Tag: report

  • Ribadu task force report: ACN says Fed Govt acted in bad faith

    The Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN) has accused the Federal Government of acting in bad faith in the way and manner it has treated the report of the Petroleum Revenue Task Force.

    In a statement issued in Benin yesterday by its National Publicity Secretary, Alhaji Lai Mohammed, the party also said the patently tactless action of a presidential aide, Dr. Doyin Okupe, in rubbishing the report and, by extension the members of the task force, will make credible Nigerians to be wary of serving in similar panels in future.

    “The fact that the Federal Government has not come out to refute Dr. Okupe’s crude comments on the report is an indication that the position he enunciated publicly on the report represents that of the government. The task force did not complete its assignment and accusing its chairman of disinformation and politicisation amounts to preparing the ground for the dumping of the report,” ACN said.

    The party said the treatment meted out to the task force by a self-acclaimed ‘’attack lion’’ of the presidency is the worst blow any government has dealt its own panel, “and confirms ACN’s earlier statement that the Federal Government deliberately set a booby trap for the task force by the suspicious timing of the appointments it gave to two of its members, Steven Oronsaye and Bernard Otti, in the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC).”

    It went on: “Unfortunately, despite its angry reaction to our earlier statement, the government is yet to convince us otherwise. If anything at all, it has gone ahead to make our statement look prescient.

    “We are not even talking of the merits or demerits of the task force’s report, but of the way the chairman and members of the task force (minus the two dissenting ones) have been savaged. This is a task force that has as members several Senior Advocates of Nigeria and a former chairman of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, among others.

    “Even if the government feels the report is inconclusive, could it not have set up a panel to review the findings? Is it not also the prerogative of the government to even leave the report to gather dust, if it does not agree with the findings, instead of publicly ridiculing its own task force?

    “The unprecedented outpouring of public opprobrium on the task force by the same government that set it up makes a mockery of governance, and does no credit to the Jonathan administration, which is always quick to accuse the opposition of insulting its principal. A government earns respect by its actions. It is futile demanding it (respect).”

  • Jonathan and the Ribadu report

    Jonathan and the Ribadu report

    It is so unfortunate that there has been so much ignorant carping and malicious tittle-tattling about the report of the Petroleum Revenue Task Force chaired by Malam Nuhu Ribadu, both failings arising from a deliberate attempt to individualize what was actually group work, a mischievous attempt to politicize one report out of three, and to smuggle into an emergent grand web of conspiracy, elements of blackmail, mischief and outright opportunism.

    I should like to dispel the putrefacious stench of the fart that seems to have overtaken the subject by returning all of us to certain basics that have not changed since President Jonathan approved the setting up of committees to inquire into different aspects of the Petroleum Sector and particularly since the reports were presented and accepted. The facts are as follows.

    The committees in question and the probe into the Petroleum sector were initiated by President Goodluck Jonathan to ensure transparency and accountability in the extractive industry; the goal was to transform the sector and raise levels of integrity accordingly. Every step that has been taken by this administration in this regard has been in fulfillment of this well-stated principle. This includes the decision to completely deregulate the downstream sector, which has now resulted in the exposure of oily deals in that sector, with consequences for the indicted persons.

    It also includes the launch of a concerted fight against crude oil theft and illegal payments of fuel subsidy. Zakari Mohammed of the House of Representatives talks absent-mindedly about “lack of political will” to fight corruption. He certainly doesn’t know what he is talking about. A legislative position should not confer a right to mendacity. He should know, if he had been reading the newspapers, that on the basis of both the report of the House of Representatives and the Aig Aig-Imokhuede committee report on fuel subsidy payments, persons are currently being prosecuted in the law courts by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).

    The Federal Government has not done anything to stop or discourage the prosecution of indicted persons. We have made the point, again and again, that in this on-going fight against corruption, there will be no “cover ups”; and no “sacred cows,” and that President Jonathan’s only interest is the people’s interest. This same President has demonstrated the political will to deal with corruption in the country’s electoral process, to both local and global acclaim. He has no reason to make compromises in other areas of national life. Interestingly, many of those who are now talking ignorantly about “political will” are beneficiaries of this administration’s commitment to the rule of law and fairplay.

    On the specific issue of the Petroleum Revenue Task Force report, the mischief-makers should go back to the statements made by President Jonathan, and subsequently by the Petroleum Minister, Diezani Alison-Madueke, on the occasion of the presentation of the report. The President’s position that the work of the Ribadu Committee, and of the two other committees that presented their reports on that occasion, the Idika Kalu committee on Refineries and the Dotun Sulaiman Committee on Governance is useful and enlightening has not changed. Alison-Madueke has further echoed that position more than twice. The three committees were set up as fact-finding and advisory bodies. That fact was further underscored by the President’s mature response to the altercation that the Ribadu Committee Report generated when he said that those who have issues to raise should be free to make their own independent submissions. This shows a determination to get every possible piece of information and to accommodate all concerns. This shows a will to act. President Jonathan has not dumped any input, rather he welcomes every possible input and he has no private interest in this matter. So for anyone to say that the Ribadu committee was “calculated to fail from the beginning”, is absolutely uncharitable.

    Indeed, for the benefit of those playing politics and doing quick business with this matter, the truth is that President Jonathan is already taking steps to address some of the issues raised in the various reports. When President Jonathan sets up committees to investigate particular issues, he does so, because he wants to address those issues. I had, before now, drawn attention to the fact that the President gave clear directives on the state of the refineries and that at least one meeting had been held since the presentation of the Report on Refineries, to act specifically on the recommendations made. President Jonathan has directed that he wants the refineries fixed and steps are already being taken; deadlines have been set. That didn’t make the headlines, rather, falsehood hugged the headlines, because these days it pays to fart all over the place, and attract attention.

    To set the records straight, here is what happened. After the presentation of the reports by the three committees; the President directed the Minister of Petroleum Resources to take up the recommendations of the Kalu Idika Kalu committee on refineries. The committee recommended, in part, that the country’s refineries should be rehabilitated without any further delay. On November 8, the Minister and her team were at the Villa to brief the President about the state of the refineries, their current capacities, and steps that need to be taken to get them to function at optimum capacity.

    The President made it clear that the government is committed to getting the refineries to work, so that we would no longer have to import refined petroleum products, which he considers shameful, and by so doing, government would have succeeded in creating jobs and put an end to the hardship that attends importation. The meeting discussed the possibility of ensuring the Turn Around Maintenance of the refineries by March 2013, and subsequently, the rehabilitation of the facilities. The meeting ended with a directive that the Minister and her team should return with further presentations on the technical details of the agreed plan of action. This is one clear example of prompt action and demonstration of commitment.

    President Jonathan has no reason to embarrass anyone who served on any of the three committees. While receiving the reports, these were his words: “…we have seen that the people that have been selected in these committees are people that are known by Nigerians, people that are credible, most especially people that are patriotic and I believe that they put all that into consideration for the interest of the country not for the interest of any individual. You have submitted your reports today. We have to thank you very sincerely and government will surely make use of these reports… because we feel that the oil industry as it is, need to be reformed.” I urge you to note the emphasis on all the reports without exception!

    Thereafter, President Jonathan commented on the work of the individual committees. On Dotun Sulaiman committee, he said: “…we feel that our governance and control, (in the oil and gas sector) we need to look at it. And of course quite a number of issues raised by the presenters link up with even the Petroleum Industry Bill (PIB) issues and I believe it will even help the National Assembly robustly in terms of looking at some aspects of the PIB. So we thank you very sincerely for that.”

    On the Kalu Idika Kalu Committee he said: “In the case of the refineries, I really have to thank you because I was listening, trying to see the kind of recommendations you will bring up…Maybe some of you don’t know but those of us who are in politics, they used to “yab” us some years back that in Nigeria we import what we have and export what we don’t have. They say we import what we have because we have crude oil for God’s sake. Ordinarily if it is a country where we placed our focus right, we should be having filling stations all over Africa and all over the world …It is disgraceful that we are importing petroleum products. If in the next ten years this country still imports petroleum products then all of us who have the opportunity to be here, in fact when we die they should write something and put behind us that we did not rule this country well, because we must stop the importation of petroleum products.” Hence, the President held the aforementioned follow-up meeting on refineries.

    Now, on the Ribadu Report, President Jonathan said, inter alia: “…Probably not everybody agreed on some of the conclusions but I don’t think we need to bother…what we would say is that any member who has one or two observations should please write it either directly to me through the Chief of Staff or through the Minister of Petroleum Resources…But the issues of finance, if it borders on corrupt practice or outright stealing, definitely it will go to the EFCC for investigation…If there are errors of calculation or misinformation from the relevant agencies of government that are supposed to give the correct figures, that will be filtered out. It will not be used against anybody, because the interest of government to set up these committees is to help us do what is right. It is not to help us do what is wrong. And that is why we have to be careful and do what is right. So I plead with you. But let me assure you that government has no interest in hiding anything…”

    Let me cut this short, at this point, by saying that President Goodluck Jonathan has no reason whatsoever, personal or political (since at least one character has said that the furore over the Ribadu Report has something to do with 2015!) to protect wrong-doers in the land. He took on this assignment to make Nigeria better and that is what he is doing everyday: working hard at the Nigerian project and taking every step to transform it for good. The Nigerian people are enjoined to stand on the side of truth and to reject the mischief of all hunters of fortune whose interest is their own ambitions, for in this Ribadu Committee Report matter, personal ambitions are beginning to becloud the facts. President Jonathan will continue to provide leadership. Nobody should drag him into the cheap arena of opportunistic demagoguery.

    •Dr. Abati is Special Adviser to President Jonathan on Media and Publicity

  • Govt studying report, says Minister

    Govt studying report, says Minister

    Minister of Petroleum Resources Mrs. Diezani Alison-Madueke yesterday said the government was studying the report of committees investigating certain areas of the oil and gas sector, including the 21-member Petroleum Revenue Special Task Force headed by Mallam Nuhu Ribadu.

    According to a statement last night by the Group General Manager, Group Public Affairs Division, Fidel I. Pepple, the Minister said such reports are not normally put in public domain until the government has made its input.

    But there are fears that the Ministry of Petroleum Resources is uncomfortable with the findings and recommendations of Ribadu’s panel.

    The statement said: “The Minister of Petroleum Resources, Mrs. Diezani Alison-Madueke has provided some clarifications on the report of the committees set up earlier in the year to investigate certain areas of the oil and gas sector.

    “Speaking in an interview with Reuters recently, she stated that the report was in its final stages and will be presented to the President soon.

    “The following are excerpts of the interview: The report is not normally put in the public domain until the government’s complete report is finalized. What normally happens when you set up a committee is that when the committee hands in its report, a team is put together by the arm of government or agency that set up the committee in the first place. That has already happened. That team consists of people with relevant experience in the area.

    “So, it is not just about the Revenue Task Force. The Revenue Task Force handed in its report sometime in September. But there were also the Governance and Control and the Refineries Task Forces which have all sent in their draft reports. We have set up a team that is looking at them across the board to see if there is a difference in opinion or a difference in perspective.

    “This team will complete its work and submit a comprehensive report in the next 10 days. It is only after then that government will talk about implementation and the issues that you mentioned will be addressed. Government will decide on where to draw the line on any issue that is not in conformity with its policies. And some of the points you have raised are, in fact, not as they have been presented. I am very careful not to comment on the report until it has been finalized. There are areas that have already been handled by these committees because they are not the way they were presented. That is why I’m very careful not to comment before we finalize. “There are some areas that I thought should be addressed because they come up very often in the media, such as the issue of discretionary awards. I have not given any discretionary award since the inception of this administration. What normally happens with discretionary awards is that they are part of marginal or major bid rounds.

    “It is in the President’s power by law to grant discretionary awards or to go with competitive bidding or to go with a mixed bag when you have a bid round, and it is entirely up to him to decide which way to go. When the next marginal or major bid rounds will be done, they will be publicly announced. “We do expect that within the next couple of months, the marginal bid rounds will be announced. We hope that the major bid round will follow before the end of the year.”

    But there are fears that the Ministry of Petroleum Resources is uncomfortable with the findings and recommendations of Ribadu’s panel.

    A highly-placed source said: “The Petroleum Revenue Task Force actually submitted its report to the Minister late August and members of the panel have been awaiting invitation from the Minister for a formal presentation of the document.

    The committee would have used the presentation of the report to draw the attention of Nigerians to some highlights in the report.

    “The question Nigerians should ask is: Why can’t the Minister allow the committee to formally submit its report before studying it? They are trying to put the cart before the horse. There are speculations about the likelihood of tampering with the report under the guise of analyzing it.

    “Up till now, the team has not got any words from the Minister. Members of the Ribadu panel want more transparency in line with the assurance they had given to the international community, especially the IOCs.”

  • Report exposes corruption in Nigeria’s oil industry

    Report exposes corruption in Nigeria’s oil industry

    … Says ‘country loses billions in cut price deals’

    Nigeria lost out on tens of billions of dollars in oil and gas revenues over the last decade from cut price deals struck between multinational oil companies and government officials, a confidential report seen by Reuters says.

    A team headed by the former Chairman of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, Nuhu Ribadu produced the 146-page study on an oil ministry request.

    It covers the year 2002 to the present.

    Nigeria is Africa’s largest crude oil exporter, shipping more than two million barrels per day (bpd), and is also home to the world’s ninth biggest gas reserves and one of its largest Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) export terminals.

    The report provides new details on Nigeria’s long history of corruption in the oil sector, which has enriched its elite and provided the oil majors with hefty profits while two thirds of people live in poverty.

    The Minister of Petroleum Resources, Diezani Alison-Madueke told Reuters on Tuesday she had received the report last month but that it was a draft and the government was still supposed to give input.

    The one seen by Reuters was labelled “Final Report.”

    The report concluded that oil majors Shell, Total and Eni made bumper profits from cut-price gas, while Nigerian oil ministers handed out licences at their own discretion.

    This, while not illegal, did not follow best practice of using open bids. Hundreds of millions of dollars in signature bonuses on those deals were also missing, it said.

    “We have not seen this report and are, therefore, unable to comment on the content, but we will study it if and when it is published,” a Shell spokesman said.

    The report alleges international oil traders sometimes buy crude without any formal contracts, and the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation had short-changed the country’s treasury billions over the last 10 years by selling crude oil and gas to itself below market rates.

    There was no suggestion that the oil majors or traders had done anything illegal, but the report highlighted a lack of transparency in their dealings in a nation rife with graft.

    “It is a draft,” Alison-Madueke said. “There will be some areas where the government … may have a slightly different opinion … (and) will put its point of view to the committee.”

    The minister said she expects the final report to be with President Goodluck Jonathan within two weeks.

     

  • House report asks govt to contest Bakassi judgment

    House report asks govt to contest Bakassi judgment

    The House of Representatives report has said Nigeria must contest the ruling of the International Court of Justice October 10, 2002 which led to the ceding of Bakassi and the commencement of the delineation of the boundaries between Nigeria and Cameroun from Lake Chad to the Seas.

    The report of the Joint Committee on Foreign Affairs, Justice and Special Duties interactive meeting with experts on the maritime boundaries of Nigeria and the future of Bakassi, was laid before the House yesterday.

    The 10-page report, which has 10 findings and four recommendations said Cameroon obtained the judgment fraudulently.

    The report in its findings, states: “The foundation on which the International Court of Justice ruling was predicated was “ab initio” faulty and that the Bakassi Pennisula on the basis of indigenous ownership, historical consolidation and effective occupation had always belonged to Nigeria.

    “There is no concrete evidence of ratifications of the 1913 agreement on which the International Court of Justice ruling was predicated. The 1913 Anglo-German treaty which Cameroon rested its claim was not signed by both countries before the outbreak of the First World War in 1914.

    “The memoirs of Prince Karl Max Lichnowsky, a former German Ambassador and a Principal negotiator of the 1913 proposed agreement was found. He was quoted to have regretted the non-entry into force of the Agreement. He said ‘The Treaty which offered us Extraordinary Advantages, a result of more than one year’s work was thus dropped. It would have been a public success for me.’

    All the subsequent agreements made between Britain and Germany, as well as France explicitly recognised that the Bakassi Pennisula had been effectively occupied by the Efik ethnic group of Nigeria.

    “After the World War I, Germany renounced all it’s territorial claims in 1919 and all the former territories controlled by Germany came under the mandate of the League of Nations.

    “A plebiscite was conducted on March 18, 1961, in Southern Cameroon to determine communities that either wanted to stay in Cameroun or join Nigeria. Communities such as Manfe, Bamenda, Kumba, and Victoria participated. Bakassi never participated in the exercise because it was never in contention that Bakassi was Nigerian. (see appendix 1 Southern Cameroun Gazette published by EUEA Authority 18th March 1961, Vol.7,no.14 showing the result of voting by plebiscite districts of the whole Southern Cameroun. “it is worthy of note that the people of Bakassi had always participated in Nigerian elections.”

    The committee said it “noted that the people of Bakassi have asserted unequivocally their unwillingness to and/or live under Cameroonian authority.”

    The report’s recommendations read: “The committee hereby recommends that the Nigerian Government should as a matter of urgency and necessity approach the International Court of Justice for a review of the 2002 judgment on the basis of the following assertions.

    (1) Article 61 of the International Court of Justice ICJ’s statute clearly defines the procedure to seek for review of its judgment. (see Appendix2.)

    Based on the fresh evidence that was not known to the ICJ and more importantly the 10year timeframe stipulated by this statute, the Nigerian Government should proceed immediately to file for a review. (October 10-2012 is the deadline)

    (2) The Green-Tree-Agreement entered into by the government of Nigeria and Cameroun as a result of the ICJ judgment which eventually led to the Nigerian government ceding Bakassi to Cameroun is a clear violation of Section 12(1) of the 199 constitution which states that “No Treaty between the federation and any other country shall have the force of law to the extent to which any such Treaty have been enacted into law by the National Assembly”. The implication is that the Gren-Tree-Agreement does not have the force of law.

    (3) Increasing security challenges and the threat to our territorial integrity was put on full glare as it was noted that there is decreased piracy activity in the Somalia-Eritrea region due to heavy UN presence on those waters and a transfer of the nefarious activities to the waters surrounding Nigeria as a result of skeletal (if any) presence of the Nigerian Navy on the waters of Bakassi owing to constant conflict between the Nigerian Navy and the Cameroonian Navy as to who owns the waters. Vulnerability of the Bakassi water ways poses a huge security risk as we battle insecurity on land and we are faced with insecurity on water.

    (4) The Nigerian government must realize that SELF DETERMINATION is a fundamental right to which Bakassi people can avail themselves of especially where a sovereign state abdicates her responsibility towards a constituent part of her territory. We must therefore do everything within our power to ensure that the people of Bakassi continue to feel,that they are part and parcel of their homeland.

    Given the short window period on the issue, the report which was jointly signed by the Chairman of the House Committee on Foreign Affairs, Nnena Elendu-Ukeje, Chairman House Committtee on Justice, Ali Ahmad and Chairman of the House Committee on Special Duties, Bello Kaoje, is mostly likely to be given accelerated consideration and its recommendation adopted this week.