Tag: probe

  • Kukah’s probe homily

    No discerning practitioner or observer of socio-political activities in Nigeria will, consciously, discountenance the unfettered contributions of Bishop Matthew Hassan Kukah, who is presently the Catholic Bishop of Sokoto Diocese. When it was not fashionable to be seen to counter the draconian policies and programmes of the then dreaded General Sani Abacha junta, Bishop Kukah and his fellow civil society activists were on the rampage waging a war of nerves against the maximum leader and his apologists.

    Bishop Kukah’s belief in and commitment to the Nigerian Project is better understood in the context of his being a highly-visible Catholic cleric who is not encumbered by some people’s notion that he should be seen but not heard. It is on record that this commitment to foster peace and harmony among Nigeria’s diverse ethnic or tribal and religious configuration, drove his resolve to convene the National Peace Committee as a vehicle to ensure peaceful and violence-free elections before, during and after the last electioneering exercise.

    When this body of eminent Nigerians met President Muhammadu Buhari recently, it did not do so at the behest of any person either in or out of government, supposedly on account of the ongoing probes or rumours of probes. Unfortunately, that visit has suddenly become controversial. What may have prompted the rash of ill comments from some quarters about the mission and agenda of the Committee, is the reported opinion canvassed by Bishop Kukah that the current anti-graft crusade should be conducted within a backdrop of the Constitution and the Rule of Law and not on a monarchical set up that ensures that the President’s word is inviolate. Bishop Kukah opined that while the war against corruption and economic pillaging is in full steam, care should be taken to ensure that due process is not set aside in the bid to play to the gallery and leave the duties of state to go fallow.

    It is pertinent to mention that the preponderance of informed opinions on the on-going wide probes in the country is that the formation of the Presidential Anti-Graft Advisory Committee headed by Professor Itse Sagay, may be both extra-judicial and unconstitutional. The argument is that it goes against the grain of the need to investigate and prosecute proven cases of corruption by constitutionally-recognised bodies which should be strengthened and fundamentally-restructured to confront the ogre of corruption and corruptive activities in the country.

    Therefore, Bishop Kukah’s views about the ongoing cacophony of innuendoes and insinuations of high-falutin corruption and graft, is that it may actually distract the President’s focus from doing what he was elected to do in the first instance. He said, inter alia: “Everybody knows that things are not the way they ought to be. We are just trying to encourage people that let’s get on with this business of fixing this country. Let’s get to the business of realising the change that we dreamt of. And also, most importantly, let’s get down with the business of co-operating with God so that Nigeria can move forward…I think that is what ordinary Nigerians are expecting. This is what they voted for. The truth of the matter is that time is not on our side. Our responsibility is to encourage politicians to do what they were elected to do.”

    This and other pan-Nigerian views expressed by Bishop Kukah, are not patronising or tongue-in-cheek but a timely homily delivered in the national interest and not one constructed in the warped imagination of his (and by extension, the National Peace Committee) traducers, who are finding “solution” to corruption and graft through witch-hunting, media-prosecution and trial by ordeal. After all, Bishop Kukah has an inalienable right to hold personal views or opinion on any subject as far as it does not impinge on those of other people. That he is a priest does not detract from the primary fact that he is also a concerned Nigerian committed to the welfare of its citizens.

    Some people have maintained that the main focus and thrust of the much-hyped probes and rumours of probes are directed against the former administration of Dr Goodluck Jonathan. This is the more reason why the President will do well to diffuse the gathering storm of the rehearsed persecutions and witch-hunts and face actual governance. He should also offset his campaign promises without necessarily, wittingly or unwittingly, fuelling any distractions and its attendant media razzmatazz as we are now witnessing. The kernel of Bishop Kukah’s homily is that real focus and attention should be placed on pressing national issues that need urgent and holistic solutions. And there are several issues begging for attention.

    ‘We must avoid the vilification and demonisation of those who, out of their patriotic zeal, are contributing to the pool of ideas that will move the country up the ladder of progress.’

    Quite understandably, the president is doing his outmost best to stamp out terrorism in the Northeast of the country. The recent appointment of new Service Chiefs and National Security Adviser have, indeed, upped the ante in the war against the Boko Haram terrorists who have virtually paralysed the socio-economic well-being of that part of the country. But the president needs to do more to convince Nigerians that they did not make a wrong choice on March 28, 2015 when they trooped out to cast their votes for him at the presidential election.

    One particular area that readily comes to mind is the area of infrastructures including roads, schools, hospitals and all that. For instance, nothing seems to be happening anymore on the Lagos-Ibadan Expressway which reconstruction work has suddenly stopped. Besides, most of our hospitals have remained, if I may borrow from the late General Sani Abacha’s coup day broadcast on December 31, 1983, “mere consulting clinics”. Nowadays, people go to hospitals, especially government hospitals, not for succour or any healing, but simply to go and die. As for schools, the whole thing has gone from bad to worse as pupils and students now study under terribly unbearable conditions fit only for animals. I can go on and on.

    While Nigeria is not running or operating a Saudi Arabia-type of “democracy” where the King is virtually infallible and a “political island”, President Buhari and his party, the APC, as well as his advisers, should imbibe the virtue of assimilating or adapting the positive contributions that will provide a reservoir or pool of alternatives but useful advice necessary in driving his nascent administration to success.

    Therefore, the current virulent and bileful riposte by the president’s men smacks of a deliberate leakage of what transpired between the President and the National Peace Committee at the recent meeting held at the Villa. This is what has triggered the laughable and ill-conceived demonstrations to Aso Rock Villa and other public places. The spontaneity of the reactions to the views expressed by Bishop Kukah by some interested members of the Nigerian public, appeared programmed and sponsored to convey a populist rejection of those pan-Nigeria opinions and suggestions raised by the erudite cleric, as they were not in sync with those held by some interested parties who are in favour of ‘mob justice’.

    It is imperative that Nigerians should be spared a resurgence of the orgy of “solidarity marches” that defined and characterised the Abacha despotic years which some concerned Nigerians believed was not indicative of the junta’s popularity rating. And if these “million-man marches” are being sponsored with tax payers’ money, then corruption, by other means, is at play.

    The truth is that all patriotic Nigerians should endeavour to contribute viable ideas that will move the country towards the realisation of corruption-free governance, sustainable development and the equitable distribution of the dividends of democracy. We must avoid the vilification and demonisation of those who, out of their patriotic zeal, are contributing to the pool of ideas that will move the country up the ladder of progress.

  • Probe: Amaechi’s aide, council chair snub Omereji panel

    The Justice George Omereji-led Judicial Commission of Enquiry has ordered former Rivers State Commissioner of Agriculture, Emmanuel Chinda, to appear before him on Friday to explain how the N4 billion agricultural loan acquired by the Chibuike Amaechi administration for farmers was diverted or disbursed.

    The panel said the ex-commissioner would be arrested if he failed to appear before it.

    Also summoned are: former local government chairmen and ex-commissioners through who the funds were allegedly disbursed.

    Governor Nyesom Wike inaugurated the panel on June 19 to investigate the Amaechi administration for allegedly selling the state’s assets and other related matters.

    The panel began sitting on Monday, following the failure of two court cases filed to stop the members from sitting.

    The commission, on its first day, began hearing on how N2 billion of the N4 billion Agriculture Credit Guarantee Scheme’s fund was disbursed.

    The panel’s agenda for the day reads: “The disbursement or use by the Rivers State Ministry of Agriculture of N2 billion Agriculture Credit Guarantee Scheme Funds.”

    Permanent secretaries in the ministries of Agriculture and Commerce and Industry, Mrs. Atonye Tari-Okoye and Mrs. Cordelia Maurice Peterside, as well as a director in the Ministry of Agriculture, who served as chairman of Agriculture Loan Disbursement Committee, Chijioke Grant Amadi, testified before the panel on Monday.

    Mrs Tari-Okoye denied any involvement in the disbursement.

    She explained that although she was the permanent secretary in the ministry, she was not a member of the committee and could only confirm that N1 billion of the N4 billion loan acquired from the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) was set aside for the building and stocking of fish farms in three local government areas of Opobo, Ubima in Ikwerre and Andoni.

    The two of the three farms, it was learnt, have been completed and stocked except that of Opobo.

    Mrs Tari-Okoye said part of the remaining N3 billion was used to pay Oniga Investments, the company that managed the farms while some money was spent on bank charges.

    According to her, the money left for disbursement to farmers was below N3 billion.

    In their separate evidence, Peterside and Amadi said the N2 billion was disbursed to farmers as grants through 380 registered Mother Farmer Cooperative Societies, including former local government chairmen and ex-commissioners.

    Mrs Maurice Peterside said the registration certificates of the 38 mother corporative societies, which received the funds, could not be traced in the ministry.

    The panel, on Monday, announced that Chinda and the former local government chairmen and state commissioners indicted in the evidence had been invited to appear before the commission to give their evidence.

    They were expected to appear yesterday. But at the yesterday’s sitting none of the respondents was present, they shunned the panel.

    Chinda filed a notice of summons to the commission and its members, alleging infringement on his fundamental right to fair hearing.

     

     

     

     

  • Court okays probe of Amaechi’s govt

    A Rivers State High Court, sitting in Port Harcourt, yesterday dismissed the suit filed by former Governor Rotimi Amaechi challenging the setting up of a Judicial Commission of Enquiry to probe his administration.

    Governor Nyesom Wike constituted the Justice George Omereji-led commission to probe the alleged sale of the state’s assets by the Amaechi administration.

    Justice Simeon Amadi, who delivered the verdict yesterday, said the commission of enquiry was not meant to probe Amaechi’s personal activities but to examine the actions of the former administration as they affected the residents.

    Wike, according to the judge, was empowered to establish the judicial commission of enquiry to probe the actions of the former government.

    Justice Amadi said no law prevented a state government from finding out how its resources were utilised.

    On Amaechi’s position that the 30 days for the sitting of the commission would deny him fair hearing, Justice Amadi said the period for the commission’s sitting did not breach Amaechi’s right to fair hearing.

    The judge noted that since the former governor had not filed a memorandum before the commission and had not appeared before it, he could not complain of not getting a fair hearing.

    He said the 30 days for the commission of enquiry was not sacrosanct, adding that the period could be extended.

    Attorney-General and Commissioner for Justice, Emmanuel Aguma, noted that with the court ruling, the commission of enquiry could begin its sitting.

    He promised that it would be fair to all the parties.

    Amaechi said last night he would appeal the court’s verdict.

    Through his lawyer, Winifred Enyinnaya, the former governor said he would appeal the planned probe.

     

     

  • Buhari advised to probe Centenary City project

    President Muhammadu Buhari has been advised to probe the multi-billion dollar Centenary City project.

    The Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) National Vice- Chairman, (Southsouth), Dr. Cairo Ojougboh, had accused the former Secretary to the Government of the Federation (SGF), Senator Anyim Pius Anyim, of unilaterally acquiring the Centenary City project with the Nnamdi Azikiwe International Airport Road, Abuja, project.

    The National Coordinator of the Coalition of Northern Activist Groups, led by the Northern Patriotic Front (NPF), Comrade Ali Abacha, at a news conference in Abuja, faulted the comments credited to Dr. Ojougboh.

    He said: “The allegation is not only misleading, but is aimed at negating the good intentions of the project. More so, Dr. Ojuigboh’s attempt at disparaging the character and personality of the ex-SGF is unacceptable. We declare such utterances emanating from  Ojuigboh as baseless, directionless and a desperate man’s reckless depicting of acrimony.

    “The Federal Government should look into the project, but should not kill it.”

    The statement, which was read by NPF’s Secretary, Alhaji Abdulrazaq Isa, said: “Dr. Ojuignoh has unwittingly allowed his personal crises into the public domain to expose himself as a confused man, who does not know the next point from his current position.

    “As against his claims of vindictive removal from his position as the former chairman of the Board of the Nigeria Export Processing Authority (NEPZA), by the former SGF, Dr. Ojougboh was relieved of his position on account of gross inefficiency. What has he done as the national vice chairman of the party to forestall this dangerous trend and hold out on his duties and responsibilities as the party’s reference point in that zone? Rather, he has created the picture of a man busy chasing rats while his house is on fire.”

  • NGO urges EFCC to probe management of defunct Afribank

    NGO urges EFCC to probe management of defunct Afribank

    The Economic Financial Crime Commission (EFCC) has been asked to reopen the case involving the management of the defunct Afribank, it was learnt.

    The Nigerian Transparency Network (NTN), a non-governmental organisation (NGO), petitioned the EFCC on the issue with the aim of ensuring justice for the affected shareholders of the bank.

    According to the group which is calling for the prosecution of the top management of the failed bank, EFCC should revisit the case in line with the present administration’s zero tolerance for corru[tion.

    The group in a press statement signed by its Executive Director, Aliyu Ibrahim, stated that the only way the anti-graft body could assist the shareholders who are already counting their losses is to ensure that those responsible for the collapse of the bank are brought to book in line with the present administration anti- corruption stand.

    The statement reads in part: “We wish to address you gentlemen of the press today as a responsible and responsive civil society organization on behalf of the helpless and seemingly hopeless shareholders of the defunct Afribank Plc whose investment in the shares of the bank has been hanging since the collapse of the bank in 2009 occassioned by alleged financial misappropriation and fraud by the erstwhile executive directors of the said bank.

    “Gentlemen of the press you would recall that sometime in 2009 the economic and financial crimes commission began the prosecution of members of the management staff of the bank over alleged complicity in the issue of financial dealings that led to the collapse of the bank.

    “We also recalled that we have written a letter of petition to the current chairman of EFCC dated 31st of July, 2015 and a copy of it published in an advertorial in the Nigerian Tribune of Monday 3rd August, 2015 requesting for the Chairman of the commission to revisit the matter with a view to properly investigate the matter and begin a fresh prosecution in the general interest of justice and particular interest of the shareholders who are already counting their losses.

    “We therefore use this medium to call on the leadership of EFCC to immediately look into the matter.

    “It is also worthy of note to state that the current administration  under the astute leadership of President Muhammodu Buhari has promised a zero tolerance to corruption, a feat we hope the EFCC will uphold in order to support the objectives of government as it relates to corruption.”

  • Power sector needs EFCC, not Senate probe

    Senate President, Dr, Bukola Saraki, is troubled. This has nothing to do with his ongoing crisis of legitimacy as Senate President. For now, the battle against his political party that has accused him of playing Brutus has been shifted to another day. His priority today is promoting solidarity with Nigerians that have been in darkness for 16 years. Bukola Saraki, an inheritor of Kwara fiefdom who often treats all as subjects, told Nigerians last week that he was troubled that they have not derived joy from both ‘the power Reform Act and the unbundling of the Power Holding Company of Nigeria.’

    Senator Godswill Akpabio, probably as part of the horse-trading that produced him Senate Minority Leader against Senate convention, was the first to echo the Senate President’s sentiments. He was followed by Senator Danjuma Goje who expressed his empathy for Nigerians because of ‘the untold suffering that lack of power supply had caused’ them. As for Senator Ndume, his righteous indignation stemmed not just from the fact that he spends  N10,000  daily to power his generator, but more from the failure of ‘government to show anything for the huge amount of money sunk into the power sector in the last 16 years.

    United by their passion for Nigeria, law makers that have for two months engaged in  competition over ‘materials and ideas’ which only ended with the sharing of about N13b for doing absolutely nothing, resolved to probe the power sector from Obasanjo to Jonathan. They have accordingly set up the Senator Abubakar Kyari‘s Ad Hoc Committee to ‘investigate the activities of the Discos and what is preventing Nigerians from benefitting from the unbundling of the PHCN’.

    However, for the exercise not to be seen as diversionary, many are saying the Senate should first solve its leadership crisis of legitimacy following the establishment by the police that the Senate rules used for the election of the Senate leadership were forged. But beyond this, many also believe Nigerians don’t really need a probe to identify those behind their continued darkness. All that is needed, in their view, since our leaders believe Nigerians suffer from collective amnesia, is a recall to memory.

    In 2008, Obasanjo in a long letter warned the Dimeji Bankole-led Lower House that probing his handling of the power sector will be noting but ‘a theatrical or circus show (which) will provide fun and maybe hurt some people’. He then went on to give an account of his stewardship to the Elumelu House Committee. He inherited in 1999 seven power stations in different states of disrepair, generating 1500MW; he added six with the seventh at finishing stage by 2007; introduced the pre-paid meter system and moved revenue generation from about N2b per month in year 2000 to about N7b per month in 2007 with$6.5b as capital expenditure and running costs between 1999 to 2007 including outstanding letters of credit as against the Dimeji Bankole’s $16b and Yar Adua’s $10b bandied figures. He capped all up with the inauguration of the Nigeria Integrated Power Project (NIPP), hoping ‘his successors would be driven with the same zeal and move the planned target up to 20,000 MW by 2015’.According to him, to kick-start, besides the Chinese loan facility, the National Council of State and the National Assembly also approved an initial $2.5b for NIPP from the “Excess Crude Oil Account” (ECOA) in August 2005.

    The late Dr. Agagu, his minister for power,  also revealed that ‘between June 2000 and December 2002, ‘our electricity generation capacity increased from 1425 to 4300 megawatts’; that the establishment of four power projects were completed within 24 months from contractors’ mobilisation, making them the fastest of deliveries in the history of Nigeria. ‘For all the four plants, a concessionary funding programme was negotiated with the Chinese Exim Bank through which the Nigerian government paid only 35 per cent of their cost for the plants to be delivered. The balance of 65 per cent, he explained, was to be paid over a seven-year period at six per cent interest rate and two years moratorium’. But Godwin Elumelu, as House of Representative chairman on power representing cash strapped lawmakers who claimed to have sold landed properties to fight the 2007 election, insisted there was indeed evidence of corruption in the process of awarding the contracts. On that account they delayed the Obasanjo scheme for two years.

    But all that was needed to prove our lawmakers were men with feet of clay was an opportunity to spend N7b of excess REA fund within two weeks to prevent the money from returning to government coffers. To beat the deadline,  Elumelu and his colleagues according to EFCC, ignored ‘due process’, nominated nine contractors by proxy, authorised the MD of REA to award them the contracts, and prevailed on the Permanent Secretary of the ministry who was also the acting minister to grant approval for the contracts and the payment of 15 per cent of the fee. The balance of 85 per cent was equally withdrawn from the REA account and lodged in the banks where those contractors had their accounts. On June 14 2010, EFCC further accused Godwin Elumelu, and Senator Nicholas Ugbane, his counterpart as Senate Committee Chairman on Power, of misappropriating over N10b public funds. EFCC therefore concluded that theexercise ”was used as conduit pipes with which funds of the Rural Electrification Agency were siphoned”.  EFCC added other offences – ‘misappropriation of N500million to buy houses; diversion of REA’s funds; flouting of government’s rules on award of contracts and award of fictitious and unnecessary contracts without following due process.’ But Justice M.G Umar of Abuja High Court on March 24, 2012, absolved them along with their fronts, claiming ‘he was unable to find a prima facie case or complaint disclosed in the proof of evidence against the respondent’. EFCC never appealed.

    Jonathan, after a two-year delay, went back to Obasanjo’s programme. His Roadmap for Power Sector Reform was a continuation of Obasanjo’s 2005 Electric Power Sector Reform Act (EPSR Act), which called for ‘unbundling the national power utility company into a series of 18 successor companies: six generation companies and 11 distribution companies. But the well-known forces behind our darkness once again overwhelmed a less self-assertive Jonathan. For instance, most of the 60 licensed Independent Power Producers (IPPs) were allegedly owned by some PDP leaders or their sympathisers. And as if to confirm this, Jerry Gana, a PDP leading light doubling as (IPPAN) chairman,  led the body to meet government over the demand of IPPS for waivers on ‘importation of gas-related machinery and equipment.’ The Jonathan government followed with a promise of more than half a billion bailout.

    As the saying goes, ‘the pests that feed on leaf live on leaves’. The Senate needs not waste our resources to know that those who have continued to feed on the blood and sweat of Nigerian tax payers are those prolonging our darkness. Dagogo Jack, the chairman of Jonathan presidential task force on power now says “ since government  has no control over private firms, the best government can do is to ensure they ‘sustain the current 4500MW level, if they cannot increase it.” With power generation sometimes falling below 2000MW and   consumers debited for energy never supplied, government says it is helpless. Prof Bath Nnaji who as minister for power claimed that ‘apart from transmission, the  (power)sector, ”with regard to generation,  was moving ahead by ‘leaps and bounds’, now as an investor, probably smiles to the bank following the commissioning of his transmission firm in Aba by then President Jonathan.  The lot of consumers remains the same. His successor, Prof. Nebo, who told us that ”the situation where only 25 per cent of Nigerians have access to electricity is a nightmare caused by human beings used by evil forces” has failed to identify the parasites that have continued to prolong our darkness. Of course, as for the well-known PDP stalwarts with links to the power sector who donated billions towards ex-president Jonathan’s failed reelection bid, what is needed is not Senate probe but EFCC inquisition.

  • ‘Buhari’s resolve to probe Jonathan’s administration in order’

    ‘Buhari’s resolve to probe Jonathan’s administration in order’

    Abayomi Sheba is a former member of the House of Representatives. He is the Commissioner representing Ondo State on the board of the Federal Character Commission. In this interview with reporters, he speaks on the appointments by President Muhammadu Buhari and the decision to probe the administration of his predecessor, Dr. Goodluck Jonathan. Deputy Political Editor RAYMOND MORDI was there.

    As a member of the Federal Character Commission, what is your reaction to appointments made so far by President Muhammadu Buhari?

    So far, the President has acted well as an experienced administrator by going for the best hands. The appointments of Service Chiefs were based purely on merit. It was devoid of political considerations and ethnic or primordial cleavages. He has not acted contrary to the laws of the land because, less than five per cent of the available appointments have been filled. Even as it is, there is no geo-political zone that is not represented. By the time all the appointments are made, I believe every state will be represented.

    Has he breached any provision of the law on appointments?

    Not yet because appointments into all the available vacancies in the present administration have not been concluded. Section 14(3) of the 1999 Constitution (as amended) states that “The composition of the Government of the Federation or any of its agencies and the conduct of its affairs shall be carried out in such a manner as to reflect the federal character of Nigeria and the need to promote national unity, and also to command national loyalty, thereby ensuring that there shall be no predominance of persons from a few States or from a few ethnic or other sectional groups in that Government or in any of its agencies.” This section was amplified by the provisions in Part 1 (C) of the Third Schedule of the 1999 Constitution (as amended) and made justiceable by the Federal Character Commission (Establishment, etc.) Act Cap F7 LFN 2004. Key appointments such as that of the the Secretary to the Government of the Federation (SGF), the Chief of Staff, Ministers, Executive Directors and Board members are yet to be appointed. Consequently it will preposterous to draw any conclusion now.

    How can the fear of the people be allayed that the President has not shown bias in his appointments?

    The fears of our people can only be allayed by the President through strict adherence to the letters of the 1999 Constitution (as amended) and all the extant rules and laws that governs appointment to public office in Nigeria. As I said earlier, the President is not a novice, he knows the law and I am sure he will apply it as it is and not as it ought to be.

    How can the crisis rocking the National Assembly be amicably resolved?

    My appeal to the principal actors and all the dramatis personae in the National Assembly imbroglio is for them to toe the path of constitutionality and respect the supremacy of the Political Parties that sponsored them. There is no provision yet in our constitution for independent candidacy. Hence the parties must be respected as it’s the norm in advanced democracy. Take for instance in South Africa, Thabo Mbeki was asked to step down as President by his party, the ANC, and he complied. Parties should be strengthened so that they can maintain discipline.

    The time to work hard is now. They must forget all their bickering and move on with the job they are elected to do. To whom much is given, much is expected. There is so much work to be done. We need laws to tackle corruption, insecurity, kidnapping, armed robbery, banditry, etc. The electorates are tired of the infighting in the House. They should get back to the business they are elected to do and that is legislating for good governance and the well being of Nigeria.

    What is your reaction to the constituting the federal cabinet delay more than two months after assuming office?

    The President has not breached any law in this regard. I am sure he is taking his time to have a full grasp of what is on ground before assigning roles to people. When President Obama was first elected, it took him almost seven months before appointing his cabinet. Ditto the late President Umaru Yar Adua in 2007 appointed his ministers almost three months after inauguration. It is better to understand fully what’s on ground before constituting the cabinet, than coming in with wrong people. In any case, the President has promised to do this in September. So, let’s wait for him. Nigeria this time around deserves the best.

    The President has declared his intention to probe the administration of Dr. Goodluck Jonathan. What is your view on this?

    If we must reckon with what we are reading about the last administration on the social media, I think the era must be probed. How would ministers be stealing over one million barrels of crude oil per day? If it’s true, it’s scandalous and cruel. The probe should however be targeted at recovery of our stolen wealth and patrimony. Culprits should be punished according to the laws of the land to serve as deterrent to others.

    Are you in favour of slashing salaries and allowances of lawmakers, which have been described as outrageous?

    On salaries of National Assembly members, sincerely speaking nothing is wrong or outrageous with the salaries as proposed by the Revenue Mobilisation and Fiscal Allocation Commission (RMFAC). The problem is the bogus allowances injected into the budget when preparing the budget. This must be discouraged by this administration. Nigeria must rise again, because change has come.

    What is the best way for President Buhari to checkmate corruption?

    We must be able to identify the loopholes and leakages in the system and plug them. While I urge the President to reward hardwork, industry and good behavior, sanctions must be meted out for any act of impunity and any anti-social acts. We must also strengthen all the anti corruption agencies in the land, and review outdated anti-corruption laws.

    The recent bail-out to states by the Federal Government has been attracting mixed reactions. What is your view on it?

    It’s a right step in the right direction. I give kudos to Mr. President. Even Greece was given a lifeline recently by the European Union (EU). So, nothing is wrong with that. But, it’s important that states must make judicious use of the money and it must not be diverted. It must be used for the purpose for which it was granted. States must also diversify their Internally Generated Revenue (IGR) mechanism, so that they will not always go cap in hand to the federal government.

  • 2015 poll: RECs under probe, says INEC chairman

    2015 poll: RECs under probe, says INEC chairman

    •INEC begins audit of PVCs
    •10m voter cards yet to be collected
    •400,000 PVCs not produced yet by contractors

    The Acting Chairman of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), Mrs. Amina Zakari, has admitted that some Resident Electoral Commissioners are under investigation, but the actual number was still unknown to the electoral body.

    She said the commission is only watching and waiting for the outcome of the ongoing investigations by security agencies.

    She, however, said the agency will give those affected the benefit of doubt in line with the legal framework that they are innocent until proven guilty.

    She also said the commission will soon begin a nationwide audit of Permanent Voter Cards (PVCs) because about 10million PVCs,  out of the 68million produced, have not been collected.

    But she said about 400,000 cards were yet to be delivered by the PVC vendors.

    Zakari, who spoke exclusively with THE NATION in Abuja, said she is not desperate to become a substantive chairman of INEC.

    She said she did not lobby to become the acting chairman of INEC.

    While admitting that some RECs and INEC officials are under investigation over 2015 poll, she was non-committal on the actual number or identities.

    She said: “For the commission, we won’t know the number of those under probe at the moment until the investigations are over. We always know that a person is innocent until proven guilty. For now, we are just waiting and watching.”

    She said upon the completion of her five-year term in office, she had already cleared her desk and was personally driving home when she was appointed as acting INEC chairman based on the fact that she was the most senior National Commissioner.

    “I did not lobby for it. I had packed all my things out of INEC, I wanted to leave on June 30th, I wanted to take a leave for the remaining three weeks. I felt as the commission was being depleted, that I had a sense of responsibility to sit out my three weeks. And then, I was just called on my way home after the chairman (Jega) handed over to Ambassador Wali. I was called that the Head of the Civil Service of the Federation was looking for me and I said, “what for?” and I just continued driving and I was by Bullet House by the time I got the call and I just continued driving; I was almost home when they said “come back, you have a letter to be the acting chairman” and I said ‘but somebody was appointed in the morning’, I said ‘take the letter to INEC’, but they said, ;it’s in your name, you have to come and receive it, just turn around.’ And while I was arguing, my driver decided to turn around and I called the ambassador and I told him and he said, “Go and pick your letter.” I called the former chairman and he said, “Go and pick the letter.”

    “I was confused and worried because it’s an enormous responsibility and I wasn’t really expecting it. I picked the letter and came back to the office the next day in a sober mood. I know the only thing left to do is to consolidate on the gains within this acting period, just maintain an administrative structure, try to keep the commission running administratively and then let’s see what happens, since I know the problems of the commission in terms of business processes, so we are working on communication, we are discussing with the directors, giving them responsibilities and hopefully, everything should be fine.”

    Asked if she was the most senior, she added: “Yes, there were two of us, but one of us turned 80 years and could not be appointed as acting chairman. The lot fell on me. We were the two most senior commissioners and this is not the first time INEC has had an acting commissioner. I understand Prof. Maurice Iwu was a commissioner that became a chairman.

    “When we came, Soyebi was the acting chairman and he handed over to Jega, and he conducted elections. He  had done all the procurement. The commission was running before we came. In fact, with Soyebi and Phillip Umeadi Jr., the same scenario happened. When Iwu left, he didn’t nominate an acting chairman, Umeadi took over, but the Presidency appointed Soyebi as acting chairman.”

    Mrs. Zakari said she has no filial or marital relationship with President Muhammadu Buhari, contrary to insinuations in some quarters.

    She said: “I would say Gen. Buhari did not appoint me as a commissioner; President Jonathan appointed me as a commissioner. Before that, Gen. Obasanjo appointed me as special assistant, posted to FCT where I was secretary for Health, Agriculture and Social Development at the same time.

    “At the time President Jonathan came, he was looking for people that have integrity, that’s what I was told and I found myself in the commission and I did my best.

    “For somebody to say Gen. Buhari knew me and gave me the job, obviously he knew I am a hard worker and he is a principled person. I have never known him to be nepotistic, he is a very principled person. If there are familial ties, the principle would have rubbed off on that family. I come from a very principled family, my father survived two regimes that were jailing and sacking people and he survived both and for that, I don’t think I would do anything that would jeopardize that principle.

    “ I can’t say the general is my in-law. I  am not married to his son; my daughter is not married to him, that is what I understand about being an in-law. But obviously in life, you have acquaintances, people you have known. But I think people should not get distracted by this ‘family or no family’. Am I competent? Can I deliver? Can I conduct my affairs with integrity? “The President’s message is for people to be honest and to have integrity.”

    On PVCs, Mrs. Zakari said INEC will soon begin a nationwide audit of the cards.”

    Pressed to talk on whether or not she is determined to head INEC, she said: “I am not desperate. God decides who becomes leader; if God decides I would be the one to continue, I will have to do my best.”

    She continued: “We have about 58million PVCs collected so far, which is about 81 per cent, out of 68million produced. We have about 10million PVCs uncollected.  We still have about 400,000 PVCs not produced. So, we are going to resume the distribution of PVCs, but we cannot just bring out those PVCs and begin to distribute them until we are sure they belong to living human beings.

    “We are planning our modalities for distribution. But before that we are going out to the field to conduct PVC audit in all the states. On Thursday, we had a meeting with all our Resident Electoral Commissioners (RECs) and the topic of discussion was resumption of PVC distribution and Continuous Voters Registration (CVR).

    Asked when INEC will go to the field, she added:  “Like I told the RECs yesterday, the audit will start by next week but as for the PVC distribution we have to come up with a water-tight process so that the PVCs will not get into wrong hands especially as we are having Kogi and Bayelsa elections. We have to scientifically determine how we are going to do the distribution, so that we just don’t go out to the field and it becomes a different story.

    For the CVR, the plan was laid out before RECs on Thursday, but they had reservations on the process and we have to go back to the drawing board and do a proper planning. We don’t mind to plan for six months so that when it takes off, we will ensure we have a plan that can withstand pressure,  except for minor changes,  rather than we just take off because we want to please Nigerians and we end up having complaints and hitches along the way. We have set up a committee to look at the modalities and then we will still call the RECs back and agree on the modalities, because the new direction of INEC is a bottom to top approach and take decisions in an inclusive manner with the people that implement decisions rather than the commission just deciding on the processes.”

  • Budget 2015 : House to probe non-implementation of capital allocation

    The House of Representatives has set up an Ad-hoc Committee to investigate what it called, the “non-implementation of Capital budget and serial violation of the Fiscal Responsibility Act.”

    Speaker of the House of Representatives said the Committee would investigate the level of implementation of the capital expenditure of the 2015 Appropriation Act.

    N556,995,465,449 was earmarked for capital expenditure in the 2015 budget, while   N4.9 trillion was approved by the National Assembly and signed into law by President Goodluck Jonathan.

    Hon. Ahmed Pategi (APC-Kwara) is the chairman of the Committee which is also to ascertain the performance of the Federal Ministry of Finance in carrying out its mandate as contained in the Appropriation Act, and section 30 (1,2) of the Fiscal Responsibility Act 2007. The Committees report is expected  to be submitted to the House on resumption which is about the last quarter of the 2015 financial year.

    The resolution was sequel to the passage of a motion moved under privilege by Hon. Patrick Asadu (PDP, Enugu).

    Asadu in the motion titled:  “Non-Implementation of Capital Projects as Contained in the 2015 Appropriation Act; Federal Government Budget and Serial Breach of the Fiscal Responsibility Act by the Federal Ministry of Finance, and Threats to my Effective Representation of my Constituency,” requested for the investigation and determine the extent to which  the budget was  implemented and its effects on the nation’s economy.

    He pointed out that the 1999 constitution, sections 80-83 clearly stipulates how monies belonging to the federal Republic of Nigeria can be kept and spent and clearly vests in the National Assembly the powers to appropriate monies for expenditure by government.

    “By sections 81 and 82 of the 1999 constitution as amended, the federal Government expenditures must be either as direct charges on the constitution, as contained in the Appropriation Act or supplementary Appropriation Acr where applicable, or as may be specifically prescribed by the National Assembly, while section 30(1) of the Fiscal Responsibility Act, clearly mandates the Hon. Minister of Finance through the Budget Office, to monitor and evaluate the implementation of the annual budget, and assess the attainment of fiscal targets and report thereon on a quarterly basis to the Joint Finance Committee of the National Assembly, and to also publish same in the mass and electronic media not later than 30 days after the end of each quarter of the financial year,” he said.

    The lawmaker further stated that “Since there has not being any constitutional amendment adjusting the financial year by the National Assembly nor has any public announcement has been made by the Ministry of Finance in any mass and electronic media on the implementation of the budget and attainment of fiscal targets”, he said.

    He noted that Section 81 and 82 of the 1999 constitution as amended, provides that Federal Government expenditures must be either direct charges on the constitution, as contained in the Appropriation Act or Supplementary Appropriation Act while applicable or as may be specifically prescribed by the National Assembly.

  • Calabar dredging project chief: I’m not afraid of probe

    Calabar dredging project chief: I’m not afraid of probe

    The Managing Director of Calabar Channel Management Limited (CCM), Mr. Bart Van Eenoo, has said his company is not afraid of a probe instituted by some maritime stakeholders.

    In a statement yesterday in Abuja, Eenoo urged those doubting the capability of his company to execute the contract to ask questions, instead of maligning the company.

    The company chief said he was at the headquarters of the Nigerian Ports Authority (NPA) in Lagos to pay for the Calabar channel contract.

    He said the company had competent manpower of about 8,000 workers, including those recruited from Boskalis and Dredging International of Belgium.

    Eenoo wondered why detractors portrayed CCM as incapable to execute the project.

    The company chief said the CCM consortium, led by Messrs Niger Global Engineering and Technical Company Limited (NGET), had the world’s number one dredging company – Royal Boskalis of Holland and Westminster Dredging – as its partners.

    He said this showed the seriousness CCM attached to the project.

    Eenoo said CCM had not demobilised from site, as reported, adding that contrary to the claims by the Calabar chapter of the Shippers Association, its office is located at 101, Ndidem Usang Iso Street in Calabar, the Cross River State capital.

    According to him,  the importance CCM attaches to the project, considering its economic significance to the nation, the Northcentral, Southeast and Southsouth, made its technical and financial partners to fund the project until a week ago when the NPA started paying for last year’s fourth quarter certified invoices for works executed.

    Eenoo said: “Even when we were not paid, as provided in the contract agreement, our technical and financial partners were funding the project to ensure that there was no lull in activities. So for, a group of persons are alleging that we are not on site and that our address is unknown. That is sheer mischief.”