Tag: recapitalisation

  • Unity Bank’s directors meet on recapitalisation

    Directors of Unity Bank Plc will next week meet to review the bank’s ongoing recapitalisation plan and performance in the immediate past business year.

    Unity Bank Plc Company Secretary, Mohammed Shehu, said the bank‘s board will meet to consider the bank’s financial statement and accounts for the year ended December 31, 2018.

    Another major item on the agenda of the crucial board meeting is the ongoing capital raising efforts of the bank.

    Unity Bank has been discussing with new major equity investors that are expected to inject new funds and expertise into the commercial bank as it seeks to beef up its capital base.

    The bank’s board of directors confirmed that discussions have reached advanced stage in the planned recapitalisation by prospective investors and the bank might soon announce the transactions.

    The ongoing discussions with prospective investors, the bank said, had led to extensive review of the bank’s operations by the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN).

    “We are pleased to inform our stakeholders that discussions with our prospective investors are progressing according to plan and will be concluded shortly, following which necessary regulatory approvals would be sought and announcement made,” the bank said in a regulatory filing signed by Shehu.

    Key extracts of the third quarter report of Unity Bank for the period ended September 30, 2018 showed that gross earnings dropped from N65.03 billion in 2017 to N26.125 billion in 2018. Interest income had declined from N63.15 billion to N20.409 billion. Operating income stood at N15.54 billion in 2018 as against N40.39 billion in 2017. Profit before tax slumped to N643.78 million, from N2.72 billion. Profit after tax dwindled to N585.84 million in third quarter 2018 as against N2.448 billion in third quarter 2017. With these, earnings per share dropped from 20.94 kobo to 5.01 kobo.

  • FMB seeks N500b for recapitalisation

    The Federal Mortgage Bank (FMB), is seeking Federal Government’s approval for N500 billion  to enable it recapitalise the financial institution

    Its Managing Director,  Ahmed Dangiwa, told State House correspondents at  the end of a closed door meeting with Vice President, Yemi Osinbajo, in Abuja, that the recapitalisation of the bank would attract over 10 times its current investment level of both local and informal investors.

    He said: “We have to seek recapitalisation because even commercial banks have recapitalised over time. N5 billion has been the share capital of the bank but only N2.5 billion has been paid.

    “Even even other Private Mortgage Banks (PMB) have capitalised over N5 billion. With the recapitalisation of N500 billion, we will attract investment both local and informal; over 10 times of that investment and it is going to reposition the bank properly.”

    On the purpose of his visit to the Villa, he said: “We came to see the Vice President as a follow up to our request on capitalisation and other requests and also to brief the Vice-President about our activities so far.

    “We have briefed him on some of the activities we have rolled out like the Rent to Own and the introduction of equity contributions by the NHF that we have just commenced.”

    On the new initiatives of the bank, he said: “What is new is that with the Rent to Own product, you don’t need to have any equity contribution and secondly, you enter into the house as a tenant and over years, it becomes your own just like owner occupier basis.

    “It reduces debt turn around time; you find out that off-takers, they do not need to go through any PMB to that loan.

    “You just find the estate that you want and you enter there in collaboration with your employer and then the house becomes your own.

    “It has started already; we have funded estates all over the country; over 20 states of the federation which any contributor to NHF can now go and choose the house you want within those estates. FMB offices within those states will then profile you and then send to the head office for approval.”

    According to him, Osinbajo appreciated the efforts that the management was making; and promised to take it to the National Economic Council (NEC) meeting for further deliberations.

    The bank, he said, has committed over N65 billion to the project.

    He said the bank did not have much challenge apart from the fact that it wants people to come in and know that NHF was working; and to know that the estates were there for people to go and choose and then move in.

  • Recapitalisation: investor proposes 10-year roadmap

    An investor has proposed a 10-year recapitalisation roadmap that would enable life insurance companies raise their capital to N20 billion; general operators, N30 billion and composite firms, N50 billion.

    Lancelot Ventures Limited Managing Director, Adebayo Adeleke, who is also a shareholder in many insurance firms, said this at the third National Conference of the National Association of Insurance and Pension Correspondents (NAIPCO) in Lagos.

    He added that three-tier recapitalisation roadmap should be clearly thought out and spanned over 10 years.

    According to him, the first phase of recapitalisation should be within a period of 18 months and Life underwriters should raise their capital from N2billion to N4billion and General Business Operators move from N3billion to N5billion.

    He said in the second phase, which should be three years after the first exercise, Life operators should move their capital to N8billion; non-life, N10billion and composite, N18billion.

    He maintained that in the third phase, which should be five years  after the second recapitalisation exercise, Life underwriters should beef-up their capital to N20billion, General Business underwriters, N30 billion and composite firms, N50 billion.

    He called on the National Insurance Commission (NAICOM) to evolve templates and incentives for mergers and acquisitions to enable strong firms absolve weak ones, as against waiting for firms to be bankrupt, and then take over the management.

    In a similar vein, Past President, Chartered Insurance Institute of Nigeria (CIIN), Bala Zakariya’u, has urged regulators in the financial services industry to create the enabling environment for mega  companies to be established through mergers and acquisitions, adding that “such mega financial institutions are to be tasked with higher capital and solvency, sophisticated information technology infrastructure, best in class human resources and strong brand presence.

    Zakariya’u further said the mega institutions should also have better all-round capacities and connections, as well as cognate strategies to deepen market penetration and enhance finance inclusion.

    While fears may be expressed that creating mega institutions may lead to the emergence of ‘companies, which may be too big to fail and is every regulator’s nightmare, he believed ‘this ought to be a preferred nightmare, than what we currently have by default: companies, which are too small to succeed.’

  • CEOs anxious over insurance industry recapitalisation

    THERE is anxiety in the insurance industry over the recapitalisation directive issued by the National Insurance Commission (NAICOM) to Chief Executive Officers (CEOs).

    Some CEOs have kept mum over the new development that will categorise them into Tier 1, Tier 2 and Tier 3; others are worried over the ‘’wrong’’ timing of the regulator’s directive.

    NAICOM last week introduced a Tier-Based Minimum Solvency Capital (TBMSC) structure, a complementary measure to its ongoing implementation of the Risk-Based Supervision (RBS) model that will lead to recapitalisation by the risk-bearing firms.

    It said with effect from January 1, next year, the companies will be classified into three different tiers based on their individual strength and capacity to underwrite big or small risk. Under the new arrangement, Tier 1 companies will be considered as the biggest player, Tier 2, the middle player and Tier 3, the smallest player.

    One of the CEOs, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said it is worrisome why the regulator should choose this time of the year to roll out such a directive.

    Though he said had nothing against the Commission’s plan to make companies recapitalise, he faulted the timing, which he said, wasn’t appropriate considering the imminence of a general election in the country.

    He said aside that it would be difficult to achieve the set target in five months,  it would be also be extremely difficult to raise money during an election year.

    He said: “We are not saying that recapitalisation is not good, but the timing is inappropriate. Election is coming next year and it will be difficult to raise money. The Commission expects us to merge or acquire, but it will be difficult to achieve either of these in five months.

    “The operators and the regulator just started the rebranding process of the industry. We need to win the people’s trust and the regulator is now talking of Tier 1, Tier 2 and Tier 3.”

    Another CEO kept mum, but continuously said: “It is well” when contacted while another said he and his management team are preparing to meet with the Board of Directors to brief them on the implications of the new development.

    Another CEO urged the regulator to be cautious of the likely negative impact the move would have on the image of operators in the industry.

    According to him, classifying a company small and big creates a negative image for the companies as not many people would like to go and patronise a company already classified as small by no less and organisation than the regulator.

    The RBS model will see the insurance industry recapitalise following the recapitalisation exercise carried out in 2007.

     

  • Insurance firms get N15b recapitalisation mandate

    Insurance companies willing to play at the highest level in the country yesterday got an order from the regulator to recapitalise to the tune of N15 billion.

    The National Insurance Commission (NAICOM) which announced the new plan yesterday, also said the firms in the sector will from January be classified into three tiers, based on their ability to capitalise and the functions they perform.

    This is in line with the Risk Based Supervision (RBS) model which requires a composite insurance company that intends to be a Tier 1 player to have a minimum capital of N15 billion; A Tier 2 player is required to have a minimum solvency capital of N7.5 billion while a Tier 3 player is expected to have N5 billion minimum capital.

    Under life companies class of business, a Tier 3 company will only be allowed to underwrite Individual Life, Health Insurance and Miscellenous Insurance business, Tier 2 company will underwrite all Tier 3 risks and Group Life Assurance while Tier 1 company will be allowed to underwrite all Tier 2 risks and Annuity business.

    Hitherto, the capitalization of insurance industries, which last took place in 2007, gave Tier 1 firms N5billion capitalization base, Tier 2 N3bilion and Tier 3 N2billion.

    Commissioner for Insurance Mohammed Kari, announced the new threshold at an emergency meeting with Chief Executive Officers (CEOs) of the 57 licensed  insurance companies yesterday.

    He said no insurance company’s licence will be withdrawn but the new arrangement will be implemented from January 1.

    Kari, who was represented by the Director, Supervision, the National Insurance Commission (NAICOM) Barineka Thompson, described the recapitalisation as desirable because while inflation and interest rates had increased in the last 10 years, insurers were still operating with the 2007 capitalization.

    He said: “Interest rate has gone from single to double digit, interest rate has increased over time and with many macroeconomic and institutional factors on the upward trends, while the industry still maintains the same capitalisation in the last 10 years.

    “So, it is desirable for operators to now choose which tier they want to operate in. Some companies are finding it difficult to fulfill their obligations to their policy holders and shareholders because they are carrying risks above their limits.”

    He added that the initiative would enhance profitability of insurers through optimal capitalization, adding that there is no cancellation of licence, but operators will be subjected to solvency control levels.

    The commission has slated August 6-10 for awareness session with board members and key management staff of insurance companies. The transition guideline will be released on August 3. Issuance of notification letter on assessed capital level will be between August 13 and 17 and submission of board’s decision by operators to NAICOM will be not later than September 14.

    Deputy Commissioner for Insurance Mr. Sunday Thomas added that the recapitalisation scheme is aimed at developing and applying appropriate tools that consider the nature, scale and complexity of insurers, as well as non-core activities of insurance groups, to limit significant systemic risk and thereby achieve soundness of insurance companies and contribute to the achievement of stability of the financial system.

  • Unity Bank clarifies plan for recapitalisation

    •Says no agreement on Milost Global

    Unity Bank Plc yesterday clarified that it did not enter into any definitive agreement or sign any binding commitment with Milost Global Incorporation.

    At an interactive session at the Nigerian Stock Exchange (NSE) yesterday in Lagos, the management of the bank stated that it had with the mandate of shareholders of the bank had engaged in series of discussions and engagement with prospective value-plus investors. Milost Global was one of the prospective investors introduced to the bank.

    The bank stated that all through the process of engaging prospective investors, it was properly guided by the extant regulations concerning capital raising and equally made the process open to all prospective investors.

    “It is not unusual that this introduction and expression of interests would involve some level of preliminary discussions and exchange of nonbinding documentary communications between the intending parties towards establishing mutual foundation on which the transaction contemplated will be initiated,” Unity Bank noted.

    According to the bank, the purported “term sheet” dated September 4, 2017 said to have been executed was a “proposal” submitted by Milost Global Inc “for discussion purposes only and not a commitment” by the parties.

    “No definitive documentation governing the proposed financing was executed,” the bank clarified.

    The bank stated that there was no agreement whatsoever with Milost Global alluding to its acquisition of 60 per cent equity stake in Unity Bank and there was no iota of truth in the allegation that the bank had executed a ”binding commitment agreement”.

    “The bank’s position is on the premise that a document prepared by Milost and which the bank acknowledged merely contained the suggested terms and conditions on which Milost was planning to consider its possible participation in the capital funding of the bank. As stated in our previous correspondence, the bank through the mandate of its board and shareholders has been involved in series of preliminary engagements with several prospective investors including Milost, but the bank did not execute a binding definitive agreement with Milost Global Inc. It is therefore a misnomer for anyone to claim that the bank issued a false statement relative to the nature of the communication between Milost and the bank,” Unity Bank stated.

    The bank noted that the nomenclature “Commitment Letter” was apparently adopted by Milost in its communication to buttress its seriousness to proceed with the transactions subject to relevant compliance requirements.

    According to the bank, considering that Milost and the bank were only still engaged in preliminary discussions, which must necessarily be subjected to relevant regulatory, statutory and corporate governance compliance parameters before such discussions could become elevated to the level of a “binding commitment agreement” properly so called, the issue of “Termination” of the “Transaction” does not arise.

    “The bank is fully aware of all regulatory steps and requirements on such investment proposition and the imperative to comply with them, and will continue to engage all stakeholders on achievements made in this regard,” Unity Bank assured.

     

  • N500b recapitalisation for FMBN coming

    Federal Government said yesterday that it will inject N500 billion into the Federal Mortgage Bank of Nigeria (FMBN) for its recapitalisation.

    It added that the recapita-lisation would enable the bank to carry out its mandate under the national housing programme of the current administration.

    Minister of State for Power, Works and Housing, Mustapha Baba Sheuri, who spoke in Ilorin, the Kwara State capita at the commissioning of 250- unit housing estate of FMBN/Kam Abioye,  said the apex mortgage institution has a major role to play in the realisation of the aspiration of many Nigerians towards owning a home through mortgage.

    The minister, who put the housing deficit in the country between 16 and17 million units, added that government would continue to strive to meet the challenge of the deficit.

    He said the ministry planned to build several housing units in every state of the federation for public workers, every year, over the next three years under a public-private partnership (PPP) arrangement, adding that arrangement and implementation had reached an advanced stage.

  • NAICOM to insurers: provide financial status before recapitalisation

    NAICOM to insurers: provide financial status before recapitalisation

    The National Insurance Commission (NAICOM) has asked the 59 insurance firms in the country to report the capital needs of their businesses in a financial condition report in preparation for recapitalisation.

    The commission said it was necessary to determine regulatory capital that would be appropriate for the firms, which comprises Life, Non-Life and Composite, to hold sufficient capital to cover their risk and liabilities when they arise.

    Commissioner for Insurance, Mohammed Kari, in an interaction with reporters in Lagos said the commission expects the report from the firms while it prepares a guideline that would be released in due course.

    Kari said since the Minister of Finance, Mrs. Kemi Adeosun, made a statement at the last Insurance Industry Consultative Conference ( IICC), the Commission has been inundated with requests to clarify what she meant by her statement which read “would need to recapitalise.”

    He said: “But I ask, what is there to clarify? However, there is nothing to panic about. It is the expectation of any business to have adequate capital to meet its liabilities.

    “This is more so in insurance business that has a time frame for companies to settle their claims. We have quite a number of companies that have either eroded capital base or have miss-matched their assets or liabilities cover, mostly arising from wrong investment decisions. Our concern is for the firms to hold sufficient capital to cover their risks and liabilities when they arise at all times. This is very crucial in turbulent times like the ones we are currently going through.

    “While we are going to develop a full risk based capital framework, we will be expecting companies to initiate the appropriate capital adequacy reviews and have their actuary report the capital needs of their business in a financial condition report.

    “A guideline would be released in due course. It is important for all insurers and reinsurers to get used to voluntarily holding capital that would protect policy holders against adverse outcomes that could negatively affect their ability to meet their obligations. Those in the annuity business can easily relate to this statement because of their experience in 2015.”

  • Recapitalisation: Our stand, by operators

    Recapitalisation: Our stand, by operators

    Following last week’s criticism by the Federal Government of the insurance industry’s low penetration and contribution to the country’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and its readiness to support it, the operators have said they are ready to take steps to drive growth, reports Omobola Tolu-Kusimo.

    Can insurance operators  take a pill of their own medicine as risk managers and recapitalise and are they willing to take a lead on Nigeria’s financial sub-sector as it is in other developing and developed countries?

    Do they also have the capacity to adequately de-risk the economy, and are they willing to be creative, innovative and harness the opportunities that exist in an economy that has the largest market in Africa? Do they have what it takes to respond to the Federal Government’s call for action?

    These and more questions were raised by the government, experts and other stakeholders at the just- concluded three-day conference of the Insurance Industry Consultative Council (IICC) National Insurance Conference with the theme: ‘’Expanding national resources and infrastructure in challenging times”  in Abuja.

    For the first time in the history of insurance, the second edition was graced by top government officials. The Minister of Finance, Mrs. Kemi Adeosun and her Power, Works and Housing counterpart, Babatunde Raji Fashola, were among the dignitaries.

    The operators, including its regulatory body, the National Insurance Commission (NAICOM), called for action by the government against insurance low performance and contribution to the country’s Gross Domestic product (GDP).

     Govt.’s call for action

    Speaking  on ‘Repositioning the Nigeria insurance industry for growth; Government to enable development’, Mrs Adeosun said it would not be news that Nigeria’s economy is facing some of the toughest challenges in living memory.

    However, she said  the administration firmly believes that the economy has only one direction to move in and that is upwards as true change means doing things differently with the full expectation of different outcomes.

    She said the government’s commitment to rebuilding the country’s physical infrastructure must be matched by rebuilding our soft infrastructure and the enabling environment for business to thrive.

    She said a key element of the enabling environment is the de-risking provided by the insurance industry.

    According to NIA sources, Nigeria with a penetration of 0.3 per cent recorded total industry Gross Written Premium (GWP) of N350 billion in 2015. If we collectively set a seven-year target of achieving Africa’s average penetration of 3.5%, we can transform our industry into one with GWP of N4.5 trillion by 2023.

    She said: “To achieve this, the industry will have to grow at a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 44 per cent from 2017 to 2023. This is in no way an impossible target and in fact represents the type of ambitious objectives we need to set for ourselves as several sectors in Nigeria, including telecoms, banking and pensions’ management have been able to record such impressive growth through the collective support of all stakeholders. It is also consistent with the Change  m andate of President Muhammadu Buhari and insurance have no reason to be different.

    “During this summit, it is important that we dimension the industry in its different facets as this is a gathering of some of our most capable minds and tested hands. We also need to act urgently, as the development of the insurance industry will come with other attendant benefits that are critical for us to achieve the type of growth and change we want for our economy and for the large number of Nigerians who have been deprived of the financial stability, protection and business growth that developed insurance markets have provided for their citizens for centuries. All successful economies are characterised by a strong investment culture of which insurance plays a key role.

    “A developed and active insurance market will bring about increase in GDP, accumulation of long-term funds for infrastructural financing, job creation, improvement in standard of living. It will also share the cost of adverse events with the government and attract foreign investment into our country.We are currently underperforming and there is a need to immediately address the decline in the industry as it is lagging behind global and African peers.”

    She expressed concern that despite being the largest economy in Africa, insurance penetration rate, which is a measure of sector contribution to GDP is 0.3 per cent, one of the lowest in Africa.

    She pointed out that the African and global average insurance penetration rates are 3.5 per cent and 6.2 per cent.

    “Insurance density, a per capita measure is $10 in Nigeria compared to the Africa average of $61 and global average of $662. South Africa has insurance density of $925. Our low performance is a call to action, to which we must develop a robust response.

    “According to the outcome of the 2014 insurance summit,the underperformance of this industry is denying the economy of potential incremental annual GDP growth of as much as 1.5 per cent and access to as many as 70,000 new jobs. The sector should ideally be a strong driver of GDP growth by generating significant value-add. According to a study done by McKinsey for the 2014 Insurance summit, it is estimated that a marginal 3.3 per cent increase in insurance penetration can lead to an incremental 0.5 per cent growth in GDP.”

    The minister highlighted several other factors that also contribute to the underdevelopment of the industry as low awareness, poor distribution channels, and unhealthy competition.

    She said the government and operator’s immediate and collective next steps is to stimulate extra-ordinary growth and unleash the potential of the industry by carefully taking certain planned steps which is to recognise our true stage of development and strengthen the capital base of insurance companies.

    She recalled that in 1981, the minimum capital requirement for banks was N1 million while that of composite insurance companies was N0.8 million.

    By 2014, banks had grown theirs to N25 billion and composite insurance companies to five billion naira showing that banks had grown capital requirements eight times faster. The industry needs to recapitalise. Capital levels were last raised in 2007. To take true advantage of the opportunity for the industry we must recapitalise and reposition. The top three banks have capital in excess of N300 billion each! The top three insurers have capital of between N14 billion to N25 billion, she stated.

    On what the sector needs to do, she said the stakeholders need to raise minimum capital requirements in a manner that is comparative to what happened in banking in the last  three decades. Increased capital will provide funding for publicity and product development, she said.

    Mrs Adeosun said this would raise the clout of insurance companies in policy formulation and will enhance their capacity to hire the best people and deploy the technology and marketing, product awareness and investment needed to support the industry.

    On the role of NAICOM in the new path to growth, she said there must be enforcement of insurance regulation and solvency standards.

    She emphasised on the need to enforce the laws relating to compulsory insurance of vehicles, property among others.

    She said NAICOM must also strengthening industry and regulatory capacity

    By encouraging actuarial services, marketing and distribution in order to position the regulator as growth drivers and update the legal environment and removal of obstacles to the attraction of talent.

    Fashola  said the government is building infrastructure and will need a strong and capable insurance sector to insure them.

    He queried why the sector is not impacting on the lives of the majority of vulnerable people.

    ‘’Why is our sector not impacting in quantity in the lives of the majority of vulnerable people in the country.

    ‘’Every market man and woman in the country is selling recharge cards. These are areas that insurers need to design products that meets the need of the people,’’ he said.

  • Risk-based supervision may trigger recapitalisation

    Risk-based supervision may trigger recapitalisation

    Recapitalisation is imminent in the insurance industry as the supervisory authority, the National Insurance Commission (NAICOM), begins enforcement of risk-based supervision (RBS). Omobola Tolu-kusimo writes.

    The implementation of risk- based supervision (RBS) by the National Insurance Commission (NAICOM) is likely to result in recapitalisation of the insurance industry soon.

    RBS is a structured supervisory approach aimed at identifying the most critical risks that face each insurance company. The industry regulator, through a focused review, assesses each company’s management to identify risks and financial vulnerability.

    In other words, companies will be made to grow their capital according to the volume of their businesses. The higher the risk profile of the insurer, the higher the capital it must hold.

    RBS requires supervisors to assess whether an insurer’s governance, risk management and internal controls are adequate, and whether the solvency and liquidity of the insurer are sufficient to withstand unexpected shocks.

    Presently, the Commission is gradually implementing the RBS so as to achieve a seamless transition of the industry into the new system.

    NAICOM ‘s Director of Inspectorate, Barineka Thompson, said the Commission’s objective is to strengthen the risk management systems of insurers, allow for the identification of insurers’ strengths and weaknesses and identify areas where difficulties or challenges exist for the insurers.

    He said: “We intend to achieve a supervision system that is in accordance with international best practices, risk focused supervision; preventive control; promote appropriate regulatory action in line with the risk profile of an insurer; focus supervision resources more effectively and efficiently and have a more flexible regulation emphasising on principles rather than the rules.

    “The RBS will allow the systematic assessment of insurers’ risks using a formalised framework at regular intervals; encourage a strong risk management function in insurers; promote the cost-effective use of regulatory resources; and allow continuous monitoring, early warning indicators, prompt intervention and timely action.”

    In transiting to RBS, Kari pointed out that the Commission recognises the need to plan the transition carefully and appreciate the scope and depth of the initiative.

    “We recognise the main risks arising from doing the transition hastily and without proper planning. Adequate time and training is required to make the transition successful. RBS requires supervisors to exercise judgments that are more subjective than they may be accustomed to doing under compliance programmes, among others.

    “The standards and guidelines are the Code of good corporate governance–2009, Risk management guidelines–2012, RBS implementation roadmap to be revised from time to time; Implementation of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS)–2011/2012; RBS implementation framework–2014; Revised prudential guidelines for insurance institutions–July2015; Market conduct and business practice guidelines–July2015 and Preliminary study of different models–(concluded)

    “Best practice is that supervisors introduce RBS gradually and in tandem with their existing compliance approaches. This helps to minimise the supervisor’s own risk—the risk of ineffective supervision. The benefits of RBS to policyholders, the financial soundness of operators and general stability of the economic system is enormous.

    “Across jurisdictions there are emerging trends for insurers and brokers. Both the work being undertaken by the International Association of Insurance Supervisors (IAIS) and Europe’s Solvency II are driving much greater sophistication and risk-sensitivity in prudential supervision with the result that risk-based systems are gradually being introduced outside Europe. In an increasingly globalised market regulators are looking at what other jurisdictions are doing with the result that leading markets are broadly taking a similar approach to supervising insurers.”

    Meanwhile, operators in the industry are implementing the RBS framework and bracing up for the challenges that come with the initiative.

    Chairman, Consolidated Hallmark Insurance Plc, Obi Ekezie said a major plank of NAICOM’s intensified regulation is the risk based supervision. According to him, it is likely to result in a call for further injection of capital by operators soon.

    He stated that the new NAICOM helmsman, Kari, sent a strong warning to operators about the regulator’s preparedness to sanitise the system.

    The Chairman, Publicity and Communication Sub-Committee of the Insurer’s Committee, Oye Hassan-Odukale, said operators and the commission have agreed to transit to RBS model, adding that it will enable operators shore up their capital in line with the businesses they want to underwrite.

    “We had a lecture from NAICOM on RBS, which is where we are transiting to. With RBS, there would not be common capital base for insurance companies again. Companies have to determine their capital in line with the business they do.

    “The board of insurance companies would have the responsibility of determining the risk capital for their companies, which would be supported by the appropriate capital. This is new in Nigeria. Just like the International Financial Reporting Standard (IFRS), we are transiting to this new initiative and NAICOM is taking us through it so that we can move our capital structure to this base,” he said.