Tag: really

  • Is the customer really king?

    Is the customer really king?

    The customer is king is a common saying in commerce. Is this real in Nigeria? In this report, Tonia Diyan captures the dilemma of shoppers who found it difficult getting compensation for poor services.

    Most people usually look forward to a wonderful ex- perience anytime they go shopping. But the irony, however, is that this is not often the case.

    For many, the harrowing experience they face at shopping malls literally remians with them for life.

    But why would a seller treat an old or potential customer with disdain knowing that the survival of the business rests with the customer? Simple as this question may be, the answer is not easy.

    Miss Kunmbi Anifowose, a retail consultant, had discovered that, over the years, what shoppers brood about is the violation of trust.

    According to her, a bad return experience can ruin the retailer-customer relationship with their preferred store.

    In Nigeria, most stores do not practise good customer service, forgetting that it enhances sales.

    For Anifowose, customer service shouldn’t end once a purchase is made. It should start the moment a shopper walks into a store whether he purchases an item or not, she said.

    Retailers avoid customers telling them that the transaction between them and the shopper was a failure. Retailers do not like to hear things like ‘I found something better, or a better price elsewhere.’ This is a test for retailers, which, according to findings, they often fail and their businesses suffer.

    Horrible experiences

    A shopper, Miss Rita Okodili,  bought a laptop in Ikeja, Lagos. It turned out that the item didn’t charge very well. She returned to the store where she bought it, having read their return policy of ‘return within seven days and get a product exchange or refund’ which according to her is the attraction for buying. Rita, in her late 20s, lamented that she was offered a four-day repair instead. This made her to abandon the store.

    Many stores have tough return policies . The big problem is, in some instance, a retailer’s reputation as a worthly brand with outstanding customer service sometimes does not match the customer’s experience. Big retailers sometimes fall  short of what the customer expects, and the customer feels disappointed.

    Like Rita, when Tolani Awonuga, another shopper, goes to the mall these days, she walks by a once-favourite store. Why? She wasn’t able to return a gift she once bought without its receipt. Tolani says she shops at stores that will take returns without receipts, but the shop is the only one that gave her a cold shoulder. That’s because, Tolani said, she had patronised the store since its inception and she’d expected that due to her loyalty, as well as the amount of money charged by the store for its items, the retailer would have a more flexible return policy.

    Rita and Tolani’s experience isn’t mere annoyance. It suggests betrayal. Tolani’s long-standing relationship with the store was severed by what she perceived to be a breach of promise, and a sales clerk with bad manners delivering the blow made it all seem very personal.

    “If her sense of fairness hadn’t been violated, she would have happily continued to shop at the store,”  Kunmbi said.

    Noting that retailers are losing customers over restrictive return policies, Kunmbi raised some posers: “Why are they not putting these policies into practice? The answer is that returns are costly, and stores try to control costs by restricting returns.”

    Retail experts have said a simple and easy return policy boosts sales, as shoppers are more willing to make purchases with the knowledge that returning them won’t be a hassle.

    On the other hand, if too many returns are made, it causes havoc to the retailer.

    Authenticity, transparency and “living up to promises” are important values to consumers.

    Retailers use imagery, emotion, and symbolism to craft an enticing image—which becomes the personality of the store. That image is an unspoken promise of a particular  shopping experience. It’s the retailer’s job to ensure that every consumer touchpoint lives up to the promise of a store’s image, including returns.

    Several online retailers have found that it’s wise to be especially accommodating with returns. Some of these stores offer free shipping on deliveries and returns, as well as a return policy that’s as hassle-free as they come. ‘Return in 14 days with labels’ they’ve built a popular business, on the philosophy that frequent returners are also frequent buyers.

    However, experts have suggested few simple tips shoppers can take to minimise the agony of store returns.

    Among other things, shoppers are advised to check the retailer’s return policy before buying an item, particularly when shopping online. It is important to know that discount retailers often do not take returns but will offer a merchandise credit, but not a refund.

    Besides, shoppers are asked to keep receipts, attach to items purchased and not remove tags until he is sure the item is in good condition. It is also important, according to experts, to store all receipts in the same place in case the product is defective. This is because retailers have found that over 14 percent of returns without receipts are fraudulent and are, therefore, requiring receipts for returns.

    Experts said be prepared before bringing in a return. Preparation lessens the likelihood of conflict and speeds up the return process. Item receipt and identity card are important as well as treating the merchandise one is returning to with respect.

    Though shoppers are sure to encounter disrespectful salespeople, especially at commission-based stores, it won’t help to get angry, or be emotional, particularly when the item is not worn or damaged.

  • Who really is Fayose?

    By this day next month, Ekiti people would have voted for whoever they desire to be the governor of the state now labeled as land of honour. To the people, the next term of four years is vital – whether the state must continue to be transformed or imposed to be downgraded.

    One of those struggling to take power from the incumbent governor who is also interested in returning to office to complete his indubitable labour thus far is former office holder Peter Ayodele Fayose. The name rings bell because of the way he administered Ekiti State in three and a half years before he was impeached

    What then makes Fayose a known name? Who indeed is he that wants to return to a place where he was yanked out from? Fayose remains a character that must be understood to the fore of being declared as popular. What really were those concepts in him that he now claims have changed?

    Fayose’s travails began when the Economic and Financial Crime Commission (EFCC) investigated varied allegations of corruption, money laundering and diversion of local government funds against him. The commission found him prima facie guilty.

    Apart from being accused of financial misappropriation, he was also attached to murder and probed by a panel of inquiry that found him guilty with recommendation for impeachment. He was later impeached along with his deputy.

    Some people might have been arguing about the constitutionality of his removal, but the end course of the constitution is to make the people contented. Most Ekiti people were happy about Fayose’s removal as governor. Youths were seen dancing around the state capital in several motorcades without violence.

    Ahead of his removal from office, Ekiti elite and intelligentsia could not comply with his fashion of leadership. To them, Fayose was a plain ruffian and hooligan responsible for consecutive dismal and depressing misdemeanours. He was consistently connected to crimes committed in the state during his tenure. Till today, the same category of indigenes still arraign his government as contrary to  the peaceful and unruffled state experienced under the preceding administration of Otunba Niyi Adebayo and the incumbent Governor Kayode Fayemi.

    There were indeed many instances of tension and chaos under his reign. Factually, there were several allegations of killing attempts and real killings under him. His one-time deputy out of many, Abiodun Aluko, had cause to write to the then President Olusegun Obasanjo alleging that his life was being threatened in the course of his conflict with his boss. About a dozen students of the College of Education, Ikere-Ekiti were lost when he Fayose was alleged to be involved in shooting on campuses.

    The then chairman of Ado Local Government, Taiye Fasubaa escaped death by the whiskers when gunmen stormed his house at the peak of his disagreement with Fayose. Crisis reached its peak on May 28, 2005 at a councillorship bye-election in Ifaki. Voting was going on smoothly when Fayose arrived and PDP supporters allegedly assaulted members of the opposition which led to the death of Tunji Omojola, an in-law to the National Conscience Party candidate. Correspondingly, notable Dr. Ayo Daramola was murdered in his Ijan town chiefly on the belief that he had indicated intent to wrestle governorship power from Fayose in 2007.

    Fayose and his gang in Ado disorganized a rally where the Alliance for Democracy was having the inauguration of the party executive. It was alleged that he was seen personally shooting gun into the crowd with his followers vandalizing cars and beating up people.

    That he had no admiration and respect for the traditional rulers and distinguished citizens of the state was irrefutable. Apart from the report that a chieftain was cased inside car boot, he was unruly to the Ewi of Ado, the Ogoga of Ikere; he detracted peace from the Onijan of Ijan Ekiti.

    Chief Afe Babalola (SAN) was forced to begin to sweat when his life was no longer safe, alleging some agents sponsored by the Fayose government were threatening to kill him. He had stated that Fayose had no right to deduct funds that ordinarily belonged to local governments without knowing that by that he had hurt him where it pained him most.

    At a stage, Fayose wanted to transfer part of the state secretariat from the capital to his Afao-Ekiti village under another local government. The Ewi and Ado Progressive Union objected. When Babalola supported his people’s objection, Fayose descended heavily on him and the Ewi claiming they influenced Obasanjo to oppose his move.

    The same Babalola built and donated an auditorium to the Faculty of Law of the state university.  He suggested that since the President was coming, he should commission the building. Fayose was furious at the suggestion and boasted that it was over his dead body that the President would commission the project. After the President’s visit, Fayose made series of media propaganda in which he referred to Babalola as a “useless elder statesman” from Ado-Ekiti living in Ibadan. After his impeachment, he was in Okuku to declare Obasanjo who brought him to power as “father of the bastards.” Many more disrespects!

    Fayose is now claiming he has become a changed man in maturity. But Ekiti State former Governor Segun Oni who knows who he is uttered that “when you know his sponsors and how he ‘won’ the primaries he claimed to have won, you would know that he, indeed, has changed for the worse.” His apology being offered to Babalola and Femi Falana(SAN) today over his crisis with them is seen by many as cosmetic.

    Indeed, he might now be claiming to be a superman just because he speaks the local dialect and pretends to adore the dilemma of the illiterates. To his fellow hoodlums, Fayose might be one that could be seen, felt and accessed easily. He comes around whenever he needs them, eats and drinks with them at the bukatarias as if that would modify their lives in poverty and deficiency.

    Tell me how his claim of connection to grassroots can be compared to Governor Fayemi’s creative regular monthly stipends to the hitherto abandoned aged who could have died in hunger and poverty.

    Ekiti people themselves must douse the political tension in the state by supporting their votes to ensure free election that will guarantee freedom and progress. What the people of knowledge want is a total change of heart, commitment to tolerate opposition and allow them the chance to exist.

    For Fayose to live a meaningful life, he must not see his current aspiration as the end of his life. Let him know that taking back Ekiti through PDP cannot be sustained by violence against professed opponents that are committed to true transformation of the state that is being currently worked to become a land of honour in deed and in truth.

    The PDP leadership decided to pick as governorship candidate a failed politician who in his last contest was beaten in a Senatorial election. They couldn’t recollect his pending case with EFCC about his billion naira fraudulent deals with a non-existing Ekiti State poultry. Still unresolved was his claim to obtain Higher National Diploma Certificate without the proof that he was a student of Ibadan Polytechnic and not a danfo driver.

    The party denounced other contestants who are more civil simply because it wants to wage war, as declared by Vice President Namadi Sambo, against the people of Ekiti. To them, Fayose is the one that can be used to restore upheaval and tension in the state.

    If a Fayose is being used as candidate in Ekiti, it is not surprising that an Omisore of same worth has been picked to run in the State of Osun. Or why should a Kashamu just be pulled out (as his name means) to lead in Ogun State and mobilize the zone for the party when he dares not travel to United States today where trial is awaiting him as a drug baron?

    An Obanikoro who is a debunker is being empowered to lead the party in Lagos State to deflate the reformation which is apparent even to the blind. In Oyo State, defamed Akala is also the party’s muscle!

    In Ekiti of today, it cannot be denied that the one in power is truly transforming the state, doing what he promised to do. So, the re-emergence of that which remains in doubt must be cast away. The state cannot afford to be downgraded to the land of rash again.   

  • APC: Really, what’s in a name?

    Rather than focus on tackling the plentiful challenges pinning down Nigeria, it is depressing that politicians are now making acronym of political parties to become the nation’s prime issue two years ahead of the 2015 election. The altercation has been between the ruling Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and the merging opposition, All Progressives Congress (APC).

    On February 6, three major opposition parties (Action Congress of Nigeria, All Nigeria Peoples Party and Congress for Progressive Change), along with a faction of All Progressive Grand Alliance came together to declare a merger. Many saw it as an astute and smart move to dislodge the non-performing party in power. Few weeks after, the mega party released its logo and slogan, expressing determination to effect change of the miserable state of the nation. Of course, PDP that earlier openly welcomed the merger put its real inner anxiety to work. Its precedence to just hold on to power became clear.

    Suddenly, a proxy African Peoples Congress emerged with an emergency letter of intent to be registered as a party with contraction APC title and rushed to the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) office without any interaction with the commission’s officials and without requisite information. The apparent purpose was to frustrate the registration of the mega party with APC acronym.

    As the controversy was overwhelming serious challenges of the nation, another ‘APC’ tagged All Patriotic Citizens was brought up.

    Although the personalities of All Progressives Congress had earlier been made known, until last week, the list of representatives of the other intended APCs, their board of trustees, the address of its headquarters in Abuja and the list of its offices in the states were not disclosed – not even the promoters. And since INEC claimed it cannot shut its doors to any group seeking to register as a political party, the hullabaloo on the issue of which of the parties should hold APC acronym has now become media headlines.

    It has been a deliberately engineered distractive uproar. From its arrival, it was clear that the mega APC has political adversaries, equipped with bamboozling political weapons and foxes being garnered to blemish the vine. While PDP was quick to state it was not bothered by the coming together of the progressive forces, it has become apparent that it has surely been having sleepless nights and working round the clock to devise measures to sabotage powerful opposition unification capable of sweeping it off the throne it boasted to occupy for 50 years. The parties’ inclusion was to be discouraged and extricated with the emergency creation of another so-called APC through foul and smelly means.

    In truth, acronym “APC” is nobody’s birthright. But the tricky machination of the hidden motivator of the surrogate APCs is a further indication of disingenuous purpose of holding on to power for self-augmentation and enrichment rather than performance essential service to the people. This is why I agree that merging of the opposition that could enable it take power legitimately from PDP should be more of devotion to serving the people. Convincing Nigerians on how to turn the battered country around from its present squalor of poverty and insecurity to the consigned land of greatness must be focal point far above a war on acronym. And this is why the authentic APC should not loose any sleep because of this scam of the political fraudsters. It should rather make merger better-built and stronger.

    This is to say that with the failing situation in the country today, the merged APC can decide to supplant the fake APC and its mentor and turn the circumstance to advantage by picking on its plan B. Mere change of name can rattle the fraudsters to their roots. Afterall, when God changed the names of Abram to Abraham, Sarai to Sarah and Jacob to Israel in the Bible, their lives being hassled by the devil ended up in fulfillment.

    How many years has PDP been in power with nothing to show for its stewardship other than corruption, insecurity and decay of infrastructures? Sometimes ago at the 60th National Executive Council meeting of the PDP, President Goodluck Jonathan as the party leader himself admitted the failure of the party to perform. He conceded that it was found intricate to deliver on campaign promises on the excuse that his administration was being distracted by security challenges, especially the threat posed by the Islamist sect, Boko Haram, which has claimed responsibility for bombings in the North. Thousands have died in the terrorism attacks which have largely been targeted at churches and other public places.

    Recounting insecurity as the most fundamental issue his administration is wrestling with, the President added that the challenges have stood in the way of delivering on the ruling party’s campaign promises. He listed job creation and power supply as priority areas that were meant to be addressed seriously in sincerity but which have been overshadowed by insecurity.

    But Mr. President did not get it right. Insecurity is not peculiar to Nigeria.  To use it as excuse for non-performance stunned many faithful Nigerians. Is it insecurity that is responsible for massive corruption for which politicians and leaders are involved?  Could the activities of Boko Haram be the issue affecting some of the states being governed by PDP in the South East, South-South and most parts of the North where terrorism was not afflicting? It was as if he was unconscious of the fact that people might because of his failure be preparing to vote with their conscience come 2015 for leaders who will be steadfast to hold responsibilities of challenges of their offices.

    It has been repeated over and over: Boko Haram is by-product of corruption in the high places. Or was there any Boko Haram 14 years ago when PDP was enthroned? Yet, those in power have squandered every scrap of public goodwill and the country has turned into an underworld with political and business cabals creaming from the top, and the masses being robbed and blown up on the floor.

    The biggest threat to Nigeria as a nation is not Boko Haram; it is the current ruling class and their voracious desire for self-enrichment, no matter the cost to the nation state. Nigeria is being wrecked and ruled by corrupt tyrants wearing the facade of democracy. Let it be known that it is either we change course, or we will further plunge headlong into global oblivion the day oil fails to bring in the cheap revenue that is unfortunately dragging the nation down.

    We should not expect any good from evil. As long as we decide not to know what PDP stands for, the dilemma remains ours. The fact is it is PDP at the centre that is collapsing the country. Those who see nothing wrong in the nation’s continuing decline might support the party as long it is still in power where they too can partake and benefit in its unrighteousness.

    Impactful change for the better will come when the main focus of the opposition parties is to make the PDP drown in its election rigging, manipulations, support for corruption (note the on-going presidential error of the pardon granted Chief Diepriye Alamieyeseigha and others?) and non-performance. The nation would only move forward when peoples’ wills are permitted and elections are not rigged to continue to steal public fund. This is why genuine alternatives to failure must get prepared for a big fight as political thieves will not give in easily.

    Yet, for the opposition to succeed come 2015, notwithstanding the approved chosen name, it will take the kind of stance Governor Adams Oshiomhole gave them in Edo State to remove the PDP from power: excellent performance that will naturally compel people’s followership.

  • OSAZE  ROARS:I’m really a good guy

    OSAZE ROARS:I’m really a good guy

    Controversial Nigerian attacker, Peter Odemwingie, has taken time to make a case for himself in the face of growing criticism directed at him.

    The 31-year-old was overlooked by Nigeria coach, Stephen Keshi for the 2013 Africa Cup of Nations in South Africa for reasons many believed to be unrelated to his abilities on the pitch.

    He was subsequently frozen out of the West Bromwich Albion squad after he tried to force a move to Premier League’s bottom club, Queens Park Rangers.

    The attacker reckons his many problems are not down to a “bad attitude” but his “transparency.”

    “When I give all my heart and effort to a team and get overlooked after, how could I possibly be happy ? Same in Eagles. Same in WBA,” he explained via his verified Twitter account, @OdemwingieP on Monday.

    The former Lokomotiv Moscow forward then took the time to highlight the reasons he has come under the spotlight for the wrong reasons in recent days.

    “Well praised and most criticised at the same time. Something is wrong somewhere. And I bet it’s not in my attitude. I believe in transparency.”

    He then gave his thoughts on corruption in modern day sports.

    “Too much corruption in sports these days. Because of few sportsmen who cheat now doping control went from urine to blood test. “

    Odemwingie who has 55 caps for Nigeria’s Super Eagles then discussed “indiscipline” in the national team.

    “When Eagles were moved from a decent hotel to a very average one. Coach said to me : few of the boys are indiscipline. In Africa we want to be more organised and we use Europe as an example. Yet we listen to our grandfathers who are not exposed to latest. Stats in sports speak louder than beliefs,” he posted on Twitter.

    Odemwingie famously fell out with former Nigeria coach, Samson Siasia and the WBA attacker tried to reveal the reasons for the impasse. He revealed that his “commitment” to club duties was responsible for the misunderstanding.

    “Very little thing made me fall out with ex Eagles coach Siasia, and that’s club commitment. And that commitment was questioned after,” he noted.

    Odemwingie then took the time to hand some pieces of advice to members of the Nigerian team that won the 2013 AFCON in South Africa.

    “What did that teach me ? You only a good guy and professional when you score and give your teams what they want. They throw us out after. Coaches, players etc. a coach the country is praising now will one day be sacked and to his achievements they’ll say: only one cup? I beg. “

    He then took a swipe at Nigerian football administrators for “failing to treat former internationals right.”

    “It’s time to change consciousness a bit in naija. Yekini (may his soul RIP) our legend died in poverty. The way our big men spraying now. Wish they looked after our heroes when old and in need the way they giving out now. Femi Opabunmi lost his sight and struggling to feed now. The boy got medals and many caps for naija. T. West I heard not so comfortable and few other. Glo and Mtn please compete who gives them more.”

    The striker who began his professional football education in Nigeria with Bendel Insurance in 2000 then accused Nigerian coaches of failure to select players on merit to the national teams.

    “I now don’t blame our coaches much when they accept gifts from players. Time is short. Our system has to be sorted. We moving too slow.

    “One Russian man said : when you hear patriotism talks too much ? Somebody is eating a lot somewhere. Every state in naija that produced ex internationals should engage them to community services in form of teaching kids and youths. #pension,” he tweeted.

    On how Nigerian sports could improve and achieve its full potentials, Odemwingie also voiced his sentiments.

    “Every 20 km in our cities should have a basketball court like in US. That’s why they so good at it,” he wrote.

    Aliko Dangote, Tony Elumelu and a few other Nigerian philanthropists splashed financial rewards on the victorious Nigerian 2013 AFCON squad but Odemwingie was not impressed.

    “Only if we win a tournament we realise football is so important and our billionaires come out. They did well. We want more ! Haha,” he said.

    He then revealed that he would be “doing something” to give back to the game that brought him so much fame and fortune when he eventually calls time on his career.

    “I will come out with something after my carrier (career) is over and set up something. Few of my boys are learning now and preparing. This is no sweet talking. Never been my style and never will be. Me and Freddy Kanu already working on something for few months now,” he revealed.