Tag: President

  • Southeast governors welcome President

    The South East Governors Forum has welcomed President Muhammadu Buhari back to Nigeria after his medical vacation in the United Kingdom (UK).

    Chairman of the Forum and Ebonyi State Governor David Umahi on behalf of the forum, thanked God for granting the president a divine healing.

    Umahi, in a statement signed by his Chief Press Secretary, Mr. Emmanuel Uzor, described the President’s healing as a great work of God and wished him total recovery as he resumes duty.

    “I thank Nigerians for praying for the speedy recovery of the president.  This shows that they are becoming more patriotic despite varying political lines.

    “I call for more prayers and dedication to service from Nigerians because we can only achieve greatness through unity of purpose,” the statement read.

    The forum cautioned against hate speeches by Nigerians and reiterated its readiness to protect lives and property of every Nigerian irrespective of tribe or religion.”

  • While the President was away

    While the President was away

    In this report, Dapo Olufade takes a look at what happened while the president was on medical leave.

    RUMOUR. Controversy. Threats. Countermands. Emotion. Fury. Theatrics.

    None was in short supply in the country in the 103 days President Muhammadu Buhari spent in London, attending to his health.

    Dutifully dispensing them at measured intervals were the politicians, political jobbers and mischief makers.

    Once a controversy appeared to have served its course and began to wear out, another would suddenly pop-up, sending the populace into a fresh frenzy.

    First was the storm over his Eid el Fitri message on the Hausa Service of the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) on June 25.

    How dare he address Nigerians in Hausa, many charged, after demanding that he should say something, just anything, to assure the nation that what they were hearing about him was not true.

    The Sallah message broadcast was preceded by a statement issued by his media team.

    The presidency only released the audio in an apparent response to distrustful Nigerians who had not heard from Buhari for nearly two months.

    Governor Ayodele Fayose of Ekiti State categorically declared the audio message a fraud.

    Buhari, according to him, could not have spoken the words contained in the tape because he had it “on good authority” that the President had been “on life support since June 6.”

    He told reporters at a so called ‘world press conference’ in Ado Ekiti that he had in his possession 11 photographs  of the President on life support in a London hospital, and would release them to the public ‘soon’.

    He said: “The audio message does not represent the truth as our President does not only have voice impairment; he has been on life support since June 6, 2017 at a West-End, London Hospital.

    “Of a fact, our First Lady, Mrs. Aisah Buhari was not allowed to see her husband during her last visit to the United Kingdom if only she will be courageous enough to admit.

    “Only three Nigerians who are of the President’s cabal are allowed access to the President. I will keep their identities for now.”

    As if taking a cue from Fayose, an online publication ran its own account of Buhari’s “bad condition.”

    He was not allowed to see “his wife (Aisha) during her recent visit to the United Kingdom,” it said quoting presidency sources.

    It also said Buhari had “not spoken to Acting President Yemi Osinbajo for several weeks following his departure from Abuja for a second round of medical treatment.

    “The sources gave the example of Wednesday last week when members of Buhari’s cabal called the Acting President and asked him to await a call from the ailing President, pointing out that no such call was received except one that was just a few seconds of hellos before the person hung up the phone.”

    In a follow up story on Osinbajo’s visit to Buhari in London in early July, the online publication reported that the meeting “lasted for five minutes only according to Presidency officials in the know of what transpired between the two leaders at the Abuja House in London.”

    It also said Buhari “has a major difficulty speaking audibly as his treatment continues.”

    A few days later, the National Chairman of the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC), Chief John Odigie-Oyegun, and Governors Umaru Al-Makura (Nasarawa), Nasir el-Rufai (Kaduna), Rochas Okorocha (Imo), and Yahaya Bello (Kogi), visited Buhari in London in a bid to put a lie to speculations about the President’s health.

    Former Aviation minister and PDP member, Mr. Femi Fani-Kayode refused to be persuaded by the photographs of the meeting that went into circulation.

    Like Fayose before him, he said they were manipulated.

    His ‘sources’, he claimed had told him that the photographs were old ones, taken when Buhari was breaking the fast with the people seen in the photographs.

    He had another evidence of the ‘deception’: drinks on the dining table were Nigerian products.

    He said: “I have been reliably informed that the picture was taken in Abuja some time back and not yesterday in London.

    “Quite apart from that, even though the picture was meant to have been taken in London curiously all the drinks on the table are Nigerian products and Nigerian-made.

    “Did the Governors take all those drinks along with them to London when they went to see the President?

    “What was the purpose and point of this fake photo-shoot and this strange breakfast meeting? What was the purpose and objective of this monumental fraud and deceit?

    “Whatever the answers may be to these questions the curtain must be brought down on what can only be described as a puerile and nauseating conspiracy.

    “For those who still believe that the meeting actually took place there are some nagging questions that need to be answered.

    “For example why were the Nigerian and foreign media not allowed to cover the proceedings and participate in this celebrated photo-shoot and merry London feast?

    “Why did the Villa press corps not take one of their own camera men to London and make a short video of the event?

    “Why was the whole event shrouded in so much secrecy? Why is it that only one picture was taken? Why were more pictures not taken? Why was Buhari not put on audio tape and recorded talking to his guests?”

    The answer soon came when a delegation of APC and PDP governors left for London to visit Buhari.

    Others,  including the Archbishop of Canterbury, members of Buhari’s Media team, Senate President Bukola Saraki, House of Representatives Speaker Yakubu Dogara and the General Overseer Worldwide of the Redeemed Christian Church of God (RCCG), Pastor Adejare Adeboye took turns to bid Buhari get well soon.

    In early July, the Senate sparked a controversy of its own when some members moved to make Senate President Bukola Saraki Acting President of the country.

    The Red Chamber had, on resumption from a three week recess, received a letter from Osinbajo seeking the confirmation of Mr. Lanre Gbajabiamila, as Director General of National Lottery Regulatory Commission.

    Incidentally, Osinbajo was briefly out of the country that day, prompting Senator Eyinanya Abaribe (Abia South), to say the country had no President or Acting President at that moment.

    Saraki appeared to have read the mood of the majority of senators and of the nation and tactically ruled him out of order before the situation could degenerate

    The leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Nnamdi Kanu and some Northern youths would not allow the politicians monopolize the limelight.

    Kanu, in utter violation of his bail conditions, addressed rally after rally in the South East, insisting that he and the Igbo must get out of Nigeria.

    He shut down major towns in the South East on May 30 to mark Biafra day and vowed to stop the November 18 governorship election in Anambra, unless there is a referendum on the future of ‘Biafra’.

    In early June, 16 northern youth groups emerging from a joint meeting in Kaduna gave Igbo residing in North up to October 1, 2017 to vacate the region.

    In no time, fresh agitation for Nigeria’s restructuring swept through the country.

    Even, the North which many Nigerians see as being afraid of restructuring told everyone who cared to listen that it is ready for it.

    The Governors of the Northern states and the traditional rulers met in Kaduna and resolved to set up a committee to harmonize the views of the people for action at the appropriate time.

    But the hatred sparked by the quit notice has been a little difficult to suppress.

    Acting President Osinbajo met with leaders from the North and the South to douse the tension, only for some hate songs to emerge in parts of the country.

    There was also a threat by Niger Delta militants to resume hostilities by the end of September if the federal government failed to fulfil its promises to the region.

    A similar threat by Niger Delta elders to pull out of further talks with government prompted a peace meeting in Abuja with Osinbajo leading the government delegation.

    Agreements were reached, compromises made, and peace returned.

    For now, the sticking point in the social sector is the ASUU strike launched last week.

    Government has admitted responsibility for failing to meet its part of the agreement earlier reached with the lecturers and now hopes that the teachers will return to the classrooms this week when all the issues in contention will have been sorted out.

  • I’m “President in-waiting”, says Fayose

    I’m “President in-waiting”, says Fayose

    Ekiti State Governor Peter Ayodele Fayose is famous for his controversies. On Saturday, ahead of President Muhammed Buhari’s arrival from London,  Fayode declared himself as Nigeria’s president in-waiting.

    He spoke at the Jolly Nyame Stadium, Jalingo –the Taraba State capital during the funeral service of former Governor Danbaba Danfulani Suntai.

    The Ekiti governor came when all other dignitaries were seated and the occasion had begun.

    He waved at the gathering, acknowledging cheers which briefly interrupted the service.

    He wore a white garment with brief arms and white half-shoe to match.

    As he strode in, some people initially had mistaken him for former President Goodluck Jonathan, in spite of their stark difference in body frame and height.

    Leading Governor Ibrahim Hassan Dankwambo of Gombe State and Plateau State Governor Simon Lalong to the podium to offer their condolences and tributes, Fayose stirred a melodrama.  Twice, he called himself president in-waiting.

    He humorously thanked the moderator, GT Kataps for giving him the chance to step on the podium.

    “Thank you for giving me the chance. Maybe I am the president in-waiting,” he said. There was a thunder of laughter and cheers from the audience.

    As he made his speech, members of a women choral group began to make noise. “Women should not make noise, especially when a president in-waiting is talking,” he said. Again, he was cheered up by fans.

    He based his tribute on “courage and fearlessness” which he is known for, which were also attributes of late former Governor Danbaba Danfulani Suntai.

    But when it was the turn of the Plateau State Governor Simon Lalong to speak, he told Fayose that there was no qualm since his presidency was a waiting type.

    Lalong said: “Thank God you are a waiting president. You will wait for my President, Gen. Muhammadu Buhari; he is returning today; you will welcome him.”

    It was a few hours after Lalong’s speech that President Buhari arrived the Presidential wing of the Nnamdi Azikiwe International Airport.

    Lalong is of the All Progressives Congress (APC), while Fayose is of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP).

    Fielding questions from newsmen, Fayose said he attended Suntai’s funeral because the deceased was an achiever, and particularly when Governor Darius Ishaku of the PDP won his election in the court he celebrated the victory in Ekiti too.

  • IoD gets new President/Council chair

    The Institute of Directors (IoD) Nigeria has elected Alhaji Ahmed Rufai Mohammed, as its new President/Chairman of Council. This emerged after its Governing Council meeting which held shortly after the Institute’s 2017 Annual General Meeting (AGM)  in Lagos.

    Alhaji Mohammed, who succeeds Mr. Yemi Akeju, F.IoD as the 15th president, is a professional investment manager and seasoned administrator with over 30 years of experience in project development and portfolio management. He is currently the Executive Vice Chairman of Northbridge Investment and Trust Ltd , Chairman Northbridge Micro Finance Bank Ltd  and a Director on the Group board of Royal Exchange Plc.

    The new IoD President is an alumnus of Ahmadu Bello University (ABU) Zaria and Manchester Business School, UK  He served at the Kano State Investment and Properties Limited soon after graduation in 1976 where he rose from an Investment Executive to become the Organisation’s Finance Controller in 1984. In 1991, he joined the biggest public sector Pension Fund in the country, Nigeria Social Insurance Trust Fund, as Assistant General Manager and became General Manager (Investment and Treasury) in 1993. In 2002, he became the Managing Director/CEO  of the Organisation and retired in 2007.

  • Ogoni dare Fed Govt over oil giant’s return

    Ogoni dare Fed Govt over oil giant’s return

    The President of the Movement for the Survival of the Ogoni People (MOSOP), Chief Legborsi Saro Pyagbara, is always saying that Nigeria will be a better country, if other Nigerians can emulate Ogoni people’s non-violent struggle.

    On August 4, Ogoni people defied the heavy rain to massively protest the resumption of crude oil production and laying of new pipes in the neglected/marginalised area, after over 24 years of sending the oil giant packing from Ogoniland.

    The protesters, comprising elderly men, women and youths, who were armed with placards, bearing various inscriptions, drumming and singing anti-Shell songs, were led by the president of MOSOP.

    The displeased protesters took off from Kpobie Junction in Gokana on the ever-busy Bori-Saakpenwa Road and trekked amid downpour for about five kilometres to Biara, in the same Gokana LGA, the site of laying of new pipes by SPDC and moved into the muddy forest, covering about 20 kilometres, to the last point with exposed pipelines about being laid, before connecting Bera-Ogoni in Gokana LGA, through a narrow forest path, still in heavy rain.

    Sighting the advancing protesters, the Nigerian and expatriate workers of Anasami Construction Nigeria Limited, the Shell’s contractor handling the laying of new pipes, took to their heels, abandoning four bulldozers and other equipment, which were not damaged by the aggrieved Ogoni people.

    As the protesters were moving round Ogoni communities, fully-armed soldiers and policemen in many Toyota Hilux patrol vans were driving/moving behind them, to prevent the breakdown of law and order,  with Nigerian Army’s Armoured Personnel Carrier (APC), marked NA 381 AO1, stationed at Kpobie Junction.

    Pyagbara was accompanied by an alternate representative of Ogoni stakeholders in the Governing Council of the Hydrocarbon Pollution Remediation Project (HYPREP), Mr. Kammy Ngelale, and the National Coordinator of a socio-political pressure group, the Ken Saro-Wiwa Associates, Chief Gani Topba, among other prominent Ogoni leaders, who kicked against the return of SPDC to Ogoniland.

    Some of the placards read: “No broad-based discussion, no oil production in Ogoni”, “We say yes to clean-up and we say no to laying of oil pipelines in Ogoni now”, “FG, Shell, NPDC are dubious and murderers. We say no to your antics”, “MOSOP says no to Shell in Ogoniland”, “NPDC, Shell, FG insincere and unfair to Ogoni people. We say no to divide and rule”, “Resumption of oil extraction in Ogoni through the back door is evil. Go home now”, “Our environment is our life. No more pollution of the Ogoni environment” and “FG, Shell, NPDC fanning the embers of violence in Ogoni.”

    Other placards included: “Shell, FG, NPDC undermining Ogoni security and survival, leave us alone”, “FG, Shell, NPDC, release money for Ogoni clean-up, not pipelines sponsorship”, “Our environment is ruined, can no longer stand oil production. Stop the work now”, “FG,  Shell, NPDC, don’t cause crisis in Ogoni” and “We say yes to clean-up and say no to laying of oil pipelines now.”

    Topba declared during the protest that SPDC had not been fair to Ogoni people, while polluting Ogoniland, before it was sent packing and would never be allowed to return to the area.

    The national coordinator of Ken Saro-Wiwa Associates said: “The protest is a total move by Ogoni people. In days ahead, things more than this will happen. What is key and which Nigerians must understand is that Ogoni people are prepared for resumption of oil production in the four Ogoni LGAs, but you cannot replace Shell with the Nigerian Petroleum Development Company (NPDC), which is worse than Shell.

    “The United Nations Environment Programme’s (UNEP’s) report on the environmental assessment of Ogoniland, presented to the then President Goodluck Jonathan in Abuja on August 4, 2011, without implementation of the far-reaching recommendations, until after President Muhammadu Buhari was inaugurated on May 29, 2015, has expired. The only thing the Federal Government can do now is re-assessment.

    “As the clean-up of Ogoniland is being done, in line with UNEP’s recommendations, oil production can resume, but it must be done by a competent company that will be on the same page with what our leaders died for, because there is a blueprint on how Ogoniland can be developed. Shell and NPDC cannot come to Ogoni.

    “The people of Ogoniland will meet and agree on a competent company, but it cannot be immediately. The Federal Government should first revoke the legal licence of Shell, because Ogoni people withdrew the social licence in 1993. By 2019, Shell’s legal licence will expire. Between now and 2019, Shell cannot take Ogoni oil. Ogoni people can discuss with another competent company, but not NPDC or Shell, after the revocation of SPDC’s legal licence.

    “If the Federal Government refuses to withdraw the military personnel, policemen and other security agents they are using to protect the pipelines and laying of new pipes, what will happen in days ahead is that Ogoni people will come to the pipelines with their pots, they will cook soup and food, eat and remain there, until the government of Nigeria listens to them.”

    MOSOP, on August 1 this year, gave the Federal Government and Shell a seven-day ultimatum to cease engagements on resuming oil production in Ogoni.

    It vowed to resist the divide and rule tactics of SPDC and the Federal Government, through NPDC, the oil production arm of the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC).

    The umbrella organisation of Ogoni people, while giving the ultimatum during a news conference at its secretariat, off Ken Saro-Wiwa (formerly Stadium) Road, Port Harcourt, declared that the actions of the officials of the Federal Government and Shell had the potential of igniting a blaze of conflict and violence that would skirt the forcible attempt to return to Ogoniland.

    Shell’s Spokesman, Joe Ollor Obari, however, stated that SPDC stopped oil production in Ogoni in1993 and had no plan to return to oil production there.

    The MOSOP president, while addressing the protesters at Kpobie Junction, said: “We are at a time of national emergency, because of certain developments that are happening in Ogoniland, that we are not happy with. On August 26, 1990, our fathers and mothers came together and put in place the famous Ogoni Bill of Rights (OBR). Critical in the OBR is the issue of the stoppage of Ogoni environment from degradation. We initiated a lot of non-violent actions that forced Shell out of Ogoni in April/May 1993. Since then,  Shell was declared personal non grata in Ogoni.

    “We have not asked Shell to come back. We are seeing tendencies in the last few months about Shell trying to force its way back to Ogoni and we are saying no. The fire of the Ogoni struggle must continue to burn. We are demonstrating to the whole world, through non-violent strategy that our fathers taught us.

    “MOSOP is committed to peaceful struggle and we are not about changing it. When we marched on January 4, 1993, we did not throw stone at anybody. Because we did not throw stone yesterday, we are not going to throw stone today. We are not going to burn or destroy anything. Ogoni is known for non-violent protests. The latest action of Shell is not approved by the Ogoni people.

    “This is just the beginning of non-violent actions that we are planning in the coming days. There will be bigger protests in few weeks, if the Federal Government refuses to respond to the issues that we have raised. If you want to talk about resumption of oil production in Ogoni, you must come to the table. We must all discuss and bring to the fore, the issues that were raised by the founding fathers of the struggle, relating to oil production in Ogoniland.

    “You cannot move into Ogoni today, because you feel that you have the soldiers and guns, but our fathers told us yesterday to dance the guns to silence. Let nobody fear any gun or threat.”

    Pyagbara, after addressing the teeming protesters, led them to the site of laying the new pipes, stressing that the aim was to stop the contractor from further working, until there was discussion with Ogoni people, through MOSOP.

    While again addressing the protesters in the forest, at the site of the laying of pipes, the MOSOP president said: “They say when the owners of the land and property come, strangers will run away. They (workers of Shell’s contracting firm) have run away. We are here because this is our land. Some people feel that they can move with impunity into our land, but we are saying no.

    “When they tried it in 1993, we did not keep quiet. We protested and said no. The issues we raised in 1993 are the issues we are still dealing with till today. Nobody has come to tell us about the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) of laying pipes here. Nobody has told us about the social impact assessment of laying the pipes here.

    “In the modern world today, people are talking about environmental, social and human rights impact assessment. We have not had that on this pipeline and we are saying no.”

    Pyagbara also stated that the forced pull out of SPDC in 1993 was necessitated by the series of non-violent actions, engendered by the Ogoni people, in recognition of the massive environmental pollution that attended Shell’s operations in Ogoniland since 1958, absence of Community Development Agreements (CDAs) and Community Benefit Sharing Agreements (CBSAs) that recognised the rights of communities to Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC).

    He noted that ever since August 26, 1990, when the OBR was launched, the Ogoni people had been striving for effective participation in the development process, as widely obtained globally in the 21st Century, to no avail.

    MOSOP president said: “If there is credible interest in resuming oil production in Ogoni, the Federal Government and the prospective oil companies should together initiate a broad-based discussion with representatives from all sectors of the Ogoni community.

    “Based on the UNEP report, government and companies must undertake a credible EIA of the proposed oil operations in Ogoniland, to include social and health dimension, as well as a public consultation process,  as is the current industry standard.

    “The full implementation of the UNEP report on Ogoniland must be placed on the list, as a pre-condition before and oil exploration commences. Ensure that the Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC) of the Ogoni people is embedded within the framework of any discussion with the oil sector and the government, relating to resumption of oil production in Ogoniland.

    “The Ogoni people had all been involved in the Ogoni struggle and every community in Ogoni had been affected one way or another by the conflict over oil. The attempt by the oil industry and the government to divide the Ogoni nationality along the lines of oil bearing and non-oil bearing is unacceptable and will be resisted.

    “Any agreement that will be agreed upon must be one global all-inclusive agreement, signed by representatives of the Ogoni community and not fragmented and compartmentalised along community lines, as this will certainly cause internal divisions.”

    Pyagbara also informed the people of the world of the potential crisis and violence that the government of Nigeria and Shell/NPDC planned to inflict on the Ogoni people.

    He declared that no oil production could take place in Ogoni, without a clear process of clean-up achieved and broad public discussion about the future of oil operations in Ogoniland attained. The Federal Government must not allow a repeat of the Ogoni crisis, especially between 1993 and 1995, which led to the death of many innocent Ogoni people. A stitch in time saves nine, while a word is enough for the wise.

  • Buhari’s wife returns to London 

    Buhari’s wife returns to London 

    The Wife of the President, Aisha Muhammadu Buhari, on Sunday left Nigeria for the United Kingdom (UK)

    The President, Muhammadu Buhari, had been in the United Kingdom since May 7th to meet up with consultation follow up with his doctors.

    Aisha Buhari, who returned to Nigeria from UK last week, had severally insisted that her husband was recovering fast and will soon return to Nigeria.

    Even though there was no official statement on Aisha’s latest trip, some staff in the Presidency confirmed the latest trip.

  • Survey: President scores 57% in job performance

    Survey: President scores 57% in job performance

    Despite his health challenge, President Muhammadu Buhari’s performance in the last two years has been rated 57 per cent.

    The administration has broken five promises and achieved seven, a report has said.

    But the “number of achieved and ongoing election pledges has increased from one to seven, and 45 to 114 respectively in year one and year two”.

    The approval rating of the anti-corruption war of the government has, however, stood “fairly high at 52%”.

    The economic agenda of the Buhari administration was faulted due to its “inability to translate several monetary and fiscal policies to economic growth and development”.

    The administration was cautioned against the use of dialogue and negotiation in dealing with Boko Haram insurgents.

    The government’s  refusal to obey several court orders demanding the release of a former National Security Adviser, Col. Sambo Dasuki(Retd), Sheikh Ibraheem El-Zakzaky and his wife Zeenat was also described as  a “serious blight on the administration’s commitment to the rule of law.”

    On the agitation for Biafra, the government was urged to go beyond dialogue and negotiation by redressing the developmental issues raised by the Igbo.

    These highlights are contained in a report, titled “Buharimeter Mid-Term Report”, which was compiled by the Centre for Democracy and Development (CDD)- a non-governmental organisation.

    The compilation of the report was sponsored by the UK Department for International Development (DFID) and the Open Society Initiative for Western Africa (OSIWA).

    Signed by the Director of CDD, Idayat Hassan, was based on the 222 pledges made by the President.

    According to the report, the 222 election pledges were carefully sourced from (1) APC Manifesto: An Honest Contract with Nigeria;( 2) My Covenant with Nigeria released by the Campaign Team of the APC presidential candidate, Muhammadu Buhari; and (3) Un-refuted media reports including national newspaper reports and electronic media reports (television and radio) on election promises made by the President during campaign tours.

    The report said: “The Buharimeter Perception Survey reveals that 57% of surveyed Nigerians approve of the job performance of President Buhari, while 40% do not approve of his job performance.

    “Significantly, the 57% job approval has a regional dimension, with those from the northern region viewing Buhari more favourably.

    “ While respondents from the Northwest (85%) and Northeast (66%) constitute the majority of those who approve of his performance, respondents from the Southeast (72%) and Southsouth (60%) make up those who do not approve of his performance.

    “The report indicates that government emphasis in the last two years has been on security. Corruption, agriculture, oil and gas, social safety net and industrialisation have seen progress, but there have been no corresponding interventions in sectors, including education, health, sports and culture, women and youth empowerment. As such, these sectors have performed poorly.”

    The report gave insights into five promises broken by the Buhari administration and the seven broad ones achieved.

    It blamed Buhari for not keeping to his promise to end the rush to travel abroad for medical treatment.

    It said: “The two years’ assessment report reveals that five of the campaign promises have not and cannot be achieved by the incumbent administration. These are ‘broken promises’!

    “The promises include: the commitment to end medical tourism, which has become a routine feat of President Muhammadu Buhari, who is presently being treated in London for an undisclosed ailment; the creation of three million jobs annually; provision of steady power supply to Nigerians between 12 and 18 months of the administration coming into power; the building of one million new houses a year over the next decades; and immediate increase of the national budget to the health sector from 5.5% to 10%.

    “The report shows that the Buhari administration also achieved seven of its campaign promises during its first two years. These promises include: the public declaration of assets and liabilities (though the details are yet to be publicly released); presentation of National Anti-Corruption Strategy; establishment of a good working relationship with state governments in the Northeast, neighbouring countries and the international community in the fight against Boko Haram; introduction of time-limited partial amnesty to rank and file Boko Haram members; review of health policy; introduction of social insurance scheme; and review of the structure of Joint Venture Companies and ensuring transparent tendering process, not managed by federal ministers.

    “A comparative analysis of the performance of PMB in his first two years shows significant progress in terms of promises rated as ‘achieved’ and ‘ongoing’. In the first year Buharimeter report released in July 2016, it was reported that overall performance was low, with the government having achieved only one out of 222 campaign promises, while progress was made towards fulfilling 45 of the promises.

    “However, performance has reasonably improved within the year under review. The total number of achieved and ongoing election pledges has increased from 1 to 7, and 45 to 114 respectively in year one and year two. The report also reveals that promises rated as ‘Not rated’ decreased from 179 to 96.”

    On the state of the nation’s economy, the report rated the Buhari administration low because of its inability to translate several monetary and fiscal policies to economic growth and development in the last two years.

    It stated that only 17% and 1% of Nigerians consider the government’s approach to tackling the economic recession very effective and extremely effective

    It added: “There is no doubt that restoring Nigeria’s economy is a priority for the administration. However, its inability to translate several monetary and fiscal policies to economic growth and development in the last two years raises some concerns.

    “Even the interest rate regime in the monetary market has not made any meaningful impact on the all-time inflation rate. As revealed in the Buharimeter Survey report, in spite of the government’s efforts to tackle the economic recession, most Nigerians do not believe these approaches are effective.

    “Only 17% and 1% of Nigerians consider the government’s approach to tackling the economic recession very effective and extremely effective, respectively. 46% and 36% of surveyed Nigerians consider the government’s approach somewhat effective.

    “The recession continues to impact negatively on the country’s employment and poverty rate as well as food inflation. The Buharimeter Survey further reveals that 9 in 10 Nigerians believe that the recession has resulted in ‘high cost of foodstuff’ (90%) followed by ‘high cost of transportation’ (61%), ‘high cost of house rent and utilities’ (56%) and ‘high cost of school fees’ (55%), among others, which have altogether affected their household negatively.

    “The government’s measures to address poverty and the unemployment rate are made less effective by politicised selection process (especially at state level), inconsistency in registered name and bank details, supply of wrong bank details, improper registration, lack of effective coordination arising from inexperienced focal persons in states, and failure of beneficiaries to present themselves for physical verification.

    “ While it is crucial for government to address all these, it is also important that a commensurate effort should be made to revive education, health and other key sectors.”

    Regarding the anti-corruption war, the report put Nigerians’ assessment of the Buhari administration at 52 per cent, but with a caveat that the approach must be reviewed.

    “It is particularly worrying that despite milestones recorded in the fight against corruption there are still genuine concerns over how the war is being prosecuted. In particular, the anti-graft war is rife with a lack of viable instruments to enforce compliance.

    “It also continues to be prosecuted in an uncoordinated and disjointed manner by several institutions, including the Department of State Services, police, EFCC and ICPC, among others.

    “These institutions need better coordination and increased understanding of their roles and responsibilities. Other challenges include the unlawful detention of suspects and refusal to obey court rulings.

    “ Even so, the approval rating of the anti-corruption war in the Buharimeter Perception Survey conducted by the Buharimeter stands fairly high at 52%; the greater proportion of Nigerians who expressed satisfaction are resident in Northwest (80%), Northeast (61%) and Northcentral (55%).

    “The newly introduced whistle blowing policy, which has helped in the recovery of looted funds, is also popularly received by Nigerians, with 47% of the sampled population in the Buharimeter Survey applauding it. However, it is crucial that a substantive legal framework be immediately provided to strengthen citizens’ engagement in the process.”

    On insecurity nationwide, the report condemned the “laxity” of the Buhari administration in responding to major crises.

    It also warned against the use of dialogue and negotiation in dealing with Boko Haram.

    It advised the government to address developmental issues raised by the Igbo, which have bred the agitations for the State of Biafra.

    The report said: “In terms of fighting insecurity, the government appears to have begun to shift from the state and enemy-centric approach to an approach which uses dialogue and negotiation.

    “While this may achieve laudable results in the case of the Niger Delta, caution should be exercised in employing such a strategy to deal with Boko Haram. “It is recommended that the government adopts an approach which balances the rights of both victims and perpetrators. The report calls on the government to prioritise dealing with ongoing agitations for a state of Biafra.

    “The government should go beyond dialogue and intervention in redressing economic and other development issues in the region, by acknowledging the local grievances from the Biafran War and charting a path towards memorialisation and healing.

    “According to the report, there have been several violations of human rights, due process and lack of respect for the rule of law since the Buhari administration came into office.

    “The government’s refusal to obey several court orders demanding the release of retired Colonel Sambo Dasuki, Sheik Ibraheem El-Zakzaky and his wife Zeenat is a serious blight on the administration’s commitment to the rule of law.

    “The laxity of the administration in responding to several violent conflicts erupting across the country is a source of concern for citizens.

    “For instance, the pastoralist/farmer conflicts plaguing all the six geo-political zones of the country have recorded numerous casualties. In Benue State alone, between 4th August 2015 and 25th April 2017, 37 incidents of pastoralist/farmer conflicts were reported with an estimate of 612 deaths recorded.”

     

  • The president we must have next time

    SIR: I do not think Nigerians should nominate someone for a sensitive position like President without setting out credentials and criteria that informed our choice. The criteria should make primaries easier since those who step forward eventually for the position should have met a substantial proportion of the criteria prior to political party nomination. These credentials may be considered for inclusion in the constitution.

    I do not think that anyone under 60 should vie for the number one position without established inside-out knowledge of Nigeria, without being ICT savvy, without impeccable credentials in public trust, patriotism, nationalism, oratory, high negotiating skills, clean public service records where applicable, perspicacity in vision for the nation and stable family character. He must in addition be a symbol of Nigeria in attitude and carriage in private and public life. He should not have been faulted or doubted as a clean leader through his public and private life.  He must be a professional and not a politician, for politics is not a profession. In fact politics is an endeavour of discovering true leaders and selling such leaders to the electorate for love of nation or state or electorate and what is right and proper; and not for benefiting from such endeavour with pecks of power unless of course such desire is backed up with a discipline or profession.

    A politician should not be rewarded with leadership position for which he does not have appropriate qualification to fill. By a professional, I mean someone who had acquired and discipline and had lived with it for at least 20 years and established goodwill that should attract for him patronage for high fidelity position in power. Leadership should be sufficiently backed up with experience of professional life and distinctly satisfactory human conduct garnishing such a life. A professional in short must live with impeccable integrity in thought, word and deed.

    Nigeria has many people who would easily fit into a mould constructed with these criteria. A good politician should go and find such people and market them to true leaders. But leadership is a different ball game. It is a game for real people with positive credentials only. It is a job for consistent travellers on development journeys in history and in forward perspective which can be deduced for road travelled. An aspirant to power should evoke reverence for his unblemished visibility on the pedestals of right causes. Leadership is that important. It is not a game for triflers and miscreants. It is not a game of experimenters. It is too serious to be left with neophytes in leadership who subvert society and turn around to seek to lead it.

    His circle of friends must be varied and universal. He must have truth and justice as his bastion. He must respect professionalism and use them at all times for sharpening his choice of paradigms for development before embarking upon them. He must neither be prodigal in expenditure nor expensive in taste for symbolic relevance. He must be discreet and humble even in prosperity. He must dine with nobles and retain the common touch.

    He must not be too old to drift into somnolence in prolonged discourse nor too young to be limited in experience profiles required dearly for discussion with leaders of other nations. He must be starkly aware that Nigeria Project comes first in his wakefulness and his sleep. He must discipline himself to the reality of bearing the future of the populace on his shoulders no matter how narrow it physically is. He must be a dreamer, visionary and pragmatist. He must be humble to listen to the lowly and give their needs attention. His yardstick for policy formulation must be the poorest in the community under his umbrage. His ultimate goal is the betterment of the majority at the bottom of the social pyramid.

    It should be fairly easy for political parties or individuals who favour independent candidacy to choose from among their ranks people who meet a significant proportion of these criteria before throwing aspirants up for presidential nomination and election.

     

    • M A C Odu,

    <profmarkodu@yahoo.co.uk>

  • N-Power: SOS to acting President

    SIR: The Social Investment Programme otherwise referred to as N-POWER is commendable and has indeed improved the living conditions of many neglected unemployed graduates of this country. It has also rekindled the lost hope in government and ensured more confidence in the leadership as well as enhanced the popularity of the government. There is a sense of belonging to our new Nigeria. Your Excellency, for the first time in our nation, applicants were selected for such a programme based on merit; against the old norm of man-know-man syndrome. Thanks to the system you put in place to prevent such cankerworm. The programme indeed has been a huge success despite some few hitches here and there; as some selected volunteers have complained of not being paid their stipends as a result of unmatched registered names with banks details, age issues etc. Even at that, and I must applaud the hardworking personal under your office who have rectified some of these issues.

    Notwithstanding the praiseworthiness, usefulness and excellence of the programme, some thousands selected applicants have been disqualified on the ground that they are above 35 years. I for instance was affected as a result of the above criteria.

    I am calling on our humane acting President, and the good people working under you, on behalf of so many applicants affected based on age, to please reconsider us and waive the age criteria and extend it to 50 years, so that quite a good number of people would benefit from the programme. It is a fact that some of us applied, even though, we were above 35 years, but, we believed then as we do now that, laws, rules and conditions are man-made and can be changed from time to time for the good of society just like the age condition in this second phase of the programme is 18-40 as against 18-35 in the first phase of the programme.

    If what I read in the newspaper considering age is true. Interestingly, I was 40 years when I applied in 2016 in the first phase of the programme. Now, I am 41. I am appealing that, I and others who have age issues leading to disqualification should be considered.

    So many of us selected in the first phase of your programme like me, as you read this letter, their profiles have been tagged disqualified as a result of age barrier.

    If our past government had initiated this kind of programme when we graduated so many years ago, when government revenue was so high, we would not be here lamenting to you in this manner on the issue of age. We may have been empowered to empower others by now.

    I am therefore appealing to you, with the uttermost respect, to kindly extend the age specification for those selected in the first phase of the programme to 50 years so that those who are disqualified would be considered.  If you did it for the second phase of programme, I believe you can do it also in the first programme for those whose profiles have been tagged disqualified on ground of age. This change would go a long way to accommodating many jobless graduates above the age of 40 who have suffered untold hardship as a result of insensitivity of some of our leaders.

     

    • Akume Emmanuel Aondofa,

    Benue State.         

  • Fayose urges President to resign

    Fayose urges President to resign

    •Kashamu says call misplaced

    EKITI State Governor Ayodele Fayose has urged President Muhammadu Buhari to resign on account of ill-health.

    According to the governor, the resignation would avail the president enough time to attend to his health and also allow the country to move forward.

    Fayose, who addressed a news conference yesterday in Ado Ekiti, the state capital, said Buhari has been away for 53 days, carpeting presidential aides for shielding the president’s whereabouts from Nigerians.

    The governor said: “Today, it makes 53 days since our President, Muhammadu Buhari, left Nigeria to attend to his health challenges abroad. No official information as to his whereabouts and his state of health.

    “Like every other Nigerian, I do not wish the president dead. I have, therefore, maintained dignified silence since we were told that thePresident embarked on his second medical trip abroad this year.

    “However, the recorded audio message which was released by thePresidency as the President’s Ramadan message to Nigerians necessitated my setting the records straight today. No doubt, the audio message was only a damage-control strategy aimed at further deceiving Nigerians.”

    Fayose alleged that attempts were being made on his life for speaking out on issues of national importance.

    He said: “In closing, let me state that I am not unaware of the various attempts on my life; I am undaunted as I remain committed to truth and fearlessness because a man’s life does not consist in the abundance of his possessions.

    “Dear Nigerians, even though President Buhari needs our prayers and we should keep praying that God takes total control of his situation, it is equally imperative that our leaders must tell us the truth at all times.

    “It is time that the President takes the interests of Nigerians above his own and resign from office so that our country can move forward.”

    But, Senator Buruji Kashamu (Ogun  East) faulted Fayose’s call.

    In a statement issued in Lagos yesterday, the senator stated: “Nigerians overwhelmingly elected President Buhari and if today he is having challenges, it is despicable for any reasonable person to play politics with it because nobody is above health challenges.

    ‘It is unfair and condemnable for Fayose to continue playing God over the President’s health condition; his ridiculous comments are invariably heating up the polity and fanning the embers of disaffection amongst Nigerians.”

     

    Buhari support group to governor: shut up

    The Buhari Media Support Group (BMSG) yesterday criticised Ekiti State Governor Ayo Fayose for dishing out “cacophony of lies on the health of President Muhammadu Buhari”.

    In a statement by its chairmen, Austin Braimoh, and Secretary Cassidy Madueke, the group said it was not surprised by the governor’s coments because of “his penchant for exhibiting the characteristics of a serial liar and a born agent of confusion over the years, who thrives in hate speeches and campaigns of calumny.”

    It added: “BMSG believes that most Nigerians are already familiar with the infantile character of the Ekiti State accidental governor; Nigerians are already familiar with his antics.

    “Fayose operates based on his figment of imagination as he will never disclose his source of information or show proof of his utterances.

    “Today, the same character is telling us that the President is now on life support in London. If his assertions are right, then he needs to be told that it is an improvement to move from being dead to a life support.

    “BMSG, therefore, appeals to the loquacious governor to allow the President recuperate peacefully and return to his duties.”