Tag: primaries

  • Primaries: Shettima, El-Rufi in Ekiti to reconcile APC members

    Borno State Governor Kashim Shettima and his Kaduna State counterpart, Mallam Nasir El-Rufai, are due in Ekiti State today for the reconciliation of party leaders and members still aggrieved by the outcome of the national and state legislative primaries.

    The National Working Committee (NWC) of the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) raised the panel, called the APC Southwest National Peace and Reconciliation Committee, to resolve issues arising from the primaries.

    Shettima is the chairman of Ekiti panel.

    Other members are: El-Rufai, Lagos State Governor Akinwunmi Ambode, former Senate President Ken Nnamani, former Ekiti State Deputy Governor Prof. Modupe Adelabu and the Director General of Nigeria Maritime Administration and Safety Agency (NIMASA), Dr Dakuku Peterside.

    The committee will sit at the Ekiti State Government House in Ado-Ekiti and hold parleys in Ondo and Oyo states.

    The national and state legislative primaries were conducted by a five-man committee, led by Dr. Ibrahim Sule.

    Speaking yesterday ahead of the Shettima panel’s arrival, Ekiti APC Chairman Paul Omotoso urged members to allow peace to reign to enable the party to win all seats in the 2019 polls.

    According to him, the local chapter of the party had gone far in persuading some of the aggrieved aspirants to sheathe their swords.

  • Primaries: APC to sanction members in court

    THE All Progressives Congress (APC) has threatened to sanction party members who failed to utilise internal mechanism to resolve perceived grievances before heading to court.

    Such action, the party said, is capable of undermining and hurt its interest.

    APC National Publicity Secretary Mallam Lanre Issa-Onilu said in a statement in Abuja that the party was concerned about the members’ action, asking such members to withdraw such cases in courts or face disciplinary action.

    Several members of the party have taken it to court as a result of the outcome of the party primaries, which produced its candidates for the 2019 general election.

    Some of those in court with the party include serving Minister of Communication Adebayo Shittu and his Niger Delta counterpart, Usani Uguru Usani, Senator Magnus Abe, Chief of Staff to Imo State Governor Ogumba Uche Nwosu and several others, who lost out in the power play during the primaries.

    The statement said members, who have taken the party to court should understand that as a progressive party that operates on the principle of change, it is not a matter of choice to keep to the rules.

    It said such members should take the warning very seriously as failure to comply with the party’s dispute resolution procedures would be met with the disciplinary actions.

    The statement reads: “The APC National Working Committee (NWC) has frowned at the actions of some party members who have resorted to litigations as a way of addressing their perceived grievances and disputation without exhausting the party’s dispute resolution mechanism.

    “This growing trend is viewed by the party as a manifest indiscipline. The actions, it should be noted, is considered as anti-party as it goes against our party’s constitution.

    “For emphasis, according to Article 20, Subsection 10 of our party’s Constitution, offences against the party include the following: “Filing an action in a court of law against the party or any of its officers on any matters relating to the discharge of the duties of the party without first exhausting all avenues for redress provided for in this constitution.”

    “The party intends to activate constitutional provisions to penalise such members as their action is capable of undermining the party and hurt the party’s interest.

    “We hereby strongly advise such members to withdraw all court cases, while approaching the appropriate party organs with a view to resolving any outstanding disputes. In addition to this, aggrieved members are urged to take full advantage of the reconciliation committees the party has just put in place.

    “APC members should understand that as a progressive party that operates on the principle of change, it is not a matter of choice to keep to the rules.

    “We, therefore, advise such members to take this warning very seriously as failure to comply with the party’s dispute resolution procedures would be met with the stipulated disciplinary actions.”

  • APC urges aspirants to put primaries behind them

    The Ondo State chapter of the All Progressives Congress (APC) has urged aspirants into various elective positions to put the party’s primaries behind them and join hands with its leadership to ensure victory in next year’s general elections.

    The State Chairman Ade Adetimehin spoke in in Akure, the state capital, at a meeting with former aspirants to the State Assembly and House of Representatives.

    The chairman said the task ahead calls for collaboration among the party’s shareholders to ensure victory at the polls.

    He acknowledged that the aspirants had expended their scarce resources while in the race but urged them to consider whatever expenses as worthy sacrifices for the party.

    Adetimehin said: “We appreciate that you have spent money, and we know how difficult it is to raise money. However, we will continue to appeal for your understanding for peace and unity within the party.”

  • Primaries: Abayomi dumps APC

    A senatorial aspirant of the All Progressives Congress(APC) in Ondo State, Dr. Tunji Abayomi has dumped the ruling party for the Action Alliance(AA), alleging  irregularities, marginalisation and unconstitutional action by the APC leadership. The incumbent Ondo North Senator, Prof Ajayi Boroffice was cleared by the National Working Committee(NWC) to re-contest the seat for the senatorial district in 2019 while the APC leadership in the state favoured Abayomi as its candidate for the seat.

    Abayomi in a letter to Governor  Oluwarotimi Akeredolu, described as unacceptable to his people the denial of their constitutional rights which was against the  laid down constitution and rules of the party. His words ” It is never the leaders who at any rate are expected to be chosen by the people that impose candidates in democracy. This is why the constitution of APC defines candidates as “any person who has been nominated at a primary or party election to contest at a general election”.

    “In keeping with long standing determination to fight for my right and your right, I will run for Senate in Ondo North Senatorial Zone on the platform of Action Alliance,” he said.

  • Primaries: Governor offered Oshiomhole $500,000 bribe in cash

    Fresh details yesterday indicated that the National Chairman of the All Progressives Congress (APC), Comrade Adams Oshiomhole became a target after refusing $500,000 bribe cash from a governor.

    The governor wanted the APC chairman to adopt his anointed governorship candidate.

    But Oshiomhole insisted on applying the guidelines of the party for primaries.

    Also, there were indications that the APC leadership tried its best to strike a fair deal with Governor Rochas Okorocha on a 55-45 per cent basis.

    The Imo governor however opted for 100 per cent concession which was unacceptable to APC.

    Findings by our correspondent revealed that contrary to allegations, the refusal of Oshiomhole to collect bribes from godfathers and candidates accounted for the plot against him.

    It was gathered that many godfathers and governorship candidates were desperate for tickets but Oshiomhole stood his ground that he will not compromise party guidelines.

    A top source, who spoke in confidence, said: “At a stage, a governor became agitated and offered Oshiomhole about $500,000 to make sure that his candidate got a governorship ticket.

    “The bribe sum was later hauled in cash to Oshiomhole’s office by one of the emissaries of the affected governors. But the APC chairman rejected the bribery.

    “What the APC chairman did was to brief some members of the National Working Committee (NWC) on what transpired. He also intimidated some leaders of the party too. The party adhered strictly to its guidelines and the governor’s candidate lost out.

    “The governor later turned out to have joined forces in the plot to remove Oshiomhole to teach the APC chairman a lesson. It was surprising to see the governor coordinating nocturnal meetings to sack Oshiomhole.

    “The facts and witnesses are there. In the fullness of time, the name of the governor will be released. Maybe when he does not have immunity again, he will pay the price.”

    As at press time, it was learnt that President Muhammadu Buhari has ordered the Department of State Security Service (DSS) to stay away from party affairs and issues.

    Also, the President has appealed to those aggrieved among APC governors to sheathe the swords.

    A government source said: “The President has waded in the crisis of confidence between the governors and APC national chairman. We expect peace to return to the party. There might also be some reconciliation within the substitution window allowed by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC).

    “The President has however ordered DSS to avoid dabbling in party affairs. He said if there are petitions about any infraction, they should be sent to appropriate agencies. Buhari was worried that the same challenge which the DSS faced on the arrest of judges had re-occurred.”

    Meanwhile, there were indications that the APC leadership did its best to offer a fair deal to Governor Rochas Okorocha of Imo State on the party’s candidates for 2019 poll in the state.

    A reliable source said: “Okorocha is respected and loved by most of our leaders but we discovered that he cannot get all he wanted in 2019.

    “APC leaders met the governor and it was agreed that as the APC leader in the state, he should go back and do justice.

    “We offered him a fair deal. We said he should take 55% of the available seats and concede 45% of elective offices to others in the state. He accepted the deal but he returned to Imo to take 100% control of everything.

    “At this point, we have no choice than to leave his fate to APC members to decide. This was why he lost out.”

    Responding to a question, the source added: “If Okorocha was keen on his son-in-law as APC governorship candidate, there is nothing bad if he abandons his senatorial ambition.

    “What made matter worse was when APC got intelligence report that the proposed running mate to his son-in-law as APC governorship aspirant has been found to be dating another girl in the governor’s family.

    “This was why Oshiomhole came out to say he was not elected APC National Chairman to preserve any dynasty. We conceded a lot to Okorocha but he wanted wholesale party machinery in his care to do what he likes.

    “If you look at the structure in the state, it is disproportional. Okorocha is the governor, his former Personal Assistant is the Deputy Governor, his son-in-law was a former commissioner and aspiring governorship candidate; his sister is the Deputy Chief of Staff/ Commissioner; the governor has also secured a senatorial ticket and he has given tickets to many loyalists.

    “If he defects to any party, none can tolerate such indulgence because it is a mockery of democracy.”

    As at press time, it was learnt that APC may still retain the current deputy governor, Eze Madumere as running mate to its governorship candidate, Chief Hope Uzodinma.

    “We may give deputy governorship slot to Madumere again,” a top party source added.

  • 2019: Parties told to put primaries behind them

    ALL political parties contesting the 2019 general elections have been urged to find solutions to squabbles arising from their primaries.

    Hajia Kudirat Adesola Dada, the United Kingdom Director of the Turaki Vanguard Youth and Women Mobilization  Group, gave this advice on behalf of the organization in a statement in Lagos.

    The group said quarrels on primaries would not allow them to move forward to concentrate on their campaigns and other activities that would deepen Nigerian democracy.

    “In the interest of our democracy, our political parties are advised to forget all issues relating to their primaries in order to achieve a tension-free atmosphere before, during and after elections,” the group said.

    The group also commended the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) for electing former Vice-President Atiku Abubakar as its presidential candidate.

    On the former Vice-President, the group said: “This is a great man with vision, passion, knowledge, experience, exposure and patriotism to lead our country to the promised land.”

    The group called on Nigerians to support the politician who was described as “a man with structure, connections and capability to achieve success in the 2019 presidential election.”

     

  • Our decisions on primaries final, APC tells protesters

    THE All Progressives Congress (APC) yesterday explained the crises that rocked some of its state chapters as a result of the primaries to pick candidates for next year’s elections.

    Party spokesman Lanre Issa-Onilu spoke on the outcome of the governorship primaries in Ogun and Imo states, the senatorial primaries in Kaduna and Enugu states as well as the submission of the list of candidates to the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) for Zamfara State.

    Ogun State Governor Ibikunle Amosun has been up in arms over the party’s decision to recognise Prince Dapo Abiodun as the governorship candidate. He is insisting on his preferred choice, Abdulkabir Adekunle Akinlade, a member of the House of Representatives.

    In Kaduna State, Senator Shehu Sani has left the APC for the Peoples Redemption Party (PRP), following the exclusion of his name fom the list of senatorial candidates.

    In Enugu, Voice of Nigeria (VON) Director-General Osita Okechukwu has been attacking National Chairman Adams Oshiomhole after failing to get an Enugu senatorial ticket.

    The party said Amosun resorted to “self-help” to get the ticket for his preferred candidate whereas such does not exist in the party’s constitution.

    Red also: I didn’t kill my wife, Shonde tells court

    Issa-Onilu said: “The Ogun State governor gathered some aspirants, stakeholders and said clearly, ‘there won’t be primaries’ and right there he pointed at who the next governor would be; this one, you are the next senator, House of Reps etc and himself the next senatorial candidate and he dished out these positions.”

    ‘Even if they have accepted those people, it is against the procedure, especially for a governor to openly say a thing like that. It was clearly stated that the party gave two options, which is the direct and indirect primaries, and you are to have stakeholders’ meetings where majority are to decide.

    “In the case of Ogun, after they tried to handpick who will be what, they sent a letter that they had agreed on direct primary.

    “On the day they all came for screening, including the governor, suddenly they left other aspirants and returned to Abeokuta, gathered some people and sent back to the NWC that they wanted indirect primary and the other aspirants said we were all here together, that they didn’t know when this change was made.

    “Meanwhile, someone had gone to court and the court had banned the state exco from anything to do with the party. But we all saw on national TV where the governor and the State Exco, actually conducted their own primary and the process threw up the governor’s preferred candidate and it was the SSG in Ogun State, who was reading the result and it occurred to him that he had no power to call the names. So he handed over to the chairman of the party who shouldn’t have done that.

    ‘The governor has done his best trying to validate the exercise. The first thing he did was to start saying things that made it look like something wrong has happened when nothing of such has happened.

    “Secondly, he took certain monarchs, some traditional rulers from Ogun State to come and meet the President, I am surprised because someone like him should have understood the nature of the President we have, that no matter how close you are to him, he will listen to you, but he will ask for the road to be followed.

    ‘So, the problem he has is that he was looking for who to blame, and Asiwaju Bola Tinubu and Aremo Segun Osoba readily came under attack and he blamed them for that. The question to ask is, whether they were the one who gave directive to him to organise his own primaries or they were the one who instructed him not to participate in the primaries or his candidate not to participate in primaries the party organised.”

    The party said Okechukwu failed to secure the senatorial ticket from Enugu State and decided to accuse the nattional chairman of nepotism.

    “Okechukwu is a highly respected member of the party and a very senior member. But you can also understand that it is not about him and the party, but about him picking the senatorial ticket of his constituency and that is about ambition. When that does not happen, you don’t expect him not to cry; he has the right to ventilate his anger and it is for the party to also listen to him.

    “He may have gone overboard in making all sort of ill-accusations. But you also have to understand his present situation. He lost out. If that same process had favoured him, he will be in his office, in an aircondition atmosphere, drinking coffee and laughing at whoever is complaining. But it didn’t work for him, so you dont expect him not to complain and there must be someone to blame in such a situation. So, he has picked on the chairman unfortunately.”

    On Kaduna Central Senate seat, the party explained that much as it tried to   protect “our legislators, the other people could not understand and accept that”. The initial effort of the party did not get the blessing of other people in that area who are also entitled to bid for positions. The primaries were eventually conducted, Senator Shehu Sani opted out, he relied on the earlier decision.

    “At the end of the day, no matter what plan you have, even though you are acting on expedience, rule of law, democracy will prevail. It was democracy that prevailed in Kaduna.”

    For Imo State the APC said it would rely on the outcome of the cases in court at the time of submission of the list of governorship candidates on November 2. “The position of the party is that whatever court judgment, good or bad, we must comply with it. We will only decide who will be APC’s governorship candidate for Imo State by November 2nd.”

    The party said its Legal Department was studying the Supreme Court ruling on Rivers State to enable it take its decision.

    On Zamfara State, the APC said it had submitted names of its National Assembly candidates adding that it was left for INEC to accept or reject them, but added that “INEC cannot disqualify candidates. We all know that.”

  • ‘Supreme Court didn’t set aside Rivers APC’s congresses, primaries’

    The Publicity Secretary of Rivers State All Progressives Congress (APC), Chris Finebone, said the Supreme Court did not set aside the party’s ward, local government and state congresses and  the primaries.

    He said the appeal filed at the apex court by Ibrahim Umar and 22 other supporters of Senator Magnus Abe (Rivers Southeast) – the ruling was given yesterday – three issues were canvassed, one of which was that the Appeal Court did not act correctly by granting a stay of execution on the interlocutory orders of the Rivers High Court, with the apex court agreeing with them.

    Finebone, yesterday in Port Harcourt, explained that the Supreme Court did not make pronouncements on the other issues, since the Rivers High Court, presided over by Justice Chinwendu Nwogu, had already given final judgment on them, an action he insisted made the present development a mere academic exercise.

    He stressed that the Supreme Court only granted the appeal in parts and did not make any consequential order, which he said could only be a subject matter at the Appeal Court, when the appeal hearing of the Rivers high court judgment would begin.

    Finebone said: “The Supreme Court today (yesterday) allowed the appellant’s appeal, which was against the stay of order of injunction of May 11, 2018. The apex court said the said order should not have been stayed. The Supreme Court made no orders, except to set aside the Court of Appeal’a order, which clears the way for hearing of the main appeal at Court of Appeal, Port Harcourt, against the judgment of the Rivers High Court. Their prayer that Supreme Court should hear the pending appeal at Court of Appeal was rejected. The appeal is to be heard and determined by the Court of Appeal, Port Harcourt.

    “It is important for APC faithful to ignore the raging propaganda by detractors that the Supreme Court set aside congresses and primaries of the party in Rivers State. That is a lie from the pit of hell.

    “As things stand, all pending appeals at the Appeal Court are proceeding apace. Appeal and stay of the final judgment of the Rivers High Court, Port Harcourt, given on the October 10, 2018, are being perfected and hearing will commence thereafter.”

    Rivers APC Chairman Ojukaye Flag-Amachree said: “What the Supreme Court did today (yesterday) was to set aside the stay of execution of the Court of Appeal, Port Harcourt on an order given by Justice Chinwendu Nwogu, which has been overtaken by his judgment. Because after the stay of execution, Justice Nwogu has given his judgement.

    “No court has set aside the order of perpetual injunction granted by Abuja High Court 14, presided over by Justice A. O. Musa, on September 4, 2018, in which it restrained the APC and its National Chairman, Comrade Adams Oshiomhole (1st and 2nd defendants), from tampering with the mandates of the elected officials/delegates elected at the 1st defendant’s ward, local government and state congresses in Rivers State on May 19, 20 and 21, 2018, either by nullifying, removing or in any way refusing to give effect to the outcome of the said congresses or by purporting to conduct another congress in respect of Rivers State.”

  • Party primaries: matters arising

    Primaries by political parties for the forthcoming national elections have come and gone. But they left in their wake sour issues with wide repercussions for the growth and development of virile democratic culture.

    Even as the time frame for the conclusion of the primaries has since elapsed, the fallouts are yet to be conclusively resolved in some states. Reports from across the country beginning with the congresses of the parties during which they elected officers at the ward, local government, state and national levels spoke of impositions that denied ordinary members the right to partake in that basic civic duty.

    If reports of imposition at the level of the earlier congresses were minimal, that of the primaries was another thing all together. For parties using the indirect primary approach, card carrying members at the ward levels were expected to elect ad hoc delegates who will subsequently elect their candidates for the state houses of assembly, House of Representatives and governorship. But ad hoc delegates elected at the local government levels were to participate together with their statutory counterparts in the election of their presidential candidates at the parties’ conventions. But those using the direct approach required all card carrying members to vote at the primaries.

    The guiding principle is to actively involve the people who are the real owners of the parties in the running of their (parties) affairs and decisions as to the choice of those to represent them. Ordinarily referred to as internal democracy, it is a cardinal principle that stands out and gives value to democracy against other forms of governance framework.

    It also bears positive correlation with the social contract theory account of the evolution of modern democratic states. This theory conceives ultimate sovereignty as the prerogative of the people. It is this cardinal principle that is at test each time elections come up either in the form of congresses for the election of party officers at the various levels, primaries and conventions and general elections.

    Congresses, primaries and conventions therefore serve as the basic tests to gauge the commitment by political parties to the rights of their members to elect their leaders in a free, fair and transparent manner. It is also a measure of the level of respect political parties have for the sovereignty of the people as freely expressed at the ballot box.

    Whatever tendencies and dispositions parties exude at these basic levels of testing their capacity to allow the collective will of the people free reign are extrapolated as veritable signposts of what to expect at general elections. It can therefore be safely said that the extent to which political parties are committed to internal democracy mirrors their dispositions to free, fair and credible electoral contests.

    It is against this background that one is alarmed at the sordid outcome of the just concluded primaries of our leading political parties. The tone of events appeared to have been set with the controversy that embroiled the mode of primaries to be adopted by the parties. At the end of the bickering, the All Progressives Congress APC settled for both the direct and the indirect variants depending on the circumstance of each state. But the Peoples Democratic Party PDP and some others settle for the indirect option.

    Both options have things going for them. Their capacities to approximate the collective will of party members are not in doubt provided the rules of free and fair contest are neither abridged nor compromised. Ironically, the outcome of those primaries did not bear this optimism out. In many states across the country, imposition of candidates and impunity reigned supreme as party members were denied the right to elect their preferred candidates.

    Though the two leading parties: the APC and PDP are culpable in this, the malfeasance is more prevalent within the APC probably because it is the government in power. But some other smaller political parties especially those controlling one or two states are also in this mess. The case of the All Progressives Grand Alliance APGA in Imo State stands out distinctly. It has generated allegations of imposition among contestants for the governorship primaries threatening to tear the party apart.

    In Lagos, PDP members in the Alimosho local government area have protested alleged imposition of House of Representatives and state house of assembly candidates. They alleged that the state executive handpicked the candidates without holding any primary in the local government area.

    And in Zamfara, friction, bickering and threats of violence prevented the APC from holding the primaries. The national leadership of the party is locked in bickering with INEC which has written the party foreclosing its right to field candidates for any election in the state except the presidential poll. INEC letter stemmed from the inability of the party to conduct primaries in the state within the stipulated timeframe in keeping with provisions of the Electoral Act.

    But the APC citing threats of violence and friction among groups within the party claimed it later adopted the consensus option to generate a list of candidates it intends to forward to the electoral body. We are not as much concerned with the issues being traded by both parties as the fact of the APC’s admission that threats of violence, disagreement and friction debarred the primaries from holding.

    Zamfara is not alone in this. There were reports of three deaths in Ebonyi State when contending groups clashed at the primaries. These are in addition to the many unreported cases of violence and threats of it as the political parties filed out for their primaries. What all these go to underscore and very succinctly too is the fact that the primaries failed the true test of internal democracy in many parts of the country.

    And this is very unfortunate. If primaries which are internal affairs of the parties are that rancorous and lethal, one shudders at the likely turn of events at the general elections. Those who secured their candidacy by bending the rules will go at any length during general elections to win at all costs. Such negative dispositions will only heat up the political landscape and invariably produce outcomes that threaten the democratic foundation of the country.

    It is a sad commentary that political parties failed to allow free and fair electoral contest to hold sway at their primaries. The enormity of imposition and subversion of rules of the game, so much disappointed the wife of the president, Aisha Buhari that she publicly deprecated the processes employed during the primaries by the APC.

    Hear her: “it is very disheartening to note that some aspirants used their hard earned money to purchase nomination forms; got screened, cleared and campaigned vigorously, yet found their names omitted on election day. Many others contested and yet had their results delayed fully knowing that automatic tickets have been given to other people”.

    Mrs Buhari’s predicament mirrors vividly some of the imperfections of the primaries conducted by the parties. Imposition resulting in crises may have been more noticeable within the APC for very obvious reasons but it is not limited to that party. The PDP has been beating its chest celebrating its organizational prowess at its convention in Port Harcourt. Yes, the organization met the criteria for free and fair conduct. But that is not all there was to it.

    During the conduct of its primaries to elect ad hoc delegates, allegations of imposition and substitution of names with preferred persons at the national headquarters of the party were also freely traded.  That was in addition to the fact that delegates’ elections were not even held in many areas even as lists were generated by those very close to the party leadership. All these cast some slur on the final outcome of the convention for its abridgment of internal democracy.

    If democracy must survive in this country, the primacy of internal democracy in the conduct of party affairs must be upheld. And if these dysfunctional attitudinal dispositions are allowed to hold sway, they will inexorably lead to outcomes of catastrophic effect during general elections. That is the foreboding danger.

  • Ex-Ondo Speaker, APC aspirants petition NWC over primaries

    A coalition of Aggrieved All Progressives Congress(APC) Aspirants in Ondo on Thursday met in Akure,the state capital on the latest political development in the state.

    They discussed on how they were ‘unjustly’ disenfranchised from participating in the National/State Assemblies primaries purportedly conducted last Friday.

    A communique issued after the meeting jointly signed by its chairman, who is a former Speaker of the house, Kenneth Olawale and group’s Secretary,Kabiru Hassan urged their supporters to remain calm,stressing that efforts were being made within the ambit of the law to get justice on the matter.

    The group noted that the decision of the National Working Committee(NWC) of the party to reject the list of candidates allegedly concocted by the leadership of the party in the state was applauded by over 60 percent of the Aspirants in attendance at the meeting.

    Also, some members of the APC loyal to a Senatorial Aspirant, Prince Adeyemi Foluso said they were disappointed over the outcome of the primaries.

    At a rally in Ikare-Akoko, headquarters of Akoko Northeast, the spokesman of Adeyemi Foluso Campaign Organisation, Told Olowo-Okere said they would influence their principal to pull-out of the ruling party because of its shortcomings on the shadow election.

    According to him, they would seek other platform with genuine internal democracy to realise their goals.

    But,Foluso urged his supporters to remain calm, stressing his decision on the issue would come after the meeting with the national leadership of the APC.