Tag: Religion

  • Religion, morality and development

    Sir, Our practice of religions has failed abysmally in effecting moral regeneration among us. A country whose religious leaders cannot hold aloft the moral compass and torch for their compatriots will come adrift. Not surprisingly, and consequently, too, there is an erosion of moral and family values among us. Here, good is deemed bad; and bad, good. Nothing shocks and offends us, anymore. Moral vices have become normative in Nigeria.

    People destitute of positive morality do perpetrate corrupt deeds. And we are not unaware that corruption is the bane of Nigeria. A morally up right person will not divert public money entrusted in his care into his private bank account rules and regulations to achieve his lofty objectives. And a morally upright person is aware of what constitutes good and bad.

    Our dear country teems with people who have moral vacuity and spiritual aridity. They indulge in deeds that destroy our country. Human beings mobilize and galvanize other factors such as natural resources, labour, and capital to effect national development. And if they place their selfish interests above other considerations owing to their moral vacuity, then Nigeria will remain an underdeveloped country.

    Our lack of positive morality is the reason why we indulge in corrupt deeds. And while perpetrating evil deeds, we do not have prick of conscience and qualms. So, it is imperative for our religious leaders to effect moral regeneration among us.

    It is sad to note that Nigerians are putting their religions to bad uses. Some Islamic clerics brainwash and indoctrinate young Muslims with teachings that are not contained in the Koran. They misinterpret and twist them to suit their purposes. That is why the Boko Haram insurgency in the North-east has not been eradicated. And many men of the cloth subordinate biblical teachings that border on spirituality, holiness, and love beneath the performance of miracles and propagation of prosperity messages.

    There is a connection between our underdevelopment and the erosion of moral values among us. A person with positive morality and active restrictive mechanism will not undermine his country’s progress for selfish reasons. Our adherence to religious injunctions, no doubt, will activate our consciences and imbue us with positive morality. Then, we will start to desist from engaging in acts that can destroy our country.

    Chiedu Uche Okoye,

    Uruowulu-Obosi, Anambra State

     

  • Religion as PDP’s campaign weapon

    Religion as PDP’s campaign weapon

    SIR: One had thought that the resort to exploitation of religion as a political weapon by the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) only emanated from and stopped at the level of goody-goody spokespersons who, could gracefully be excused for struggling to keep their lucrative positions. More so that some of them just made the transition from relative oblivion and penury to sudden fame and fortunes practically overnight!

    Nigerians were on countless occasions inundated by these spokespersons with statements clearly aimed at exploiting our religious fault lines with a view to achieving mundane political ends. And, not quite unreasonably, some of us shrugged such statements off as the handiwork of overzealous spokespersons who might just be abusing delegated authority. However, vice president Namadi Sambo disproved this assumption a January 21, in Dutse, Jigawa State when they were campaigning. So, exploitation of our religious differences has truly all along been the crux of this government’s deliberate official homeland policy and; the unholy weapon intentionally employed to divide and rule Nigerians?

    Sambo’s utterances in Dutse should seriously worry and agitate the mind of whoever wishes Nigeria good. The man mounted the campaign podium to give his supporters a reason why they should not vote for APC. And, you know what the odd reason was? That Buhari’s running mate, Prof. Yemi Osinbajo was the owner of 5,000 capacity church!

    What did Sambo hope to achieve by that, for heaven’s sake? Is the ownership of church a crime in Nigeria or even in Islam itself? Can Sambo or his boss look Pastor Enoch Adeboye in the face and repeat what he said in Dutse verbatim? If Sambo’s audience aren’t educated, enlightened or exposed enough to know that Islam and Christianity are mutual friends rather than foes, wouldn’t it have helped if Sambo had taken time to educate and enlighten his audience especially at these volatile times? Or is Sambo also lacking in proper understanding of Islam to know that the religion he wanted to belittle and bring to the opprobrium of his audience was lavishly accommodated even by Prophet Muhammad (SAW)?

    Islamic scholars of comparative studies of religions couldn’t have done more justice to the topic of how Islam and Christianity share much more than some ignorant fellows are aware of! The little differences we have are not worthy of and should never be exploited by politicians for self service. For instance is VP Sambo and his like minds aware of the existence of these verses in the Holy Qur’an:

    And nearest among them in love to the believers will you find those who say, ‘we are Christians’ because among them are men devoted to learning and men who have renounced the world. And they are not arrogant”. Quran Chap 5v85.

    “…Had it not been for God’s repelling some people through the might of others, the monasteries, churches, synagogues and mosques wherein the name of God is oft praised would have been utterly destroyed. God shall certainly help those who help His cause. He is all powerful, Majestic” Qur’an 22v40

    So, where did Sambo get his inspiration to blackmail a fellow Nigerian for ‘owning’ a church’? Surely not Islam!

     

    • Ibrahim Muhammed Sani Hadejia,

     Gusau, Katsina State.

  • Religion and safe driving skills

    Religion and safe driving skills

    My research has shown that every religion teaches the basic principles that guarantee safe driving in every environment if strictly followed. God is most concerned about the attitude of our hearts. Let us look at some of the points:

     

    1. Do not kill – God clearly tells us that He does not want us to kill either through road accident or other means

     

    Bible

     

    a. Exodus 20:13

    b. Deuteronomy 5:17

    c. Luke 18:20

     

    Quran

     

    a. Sura 4:29

    b.  Sura 4:92-93

     

    2. Obey the road traffic laws and regulations

     

    God clearly tells us to obey the government and even pray for the Leaders. We are, therefore, expected to always obey the laws of the Federal Republic of Nigeria including the road traffic laws and regulations – traffic signs, road markings and other traffic laws. Let the fear of God be in you when driving (this will guarantee you wisdom for the right driving acts)

     

    Bible

     

    a. Deuteronomy 13:4

    b.  Titus 3:1

    c.  Hebrew 13:17

    d.  Proverbs 1:33

    e.  Proverb 1:2-7

     

    Quran

     

    a. Surah 7:55-56

     

    3. Avoid road rage and aggressive driving

     

    When other people (Drivers and other road users) make us angry, we may want to get even, but God says we must do good to those who offend us. We must guard our hearts against hatred for anyone on the road. We must cultivate the habit of seeing other road users as members of our immediate or nuclear family and always relate to them as such, lovingly and wholeheartedly.

     

    Bible

    a. Mathew 5:21-22

    b. Mathew 5:38 – 48

     

    Quran

    a. Surah 13:21-25

     

    4. Defensive driving (hazard perception)

     

    We must always use our God-given knowledge, understanding and wisdom to perceive likely hazards on the road and take prompt actions to prevent accidents.

     

    Bible

    a. Proverbs 22:3

    b. Ecclesiastes 8:5

     

    Quran

    a. Surah 7:95

    b. Surah 51:21

     

    5. The eyes of God is watching all our activities on the road

     

    When driving, we should always remind ourselves that God sees and knows everything that we do on the road and the deep motive of every action we take in our driving acts.

     

    Bible

    a. Psalm 94:9

    b. Proverbs 5:21

    c. Proverbs 15:3

     

    Quran

     

    a. Surah 2:233

    b. Surah 2:237

  • Presidency 2015: Neither religion nor ethnicity

    Presidency 2015: Neither religion nor ethnicity

    Some February 2015, Nigerians would not be electing a bishop or an imam: we would be choosing a president. But you would not think so judging by the way religion is being manipulated to influence potential voting decisions.

    As if that were not bad enough, the usual suspects are already at it pushing ethnicity for all it is worth to gain political advantage. None of this is strange because these issues have always been overt factors in Nigerian politics.

    Indeed, it would be naïve and unrealistic to try to totally keep them out of politics. Even in the US which popularised the principle of separation of church and state, this is only observed in breach. They may not have a state religion but ‘In God We Trust’ is inscribed on their national currency.

    Even in largely homogeneous societies like the US, religion in politics sometimes manifests in positions taken by candidates e.g. Do they want prayer in schools or are they pro or anti-abortion?

    In multi-ethnic and multi-religious societies like ours you cannot run away from balancing. Giving people a sense of belonging is one thing, but when a person’s suitability for office becomes a function of what faith he follows, we need to ask hard questions.

    What I find discomfiting is the virulence with which these factors are being deployed this election cycle – without a proper sense that we are playing with dynamite. From Lebanon to Iraq to Northern Ireland, the human suffering caused by the combustible mix of religion and politics isn’t something to recommend to an enemy.

    In the past we somehow managed to step back from the brink. This time around, Boko Haram has poisoned the air with atrocities that have sharply polarised the ethnic and religious divides.

    Things are not helped by the fact that the two major political parties are set to pick the candidates from the opposing geographical poles – reprising the age-long North-South contestation for power. It was only in 1999 that we were briefly spared the aggravation when the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and the then All Peoples Party (APP) chose candidates from the South West.

    The PDP pulled out the religious card quite early as it sought to define the nascent All Progressives Congress (APC) as an ‘Islamic party.’ The ruling party’s spokesman, Olisah Metuh, enthusiastically accused the opposition of propagating Janjaweed ideology. The basis of this accusation was that the party that was then in formation had a preponderance of Muslims in leadership positions.

    After the APC’s first convention, a new hierarchy reflecting a better religious and ethnic balance emerged. But then suspicions that had been sown in the minds of the impressionable were reinforced with talk that the party was seriously considering selecting a Muslim-Muslim slate to challenge President Goodluck Jonathan.

    As the opposition intensified their attacks against the government for its impotence in the face of rampaging insurgents who had graduated from just lobbing bombs to actually holding territory, an administration on the defensive felt the best way to fight back was to accuse APC of sponsoring and funding the insurgency.

    Having made this astonishing claim, the government didn’t move to prosecute those it accused of such treasonable offences. By not taking that step it destroyed the credibility of the allegations. That has not stopped the administration from repeating the same meaningless claims in the face of new criticisms – and it leaves you wondering why.

    Matters of faith don’t lend themselves to reason since they flow from our hearts and emotions. Each time Boko Haram – in the name of Islam – invade a village in the North East, burn down churches and murder Christians, it plays strongly into the ‘them-against-us’ narrative.

    Just this last week at the meeting of the Nigeria Inter-Religious Council (NIREC) – a forum formed to promote better understanding between Nigeria’s two leading faiths, what made headlines were the exchanges between Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN) President, Pastor Ayo Oritsejafor and the Sultan of Sokoto, Abubakar Saad.

    Oritsejafor had complained bitterly about the slaughter of innocent Christians in the North. He spoke of unjust treatment exemplified by the fact that in many parts of the region Christians cannot get land to build churches, and where they manage to get land they are denied Certificate of Occupancy (C of O) for no just cause.

    He then challenged the Sultan to direct the same letter he had written to ISIS to Boko Haram. The suggestion was that major Muslim leaders had not bent the ears of the insurgents sufficiently to turn them from their evil ways. Naturally, his views were not well received by the other side.

    I sympathise with Oritsejafor because much of what he said is the true experience of many Christians in the far North. Even before the coming of Boko Haram, sectarian clashes in which scores lost their lives were common occurrences in the last few decades.

    However, the CAN President’s comments don’t capture the total picture. If Christians have been victims of the insurgency, Muslims have also suffered terribly. Boko Haram has murdered thousands of nameless people who share the same faith they claim to be propagating across the Northern states.

    On Friday, at least 120 worshipper were killed when suicide bombers attacked the Emir of Kano’s mosque. Last week 45 innocent souls were blown to bits in a Maiduguri market after two female suicide bombers detonated their deadly cargo. A few days after in Adamawa, a roadside IED believed to have been planted by the sect claimed another 35 lives. I doubt whether these explosives were primed with instructions to slay adherents of a particular religion.

    There are serious unresolved issues in Nigeria revolving around ethnicity, indigene status and religion that we need to sit down and discuss frankly. A situation where the constitution talks of not adopting a state religion, while some Northern states openly do so undermines coherence and trust in the federation.

    That said, we must accept that Boko Haram has gone beyond the ‘them-versus-us’ stage. Those being murdered in places like Gwoza, Damboa, Bama etc are not all Christians. This is something that requires everyone pulling together. It is something that has defeated everything the current administration has thrown at it. Even with outside help, we now have a pseudo-caliphate on our doorstep.

    That is why I find it truly reprehensible that politicians are trying to fight the 2015 elections by manipulating religion and ethnicity – rather than focusing on their record and manifesto.

    When you hang the tag of an ‘Islamic party’ on your opponents, are you not suggesting that yours is the ‘Christian party’? The president has not helped with his subliminal religious campaigning involving church-hopping.  To decide whether he was going to run or not, we were subjected to a primetime ‘pilgrimage’ to Jerusalem flanked by two of the country’s most prominent pastors. Are their flock supposed to read between the lines and fall in line?

    Christians who try to paint Jonathan as the candidate for their religion need to pause and reflect. Voting for the incumbent president won’t take anyone to heaven, just as voting for his likely Muslim opponent will not open the gates of Paradise to anyone.

    How has Jonathan being a Christian furthered the Christian cause in Nigeria? Under his watch thousands of Christians are being slaughtered across the North and the butchering continues.

    I recollect that over two years ago when the US first toyed with the idea of designating Boko Haram a Foreign Terrorist Organisation (FTO), agents of the Jonathan government in collaboration with the American State Department then led by Hillary Clinton argued strenuously at the Congress against it.

    They painted a picture of the sect as a minor irritant that could be controlled with home-grown solutions. At that same hearing was a CAN delegation led by Pastor Oritsejafor. He and his team were thoroughly astonished that agents of a government ostensibly led by a Christian would be making such arguments. All they were after was anything that would check the sect. They left America bitterly disappointed.

    Instead of demonising individuals and any particular religion, let us wake up as Nigerians and confront our demons. Since we have not agreed to dissolve our union, we must tell ourselves the truth and not allow political scam artists to take us for another ride in the same tattered religious cum ethnicity jalopy.

    As things stand in this country today, no Muslim can win an election without Christian votes and vice versa. Nobody can impose any religion on us without having to deal with the National Assembly and the 36 state houses of assembly.

    Voters must ask themselves if they are going to elect a president based on his piety or their performance. We are suffocated with religiousity and church/mosque-going at election time. Once the elections are won and lost, these supposedly pious politicians return to business as usual. How is it that with all our holy and prayerful politicians Nigeria is so messed up?

    We remember religion when it helps us carve up the nation’s wealth. Our faith takes a back seat as we despoil the land and desecrate the offices that God in his mercies has allowed us to occupy; we abuse the powers we should hold in trust for the people.

    We hoodwink the ignorant with ethnicity whereas the fact is voting for someone with whom you share tribal identity doesn’t change much if you’re not in his close circle.

    Northern leaders governed Nigeria for close to 40 years and yet their region remains the poorest and most backward in the country. Chief Olusegun Obasanjo was in office for eight years as civilian president. By the time he left, most roads in Sango-Ota where he used to live were impassable. Jonathan has been in office for over five years and millions of people from the South-South zone are still living a hardscrabble life.

    Instead of being scammed through sentiment Nigerians should realise that what we desperately need is a leader who will drag this blessed country out of backwardness.

    When a Christian leader delivers 24-hour electricity it’s not only for Christians, when a Muslim provides tap water it will also run in the homes of members of the other faith.

    Nigerian politicians playing the religion and ethnic card should remember the immortal words of our inimitable First Lady, Dame Patience Jonathan: ‘There is God oooooo!!!! And He’s a consuming fire.

  • Why bring religion into politics?

    Sir: I am a Christian who admires Islam. To me, there is no difference between Christianity and Islam. That is my belief. Islam preaches peace. So does Christianity. So, where is the difference?
    Both Islam and Christianity are perfect religions. Any imperfection is not from the two wonderful religions but from religious charlatans who masquerade as religious faithful. Both Islam and Christianity do not produce terrorists. It is some charlatans that produce them. I have read both Holy Books. They are wonderful.
    I have seen true Muslims. I have seen fake Muslims. I have seen fake Christians. I have seen true Christians. So, where is the difference? There is no difference between Islam and Christianity.
    I have seen instances where some Muslims have troubled some Muslims but some Christians have come to the aid of the troubled Muslims. I have seen instances where some Christians have troubled some Christians but some Muslims have come to the aid of the troubled Christians. Then, what are we talking about?
    I would want us to bury the din about the Muslim-Muslim ticket or Christian-Christian ticket in politics. To be blunt, religion and politics are not really related. I am not a politician. I do not belong to any political party. However, I am interested in who rules. This is democracy; government of the people, by the people and for the benefit of the people. We should have good political culture and not embrace political apathy.
    Since there is no difference between Islam and Christianity, we should forget same-religion candidates but cogitate about a perfect pair (not a lethal lot from different religions whose reign has always been catastrophic). I don’t see anything wrong in voting for two Muslims or two Christians if their leadership will better the lots of all Nigerians come 2015. Please let us think twice before we choose our leaders this time round.
    In 2011, I voted for General Buhari, a Muslim, because I knew he was the best candidate. In 2015, I will vote for General Buhari and anybody who will be his running mate because he is still the best candidate.
    The bottom-line: A Muslim-Muslim ticket or a Christian-Christian ticket should not bring about any din. It is politics, not marriage. It is only in a home that religion can bring about clashes. What we should talk about is a perfect pair or a perfect match that will re-write our history positively.

    • Abraham Kehinde Olalemi,
    Ibadan.

  • Jeyifo, religion and science

    Dear Sir,

    I write in response to Biodun Jeyifo’s three-part article on “Religion and science, faith and reason”, published in your issues of the October 5th, 12th and 19th October, 2014.

    I have always enjoyed reading his articles in The Nation on Sunday, as they seem to address issues of national importance from the “common man’s” point of view. There are several points raised in his article under consideration, but space will not permit me to deal with them adequately here.

    Although there are several inaccuracies in the article which he himself and Olabode Lucas have tried to remedy in different issues of your newspaper, I would like to comment on his claim that religion and science are not at variance with each other. He writes: “… religion and science are not incompatible, not mutually antithetical. … I mean religious expressions that are not opposed to the rational processes of the human mind … see the hand of God in these processes.” This is a curious statement, for somewhere in his article Jeyifo has told his audience that religion has historically fought a losing battle with science! How can two spheres of life that are supposedly compatible fight wars with each other? We can only resolve this contradiction by saying that religion and science are completely different spheres of human experience. Freethinkers from Anaxagoras through Bertrand Russell to Richard Dawkins have shown religion not only to be evil but also incompatible with the rational, scientific temper of the human mind. Religion thrives on fear, superstition and blind trust. Science is based on facts, on evidence, and on rigorous logic.  There is no common ground on which they can communicate, except at the private level of the individual.

    Jeyifo also claims that “All the Nobel Laureates in the sciences … also believe in God.” This is a blatant lie. In fact, the reverse seems to be true: most scientists in the developed world are atheists. According to statistics quoted by Richard Dawkins in his book, The God Delusion, nearly 79% of the Fellows of the UK’s prestigious Royal Society are nonbelievers, and 93% of the USA’s Members of the National Academy of Sciences are atheists. Their proportions are almost certainly higher in France, Sweden and Japan.

    Richard Feynman, a famous American Nobel Laureate in physics, even said: “God is always invented to explain those things that you do not understand.” Most European Enlightenment intellectuals of the 18th century were freethinkers. Einstein was an atheist, as is Stephen Hawking today.

    Individual scientists may, for different reasons, have religious conviction, but this is often independent of their scientific pursuit. The Rev. John Polkinghorne, for example, is an Anglican parson who also won the Nobel Prize in physics, but he has never argued that religion and science are compatible. Georges E. Lemaitre was a Belgian Catholic priest and cosmologist, one of the originators of the big bang theory, who never brought God into how the Universe began, to the consternation of the Pope. Examples such as these abound, today as in the past.

    In Nigeria, the picture is doubly confusing. It seems to me that most Nigerian scientists who turn to God do so for purely pecuniary reasons, perhaps as a reflection of Max Weber’s Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. Superstition and fear of the unknown undoubtedly also play a part in pushing many professors to religion. The country seems to produce an abundance of academics (smart guys who can score high marks at exams) rather than intellectuals (those with broad-based education who can engage in genuine critical thinking). It is perhaps not surprising that our national IQ is abysmally low. In a study to examine the relationship between religious belief and national IQ covering 137 countries, the correlation was generally found to be negative: those countries with the highest percentages of believers also scored relatively poorly in their national IQ. On the other hand, Japan had an IQ of 102 with only 35% of its people believing in God.

    While we bemoan the woeful performance of our children at WASC and NECO exams, we should also be concerned that religiously inclined professors of science are contributing to our low national IQ.

    By Gilbert Alabi Diche

    Rayfield, Jos.x

  • Obasanjo, Buhari differ on ‘same religion’ ticket

    Obasanjo, Buhari differ on ‘same religion’ ticket

    Former President Olusegun Obasanjo disagreed yesterday with the All Progressives Congress (APC) presidential aspirant, General Muhammadu Buhari, on the place of religion in determining how a party should pick its presidential and vice presidential candidates for next year’s election.

    Buhari said Nigerians genuinely need a President and a vice-president who would place Nigeria first and pull it out of the brinks, regardless of whether or not both are Muslims or Christian.

    But Obasanjo noted that a Muslim-Muslim or Christian-Christian presidential ticket at this time of the nation’s precarious unity was not only absurd but also out of tune with the present Nigeria.

    The former President, who was apparently reacting to Buhari’s position, said: “It will be insensitive to the point of absurdity for any leader or any party to be toying with a Muslim-Muslim or Christian-Christian ticket at this juncture.”

    Buhari, a former Head of State and three times a presidential candidate, told The Cable, an online media, that he saw nothing wrong with a Muslim-Muslim or Christian-Christian ticket.

    The APC aspirant said his position did not make him a “fundamentalist”.

    He said: “I had demonstrated to Nigerians that I’m not a fundamentalist and there is nothing more I can do. Nigerians will always uncover impossible room for manoeuvre for politicians. I had to face one of the governors during one of our party’s meetings (over the issue of religion).

    “In 2003, I chose (the late Senator) Chuba Okadigbo as my running mate. He was a Roman Catholic. He was an Igbo. In 2007, I picked Edwin Ume-Ezeoke. He was a Roman Catholic. He was an Igbo. And in 2010, I chose even a pastor – Tunde Bakare.

    “Honestly, what do Nigerians want me to do? If they don’t believe I’m not a fundamentalist, what else can I do?

    “How about (the late Bashorun) Moshood Abiola, a Southern Muslim, who picked Babagana Kingibe, a Northern Muslim, as running mate in the 1993 presidential election? The Muslim-Muslim ticket went on to win an election that is still considered by many as the most credible in Nigeria’s history.

    “I have not absolutely closed my mind to picking a Christian or Muslim as running mate, if I get the ticket. This is because I firmly believe that Nigerians, having gone through what they have gone through, realise it is not a matter of religion but a matter of Nigeria.

    “The main religions – Christianity and Islam – know and they believe in Almighty God. The question of stealing and short-changing people in the name of religion should stop.”

    But in a statement yesterday from his Presidential Hill Top Estate in Abeokuta, the Ogun State capital, Obasanjo explained that because of the current peculiar situation of the country, it is pertinent that any leader or political party should run away from a Muslim-Muslim or Christian-Christian ticket in next year’s presidential election.

    Obasanjo said: “Sensitivity is a necessary ingredient for enhancement of peace, security and stability at this point in the political discourse and arrangement for Nigeria and for encouraging confidence and trust.

    “It will be insensitive to the point of absurdity for any leader or any political party to be toying with a Muslim-Muslim or Christian-Christian ticket at this juncture.

    “Nigeria cannot, at this stage, raise the spectre and fear of Islamisation or Christianisation. The idea of proselytisation in any form is a grave danger that must not be contemplated by any serious-minded politician at this delicate situation in Nigeria. This time is different from any other time.

    “Therefore, disregarding the fact that there are fears that need to be allayed at this point will amount not only to insensitivity of the

    highest order but will also amount to bad politics indeed.”

  • Religion as campaign tool for elections

    SIR: It is high time Nigerians collectively see religion as a personal relationship between them and God and one of the freedoms constitutionally guaranteed.

    The bitter truth is that today, politicians and religious bigots dangerously use religion to heat up the polity with a view to creating tension to divert the attention of the people from corruption and misrule which have remained hallmark of governance in the country.  Since there is no religion that promotes or supports corruption in any form, come 2015, politicians who believe that religion is a weapon needed to be invoked in order to win an election will be disappointed as the Nigerian electorates have come to realise that the use of religion is not to promote good governance and make life more meaningful to the people, but a ploy to get to power through the back door.

    Religion, like poverty and greed, has no tribal mark and it is high time we collectively realized that religion has no place in assessment of poverty level.  One thing that we have collectively chosen to turn our eyes from is the fact that all religions abhor corruption and the earlier we begin to use religion as a positive force for stamping out the menace with a view to making life more meaningful in our country, the better.

    It is also high time Nigerians borrowed a leaf from their Yoruba counterparts whose culture showcases harmonious co-existence among them irrespective of religious belief and whose culture also does not place much premium on religion in elections.

    Our country has been described as religious but ungodly. Our leaders before assumption of public office, in all the three tiers of government do swear with either the Holy Bible or the Holy Koran during which they ‘solemnly’ pledge “to be faithful loyal and honest” in the discharge of their official duties with a final demand “so help me God”.  What has been the outcome of the avalanche of religious oath-taking symbolized by placement of Holy Books in hands vis-à-vis the level of corruption in our country today?

    What should be uppermost in the minds of our religious leaders now is the revelation that 75% of suicide deaths in the whole world are reported in our country.  Today, public schools which offered good and affordable education to the people have been relegated to the background. People with abysmal low purchasing power struggling to make ends meet are being painfully made to pay through their nose to get their children educated. The situation today in Nigeria is that many parents are left with nothing after they have managed to pay their children’s fees – nothing left for food, housing, and shelter.

     

    • Odunayo Joseph,

    Lagos

  • The religion and science, faith and reason controversy – again (1)

    The religion and science, faith and reason controversy – again (1)

    I was rather pleasantly surprised by most of the emails that I received from the piece that I wrote for this column last week, this being my reflections on Dr. Adah Igonoh’s story about her survival in the battle against the Ebola Virus Disease (EVD). Many people wrote to tell me that they had also found Dr. Igonoh’s story very moving, very inspiring. I was pleased to read this, but quite frankly this was not what I found pleasantly surprising in the bulk of the emails that I received on last week’s column. What surprised and pleased me in the emails was this: virtually everyone who wrote informed me that, like me and academics of my type, they also think that there is no necessary and inevitable opposition or incompatibility between religion and science. Although it did occur to me that most of those who wrote the emails to me were probably people who generally share my views on many aspects of our country’s current crises and challenges, nonetheless it was pleasing to find that many readers of last week’s column also think that religion and science, faith and reason should not go their separate ways in any modern-day nation in our world. So far, so good, as the saying goes.

    But then I noticed a pattern in these emails that rather disturbed me. This was because in nearly every case, those who wrote those emails to me felt that the need for religion and science to, as it were, “walk together” in any modern state was so obvious that anyone should be able to see and affirm that need. Why I found this disturbing is the subject of this week’s essay, thus making it something of an epilogue to last week’s column. My central argument in this piece is that though the need for religion and science to work together harmoniously in the modern world seems fairly obvious, that obviousness is not to be taken for granted, not to be assumed to be without any tension, any stress. The struggle of science against religion, more specifically against the fanatical dogma of organized, institutionalized religion, is one of the central themes of modern intellectual history. At the height of that struggle, brilliant and gifted scientists were burnt at the stakes. Those who were not burnt were made to recant on their scientific theories and were banned for life from the pursuit of their scientific vocation. We cannot go into the full details of this history, but in the end science prevailed and religion had to make its peace with the decisive, transformative role of science in modern life, in the specifically modern organization of society and its productive relations and activities.

    Since our country and our continent are constituent parts of the modern world, we are heirs to that monumental struggle between religion and science. Nonetheless, that struggle never took place, never shook society to its foundations in our own part of the world. This is both good and bad. In this essay, I wish to reflect upon the good and bad parts of this historic fact that in our society, our own part of modernity, science and scientists never had to struggle against the powerful institutional, doctrinal and ideological authority of organized religion. Let’s deal first with the good part of this crucial fact that science and scientists in Africa never really had to wage fierce battles against the forces of organized religion and its historic opposition to rationality as a cardinal basis of life.

    As reported by Chinua Achebe in his famous collection of essays, The Trouble with Nigeria, in the 1950s, the Minister of Education in the old Western Region, Dr. S.A. Awokoya, wrote a book titled Why Our Children Die. According to Achebe, Awokoya wrote that book as a medical scientist who took up arms against traditional African cultural beliefs and practices that wittingly or unwittingly caused or promoted high levels of infant mortality in our society. As I have not been able to lay my hands on that book by Dr. Awokoya, I am going by what Achebe says about it in his book. And what Achebe says is that Dr. Awokoya in his book took up arms in defence or promotion of science and rationality against beliefs and practices in our traditional cultures that militated against rational explanations and remedies for diseases, together with the practice of private and public hygiene, especially with regard to the great vulnerability of children to diseases and lack of hygiene.

    The allusion to Achebe and Awokoya in this discussion helps us to see, I hope, that the “enemy” of science in Africa was not organized religion. More crucially, Achebe and Awokoya were careful to emphasize the fact that it was not the entirety of the African cultural heritage that was against science and rationality; rather, it was some specific and identifiable beliefs and practices that constituted the composite enemy. As a matter of fact, both Achebe and Awokoya were products of the schools of a rationalized, “modernized” form of Christianity that promoted science and the scientific spirit in our part of the world, even as theological and doctrinal branches of these same forms of Christianity waged holy wars against the entire heritage of culture on our continent. Achebe and Awokoya, as archetypal figures in the story of science, rationality and religion in our continent, showed us that this was and is a complex story in which organized religion, traditional cultures and the scientific spirit could not be divided into a simple pattern of opposites and negatives, illumination and mystification. Some parts of traditional cultures were not in opposition to the scientific enterprise, just as some doctrinal aspects of Christianity opposed all aspects of traditional cultures, not because they were against science but because they were thought to be the antithesis of the one true God of the Christians or Moslems. In other words, faith and rationality in modern Africa never got caught and fixated in the radical and uncompromising opposition that medieval, pre-modern Christianity in Europe mounted between religion and science. This is the good part of the overall narrative. We now move to the bad part.

    For this, it helps to put matters in concrete and perhaps even dramatic terms. No scientists were ever burnt at the stakes on our continent. But this also means that no scientist ever achieved a heroic stature as the defender of the scientific spirit and enterprise against the forces of religious medievalism. For it was precisely because of these factors that science in Europe was able to win commerce, industry and the popular imagination to its side in the struggle against organized religion. There is another way to put this observation in terms that are perhaps even more graphic and it is this: we do not have a single man or woman of science to match the iconic stature of an Achebe or a Soyinka, none at all. Achebe, Soyinka, Clark, Okigbo and the other icons of modern Nigeria literature achieved their stature because they challenged and overcame the racist, colonialist canard that we did not have what it takes to produce works of literature that are equal to the best literary works from other regions of the world. In our celebration of the achievements of these icons of modern Nigerian writing, we often place too much emphasis on their talent, their genius and in the process underestimate the struggles that they had to wage. Thus, though talent and genius are very important, the central factor in this piece is struggle and effort, unceasing and unflagging struggle and effort.

    It is perhaps useful at this point to bring these observations and reflections back to Dr. Adah Igonoh’s story. In doing this, I wish to place as much emphasis as I possibly can on the fact that in last week’s column, I made every effort to highlight and praise the determination and will with which Dr. Igonoh went in search of knowledge and information that could help her prevail over the EVD peril. Repeatedly, I stated that while she spent much time and invested great emotional and spiritual energy in prayers and divine favour, she was also relentless in her search for remedies available from medical science. Please remember that this all took place at a moment in her life when she faced great debilitation from a relentlessly destructive disease. At the risk of offending the sensibilities of many readers who are devout religionists, I wish to point out that at that moment in Dr. Igonoh’s battle with EVD, religion and faith were the easy, assured part of the struggle; far more onerous and demanding was the pursuit and absorption of scientific knowledge and information.

    Knowledge and truth seeking, in all areas of life and experience, is not for the faint-hearted; this is even more so with regard to science. To be a successful and dedicated  woman or man of science takes a lot of hard, grindingly demanding work. With the phenomenal rise and accession to dominance of Pentecostalism in our country and our continent in the last two or three decades, this crucial perspective on what science demands from scientists has been submerged by the belief that you must leave everything, everything, to God. The reason for this is not difficult to find: in many respects, Pentecostalism is medieval in its worldview. It does not exactly have the institutional power and authority that organized religion in medieval Europe had and so it cannot wage a direct assault on science and rationalism as Christianity did in the Middle Ages in Europe. Its assault is more indirect, more subtle in that it comprises the combination of intellectual laziness and fanatical religiosity in which the religiosity provides a cover, a refuge for the intellectual laziness. In next week’s concluding essay in this series, we shall explore how and why it has managed to capture many segments of our national intelligentsia that include men and women of science.

     

    Biodun Jeyifo

    bjeyifo@fas.harvard.edu

  • NOSCEF faults religious demographics on Nigeria

    The Chairman of Christian Elders Forum of Northern States (NOSCEF), Mr. Olaiya Phillips, has cautioned against the use of inadequate statistics to create more tensions between Muslims and Christians.
     
    Phillips, who was reacting to an article titled “U.S.: Nigeria ineffective in quelling violence” in some online publications last week, faulted the attribution of 50% of the nation’s population to Muslims and 40% to Christians.
     
    He described the statistics purportedly generated from the latest United States’ Department of State Report on Religious Freedom as “false and insulting to the Nigerian Christian community.”
     
    Page 67 of the 2014 annual report, Phillips pointed out, stated that “Nigeria’s population of 170 million people is equally divided between Muslims and Christians.”
     
    He also cited the official webpage of the Federal Republic of Nigeria stating that “45% of the population is Christian, 45% Muslim and the rest 10% is a mixture of quite a few indigenous religions.”
     
    The Christian leader said: “Accurate Calculations of our exact population – never mind the religious beliefs of our people – are hard enough to come by.
     
     He said: “Research by the Pew Research Centre Forum on Religion and Public Life in 2011 estimated the number of Nigerian Christians to be 80.5m – roughly 50% of the population, which with the 50% of Muslims would not leave any room for the millions of Nigerians who believe in indigenous religions. Religious demographic at a time the country is fighting the terror war is a great disservice to national unity”.  
     
    “Nigerians do give a great importance to religion.  Publishing incorrect – or at the very least inaccurate – statistics regarding the country’s demographics at a time when the Boko Haram insurgency in the North is attempting to raise tensions between Christian and Muslim communities, is both insensitive and irresponsible – especially to the communities on the front line of the insurgency in the North,” he stressed.
     
    Phillips stated that Muslims and Christians in Nigeria are evenly populated, saying any attempt to paint one as more populous than the other should be discouraged.
     
    He added that there is no way to find out the population of each of the two major religions since no national census has ever included religious index in the country.
     
    According to him: “We all know that the two largest religious groups in the country are Muslims and Christians – each with their many denominations.  Both groups are roughly the same size.  This we know and should remember. 
     
    “But the reporting of incorrect or inaccurate information only helps to drive wedges between our communities.  This is exactly what Boko Haram wants.”