Tag: regional integration

  • A word of caution on regional integration

    A word of caution on regional integration

    • By Kunle Somorin

    In the sprawling landscape of Nigeria, a complex web of ethnic and regional organizations has evolved like a mutating organism, adapting to the country’s shifting political terrain. From the Yoruba’s Afenifere to the Igbo’s Ohanaeze Ndigbo, and from the North’s Arewa Consultative Forum to the Niger Delta’s Pan Niger Delta Forum, these groups have become a defining feature of Nigeria’s political architecture.

    Even in the governance ecosystem, various Governors’ and Parliamentary Forums and caucuses have all assumed regional focus, yet share a common goal of promoting economic growth and development. Their fragmented approach and duplicated efforts, I dare say, hinder progress and calls for concern. As they grow in influence, a pressing question looms: Will they fortify democracy and national cohesion, or fragment the nation further? The answer, much like Nigeria itself, remains a work in progress.

    The unfolding developments surrounding regional integration efforts within our nation warrant careful consideration. The media’s portrayal of these outcomes is equally intriguing; not only do they downplay national unity and cohesion, they also accentuate divisions along the lines of our diverse ‘tribes and tongues.’ This should serve as a red flag for conscientious members of society, as it may inadvertently embolden insurgents and separatists to intensify their balkanization agendas.

    Regional integration, however, is far from a misguided endeavour. When thoughtfully managed, it becomes a potent tool for economic growth, political stability, and social progress.

    By fostering cooperation and collaboration among neighboring states, regional integration creates larger markets, enhances economic competitiveness, and contributes to peace and stability. Consider the European Union (EU), a successful example of large-scale regional integration. The EU’s creation of a single market, allowing free movement of goods, services, and people, has led to increased trade and investment among member states. Moreover, it has fostered peace and stability across Europe, putting an end to centuries of conflict and forging a united and prosperous continent.

    Similarly, the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) stands as another testament to successful regional integration. ASEAN’s efforts have resulted in a vast market of over 600 million consumers, attracting foreign investment and driving economic development.

    Meanwhile, the African Union’s (AU) Agenda 2063 envisions a united and prosperous continent, emphasizing increased trade, investment, infrastructure development, and political cooperation among African nations.

    These instances underscore why we must not dismiss regional integration efforts. They promote economic diversification, innovation, and competitiveness. Within Nigeria—a nation brimming with diversity and untapped potential—lies an opportunity to harness the power of regional integration. By fostering cooperation and collaboration among our constituent states, we can unlock doors to enhanced economic growth, improved infrastructure, and greater national unity.

    The proliferation of regional organizations in Nigeria has, however, sparked intense debate about its implications for unity, progress, and good governance. While these groups have the potential to promote regional cohesion and development, they also risk perpetuating regionalism and fragmentation.

    On the one hand, regional organisations can amplify the voices of member states in national politics and negotiations, leading to more effective advocacy and representation. They can also facilitate cooperation and collaboration on regional projects, fostering economic development and social progress. Moreover, these groups can promote a sense of belonging and identity among member states, strengthening regional bonds and fostering a sense of shared purpose.

    On the other hand, the proliferation of regional organisations can reinforce divisions and perpetuate a sense of “we versus them”. This can lead to competition for scarce resources, exacerbating tensions and undermining national unity. Smaller regions may feel marginalized or underrepresented in regional blocs dominated by larger states, further aggravating inequalities. Moreover, regional interests may clash, leading to conflicts and undermining national unity.

    The socio-cultural organizations in Nigeria, such as Afenifere, Arewa Consultative Forum, Ohanaeze Ndigbo, and others, have both points of convergence and divergence. While they share common goals and objectives, they also have differing interests and approaches that can potentially threaten national unity and solidarity.

    On the one hand, these organizations converge on issues such as cultural preservation and promotion, regional development, and protection of regional interests. They also promote social justice and equality, and encourage regional cooperation and collaboration. These shared goals have the potential to foster national cohesion and unity, as they recognize and celebrate the diversity of Nigerian cultures.

    On the other hand, these organizations diverge on issues such as ethnic and regional biases, competing interests and agendas, and different political leanings and ideologies. These differences can lead to tensions and conflicts, potentially undermining national unity and solidarity. For instance, the pursuit of regional interests may lead to competition for resources and power, worsening existing tensions and conflicts.

    Moreover, these organizations can reinforce ethnic and regional stereotypes, creating divisions and mistrust among different groups. This can lead to a weakening of national identity and unity, potentially threatening the very fabric of the Nigerian nation.

    Read Also: Ondo, Ekiti to collaborate on regional integration

    However, it is important to note that these organizations also have the potential to promote national unity and solidarity. By fostering cultural understanding and exchange, encouraging dialogue and conflict resolution, and supporting marginalized or underrepresented groups, they can help build a more inclusive and equitable society.

    The various Governors’ Forums in Nigeria, comprising the Northern, South-East, South-South, South-West, North Central, North West, and North East Governors’ Forums, have exhibited both unified and fragmented agendas.

    The Northern and Southern Governors Forums in Nigeria have exhibited both convergence and divergence on various issues affecting the country. Despite their shared concerns, the forums have distinct approaches and priorities shaped by their regional perspectives.

    One point of convergence is the acknowledgment of security challenges. Both forums recognize the need for innovative and proactive responses to the country’s multidimensional security challenges, including terrorism, banditry, and kidnapping. This shared concern has led to collaborative efforts and joint statements on addressing security threats.

     Another area of convergence is the discussion on restructuring. The Southern Governors Forum has explicitly called for restructuring, while the Northern Governors Forum has also acknowledged the need for reforms. This indicates a shared understanding of the need to address the country’s structural deficiencies.

    However, the forums also exhibit divergence on specific issues. A notable example is open grazing, which the Southern Governors Forum banned, citing security and economic concerns. In contrast, the Northern Governors Forum had earlier banned open grazing in 2021 but with a more gradual approach.

    The approach to restructuring also differs between the two forums. The Southern Governors Forum is pushing for radical changes, including fiscal federalism and devolution of powers. In contrast, the Northern Governors Forum seems more cautious, emphasizing the need for gradual and incremental reforms.

    Furthermore, the forums have different regional priorities. The Southern Governors Forum focuses on issues like farmers-herders clashes, economic development, and infrastructure. In contrast, the Northern Governors Forum prioritizes challenges like Boko Haram insurgency, banditry, and poverty alleviation.

    The various Governors’ Forums in Nigeria, despite their regional focus, share a common goal of promoting economic growth and development. However, their fragmented approach and duplicated efforts hinder progress. To enhance collaboration and optimize resources, a unified approach is essential.

    Harmonizing their agendas and prioritizing shared national interests and regional concerns is crucial. A single, unified platform for all Governors’ Forums should suffice. NGF must wake from its slumber to streamline efforts, reduce costs, and optimize executive hours. Leveraging the existing structures of the National Economic Council (NEC) and the Nigerian Governors Forum (NGF) would facilitate coordination and collaboration among the regional forums.

    Regular joint meetings between the Governors’ Forums, NEC, and NGF would ensure alignment, synergy, and effective decision-making. Equal representation from each region on the unified platform would allow for diverse perspectives and inclusive decision-making. Open and transparent communication channels would avoid duplication of efforts and ensure cohesive progress.

    Pooling resources, expertise, and knowledge would enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of the unified platform. Flexibility within the platform would accommodate region-specific concerns and priorities. Regular review and assessment of the platform’s progress would make adjustments as needed to ensure continued effectiveness.

    A unified approach would enable the Governors’ Forums to enhance collaboration, optimize resources, strengthen regional and national cohesion, address shared challenges more effectively, and promote economic growth and development. By working together, they can drive progress and prosperity for Nigeria.

    For instance, the Northern Governors Forum has addressed security concerns and economic development, while the South-East Governors Forum has promoted regional economic initiatives. Similarly, the South-South Governors Forum has focused on regional development, and the South-West Governors Forum has emphasized regional integration. All these forums have demonstrated unity and cooperation on regional issues, fostering a sense of solidarity and shared purpose.

    To overlook how these forums have also displayed fragmented agendas, reflecting the diverse interests and priorities of their respective regions is a no brainer. While the Northern Governors Forum has prioritized issues like Boko Haram insurgency and cattle rustling, the South-East Governors Forum is talking about economic development and infrastructure projects. The South-South Governors Forum’s emphasis is on environmental issues and resource control, whereas the South-West Governors Forum has prioritized security and social infrastructure and economic development with their DAWN Commission. The North East Governors have also gained a chunk of the nation’s commonwealth with the establishment of the North East Development Commission like their Niger Delta Development Commission. No wonder other sub-regions are pushing for Federal Government-funded agencies peculiar to their circumstances, too. The worrisome trend is for people to capitalize on crises to access the national treasury.

    These forums have sometimes taken differing stances on national issues, revealing their fragmented nature. For example, the Northern Governors Forum has surreptitiously opposed the Southern Governors Forum’s call for restructuring, state police and VAT.

    One pivotal aspect of regional integration involves promoting zonal economic development initiatives. Encouraging economic cooperation and resource sharing among states within the same geopolitical zone allows for leveraging each region’s comparative advantages, creating a more robust and diversified economy.

    Inter-state trade and investment play equally crucial roles. By promoting these exchanges, Nigeria can create new avenues for economic growth, job creation, and innovation.

    Furthermore, investing in regional infrastructure—such as transportation networks, energy grids, and communication systems—is essential. These networks facilitate the seamless movement of goods, services, and ideas across our vast country. South West Governors are already contemplating a regional train network to bolster the transportation of goods and services and ease human movement.

    Cultural exchange programmes, too, contribute significantly to regional integration. By fostering understanding and appreciation among Nigeria’s diverse ethnic and linguistic groups, we celebrate our rich heritage and promote national unity.

    Lastly, regional security cooperation remains most crucial. Enhancing security collaboration and intelligence sharing among states enables us to address longstanding security challenges more effectively. The multifaceted benefits of regional integration within Nigeria include not only economic growth and development but also increased trade opportunities, improved infrastructure, and heightened security and stability.

    Despite their commendable intentions, the Northern and Southern Governors’ forums have yet to fully unlock the potential of regional integration. Critical missing ingredients in their efforts are effective collaboration and trust, resulting in insufficient economic cooperation, strategic infrastructure development, cultural exchange, and a unified security approach. To address these limitations, the forums must cultivate genuine trust and cooperation, transcending political affiliations and regional biases.

    Achieving this requires several strategic steps.

    First, the forums should develop a unified economic agenda that actively promotes inter-regional trade and investment. By fostering economic ties, they can stimulate growth, create jobs, and alleviate poverty.

    Second, strategic infrastructure investments are essential. Enhancing connectivity through well-planned infrastructure projects will improve transportation, energy distribution, and communication networks, ultimately enhancing citizens’ quality of life.

    Third, cultural exchange programmes should celebrate Nigeria’s rich diversity while promoting understanding. By appreciating each other’s traditions, languages, and customs, citizens can forge stronger bonds and a shared sense of identity.

    Fourth, the establishment of a collective security framework is paramount. Sharing intelligence and resources will enable a coordinated response to security challenges such as insurgency, separatism, banditry, and kidnapping. By pooling their strengths, the forums can ensure the safety and security of all citizens.

    Beyond these immediate concerns, regional integration can address broader societal issues. Economic growth, unemployment, healthcare, education, food security, and environmental challenges all fall within its purview. By prioritizing these areas, the forums can create a more resilient and prosperous nation.

    However, we must also heed the lessons of Nigeria’s past. The First Republic’s experiment with regionalism, while well-intentioned, led to political and economic imbalances. Regional identities often overshadowed national unity, resulting in uneven development and resource distribution.

    To rekindle regionalism today, we must tread carefully. While it could reduce governance costs and emphasize unity, we should adopt a hybrid approach. A federal system with a robust central authority and devolved powers to regions can ensure equitable resource distribution and development. Simultaneously, promoting national identity through education and cultural exchange will bridge regional divides, fostering a shared sense of citizenship.

    As our esteemed governors and lawmakers convene in their respective regional forums, a poignant question arises: What becomes of the national interest amidst the pursuit of disparate agendas? The Nigerian Governors Forum, originally established to foster unity and cooperation, now appears to have given way to regionalism. Inside our National Assembly and State Assemblies exist the North, South, and various sub-regional caucuses prioritizing their own interests, creating a fragmented landscape where the nation’s collective well-being hangs in the balance.

    While regional agendas hold importance, they must not supersede the national interest. It is incumbent upon our governors and lawmakers to ensure that parochial concerns do not eclipse the greater good.

    The mutation of regional blocs is also replicated in socio-cultural groups that are politically irrefutably more politically volatile than political parties.

    A plethora of them in self-denial claim to be socio-cultural organisations, including Afenifere, Arewa Consultative Forum, and Ohanaeze Ndigbo, Mbatse in Nasarawa/Plateau axis,  Egbesu or Ijaw National Congress in Rivers and Bayelsa, Middle Belt Forum crisscrossing the North Central to North-East geo-political zones, and Northern Elders Forum, among others coexisting in a delicate balance of unity and diversity.

    While sharing common parochial objectives, they also harbour divergent interests and approaches that potentially imperil national cohesion. Convergence points include cultural preservation, regional development, and social justice, fostering national unity through celebration of diverse cultures, they have ethnic and regional biases, competing interests, and ideological differences creating tension and conflict, threatening national solidarity. These organizations walk a tightrope between reinforcing stereotypes and promoting understanding, with the potential to either weaken or strengthen national identity and unity.

    Therefore, it is expedient that our leaders transcend regional boundaries and converge on a shared vision for Nigeria’s prosperity. Let us not forget that our strength lies in unity, and our progress is inexorably linked to our ability to work together toward a common goal. Beyond regional interests, we must embrace a national ethos—one that prioritizes the welfare of all Nigerians, regardless of geography or ethnicity. Our governors’ leadership should not solely benefit their respective regions; it must advance our beloved country, Nigeria.

    Clearly, the proposals for a unified platform and harmonized approach among the regional Forums in Nigeria will receive varied reactions from heads and beneficiaries. The Northern Governors Forum may initially resist the idea, fearing loss of autonomy and control. They may express concerns about southern states dominating the unified platform, but eventually accept the proposal if guaranteed equal representation and influence. In contrast, the Southern Governors Forum is likely to welcome the idea of a unified platform, expecting greater collaboration and resource sharing. However, they may also push for greater control and influence in the platform.

    The National Economic Council (NEC) is expected to support harmonization and a unified platform, offering technical assistance and resources to facilitate coordinated economic development strategies. The Nigerian Governors Forum (NGF) will likely endorse the unified platform, expecting more effective problem-solving and resource utilization, and potentially taking on a leadership role.

    State Governors may have mixed reactions, depending on individual interests and political affiliations. Some may resist ceding control, while others will welcome coordinated efforts. However, I am certain they will eventually accept the proposal if convinced of the benefits and equal representation.

    Civil Society Organizations will welcome the unified platform, hoping for increased transparency and accountability. They expect greater engagement and participation in decision-making processes. Regional beneficiaries may initially be skeptical, fearing loss of regional identity and benefits. However, they will eventually accept the proposal if convinced of the unified platform’s benefits and equal representation.

    The Federal Government is likely to support the unified platform, seeing it as a tool for enhanced national cohesion and development. They may offer incentives and resources to encourage harmonization. Together, it is my considered opinion that a better Nigeri will be forged where regional interests complement, rather than conflict with, the national interest. To achieve the noble goal of unity and progress, a series of measures must be taken. First, a National Unity Summit must be convened, bringing together all governors, regional leaders, and key stakeholders to reaffirm their commitment to the national interest and align their agendas with the country’s overarching vision.

    This historic gathering will serve as a powerful call to unity and a testament to the strength of collective action. Perhaps this summit could be a veritable platform to get a “People’s Constitution” that could be tabled before the National Assembly for consideration to replace the military-inspired one that has been described as confusing, incoherent and anti-people.

    Next, a Presidential Council for National Integration must be established, comprising representatives from each region, chaired by the President, to facilitate regular dialogue, address regional concerns, and promote collective problem-solving. This council will serve as a beacon of hope, guiding the nation. The National Orientation Agency (NOA) has proven to be too little to handle the monster and midwife our quest to transit from being a mere political expression to true nationhood.

    The President must also clearly define and communicate national priorities, ensuring they align with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and Nigeria’s Vision 2050. This will provide a guiding light for governors and lawmakers to align their regional agendas with national objectives, fostering a sense of purpose and direction.

    Inter-regional collaboration must, no doubt, be encouraged, incentivizing joint projects and initiatives among regions, fostering cooperation and knowledge sharing. This will help build trust and promote a sense of shared ownership in the Nigerian Project, national progress, as all governors and lawmakers claim to work together towards a common goal.

    The Nigerian Governors Forum must also be strengthened, revitalized as a platform for governors to engage in constructive dialogue, share best practices, and align their efforts with national priorities. This will provide a foundation for unity and a testament to the power of collective action. Inclusive decision-making must be fostered, ensuring that regional agendas are informed by diverse perspectives, including those of civil society organizations, the private sector, and citizens.

    This will guarantee that the national interest remains paramount, as decisions are made with the greater good in mind.

    Finally, the President must lead by example, demonstrating a commitment to national unity and progress, and encouraging governors and lawmakers to follow suit. The President’s leadership and vision will inspire a culture of collaboration and convergence, as the nation moves forward in unity and strength.

    While these disparate socio-cultural organizations and regional political blocs are not bad in themselves, they are a double-edged sword. While they have the potential to promote national unity and solidarity, they also risk reinforcing divisions and undermining national cohesion. To maximize their benefits, they must prioritize inclusivity, dialogue, and national cohesion, recognizing and celebrating the diversity of Nigerian cultures while working towards a more united and solidary nation.

    The President’s leadership is crucial in reining in divergence and fostering convergence of agendas, in a manner that would lead to a brighter future for all.

    •  Somorin is a doctoral researcher at Crescent University, Abeokuta, Ogun State.
  • A word of caution on regional integration

    A word of caution on regional integration

    • By Kunle Somorin

    In the sprawling landscape of Nigeria, a complex web of ethnic and regional organizations has evolved like a mutating organism, adapting to the country’s shifting political terrain. From the Yoruba’s Afenifere to the Igbo’s Ohanaeze Ndigbo, and from the North’s Arewa Consultative Forum to the Niger Delta’s Pan Niger Delta Forum, these groups have become a defining feature of Nigeria’s political architecture.

    Even in the governance ecosystem, various governors’ and parliamentary forums and caucuses have all assumed regional focus, yet share a common goal of promoting economic growth and development. Their fragmented approach and duplicated efforts, I dare say, hinder progress and calls for concern. As they grow in influence, a pressing question looms: Will they fortify democracy and national cohesion, or fragment the nation further? The answer, much like Nigeria itself, remains a work in progress.

    The unfolding developments surrounding regional integration efforts within our nation warrant careful consideration. The media’s portrayal of these outcomes is equally intriguing; not only do they downplay national unity and cohesion, they also accentuate divisions along the lines of our diverse ‘tribes and tongues.’ This should serve as a red flag for conscientious members of society, as it may inadvertently embolden insurgents and separatists to intensify their balkanization agendas.

    Regional integration, however, is far from a misguided endeavour. When thoughtfully managed, it becomes a potent tool for economic growth, political stability, and social progress.

    By fostering cooperation and collaboration among neighbouring states, regional integration creates larger markets, enhances economic competitiveness, and contributes to peace and stability. Consider the European Union (EU), a successful example of large-scale regional integration. The EU’s creation of a single market, allowing free movement of goods, services, and people, has led to increased trade and investment among member states. Moreover, it has fostered peace and stability across Europe, putting an end to centuries of conflict and forging a united and prosperous continent.

    Similarly, the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) stands as another testament to successful regional integration. ASEAN’s efforts have resulted in a vast market of over 600 million consumers, attracting foreign investment and driving economic development.

    Meanwhile, the African Union’s (AU) Agenda 2063 envisions a united and prosperous continent, emphasizing increased trade, investment, infrastructure development, and political cooperation among African nations.

    Read Also: Odeleke cautions pastors on taking church matters to court

    These instances underscore why we must not dismiss regional integration efforts.

    The proliferation of regional organizations in Nigeria has, however, sparked intense debate about its implications for unity, progress, and good governance. While these groups have the potential to promote regional cohesion and development, they also risk perpetuating regionalism and fragmentation.

    The socio-cultural organizations in Nigeria, such as Afenifere, Arewa Consultative Forum, Ohanaeze Ndigbo, and others, have both points of convergence and divergence. While they share common goals and objectives, they also have differing interests and approaches that can potentially threaten national unity and solidarity.

    On the one hand, these organizations converge on issues such as cultural preservation and promotion, regional development, and protection of regional interests. They also promote social justice and equality, and encourage regional cooperation and collaboration. These shared goals have the potential to foster national cohesion and unity, as they recognize and celebrate the diversity of Nigerian cultures.

    On the other hand, these organizations diverge on issues such as ethnic and regional biases, competing interests and agendas, and different political leanings and ideologies. These differences can lead to tensions and conflicts, potentially undermining national unity and solidarity. For instance, the pursuit of regional interests may lead to competition for resources and power, worsening existing tensions and conflicts.

    Moreover, these organizations can reinforce ethnic and regional stereotypes, creating divisions and mistrust among different groups. This can lead to a weakening of national identity and unity, potentially threatening the very fabric of the Nigerian nation.

    The various Governors’ Forums in Nigeria, comprising the Northern, Southeast, South-south, Southwest, North-central, Northwest, and Northeast Governors’ Forums, have exhibited both unified and fragmented agendas.

    The Northern and Southern Governors Forums in Nigeria have exhibited both convergence and divergence on various issues affecting the country. Despite their shared concerns, the forums have distinct approaches and priorities shaped by their regional perspectives.

    One point of convergence is the acknowledgment of security challenges. Both forums recognize the need for innovative and proactive responses to the country’s multidimensional security challenges, including terrorism, banditry, and kidnapping. This shared concern has led to collaborative efforts and joint statements on addressing security threats.

    Another area of convergence is the discussion on restructuring. The Southern Governors Forum has explicitly called for restructuring, while the Northern Governors Forum has also acknowledged the need for reforms. This indicates a shared understanding of the need to address the country’s structural deficiencies.

    However, the forums also exhibit divergence on specific issues. A notable example is open grazing, which the Southern Governors Forum banned, citing security and economic concerns. In contrast, the Northern Governors Forum had earlier banned open grazing in 2021 but with a more gradual approach.

    The approach to restructuring also differs between the two forums. The Southern Governors Forum is pushing for radical changes, including fiscal federalism and devolution of powers. In contrast, the Northern Governors Forum seems more cautious, emphasizing the need for gradual and incremental reforms.

    Furthermore, the forums have different regional priorities. The Southern Governors Forum focuses on issues like farmers-herders clashes, economic development, and infrastructure. In contrast, the Northern Governors Forum prioritizes challenges like Boko Haram insurgency, banditry, and poverty alleviation.

    The various Governors’ Forums in Nigeria, despite their regional focus, share a common goal of promoting economic growth and development. However, their fragmented approach and duplicated efforts hinder progress. To enhance collaboration and optimize resources, a unified approach is essential.

    Despite their commendable intentions, the Northern and Southern Governors’ forums have yet to fully unlock the potential of regional integration. Critical missing ingredients in their efforts are effective collaboration and trust, resulting in insufficient economic cooperation, strategic infrastructure development, cultural exchange, and a unified security approach. To address these limitations, the forums must cultivate genuine trust and cooperation, transcending political affiliations and regional biases.

    As our esteemed governors and lawmakers convene in their respective regional forums, a poignant question arises: What becomes of the national interest amidst the pursuit of disparate agendas? The Nigerian Governors Forum, originally established to foster unity and cooperation, now appears to have given way to regionalism. Inside our National Assembly and State Assemblies exist the North, South, and various sub-regional caucuses prioritizing their own interests, creating a fragmented landscape where the nation’s collective well-being hangs in the balance.

    While regional agendas hold importance, they must not supersede the national interest. It is incumbent upon our governors and lawmakers to ensure that parochial concerns do not eclipse the greater good.

    Inter-regional collaboration must, no doubt, be encouraged, incentivizing joint projects and initiatives among regions, fostering cooperation and knowledge sharing. This will help build trust and promote a sense of shared ownership in the Nigerian Project, national progress, as all governors and lawmakers claim to work together towards a common goal.

    The Nigerian Governors Forum must also be strengthened, revitalized as a platform for governors to engage in constructive dialogue, share best practices, and align their efforts with national priorities. This will provide a foundation for unity and a testament to the power of collective action. Inclusive decision-making must be fostered, ensuring that regional agendas are informed by diverse perspectives, including those of civil society organizations, the private sector, and citizens.

    This will guarantee that the national interest remains paramount, as decisions are made with the greater good in mind.

    • Somorin is a doctoral researcher at Crescent University, Abeokuta.
  • Fayemi to S’ West Leaders: Put aside party politics for regional integration

    Mr. Kayode Fayemi, has urged Southwest leaders to jettison party politics in the interest of the region for sustainable development.

    Fayemi said the region can only regain its pride of place in the country’s political configuration unless leaders never allow national politics to divide them.

    He stated that all efforts must be geared by the leaders irrespective of political affinity towards the development of South West region.

    He added that for desirous interest of Yoruba to be promoted and protected, there must be unity of purpose and togetherness.

    Fayemi, who spoke yesterday at a national retreat held by Afenifere Renewal Group (ARG), disclosed that the All Progressives Congress governors in the southwest will work with the governor- elect in Oyo State, Mr. Seyi Makinde, in the interest of the region.

    The governor, however, said Yoruba race needs to be more tactical if it desires to actualise its advocacy issue of restructuring.

    He urged the proponents of the policy in the region to change strategy and reach out to other regions on how to actualise the dream of Nigeria being restructured economically and politically.

    Expressing regret over voter apathy in the southwest,  Fayemi said: “In the last presidential poll,  Ekiti registered 909,000 voters, only 381,000 voted; 0sun 1.67million registered, only 737,000 voted; Ondo, 1.8m registered , 586,000 voted; Oyo, 2.7m registered , 891,000 voted, 2.36m registered  in Ogun, 605,000 voted and Lagos with 6.3m, only 1.56m voted.

    “This might be caused by deficit of trust or fraudulent multiple registration, but whatever the case was, as long as we remain a constituent part of this country, ARG should reflect on this and act appropriately.

    “If it was as a result of deficit of voter education, then the ARG and governments need a lot to do. Religion also affected us, because some people were brainwashed to vote based on religious considerations.”

    The governors of Ondo, Rotimi Akeredolu and Osun, Gboyega Oyetola, said all the distinguishable traits of the southwest region initiated during the old western region must he brought back in the interest of the zone.

    Governor of Osun State, Mr. Gboyega Oyetola, said what could be regarded as distinguishable attributes of the Yoruba people is the quest for development and good governance and that these should be sustained in the interest of the people.

    Oyetola, represented by his chief of staff, Dr. Charles Akinola, said: “the Yorubaness in us and those things that separated us from others are our developmental drives, our intellectual rigour, our brilliance, circumspection and those values however, have not really taken us to where we deserve.”

    Oyetola also appealed to the southwest governments to leverage on its human capital in the diaspora and bring them home for the benefit of all.

    Also speaking, Ondo State governor, Arakunrin Rotimi Akeredolu, represented by the Commissioner for Regional Integration, Prof Bayonle Ademodi, added that the southwest is also facing serious economic and political crises that needed to be addressed.

    “We have to be really worried that the instability and insecurity in the Sahel has started affecting us and we need to get worried.

    “We knew we had to think outside the box in the southwest on how to bring our own paradigm and we thought of Development Agenda for Western Nigeria (DAWN) to work on how to put us back on the right track.”

    Akeredolu said the act of using desperation to get into power is becoming high in the region, saying this has made it difficult for people to have control over their leaders.

    The national chairman of the group, Hon Wale Oshun, reiterated the issue of restructuring and advised that it should be taken back to the front burner to benefit the Yoruba race.

    Oshun said in spite of different decisions taken by the southwest in the last elections, the values of the Yoruba people remain the same.

  • Afreximbank, Development Bank sign pact on regional integration

    The African Export-Import Bank (Afreximbank) and the Development Bank of Central African  States  (BDEAC) have entered into a memorandum of understanding (MOU) to harmonise their efforts in the promotion of trade and regional integration.

    Afreximbank President, Benedict Oramah, who spoke during the signing of the MOU at the Bank’s Cairo headquarters on Tuesday, said the two institutions would collaborate in the identification, preparation and financing of projects and trade transactions in African states that are members of both entities.

    Through co-financing, knowledge-sharing and capacity-building work, Afreximbank and BDEAC, he said, will join efforts to intensify industrialisation, expand exports and promote intra-regional trade across countries of the Economic and Monetary Community of Central Africa (CEMAC).

    BDEAC President, Fortunato-Ofa Mbo Nchama, said his institution’s decision to partner Afreximbank was based on the strong alignment that existed between the strategic objectives of the two entities.

    He said the collaboration would contribute to BDEAC’s work in supporting the structural transformation and diversification of Central African economies through the construction of logistics infrastructure and industrial capacities and through the development of agro-processing and other key economic sectors, noting that those economies were still heavily dependent on commodity exports,

    BDEAC is a public regional bank established in 1975 to promote the development and economic integration of CEMAC countries. The members are Cameroon, Republic of Congo, Chad, Central African Republic, Equatorial Guinea and Gabon.

  • Southeast to replicate DAWN Commission for regional integration

    The Southeast has concluded plans to replicate the idea of the Development Agenda for Western Nigeria (DAWN) Commission, it was learnt yesterday.

    The Director General of the Southeast Governors’ Forum, Prof. Simon Ortuanya, addressed reporters yesterday after a two-day visit to the Cocoa House, Ibadan headquarters of the commission.

    He said the region wanted to take a step forward by replicating what the DAWN Commission was doing for Southwest.

    The director general said the visit helped his team to tap the experience for stepping up the region’s economic integration and development efforts.

    Ortuanya added that the visit also helped his team to envision a strategic plan and identify the professionals needed to manage the proposed agency successfully.

    According to him, the forum’s secretariat and DAWN Commission share some things in common, given their mandate for regional cohesion and integration. The director general said DAWN Commission was a success, having established its footprints in several areas of cooperation among the six states in the Southwest.

    He said: “We are barely one month old, whereas DAWN Commission is four years old. We felt we should have this interaction with DAWN with a view to leveraging on its experience. Going forward, this will help us. What drives the society now is economic empowerment. If we have empowerment in Southeast, it will also help Nigeria’s development.

    “DAWN developed a strategic master plan for the development of the Southwest. We also need to go this way in sustaining our values of hard work, innovation, honesty, respect and cooperation, among others. If the regions are able to sustain themselves, then they will rely less on the centre.

    “We have seen the DAWN’s strategic document, tagged: One Bloc. This will form the policy guidelines for the Southeast Governors’ Forum. We have also seen the type of young professionals driving this vision. We have learnt from all these and more through this visit.

    “We thank the DAWN Commission for opening its doors to us. We strongly believe that the future of Nigeria depends on cooperation.”

    DAWN Commission’s Acting Director General, Mr Seye Oyeleye, described the visit as a good step in the right direction.

    He said: “It is good that other regions are coming to embrace this approach to development. We need to de-emphasise ‘statism’ and encourage regionalisation for the obvious advantages therein. The visit was refreshing. They have discovered that there is no magic to what we are doing to fast-track growth and development. I am glad they have a lot of opportunities in the Southeast. The moment they make their own commission work, development will move fast.”

  • NDDC and the politics of regional integration

    NDDC and the politics of regional integration

    When the Niger Delta Masterplan was launched in 2007 by the then outgoing government of President Olusegun Obasanjo, it was meant to fast- track the development of the region, with a view to encouraging regional integration. Ten years after however, the dream appears far from being realised.
    Chairman of the Niger Delta Development Commission, (NDDC), Senator Victor Ndoma-Egba,(SAN), believes that now is the time to either come up with a new masterplan, or upgrade or review the old one launched by Obasanjo, if the agency must stop being seen as a competitor to the states in the region, in terms provision of infrastructures.
    Ndoma-Egba believes that the current approach to the NDDC’s budget, where states and host communities have no inputs into the policies and programmes of the agency would never bring development to the region, adding that instead it would perpetually put the NDDC in competition with states and local governments, a development, he noted, would be a “monumental distraction.”
    Rather than continue with the avoidable “distraction,” Ndoma-Egba, is advocating for the creation of a regional economy, with” identified drivers” that would be “youth friendly,” saying that “a motivated, educated and empowered youth remain the real resource of any nation, not oil or mineral resources.”
    He further said that an “ill motivated, uneducated and underpowered youth, on the other hand,” would be a “curse and danger to the nation. We therefore have a sacred responsibility to make our youth a real resource and a blessing to our region and country.”
    Drawing inspiration from the Act establishing the NDDC, especially section 7 (1) (b), which mandates the commission, to ‘conceive, plan and implement, in accordance with set rules and regulations, projects and programmes for the sustainable development of the Niger Delta area in the field of transportation including roads, jetties, waterways, health, education, employment industrialization, agriculture and fisheries, housing and urban development, water supply, electricity and telecommunications,’ the NDDC chairman, further said the “Act therefore envisages a diversified but integrated regional economy for the region.”
    And to him, endeavours like ICT, sports, the creative industry; agriculture and manufacturing supported by inter modal transportation, health, and education infrastructure, with adequate power supply, are largely youth friendly, which would help take the youths out of the streets, and engage them in productive ventures, which in the long run would make vandalisation of oil installations less attractive to the youths in the region.
    To him, infrastructure should be such that, it would link the region and facilitate commerce within the Niger Delta, while involving all and every stakeholder in the activities of the Commission, so as to give them sense of belonging, as well as make them own the projects.
    “We must encourage sustainable partnerships with all stakeholders and partners for the overall development, security and peace of the region. We will work to earn the confidence of stakeholders and partners. We do not demand or request their confidence; we will earn it through our honest work and single minded focus. To demonstrate our commitment, to achieve this, this board at its inaugural meeting created its committee on Partnerships for Sustainable Development. This is to underscore our determination to optimize these partnerships”, Ndoma-Egba, added.
    He was also oblivious of the fact that all the lofty objectives the commission set out to achieve would not be possible in an atmosphere of violence. To this end, he appealed to all militant groups in the region to stop violence and vandalisation of oil facilities in the area, saying the region could not be complaining of environmental pollution and at the same time being responsible for the spate of environmental degradation in the area, occasioned by vandalisation of oil installations.
    While insisting that the militant groups’ point of absence of development in the region has long been made, Ndoma-Egba believes strongly that, it was now time for the militant groups too to give peace a chance and allow the region to develop.
    “We need security and peace in the region. I had in my remarks at our inaugural board meeting posited that ‘we cannot complain about environmental pollution and degradation in the region and at the same time engage in activities like pipeline vandalisation and breaches that not only pollute and degrade the environment but also shield those who should bear responsibility for the sorry state of our environment from liability. All of us from the region must take responsibility for peace and security in our own interest and the interest of generations to come. All of us must be committed to the peace, security and prosperity of our region. It is our duty. ‘
    “I will continue to appeal to all militant groups to stop the breaches and vandalisation of oil facilities. Their point has long been made. Now they are inflicting injuries and suffering on themselves and our already hapless and helpless people. They should give us a chance to develop. We will continue to collaborate with the various security agencies to ensure peace in the region. We can only develop in a peaceful atmosphere and environment, “Ndoma-Egba, declared.

  • Amosun: Southwest regional integration necessary

    Amosun: Southwest regional integration necessary

    Ogun State Governor Ibikunle Amosun yesterday said Southwest regional integration was necessary for the region to develop.
    He said the Development Agenda for Western Nigeria (DAWN) has offered another opportunity for the region to offer direction that could lead to its socio-economic development.
    The governor spoke at the 2017 edition of the Southwest Governance Innovations Conference in Abeokuta, the state capital, aimed at charting a road map for quality governance and service delivery in Southwest states.
    The Conference with the theme: “Innovative Governance and Effective Service Delivery”, was organised by DAWN in partnership with Department for International Development (DFID) and PERL, with scores of participants from the private sector, heads of service and commissioners.
    Those who spoke include the Chief Executive Officer of Proshare Nigeria Limited, Dr. Olufemi Awoyemi, Dr. Dayo Adelogu, Ogun State Commissioner for Urban and Regional Planning, Mrs. Ronke Sokefun, Director of Justice Development and Peace Commission (JDPC), Ijebu – Ode, Rev. Patrick Ngoye, Ogun State Commissioner for Commerce and Industry Bimbo Ashiru and Mrs Olubunmi Fadairo.
    Amosun, who was represented by Deputy Governor Yetunde Onanuga, called for the “harnessing and pooling together” of the strength and comparative advantages of each part for the overall development of the region.
    “Providence has been so good to us that the region belongs to O’odua family. This means we share a long history of relationship that cuts across sphere of culture which amongst other include language and religion.
    “A geographical contiguity also makes it easier; this allows for easier cooperation. We should, therefore, take advantage of all these opportunities to create a united front to drive the process of the development of the region,” he said.
    He, however, warned that the development envisaged for the region through the DAWN won’t just happen if the civil service in the states do not key into the agenda.
    Awoyemi blamed the nation’s slow development on lack of innovations.
    He said for Nigeria to move forward, it must separate good innovations from routine governance, whereby “successive government dropped good innovations by their predecessors.”

     

  • Southwest governors restate commitment to regional integration

    Southwest governors restate commitment to regional integration

    Governors of Southwest states have agreed to collaborate on regional development.
    To actualise this, they set up a Regional Technical Working Group (TWG) on Integrated Infrastructural Development to incorporate multimodal transportation system.
    The governors also approved the report of the workshop on security, law and order in the Southwest hosted by Lagos State.
    These are part of the decisions at a meeting of the governors hosted by Ekiti State Governor Ayodele Fayose at the Government House, Ayoba Hill, Ado Ekiti, the State capital.
    It was attended by Governors Akinwumi Ambode (Lagos), Abiola Ajimobi (Oyo), Rauf Aregbesola (Osun) and Olusegun Mimiko (Ondo). Ogun State Governor Ibikunle Amosun was represented by the Deputy Governor, Mrs. Yetunde Onanuga.
    Fayose, who read the communique, said the Technical Working Group would work on multi-modal transportation system such as highways, rail, water and air, as well as integration on energy and power, digital and telecoms and leisure and entertainment.
    He added that the governors further agreed that Odua Investment Group should serve as a special purpose vehicle to drive the regional economic integration mission, while the Development Agenda for Western Nigeria (DAWN) Commission would be supported to achieve the objectives of its establishment.
    He added: “It was agreed that a Committee should be set up on Federal Government allocations in agriculture to be accessed for regional benefit.
    “An expanded Committee to be set up to make consultations, give consideration and set objectives on the regional direction with regards to the Federal budget on its implementation especially on agriculture with emphasis on irrigation and storage.”
    The governors resolved to strengthen the economic relations in the region.
    They adopted a policy for the pursuit of common educational, security and agricultural policies for the zone.
    According to the communique, the governors also said it is expedient for the zone to exchange notes in the area of security through convergence of security chiefs and other intelligence institutions to manage  the aerial, land and waterway security architecture of the zone.
    They also stated their commitment to a convergence of Commissioners of Police of the states of Western Nigeria and Intelligence Institutions to meet regularly and compare notes and work together in the region to work together to manage aerial, land and waterways security in the region.
    “The governors unanimous in addressing the declining moral standards and put in place structures to manage the loss of values and virtues in the society. A first step is a quality assurance and morality framework as a critical part of regional education.
    “One centre each is to be donated by the governments of the states of western Nigeria as Regional Centre of Excellence,” he said.
    Fayose said the governors also adopted the Southwest Regional Integrated Commercial Agriculture Development Programme (RICARD), with Lagos to champion a structured regional food exchange programme.
    “We also approve the report of the sports development strategic plan of action for Southwest Nigeria. Lagos was carefully chosen to host DAWN Inter-Collegiate Games to strengthen the bonds and competitiveness among the youth in the region.
    “States were also mandated to design modalities to key into the proposed rail project as a primary driver of inter-modal transportation system for the whole region”.
    The next meeting will hold in Ogun State in April.

  • Gas pipeline project by Nigeria, Morocco to boost regional integration

    Gas pipeline project by Nigeria, Morocco to boost regional integration

    •Both countries sign 21 bilateral agreements

    To foster economic integration in the continent, Nigeria and the Kingdom of Morocco yesterday agreed to facilitate a gas pipeline project that would connect Nigeria’s gas resources with those of other countries.
    The Minister of Foreign Affairs, Dr Geoffrey Onyema, disclosed this yesterday while presenting communiqué before the visiting Moroccan King Mohammed VI and President Muhammadu Buhari at the State House, Abuja.
    He said that the gas pipeline project will accelerate energy and electrification projects across the affected member countries.
    He said: “It is a great honour and privilege to read for you a communique which outlines the strategic visions that you both have for our two countries.
    “On the occasion of the visit of His Majesty King Mohammed VI to Nigeria, and following the discussion with President Muhammadu Buhari in Marrackech, on the sidelines of the Conference of the Parties (COP-22), and also in Abuja, the Kingdom of Morocco and the Federal Republic of Nigeria decided to study and take concrete steps toward the promotion of a regional gas pipeline project that will connect Nigeria’s gas resources, those of several West African countries and Morocco.”
    The gas pipeline project, he said, would be designed with the participation of all stakeholders with a view to creating a competitive regional electricity market with the potential to be connected to the European energy markets.
    He also disclosed that Nigeria and Kingdom of Morocco agreed to develop integrated industrial clusters in the sub-region in sectors such as manufacturing, Agro-business and fertilizers to attract foreign capital and improve export competitiveness.
    At the end of the 3-day official visit of King Mohammed VI to Nigeria, 21 Bilateral Agreements were signed between Nigeria and the Kingdom of Morocco.
    Seven of the agreements were signed on Friday while the remaining 14 agreements were signed on yesterday.

  • Forum seeks women participation in job creation, regional integration

    Forum seeks women participation in job creation, regional integration

    Strengthening opportunities for women involvement in agriculture was among issues addressed by delegates at the Second African Women Innovation and Entrepreneurship Forum(AWIEF), which was held in Lagos. DANIEL ESSIET reports.

    Experts and thought leaders  at the Second African Women Innovation and Entrepreneurship Forum (AWIEF), which was held in Lagos, have  urged governments across the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) to work towards a strong economy and increased  women participation in food production and processing.

    The forum also held sessions on vital sectors and pushed for ventures to promote food production, value addition, job creation and regional integration.

    AWIEF founder and Chief Executive Officer, Mrs Irene Ochem stressed the need to empower women to ensure they attain their potential through agriculture.

    Mrs Ochem said the aim of the forum was to stimulate actions to accelerate Africa’s economic transformation, which require capacity building, inclusive growth and cooperation. She called for robust policies that encourage women to go into agribusinesses and adopt  farming practices that guarantee food security.

    One of the moderators and Chair, Run on Rana Energy Limited, Amina Ado, observed that agriculture represents a promising growth opportunity.

    Underscoring the role of women in agriculture, Ado said support for women would enable them to solve problems through food production.

    She said the Federal Government had inaugurated a roadmap for the agriculture sector, tagged:The Green Alternative: Agriculture Promotion Policy, 2016-2020, with the vision to revive the sector to boost food production. The policy, according to her, would serve as the fulcrum for economic diversification, inclusive growth and sustainable development.

    She said through the policy, farmers would have access to land, information, inputs, production management, storage, processing, marketing and trade and finance.

    In addition, she said there was a possibility of achieving economic diversification which would reduce dependence on oil.

    President, Ghana Association of Women Entrepreneurs (GAWE), Lucia Quachey, stressed the  need for women to work together  to  ensure they have access to the $300 million fund set aside by the African Development Bank (AFDB) for women to boost their businesses.

    She canvassed a regional strategy to promote women’s participation in the sector.

    She said economies could begin to close the gender gap by making it possible for more women to unleash their potential as farmers, entrepreneurs and business leaders.

    The sector, according to her, remains a significant contributor to poverty reduction and food security. She added that empowering women would benefit economies in terms of value addition, job creation and regional integration.

    Quachey, who is also the Vice-President, ECOWAS Federation of Women Entrepreneurs, expressed concern over the decreasing number of women in agriculture.

    She called for support for women to participate and benefit from transformation opportunities to improve their lives and livelihoods.

    She stressed that there was a need to develop women’s capacity to boost food production and create more wealth, if the economies of the sub-region must pick up.

    GAWE, according to her, supports women to participate profitably in value chain and agribusiness development by improving access to financial services, business skills and technologies and innovations for agro-processing.

    GAWE’s initiatives, she added, seek to enhance women entrepreneurs’ access to opportunities, including technologies that facilitate efficient ways of starting up or conducting a business.

    According to her, employment opportunities would increase as more women-led agro micro-enterprises in remote, rural communities take advantage of trade opportunities to boost revenues.

    She said through the initiatives, linkages were established between farmers and micro-enterprises.

    The association, she added, provides training on marketing and helps women producers explore opportunities and develop a catalogue of products.

    Agro-processing, a step-up in the industrialisation drive, is still underdeveloped but offers tremendous commercial opportunities Quachey said.

    Involvement of women, she noted, would bring in some of the revenue governments need for development if member economies advance women’s economic participation in agriculture and food processing.

    While the potential exists for women to position their products in new markets, continued support is needed to help them move  from local enterprises to big businesses.

    She said by increasing women’s participation and enhancing their efficiency and productivity, a dramatic impact on the competitiveness and growth of the region’s economies can be achieved.

    One solution she suggested to boost women participation was creation of agricultural co-operatives.

    The existence of such groups in Ghana, she noted, has provided an institutional framework for women to solve many of their problems.

    President, Sidi Osho Foundation and past Vice- Chancellor, Afe Babalola University, Prof Sidi Osho said feeding the burgeoning population would require significant improvements in agricultural productivity and appropriate mechanisation strategies.

    She said there was enormous potential in agriculture and women must be ready to turn them into major opportunities to change their lives.

    She added that large scale farming and well-developed infrastructure are the best way of drawing women into the agricultural sector.

    According to her, economic transformation is now urgent due to recent developments in the international economy.

    She pointed out that recent developments in the African economies have  made the need for agricultural transformation more urgent as the events have exposed the vulnerability of most economies to external factors.

    She emphasised the need for structural transformation in the agricultural sector and for the government to concentrate on the potential offered by industrialisation and food production. If women farmers increase their productivity and reduce  imports, this would reduce poverty, enhance food and nutrition security and support a more inclusive pattern of growth.

    She encouraged the audience to use the forum as an opportunity to galvanise more action on economic transformation.

    The Chair person, Partnership Opportunities for Women Empowerment Realisation (POWER), Mrs. Obioma Liyel-Imoke,who was  represented by its Executive Director, Mrs Ndodeye Bassey-Obongha stressed the need for increased investments in women  as they make up 43 per cent of the agriculture labour force.

    Although women have a large role in food production in many sub-Saharan African countries, she maintained that they will continue to have less access to land, fertilisers, seeds, credit and extension services than men.

    She said: “Women’s economic participation and their ownership and control over productive assets speed up development, help overcome poverty, reduce inequalities and improve children’s nutrition, health, and school attendance.”

    She explained that the organisation, Project Awake, is a community-driven project whose target beneficiaries are women “agric-preneurs”.

    Project Awake implementation, she  added,  is  done in agro enterprise clusters.  Each cluster is made up of 10 villages selected along mandate crop geographical mapping within each local government area.

    The project has created 2,960 women agribusiness owners from 183 cooperatives created in the 18 local government areas(LGAs) of Cross River State. In addition, she said the project has facilitated access to credit loan through bank linkages for 2,196 women farmers.

    For instance, she said  one of the  organisations, Mossi Women Cooperative, engaged in cassava farming received $2,896.74 as loan and had increased their farm size from 1.5 to 2.5 hectares.

    Another group, Beyin Business Multi-Purpose Cooperative Society (MPCS),she mentioned, could only

    buy only a maximum of 20 bags of rice for storage, but with the loan of N930, 000 ($4,730.42), they added N1, 000,000 ($5,086.47) from their savings and bought up to 413 bags of rice for the first time which they had processed and sold, raising a revenue of N3, 500,000 ($17,802.64) during the trading cycle.

    One of the highlights of the event was the unveiling of Women Economic Empowerment Initiative (WEEIN), a programme designed by the Lagos State Government in partnership with AWIEF to facilitate access to finance and other services needed by women entrepreneurs.