the facts people fail to acknowledge is what comes to haunt them,” he said.

    Being involved with writers such as the late Chinua Achebe and Wole Soyinka in forming writers’ organisations in Nigeria, the West Africa regions, the continent and the African Diaspora, one would have thought he would praise the novel for its contribution to the development of the polity. That was not to be because, according to him, there is “an absence of the Nigerian Federation in the Nigerian novel.” Although he opined that the novel should not be prescriptive, it should galvanise ideas that would bring about positive change.

    The Nobel laureate, Soyinka praised Omotoso’s penchant for intellectual radicalism, saying Omotoso was one of the radicals who “peppered all discourse and action with Marxian pellets of varied sizes, validity and effectiveness”. He dubbed him (Omotoso) along with Jeyifo, Ogunbiyi and Osofisan the literary quartet which he called “the ‘Gang of Four’”.

    He recalled: “Kole Omotoso blew in from nowhere, an Arabic scholar with a yen for literature, and especially – drama. His exit from the Department of Arabic Studies in the University of Ibadan (UI) was a dramatic foretaste of academic Boko Haramism – but where you still lived to tell the tale – so I shall leave the telling thereof to him whenever he chooses. Beginning from UI where I then headed the Drama Department, he had begun to monitor rehearsals. I next transferred to Ife. I believe I invited him to join us for a spell as a visiting lecturer.

    “Next thing I knew, he had transferred completely to my department where his presence was soon to be markedly felt as one of the radical faculty – Ife/Ibadan/Ahmadu Bello then formed the radical axis of Nigerian academia, with Ife as the hyper-active fulcrum…when he shifted to South Africa and found that the Rand did not quite fulfil its promise, and with a wife, two fast growing lads and a daughter to maintain in a strange land, he proved a very adroit adjuster and entrepreneur.

    “…Curiously enough, what I remember most vividly of Kole’s sojourn at Ife had nothing to do with the foregoing. I had just had dinner with him and some others – this time in his home – when, as he saw me off to my car, a heavenly body streaked across the sky in a lance of sparks. It flew so low, and sank over a horizon so close to where we stood, that I was convinced it could not have landed further than perhaps five to 10 kilometres away. Kole, who had his back to this streaking visitor, had not seen it. For days, I scoured the pages of the media, expecting to read some report of the celestial landing. Nothing at all.

    “Then I took to hunting in that direction, hoping I might come across a patch of recently charred forest that would explain the visitation. No such encounter. As I contemplated this piece, that meteoric event flashed yet again across the years. It strikes me now as symbolic of the constellation of some of the astute and restless minds that streaked across the campus sky of Ile-Ife, vanished over the horizon, split up and resurfaced in myriad places – some as far flung as the US and Carribean. Kole’s cinder re-surfaced – and continued to ignite young minds – in South Africa.”

    Governor Olusegun Mimiko described Omotoso and the late D.O Fagunwa as two of Ondo’s exports to the world, noting that they are “our contributions to the pool of teachers, writers, scholars and professionals who have done both our state and country proud in their different fields of endeavour.” He said celebrating the writer is part of government’s move to make the state a creative and cultural destination.

    He said: “My first interaction with Professor Omotoso was way back in the 70s in what then was University of Ife. The Ife of that era was the Ife of Socialist ferment, of progressive intellectualism, of committed lecturers – teaching eager and willing students. It was the Ife of Segun Osoba, Toye Olorode and many other scholars of the socialist hue.

    “It has been an unending chain of collaboration since then between the birthday boy and his state of birth. he has never looked back in putting something back to the Sunshine State in terms of ideas, suggestions, and as you might have rightly guessed, objective and game changing criticism.

    This, therefore, is to say a happy birthday to a worthy son of the soil, global player of repute, commentator, essayist and playwright – our own professor Omotoso.”

    Ofeimum said Omotoso’s works herald significant lessons of history for people to learn from.

    “As a foremost icon of the literary arts and of popular culture in Nigeria and South Africa, he happens to have been quite a very unobtrusive purveyor of ideas that are true, even if unusual. He always deserved to be feted beyond the rituals of raised wine glasses. Whether he is celebrated in grand Nigerian style or refused to oblige due to some writer’s quirk, it was, for us, less about his age than his devotion to things of the mind.”

     

     

  • Orji to Reps: Don’t overheat polity with threat

    Orji to Reps: Don’t overheat polity with threat

    Abia State Governor Theodore Orji has urged House of Representatives members not to overheat the polity with their impeachment threat against President Goodluck Jonathan over budget implementation.

    He said it could worsen the tension created by rising insecurity, and called for a peaceful resolution of the issues.

    The governor, in a statement by his spokesman, Mr Ben Onyechere, said the “altercation” over budget implementation between the presidency and the National Assembly should be avoided.

    “It will exacerbate the current tension created by insecurity in parts of the northern states.

    “As such, we must be careful not to create unnecessary distractions from our focus, which is to provide and upgrade the living standards of our people while shunning measures that will increase political volatility,” he said.

    Orji said both arms of government must avoid any acts that could be detrimental to the common pursuit of the goal of providing democratic dividends to Nigerians.

    “The important thing now is to promote and protect the factors that project national unity because no one knows it all.”

    “The brewing impasse existing between the executive and legislature can be played down since it is not in the interest of the generality of the people we represent who are concerned with making ends meet at the moment.

    “Nothing can be better than peaceful resolution of misunderstanding particularly when it has to do with two essential arms of government such as executive and legislature.

    “It has become pertinent that we thread with care in order not to attract unnecessary attention from the international community as well as our local populace.”