Tag: President Trump

  • President Trump at UN General Assembly plenary

    Antonio Guterres, the Secretary-General of the United Nations in his annual report before the plenary session of the General Assembly on September 25, painted a sombre and dangerous picture of the world in which unilateralism is being preferred over the post-Second World War multilateral diplomacy and multinational institutions which have secured the world after a bitterly fought world war and an unstable post war peace. The Secretary General said the idea of each country building a fortress around itself was what led to the Second World War. He identified climate change and the danger of wrong application of robotics and artificial intelligence as posing challenge to mankind’s survival. The melting of arctic ice in places like Greenland and other areas, in the polar regions of the world, if evidence are still needed, is a clear indication of the challenge of a deluge to the world apart from the unseasonable heavy rains and high temperatures.

    On the technology front, he felt the use of machines to wage war and to kill people may get out of hands where machines take independent and automatic actions in killing human beings. He called on all humanity to come together and save the world from destruction.  He emphasized that security cannot be secured individually but by the collective effort of the world. He may have had an advance copy of President Donald Trump’s speech and felt he needed to respond to it in advance.

    President Trump’s speech called on individual states to embrace “patriotism, pride and prosperity”  over globalism which before the First World War was in consonant with traditional American isolationism rooted in the Monroe Doctrine which the president made an allusion to. He began by saying no administration in the history of the United States has achieved as much as his administration. This attracted the laughter of the assembled delegates from all over the world which felt the American president mistook the audience for an American campaign rally. The president was visibly shaken but he brushed off the embarrassment by jokingly saying he was surprised by the reaction of the audience.

    Then he continued by saying all the “wonderful” things he had achieved since he last spoke at the United Nations. He said he has built an American economy in which unemployment has virtually disappeared. He emphasized the fact that millions of African-Americans, Asian-Americans and Latinos have never had it so good in terms of employment. He mentioned how America was economically strong and had gotten a budget over $700 billion for its military in 2017 and a further increase on this budget for the current year. He then called on every member state of the United Nations to be prepared to defend itself and clearly said any country that wants America to defend it must be prepared to bear the cost.

    He also mentioned how last year, he had been preoccupied with the danger posed to the USA and the world by nuclear weapons-armed North Korea but which through his effort following meeting with Kim Jon Un its leader, he has gotten a commitment towards denuclearization.  This time, the “little rocket man “has become his dear friend chairman Kim Jon Un. The president said his Secretary of State was following up efforts at further talks with the authorities in North Korea to ensure meeting the target of complete denuclearization. He said he had just signed a bilateral trade agreement in a win-win relation with South Korea. He said he had also done the same with Mexico but was quiet about Canada its northern neighbour which forms the third leg of the triangular trade relations called NAFTA (North American Free Trade Area). Surprisingly he went after China whose leader Xi Jinping he describes as his friend. He claimed that over the years China had ripped off the United States up to trillions of dollars in unfair trade and intellectual property theft. He said he was determined to reverse the situation and had imposed series of tariffs on Chinese exports to the United States and would continue until there was equilibrium in China- American trade relations.

    He singled out some countries for praise and approbation. He then mentioned a country like Saudi Arabia which was witnessing an era of reforms under its young crown prince Mohammed Bin Salman Al Saud .He also singled out Poland as a country determined to consolidate not only its political but more importantly its economic freedom by building a gas pipeline from the Baltic Sea apparently bye-passing previous Russian gas supply. He used the opportunity to lambast Germany, which these days has become his whipping boy, for its total dependence on Russia for energy supply. He praised India for seeing millions of people out of the poverty trap. He said nothing negative about Russia not even when he was talking about Syria except indirectly when he said America would not stand idly by if Syria uses chemical weapons in its civil war which had led to displacement of millions of Syrians and the death of more than half a million Syrians.

    President Trump had the harshest and undiplomatic words for Iran whose leader, Hassan Rouhani, described him as suffering from intellectual deficit. Trump said the Iranian regime was robbing its own people and that all the billions of dollars that it had earned under the 2015 nuclear agreement it signed with the P5+1 i.e. the USA, Great Britain, France, Russia and China (five permanent members of the UN Security Council) and. Germany had either been embezzled or wasted on destabilizing its neighbours and sponsoring terrorism. He said America was determined to stop Iran from harming American allies in the region. He said he was a realist and to this end he has moved American embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem in the interest of peace. He said he was elected to defend American interest and was not ashamed to do this and he called on other nations to defend their own interest. He did not say or perhaps does not care about what may happen when there is a clash of interest. He carried on with his jingoism and attacked President Maduro of Venezuela for economically destroying his country and said those who are still deluded about the efficacy of socialism should see what it had done to one of the richest countries in the world which has now been reduced to absolute poverty.

    He said nothing about climate change rather boasted about how the USA is now the largest producer of energy including “clean coal” which it was ready to export to willing buyers. On the whole, this was a rather distressing speech which brought bad taste to the mouths of all who believe in the United Nations which Trump had dismissed during his campaign for the presidency as a useless and hostile body working against American interest. He said the USA will reduce to 25% its contribution to UN peace keeping operations and that this will be on voluntary basis and not as an assessed contribution. He said America had withdrawn from UN human rights commission, UNESCO and had no good words for the WTO and that America will not participate in UN sponsored international conference on migration saying control of any country’s borders is not the business of the UN. He made it clear America will determine who comes to the country and would not welcome large numbers of refugees as it used to do and that everyone was on its own .It will not surprise any one if next year, America withdraws from the UN especially after the delegates had laughed at Trump who does not take personal attack lying down.

    Needless to say virtually every head of state or leader of a country’s delegation including President Muhammadu Buhari spoke diametrically against Trump’s position.

     

  • “Send special envoy to Nigeria”, groups appeal to Trump, US Congress

    US-based organizations, Dream Project for Africa (DPA) and International Community on Nigeria, ICON together with individual American and Nigerian-Americanstakeholders have issued a call toPresident Trump and the United States Congress to send a special envoy to Nigeria in a bid find solutions to end the killings of civilians in Northern Nigeria.

    The call came at a meeting held in Allen, Texas on Saturday, June 23, 2018.

    ThePresident of ICON, Mr. Stephen Enada appealed to those in attendance at the meeting to sign a petition intended to put pressure on Congress to speed up the legislation. “The only avenue left now is for the United States Congress and US Government to send a Special Envoy to Nigeria like it did send an envoy to Sudan in Person of Ex-Senator John Danforth. Nigeria needs help and Nigerians in North America can mobilize support for their people at home”, Stephen appealed.

    ICON Director, Mr. Kyle Abts rallied stakeholders to   sign the petition in large numbers. “We need Nigerian Americans to sign the petition, in order to convince the US politicians that we are serious! Our goal is to reach 1,000 signatures and we need more support”, Kyle stated in an email.

    Mr. Bukola Michael Nelson, the founder of Dream Project for Africa also called on the government to reconcile agitated groups and put into consideration the forced mesh of different nation-groups into the Nigerian entity. “We need to address the volatile incongruence among the nation-groups in Nigeria. Orders to stop fighting is not enough, strategies for peaceful cohabitation must be factored into a solution expected to produce sustainable impacts”, Michael explained.

    Meeting convener and social entrepreneur, Dr. SayoAjiboye noted that it was imperative for world peace that the United States and the Federal Republic of Nigeria partner, improve relations and promote peace and democracy among Nigerians and Americans both in America and in Nigeria. Dr. Sayo, emphasized that the killings  affects Muslims and Christians alike.“The killings are unnecessary, wasteful and must be immediately stopped”, Dr. Sayo remarked.

     

     

     

  • Open letter to President Trump

    Dear President Trump, we send you greeting from the Creeks, Swamps, Mangroves and Rivers of the Niger Delta Region, on the platform of the Niger Delta Self- Determination Movement. (NDSDM).

    The first time we wrote an open letter to you was after you won the elections in 2016. We wrote to congratulate you  and  the Republican Party for winning the election of 2016.

    We took that opportunity to bring to your attention the plight of the Niger Delta people, and the concerns, in-fact fears that we had at the emergence of  our  president, a retired General of the Nigerian Army.

    Between your inauguration in 2017 and  today, a lot of undemocratic events have occurred in Nigeria.

    We will try not to take you through historical education of Nigeria as you no doubt have all you need to know about Nigeria a 104years old country created by Lord Luggard  (22 January 1858  – 11 April 1945) who amalgamated the Northern and Southern Protectorates that had nothing in common  by way of culture, religion or language.

    Please allow us to mention a few anti human rights and undemocratic acts, and crimes against humanity that has taken place in Nigeria, particularly in the Middle Belt states which are majorly Christian states, and known as the food basket of Nigeria.

    Thousands of Christians, men, women, youths, children and old people, are victims of the Fulani herdsmen, that President Buhari, the Federal Government, the Military have unbelievably identified as non-Nigeria Fulani herdsmen who they claim were trained and armed by the late and former President of Libya, Gaddafi.

    The worst of the pogrom and genocide has taken place in Taraba, Benue, Adamawa, Kaduna and Plateau States. The victims of the slaughter are 95 percent Christians.

    Christians of the South of Nigeria and specifically of the oil and gas rich Niger Delta region that is undeveloped, neglected and oppressed we are very concerned for our survival today and the future of our children tomorrow.

    In 2017 on the day of your inauguration,  youths of IPOB, a nonviolent organization of the people of Igbo nation also referred to as Ndigbo and of the South East political zone of Nigeria were invaded by the military. Its leader,  Mazi Nnamdi Kanu  has not been seen or heard from since then. His parents have also not been  seen.

    This group went on a celebration and a congratulatory procession on the day of your inauguration, they were not armed yet a number of them were shot and killed in broad daylight and cold blood and a lot more arrested and still being held.

    The Nigeria army occupied the South Eastern states, the states of the Igbo nationality. During the occupation of the South Eastern states in an operation the military called ‘Operations Python Dance’ the military have been accused of torture and extra judicial killings.

    The Fulani herdsmen who are of the same Ethnic group and religion as the President get away with indiscriminate attacks and horrific killings against Christians.

    In this year 2018 from the first of January to 30th April 2018 over 2000 Christians across the Middle Belt particularly in Benue and Taraba States have been killed.

    Mr. President Nigeria is a secular state, Nigeria is not an Islamic nation, if a credible census is undertaken in Nigeria it is more likely than not that Christians are more than Muslims yet at no time in the history of Nigeria’s 104 years have Christians persecuted Muslims like the extreme movement of Muslims/Islam have persecuted Christians.

    If Christians will not be left to live at peace to practice our faith freely in our country Nigeria then we desire a referendum to be conducted amongst the ethnic nationalities across Nigeria especially in the Christian South and Middle Belt to determine if we want to stay in Nigeria that persecutes us for our religion and faith or separate from Nigeria.

    In the past four  weeks Christians in the majorly Christian states of the North East are leaving their communities abandoning their ancestral homeland in droves, Christians are daily becoming refugees in their own God given land.

    Dozens  of Churches have been burnt and destroyed in the past three years. Pastors and Priests male and female are killed routinely.

    There is a lot bitterness and discontent from the Middle Belt to the South of Nigeria, there is a great sense of disappointment and lack of confidence in the Federal Government as led by President Muhammadu Buhari.

    In the Niger Delta the region that owns the oil and gas resources exploited by the International Oil Companies and  the Federal Government, the Ethnic Nationalities of the Niger Delta region are occupied by the military and the special force set up especially for the Niger Delta region because of our oil and gas resources.

    Despite the United Nations Report on the devastating and unacceptable levels of poisonous pollution in our drinking water, air, fish and farm our people especially our youths are oppressed, occupied by the Military and kept for years in jails without trial.

    A few weeks ago, Gen. T Y Danjuma a former Army Chief of  Staff and Defense Minister a respected military insider, a Christian of Taraba State of the North East accused the Nigeria military of turning the other way (purposely turning a blind eye) while the killings of Christians by the fourth deadliest terror organization in the world according to Global Terrorism Index kill, and terrorize the people who are mainly Christians.

    These accusations against the Nigeria Government and the Nigeria Military should be investigated by the neutral UN as what is going on in Nigeria is genocide, pogrom, ethnic and religious cleansing.

    Nigeria between 1967 and 1970 have fought a civil war that claimed more than  two million lives of mainly the people of the Igbo Ethnic Nationality, including other Ethnic Nationalities of the them Eastern Region of Nigeria.

    The massacre of Christians in Nigeria is spreading and we are worried that they aim to attack the three regions of Southern Nigeria (17 states).

    This ongoing threat against Christians especially in the oil and gas rich Niger Delta region has the potential of breaking into a full scale war.

    This will be horrendous and uncontrollable not only for Nigeria but for West Africa, the Gulf of Guinea, and the entire African continent affecting the economy and all other security interests the world especially the USA and Europe has in Africa.

    This will be the biggest disaster after the 2nd World War.

    Nigeria is a complex country and the complexity is very volatile.

    The threat to democracy and the suspicion we have in the Oil and Gas producing region is that the 2019 elections will not be free and fair.

    This is another major area of concern as the people of the Niger Delta of Nigeria will not accept results of any elections that disregards the democratic will of the people by imposing a governor or other politically elected officials such as the Senators, National Assembly and House of Representatives Members of the choice by what we in Nigeria refer to as the Political Mafia or Political Cabal.

    We are aware, sir, that in the past few days leading up to this meeting you initiated that Nigerians and friends of Nigeria all over the world and from Nigeria have called into a special telephone line of the White House to express our concerns, fears, hopes, and expectations to you.

    We hope that as a world leader and believer you will sieve through the messages and act on them as Mr President our very lives, existence and future depends on what you do or don’t do.

    We are most encouraged by what God has used you to achieve in the situation of North and South Korea, by God’s grace and wisdom you will be able to keep Nigeria from imploding and affecting not only Africa disastrously but indeed the world at large.

    This impending disaster will affect Europe and the United States of America and the world at large.

    Niger Delta Self Determination Movement (NDSDM) is a non-violent organization of the numerous Ethnic Nationalities of the Oil and Gas Region of Niger Delta.

    We desire nothing less than Peace, Liberty, Equity and Justice.

    We are available anytime, anywhere to truthfully and fearlessly present out case.

    Sincerely

     

    • Annkio Briggs

    Convener of the NDSDM

     

  • Waiting for President Trump

    Waiting for President Trump

    The 2016 elections in the United States of America, USA, have come and gone, what is left now are the ripple-effects of that election. The election will long be remembered as the most divisive and shocking presidential race in modern US history as conventional wisdom and political science were proved wrong with the outcome of the election.
    Historic was the emergence of Hillary Clinton, a woman, former senator and one-time secretary of state, as candidate for the Democratic Party. Also historic was the emergence of Donald Trump, real estate mogul and billionaire TV celebrity on the platform of the Republican Party. The emergence of the two candidates didn’t really excite American voters. A survey conducted earlier by the Pew Research Centre found far more respondents felt frustrated (57 per cent), disgusted (55 per cent), interested (31 per cent). Only 10 per cent felt excited by the involvement of both candidates. A publication by the New York Times poll also had it that 80 per cent of Americans were disgusted with the election.
    By March 2015 it had become public knowledge that during her tenure as United States Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton had used her family’s private e-mail server for official communication, including thousands of e-mail that would be marked classified by the State Department. Experts argued that her use of private e-mail messaging and server violated State Department protocols, federal laws and regulations guiding record keeping. Hillary would struggle profusely during the entire campaign to find explanation.
    Similarly, Donald Trump could not be judged a saint in his public outlook. He ran one of the lousiest presidential campaigns ever. This man fractured his own party. His convention was a fiasco. He had no ground game to speak of. He needlessly offended countless groups of people: women, Hispanics, Muslims, disabled people, mothers of crying babies, the Bush family, among others. Generally, the two candidates did not actually appeal to the public, but somehow, Trump was able to snatch victory from his rival via electoral college votes.
    To win the election, out of 538 total electoral college votes, 270 are needed. Swing states are the battlegrounds where the election is fought. Issues in swing states tend to influence the campaign message. Racial diversity has remained a dominant feature as non-whites vote Democrat while Republican voters are mostly whites. Top on the list of issues in these swing states were immigration, and marijuana legalisation. It was clear from the onset that whoever wins more in these battleground states, in addition to securing the states that are perceived as party-safe domains, would ride to the White House in victory.
    A combination of factors undoubtedly influenced the outcome of the election. In the last days of the campaigns, Trump remained unshaken and fervent in his winning bid. But what tilted the voters and guaranteed victory for the flaxen-haired Republican candidate was his campaign strategy which seems to have eluded the predictive powers of political pundits.
    It is striking that the democratic candidate embraced President Obama’s policies. Hillary tagged her campaign “Stronger Together”, and vowed to build on Obama’s Obamacare health coverage. Trump vowed to repeal it. Clinton approved of President Obama’s executive policy to document and prevent millions of undocumented immigrants from deportation. In contrast, Trump pledged to deport them. In embracing these initiatives, Clinton’s aim was to reconstitute the 2012 Obama winning coalition of minorities, social liberals, women, African-Americans and average American working middle class. In this calculation, as events later proved, she was obviously trapped in the past and ignorant of the changing demographic permutations.
    In contrast, all through the campaign, Trump remained vocal in his condemnation of the Obama government as an era of bad policies, bad judgments, and failed state of affairs and promised to “Make America Great Again.” Trump’s vocal, courageous positions on topical issues, succeeded in tagging Hillary as an extension of the failed local and international policies of Obama’s presidency.
    He vowed to build a wall on the southern border with Mexico and make Mexico pay for it; temporarily ban Muslims from entering the United States; bring manufacturing jobs which have been outsourced to foreign countries back; impose tariffs on goods made in China and Mexico; cut taxes with the top 0.1 per cent receiving more tax relief; and bomb or take the oil from ISIS in the Middle East, among others. Though some of these sounded ridiculous and seemed to lack rational reasoning, but his popularity soared in the suburbs. His outspokenness may have appealed to a silent, hidden majority, which rather spoke loudly with their electoral votes.
    Trump’s defiance of expectations was greatly influenced by growing lack of trust, as Americans doubted Clinton’s sincerity in the raging abuse of office, and enrichment of the Clinton Foundation. These must have tipped undecided voters in favour of Trump. And of course, the social media played a strategic role of aiding communication in the 2016 elections. WikiLeaks, the hacking group publications leading to the elections was very damaging and Russia was alleged to have encouraged hacking of confidential information to influence the election in favour of Trump. The inability of the Clinton campaign to confirm or deny validity of these emails, emboldened Trump to severally label the democratic candidate, “crooked Hillary” and repeatedly called her a “liar”. In the second debate, Trump even promised that if he became president, Clinton would be in jail. In many of Trump’s rallies, crowds were heard chanting, “Lock her up.”
    The democrats were blinded to the growing number of unaffiliated independent–minded voters. This demography surged to give Trump the keys to the White House in a victory as Trump hit the ceiling with the whites’ votes. Over 67 per cent of non-college whites voted Trump. Against democratic calculations, Hillary was unable to secure any close margin of African-Americans, women, young voters’ turnout and votes – a coalition that gave record numbers for Obama’s victory in the past. Arguably, Hispanic votes in favour of Clinton could not offset the massive gains Trump made with white voters from Florida to North Carolina to Pennsylvania.
    Frankly, the election was not fought or lost with Hispanic votes, but had to do with whites, suburban voters and women supporting Trump than anyone anticipated. People dismissed Trump as such a lousy candidate, an embarrassment to the Republican Party, the greatest accusation being that he combines policy ignorance with an impressive lack of common sense. But his voters did not take him literally as they took him seriously. These astonishing changes may well be viewed as one set ground zero for political bombshell. Trump secured most states the Republicans were predicted to win, took the most contested states of Florida, Ohio, Iowa, Pennsylvania to capture 279 electoral votes, having polled 59,690,096 votes, as against Clinton’s majority popular vote of 59,916,932 votes.
    What happened last Tuesday was simply a disaster because there is a darkness about Trump that negates what America stands for; a folly so bewildering and an incompetence so profound that has made the entire world sceptical and jittery about his coming presidency. Trump’s victory makes it look as if Hillary was exactly the wrong candidate for that election; a technocrat who offered fine-tuning when the country needed a sledgehammer to rid it of its troubles.
    Perhaps, there is a bright side to Trump’s victory. After all, there was a reason that tens of millions of “good” people voted for him and maybe, he will live up to their expectations. But let nobody be deceived; miracles happen and except one occurs, it is doubtful if America and the rest of the globe will win anything as President Trump goes about settling scores with real and imaginary enemies. We just have to contend with a Donald Trump as president of the United States of America, for, at least, the next four years, beginning from January 20, 2017.

  • Enter President Trump

    FIRST, to eat the humble pie: I was wrong in my projection – mark it: not prediction – last week that Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton would win the United States presidential election. No hair splitting is intended here, but there is a distinction between projections and predictions. Projections are evidence based and logically derived. On the other hand, predictions, like prophecies, range from being truly divinely inspired to being downright whimsical and merely pretentious to arcane insight. That is the stock of the psychic tribe, like the T. B. Joshuas of this world.
    Rational projection on any endgame simply is punditry. And the last time I checked, it was perfectly admissible intellectually to play the pundit. But pundits do have their bad day, and I had mine last week. So, let’s move on. Maybe I owe some explanation, though, of the rationale for my projection on the American election that went so terribly wrong.
    I make no pretenses about my personal wish that Hillary carried the day in that election, and any seeming evidence of that likelihood bolstered my courage to openly take a stand. But it is universal knowledge now that Hillary didn’t win the U. S. election. Republican nominee Donald Trump did, and resoundingly too, in an epic upset that locates him to take office on January 20th, 2017, as the 45th President of the United States. It was as well an electoral sweepstake that saw the Republicans retaining the control of both chambers of the U. S. congress.
    Without prejudice to the choice American voters have made, which is now law, it had seemed improbable that Mr. Trump would wade all the tides that beset his candidature. Actually, leading up to Election Day, there were reasons to think the tycoon-turned-politician was headed for a punishing electoral defeat.
    To begin with, he is the first in his country’s entire history without scant experience in political office or military service to attain the presidency: a real estate developer and reality television star, coming in from the wintry world of business. At 70 years, he will be the oldest to be inaugurated to his first term in the top job. But easily the most formidable chink in his political armour were self-sabotaging eruptions that dogged his electioneering. And we could just recap samples here.
    In a country founded by immigrants, and where Latinos along with other minority groups formed a quantum of the voting population, Mr. Trump entered the presidential race swinging at Mexican immigrants whom he dubbed rapists and criminals. He also vowed erecting a frontier wall on the southern border with Mexico. On campaign trail, he proposed a ban against Muslims entering the United States. And he wasn’t shy putting it on record that he would mass deport illegal immigrants if he becomes President. Now, that is not counting the many misogynistic slips, which ordinarily should alienate female voters.
    The potential challenge to Trump’s candidature wasn’t limited to his personal traits, there was also the dysfunction of his party platform. The Republican establishment so underrated his political value that the party palpably flinched at handing him its ticket. And when sheer voter power threw him up as the nominee, the party viewed his emergence with helpless trepidation and near-fatalist resignation to what seemed to it its dimmest chance ever of getting a serious shot at the White House. The party establishment was at such odds with Mr. Trump that, against the run of historical practice, Republican leaders hobbled on promoting his candidature. And following the leak early October of an old recording of the reality star bragging about improper contact with women, the party platform swiftly cut lose from the Trump ticket, in apparent fear that he could well drag Republican congressional candidates facing their own elections down with himself.
    Those factors considered, Mr. Trump seemed an improbable winner in an election tightly fought with another candidate who was apparently politically grilled, and who ran on a united party platform bolstered by a keen power of incumbency. But that wasn’t even the sole basis for my faulty projection. Polling of potential voters is an integral part of electoral practice in the West, and virtually all reputed pollsters on the American election for many months before Election Day projected a Clinton win.
    The trend, to boot, was by no means limited to American pollsters. On the eve of the November 8 election, Clinton was ahead by four points in a British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) aggregate of opinion polls, even though that projection fell within the stated margin of error. Not that it was the first time the polls were wrong: the polls were widely off mark on the 2015 British elections, and as well on the Brexit referendum in June, this year. So, why were the polls so wrong again?
    Data analysts in the West are yet probing for answers, but it seems agreed as it were that true voter behaviour can hardly be gauged with accuracy ahead of polling. “We treat polls like weather forecasts, but voters are inherently unpredictable…Politics can feel as unpredictable as the weather…But those are two very different kinds of forecasts. One is based on natural science, the other on social science. People are different from planets – they can change their minds, they can decide to not share their opinions or they can flat-out lie. And that’s before you even get to some of the statistical issues that make polling inaccurate,” data journalist Mona Chalabi wrote in the UK Guardian last week.
    A mollified pollster named Mike Murphy was so disillusioned that he vented his grievance on his Twitter handle, @murphymike. “I’ve believed in data for 30 years in politics, and data died tonight. I could not have been more wrong about this election,” he said.
    Mr. Trump winning the U. S. presidential election came down to one thing: voter power. Pollsters obviously underestimated the number of hidden Trump voters – people who stormed the polling precincts on Election Day but never showed up on survey radar. A self-proclaimed lover of polls himself, Mr. Trump, before the results emerged last week, said he no longer believed most of them. “I do think a lot of the polls are purposely wrong. I don’t even think they interview people, I think they just put out phony numbers,” he told journalists.
    Well, let me be clear that I yet think Mr. Trump’s victory in the American election did not make his bullish pedagogy right. But the beauty of democracy is for voters to have their way – however their choice may seem. And there are useful lessons to learn from Trump’s doggedness and cult following among the American electorate, which successfully upended the Washington establishment in a voters’ revolt.
    In the face of a cold shoulder from his party, and a forest of survey data suggesting he was on the back foot, Trump defiantly affirmed he would win the election, and he won. He needed a near-perfect run through the swing states, and he got it – taking Ohio, North Carolina and Florida, among others. But he didn’t go pursuing victory by seeking to compromise the system, he rather dug in with voters. And from voting demographics, it has emerged that his appeal resonated with a largely overlooked bloc of blue-collar whites and working-class voters who felt the American promise had eluded them, and who found in Trump a champion.
    Every attempt anywhere to pervert due process of the electoral system is directly indicative of disregard for the electorate. But supremacy of voters is the very essence and hallmark of democracy, and that is a virtue we must continually strive to entrench even in our own experience here in Nigeria. On this score, it is clear the U. S. elections have again shown the way.

  • At last, President Trump!

    Against all odds, real and contrived barriers, predictions and prescriptions, against all rules of political correctness, decorum and civility, against unquestionable hostility from mainstream media and stiff opposition from the so-called Washington D.C. establishment, millionaire real estate mogul Donald Trump has emerged as President-elect of the United States of America. He has, as one commentator had earlier predicted, succeeded in “insulting his way into the White House.” He will take over from Barack Obama, on January 20, 2017 as the 45th elected President of unmistakably the most powerful country on the planet, after having engaged in the bitterest, nastiest, sardonic, most acrimonious, ruthless, divisive and incendiary electioneering campaigns like none Americans have ever before seen or experienced.

    Though not necessarily a glass-ceiling shattering event, his electoral victory is nonetheless remarkable and truly history-making: unlike most occupants of the exalted office of President of the United States, he had never before held public political or administrative office, never served in the armed forces. And, I must add, he won the prize against the backdrop of the most inflammatory and often malevolent campaign rhetoric that smacked of gangsterist diplomacy (an oxymoron) and gave the rest of the world jitters, if not nightmares – anti-Muslim and other hate speeches, profiling Mexicans and Latinos as criminals and drug pushers, characterization Black Africans as good-for-nothing, lazy, sex-crazed criminals, insisting he would bring back torture, water-boarding and killing of families of anyone America classifies as terrorist. He eulogized Vladimir Putin as a great leader, better than Obama; railed and ranted against the Chinese and advocated trade protectionism; claimed America would retrench from its long-standing NATO commitments which had made America the great global power that it had been since the end of WWII; he asserted he was not be incommoded by nuclear proliferation if Japan and others had their nuclear weapons; in general that the US might withdraw from internationalism into isolationism all over again, a move that would give China and Russia the requisite leeway to take over global leadership.

    It is still too early in the day to speculate whether he will be able to do any of these once he settles into office and the humongous and immensely complex realities of world politics begin to stare him in the face. His baptism of fire will begin during the transition period. The next two months before being his swearing in this coming January will severely test his knowledge of politics, economics, domestic and international security and world affairs in general, most especially his patience and attentiveness as he will have to undergo grueling sessions of daily briefing, and as he struggles to put together his cabinet team, and decides on the thousands of presidential appointments to be made. It is hoped that his legendary lack of patience will not be a hindrance to him and that he will be able endure and grasp the intricate details of daily intelligence briefings by the NSA and CIA and others, or he might simply play into the hands of ambitious intelligence and national security apparatchiks who ordinarily would prefer to conceal some things from him. A casual reading of the history of both the CIA and NSA will reveal several instances of actions and operations undertaken across the globe that were cleverly hidden from presidential authorization and even congressional scrutiny.

    In his politics, little of which is known and understood till now except as exemplified by his year-long electioneering campaigns, Donald Trump has never really come across as a team-player and party loyalist: he literally hijacked the Republican Party and converted it into his own; alienated most of the GOP big-wigs and even put the political survival of its elected congressional members at grave risk; bitterly squabbled with everyone who didn’t agree with him; exhibited bitter and toxic temperament and lack of patience and concentration; and he was deliberately abusive, rude and vitriolic in his responses to comments and criticisms and took no prisoners.

    Whilst the jubilation goes on and many are reeling from the evident shock, perceptive observers of American politics and international relations are agitated and unsure what the next four years portend for the rest of the world. How and in what directions will American foreign policy move remain matters for intelligent speculation, as this unprecedented victory has implications and consequences for America’s role and leadership in global affairs. Will the US retrench from or abdicate its leadership of the Western world and the Atlantic alliance in the face of a rampaging Russia’s hegemonic outreach in Eastern Europe, the Baltic and the Middle East? How, for example, will a Trump presidency respond to China’s moves in the South China Sea? What about China’s role in the BRICS trying to challenge the dollarized global economy? What is Africa’s fate under President Trump, against the backdrop of America’s creeping re-colonization and militarization of the continent through the expanding AFRICOM? Questions, and still more questions! What about the series of complex emergencies, crises and wars in the Middle East: Iraq, Syria, Yemen; the burgeoning threats to Saudi Arabia, and of course endless wars in Afghanistan? How does Trump intend to handle the tensions generated by the hostility between two Asian nuclear-weapon nations of India and Pakistan? What about Libya, Egypt and the rest of North Africa? Will Japan be encouraged to develop its own nuclear weapon capability? If so, what happens to the menace posed by the hermitically sealed North Korea and the ambitious Islamic Republic of Iran? Can the US totally recoil from its internationalist foreign policy? And if, so what are the implications for the rest of the world?

    The next few years will severely tax and test our intellect and analytical skills to fathom what this Trump victory portends. Britain is facing as yet uncertain future and consequences from the Brexit vote. It was never the intent of its protagonists to win but merely to obtain sufficient political leverage to exact more concessions from the European Union. Whether the United Kingdom will remain a single united country for much longer after its final exit from the EU is debatable. Is America truly prepared for Trump’s foreign policy?

    I had observed in an earlier article in this newspaper (“America Truly Deserves Donald Trump!” The Nation, Tuesday, April 26) that though one of the beauties of democracy is popular participation in leadership selection, it is fraught with the problem that wrong choices can also be made. Even though I cannot yet be categorical that Americans have made a wrong choice, there is no question in my mind as I had argued then, that by what we know thus far of his well known toxic brand of politics, Donald Trump has deliberately stoked and fanned “the dangerous embers of racial hatred, religious intolerance, Islamophobia, ethnic-baiting, racial profiling, and xenophobia, that will haunt America for a long time to come.” All we can do is wait, watch, and pray as the same man will, come January 2017, become the next Commander-in-Chief of a vast military machine that parades unquestionably the most formidable nuclear arsenal on earth. God help us!

     

    • Prof. Fawole writes from Obafemi Awolowo University, ILe-Ife.