Tag: power sector

  • Power sector problem: Cash not gas shortage

    Power sector problem: Cash not gas shortage

    Mr. Bolaji Osunsanya is the Managing Director of Oando Gas and Power Limited. In this interview with EMEKA UGWUANYI, he speaks on issues in Nigeria’s energy sector, what the company is doing, its short to long term programmes in and outside Nigeria to make gas available to commercial and industrial concerns, among others. He says the central problem of the power sector is lack of cash.

    The industry has witnessed low oil price in the last two years, how has this affected Nigeria’s oil and gas industry, and Oando Gas & Power in particular?
    Oando Gas and Power is on the gas side, so the declining oil price has affected it, even though not directly. It has affected it with a lag because as the associated gas is not coming, gas is invariably also not coming. So, we have had supply dislocations but not so much about price. Prices have not moved much because we are running a pricing regime that does not directly relate to the oil prices. It was a bit more cost-reflective regime to make all the members of the whole value chain move. We have moved gas locally from at least 75 cents in the early days to as high as $3 per 1000 scf. So, we had a stable regime in that regard. The only challenge we had was the dislocation that came about from the low gas prices and the restiveness that we saw.
    The power sector and industrial concerns don’t have access to gas supply despite the domestic gas supply obligation oil firms undertook, what is the way out?
    Two things are involved. If the application is for power, the first thing to be done is to create liquidity in the power space because there is no need bringing out gas if it will be consumed by somebody who the supplier cannot collect his money or who cannot pay on time. My advice is that more work needs to be done in the power reform space before we start looking at gas. We have proven that at the right price of between $2.50 and $3 per 1000 scf, gas will be available for willing power plants. There is a dislocation when you are looking for prices that are not cost-reflective. So, there is no plant that says to us that they will pay $3 or $4 that we will not wheel gas to. That is the truth; it is the illiquidity of the power sector that we need to make the focus first. If we will ask for efficiencies, an increase in tariff to reflect the alternative cost of fuels, I think that’s what we need to do. There is no need to be dancing around the issue. Today at N32 per kilowatt/hour (kwh), it is clear that the whole thing cannot hold, so we must take some tariff adjustments in the short term, encourage everybody to bring in gas to power, into the space and equilibrium will set in thereafter. Fix the power sector and gas will follow suit.
    Gas is the fuel of the future, how will Nigeria tap into it in view of its huge gas reserves in alignment with global expectations?
    When they say gas is the fuel of the future, it is certainly not the only fuel but it is the most prominent, efficient and most cost-effective fuel. This is probably what they say, and they think it would be a big part of the energy mix globally. By that they mean that about 40 per cent of your energy will come from gas and Nigeria being one that sits atop a lot of reserves, it is the expectation that we would be the first in that queue and the first to take advantage of that manifest. But the point to make is that gas as a resource must be explored, exploited, cleaned, transferred before it gets to the market. It is a chain and all that chain must be provided for. The ultimate is yields for the gas, whether it is for power or industries. Today, industry works because we have been able to sell gas to them at $7 and it is more than enough to incentivise everybody in the team. That is why we have not had any issues in the industrial segment but if you think that power in Nigeria is 70 per cent of that consumption, that is where the work is and we have to fix power to operate like an industry and gas will flow and will be paid for. And everybody will have it and we will be able to use it to achieve what we see in gas being the future, the propeller of industries, propeller of energy, and utilisation of choice. That’s where we need to go.
    When you say fix power first, what do you mean?
    Today, that value chain is illiquid; today, there is no assurance that the electricity distribution company (DisCo) will pay the electricity generation company (GenCo) and the GenCo will pay the gas supplier. There is no assurance. NBET pays six per cent of its invoices that will not go anywhere, you can almost predict that to fall down flat soon. I even wonder how the GenCos do it. They borrowed money to buy those plants. By now, they should be defaulting in those loans because 26 per cent of your collections cannot pay your loans, it cannot even service the interests. It is illiquid, it is not sustainable, therefore, we must fix it. A school of thought said, go back to the populace to pay more, let them go back to fix the inefficiencies that exist but is not a very strong argument. The stronger argument for me is let us pay the super profits first, pay the right tariff and let the market finally get an equilibrium and it will come down. I always give the GSM analogy as an example. When the mobile telephone first came, I struggled to pay over N100,000 but it was difficult but now they even give you SIM cards free. Let the tariff find its level and come down by itself. We are already paying the price by using petrol to generate power. It is the most expensive way to generate power even if it’s “I pass my neighbour” that you are using. So, if we take a tariff increase, force efficiency through, then we will be charting our way to stable power supply.
    How far has Oando Gas and Power (OGP) gone with the attainment of its short to long term plans and strategies?
    It is my pleasure to share the developments of our brand, and share our ongoing projects and our long term plans as a company. It is on record that Oando Gas and Power has been a foremost developer of gas infrastructure in Nigeria. We have to our name over 260 kilometres of pipeline built over the last 15 years. No other company comes close to that record and we have plans to even do more. We are certainly the pioneer developer of gas infrastructure, and not just gas infrastructure but gas solutions across Nigeria. We pride ourselves as portfolio developers. By portfolio developers, we move into assets, and exit from assets. About this time two years ago, we were talking about our captive power plants. I’m pleased to say we have agreed to divest from those power plants and will be moving the investments to much bigger footprints in the power space as we also expand our gas infrastructure plane. Today we have our footprints, largely Gaslink, which continues to grow. We only recently completed Greater Lagos IV, so now we have the pipeline from Ijora all the way to Bonny Camp. What that means is that we have crossed the Eko Bridge, the Cowrie Creek water channel, and we have our flange just in front of Bonny Camp. It means now that we can go over and beyond the 175 customer that we sell gas to, and can now continue to sell to people on the Marina. There are many stations in Marina that will be hoping to improve their energy source. Now that we have the pipeline solidly there, we will able to do that for them.
    We have continued to grow our business in Port Harcourt with the Trans Amadi grid. We are expanding that now with a 9km addition that will take us to the port area. Our primary target there will be the BUA sugar refinery, which will be a big consumer of gas. But more importantly, we are trying to expand the Rivers State grid not just to Trans Amadi but to the entire emergent industrial clusters in Rivers State. It will see us go to Chioba, Obagua and all the developing parts of Port Harcourt. The idea is that the grid in Port Harcourt will be akin to the grid in Lagos and it will be our intention to continue to do this in all the emergent cities in Nigeria. We want to establish ourselves as the foremost last man distributor of gas. It will be our vision and aspiration to take gas to all crannies of Nigeria. Two years ago I also talked about our experiments in virtual pipeline space. We have just completed the building of our compressed natural gas facility in Ilasamaja. The plant is fully operational and currently all the capacities have been sold and we are working hard on the logistics to truck this gas to the consumers. We currently dispatch well in excess of 16 trucks daily from that facility and they get as far as Ife and we cover Ilesha, Ibadan, and big customers who have industrial concerns that are far from the pipeline grid. It is our intention to take that even further but so far we have sold the capacity of the gas network services at Ilasamaja and will be looking at other virtual pipeline projects going forward.
    OGP, it was learnt, had a deal with Helios, can you talk on the transaction?
    We only recently brought in Helios – private equity fund – into our company. They hold majority shareholding in Oando Gas and Power today. Helios investment partners own 49 per cent of Oando Gas and Power. Two per cent is owned by a nominee of Helios and the remaining 49 percent is held by Oando Plc. In terms of touch and feel, it continues to be an Oando company but is largely invested by Helios. Helios is a big African based infrastructure fund. It has in the last few years raised over $3billion worldwide. They have a big retinue of partners that they constantly invest in their fund and we have been able to make a deal with them to sell part of Oando Gas and Power for $115 million. With that amount, Helios is the biggest shareholder in Oando Gas and Power. They have invested in us but we retained management, therefore, I will continue to be the CEO, the whole team is still intact as you knew it. Nothing has changed on the management side but certainly things have changed on the investor side. The good thing about Helios is that they are in two good worlds. We carry the benefits of our legacy ‘Oando’ and we then complement that with a very deep pocketed fund. It creates new growth areas for us. All the constraints in the infrastructure space that we suffered because the Group was looking at many other things, I think have been solved. Today, we are able to look at those projects knowing fully well that we have the backing of somebody who has a deep pocket in infrastructure fund not just for the fund but for the fact that they are focused on infrastructure and they have a very long term pricing. We are today getting capital that fits with the mix of what we are supposed to do in the gas infrastructure space. We are pleased at this, and at the right time we will be making the right announcements. Helios was also an investor in the downstream business with Oando. Oando is used to Helios being co-partners. They were investors in marketing with Vitol. It was Vitol and Helios investing in the downstream but in this case, it is Helios alone investing in Oando Gas and Power.
    Things have been growing but of late, particularly, in the last one year, we suffered some supply security challenges. It is related to the challenges that we have had as a nation with people blowing up gas infrastructure and pipelines. It has taken a toll on our supplies and it has also aggravated the need for us to look at alternative supply sources. We will continue to do that going forward. We are working with other third parties to see if we can sign willing buyer willing seller gas supply contracts. We are also looking at other alternative ways of bringing gas other than the pipeline. So, our mini LNG project and our FSRU (floating storage re-gasification unit) project would help us at least create alternatives and help in bringing gas to Lagos and other parts where we do business. So, there is a big part of our medium term plan that will be aimed at developing the virtual pipeline project. We have already announced that we are starting a mini LNG project in Ajaokuta but we are doing that in conjunction with the Nigerian Gas Company. It will be a 20 million standard cubic feet per a day (scf/d) gas plant and we expect by the end of the year, that development will be complete. We are currently working with our partners to do the front end engineering work. We hope to start construction in the next quarter. We will also be working on an FSRU project and for that we working with Helios and a German gas company but we will be looking at LNG boats into parts of Lagos, not just Lagos but West Africa to bring LNG into markets. That will help us diversify our concentration on gas only coming from the Niger Delta. We will continue to keep alive our gas processing aspiration. We have opportunities now not so much the way it was conceived when we talked about the central franchise area, but in specific cases where we will be doing gas processing for specific clients. We are looking at not less than 300mscfd gas processing facility somewhere in the south central.
    The big part of all of this is to create an appropriate financing strategy. Gas infrastructure is not something we can do organically when we are just reserving our profits. It will be too slow and will not take the land grab advantage. It is now clear we have to partner with people that have capital to have our programme going. That is what we have done by bringing Helios into the programme and Helios will take us to the other partners. So, we will be embarking on road shows to raise a significant capital at least a billion dollars in the first instance to get into this programme as we go along. It continues to be our aspiration that we will expand our last man infrastructure looking at those regional markets, and I told you we wanted to do reticulation in Benin, Togo and Ghana. It is time now and I think the opportunity is ripe. Their economies are opening and their affordability for gas and interconnected infrastructure is ready. The alternative energy sources are more expensive. I think the time now is ripe to go into those markets. In the next few weeks, I think we will be making a significant announcement of the gas supply contract into one of the regions. We are pushing that actively, we have created a team within our business development platform to face that region squarely.
    In the very short term, I think it is important for us to increase the volume of gas that passes through our system. We intend to raise it to 70mscfd coming from as low as 47mscfd in 2016. So we are looking for 25 per cent growth in the coming year. We will complete the two projects we have on hand in the Greater Lagos IV that I mentioned, that will be up for commissioning any time soon and the Central Horizon in Port Harcourt, the expansion of the first 9km will be commissioned by the Governor by the middle of next month. We will take final investment decision on the construction of the Ajaokuta 20 mscf/d mini LNG facility and construction will commence in that quarter and there is a good chance that by first quarter of 2018, that plant should be operational.
    In doing all these, did you take cognisance of the security situation and where should the gas come from?
    The gas will come from multiple sources. There is a possibility that it will come from the Nigeria Liquefied Natural Gas Limited (NLNG). But there is also a further possibility that it will be imported. The price benchmarks are the same, so there is no obvious advantage buying it from Bonny or from buying it internationally. We have diversified sources. There are spot cargoes floating everywhere just like NLNG also has spot cargoes floating. They have multiple sources for bringing gas. As you know, every gas trader is a potential supplier. Vitol, Trafigura and Geogas, they all have gas at any point in time and because the price is the basis, price is almost exactly the same, so where you get it doesn’t matter much. It is a commodity but there is also a preference to look at NLNG more from the logistics and the quickness of the turnaround. Like I said it is a commodity and we can go anywhere. About security, it is similar and almost equivalent to maritime security and today I think there are vessels that come in with little or no issues. I think there will be no significant issue importing LNG to any part of Nigeria. Since this is our business we will pay some special attention to ensuring that the vessels have safe entries into the ports and to their destinations.
    On the virtual pipeline, do you have the right infrastructure to ensure its workability because you need good roads, among others, to make it work?
    Virtual pipeline is an alternative way of carrying the same gas other than through the pipeline. So, it is not a big one as such and the options will include rail, road and even barges. All you are doing is transforming the same gas to a state either compressed or liquefied and try to use alternative transportation means to move them to the market. It is similar to what we are already doing. Currently, we compress gas in Ilasamaja, we wheel or transport it by road to as far as Nigerian Breweries in Ibadan. It is a 120km-130 km turnaround and we go there four to five times a day because of the utilisation. So, it is what we are accustomed to. There are challenges and logistics problems in transporting not from safety perspective but just to share logistics and the roads and I think that is where the strength of Oando being behind us comes into play. Oando will dispatch easily 800 to 1000 trucks at the peak of things every day. So, we have significant experience in logistics to deploy the technology and we have transport companies that partner with us. These are transport companies that have 200 to 300 trucks in their fleet. They know all the nuances of this business. We will ask them to also help us move gas.
    I noticed that your West African reach stopped at where we have West African Gas Pipeline facility. Do you intend to key into the facility and did you consider the re-gasification facility in those areas as you are dealing with virtual pipelines. What is also the cost of the mini-LNG project?
    Our aspiration goes beyond the three terminal points of WAGP. I started with those countries and cities because those are the countries we are looking at reticulating pipelines on the back of WAGP but as we go into the FRSU and LNG programmes, we will reach out to Senegal, Gambia and everybody on the region provided they have gas need. So we are not limited to the terminal points of WAPG. The floating storage and regasification unit is exactly what you have in mind, we will float LNG there and there will be module that will re-gasify it and we put it into a truck and then put it into a pipeline, and that is the overall model. Today, already we have with the bulk call and terminal company in Tema, Ghana, the right to do this in Tema. So as I speak we are redesigning Tema to take a pipeline that will be fed by both WAPG and by an FSRU when we eventually get there. The strategy generally given our experience here is never going to a market with one source, we have a diversified source that at least gives you almost 100 per cent availability. We will cover more than those three countries and those four cities. In terms of programmes, I gave a broad growth and that we are trying to raise a billion dollars as a company. And just to give you a fling of the cost, a mini-LNG programme will cost you about $50 million for a 20mscfd project. FRSU on the other hand will cost you about $300 million to $500 million depending on what the logistics requirements are. For instance, you need to do break water as part of your berthing arrangement for the vessel but that is very expensive. But for a plug and play as we are thinking in Tema and a location in Lagos, it will be about $300 million for the project.
    These OGP projects and strategies, what will be their impact on ensuring the nation’s energy security, and secondly don’t you think Helios investments in Oando are getting too much?
    Let me answer the last one first. Helios has raised over $3 billion and has done deals all over Africa, so they have a diversified portfolio. Nigeria is a big part of that portfolio. In Nigeria they have done a lot of deals. About 43 to 44 per cent of that portfolio was invested in Nigeria. In Nigeria they have done telecoms, downstream, exploration and production and they have only recently done fast moving consumer products. They have a diversified portfolio and I don’t think they are taking more than they can chew. They have about $1.6 billion invested in Nigeria, $115 million in OGP and about $200 million in the downstream, I don’t think that is a big part of their portfolio, so it will be too early to talk about them being overinvested. Central to energy security is the fact we need an energy mix that is not concentrated. It cannot be all about thermal plants. We must have a good energy mix as a country, so that even if there are dislocations, the other fuels will be compensating and I think that’s what we are pushing. We push gas and there are people pushing coal, nuclear, solar and other renewable. The most important thing is we have diversified energy mix. The more diversified our energy mix the more secure we will be.
    What informed your divestment from the captive or small power plants at a time the government seeks more investments in the power sector, does it mean that it is not viable to invest in the sector or are you having challenges?
    We see the sector as viable but don’t forget that when we did the captive power, we were doing it as a demonstration project. Two years ago, the power sector for us at a time was not clear. It was good that we did our power investment with bilateral counterparts that we could do business with. We found that window with Lagos State and we did our quoting and I think we demonstrated with 13Mw and that was what was possible in the power space. It will continue to be with the private sector because even the divestment was still with the private sector. What we did is that we just divested that investment and our intention was to put it in power but on a bigger scale and I think in the last three years also the power reform is trying to play out well. There are still challenges but it is better than what was obtainable three years ago. For the embedded, I think we can do some sizeable power plants. You will see our announcements with the two distribution companies (DisCos) in Lagos. We are trying to do something that will be significant and bigger. Those power plants we sold, I think we had 23Mw in Iju but our next announcements will be 50Mw and more.
    How will OGP raise the $1billion especially now banks are constrained and what do you intend to do with the $115million from divested interests in OGP?
    The $115 million that was paid by Helios was paid to Oando Plc, the owners of OGP. It was a share transaction. Oando Plc sold shares to Helios and retained some in OGP, so the $115 million has nothing to do with the $1 billion and the new budget. That was a share deal between Oando Plc and Helios. They have their own plans and issues to solve with the $115 million. The $1 billion we are talking about is what we think will be the requirement for the projects we scoped and it is our own equity requirement in those projects. We will need more than a billion dollars but as you know, so far we have raised about $400 million as OGP in the projects that we have done. A lot of these we have raised as project financing. We put the deal together, we go the bank and they give us money to implement. The scheme will still be similar but because of the scale of what we want to do, we want to be able to at least raise a billion dollar as our own equity and leverage that to about $3-$4 billion. If we do a central processing facility (CPF) of 600mscfd that will require a lot of money, so we are just creating capital for ourselves now and to be equity in those bills as we go forward. We need to be able to reach international funds to partner with us on this project. That is more reason we partnered with Helios. The fact that Helios is there means that we will be open to most of the development finance institutions (DFIs). Don’t forget it is the same institutions that put money in the funds, I see will put money in Helios. These are the same people we will fall back on to put in our own $1 billion to do the project. But because we are also part of their system they would have taken us through the mechanisms to get into that money easily. So that is the strategic side to why we did the deal with a private equity fund to prepare ourselves for that capital risk. The $1 billion is a benchmark. There will be a number of bourses. A lot of it will not be local because we have exhausted what is local. We have taken all that we think that can be taken locally and now know the capital raise will have to be foreign. We are preparing our platform to start to go there. In May, we are going on road show with Helios to see those partners to raise money for the projects we want to do.

  • Fashola re-states FG’s commitment to stabilise issues in power sector

    Fashola re-states FG’s commitment to stabilise issues in power sector

    The Minister of Power, Works and Housing, Mr Babatunde Fashola,  has said that the  Federal Government is committed to formulating policies to address the liquidity issues in the power  sector.

    Fashola gave the government position in a communiqué issued at the end of power sector operators meeting in Osogbo on Monday.

    He said one of such government policies was the Power Sector Payment Assurance Guarantee, designed to ensure the payment of services rendered by the electricity generating companies in the country.

    According to him, the policy will ultimately bring about stability of liquidity in the sector.

    Fashola said it was important that all stakeholders remained committed to their various roles of supplying and distributing power to ensure effectiveness of the sector.

    The minister said the purpose of the Nigerian Electricity Supply Industry (NESI) was to ensure that citizens had access to safe and reliable power.

    Gov. Rauf Aregbesola of Osun also acknowledged the gradual improvement of electricity supply, especially in the state.

    He said that the importance of the Power Sector Recovery Plan was critical to ensuring accountability for losses, improvement of customer service, customer accessibility, safety, and performance in the sector.

    Aregbesola urged electricity customers to play their role in the success of the industry through the timely payment of bills.

    He said it was important to end  vandalism of power assets, and the constant assault  on electricity workers

  • Why we play big in power sector, by UBA GCFO

    Why we play big in power sector, by UBA GCFO

    United Bank for Africa Plc has explained its huge funding plans to the power, oil and gas sectors of the economy.
    Speaking at a media parley at the weekend, It’s Group Chief Finance Officer (GCFO), Ugo Nwaghodoh, said the lender, which recorded Group gross revenues of N384 billion and N90.6 billion Profit Before Tax (PBT) in its 2016 financial result, prioritises funding to sectors with biggest impact on customers’ businesses and economy.
    He said the lender positioned its credit portfolio across geography, industrial sector and limits. “There are sectors we do not play at all as matter of policy. We are very strong in oil and gas and our portfolio in this sector is about the largest. We are also strong in agriculture. We also have a healthy portfolio in power and manufacturing and space,” he said.
    Nwaghodoh added: “We lend to power sector because we believe that if power is gotten rightly, manufacturing base of the country will improve. We also believe that if the country gets power right, even our own business will be better. We do business with the mindset of promoting the economy.”
    The GCFO commended the performance of the bank, despite the ongoing economic recession in the country, adding that its subsidiaries in key African countries played key roles in the performance.
    He said the bank is currently reaping from diversification efforts in many African countries. “UBA Africa today contributes a third in both revenues and profit of UBA Group. Our Ghanaian operation can stand side by side of some of the banks in Nigeria today in profit contributions,” he disclosed.
    “In Africa, the International Monetary Fund sees significant growth in this current year and many of the African markets. Gross Domestic Product growth is forecast at six per cent in Kenya, Tanzania and 5.5 per cent in Uganda. With this type of growth, financial services industry is well positioned to support the market and make a lot of profit from these economies”.
    He said UBA was upbeat about African business and believed that with what it is doing in the continent, it should be able to achieve more as a group, in the years ahead.
    “We are supporting key sector of African economies. So, there are markets where we are supporting significant businesses in oil and gas, infrastructure and agriculture. Some of these markets are commodity-rich countries, and are agriculture-rich countries and these are the key drivers in those economies. We always ensure that we play prominently in key sectors of every economy where we operate,” he said.
    Explaining further, he said if a bank is not playing in the agriculture space in Burkina Faso, such lender is obviously not going to do a substantial business in that country. “Burkina Faso is one of the world’s largest exporters of cotton. If you do not play in the key sector and support the cotton campaign, you cannot be strong in that country. We are also introducing electronic banking solutions in some of these markets. We are driving financial inclusion and helping to develop electronic payment space and these are helping the growth of our business in Africa,” he said.
    He continued: “A lot of the growth we recorded in 2016 mainly came from interest income, and non-interest income. We saw a lot of growth in our assets and improvements in earning assets yields. Our improvements in yields came from better treasury rates, and loan pricing. They helped to improve our net interest margin and income, within the period,” he said.
    He added: “In our non-interest income, we will continue to improve our transaction volume, and play significantly in electronic banking operations by improving on the channels of transaction. We also want to reach our customers through different channels. We are pioneering the move away from brick and mortal banking and focusing on moving with the times.”
    Head, Investor Relations, UBA, Abiola Rasaq, said the bank’s business plan was centred around the Africa, which is key to its business strategy. He said the bank was positioned to compete and provide solutions that would enable it win in the digital banking space. “Competition is intensifying towards the digital space. We have more than five million cards and that is adding to our digital platform,” he said.

  • ‘Why power sector’s growth is stunted’

    ‘Why power sector’s growth is stunted’

    A combination of factors, including lack of funding, incompetence and inconsistent government policies, have been blamed for the stunted growth of the power sector.

    The sector generates barely 3,000 megawatts (Mw) of electricity to a population of about  180million. This development has further affected power supply in the country and compounded  its unemployment.

    The government is experiencing policy somersaults, which has made it difficult for the industry to have a clear-cut agenda in maximising its potential for growth, it was learnt.

    It was further learnt that the government has, in recent times, tried to assemble a crop of technocrats and engineers to make the industry have a sense of direction and boost its production, but this has not helped the situation.

    A former Executive Director, National Independent Power Projects (NIPPs), Dr Albert Okorogu, said the electricity industry was facing crisis, because there were no quality policies.

    Speaking with The Nation  in Lagos, Okorogu said people who have the right skills, passions and motivations for the industry do not have the opportunity to lead the sector, lamenting that lack of skilled manpower has been a huge challenge in the sector.

    He said the government alone cannot provide the funds required to grow the sector, and should therefore seek investors within and outside the country, in order to move the industry forward.

    Okorogu said: ‘’The Federal Government does not have the resources to deliver enough electricity, improve the distribution and transmission channels in the country. The costs are of providing these facilities are enormous, because it runs into trillions of dollars. That is the reason why private local and foreign investors have to come in to assist the industry.’’

  • BPE seeks non-interference for power sector regulation

    BPE seeks non-interference for power sector regulation

    For the power privatization in the country  to work, the industry’s regulator- Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission (NERC) must be allowed to perform its mandate without interference, the Acting Director-General of the Bureau of Public Enterprises (BPE), Dr. Vincent Onome Akpotaire, has said.

    Speaking at a 2-day stakeholders interactive dialogue/workshop organized by the joint committees of the National Assembly on Power in Abuja on Wednesday, February 8, 2017, Akpotaire said that NERC must be allowed to fix tariffs in line with the Electric Power Sector Reform Act (EPSRA) without interference from any quarters and that if the tariffs are considered high, the government could decide to mitigate the effects by taking up a percentage of the tariffs instead of outright cancellation.

    The Acting Director-General cautioned against the blame-game in the power sector and appealed to  the executive and the legislative arms of the government as well as other stakeholders to  come together  to find solutions to the sector’s challenges.

    Explaining why the Federal Government is being asked to subsidize the Nigeria Electric Supply Industry (NESI), the BPE helmsman said that the loss levels at the point of privatistion of the power sector, that is the Aggregate Technical, Commercial and Collection (ATC &C) loss of Nigeria was about 50% on the average which could not be fully passed to consumers immediately to avoid rate shock and consumer rebellion.

    On why the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) gave a loan of N213 billion to the privatized power companies, he said that the  “Multi-Year Tariff Order 2 (2012) that was put in place when investors took over on November 1, 2013, had assumed AT & C loss level of 25 %.The agreements signed with the investors gave NERC and the Distribution Companies (DISCOs) one year to determine the true AT & C loss levels which was subsequently found to be about  50% on the average. Based on the new ATC & C loss levels, a new tariff was issued by NERC with  effect from February 2015 but the shortfall that accumulated because of the wrongly assumed ATC & C of 25% from November 1, 2013 to December 31, 2014 amounted to N213 billion. Consumers were liable to pay the N213 billion immediately but the CBN intervention by way of a loan to the DISCOs, enabled NERC to spread the recovery of the money from the consumers over a ten year period.”

    Expatiating on why the core investors in the DISCOs were not investing heavily in line with the covenants they signed with the government, he said the transaction structure compelled investors to raise money and pay for their 60% equity in DISCOs using their own balance sheet and that upon take over, the investors were expected to leverage on the acquired companies’ clean balance sheets to raise additional funds for investments. However, he pointed out that financial institutions have refused to lend money to the DISCOs until a cost reflective tariff is approved in line with the agreements; and the CBN loan to the industry removed from the books of the DISCOs.

    Akpotaire said,  though,  the Federal Government owns 40% of the DISCOs, it was not part of the management because it was not funding its shares on the boards.” The Performance Agreement executed with investors has assigned operational risks to investors. The PA provides that a core investor who fails to achieve agreed targets stands the risk of losing his/her equity at the payment of US$1 by the Federal Government.”

    On why the BPE is on the boards of the power companies, the Acting Director-General explained that “since 1988 when TCPC, the agency that BPE replaced, was established, BPE has always represented the Federal Government on the board of any company undergoing reform and privatization”  on the grounds that it makes it possible for the BPE to have access to all the information it requires to carry out its statutory duties of reform and privatization and “since all key strategic decisions are made by the board, it would not make sense for BPE to give guarantees on behalf of a company it does not know the critical decisions that its boards had taken. The initial five-year period is usually a time to help nurture the companies on the path of growth and success.”

  • Saraki, Dogara query N2.7tr spent on power sector without result

    Saraki, Dogara query N2.7tr spent on power sector without result

    Senate President Bukola Saraki and House of Representatives Speaker Yakubu Dogara have queried the N2.74 trillion spent on power sector between 1999 and 2015, lamenting that its services depreciated in spite of the deployed funds.
    They spoke yesterday at a two-day stakeholders’ “Interactive Dialogue/Workshop on the Nigerian Power Sector” organised by the National Assembly in Abuja.
    Dogara said the challenges faced by the sector called for concerted efforts by stakeholders in addressing them.
    “Perhaps the most important question is what happened to the N2.74 trillion spent on the sector from 1999-2015. Why is it that the more we spent on the power sector, the more darkness we attract,” he queried.
    The Speaker said the workshop was organised with the aim of changing the epileptic power supply situation through a holistic diagnosis of the challenges.
    “It is important we solve the challenges impeding the development of the Nigerian Electricity Supply Industry (NESI) and proffer practical solutions.
    “These challenges run across the entire power value chain of Generation, Transmission and Distribution.
    “The myriad issues are apparently exacerbated by inadequate funding, poor energy mix, fuel supply issues, flawed regulatory framework and commercial issues, among others.
    “There is, therefore, a need for concerted efforts by all stakeholders to address these myriad problems,” he said.
    Dogara urged the participants to find solutions that would lead to the repositioning of the power sector for effective service delivery.
    Speaker queried why power generation remained within 5000 megawatts in the last 56 years.
    “Why have various policies by successive governments failed? Why has the transmission infrastructure remained inadequate in wheeling the available power? How can the Federal Government rapidly expand the transmission infrastructure?
    “Why are electric meters not available to most consumers, thereby leading to contentious estimated billing?” he said.
    Saraki noted that the problems facing power sector were made as a result of fraudulent tendency and ignorance.
    He, therefore, said sacrifices should be made to address the issues, decrying that during privatisation of the sector, licences and others incentives were sold to people who had no knowledge of the business.
    “We must be blunt and we must accept mistakes, sacrifices must be made; some of the problems are fraudulently, ignorantly and intentionally made.”
    Minister of Works, Power and Housing Babatunde Fashola said electricity was not cheap, calling for commiserate tariff to be put into consideration.
    He appealed to the National Assembly leadership to enact laws that would give stiffer punishment to those tampering with power installations, especially in the area of vandalism.
    Fashola said about 3,000 megawatts of power had been de-commissioned as a result of vandalism.
    “The bills that are sent to National Assembly should be given appropriate attention so that they can be made into law.
    “There should be amendment of laws to ensure that there are stiffer punishments meted out to those who tempered with power,’’ he said.
    Chairman, Senate Committee on Power, Steel Development and Metallurgy Senator Enyinnaya Abaribe stated that the problems in power supply had remained, even with efforts of successive governments.
    According to him, there is capacity, but no power.
    In his keynote address, Chairman of Heirs Holding Tony Elumelu said: “We must fix power to fix Nigeria. If we do not fix power, every other thing remains an illusion.”
    He explained that there would be challenges the nation might face if the power sector was not fixed.
    Elumelu insisted that stakeholders, including the judiciary, the private sector and power regulators, must play a role to address the issue of power.
    He advised leaders to stop the blame-game, adding that knowledgeable people should be put in the power sector and not using quota system.
    “Let’s look for Nigerians who have track records.”
    The Vice President, Prof. Yemi Osinbajo, represented by the Managing Director, Niger Delta Holding, Mr. Chiedu Ugbo, said the Federal Government was working to improve the power sector.

  • Review power sector privatisation, Buhari urged

    Review power sector privatisation, Buhari urged

    President Muhammadu Buhari has been advised to review the privatisation of the power sector so that the country could leverage on a vibrant real sector to exit recession and drive Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth.
    The National Union of Textile Garment and Tailoring Workers of Nigeria immediate past president, Comrade Oladele Hunsu, gave the advice in Lagos at the weekend.
    He argued that only a transparent review of the exercise to unmask those who bought the unbundled assets of the defunct Power Holding Company of Nigeria (PHCN) in 2013 and their capacities would resolve the crisis in the sector that has remained a pain in the neck of real sector operators and stunted the nation’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth.
    Hunsu, who described the privatisation as “shoddy and fraudulent,” said more than three years after PHCN’s assets were handed over to private investors, there had not been any significant improvement in electricity supply.
    He lamented that rather than improve, electricity supply has continued to drop.
    “Nigeria was generating more than 4,000 megawatts (Mw) of electricity before privatisation in 2013. Today, electricity generation capacity is wobbling between 2,000Mw and 3,500 Mw in a country with a population of over 170 million. It’s high time we reviewed the privatisation.
    “We need to investigate how those electricity distribution and generating companies (DisCos) and (GenCos) were sold and who bought them,” he said.
    He noted that several electricity consumers were yet to be metered years after the privatisation, adding that this underscored the abysmal performance of the sector.
    While describing the private investors’failure to meter all consumers as illegal, Hunsu accused the Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission (NERC) of failing to properly regulate the industry.
    Besides, he said it is only in Nigeria that the government will hand over public funds to private investors as soft loans or bailouts to enable them run supposedly privatised entities.
    The Federal Government had in November 2013 unbundled PHCN into 18 successor firms and, subsequently, handed them over to private investors. The exercise was expected to set the stage for a major transformation of the sector to guarantee uninterrupted electricity supply to the manufacturing sector and Nigerians in general.
    But more than three years after, Hunsu regretted that this has not happened. According to him, the private investors have failed to meet most of the Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) given to them during the purchase by the government through the Bureau of Public Enterprises (BPE), which mid-wifed the sale of the power assets.
    Earlier, the Minister of Power, Works and Housing, BabatundeFashola (SAN), said the privatisation would not be reviewed.
    The minister, who spoke in Lagos, said the ministry would remain committed to the terms of power generation and distribution contracts it inherited, noting that the government would only listen to people calling for revisit if the aim was to open up opportunities for more investments in GenCos and DisCos.

  • ‘How to fix power sector’

    ‘How to fix power sector’

    To fix the problems of the power sector, the Federal Government should strengthen its regulatory frameworks, assist the power distribution companies (DisCos) to recover the N100billion debts owed them by the Ministries, Departments and Agencies (MDAs), and criminalise electricity theft and vandalism, a former Assistant General Manager, Power Holding Company of Nigeria (PHCN), Toba Adebayo, has said.

    Other measures, he said, include monitoring of investors, who bought the assets of the (PHCN, investing in transmission to wheel power to the consumers, partnering the power firms to provide cost-effective tarrif and building a strong electricity market in the country.

    He said the sector was facing problems that required urgent attention from the government and other stakeholders in the value chain.

    Adebayo, in a paper titled: Post privatisation issues and the need for urgent solution and made available to The Nation, said the sector has since 2013 when it was privatised, been battling problems such as funding, obsolete networks, transformer lines and cables, among others.

    He said the government and investors were responsible for the problems in the sector, and should proffer solutions to them.

    He urged the government to  roll out policies that would make the Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission (NERC) to be alive to its responsibilities, and provide sanction for infractions

    He said the DisCos were unable to recover their debts, because they lacked the support of the government.

    Adebayo said: “Federal Government must put in place measures that would make the Ministries Departments and Agencies (MDAs) pay the debts owed the DisCos. The military and para-military agencies must pay for electricity services rendered to them, coupled with the fact that the government must be willing to discipline erring ones among them.’’

    On tarrif, he said the government needed to partner with the power generation companies (GenCos), power distribution companies (DisCos), gas suppliers, customers and other parties in order to arrive at a cost reflective tarrifs.

    He said the idea would enable the parties involved to review the tarrifs for the growth of the sector, when the needs arise.

    The power firms, he said, must meet deadlines on metering, adding that the development would enable them to measure consumption and get recover their debts.

    Adebayo, who is the Managing Director, Union Electrical Nigeria Limited, chided the government for the laxity in the sector, arguing that the issue was making investors to exercise unnecessary control.

    ‘’ The government sold 60 per cent equity to the investors, who bought PHCN, and retains 40 per cent shareholdings. But it appears as if the investors bought the sector 100 per cent from the Federal Government. The investors are enjoying too much liberty. The government must appoint desk officers in the offices that are owned by the investors, who bought PHCN, in order to get report on their operation.’’ he said.

    According to him, the government needed to invest in transmission to  satisfy the distribution firms.

    He advised the government to make stealing and destruction of electricity equipment a criminal offence to deter others from indulging in it.

  • ‘Corruption crippling power sector’

    ‘Corruption crippling power sector’

    There is high-level corruption among officials, customers and contractors of the electricity distribution companies (DisCos), The Nation has learnt.
    It was gathered that the workers, mainly those in the Engineering /Technical Units, connive with contractors to buy substandard equipment, such as sub-stations, transformers and wires.
    The contractors obtained fake local and foreign certification numbers to ensure that the transactions have some credibility. In other cases, they refurbish equipment.
    Sources said customers were made to pay below the market price for the equipment.
    Ikeja Electric Chief Financial Officer Mr Aigbe Olotu, who corroborated this, noted that corruption remained endemic.
    Speaking to The Nation, on the sideline of a forum in Lagos, Olotu said corruption could not be eradicated because the propensity of workers to cut corners.
    He said: ”Many Nigerians believe that they have suffered for long and that they cannot get anything done unless they steal or collect bribe. That informed the reason why corruption permeates every segment of the economy.”
    According to him, criminal activities, such as bribery, exhortation and others are increasing in the sector, because some workers allowed themselves to be used as accomplices to crimes.
    He said cases abound, where officials collect new transformers and install refurbished ones.
    The Executive Director, Association of Nigerian Electricity Distributors (ANED), Sunday Oduntan, said efforts were on-going to rid the sector of corruption.
    He said the 11 DisCos were prepared to deal with corruption, by ensuring that corrupt workers were investigated and brought to book.

  • N809.8b revenue shortfall cripples power sector

    The Electricity Distribution Companies (DisCos)under the auspices of Association of Nigerian Electricity Distributors (ANED) yesterday complained that the N809 billion current shortfall in the liquidity of the operators was inhibiting their operation.

    Addressing reporters in Abuja, its Executive Director, Mr. Sunday Oduntan, said “the figure of the shortfall now is N809.8 billion in the whole industry.”

    He described it “as the revenue that is accruable to the industry that is not there, stressing that the regulators in the sector are very inconsistent and perhaps inexperienced.

    He recalled that the Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission (NERC) fixed its tariff late December last year, but scheduled that the tariff should be effective on February 4 this year.

    This delay, according to him, caused a loss of N12.8 billion across the power sector value chain.

    He urged the government to give assurance on gas supply, and see to the possibility of selling to local consumers of gas in naira as ways of helping the sector.

    Oduntan said: “When you sell to me in dollar and I receive my money in naira, it cannot work. You should look at how best to factor these things such that at the end of the day, this thing will work. Not only selling in dollar, they are not selling at the rate recognised by the tariff. N197 is the allowed naira /dollar exchange in MYTO 2015. That means I am not allowed to sell my electricity based on the tariff computed on the basis of N197/$. So any increase in dollar is nobody’s business but my burden to carry.”

    He warned that if help fails to come to the sector,  the DisCos, transmission and generation sectors will all die.

    “Now the problem we have is that there is a lot of outstanding liabilities to be paid. We are owing NBET, we are owing market operators. We have been unable to pay. The huge shortfall does not encourage liquidity,” the ANED chief said.

    According to him, the operators cannot continue to run a system that does not allow the re-engineering of their balance sheet.

    He urged the government to make way for the recognition of shortfall in the electricity market.

    Oduntan called on the NERC to do the needful by making provision for a tariff that reflects the current reality in the market.

    According to him, since handover of the entities to private sector, several regulatory setbacks have hindered the DisCos from meeting their targets in the performance agreements.

    He called for an upward review of the N20 billion capita expenditure (CAPEX) limit that the Federal Government allowed the companies, stressing that it has tied the hands of the investors and hindered them from expanding their businesses.

    The implication of cap CAPEX, said Oduntun was  to avoid tariff shock. “If it is very high, tariff will be very high, if it is very low, tariff will be very low. But if you are looking at the reality in the market, while we are taking decisions on these things. Under the MYTO, I am only allowed to spend a certain amount-N20 billion, and that money is not enough.