Tag: President Goodluck Jonathan

  • Behind the ‘Chinese walls’

    Behind the ‘Chinese walls’

    Against the backdrop of President Goodluck Jonathan’s recent visit to China, Gboyega Alaka takes a look at the growing number of Chinese living in Nigeria and attempts to unravel the attraction of the world’s most populous people to Africa’s most populous nation.

    The first impression you get every time you attempt to strike a conversation or any form of interaction with a Chinese on a Lagos street is fear, and suspicion. And it does not really matter whether it’s in the Computer Village, the Chinese Village or in the comfort of their offices. Next, is a quick attempt at a get-away from the dark-skinned stranger, whose mission they very surely cannot trust. In most cases, they retreat into their shells and quicken their pace to match up with their Chinese brothers (they usually walk the streets in groups). And if by any stroke of luck you manage to surmount this hurdle and get them to give some calculated response, the next hurdle is the language barrier; this is as tall as the real Chinese Wall!

    Communication breakdown

    The language barrier is a bigger barrier that can make mincemeat of any success in the adventure. A good number of these Asians can hardly string a simple sentence of English together. At the Chinese Village in Ketu, Lagos, they make use of their Nigerian sales assistants and staff, who have managed to strike a conversational chord with them, to get along in transacting their businesses. This extends even to the formal sectors, where they have continued to grow in strength. The Chinese have huge interests in companies like StarTimes, CCECC, a construction firm, Tecno, Huawei, both technology and telecommunications firms, WAHUM, to mention a few. A ‘no speak English’ or ‘No sabi English’ response from them, therefore, usually marks a frustrating and disappointing ‘end of discussion.’

    The question is: since they can’t speak English, why do they continue to troop into Africa’s most populous country? Unlike what many may believe, China is not in any known economic distress. It is in fact the world’s leading economy at the moment.

    A cursory check shows that the number of oriental Asians, particularly the Chinese, has been on the increase, especially since the beginning of the new democracy. While an inability to speak English does not necessarily cast a question mark on their literacy status, it nevertheless raises a big question mark on their readiness to integrate.

    The tie that binds

    Interestingly, Nigeria and the People’s Republic of China first established diplomatic relations on February 10, 1971; but it wasn’t until the last two decades that the relationship grew, primarily because of international isolation and Western condemnation of the then Nigerian military regime. While it has also been said that the Chinese government’s foray into Nigeria is driven by an insatiable thirst for her oil (China has acquired a considerable chunk of Nigeria’s oil wells), her support to Nigeria in the area of economy, infrastructural development and military are prominent. Bilateral trade between both countries reached $3 billion in 2006, up from $384 million in 1998, culminating in two state visits by its former president, Hu Jintao. Both nations also signed a memorandum of understanding on establishing a strategic partnership, whilst China on its part has supported Nigeria’s bid for a seat in the U.N. Security Council. More recently, China also pledged to invest $267 million to help build the Lagos Lekki Free-trade Zone. According to the Heritage Foundation (China Global Investment Tracker Interactive, January 2012), China’s net investment in Nigeria reached $15.42 billion by 2012.

    With such huge investment, it is little wonder that her people have seemingly discovered a haven in Nigeria. In developing a solid relationship with one of Africa’s top three economies, it might be said that China is also opening up overseas market for its very buoyant production sector. But the relationship has not come without its sore points, as China has been accused of flooding the Nigerian market with cheap goods, especially textiles. Combined with the importation of second hand clothes from Europe, China’s action is said to be responsible for the closure of 65 textile mills and the laying-off of over 150,000 textile workers across the country.

    Aside their incursion into the formal sectors, such as construction, rail development, energy and telecommunications, the Chinese continue to be very visible even in retail trade and hospitality business, especially with their trade mark China-Towns and Chinese Villages and numerous hotels and restaurants.

    According to Shaohua, 25, who runs a clothing store in Chinese Village and also goes by the local name ‘Tunji’, “Chinese people like to go out of their country to do business and make money.” In his smattering English, he explains that his people are driven by an inherent mercantile nature. Shaohua, with a rich sense of humour, was the first Chinese to open up to being spoken to. Ostensibly, he was also in a good mood, as he was chatting and laughing with a couple of Nigerian sales-girls, who were equally having fun taunting him. Without any prodding, he volunteered in between dabbing at his bloodied nose, ‘Catarrh e too much for Nigeria.’ He has a wife and a kid back home in China, and has only been in Nigeria for two years. Of business, he says, “It is sometimes good, and sometimes bad.” On this wet afternoon, business seemed visibly low, as few people were seen moving from one shop to the other. He disclosed that the turnout of customers to the village can be very low every time it rains. He revealed proudly that he has also learnt to eat and enjoy Nigerian foods, such as potato, pepper-soup, fried rice and chicken, and corn. Well, he’s a bit familiar with corn, since it is also grown back home in China, and rice as well. Of Nigerian women, Shaohua thinks ‘they’re good.’ This, of course, he said after some furtive glances at the reporter.

    He was asked if he lives among Nigerians and if he patronised public transport? “Me enter bus go Oshodi,” was his gleeful response, choosing to begin with the latter question. He, however, said he does not live in town and cannot because of “thief plenty for Nigeria.” According to him, owning an apartment in town is too risky, as his house could be looted while he is at work. And so, he lives within the enclave of the Chinese Village and he is happy.

    The reason for the fear and suspicion is understood. According to one of the salesgirls, the rampant stories of kidnapping and robbery are some other reasons why the Chinese are afraid and prefer to keep to themselves. From Tony, a high school student, who has come to spend his holiday with his father, to the tall and seemingly recluse ‘Smokey Robbinson,’ who is just content with dragging at his cigarette, to Mr Li, who gladly declared himself a half-Chinese-half-Nigerian, and Gohl – a skinny young lad who is glad to announce that he has been to Abuja; it eventually turned out to be an adventure. There is also Sam and Wei, a pleasant Nigerian-Chinese couple, who run shop B10, Uncle Sam & Windy Store on the upper floor of the left wing of the Chinese Village.

    Like the Chinese, like the Igbo

    At the end of a full day in between the high walls of this Chinese enclave, what became really clear is the seeming resemblance of the Chinese to the Nigerian Igbo people. Like the Igbo, they are very industrious and will go to any length and any part of the world to do anything legitimate to make money. Also like the Igbo, they are not necessarily bothered by a quest for western education, and they have a deep passion for trading. Most importantly, they do not shy away from production. The Chinese are masters at fabricating popular products, a trait common amongst the Igbo. Whether it’s in core technology such as machinery and spare parts production or in fabric manufacturing, the Chinese are well at home. The good thing of course is that both groups are steadily improving, except of course the Chinese are way ahead, due largely to the support they enjoy from their home government.

    Also, age is no barrier for a Chinese when it comes to owning or running a business. Gohl, for instance, looked to be in his teenage years, but already he has made the long trip to Nigeria. He practically runs the big fabric shop in the ‘village;’ something you can only find amongst the Igbo in Nigeria. And to top it up, he has been to Abuja!

    As demonstrated by Wei, the Chinese half of the Nigerian-Chinese couple, if the Chinese can overcome the phobia of mixing with the locals, they have the ability to quickly learn the vocabulary of their host community. And this is another major similarity to the Igbo. It was thus a pleasant surprise to hear a Chinese woman utter with total fluency ‘e wole’ and ‘ki lefe,’ two Yoruba expressions for ‘Please come in’ and ‘what do you want?’

    The half-Chinese, half-Nigerian

    Mr. Li is in his early fifties and sells mainly children clothing. He’s been around since 2002, when the ever-bustling Awolowo Road China Town in Ikoyi used to be the beehive of Chinese-Nigerian trading activities, and declared gleefully that he is half-Chinese, half-Nigerian. He is at home with Nigerian foods – or so he thinks, since he eats potato, yam and corn. However, for someone who has spent over ten years in Lagos, his level of English competence appeared to be very low. He apparently has not mixed well enough, and the suspicion still lurks in his eyes. But Li does not think so. “By simply looking at Nigerians, I can tell whether they are Yoruba, Igbo or Hausa,” adding that he has remained in Nigeria for so long because he already feels some kind of brotherly attachment to the people. He laments that business has nose-dived in recent time, compared to the good old days on Awolowo Road.

    And as for Tony who has come to spend his high school holidays with his father, the attraction is the weather and the lure to see new lands. Tony will be going back to China soon, but promises to be back. Already, he seems to enjoy some level of popularity with the Nigerian girls in the complex, with whom he exchanged banters.

    An amazing Nigerian-Chinese couple

    Wei, a delightful Chinese lady, beckons customers to her shop with her seamless rendition of ‘E wole.’ Considering how herculean it was to find an English-speaking Chinese all-day, it was indeed like a jackpot meeting Wei. She is married to Samuel Musa, a Nigerian, since 2006. She announced proudly that she also speaks pidgin English, a smattering Igbo language and can exchange greetings in Hausa. Not just that. She is also a master in Nigerian culinary: “I cook egusi, okro, vegetable soup, stew and I also pound yam, prepare amala and semo.” They got legally married at the Ikoyi Registry in Lagos. Wei declared amidst smiles that her attraction to Sam was his openness. “He is different; he is straightforward and open, like Chinese men.”

    On his part, Sam, who hails from the Eggon tribe in Nasarawa State, said aside the wedding in Lagos, they also went to China to consummate the union with Wei’s people. He met her at the Awolowo Road China Town, through her sister, whom he used to patronise; fell in love with her and today they have two kids: a boy and a girl. As an in-law and as a businessman who trades in adult and children clothing, Sam revealed that he visits China regularly and confessed that the Chinese are indeed a very friendly people. “They welcome visitors a lot, but they don’t like to be cheated,” he said. Because he is married to one of them, Sam is well trusted amongst the Chinese in the complex and says he and Wei are sometimes called in to help with interpretation and other knotty issues. Wei, by the way, also speaks French.

    Language barrier and insecurity

    Explaining why they look restrained in mixing with Nigerians, Wei said, “You know, outside is not safe because of cases of armed robbery and all sorts of violence. And because most hardly speak English or know anyone, the tendency is for them to be afraid and feel insecure. So the Chinese Village provides them with that security, neighbourliness and rest of mind.”

    She observed that the Chinese cannot be compared to the Lebanese or Indians, who are more used to the system and speak English and French very well. Even as recently as two days before the reporter’s visit, the Immigration officials were at the complex in search of illegal immigrants.

    Sam added that the fear is not unfounded. Not too long ago, one of them was kidnapped. According to him, “Initially, some of them lived outside the complex, but when armed robbers attacked them, they returned to the village. Last year, a Chinese lady was viciously attacked by a customer, whom she had taken into her warehouse within the complex and over N300,000 was taken away from her. When you add these to the huge language barrier and the fact that they feel very vulnerable, then you will understand why most of them choose to live inside the village. Even most of those that work for several other Chinese companies outside the village, including the construction company, CCECC, live here.”

    Sam emphasised that most Chinese inability to speak English isn’t necessarily a mark of illiteracy. His wife Wei, for instance, is a graduate of Chemistry. “It’s not just their lingua franca; but they recognise the power of the English language for integration and have employed the English and the Americans to teach them the language back home in China. If you go to Beijing, Shanghai or even Gwanzo, you’ll find a lot of them speaking English.”

    On business in the village

    “As you can see business is down; unlike in those days at Awolowo Road or even when we just moved here. Things took a downward turn when the place was shut down right after the late Stella Obasanjo died. You know she officially commissioned this place and gave us a lot of support to flourish. It was re-opened about six months later, but it has never really regained that tempo.” Sam lamented.

    To buttress his point, he revealed that he ordinarily used to have in his employ an average of eight sales assistants, but now, he can only manage about four. He added that the coming of the Chinese, whether to the formal sector or the informal sector, has helped in reducing the level of unemployment in the country. “No one can deny that organisations like StarTimes, Tecno, CCECC and other Chinese trading stores have provided employment for thousands of Nigerians,” he reasoned.

    On the allegation of substandard goods/products

    He dismissed the perception that Chinese are manufacturers of fake good. “That’s not true. Goods are made to specification and people only get what they request and pay for. Even Europeans and Americans go there (to China) to place orders for different kinds of specifications and they get them because over there, labour is cheap. So it’s your money that counts.” He added that officials of the Standard Organisation of Nigeria were at the complex recently and Sam and Windy’s store was given a clean bill of health, so it’s not everybody that brings in substandard goods. Using their shop as a reference therefore, Sam insists that quality goods abound.

    Sam would also want people to view the whole issue of standard from the angle of affordability. “At least they bring in what is affordable. Some people can only afford the cheap stuffs and they only oblige them by making available what they can afford. At the same time, they make top-notch quality; and it’s your financial power and tastes that eventually determine what you go for.

  • Why I visited Obasanjo- Jonathan

    President Goodluck Jonathan has confirmed meeting with former President Olusegun Obasanjo on Saturday in his residence in Owu, Abeokuta, Ogun State.

    He told newsmen that although  he was in Abeokuta  to pay condolence visit to his  Special Adviser, Reuben Abati whose mother was buried on Friday, he could not have come to the Ogun State capital where the former president resides, and not pay him a visit.

    Coming to Abeokuta and not visiting Obasanjo, he said, would have make some people speculate that there was a problem between them.

    He said: “It is true we saw President Obasanjo in his house because we came here to Abeokuta to commiserate with Abati who buried his mother yesterday. And knowing that Abati’s house is at the backyard of Obasanjo’s house, it will not be good if we come and not visit him.”

    “Even the man himself will not be happy if we don’t visit him. I am like a son to Obasanjo,” he added.

    Dressed in a black flowing agbada and a Yoruba cap to match, President Jonathan arrived Obasanjo’s residence  around 12 noon in the company of Senator Grace Folashade Bent.

    Even as details of the closed door meeting was unknown, it is believed that the discussions centred on  2015 election, the crisis in the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), and the controversy surrounding the planned conduct of PDP’s mini National Convention.

    The Chairman of the PDP Governors’ Forum (PDPGF) and Akwa Ibom State Governor, Godswill Akpabio had been reported to have made moves to reconcile them especially to facilitate the yet to be announced second term ambition of the President.

    Speaking with newsmen at the Abati’s residence President Jonathan said that he would have attended the Abati’s Church Service after commissioning the Police housing estate on Friday but had to fly out to Togo to meet President of Côte d’Ivoire, Allasane Quattara, and his Togolese counterpart over some looming political crisis.

    Jonathan condoled the family as he noted Abati was a member of his family and advised the family to take solace in the fact that their mother lived to a ripe old age beyond the biblical three score and ten.

    Speaking during the visit, Abati said that the family was no longer expecting the President since he was represented by his Chief of Staff, Chief Mike Ogiadomhe, at the church service.

    Abati  said  he was happy with the life his mother lived as not many mothers would die and their burial attract the presence of the nation’s president.

  • 2013 Budget row:Bill scales second reading

    2013 Budget row:Bill scales second reading

    The N4.987 trillion Amendment Bill sent by President Goodluck Jonathan to the House of Representatives has scaled second reading.

    Although the bill passed without opposition on the floor yesterday, it would be subjected to scrutiny by the House Committees on Appropriation and Finance.

    The House Majority Leader, Mulikat Akande-Adeola, who presented the bill, said there was no difference in the Appropriation Act passed by the House and assented to by the President, adding that the President was only seeking to restore funds that were removed from some sectors by the House to make the budget implementable.

    In the bill, N2,418,976,391,494 is for Recurrent (non-debt) expenditure, while N1,588,578,805,197 is for contribution to development fund for Capital expenditure.

    Also, N388.063billion was proposed for Statutory transfers, while N591.764billion is for debt services.

    During the debate in which only three lawmakers contributed, suspicion was raised over the more than 400,000 barrels of crude lost daily as claimed by the Minster of Finance, Dr. Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, when she appeared before a joint Committee a few days ago.

    As a result, the Speaker Aminu Tambuwal, mandated the House Committees on Finance to investigate the revenue profile of the country and report back next Tuesday.

    Akande-Adeola said the figure in the new bill was not different from the Appropriation Act, arguing that the Executive was desirous of restoration of funds removed from some critical sectors.

    In his submission, Chairman, Committee on Appropriation, John Enoh (PDP, Cross River) said the bill should be given the chance to get to the Committee stage where all grey areas would be examined.

    He noted that without prejudice to the volumes of the Amendment Bill, the lawmakers would examine the few areas highlighted in the new bill.

    “This Amendment Bill is an aggregate expenditure of what the National Assembly passed. I will rather suggest we use the window of opportunity of this bill to find out more about the few areas of concerns that were highlighted,” he said.

  • ‘Why Nigeria is increasing investment ties with China’

    ‘Why Nigeria is increasing investment ties with China’

    President Goodluck Jonathan has said that Nigeria is currently strengthening its investment and economic ties with China because of the exponential increase in the bilateral trade volume between the two countries within the last few years.

    He also said the bond between the pair was infirmed by China’s involvement in the financing and construction of key infrastructural projects in Nigeria.

    Jonathan spoke at the closing ceremony of the Nigeria-China Business Forum, organised by the Ministry of Industry, Trade and Investment, in Beijing on Wednesday.

    The event, which had over 300 Chinese investors, culminated in the signing of no fewer than seven Memoranda of Understanding between Chinese investors, the Bauchi State Government and private investors.

    Jonathan said: “I want to specially commend the Ministry of Industry, Trade and Investment for the spectacular work done in putting together such a wonderful and world class event. I also want to thank investors for their interest in Nigeria, which is now the number one investment destination in Africa.

    “The various MoUs signed between Chinese and Nigerian companies will lead to stronger economic ties between the two countries. Nigeria and China are the two largest economies in their respective regions. Since Nigeria and China started diplomatic relations, the bilateral relations between the two countries have continued to wax stronger as the years progressed.”

    He added, “Nigeria and China have had strong economic ties in trade and investment over the past years. At present, China and Nigeria has annual bilateral trade exceeding $13billion. In 2002, the value of trade between Nigeria and China was just $2billion.

    He said the trade between Nigeria and China accounts for nearly one third of the trade between China and West Africa, and this would continue to grow bigger, indicating the importance of Nigeria to China in the regional market.

    In recognition of the strategic trade link between the two countries, the Central Bank of Nigeria recently converted some portions of Nigeria’s foreign reserve from the United States Dollars, to the Chinese Yuan. Beyond trade, China has been instrumental to supporting Nigeria with financial arrangement and investment in strategic infrastructural projects like rail, road and free trade zones, among others.”

    Jonathan stressed that the country’s current robust, stable macro-economic environment had strategically positioned it as the preferred investment destination in Africa and globally.

    He said: “Nigeria is currently the preferred destination for Chinese companies in Africa. Presently, more than 200 Chinese companies are currently operating in Nigeria and they are doing very well. Nigeria is open for business as we currently have some of the best incentives in the world for investors to take advantage of. Our tax policies are quite robust and the business environment we have in Nigeria is exceptional.”

    The Minister of Industry, Trade and Investment, Mr. Olusegun Aganga, said, “One of the major achievements of this forum is the big large commitment by Chinese investors in terms of investing in key sectors of the Nigerian economy. For example, the largest coal to power company in China is interested in coming to invest in Nigeria.

    “Also, many big companies who are into power generation and transmission have indicated their interest in investing in Nigeria. In addition to this, we have held discussions with China Development Bank in the area of Small and Medium development. In fact, the momentum is very high in terms of investors’ interest in Nigeria.”

  • Presidential anarchy

    Presidential anarchy

    Can the president of the Federal Republic levy war against a state and get away with it? From the conduct of President Goodluck Jonathan’s henchmen and women in the Rivers contrived crisis, that appears the case.

    It is nothing short of criminalising the presidency. But how much of this impunity can the civil order bear before something terrible gives?

    The especial tragedy of the Jonathan Presidency is, with reckless regularity, it repeats history as farce.

    But neither the first Nigerian president to boast a PhD, nor his hyper-educated aides, seems fazed by this roller-coaster cascade into infamy. Such is their total gobble of the sweet poison of naked power – powers they don’t even have, had they not chosen to criminalise the presidency, if they ever bothered to read between the lines of the 1999 Constitution, warts and all!

    Take the latest trigger in the contrived crisis: the Rivers House of Assembly mayhem of July 9. Now, between the Goodluck Jonathan and Rotimi Amaechi battling camps, there is enough villainy to gift a multitude, with some left-over.

    How can an immaculate, fiery and all-conquering mace-battler, with the moral ardour of some bathetic Christ clearing his father’s house of worship of a den of thieves, morph into a sanctimonious victim, nestling in a hospital bed; and peeping at millions of sympathisers, from the vantage point of the lead photo, on the front page of a national newspaper?

    But before you condemn that battler, meet his victim: an apparent constitutional criminal, one of the G-5 renegades who, backed by some subversive federal power, felt they could impeach the Rivers Assembly Speaker and, like some tragic-comic pantomime with voice-over, were already on the subversive ritual, seconding motions, suspending imaginary legislators, voting, getting “elected” and giving “acceptance speeches”!

    Must Nigerians be assaulted by such power lunacy?

    To apologists or self-proclaimed purists, who insist “constitutional criminal” is jumping the legal gun, since no one has been tried and found guilty, this riposte: if the courts had serially voided such legislative banditry in Oyo, Plateau and Anambra states, during the Obasanjo-era presidential anarchy, can it be less culpable now because Jonathan-era legislative lunatics are repeating the farce?

    And here really lies the crux: if Obasanjo could grandstand that Nuhu Ribadu was undermining the Constitution to get rid of allegedly thieving politicians, what noble cause can the current rascals attach to their own subversive activism?

    Those who nail Governor Amaechi for “invading” the Rivers legislature to clear the mess miss the point. Yes, a governor should be a gentleman. But with a president that tweaks rules for illicit gains, that could be fatal.

    If you doubt, ask Rashidi Ladoja, the bitter-sweet former governor of Oyo State. He shunned President Obasanjo’s diktat that he surrender his gubernatorial authority to Lamidi Adedibu, Obasanjo’s beloved Ibadan garrison commander, only to holler in the cold for no less than 10 months, victim of an illegal impeachment.

    To those who still want to play the ostrich, pushing “law” without factoring in the lawless temper of its operators, the odyssey of Justice Isa Ayo Salami, under this same Jonathan Presidency, is instructive. Salami did his duty by law. But to the lawless in government, that was near-capital crime, for which the no-nonsense president of the Court of Appeal is paying.

    Yes, the Judiciary saved Ladoja; and voided the allied legislative rascality in Plateau and Anambra states. But with the Salami experience, it is doubtful if that judiciary had not melted into Heraclitus’s state of flux, no thanks to a hostile Jonathan Presidency.

    Amaechi certainly was not pretty, “storming” the legislature to nip in the bud the putative coup against his office. But he did the needful to preserve his position in an emerging presidential anarchy. For all you know, if the coup against him had succeeded, he would now be shrieking, Ladoja-like, from the wilderness, while his traducers would be mouthing “due process”! No society thrives under such cynical manipulation.

    But it is instructive how this Jonathan-era rascality empties into the Obasanjo-era mother river, even if Jonathan’s bumbling, to use Malthus-speak of basic economics, is “geometrical” while Obasanjo’s “original sins” now appear “arithmetical”.

    Talking about “original sin”, the dramatis personae of the current crisis appear to have cleanly forgotten the first outrage of 10 July 2003 (the Rivers outrage followed almost 10 years after, 9 July 2013!), when some Abuja-backed criminals tried to unseat controversial Governor Chris Ngige. It was the classic malevolent godfather’s challenge, before the plague of illicit impeachments based on “simple minorities”, which the latest Rivers jokers essayed with devastating consequences.

    What happened to the ring leaders back then: AIG Raphael Ige, the apparent Abuja viceroy in the crime, Tafa Balogun, then sitting IG, and even Obasanjo himself, the sitting president who, throughout the crisis, pushed the theory of plausible deniability?

    AIG Ige, the apparent fall guy, suffered abrupt retirement (even if his retirement time was close) and later, sudden death. Mr. Balogun suffered eventual humiliation, though his role, beyond being the Police IG was unclear; and his comeuppance was not directly linked to the Ngige saga. Even Obasanjo has continued to suffer progressive devaluation, to the point of irrelevance, since his presidential glory days.

    Do all these speak to Mbu Joseph Mbu, the commissioner of Police deep in the Rivers crisis, given his inappropriate conduct and reckless utterances? There are always spiritual consequences for political rascality that hurt the silent and innocent majority.

    Festus Eriye, editor of The Nation on Sunday, in his penetrating piece of July 14, described President Jonathan as Pontius Pilate, in a piece he headlined “Pontius Pilate strikes again”. That was a brilliant metaphor because before Jonathan, there was Sir Abubakar Tafawa Balewa, Nigeria’s first and only Prime Minister, and Pontius Pilate I of Nigeria’s troubled political horizon.

    Sir Abubakar launched political insurrection at the Western Region, with his suspect proclamation of state of emergency, after a contrived crisis in the Western House of Assembly, just to cripple Obafemi Awolowo.

    Jonathan, Pontius Pilate II, is doing the same, in what would have been the old Eastern Region, although this time, against a party mate; but with no less partisan bile, despite his aides’ comical denial. Jonathan court historians should check their history books and tell their principal how the Balewa gambit ended.

    Which brings us to the Jonathan denial ensemble: two “doctors”, Reuben Abati, Doyin Okupe and a Gulak, who obviously thinks everybody’s thinking faculty is, as his own, locked in Jonathan’s gulag!

    Ahmed Gulak, sounding every inch a power brat, told Prof. Wole Soyinka to be “responsible” (a counsel his principal ironically needs more than anyone!), because of Soyinka’s stance on the contrived Rivers crisis.

    Well, Gulak should check his history books. When Balewa was being led astray or even Obasanjo, Jonathan’s political creator, was leading himself astray, Soyinka was there, an ever consistent voice of reason, which nevertheless is the proverbial harsh hunter’s whistle, to the hearing of a doomed dog.

    Those who engage in double-speak, let them. But true friends of Goodluck Jonathan must tell him to withdraw from his Rivers misadventure.

    It is a wide and merry way that leads to infamy.

     

  • Pontius Pilate strikes again

    Pontius Pilate strikes again

    I read an online reaction to a story on the political crisis in Rivers State that went something like this: ‘If you have a quarrel with your wife, blame Jonathan; if your dog falls sick, blame Jonathan.’ The implication is that President Goodluck Jonathan is being unfairly criticised for his perceived role in fanning fires threatening to consume the state.

    Picking up on this, the Presidency issued two statements distancing it from the storm. One by Jonathan’s spokesman, Reuben Abati, said in part: “There is absolutely no factual basis for suggestions that some of the politicians involved in the current dispute are acting at the behest of the President.

    “President Jonathan certainly did not instigate the crisis in the Rivers State House of Assembly and as President of the nation he will never support any actions that negate his avowed commitment to the rule of law.”

    Is the president taking undeserved flak for the show of shame in Rivers? I don’t think so. I will add that anyone expecting a video showing Jonathan at the head of a mob descending on the assembly, or hoping to hear some tape recording of the commander-in-chief giving marching orders to Joseph Mbu’s men, will wait in vain.

    But this is politics and the president’s acts of omission and commission, his wife’s ungainly stamping on the Rivers political terrain, have left indelible fingerprints of the presidency all over the crime scene. Supporters know better than to expect a written script. They simply decode their leader’s body language and utterances to decipher where he’s headed.

    That is the reason why till today former President Olusegun Obasanjo swears he never ordered anyone to prosecute a Third Term Agenda on his behalf.

    But millions were squandered in pursuit of the goal; his henchmen in the National Assembly actively pushed the idea, and never once did he denounce the project with the vehemence that would have stopped the jobbers. Is it any surprise that Obasanjo’s disavowal of the plot continue to ring hollow?

    Let’s examine Jonathan’s denials in the light of what we know. Months before the May election that re-elected Rotimi Amaechi as chairman of the Nigeria Governors’ Forum (NGF), the president let it be known he wanted the incumbent out. He called governors individually and made his pitch. That was how signatures on that piece of paper endorsing the president’s choice were collected.

    After the spectacular failure of presidential might to deliver, Jonathan quickly issued another statement distancing himself from NGF intrigues.

    His denial could have amounted to something if he hadn’t revealed his partisan interest in the matter thereafter by recognising the losing candidate, Plateau State Governor Jonah Jang, as NGF chairman at an Aso Villa event!

    The man received only 16 votes out of 35! Aside from further entrenching the diabolical Nigerian trait of never accepting unpalatable electoral outcomes, his endorsement of Jang only got him mired deeper in the quicksand of NGF politics.

    From the moment Amaechi decided – against Jonathan’s wish – to run, hitherto cold relations became glacial. When the courts sacked the state Peoples’ Democratic Party (PDP) executive friendly to him, the new gang loyal to Abuja made it clear they were out to execute a hostile agenda.

    Things that have unfolded in recent days have been the object of speculation in newspapers. Shockingly, both the outlandish and the illegal have played out as projected. Despite an overwhelming numerical disadvantage, the Evans Bipi-led Gang of Five pressed ahead with their power grab in an assembly that sits 32. What could have given them such courage than comfort in powers greater than a governor’s? Check the chain of events in the preceding weeks.

    State Commissioner of Police, Joseph Mbu, who reports to the president’s appointee, Inspector-General of Police, Mohammed Abubakar, had just been engaged in a public slanging match with Amaechi. Among other things he called the governor a ‘despot.’

    Did this civil servant get even a slap on the wrist for his outrageous conduct? No way! How else will anyone interpret that episode than to conclude that the police chief had the backing of higher powers to go toe-to-toe with the ‘heady’ governor?

    While Ameachi was still digesting that helping of humiliation, Her Excellency the First Lady of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, Dame Patience Jonathan, swept into town. Interestingly, she had come to play the role of ‘Mother of the Day’ at the wedding of Mr. Bipi – leader of the Gang of Five.

    In the course of those celebrations, the Right Honourable First Lady fired off a couple of political missiles in the direction of Amaechi. Among other things she said Port Harcourt which used to be a pleasant place to visit under former governors had degenerated under the incumbent. She them went on to heap praise on Amaechi’s nemesis, Minister of State for Education, Nyesom Wike.

    Later that day, she met with the ‘Gang of Five’. The following morning virtually all newspapers were agog with reports that madam had come to tidy up the impeachment of Amaechi.

    Although, her spokesperson denied that her visit to Port Harcourt had anything to do with piling more woes on the governor, anyone who knows the formidable dame would have taken the explanation with a generous helping of salt.

    Mrs. Jonathan has redefined the role of president’s spouse. She was never going to be a glamour puss – content with parading in pretty clothes, doing good works. She has taken things to another level: now we have a First Lady who is both political partisan and enforcer.

    The dame has been credited as one of the major pillars behind the president’s rise. She has not allowed a little thing like the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) clearance stop her from flagging off her husband’s 2015 campaign. Whatever she was doing in Port Harcourt was certainly advancing those interests. And someone will say the president’s not involved.

    I have watched the horror video of last Tuesday’s events at the Rivers State House of Assembly. At some point, Bipi is enveloped in a friendly embrace with some unidentified individual who appeared to be trying to calm him. After hearing out the peacemaker, the warrior-lawmaker could be heard muttering: “But why must governor came (sic) here to supervise beating up of my colleagues; why must he insult the president; why did he insult my ‘mother’…”

    Is the president involved? In Bipi’s words you have your answer. Jonathan may not have been physically present but what is going on is all about his personality and political clashes with the governor.

    Back in 2011, in a moment of exasperation with his critics deriding his laidback style, the president declared he was neither Pharoah, nor a lion or general. I agree that given the package we were sold in that election year, the man Nigerians voted back then would not fit those descriptions.

    However, in the light of what has happened over the last few months, and the constant of denials of the obvious, I think a more appropriate comparison would be Pontius Pilate. He released Jesus Christ to a baying mob and thought that by washing his hands with water he could free himself from blood guilt. How wrong he was. Jonathan’s name keeps ringing in this Rivers matter because he’s involved.

    He can show that his hands are clean by doing what Obasanjo failed to do in the face on the Third Term accusations: denounce in clear, unambiguous terms every unconstitutional attempt to unsettle Rivers State.

    A few days ago the Federal Government denounced the street-instigated military coup in Egypt. To keep silent in face of similar underhand tactics in the president’s backyard would be height of hypocrisy.

  • To China with waste

    To China with waste

    President Jonathan’s 13-minister, four-governor delegation to China perhaps hallmarks an idle country cavalier in its idleness

    Even for a reported finalisation of a US $1.1 billion loan, President Goodluck Jonathan’s five-day visit to China, boasting 13 ministers, four governors, a platoon of aides and a battery of media personnel, paints a picture of a country tragically without focus. Which other country would so merrily trot out virtually its whole establishment because it is finalising a loan deal?

    On the trip and its humongous delegation, Reuben Abati, presidential spokesperson, had made a spirited defence. Of course, there is something asinine in the claim that President Jonathan took off to China just to spite US President Barack Obama, for again snubbing Nigeria on his second visit to Africa, during which he visited Senegal, South Africa and Tanzania. That sounds evidently stupid and Dr. Abati did well to dismiss it with the contempt it deserved.

    But not so the humongous presidential delegation. It is true the US $1.1 billion finalised during the trip is part of a US $3 billion loan package, at interest rates of below three per cent that China is extending to Nigeria. The package is meant to fund infrastructure: airport terminals in four cities, roads, a light-rail line in Abuja, the federal capital; a hydropower plant and other projects in oil and gas.

    But trucking 13 ministers, four governors and a rash of aides – does that not reflect the manifest waste that has condemned Nigeria to seeking the China loan when it could, if it husbanded its resources well, have financed a good percentage of these projects from its own pocket? Indeed, the picture of this fair weather delegation is the grim irony of a poor country happily show-casing a rich, over-pampered and wasteful bureaucracy.

    The Presidency could well argue that since the loan was multi-sectoral, the various ministries involved had to be represented on the China trip. But13 ministers? And there is a coordinating minister of the economy? And also a Minister of National Planning?

    That everyone thrust himself or herself forward to be part of the gravy is indicative of a presidency bereft of planning; and almost incapable of fully grasping its needs; and putting to work a lean staff, to get the most effective results, with eyes focused on cost cutting.

    Indeed, it would appear that despite signs emerging that the government could be running broke – or what other reasons could be there for proposing to shrink the 2013 federal budget? – the Jonathan Presidency appears incapable of avoiding a bloated bureaucracy. That is the picture the China junketing paints.

    Dr. Abati could push the official line that everyone on Jonathan’s delegation was well accounted for, had a specific function and would return value for money. He is entitled to his official-speak. But the presidential spokesman should grant Nigerians some measure of intelligence; and accord them some mastery of the negative sociology that drives governance on these shores; which Nigerians have come to know over the years.

    True, a good number of the delegates would be fully engaged, particularly the sub-heads of delegations. The ministers should be well engaged, even if the sheer number of their tribe present – 13 – still rankles. So, would be their immediate lieutenants. But the farther down the line, the more lax they become and the more unjustifiable the inclusion in the team.

    Indeed, many a delegate would be on the trip simply because some high official felt obliged to compensate the lower official with government estacode – the government travel allowance. Such is the abiding racketeering on public funds.

    If you factor in probable corruption, which could entail the benefactor having a cut from the beneficiary’s largesse; and even the whole delegation, being China Government guests, drawing the full estacode instead of a third as dictated by Civil Service Regulations, then you can understand why Jonathan’s delegation is so big, happy and merry! These are the probable systemic wastes that have rendered the country prostrate, when it should be out there competing with the rest of the world.

    Despite the junketing (which runs counter to the spirit of going a-borrowing) however, the China trip is not altogether unnecessary. Decayed infrastructure is the bane of this economy. A policy of sustained investment on infrastructure cannot go wrong, other things being equal. A promise of four glittering and new airports, light rail for Abuja to improve intra-city commuting, a hydropower plant to solve the abiding electricity problems and new projects in oil and gas is exciting; and good for the economy.

    What is not so good is the record of tardy implementation (or even total abandonment), even after a deal has been struck; and of course, the baffling change in public policy, simply because a new set of faces has taken over government.

    On October 30, 2006, for instance, the Olusegun Obasanjo Presidency signed a US $8 billion contract with the China Civil Engineering Construction Corporation (CECCC) to modernise the Lagos-Kano railway line, replacing the present obsolete narrow gauge with a medium-gauge track. But for some reasons, the succeeding Umaru Musa Yar’ Adua Presidency cancelled the contract and opted to renovate the present obsolete tracks. Earlier, Obasanjo himself, exhibiting anti-Sani Abacha sentiments, had cancelled a US $3 billion contract with China to modernise Nigerian rail, citing alleged corruption. Will the sad history continue with this latest economic tryst with China?

    Despite the bloated delegation to sign this latest infrastructure deal, therefore, even all the wastes would matter little if the government delivers on the project to gift the economy a kiss of life.

    But will it? We insist it must.

  • Fed Govt gets N80b investment in agric, says Jonathan

    Fed Govt gets N80b investment in agric, says Jonathan

    More than N80 billion investment has been attracted to the agricultural sector from the private sector, President Goodluck Jonathan said yesterday.

    He made this remark in Abuja while speaking at a two-day summit by the Rockefeller Foundation.

    The summit, titled: ‘Realising the Potential of African Agriculture,’ is part of the drawn-up programmes for the centennial (100 years) celebration of the foundation.

    Jonathan stressed that the transformation of agriculture in Nigeria is a centerpiece of the entire transformation agenda of his administration, adding that his programmes are tailored toward making agriculture attractive to the private sector as a viable business.

    He said: “To drive our agriculture, we have ended the approach of agriculture as a development programme, we now take agriculture as a business. Private sector investments are expanding rapidly from sales by fertilizer companies, agriculture processors.”

    “In the last one year alone over N80 billion of private sector commitments have been made to the agricultural sector. We developed staple crops processing zones to attract the private sector to invest in rural areas to process and add value to all of our crops.”

    “This will reduce post-harvest losses and create jobs for our people.” He noted

    According to him, over 1.5 million farmers have benefited from the Electronic-Wallet System developed by the administration.

    The e-wallet system allows farmers to receive electronic voucher to redeem subsidized fertilizers, improved seeds and other farm inputs directly from private sector seeds and fertilizer companies.

    Jonathan said: “I am pleased to note that Nigeria is the first country to develop such scheme in Africa. Farmers now receive their seeds and fertilizer via mobile phones in the first one year of this experiment and we ended four decades of corruption in our fertilizer sector.”

    As the world largest producer of cassava, he said that the desire of his government is to make Nigeria the world largest processor of cassava.

    Towards cutting down import of wheat, he said that the administration embarked on a major innovation to use high quality cassava flour to replace some of the imported wheat flour.

    “Today, cassava bread made out of composite flower from 20 per cent cassava and wheat flour have hit our markets. This alone has saved Nigeria, N254 billion (about 1.5 billion dollars) in import bills on wheat.” he stated

    On the need for the country to move away from the monolithic oil economy, he said: “Nigeria is known for oil, but today, many countries around the world have found oil.”

    “The recent discovery of crude oil and gas in the US and other parts of the world means that we must look elsewhere if we must continue to feed our people.”

    “With abundant land and water resources and abundant labour force, Nigeria has all it takes to use agriculture as its new frontier for growth. There is no reason why Nigeria should be a net food importing country. It should be a net food exporting country.”

  • Jonathan advises youths on tolerance

    Jonathan advises youths on tolerance

    President Goodluck Jonathan has advised Nigerian youths to use religion to foster peace and unity in the country, even as religious youth leaders blamed the spate of societal decadence, especially violence, on the failure of religious leaders to impact teachings geared towards tolerance, peace and national unity in their followers.

    Speaking in Abuja at the first Nigerian Inter-religious Youth Summit, President Jonathan, who noted that the summit could not have come at a better time than now, said religion should be more than going to churches or mosques every day.

    Jonathan, who was represented by his Senior Special Assistant on Youth and Student Affairs, Jude Imagwe said:  “We have to be tolerant of others if we must move our society forward. When went wrong? There was a time in this country when we used to wait eagerly for exchange of gifts from our neighbours, Muslims and Christians during Sallah and Christmas. We have to start preaching peace, but to achieve peace, we must work for peace.”

    The convener of the summit, Timothy Ademola said the blame of the present rot should be directed at religious leaders, saying: “It has been argued that if religious teachers and scholars can come up with sacred identity constructs that outline more peaceful world views, the world will, to a large extent, be made much better.

    “Given the fact that youths constitute the most active segment of any religion when it comes to the implementation of its sacred identity constructs, it goes without saying that such constructs become more socially-accommodating and productive.

    “The youth that adopt the will become more socially accommodating and productive. At this level, religion actively becomes an instrument for youth empowerment and constructive change.”

    The President of Youth Wing of Christian Association of Nigeria (YOWICAN), Simon Dolly urged understanding between religious faiths.

    He said: “We need to understand each other, work together and build bridges. We should build on our strength rather than look at our weaknesses.”

    In his presentation, the National President of National Council of Muslim Youth Organisation (MACOMYO), Kamaldeen Akintunde regretted that hypocrisy on the part of religious leaders has contributed, in no small measures, to the spate of violence in the country.

    “Since religion, as a concept, means different things to different people, we should then strive to make it an agent of stability. This is more so because religious intolerance has cost the country so much in our socio-political and economic development.

    While he canvassed for constitutional regulation of religious activities, the youth leader urged political, religious and community leaders to be cautious when making comments on religious issues.

    The representative of Eckankar said the solution to violence in the country is peace.

  • A sector in search of redemption

    A sector in search of redemption

     Poor policy execution, inconsistency and lack of skilled manpower, among others, combined to hinder the actualisation of the maritime sector’s potentials in the first half of the year, writes Oluwakemi Dauda

     

    The Federal Government extended for the second time this year, the Destination Inspection contract with the service providers following the Customs’ inability to train its officers to take over the N257 billion scheme.

    The seven-year contract, which was to expire on December 31, last year, was first extended on January 1, this year by President Goodluck Jonathan.

    The new six months extension was granted last month, by the Federal Government through the Ministry of Finance.

    The seven-year Build, Own, Operate and Transfer DI contract entered in January 2006 with Cotecna Destination Inspection Nigeria Limited, Globalscan Systems Limited, SGS and Webb Fontaine; ought to have expired last Sunday.

    Stakeholders said Customs’ supervising ministry also did not see the preparedness of Customs officials to take over the job from the service providers and that the Federal Government was worried because it was afraid of creating crisis at the ports and the border stations.

    Sources, however, said the Federal Government expects Customs to build adequate capacity to ensure smooth takeover of the scheme before the end of the year.

     

    US sanctions/ ISP code

    A 90-day ultimatum was issued to Nigeria by the United States government to improve on security at ports and waterways or face a ban on ships from entering the country.

    The US threatened to stop shipping services to Nigeria and to also mobilise its allied countries to do the same if the port security situation was not improved upon.

    The 90-day ultimatum started in May and will expire at the end of August.

    Following the threat by the US  to stop shipping services to Nigeria and to also mobilise its allied countries to do the same if the port security situation was not improved upon. Consequently, the Nigeria Maritime Administration and Safety Agency (NIMASA) and other maritime stakeholders called for the implementation of International Ships and Port Facility Security (ISPS) code.

    ISPS code is the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) convention to secure and safeguard ships and port facilities around the world following the renewed global terrorism.

    Speaking at the opening of a two day General Stakeholders Conference on “Reviving ISPS Code Implementation in Nigeria” held in Lagos last month, NIMASA’s Director General, Mr Ziakede Akpobolokemi, said what concerns the country is the protocol put in place by the International Maritime Organisation (IMO), in the form of the ISPS Code, to ensure that the global maritime arena is free from the threat of terrorism and other.

    He said, the gains of compliance with the ISPS Code are immense and serve as an  aesthetic for any short-term discomfort which the implementation agenda might cause in the interim.

    On the flip side, he said, the risks of non-compliance with the ISPS Code are frightening and given the threats the country faces from the growing menace of global terrorism and other maritime crimes, non-compliance, he said, would prove disastrous.

     

    Commercial regulators

    The plan by the Nigerian Ports Authority (NPA) and the Nigerian Shippers’ Council (NSC) to become the commercial regulators at the ports was dashed by the Senate Committee on Marine Transport. The bill for the creation of a Technical Regulator is before the National Assembly.

    In their efforts to facilitate trade and stop arbitrary charges by terminal operators, both the NPA and the Shippers’ Council have been jostling for the position of technical regulator at ports .The legislative body is trying to create a technical regulator that will promote the interest of importers and other port users.

    But the two agencies are yet to get the nod of the Senate to take the position.

    Speaking in Houston Texas, United States, the Chairman, Senate Committee on Marine Transport, Senator Zainab Kure, said the senate would not consider the two agencies in their legislative efforts to create a technical regulator for port operations in the country.

    She said the Senate was not in support of any of the two agencies to regulate the industry.

    But stakeholders said the failure of the government to appoint commercial regulator for the ports are part of the reason why the cost of doing business is high and urged the government to address the issue before the year runs out.

     

    NIMASA and CVFF

    Operators say NIMASA performed well during the period under review as the agency is showing the ability to carry out its core responsibilities of assisting indigenous ship owners through the disbursement of the Cabotage fund to six applicants. The agency also uncovered about 1,200 fake certificates for vessels operating on Nigerian waters.

    Also, indigenous participation in the shipping sector, which is the core responsibility of the agency was at its lowest ebb during the period because of lack of fund from the government and the current war between it and NLNG. Operators urged President Jonathan to prevail on NIMASA and NNPC/NLNG to end the crisis as they see it as an embarrassment to the nation.

     

    NPA row and port facilities

    The award of the contract for the dredging of the Calabar port to Niger Global Engineering and Technical Company Limited, by the Managing Director, Nigerian Ports Authority (NPA), Mallam Habib Abdullahi, became a serious issue  between him and the Chairman, Chief Tony Anenih during the period under review.

    In a five-page letter titled: Appointment of Calabar Channel Management Company Limited to Manage the Calabar Channel Under a Public Private Partnership (PPP) Agreement with the Nigerian Ports Authority (NPA) sent to the Minister of Transport, Senator Idris Umar raised questions about the award of the contract. He said it did not follow due process.

    The Joint Venture Agreement (JVA) for the contract was said to have been signed by NPA and the company on January 25, this year. Unless some issues, including the Nigerian Ports Authority’s (NPA’s) allegedly owing their members 11 months unpaid salaries, are promptly resolved, there would be crisis.

    The Maritime Workers’ Union of Nigeria (MWUN) in a petition dated June 12, 2013, and addressed to President Jonathan, alleged that NPA had for the past 11 months not paid tally clerks, on-board security men and others.

    They threatened last week, to shut the ports this week if the 11 months unpaid salaries of its members are not paid by NPA.

     

    Foreign ship owners

    Foreign ships owners still dominated the nation’s waters – a development, which indigenous ship owners have persistently criticized.

    Other stakeholders said the foreign dominance costs Nigeria huge revenue losses yearly.

     

    Shippers’ Council/ NIWA

    The appointment of Mr Hassan Bello as the Executive Secretary/Chief Executive Officer of the Nigerian Shippers’ Council (NSC) was confirmed by the government. He was the first person to be appointed internally to hold the position in almost 20 years of the agency.

    The Nigerian Inland Waterways Authority (NIWA) got the first female Managing Director,  Hajiya Inna Maryam Ciroma.